Cannabis News

Maternal Cannabis Use Does Not Lead to Higher Rates of ADHD or Behavior Disorders in Children Says New Massive Medical Study

Published

1 month ago

October 23, 2024

admin

pregnant and used marijuana

Let’s get one thing straight right off the bat: it’s generally best for expecting mothers to avoid consuming any substances during pregnancy. That’s just common sense. But as someone who’s watched his wife go through the miraculous and downright brutal process of pregnancy twice, I can tell you firsthand – growing a human ain’t no walk in the park.

Pregnancy is hardcore, period. You’re bloated, in pain, and your organs are literally rearranging themselves to make room for a tiny squatter. And don’t even get me started on morning sickness. For some women, it’s more like all-day, soul-crushing nausea that makes you wonder why our species hasn’t gone extinct yet.

It’s no wonder that for centuries, cannabis has been viewed as a natural remedy for these pregnancy woes. Our ancestors knew a thing or two about plant medicine, after all. But in recent decades, we’ve been bombarded with warnings that maternal cannabis use increases the risk of behavior disorders and ADHD in children. Scary stuff for any parent-to-be, right?

Well, hold onto your bongs, folks, because a new study is challenging that narrative. This isn’t some small-scale research either – we’re talking about a massive study involving over 100,000 participants. And guess what? They found no link between maternal cannabis use and an increased risk of ADHD or behavior disorders in offspring.

Now, before you start planning a pregnancy hotbox party, let’s take a deeper look at this study and what it really means. We’ll also compare the risk profiles of cannabis to some of the currently accepted medications for morning sickness. Because let’s face it, those pharma-approved pills aren’t exactly risk-free either.

So strap in, dear readers. We’re about to embark on a journey through the complex world of pregnancy, cannabis, and the ever-evolving landscape of medical research. It’s time to separate fact from fiction and give expectant mothers the information they need to make informed decisions about their health and the health of their future little ones.

First off, let’s talk scope. This isn’t some rinky-dink study done in a college dorm room (though those can be fun too). We’re looking at a behemoth of a research project that makes most studies look like a kiddie pool next to the Pacific Ocean.

The researchers, a team of brainiacs from Kaiser Permanente Northern California, the University of California, and The Permanente Medical Group, analyzed data from a whopping 141,570 children born to 117,130 pregnant individuals. That’s more people than the entire population of Topeka, Kansas, folks. The study covered births from 2011 to 2018, giving us a solid chunk of time to work with.

Now, here’s where it gets interesting. Of these 117,130 pregnant individuals, 4.6% screened positive for cannabis use during early pregnancy. That’s about 5,388 cannabis-using moms-to-be, if my back-of-the-rolling-paper math is correct.

So, what did they find? Hold onto your hats, because this might blow your mind: maternal prenatal cannabis use was not associated with an increased risk of offspring developing ADHD or disruptive behavior disorders (DBD). In fact, the adjusted hazard ratio for ADHD was 0.84, which is science-speak for “Nope, no link here.”

But wait, it gets even more intriguing. When it came to DBD, they actually found an inverse association. The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.83, suggesting that children of cannabis-using mothers were slightly less likely to develop disruptive behavior disorders. Now, before you start recommending pot for pregnant ladies, remember that correlation doesn’t equal causation. But it’s certainly food for thought.

Let’s hear it straight from the horse’s mouth. The study concludes, and I quote, “Maternal prenatal cannabis use was not associated with an increased risk of offspring ADHD or DBD.” That’s about as clear as it gets, folks.

Now, why is this important? Well, for starters, it challenges the long-held belief that cannabis use during pregnancy is a one-way ticket to behavioral issues for the kid. This study, with its massive sample size and rigorous methodology, provides some serious scientific firepower to counter those claims.

But here’s the kicker: the researchers aren’t saying “Go ahead and blaze it, preggo!” They’re quick to point out that while these findings are significant, they don’t suggest that marijuana use during pregnancy is risk-free. There’s still a lot we don’t know about the long-term effects of prenatal cannabis exposure.

What this study does do is open the door for more nuanced, evidence-based discussions about cannabis use during pregnancy. It gives us a solid foundation to question some of the fear-mongering that’s been going on and to push for more research in this area.

In the world of science, a study like this is like dropping a boulder in a pond. The ripples are going to be felt for a long time, potentially influencing everything from public health policies to individual decisions made by expectant mothers.

Now, I’m not here to bash Big Pharma (well, maybe a little), but let’s take a look at some of the common medications prescribed for morning sickness. It’s like a chemical alphabet soup, and the side effects? Well, they might just make you want to puke.

