Connect with us

All about Cannabis

If Cannabis is Legal, Why the Police Raids? – Cannabis | Weed | Marijuana



If cannabis in Canada is legal, why are there still police raids?

Suppose, for instance, you travel back to the 1990s, and you say in the future, cannabis is legal, but police still get funding and make raids on “illegal grow-ops,” you might scratch your head.

If cannabis is legal, how are there still police raids? How are people still growing illegally?

How can the Ontario police make an $8.5 million discovery of 10,000 plants and 113 kilograms of dried flower? Why wasn’t this massive enterprise legal?

A Brief History of Cannabis in Canada

If Cannabis is Legal, Why the Police Raids?

If cannabis in Canada is legal, why are there still police raids? The answer is that not all cannabis is legal. As I correctly predicted, Justin Trudeau never intended to legalize cannabis.

Justin is a shill. A wokester who deserves prison. His plan was to corporatize it.

In late 2012, the former Harper government announced an overhaul of the medical system. Patients wouldn’t be able to grow for themselves anymore. They were going to have to go through a corporate LP system.

Patients sued, won, and now even recreational consumers can grow (unless you’re in Quebec).

All Justin Trudeau did was change the laws so these large-scale medical cannabis producers could sell to the general public. Although not directly. First, they must go through an inefficient and ineffective government wholesale distribution centre.

The only way to grow and sell cannabis or industrial hemp is by receiving approval from Health Canada.

You can imagine the situation if the nation produced food like this. Ontario police raiding local farmers’ markets’ over “illicit” tomatoes.

If Cannabis is Legal, Why the Police Raids?

Recently, the Durhan Regional Police Service’s Drug Enforcement Unit found a massive “grow-op” out on highway 7. As mentioned, an estimated $8.5 million worth of goods and capital were present.

Earlier this month, police charged two senior citizens in Caledon for operating an “illicit” cannabis farm and making concentrates. With over 16.5 kilograms of cannabis oil and 500 plants, police estimated the street value was shy of $5 million.

This past summer, Ontario police raided two greenhouse sites and discovered 45,000 plants, estimated at $61 million.

Ontario police charged three people in May after raiding a farm near Renfrew and finding 7,600 cannabis plants.

In March, another 7,600 plants were seized by the police out in Essex County, near Leamington, Ontario.

And that’s just this year. In one province. And that’s not even all of them, just the large ones.

What’s going on here? If cannabis is legal, why aren’t these people getting proper licences?

The Problem with Cannabis in Canada

Canada excessively regulates its cannabis industry.

From Health Canada’s onerous regulations, asinine licensing processes, federal excise taxes, and provincial wholesalers to the general incompetence of every level of government.

If you want your country or state to legalize cannabis, look to more liberal regimes like Colorado. Canada is not an example for the world to follow.

As part of Justin Trudeau’s pledge for legal cannabis, there was the caveat that he’d make it harder for organized crime to operate.

Now, the people involved in Ontario‘s recent cannabis raids may be pieces of trash. They could have been cutting corners, spraying plants with pesticides, and making solvents unsafely.

But it’s also possible their only crime is producing a plant that government excessively regulates.

Ontario doesn’t have a problem with alcohol bootleggers. There is no black market in craft beer. That’s because the regulations allow anyone to enter the business.

With some start-up capital and ambition, you can make it as a craft brewer in Ontario.

You can’t say the same for craft cannabis.

If Cannabis is Legal, Why the Police Raids?

Cannabis is not legal. It’s been corporatized. Health Canada wouldn’t be the gatekeeper for production licensing if it were legal. Police wouldn’t be raiding peaceful farmers.

In a genuine free market, we wouldn’t even need licensing. Insomuch that accreditation is important, consumers will pay the premiums if that’s something they value.

In the meantime, Justin Trudeau has fulfilled his promise to “legalize, restrict, and regulate” cannabis.

For someone who admires China’s “basic dictatorship,” it’s clear cannabis legalization was going to mean all within the state, nothing outside the state, and nothing against the state.

