Connect with us

Cannabis News

Smoking Weed Can Increase Penis Length and Girth

Published

on


cannabis makes your penis bigger

Smoking weed can increase penis length? Nope, not satire!

I may have pulled a fast one on you with that title, but hear me out – there’s method to this madness. Today, we’re diving deep into a fascinating case study of misinformation, gullibility, and the importance of critical thinking in the age of clickbait headlines and pseudo-science.

Our subject of scrutiny? A seemingly legitimate scientific paper with the impressive title, “The Perceived Effect of Cannabis Use on Penile Growth in Humans.” This gem, published on Clinmedjournals.org, has been making the rounds, cited by various publications as cold, hard fact. There’s just one tiny problem – it’s complete and utter nonsense.

Now, before you start frantically Googling “nearest dispensary” or “how to grow weed,” take a deep breath. If you read this study closely (which, let’s be honest, most people don’t), you’ll quickly realize it’s a masterclass in satire. That’s right, this “scientific paper” is about as real as my chances of winning a slam dunk contest.

But here’s the kicker – and the reason we need to talk about this: Many people fell for it hook, line, and sinker. It’s a stark reminder of how easily misinformation can spread when we don’t take the time to fact-check or think critically about what we’re reading.

So, buckle up, buttercup. We’re about to embark on a journey through the smoke and mirrors of this faux study. We’ll dissect how it managed to fool so many, explore the red flags that give away its satirical nature, and discuss the broader implications for how we consume and share information.

By the end of this article, you’ll be equipped with the tools to spot similar bull… err, misinformation in the wild. And who knows? You might even have a good laugh along the way. After all, if we can’t chuckle at the absurdity of a study claiming weed makes your johnson grow, what can we laugh at?

Let’s dive in and separate fact from fiction, shall we?

At first glance, “The Perceived Effect of Cannabis Use on Penile Growth in Humans” appears to be a bona fide scientific study. It’s got all the trappings of legitimacy: a roster of authors from various universities, a proper abstract, and formatting that would make any academic journal proud. The study even sports an impressive list of references, making it seem like a well-researched piece of scholarship.

The authors’ affiliations read like a Who’s Who of obscure yet official-sounding institutions. From the “Santo Daime Ayahuasca University” to the “Central University of Michigan Medical Phecomagnetism,” these names carry just enough gravitas to make a casual reader nod along. And let’s not forget the cherry on top – the presence of W.T. Gerbil and R.T. Gerbil from the prestigious “Siberian University of Independent Gerbids.” Who wouldn’t trust a gerbil with their penile growth research?

The study’s use of scientific jargon is particularly convincing. Take this gem, for instance: “Recent studies have suggested that cannabis may influence human penile growth through the activation of specific receptors in the body. The active compounds in cannabis, known as cannabinoids, have been found to bind to receptors in the body known as CB1 and CB2, which are responsible for regulating cell growth and differentiation” [6]. It sounds plausible, doesn’t it? The casual mention of CB1 and CB2 receptors lends an air of scientific credibility that’s hard to dismiss outright.

The paper even goes so far as to discuss the ethical considerations of their research, stating, “The ethical considerations of the survey were addressed through a thorough review and approval process by an institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee.” This attention to ethical protocols further sells the illusion of a legitimate study.

Perhaps the most compelling aspect of this satirical masterpiece is its presentation of “results.” The authors claim, “The survey results of the sample of 10,000 men aged 18-35 suggest that most participants, approximately 60%, think that cannabis use helped increase the size of their penis.” They even throw in a p-value for good measure: “Results show that individuals with a higher education level were significantly more likely to claim that cannabis increased their penis size compared to those with a lower education level (p < 0.05).”

The study’s placement on a legitimate-looking website, Clinmedjournals.org, is the final touch that sells this fraud completely. The site’s professional design and the presence of other seemingly legitimate studies create a context of credibility that makes it easy to accept this study at face value.