First up, we’ve got Doxylamine. Sounds fancy, right? It’s an antihistamine that’s often combined with vitamin B6 to combat nausea. But here’s the kicker: it can cause drowsiness, dizziness, and even movement disorders. Because that’s exactly what a pregnant woman needs – to feel like she’s stumbling around in a fog.

Then there’s Metoclopramide, a “promotility agent” that sounds like something you’d use to clean your toilet. It stimulates stomach and bowel movement, which is great if you want to spend even more time in the bathroom. Side effects? Oh, just little things like depression, anxiety, and tardive dyskinesia – a fun little condition that causes uncontrollable movements. Lovely.

For the overachievers in morning sickness, we’ve got Ondansetron. It’s often prescribed for hyperemesis gravidarum, which is fancy doctor-speak for “holy crap, I can’t stop puking.” But watch out for those pesky side effects like headaches, constipation, and oh yeah, potential heart rhythm problems.

Now, let’s talk about Mirtazapine. It’s an antidepressant that they pull out when nothing else works. Because apparently, the solution to not being able to keep food down is to take a drug that can cause increased appetite and weight gain. Makes perfect sense, right?

And for the grand finale, we’ve got Corticosteroids. These bad boys are reserved for severe cases, probably because their potential side effects read like a medical textbook’s index. We’re talking increased risk of gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and low birth weight. But hey, at least you’re not nauseous anymore!

Now, here’s where things get interesting. The LD-50 (that’s the dose that’s lethal for 50% of test subjects) for these drugs ranges from about 500mg/kg to 1000mg/kg in rats. For cannabis? It’s estimated to be around 1260mg/kg when orally ingested. That’s higher than any of these pharmaceutical options.

So, let me get this straight. We’re okay with giving pregnant women drugs that can cause everything from movement disorders to depression to potential heart problems, but a plant that’s been used for centuries to combat nausea is off-limits? A plant that, I might add, has a higher LD-50 than these lab-created concoctions?

Look, I’m not saying cannabis is risk-free during pregnancy. We need more research, and every woman should make an informed decision with her doctor. But when I see the list of side effects for these “approved” medications, I can’t help but wonder: are we really making decisions based on health and safety, or are we stuck in a prohibition-era mindset?

It’s time we start asking some hard questions about our approach to morning sickness treatment. Why are we so quick to reach for the prescription pad when Mother Nature might have a gentler solution? Why is it okay to give pregnant women drugs with laundry lists of side effects, but not one that grows out of the ground?

I don’t have all the answers, folks. But I do know this: when it comes to pregnancy and cannabis, we need to cut through the fear-mongering and look at the facts. Because at the end of the day, what matters most is the health and well-being of mom and baby. And sometimes, the best medicine might just be the one that’s been growing in our backyards all along.

Source:

https://themarijuanaherald.com/2024/10/study-of-over-100000-finds-

maternal-marijuana-use-not-associated-with-increased-risk-of-adhd-or-behavior-disorders-in-children/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39400201/

PREGNANT AND CANNABIS, READ ON..

THC IS A RISK FOR PREGNANT WOMEN, TRUE OR FALSE?

Source link

Cannabis News

Trump’s Not So Cannabis Friendly Cabinet Picks

Published

2 days ago

November 30, 2024

admin

trump votes on marijuana

President-elect Donald Trump’s key appointments for roles in the Department of Justice, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have sparked significant concern among cannabis advocates. Pam Bondi, Dave Weldon, and Dr. Marty Makary—Trump’s picks for Attorney General, CDC Director, and FDA Commissioner, respectively—have all expressed strong opposition to marijuana reform. Throw that in with Trump’s VP, JD Vance, saying that all marijuana is laced with Fentanyl now, and you get the point. Their collective stances suggest a potential federal pivot toward stricter enforcement of cannabis laws and a rollback of progress made in marijuana legalization efforts.

Trump’s AG Pick Pam Bondi on Marijuana

President-elect Donald Trump’s reported consideration of former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi for the role of U.S. Attorney General has drawn attention to her strong conservative stance on a range of issues, including her opposition to marijuana reform. As Florida’s top legal official from 2011 to 2019, Bondi consistently opposed the expansion of marijuana access, including medical cannabis, and worked to limit legalization efforts in the state.

Bondi was a vocal critic of Florida’s 2014 medical marijuana ballot initiative, which sought to legalize cannabis for patients with debilitating conditions. She argued that the measure’s language was too broad and could lead to widespread abuse, effectively turning the state into what she described as the “Wild West” of marijuana use. Her opposition contributed to the initiative falling short of the required 60% voter approval threshold. Although medical marijuana was later approved by Florida voters in 2016, Bondi maintained her cautious stance on the issue, emphasizing the need for strict regulations.