Justin’s Liberals were clear from the beginning. Police were going to get more funding and powers to fight “the black market.”

Cannabis is legal in Canada, so why the police raids? Because cannabis is not legal. It’s stamped with a barcode and sits under fluorescent lighting, hiding behind opaque child-resistant plastic containers.

Cannabis prohibition is still alive and well in Canada.

Source link

All about Cannabis

George Smitherman on Cannabis in Canada – Cannabis | Weed | Marijuana




If you believe Justin Trudeau sold cannabis in Canada out to a Laurentian Elite, then George Smitherman is your boogeyman.

A former politician and now licensed producer, he’s also President and CEO Cannabis Council of Canada (C3). 

When the Trudeau government announced a review of the Cannabis Act, C3 released “Five Big Asks.”

They are:

  1. Address the financial viability of Licence holders by fixing the excise tax, provincial distributor mark-ups and fees.
  2. Level the playing field with the illicit market.
  3. Allow Licence holders to communicate with consumers, including about the effects of cannabis.
  4. Eliminate costly “red tape” and unnecessary “Nanny State” regulations.
  5. Strengthen patient access to medical cannabis.

Except for #2, these are all reasonable asks.

But what about #2? 

What does “level the playing field” mean? I asked George Smitherman this, and here’s what he said.

George Smitherman on “Levelling the Playing Field” with Illicit Cannabis 

George Smitherman on Cannabis in Canada

Just when you think Justin’s Liberals couldn’t be any more incompetent, you discover new depths. 

The C3 doesn’t like illegal cannabis stores in the GTA for obvious reasons. They’re also not big fans of illicit online sales and delivery. 

Their call for more enforcement is entirely logical from their viewpoint.

“I can’t use a website,” George tells me over the phone, “If I’m in the licensed industry, I can’t sell my weed for delivery across the country via website.”

Why aren’t the police doing something? They are, as you can tell from the headlines. Police tend to go after the source, not the retailer.

But George’s problem is that he’s got bureaucrats breathing down his neck (although he didn’t use such blunt language).

“We’re playing by the rules,” George Smitherman says. “We’re paying all the fees. And it’s expensive, it’s not cheap.”

The problem is the Cannabis Act isn’t worth the trouble. Get licensed, and you’re regulated to death by public health busybodies. “The regulators and the lawmakers have nothing but attention for you,” says George. 

Or don’t get licensed and risk fines and imprisonment. And since the legacy cannabis market has an extensive history with the latter option…

George on BC Bud 

George Smitherman on Cannabis in Canada

George Smitherman agreed that the federal government could displace the cannabis black market. If they addressed #1 and #3 of the “Big Five Asks” (dialing down the taxes and regulations).

Our disagreement was on what that would entail.

I am undoubtedly part of the “regulatory liberationists,” who would like to see a commercial cannabis industry.

George Smitherman is “practical” and wants incremental steps to balance public health with a profitable cannabis sector.

Nevertheless, Health Canada has made it clear it thinks its micro-licensing scheme is the proper path forward for BC Bud.

C3 agrees, “We believe that the amount of growing space for micros needs to be increased,” says George.

And while he does try to be mindful of the different cannabis cultures, especially on the West Coast, George ultimately says he doesn’t think the grey market exists.

“I think that’s just fuzzy branding,” he says.

It’s one thing to be a small mom-and-pop farm, but not going through the legal means becomes a problem at some point.

Ultimately, it’s a disagreement over testing and safety. As evidenced by some impure cannabis from illicit markets, it seems restrictive regulations are better than no regulations.

And not doubt a lot of Ontario‘s black market weed sucks.

But in British Columbia? Especially in the smaller connoisseur market? The lack of regulations has created a culture of customary rules. And this cannabis tests just fine with or without Ottawa’s bureaucracy.

George on the “Nanny State” Cannabis Regulations 

George Smitherman on Cannabis in Canada

What does that mean when George Smitherman and the C3 ask the government to eliminate costly red tape and unnecessary Nanny State cannabis regulations?

George Smitherman is admittedly “motivated” by the public health goals of the Cannabis Act. Removing Nanny State regulations is about increasing the THC limits on edibles.