In crafting this elaborate hoax, the authors have demonstrated a keen understanding of how scientific papers are structured and presented. They’ve mimicked the language, format, and conventions of genuine research so effectively that it’s easy to see how readers might be fooled, especially if they’re only skimming or if they lack familiarity with scientific literature.

This level of detail and commitment to the bit raises an intriguing possibility: could the authors be real researchers conducting a meta-experiment on information consumption and critical thinking in the digital age? Regardless of their true identities or motivations, they’ve certainly succeeded in creating a compelling facsimile of a scientific study.

As we peel back the layers of this satirical onion, it becomes clear just how skilfully crafted this deception is. But fear not, dear readers. In our next section, we’ll dive into the red flags that give away this study’s true nature, arming you with the tools to spot similar falsehoods in the wild.

Let’s pull back the curtain on this elaborate ruse and expose the dead giveaways that scream, “This is satire!” Trust me, I nearly fell for it myself, but once you see these red flags, you’ll wonder how anyone could have missed them.

First up, let’s talk about those “prestigious” universities. At first glance, they might sound legit, but take a closer look:

  1. Santo Daime Ayahuasca University, Spain
  2. Tanned Balls University, Spain
  3. Central University of Charlatanery of Cochabamba, Spain
  4. New Caledonia Junk Products Sales University, Spain
  5. Siberian University of Independent Gerbids, Spain
  6. Central University of Michigan Medical Phecomagnetism, Spain

Notice anything odd? Besides the fact that apparently every obscure university is located in Spain, we’ve got gems like “Tanned Balls University” and the “Siberian University of Independent Gerbids.” I don’t know about you, but I’ve never met a gerbil with a PhD.

The conclusion section is where the satirical nature of this “study” really shines. It starts off sounding somewhat plausible, but quickly descends into absurdity. The authors claim, “It appears that paying drug dealers with Dragon Ball cards may also have an impact on these findings.” I’m sorry, what? Unless Goku has some hidden penis-enlarging powers we don’t know about, this is clearly nonsense.

But wait, there’s more! The study casually mentions that 16.5% of subjects reported that cannabis not only made their penis grow but also their nose. Pinocchio, is that you?

The consumption methods reported in the study are equally ridiculous. Apparently, 78.2% of subjects preferred “smoking cigarettes mixed with carrots.” I don’t know about you, but I’ve never seen anyone light up a carrot.

Perhaps the most glaring example of satire is in the statistical analysis. The authors claim to have used “TannedBallsComputer® SPSS, version 111.0” for their analysis. I hate to break it to you, but that’s not a real software package.

I have to admit, when I first came across this study, I was ready to write an article about its findings. The title was catchy, the abstract seemed plausible, and hey, who doesn’t love a good story about unexpected benefits from cannabis use? It wasn’t until I dug deeper that I realized I was being played like a fiddle. That’s when I decided to pivot and write about the hoax itself instead.

This experience serves as a humbling reminder of how easy it is to be fooled by something that looks legitimate at first glance. It’s a testament to the power of presentation and the importance of critical reading. Even as someone who prides myself on being skeptical and analytical, I nearly fell for it. It just goes to show that we all need to stay on our toes when consuming information, especially in this age of clickbait and misinformation.

In our next segment, we’ll look at some publications that weren’t as lucky as I was. These folks took the bait hook, line, and sinker, republishing the “findings” as legitimate science. It’s a sobering reminder of how easily false information can spread when we don’t take the time to fact-check and think critically.

It seems our satirical study on cannabis and penile growth has made quite a splash in certain corners of the internet. Let’s take a closer look at some of the publications that took the bait, hook, line, and sinker.

First up, we have “Advances in Medical, Dental and Health Sciences,” a seemingly reputable journal that proudly displays the study’s title and even quotes one of its more sensational findings. The fact that a publication with “Medical” and “Health Sciences” in its name couldn’t spot this obvious satire is, quite frankly, alarming. It makes you wonder about the rigor of their peer-review process, doesn’t it?