As Attorney General, Bondi also supported law enforcement actions targeting illegal marijuana operations and echoed concerns about cannabis being a potential gateway drug. If appointed as U.S. Attorney General, Bondi’s past actions suggest she could support stricter federal enforcement of marijuana laws, potentially clashing with states that have implemented broader legalization policies. Her approach aligns with a more traditional, anti-reform perspective on cannabis, signaling potential challenges for advocates of marijuana legalization under her leadership.

Trump’s Pick for CDC Director Claims about Marijuana

President-elect Donald Trump’s selection of former Congressman Dave Weldon (R-FL) to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) could mark a significant shift in the agency’s stance on marijuana reform. While the CDC’s role in shaping federal cannabis policy is limited, it has recently taken steps to improve public access to information on marijuana use. Weldon, however, is a staunch opponent of reform, with a congressional record that includes voting against measures protecting state medical cannabis programs and supporting resolutions opposing medical marijuana legalization.

During his time in Congress from 1995 to 2009, Weldon repeatedly argued against marijuana’s medical value. In a 2001 House subcommittee hearing, he dismissed medical cannabis as a “veiled attempt to legalize” recreational drug use, accusing advocates of exploiting vulnerable patients. As a physician, he claimed to have seen no legitimate medical indications for marijuana and suggested that smoking the drug could lead to lung cancer. Weldon also criticized the lack of global scientific research validating cannabis’s medical potential, arguing that its absence undermined claims of its efficacy.

Weldon has also supported the gateway drug theory, asserting that marijuana use often precedes harder drug abuse despite the difficulty of proving causation. He maintained that interviews with heroin users indicate many began with cannabis, which he cited as evidence of its gateway effect. If confirmed, Weldon’s leadership could steer the CDC toward a more conservative approach to cannabis, potentially reversing recent efforts to provide balanced information on the drug’s uses and risks.

Trump’s FDA Pick Thinks Marijuana Is a Drug That Causes Heart And Mental Health Problems

President-elect Donald Trump’s choice for Food and Drug Administration (FDA) commissioner, Dr Marty Makary, has expressed skepticism about medical marijuana, citing concerns about its links to cardiovascular problems and mental health risks in youth. He has also promoted the gateway drug theory, suggesting marijuana use can lead to the consumption of more dangerous substances. As the FDA plays a crucial role in shaping federal cannabis policy, Makary’s stance could influence the agency’s approach under the incoming administration.

Makary, a surgeon and medical commentator, has argued that modern cannabis is far more potent than in the past, raising potential health risks, particularly for adolescents. Speaking on the mindbodygreen podcast, he highlighted research suggesting a significant increase in the risk of psychosis later in life for teens who use marijuana. While he clarified that he was not making a statement about legalization itself, he emphasized that describing marijuana as entirely safe is inconsistent with scientific evidence. These views are also detailed in his book, Blind Spots, where he challenges claims that marijuana is harmless or not a gateway drug.

Additionally, Makary has disputed economic arguments for legalization, particularly the idea that it undermines illicit drug trafficking. He has contended that organized crime groups, including cartels and Chinese criminal organizations, continue to dominate marijuana sales in states like California, Oklahoma, and Kentucky. Makary further criticized these groups for exploiting workers in what he described as “a modern form of slavery on U.S. soil.” His appointment suggests a potentially more cautious and critical approach to marijuana policy within the FDA.

HOW TRUMP IS MAKING YOU PAY MORE FOR CANNABIS, READ ON..

TRUMP IS MAKING YOU PAY MORE FOR WEED ALREADY, CLICK HERE!

Source link

Cannabis News

Safe to Fly with Marijuana Now? -The DEA is Banned from Random Airport Bag Searches after DOJ Ruling

Published

3 days ago

November 29, 2024

admin

dea airport searches

In a significant move that has sent ripples through law enforcement and civil rights circles alike, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has been banned from conducting random searches at airports. This decision follows a scathing report from the Justice Department that unveiled a troubling pattern of misconduct within the agency. The findings not only highlight issues of corruption but also raise serious concerns about civil liberties and the ethical conduct of law enforcement officials.

Background of the DEA’s Airport Searches

The DEA has long been involved in drug interdiction efforts at airports, often collaborating with other law enforcement agencies to combat drug trafficking. Their operations typically involve random searches of passengers and their belongings, ostensibly to deter drug smuggling and ensure public safety. However, these practices have come under scrutiny in recent years, with critics arguing that they infringe on individual rights and disproportionately target specific demographics.

