Connect with us

All about Cannabis

How Pierre Poilievre Will Ban Cannabis – Weed | Cannabis | Marijuana



Could future Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Poilievre ban cannabis without any parliamentary debate?

When governments worldwide overreacted to the coronavirus, Canadians smoked record amounts of weed. It’s only natural that when placed under house arrest and fed propaganda about the end of the world, people felt the need to smoke away the stress.

But so what? Cannabis is a harmless plant. It is non-lethal and non-toxic. It will not poison you or leave you “addicted.”

Yet, public health busybodies don’t believe this.

These are the same fascists that called (or continue to call) for lockdowns and vaccine mandates. These people believe their “expert opinion” overrides our legal system and the rule of law.

They think “cannabis use disorder” inflicts people like a disease. That its medical value is overstated and its harms are underappreciated.

So all Poilievre has to do is say he’s “listening to the experts,” and voilà!

Prohibited cannabis and without parliamentary debate. That is how Pierre Poilievre will ban cannabis.

Will Pierre Poilievre Ban Cannabis? 

How Pierre Poilievre Will Ban Cannabis

When British Columbia decriminalized opioids, cocaine, methamphetamine, and MDMA this past June, Pierre Poilievre tweeted negatively.

“Decriminalizing deadly drug use is the opposite of compassionate. Those struggling with addiction need treatment & recovery. Drug dealers need strong policing & tough sentences.”

Of course, Poilievre is right for all the wrong reasons.

If we accept the decrees of public health when there’s a flu pandemic, why not trust their expertise with drug use?

Instead of decriminalizing drugs, B.C. police could arrest users and throw them into psychiatric wards against their will. Take their phones and cut them off from the outside world. That’s what addiction treatment and recovery are all about, after all.

And then, I think we can all agree that your local fentanyl dealer deserves the death penalty.

As for cannabis? It’s unlikely the Conservatives will repeal the Cannabis Act any more than they repealed same-sex marriage laws.

But, as I said, Poilievre doesn’t need parliamentary approval. 

Power is getting concentrated in the hands of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO). And at the expense of the House of Commons and the Cabinet.

This trend didn’t begin under Justin Trudeau. Still, he certainly accelerated it just as Stephen Harper accelerated the trend from the Liberal government before him.

There’s no reason to think Poilievre would give up this kind of power.

Seriously, Will Pierre Poilievre Ban Cannabis? 

How Pierre Poilievre Will Ban Cannabis

No, probably not. 

But what if Poilievre wants to remove cannabis from Canada like Justin Trudeau is disarming the public? 

In that case, Poilievre doesn’t need anyone’s approval except his own. Trudeau is making firearms illegal through an Order-in-Council

In theory, the entire Cabinet drafts an Order-in-Council. The governor-general then approves it. In most cases, orders-in-council are notices of federal appointments or regulations. 

They are not meant to replace the legislative process. But that is what Justin Trudeau is doing. He is using an order-in-council the way U.S. Presidents use an Executive Order.

Even if you support Justin’s strict, state-enforced gun control, you should disagree with how he’s doing it. 

For if he can introduce new sweeping laws through an order-in-council, there’s nothing to stop a Conservative government from using the same process to re-prohibit cannabis. 

Pierre Poilievre Ban Cannabis? Here’s What He’ll Do Instead


Canada’s legalization review is long overdue. I don’t expect a Poilievre government to push for reform unless it turns out legalization is costing taxpayers billions more in regulatory oversight than alcohol or tobacco.

In that case, Poilievre may want to seek Ontario Conservative Premier Doug Ford’s advice. When once asked about the proliferation of cannabis shops, he said, “It doesn’t matter if it’s cannabis or another type of the store, the market will take care of it.”

That is the correct answer.

What Poilievre Should Be Doing

How Pierre Poilievre Will Ban Cannabis

Poilievre is talking about removing gatekeepers so Canadians can build more homes and live in them. 

Instead of a hypothetical where Pierre Poilievre bans cannabis, what about one where he improves the industry by gutting taxes and regulations? 

Cannabis biomass is the responsibility of Ottawa. Poilievre can repeal the Cannabis Act and replace it with legislation that treats cannabis as the agricultural commodity that it is.

Using hemp in construction is not a fringe idea. While it has drawbacks (like not being suitable as a load-bearing material), hemp is an excellent insulator and absorbs carbon. Hempcrete handles moisture well, reduces the possibility of mould and promotes good indoor air quality.

Cannabis can also make bioethanol, a petrol substitute from fermented stalks. Hemp biodiesel, which works for diesel engines, is produced using the plant’s oil. Less toxic than table salt, hemp can run on an unmodified diesel engine and burns clean enough to pass federal regulations.