Next, we see ResearchGate, a platform widely used by academics and researchers, hosting this study. While ResearchGate itself isn’t vouching for the study’s validity, its presence on the site lends it an air of legitimacy that it absolutely doesn’t deserve. This highlights the potential dangers of platforms that allow easy sharing of “research” without robust fact-checking mechanisms.

Perhaps most concerning is Kannabia, a cannabis-focused blog that not only fell for the study but ran with it, asking the provocative question, “Does marijuana make your penis bigger?” This is a prime example of how misinformation can spread when it aligns with what people want to hear or believe.

While fortunately, the number of publications that fell for this hoax seems limited, the fact that any did is cause for concern. It raises serious questions about the standards of these outlets and their commitment to fact-checking and critical analysis.

In my view, this “study” serves as a brilliant experiment in how misinformation works. It demonstrates how easily sensationalist claims about hot-button topics can be adopted and spread, especially when they align with existing biases or desires. The cannabis community, always eager for positive news about their favorite plant, seems particularly susceptible to this kind of misinformation.

This incident serves as a stark reminder of why we must always wear our critical thinking caps, especially in the age of AI. With tools like GPT-3 and DALL-E, creating convincing fake studies, complete with plausible-sounding methodologies and conclusions, is easier than ever. If I wanted to, I could craft a “study” on the effects of cannabis on breast size tomorrow, complete with fake university affiliations and sciency-sounding jargon. And I guarantee you, someone, somewhere would pick it up and run with it as fact.

The ease with which this misinformation spreads is a testament to the power of confirmation bias. People are more likely to believe and share information that confirms their existing beliefs or desires, often without taking the time to verify its authenticity.

So, dear readers, consider this a wake-up call. Be aware of the content you consume, for not all that glitters is gold – or in this case, not all that claims to make your johnson grow is legit. Question everything, especially if it seems too good (or too outrageous) to be true.

This is why we need to be vigilant, critical, and always ready to dig deeper. In a world where fake news can spread faster than you can say “cannabis-induced penile growth,” it’s up to each of us to be the gatekeepers of truth. Stay skeptical, my friends, and remember – if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

 

DOES YOUR PENIS LOOK BIGGER IF YOU ARE STONED, READ ON…

DOES MARIJANA MAKE YOUR PENIS BIGGER

DOES MARIJUANA MAKE YOUR PENIS LOOK BIGGER?



Source link

Cannabis News

Cannabis Oil Helps Skin Wounds and Cuts Heal Faster According to New Skin Research Report

Published

on

By


cannabis oil for skin care

How Cannabis Oil Helps Skin Wounds Heal Faster, According To Research

 

Cannabis in its many forms, from edibles to inhaled weed, tinctures to oils and so much more, have been proven to be beneficial for its countless therapeutic benefits.


Typically, cannabis is ingested in the human body. It’s smoked, eaten, drank, or applied underneath the tongue. These methods allow cannabis to be metabolized by various systems in the human body, thus enabling the cannabinoids to do their healing work from the inside out. But the use of cannabis topicals is also a fast-growing segment.

 

Weed topicals and transdermals, such as patches, oils, balms, and salves, infused with cannabinoids, have been shown to have healing properties for skin applications as well. Cannabidiol (CBD) in particular, possesses incredible anti-inflammatory properties that aid in the healing of wounds, ulcers, localized pain, bacterial infections, and so much more.

 

The results of a recent scientific review were published, initially by Marijuana Moment, backing up the growing body of research that cannabis oil is effective for a variety of applications though this one focuses on skin wounds. For the report, investigators from educational institutions in Thailand and India analyzed the effect of cannabis oil on reactive oxygen species (ROS) when wounds are healing. These chemicals promote damage in tissues and cells, causing a longer time to heal wounds.