“It’s missing the mark for the regular consumer of cannabis edibles,” says George. If the government is serious about displacing the black market, “they need to raise the edible limit.”

But as for delegating production licenses to the provinces? George isn’t aware of any movement to make this happen. He is critical of the idea we need to start over again with less focus on public health.

“Obviously that’s not the approach of the Cannabis Act, but I definitely get where those arguments are coming from.”

George on the Cannabis Act Review

George Smitherman Cannabis

What does George Smitherman think of the Cannabis Act review? The same thing we’re all thinking: hurry up!

We agreed that small producers and manufacturers suffer under excise taxes and prohibitive regulations.

Won’t they be bankrupt by the time this cannabis review wraps up?

“Cynically, I might say, anything that starts late is in a bad spot,” he says. “If 18 months of a report results in that report being sent somewhere else for consideration, that’s not a formula for the timely response that the sector needs.”

We can agree on urgency. And both George and I are pleased to see the review board will at least listen to consumers and the industry rather than narrowly define the scope of its mandate.

In Summary

Justin Trudeau promised to license, restrict, and regulate cannabis. His government managed to license it. They certainly regulate it to death. 

But restrict? That was always an impossible feat. You can’t dictate consumer demand.

This Liberal government isn’t likely to remove cannabis regulatory gatekeepers. Therefore, the illicit market will likely have no incentive to join the legal regime.

And so guys like George Smitherman and the C3 will continue to call for greater cannabis enforcement. 

In the words of Ringo Starr, “Everything government touches turns to crap.”


Source link

Continue Reading

All about Cannabis

Cannabis Industry vs ESG “Woke” Cartel  – Cannabis | Weed | Marijuana




What role does the ESG “woke” cartel play in the cannabis industry?

Despite legalization efforts across western nations, cannabis still gets a bad rap. Authorities call it addictive and claim it causes psychosis and poor mental health.

They’ll say that the cannabis industry uses too much water, causes too much pollution, and point to other dismal environmental practices that developed during prohibition.

Therefore, the Environmental Social Governance (ESG) woke cartel has come to save the day. People like growing and consuming cannabis. We can’t have that!

Instead of measuring success based on happy customers and growing profit margins, proponents of ESG say business owners must weigh the cannabis industry’s success against environmental, social, and governing aspects.

But, as Elon Musk correctly tweeted, “ESG is a scam.”

ESG Investing vs. Common Sense 

Cannabis Industry vs ESG "Woke" Cartel 

Environmental, social governance (ESG) investing is a type of activist index fund the cannabis industry should avoid like the plague. 

Traditionally, you assess a company’s viability with balance sheets, cash-flow statements, income statements, shareholders’ equity statements, etc.

Typically you calculate ratios to give you a glimpse of the business’s financial health.

A debt-to-equity ratio indicates the proportion of equity and debt used to finance the company’s assets.

A cash asset ratio that compares current assets with liabilities. A return on equity is the net income return as a percentage of shareholder equity.

Or net profit margin. This one indicates the business’s efficiency in controlling costs. A higher net profit margin shows more efficiency in converting revenue into actual profit.

A lot of people struggle with these concepts. Or they remain entirely ignorant of them. And not just your average joe.

Consider political leaders who have been blaming inflation on “corporate greed.” Major grocery store chains are reporting record profits. This has left-leaning demagogues calling for a wealth tax.

But if you look beyond the headlines, you’ll see that net profit margins are either the same or, in some cases, less. 

Or, take Canada’s licensed producers of cannabis. How many are cash-flow positive? 

There’s more to the complex capitalist economy than just “profit and loss.” Yet critics of capitalism don’t usually think through the problem this far.

This leads us to environmental, social governance investing, or ESG. 

What is the ESG Investing?

Cannabis Industry vs ESG "Woke" Cartel 

The cannabis industry would be wise to avoid ESG-centric investing if it can.

Like labour unions reducing productivity in pursuit of political goals, a situation where ESG investing becomes mandatory is problematic.