Will Poilievre do these things? Unlikely, but considering he’s already considered a fringe radical by the corporate press, what does he have to lose? 

Poilievre says Wilfred Laurier is one of his favourite prime ministers. Laurier once said, “Canada is free, and freedom is its nationality.”

Suppose Poilievre wants a spot in history books next to Laurier. In that case, he can transform the Canadian economy from petroleum-based to cannabis-based. 

He’d go down as a pioneer—a founding father of the new green economy. And not the fake-green propaganda we hear from the World Economic Forum and other globalist organizations.

I mean, real, natural environmental conservation. 

Policies that don’t sacrifice our liberty or standard of living. Policies that recognize pollution for what it is: private property violations. 

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

All about Cannabis

Cannabis genetics that express humulene




Terpene profiles will soon be commonplace among cannabis consumers. Rare profiles with a variety of terpenes comprise exotic cannabis chemovars — also known as strains. Albeit less common, some exotic cannabis genetics and at least one traditional cultivar can produce humulene.

Humulene is closely related to the more common terpene, b-caryophyllene. Due to a different double bond in their chemical structure, the two related molecules present vastly different effects. Unlike caryophyllene, though, humulene does not bind to cannabinoid receptors.

Cannabis cultivars with humulene

Afghan Kush

Potent strains derive from the Afghanistan/Pakistan border near the Hindu Kush mountains. Cannabis’s history in the region stretches back centuries, with landrace genetics still found in parts of Afghanistan. And the Hindu Kush mountain system is the birthplace of the strongest cannabis varieties.

Cultivars from Afghanistan were available in America as early as the 1960s. But the genetic stunk like dead skunk, slowing the strain’s spread in the West.

Thiols and myrcene produce the Indica’s pungent and sweet profile. But some Afghanistan cultivars — even crossed with a BC OG Kush — are more spicy and earthy with their b-caryophyllene and humulene backgrounds.

Death Bubba

Death Bubba crosses Bubba Kush with the Skunk derivative, Deathstar. Bubba Kush derives from a cut of Northern Lights and OG Kush back in 1996, according to legend. 

Death Bubba is, therefore, dominant in Hindu and OG-based genetics, with a slight backdrop of Mexican and Columbian. And mild sedation following a pungent aroma and taste agrees with the cultivar’s heritage.

Death Bubba genetics can produce cannabis dominant in myrcene, limonene, and caryophyllene or humulene with undertones of bisabolol or camphene.

Death Bubba


Bred by In House Genetics, Slurricane propagates from Purple Punch crossed with a Do-si-Dos. Grapes and acrid stone fruits best describe Slurricane’s flavour and aroma. And while the strain’s genetics are diverse, its name comes from a hurricane-like effect.

Breeders began propagating prime cultivars and keeping their parent’s ID a secret by the 1980s. Strains today, therefore, contain many mysterious landrace ancestors as a result of proprietary cultivations.

A Phylos Biosciences genetic report, however, puts Gold Columbian as one of the most genetically distant cultivars from a Slurricane cut. Throughout the family tree, Hindu, Skunk, and OG genetics likely dominate this complex cultivar. Although South Africa’s Durban genetics also tie into Slurricane.

Peanut Butter Mac

Cuts of PB MAC can express a unique secondary profile featuring humulene. Peanut Butter Breath by ThugPug Genetics crosses with Miracle Alien Cookies (MAC) by Capulator to create Peanut Butter MAC.

Their lineages greatly vary, yet Slurricane shares multiple family members with Peanut Butter strains. Do-si-dos and Mendo Purps are common ancestors, for example. And while various landraces mix into MAC. Capulator bred Miracle Alien Cookies using a cross of Columbian and the Hindu forward, Starfighter.

Peanut Butter MAC is suitable for anyone who enjoys a PB&J on a forested hike. Caryophyllene, humulene, and limonene are predominant throughout the experience. Humulene and farnesene are more common in hops than cannabis, yet both terpenes are present in some cuts of PB MAC.


Cannabis appears to produce humulene when Afghanistan genetics cross into various OG Kush cultivars. Of course, this review cannot dive into a specific strain’s complex genetic realm.

Let us know in the comments what you think of the terpene, humulene. Do you have any high-humulene strain suggestions?


Source link

Continue Reading

All about Cannabis

Reviewing the Cannabis Act – Cannabis | Weed | Marijuana




Justin Trudeau’s hashtag government is finally reviewing the Cannabis Act – a year late.