“Increased ROS levels can hinder wound healing by exacerbating inflammation and cellular damage,” says the paper. “CBD’s antioxidant properties mitigate these effects, fostering a more conducive environment for tissue regeneration,” it reads. The authors also found that cannabis oil was helpful in reducing the oxidative damage caused by ROS, thereby improving antioxidant mechanisms in the wound, which has the potential to speed up wound healing.

 

“Cannabis oil, especially its primary bioactive constituents, CBD and THC, demonstrates considerable potential in facilitating skin wound healing by modifying oxidative stress via the regulation of reactive oxygen species,” reads the research.  In summary, the excellent antioxidant properties of CBD work well to mitigate the negative effects of ROS, promoting tissue regeneration. The authors also acknowledge the analgesic and antibacterial properties of marijuana, which contributes to a reduction in microbial load.

Read up below about the benefits of transdermal cannabis application and its benefits for various skin diseases.

CBD Topicals Work Better Than Conventional Meds For Skin Ulcers

 

In a 2023 study out of Italy, researchers found that a CBD topical was more effective in addressing wound pain and speeding up wound healing among patients with skin ulcers caused by scleroderma. The randomized trial data, which was published in Advances in Skin and Wound Care, specifically focuses on scleroderma ulcers, a rare autoimmune condition characterized by skin tightening and narrowing of blood vessels.

 

For the study, Italian researchers analyzed the effects of topical CBD oils compared to conventional treatments. A group of 25 patients with digital ulcers (in the fingertips) were studied; they were randomly chosen and assigned to use CBD for one month while 20 other patients were prescribed to take conventional therapeutic medications.

 

They found that the participants who were given CBD observed more significant pain relief and more efficient wound healing compared to those in the control group.


“Although mean wound-related pain NRS (numeric rating scale) scores did not differ between CBD-treated patients and control patients at baseline, their mean scores differed significantly after 1 month,” wrote the researchers. More particularly, the patients who took CBD saw a pain score decrease of 29% over the course of the study, while those who were given conventional meds only saw a 6% decrease.

Topical CBD Effective For Skin Cancer

 

In a case report of a 64-year-old woman who had a medical history of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), topical application of 20% CBD ointment was found to be effective in treating the cancerous lesion.

 

The investigators involved, from the University of California at Riverside and UC Davis, wrote a summary of their findings after analyzing the woman, writing: “She self-initiated treatment with topical cannabinoid oil, twice daily, and the lesion completely resolved within four weeks. Several prior biopsy-confirmed squamous cell carcinomas on her dorsal hands also completely regressed after similar treatment with topical cannabinoid oil,” they wrote.

 

“Both malignant cancer and chronic dermatitis completely resolved within four weeks of twice-daily treatment. We attribute the clearance of her skin tumor to the cannabidiol,” they wrote. However, they suggest more investigation into the benefits of cannabidiol for squamous cell carcinoma and other non-melanoma skin cancer types.

 

Benefits of Topical Application


Whether for skin wounds, ulcers, skin cancer, or pain, topical delivery of cannabinoids is an excellent way to benefit from its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. After all, the skin is well-known for its abundance of cannabinoid receptors, both CB1 and CB2. These are particularly found in skin cells including the sebaceous glands, keratinocytes, and even various sensory neurons. Because of the direct receptor expression in the skin, this makes it simpler for cannabinoids to act directly on skin issues.

 

It must be said that topical or transdermal application of cannabinoid products also bypasses gastrointestinal metabolism, a process also known as prevention of first-pass metabolism. This results in a more stable level of cannabinoid and longer-lasting benefits without the patient having to experience psychoactive properties that are linked to smoking, consuming edibles, drinking, and other oral routes of administration. This is why, even if you apply THC-infused topicals to the skin, you won’t get high.

 

Conclusion

 

Marijuana topicals possess a wide range of benefits for patients of skin diseases. Because of cannabinoids’ anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antibacterial properties, it’s become easier to understand how it can contribute to such powerful wound healing and pain relief – oftentimes, even more effective than conventional medications!