Suddenly, the financial health of a business isn’t dependent on whether they serve consumers effectively but rather on the standards set by politicians. 

The Environmental, Social, and Governance Index is a Chinese-style social credit score for corporations.

Many might cheer on that “we” are policing corporations. But this is a simplistic reading that doesn’t require anything beyond surface-level analysis.

ESG has one goal: to create a woke cartel. 

Like how governments divided citizens with domestic covid vaccine passports, ESG aims to split the cannabis industry into two.

There will be those who go along with the woke demands of ESG. And then, some will prefer to run their business based on their customers’ input.

Of course, just like how you couldn’t perform basic activities without a vax-pass, cannabis companies not complying with ESG will find investment dry up.

It’ll be harder to do business when you’re a “noncompliant.”

Proof ESG is a Scam 

Cannabis Industry vs ESG "Woke" Cartel 

Who is this ESG woke cartel? And why is it a scam for everyone, not just the cannabis industry? 

Take Elon Musk, for example. He pulled Tesla from the S&P 500’s ESG Index earlier this year. 

Tesla has produced more electrical vehicles people want to buy and drive than any other car manufacturer.

That should have ranked Tesla at #1 in the ESG index, right?

No, Exxon Mobil ranks higher than Tesla, as does JP Morgan, the world’s largest investor in oil producers.

Why did Tesla rank lower than literal greenhouse gas producers and investors?

Apparently, it had to do with Tesla’s carbon strategy and codes of conduct. Tesla didn’t have a “low carbon strategy.” Which is seemingly more important than actually producing lower tons of carbon.

As well, Tesla suffered from claims of racial discrimination and poor working conditions at its Fremont factory.

Now, no one is saying these aren’t issues that should or shouldn’t affect the bottom line. But who decides? The buying public? Or an ESG index run by corporations and global technocrats at the World Economic Forum? 

ESG is a political spectacle. It’s meant to separate the woke from the non-woke. And since calling out the covid lockdowns as the fascist policies they are, Elon Musk has been in the “non-woke” category.

BlackRock & Vanguard: Should the Cannabis Industry be Worried about ESG?

BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager, and Vanguard comes in second. Both are behind what they call “stakeholder capitalism,” a belief that companies should benefit “stakeholders,” instead of their shareholders.

In his “2021 Letter to CEOs,” BlackRock’s CEO, Larry Fink, declared that “climate risk is investment risk.” 

“The creation of sustainable index investments has enabled a massive acceleration of capital towards companies better prepared to address climate risk.

“And because this will have such a dramatic impact on how capital is allocated, every management team and board will need to consider how this will impact their company’s stock.” 

Or, as World Economic Forum founder and chairman Klaus Schwab put it: “Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a ‘Great Reset’ of capitalism.”

Or, to quote Fink, “It is not a social or ideological agenda. It is not ‘woke.’ It is capitalism.”

But this is very clearly corporatism, also known as economic fascism. A handful of large companies coordinate production and special interest groups dictate society’s norms. 

Corporate power combines with the power of the state to push for ideological agendas. In this case, they are dismantling small businesses and creating a social credit system.

The end result will be a further concentration of corporate power, fewer individual freedoms, and a lot more propaganda about how your suffering is good for the planet.

Yes, the cannabis industry should be worried about ESG. ESG isn’t some future hypothetical. It’s already here.

Cannabis Industry already infected by ESG

You don’t have to go far to find the cannabis industry already infected by ESG-centric ideas.

Canadian company HEXO has publicly stated they want to be carbon neutral. Same with edible maker Wyld, who wants to produce biodegradable packaging.

Now, this sounds fine. And in many cases, it is. Justin Trudeau’s legalization has created so much plastic waste. If someone gave his government an honest ESG score, it would have to be in the negatives.

But, of course, that’s not how ESG works.

Cannabis company Trulieve has a dedicated ESG report. They even have an ESG board committee and flaunt their “Diversity, Inclusion and Equity” commitments.

Cannabis companies are jumping into the ESG world without thoroughly understanding its meaning.