The Justice Department Report

The Justice Department’s report, which was the result of an extensive investigation, revealed alarming details about the DEA’s airport search practices. Key findings included:

Racial Profiling: One of the most troubling aspects of the report was evidence suggesting that DEA agents engaged in racial profiling. The investigation found that certain groups were disproportionately targeted based on characteristics such as race or ethnicity, leading to accusations of systemic bias within the agency.

Targeting Last-Minute Travelers: The investigation revealed a pattern where individuals who purchased tickets shortly before departure were more likely to be searched. This tactic raised alarms about potential violations of civil rights, as it suggested that agents were using arbitrary criteria to determine who merited further scrutiny.

Implications for Civil Liberties

The findings of the Justice Department report have profound implications for civil liberties in the United States. Random searches at airports are already a contentious issue, with many arguing that they violate Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. The additional revelations regarding racial profiling and inadequate documentation further exacerbate these concerns.

Erosion of Trust in Law Enforcement

One of the most significant consequences of this situation is the erosion of trust between communities and law enforcement agencies. When individuals feel they are being targeted based on their race or other arbitrary factors, it creates an environment of fear and suspicion. This distrust can hinder effective policing, as community cooperation is essential for successful crime prevention and resolution.

Legal Challenges Ahead

In light of these findings, legal challenges against the DEA’s practices are likely to emerge. Civil rights organizations may seek to hold the agency accountable for its actions, potentially leading to lawsuits that could reshape how law enforcement operates at airports and beyond. Such legal battles could set important precedents regarding the balance between public safety and individual rights.

The Response from Law Enforcement Agencies

In response to the Justice Department’s findings, several law enforcement agencies have begun reevaluating their own practices related to airport security and drug interdiction efforts. The DEA has announced an internal review aimed at addressing the issues raised in the report, but skepticism remains regarding whether meaningful change will occur.

Calls for Reform

Advocates for reform are calling for comprehensive changes within the DEA and other agencies involved in airport security. Suggested reforms include:

Enhanced Training: Law enforcement personnel should receive training focused on implicit bias, cultural sensitivity, and constitutional rights to ensure they conduct searches fairly and without prejudice.

Transparency Initiatives: Increasing transparency around search practices can help rebuild trust between law enforcement agencies and communities. Public reporting on search statistics, including demographic data, could provide insight into potential biases.

The Future of Airport Security

The unfolding situation regarding the DEA’s ban on random airport searches raises critical questions about the future of airport security in America. As concerns about terrorism and drug trafficking intensify, the challenge of balancing safety with civil liberties becomes increasingly complex. The Justice Department’s report, which revealed significant issues such as corruption and racial profiling within the DEA, underscores the urgent need for reform in how security measures are implemented at airports. While advanced technologies, including AI and biometric systems, promise to enhance security protocols, they also raise important questions about privacy rights and potential biases in their application. The reliance on personal data for threat detection necessitates stringent safeguards to protect individual privacy while ensuring effective security measures.Moving forward, it is essential for policymakers, law enforcement agencies, and communities to engage in collaborative discussions aimed at creating transparent and accountable airport security practices. This dialogue must prioritize both effective threat detection and the protection of civil liberties to foster public trust. Implementing risk-based approaches that allow for tailored screening procedures can help address safety concerns without infringing on individual rights. Additionally, ongoing training for law enforcement personnel on implicit bias and constitutional rights will be crucial in ensuring that security measures are applied fairly. As we navigate these challenges, a balanced approach that respects civil liberties while enhancing airport security will be vital in shaping a safer and more just environment for all travelers.

Technological Innovations

One potential avenue for improving airport security without infringing on individual rights is through technological innovations. Enhanced screening technologies, such as advanced imaging systems or artificial intelligence-based analytics, could reduce reliance on random searches while still effectively identifying threats.

Community Engagement

Another important aspect of reforming airport security practices is community engagement. Law enforcement agencies must work collaboratively with community members to develop policies that prioritize safety while respecting individual rights. Engaging with diverse communities can help build trust and ensure that security measures are equitable.

Conclusion

The ban on random airport searches by the DEA represents a crucial turning point in the ongoing discourse about law enforcement practices in the United States. Following a comprehensive report from the Justice Department that exposed serious issues related to corruption, racial profiling, and insufficient oversight within this key drug enforcement agency, it has become imperative for policymakers, law enforcement officials, and community members to engage in meaningful discussions on how to effectively balance public safety with civil liberties. Emphasizing transparency, accountability, and community involvement will be essential in striving for a more equitable system that honors individual rights while addressing public safety concerns. This situation serves as a stark reminder of the need for vigilance in safeguarding our freedoms and ensuring that law enforcement operates ethically and responsibly. As reforms are proposed and enacted, it is vital to prioritize civil liberties in conversations surrounding law enforcement practices at airports and beyond.