 

CANNABIS AND SKIN CARE, READ ON…

CBD FOR SKIN wounds

CBD FOR SKIN CARE AND WOUNDS, HERE IS WHAT WE KNOW!



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

If You Smoke Weed around Your Kids, Will They Test Postive for THC?

Published

on

By


smoking cannabis around kids and thc testing

The legalization and decriminalization of cannabis in many parts of the world have sparked widespread debate about its societal, medical, and personal implications. While much of the focus has been on adult usage and its effects, an often-overlooked issue is how secondhand cannabis smoke impacts children living in homes where the drug is consumed. Recent research has revealed that children exposed to cannabis smoke in their homes are at risk of testing positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive compound in cannabis. This finding raises significant concerns about the health, safety, and developmental outcomes for these children.

 

In this article, we will delve into the findings of recent studies, explore the potential health risks associated with secondhand cannabis smoke, and discuss broader social and legal implications. We will also examine how parents and caregivers can mitigate these risks to protect children from inadvertent exposure.

 

The Science Behind Secondhand Cannabis Smoke

 

Secondhand smoke refers to the involuntary inhalation of smoke exhaled by a smoker or released from a burning substance. While tobacco secondhand smoke has been extensively studied and linked to numerous health issues, secondhand cannabis smoke is a relatively new area of research. Cannabis smoke contains many of the same harmful chemicals as tobacco smoke, including carcinogens, fine particulate matter, and respiratory irritants. However, cannabis smoke also contains cannabinoids like THC and cannabidiol (CBD), which can have psychoactive or physiological effects when absorbed into the body.

 

When cannabis is smoked indoors or in enclosed spaces, it creates an environment where non-smokers, including children, can inadvertently inhale these substances. Unlike adults who may choose to avoid such environments, children are particularly vulnerable because they lack agency over their living conditions and are often in close proximity to their caregivers.

 

Recent Research Findings

A groundbreaking study conducted in San Diego County, California, examined whether children living in homes where cannabis is smoked test positive for THC exposure. Researchers collected urine samples from children aged 0 to 13 years who were brought to pediatric clinics for routine care. Caregivers were also surveyed about their cannabis use habits, including whether they smoked indoors or outdoors.

 

The results were striking: children living in homes where cannabis was smoked had five times higher odds of testing positive for THC compared to those living in non-smoking households. This finding indicates that secondhand exposure to cannabis smoke is not just a theoretical risk but a measurable reality.

 

 Key Findings

 

  • THC Detection: Detectable levels of THC metabolites were found in the urine samples of children exposed to secondhand cannabis smoke. This suggests that even passive exposure can lead to absorption of psychoactive compounds into a child’s system.

 

 

 

 

Health Risks Associated with Secondhand Cannabis Smoke

 

The presence of THC metabolites in children’s systems raises serious concerns about the potential health risks they face. While research on this specific topic is still emerging, existing studies on secondhand tobacco smoke and direct cannabis use provide valuable insights.

 

1. Respiratory Issues

 

Cannabis smoke contains fine particulate matter that can irritate the respiratory system. Prolonged exposure may lead to:

 

  • Increased risk of asthma attacks

  •  Chronic bronchitis or other respiratory conditions.

  • Reduced lung function over time.

 

Children’s lungs are still developing, making them particularly susceptible to damage from inhaled irritants.

 

 2. Cognitive and Developmental Concerns

 

THC is known to affect brain function by interacting with cannabinoid receptors in the central nervous system. While most studies focus on direct cannabis use during adolescence or pregnancy, there is concern that even low-level exposure through secondhand smoke could impact brain development in young children.

 

Potential risks include:

 

  • Impaired memory and learning abilities.

  • Delayed cognitive development.

  • Behavioral issues such as hyperactivity or attention deficits.

 

3. Chemical Exposure

 

In addition to THC, cannabis smoke contains harmful chemicals such as ammonia, hydrogen cyanide, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). These substances are known carcinogens and can increase the risk of cancer over time.