On one side, you’ll lose the autonomy of your business to unelected bureaucrats and corporate asset managers. 

On the other side, you’ll lose customers. “Get woke, go broke,” is a mantra repeatedly being proved true.

Cannabis consumers want quality cannabis. Only racists care about the skin colour or ethnicity of the grower or budtender.

ESG is an index to measure compliance with the world elite. 

And some take the propaganda at its word. That ESG is about climate change. That those who disagree with Schwab and the WEF are “far-right extremists.”

These people are in for a rude awakening.


Source link

Continue Reading

All about Cannabis

Cannabis genetics that express humulene




Terpene profiles will soon be commonplace among cannabis consumers. Rare profiles with a variety of terpenes comprise exotic cannabis chemovars — also known as strains. Albeit less common, some exotic cannabis genetics and at least one traditional cultivar can produce humulene.

Humulene is closely related to the more common terpene, b-caryophyllene. Due to a different double bond in their chemical structure, the two related molecules present vastly different effects. Unlike caryophyllene, though, humulene does not bind to cannabinoid receptors.

Cannabis cultivars with humulene

Afghan Kush

Potent strains derive from the Afghanistan/Pakistan border near the Hindu Kush mountains. Cannabis’s history in the region stretches back centuries, with landrace genetics still found in parts of Afghanistan. And the Hindu Kush mountain system is the birthplace of the strongest cannabis varieties.

Cultivars from Afghanistan were available in America as early as the 1960s. But the genetic stunk like dead skunk, slowing the strain’s spread in the West.

Thiols and myrcene produce the Indica’s pungent and sweet profile. But some Afghanistan cultivars — even crossed with a BC OG Kush — are more spicy and earthy with their b-caryophyllene and humulene backgrounds.

Death Bubba

Death Bubba crosses Bubba Kush with the Skunk derivative, Deathstar. Bubba Kush derives from a cut of Northern Lights and OG Kush back in 1996, according to legend. 

Death Bubba is, therefore, dominant in Hindu and OG-based genetics, with a slight backdrop of Mexican and Columbian. And mild sedation following a pungent aroma and taste agrees with the cultivar’s heritage.

Death Bubba genetics can produce cannabis dominant in myrcene, limonene, and caryophyllene or humulene with undertones of bisabolol or camphene.

Death Bubba


Bred by In House Genetics, Slurricane propagates from Purple Punch crossed with a Do-si-Dos. Grapes and acrid stone fruits best describe Slurricane’s flavour and aroma. And while the strain’s genetics are diverse, its name comes from a hurricane-like effect.

Breeders began propagating prime cultivars and keeping their parent’s ID a secret by the 1980s. Strains today, therefore, contain many mysterious landrace ancestors as a result of proprietary cultivations.

A Phylos Biosciences genetic report, however, puts Gold Columbian as one of the most genetically distant cultivars from a Slurricane cut. Throughout the family tree, Hindu, Skunk, and OG genetics likely dominate this complex cultivar. Although South Africa’s Durban genetics also tie into Slurricane.

Peanut Butter Mac

Cuts of PB MAC can express a unique secondary profile featuring humulene. Peanut Butter Breath by ThugPug Genetics crosses with Miracle Alien Cookies (MAC) by Capulator to create Peanut Butter MAC.

Their lineages greatly vary, yet Slurricane shares multiple family members with Peanut Butter strains. Do-si-dos and Mendo Purps are common ancestors, for example. And while various landraces mix into MAC. Capulator bred Miracle Alien Cookies using a cross of Columbian and the Hindu forward, Starfighter.

Peanut Butter MAC is suitable for anyone who enjoys a PB&J on a forested hike. Caryophyllene, humulene, and limonene are predominant throughout the experience. Humulene and farnesene are more common in hops than cannabis, yet both terpenes are present in some cuts of PB MAC.


Cannabis appears to produce humulene when Afghanistan genetics cross into various OG Kush cultivars. Of course, this review cannot dive into a specific strain’s complex genetic realm.

Let us know in the comments what you think of the terpene, humulene. Do you have any high-humulene strain suggestions?


Source link

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media