FLY WITH WEED? READ ON…

FLYING WITH CANNABIS, WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW?

Source link

Cannabis News

A Blend of Science, Culture, and Opportunity

Published

4 days ago

November 28, 2024

admin

Exploring the Cannabis Revolution: A Blend of Science, Culture, and Opportunity

The global cannabis industry has been undergoing a dramatic transformation in recent years. Once shrouded in controversy, cannabis is now at the forefront of discussions surrounding health, wellness, and economic growth. From medical breakthroughs to recreational trends, the cannabis plant has proven its versatility and potential in numerous domains. This burgeoning industry is reshaping societal perspectives and creating opportunities that were once deemed improbable.

The Evolution of Cannabis Use and Acceptance

Cannabis has been used for centuries in various cultures for its medicinal and recreational properties. However, the stigma surrounding it, largely influenced by 20th-century prohibition laws, significantly hindered its mainstream acceptance. Today, the narrative has shifted dramatically. Research studies highlight cannabis’s therapeutic potential in managing chronic pain, epilepsy, anxiety, and other health conditions. This growing body of evidence has played a crucial role in reshaping public opinion and government policies worldwide.

As legalization spreads across countries and states, cannabis has transitioned from an illicit substance to a lucrative industry. With a focus on quality control, ethical practices, and education, cannabis entrepreneurs are working diligently to ensure their products meet high standards while dispelling lingering misconceptions.

Diverse Opportunities in Online Spaces

The cannabis boom is mirrored in the digital realm, where e-commerce platforms and online communities thrive. Cannabis.net, for instance, exemplifies how digital platforms connect users with dispensaries, educational resources, and like-minded enthusiasts. These platforms are instrumental in reducing the knowledge gap and advocating for cannabis’s many benefits.

Interestingly, the online world has become a melting pot for diverse industries. For example, online casinos are capitalizing on the digital shift, offering unique experiences to players worldwide. Many of these platforms, known for offering fast withdrawals, are aligning with modern consumer expectations of convenience and efficiency. This focus on seamless transactions and user satisfaction resonates with cannabis consumers who value similar qualities in their purchasing experiences. Both sectors reflect the broader trend of digitization and consumer-centric innovation.

The Economic Boom of Legal Cannabis

Legal cannabis markets have catalyzed significant economic benefits, from job creation to tax revenue. Industries related to cultivation, manufacturing, and retail are flourishing. This economic impact extends beyond the direct cannabis market, fueling ancillary industries such as technology, marketing, and legal services.

Moreover, cannabis tourism has emerged as a dynamic sector, with destinations like Amsterdam and Denver becoming hotspots for cannabis enthusiasts. Events like cannabis expos and educational tours not only boost local economies but also foster global conversations around responsible use and regulation.

Cannabis and Wellness: A Holistic Approach

Cannabis’s role in health and wellness cannot be overstated. Beyond its medicinal properties, many are turning to cannabis products such as CBD oils, tinctures, and edibles as part of their holistic lifestyle. These products are often marketed for stress relief, improved sleep, and enhanced focus, making them popular among diverse age groups.

Additionally, cannabis is influencing the beauty and skincare industries, with products containing cannabinoids like CBD claiming to offer anti-inflammatory and anti-aging benefits. Such developments underscore cannabis’s versatility and its ability to integrate into everyday life seamlessly.

Challenges and the Road Ahead

While the cannabis industry is undoubtedly promising, it faces several challenges. Regulatory inconsistencies, lack of standardized testing, and lingering stigmas remain significant hurdles. Additionally, global legalization is progressing at varying paces, creating disparities in market accessibility and innovation.

On the business front, competition is fierce. Entrepreneurs and companies must focus on differentiation, quality, and education to thrive in this dynamic landscape. Transparency in operations and a commitment to social responsibility are also critical factors in building trust with consumers and stakeholders.

Conclusion

The cannabis industry is an exciting frontier, blending tradition with innovation. As science continues to unravel the plant’s potential, and as societal attitudes evolve, cannabis is poised to become a staple in medicine, wellness, and recreation. Platforms like Cannabis.net are pivotal in this journey, offering a gateway for education, advocacy, and connection.

Whether it’s through physical dispensaries or online marketplaces, the cannabis revolution represents a broader cultural shift towards acceptance and exploration. The interplay between industries, such as cannabis and digital gaming, highlights the interconnectedness of today’s global market. Together, they reflect the values of convenience, innovation, and a consumer-first approach—a trend that is likely to shape the future across multiple sectors.