They want to know: has cannabis legalization been successful?

Not in the sense of whether it’s been working for those who buy, sell, and consume cannabis. No, according to the Liberal’s Cannabis Act, the review must focus on Indigenous people, home growing, and whether legalization has helped the children.

After all, it was never about your right to your body. Post-COVID, it’s clear that freedom doesn’t exist. It’s a privilege handed out whenever the corporate state sees fit.

According to Justin’s Health Minister, this review will be “inclusive” and “evidence-driven.” And the result will “strengthen the act so that it meets the needs of all Canadians while continuing to displace the illicit market.” 

You can see the problem here.

Reviewing the Cannabis Act – a year late.

Reviewing the Cannabis Act

Reviewing the Cannabis Act is a year late. The Liberals said they’d do it three years after legalization. Nevertheless, it’s here. 

A couple of federal ministers announced how the Liberals would be reviewing the Cannabis Act. Like the Legalization Task Farce, there will be an “expert panel” led by retired career bureaucrat Morris Rosenberg.

Rosenberg is well-liked across the board. Everyone expects him to do a competent job.

And he might. But any recommendations can be ignored by Justin Trudeau’s hashtag government. Reviewing the Cannabis Act may not yield any positive results for anyone.

The government hasn’t named the other members of the “expert panel.”

Confines of the Review 

Reviewing the Cannabis Act

The issue with reviewing the Cannabis Act is that the Act itself demands “dual objectives of protecting public health and maintaining public safety.”

“Public health” means more of the same political spin about cannabis’ alleged harms and impact on children and indigenous people. Interesting that the federal government needs to hold the hand of these two identity groups.

I thought children had parents and mentors who looked after them. And aren’t indigenous people free, adult human beings?

This is why Justin Trudeau’s government is a hashtag government. They care more for optics and sound bytes than substance—they fake sincerity.

And this causes real-world destruction.

Look at the amount of plastic waste the Cannabis Act has created. Combined with face masks showing up in the ocean, fertilizer mandates, and not building pipelines, Justin Trudeau’s hashtag government has been a net negative for the environment.

Justin, his cronies and supporters don’t understand that fossil fuels are necessary to transition off fossil fuels. You can’t dictate consumer demand and expect the market to follow.

This hubris is why the illegal cannabis market still exists.

The “public health” approach to cannabis prevents BC Bud from operating aboveboard.

Cutting bureaucratic red tape and refocusing legalization away from “public health” and toward a viable commercial industry needs to be done.

What Canadians choose to do with their bodies is of no concern to the federal government.

Reviewing the Cannabis Act: 18 Months Later

Reviewing the Cannabis Act is not only a year late, but they expect the “expert panel” to take 18 months to conclude.

The problem is, with the current excise tax regime, many smaller producers won’t last. 

The government hasn’t rewarded those who have tried to play by the rules.

And that’s the problem in a nutshell. If you want to displace the “black market,” you must make it worthwhile for those individuals to get licences.

But when even the large licensed producers complain about an overtly restricted regime, what incentive does BC Bud have?

Reviewing the Cannabis Act means an “expert” panel will spend 18 months and hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars focusing in the wrong direction.

Fortunately, alongside public health busybodies, the panel will also hear from the cannabis industry and the general public.

So there’s an opportunity to turn the tide. Direct the narrative away from concern about children, edibles, and home-growing to excise taxes and a bloated bureaucracy.

Ottawa doesn’t license craft brewers in British Columbia. It has no business doing the same for cannabis.


Source link

Continue Reading

All about Cannabis

Making Sense of the COVID Cannabis Surge  – Cannabis | Weed | Marijuana




How can we make sense of the COVID Cannabis surge? As reported previously, a pandemic-induced cannabis bubble has now burst. Total market cannabis sales are now in decline but what’s happened is a return to pre-pandemic market conditions.

We can answer some pressing questions using real-time sales reporting from Headset Insight. Namely, did we see a more significant decline in transaction volume or transaction size?

Which products fared best and worst during the last couple of years? And which customers are now buying less cannabis than they were in 2020 and 2021.

Digging into these underlying issues reveals patterns we can discern from the data. We know the COVID cannabis surge was real, so let’s discuss the details.

Decreases in Cannabis Transactions 

COVID Cannabis Surge

This graph shows the monthly transaction volume of the median store in four markets (California, Colorado, Oregon and Washington). Previously, Headset marked mid-summer as the turning point for when sales begin to stagnate and decline.

You can see that point marked by a grey dotted line.