 

4. Psychoactive Effects

 

Although rare, there have been anecdotal reports of children experiencing mild psychoactive effects after significant exposure to secondhand cannabis smoke. Symptoms may include drowsiness, confusion, or changes in mood.

 

Broader Implications

 

The findings about children’s exposure to secondhand cannabis smoke have far-reaching implications that extend beyond individual households. They touch on public health policies, legal frameworks, and societal attitudes toward cannabis use.

 

1. Public Health Concerns

 

As more states and countries legalize recreational and medicinal cannabis use, public health agencies must address the unintended consequences for vulnerable populations like children. Educational campaigns similar to those targeting tobacco use may be necessary to raise awareness about the risks of secondhand cannabis smoke.

 

 2. Legal Considerations

In some jurisdictions, exposing children to harmful substances like tobacco or drugs can be considered child endangerment. As evidence mounts about the risks of secondhand cannabis smoke, lawmakers may need to consider whether similar protections should apply.

 

For example:

 

These are complex questions that balance individual freedoms with societal responsibility for child welfare.

 

3. Social Stigma vs Awareness

 

Cannabis use has historically been stigmatized due to its association with illegal activity. While legalization aims to reduce stigma and promote responsible use, it is crucial not to overlook potential harms—especially those affecting children who cannot advocate for themselves.

 

 Recommendations for Parents and Caregivers

 

Parents who use cannabis should take proactive steps to minimize their children’s exposure:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 The Need for Further Research

 

While current studies provide valuable insights, much remains unknown about the long-term effects of secondhand cannabis smoke on children’s health and development. Future research should focus on:

 

  • Longitudinal studies tracking exposed children over time.

  • The impact of different levels of exposure (e.g., occasional vs frequent).

  • Interactions between secondhand tobacco and cannabis smoke.

  • Effective interventions for reducing childhood exposure.

 

Conclusion

 

The revelation that children living with cannabis smokers can test positive for THC underscores an urgent need for greater awareness and precautionary measures among parents and caregivers who use cannabis. These findings highlight how changing attitudes toward drug use must be accompanied by thoughtful consideration of its unintended consequences—particularly for vulnerable populations like children. As society continues to navigate the complexities surrounding cannabis legalization, protecting children’s health must remain a top priority. By fostering open dialogue, promoting education, and implementing evidence-based policies, we can ensure that progress in one area does not come at the expense of another generation’s well-being.

 

CANNABIS AROUND KIDS, WHAT ABOUT SURGING ASTHMA? READ ON…

CANNABIS AROUND KIDS FOR ASTHMA

IS CANNABIS CAUSING A SURGE IN KIDS’ ASTHA  CASES IN LEGAL STATES?



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Do You Know Why Alcohol is Legal and Cannabis is Not?

Published

on

By


why is alcohol legal and weed is not

Why is alcohol legal and cannabis isn’t?

As I scrolled through Reddit the other day, I stumbled upon a question that perfectly encapsulates the absurdity of modern drug policy: “Why is alcohol legal but cannabis isn’t?” The responses were predictably brief, with most users simply typing “politics” and calling it a day. While they’re not wrong, this answer barely scratches the surface of a complex and fascinating history of prohibition, propaganda, and profit.

The irony of this situation has always struck me. Here we have alcohol, a substance that according to the CDC claims nearly 140,000 lives annually in the United States alone, enjoying widespread social acceptance and legal status. Meanwhile, cannabis – a plant that has never caused a single documented overdose death – remains federally illegal and stigmatized in many parts of the country.

But to understand this paradox, we need to dig deeper than just “politics.” We need to unravel a tangled web of racial prejudice, corporate interests, government overreach, and one of the most successful propaganda campaigns in human history. The story involves corrupt bureaucrats, lumber barons, pharmaceutical companies, and a systematic effort to demonize both the plant and its users.

So today, I’m going to break down exactly why your neighbor can legally drink themselves into oblivion every weekend, while you might face jail time for possessing a plant that humans have used safely for thousands of years. Trust me, by the time we’re done, you’ll understand just how deep this rabbit hole goes.

Pack yourself a bowl (where legal, of course), get comfortable, and let’s dive into one of the most fascinating examples of how money, power, and prejudice can shape society’s laws and values. The truth behind cannabis prohibition is stranger – and more infuriating – than fiction.

The story of alcohol prohibition in America reads like a cautionary tale about the unintended consequences of moral crusading. It all began with the temperance movement, led by organizations like the Women’s Christian Temperance Union and the Anti-Saloon League. These groups, predominantly composed of Protestant middle-class women, saw alcohol as the root of society’s evils – from domestic violence to poverty. Their intentions weren’t entirely misplaced; alcohol abuse was indeed wreaking havoc on American families.

But as we’ve learned time and time again, making something illegal doesn’t make it disappear – it just drives it underground. When the 18th Amendment kicked in and Prohibition became the law of the land in 1920, something predictable happened: people didn’t stop drinking. Instead, they turned to bootleggers and speakeasies. The unregulated black market that emerged brought with it a host of new problems.

Without any quality control or safety standards, bootleggers started producing moonshine and other spirits in less-than-sanitary conditions. Some of this bathtub gin contained methanol or other toxic substances, leading to blindness, organ failure, and death. It turns out that when you push something into the shadows, it becomes far more dangerous than when it’s regulated and controlled.

But the body count wasn’t just from bad booze. The illegal alcohol trade gave rise to organized crime on a scale America had never seen before. Rival gangs fought bloody turf wars in the streets of Chicago, New York, and other major cities. Those classic scenes of Tommy Gun-wielding mobsters weren’t Hollywood fiction – they were ripped straight from the headlines of the era.

Overseeing this noble experiment in prohibition was a man whose name would later become synonymous with drug criminalization: Harry J. Anslinger. As head of the Department of Prohibition, Anslinger had built his career on enforcing alcohol prohibition. But by the early 1930s, with public opinion turning and repeal looming, he saw the writing on the wall. He needed a new crusade to justify his position and maintain his power.

Enter cannabis – a plant primarily associated with Mexican immigrants and African American jazz musicians. For Anslinger, it was the perfect target: exotic enough to seem threatening, used primarily by marginalized communities, and not yet widely understood by the general public. Little did anyone know that Anslinger’s quest to save his job would set in motion decades of misguided drug policy that we’re still grappling with today.

You know what’s fascinating about history? Sometimes the most impactful changes happen through clever wordplay and manipulation. Take cannabis prohibition, for example. In the 1930s, hemp was on track to become America’s first billion-dollar crop, as reported by Popular Mechanics. Americans knew hemp as the versatile plant that gave them rope, paper, fabric, and even medicine. It was about as controversial as cotton.

So how do you make something so deeply woven into the fabric of American life illegal? Simple – you give it a scary foreign name and associate it with society’s deepest fears. Enter Harry Anslinger’s masterclass in propaganda, backed by the mighty media empire of William Randolph Hearst and the industrial muscle of DuPont.

Anslinger knew he couldn’t demonize “hemp” or “cannabis” – terms Americans associated with industry and medicine. Instead, he latched onto the Mexican slang term “marijuana,” turning it into the boogeyman of his propaganda campaign. This wasn’t just clever marketing; it was calculated racism. Hearst, still bitter about Pancho Villa’s raids on his Mexican timber holdings, was more than happy to help paint a picture of dangerous, marijuana-crazed Mexicans threatening American values.

The propaganda machine worked overtime. Hearst’s newspapers filled their pages with sensational stories about “reefer madness” – tales of marijuana-induced violence, sexual deviancy, and moral corruption. Meanwhile, DuPont, having just patented their synthetic fibers and plastics, was keen to eliminate their biggest natural competitor. It was a perfect storm of corporate interests, racial prejudice, and government overreach.