Transaction volumes have been steadily declining. For example, the California median store transaction volume dropped from 7,309 transactions in July 2021 to 6,106 transactions in July 2022.

COVID Cannabis Surge – Shrinking Baskets

COVID Cannabis Surge

Again we look at the median store in each of these US cannabis markets. This time we’re looking at the average transaction or basket size trend. (Basket size is a measurement describing how many items a consumer purchases in a single transaction).

Similar to the previous graph, there is a steady decline across all markets. Consumers are spending less overall on each trip to the cannabis store.

The average basket size at a median Colorado store in July 2021 was $59.73.

In July 2022, it was $55.21.

This means that the COVID cannabis surge was indeed a pandemic-related consumer response.

Transaction volume vs. Transaction size 

COVID Cannabis Surge

Decreasing transaction volume and shrinking baskets have both contributed to overall sales declines. But which one is causing the most impact?

The chart above compares relative declines in median store transaction volume and average basket size by state from July 2021 to July 2022.

In every market, the relative decrease in transaction volume is more significant than the relative decrease in basket size.

This decrease implies that the reduced number of transactions has had a more significant effect on sales than shrinking baskets.

Of course, this depends on the market. In Colorado, for example, the retraction in overall transaction volume is nearly double the decline in basket size. Whereas, in Washington, these two data points are almost identical.

Category performance in California 

It can be tricky discovering sales trends among the different product categories. Diving into the data, we can see what’s contributed to recent downturns in top-line sales.

The chart above shows the year-over-year sales growth of different products in California. It then compares it to total market growth over the same period.

Flower, of course, performed well. From July 2019 to July 2020, flower sales growth rates were nearly double of the overall California market. This is the COVID cannabis surge in action.

Drinks and vape pens have maintained positive growth while topical and tinctures sales are decreasing.

Category Performance in Washington 

Washington’s cannabis market performed similarly to California’s. Flower saw a massive increase in early 2020, a poster child for the COVID cannabis surge.

Flower is now correcting while drinks and vapes remain consistent. Like California, tinctures are on the decline. But, unlike California, the topical category saw positive growth. 

Trends among top cannabis spenders before and after the COVID Cannabis surge

Who helped create the COVID cannabis surge? Top cannabis consumers spend more than average and contribute a disproportionate percentage of revenue to the cannabis industry.

This graph shows the median total spending of the top 10% of cannabis consumers over three months (May to July) over the past four years.

These customers have the greatest (relative) influence on top-line sales. For example, the top 10% in California have accounted for 30% of all cannabis sales this year.

On average, the top 10% also spent $100 more during the COVID cannabis surge than in 2019.

This trend shows that the top-tier cannabis buyers were influencing the COVID cannabis surge by purchasing more cannabis than average. This trend now appears to be in decline.

Cannabis customers compared 

The graph above compares the top 10% with the rest of the group. Here, we can reach the 10% with the bottom 90% and how it relates to the COVID cannabis surge.

In 2020, all cannabis consumers increased their spending. This is what we mean by the COVID cannabis surge. 90% of customers in California increased their spending just as much as the top 10% did.

In 2021, all groups had flat year-over-year growth in spending.

As the COVID cannabis surge officially ended by 2022, the differences between these two customer types are apparent.

In both Washington and California, the summer spending of the median customer in the top 10% decreased significantly more than that of the median customer in the bottom 90%.

Cannabis’ biggest spenders are tightening their belts. This is causing top-line market retractions.

COVID Cannabis surge broken down by age

All age groups follow a similar pattern. Generation X had the highest spending levels, while Millennials still contributed the most considerable total revenue.

Year over year growth in median customer spending during the May-June period is graphed above. During the 2020 COVID cannabis surge, younger customers spent more. This may be because older generations were less willing to venture outside the house and visit a retail shop.

Median customer spending held flat in 2021 across all age groups.

So far in 2022, most age groups have averaged similar decreases in spending. One exception is Generation Z which has the most significant reduction in total spending at -11%.

This data suggests that the youngest customers were also fuelling the COVID cannabis surge in early 2020.

In Summary

The COVID Cannabis surge is over. We see this with decreases in both transaction volume and basket size. However, reductions in transaction volume have a greater influence.

Flower remains the most volatile, with massive surges early in the pandemic with significant corrections in 2022.

Beverages and vape products have remained the most consistent during the rise and fall of the COVID cannabis surge.

The top 10% of cannabis consumers increased their spending in 2022 but decreased their spending in 2022 more than the bottom 90% of customers.

Younger customers were also responsible for the COVID cannabis surge. But customers across all age groups are now reducing their spending at more or less equal rates.


Source link

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media