The result? The 1937 Marihuana Tax Act – a masterpiece of bureaucratic deception. On paper, it didn’t make cannabis illegal; it just required a tax stamp for its cultivation and distribution. The catch? Anslinger, who controlled the stamps, simply refused to issue them. It was like requiring a permit to breathe but never giving anyone the paperwork. Just like that, America’s most valuable crop became a criminal enterprise.

But here’s where it gets really interesting. When World War II broke out and the Navy needed hemp for ropes and parachutes, suddenly all that “reefer madness” propaganda went out the window. The government released their “Hemp for Victory” campaign, encouraging farmers to grow the very plant they’d demonized just years before. Amazing how quickly “dangerous marijuana” became patriotic hemp when it served the war effort.

After the war, though, it was right back to prohibition. The plant that had helped win the war was once again relegated to the shadows, its true identity buried under decades of propaganda and prejudice. And that’s why today, we’re still using the term “marijuana” – a linguistic relic of one of the most successful disinformation campaigns in American history.

Before we continue with the next bit, I have to mention that during WWII, hemp was legalized again to help beat the Nazis. Films like “Hemp for Victory” were released to have farmers begin cultivating hemp for the war effort. However, once the final barrel cooled down after WWII, they rescinded this special war time request and began tinkering on something far more sinister.

If you ever want to understand how deeply politics can corrupt policy, look no further than the late 1960s and early 1970s. Richard Nixon was facing a perfect storm of political opposition: antiwar protesters questioning his Vietnam policies, the civil rights movement demanding equality, and a counterculture that openly defied traditional authority. For Nixon and his allies, this wasn’t just about politics – it was about control.

But how do you legally suppress political dissent in a democracy? You can’t just arrest people for protesting or being black – at least not openly. But what if you could criminalize their lifestyle? Enter the Controlled Substances Act of 1971, perhaps the most ingenious piece of oppressive legislation ever crafted.

The CSA wasn’t just about making drugs illegal; it was about creating a legal monopoly for pharmaceutical companies while giving law enforcement a weapon to use against “undesirable” populations. The language in the Act literally hands all power over drug manufacturing, research, and distribution to pharmaceutical companies. It’s not even subtle about it – it’s right there in black and white.

To enforce this new corporate drug monopoly, Nixon created the Drug Enforcement Administration. Think of them as the pharmaceutical industry’s private security force, paid for with your tax dollars. Anslinger’s dream of permanent employment in drug enforcement was finally realized, Big Pharma got exclusive rights to the drug trade, and Nixon? Well, he got exactly what he wanted.

As John Ehrlichman, Nixon’s domestic policy chief, later admitted: “We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities.”

But here’s where it gets really dark. Remember the 13th Amendment? The one that abolished slavery? There’s a tiny loophole in there that says slavery is prohibited “except as punishment for a crime.” This wasn’t an oversight – it was a feature. By criminalizing drug use, particularly in targeted communities, the state created a new form of legal slavery.

The results have been staggering. Since 1971, over 20 million Americans have been arrested for drug offenses, many ending up in private prisons where they provide cheap labor for corporations. The United States now imprisons more of its own citizens than any other country in the world. We literally have more people in prison than China, and they have four times our population!

This isn’t just the war on drugs – it’s the continuation of systemic oppression through different means. The CSA turned American citizens into potential slaves, all while ensuring that the real drug dealers – pharmaceutical companies – could operate with impunity. It’s a system so perfectly corrupt, it would make Machiavelli blush.

There you have it, the breakdown why alcohol is now legal and cannabis isn’t. Of course, maybe over the next few years we could see that change as well – Trump energy is chaos and things could swing either way under his rule. We’ll see what happens.

 

ONE MORE REASON WHY ALCOHOL IS LEGAL, READ ON…

HOW CAN ALCOHOL BE LEGAL AND NOT WEED

WHY ALCOHOL IS LEGAL AND CANNABIS WAS MADE ILLEGAL!

 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media