Connect with us

Cannabis News

Teen Vaping Stats – How the CDC is Cooking the Books for Clickbait Headlines

Published

on


cdc vaping data

It will not be too surprising if you haven’t come across any news about the National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) before. For the sake of the foundation, it is an annual survey conducted by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The results of the latest survey have been causing a bit of controversy of late for different reasons. Many are just concerned about the views of the CDC as projected in their youth vaping data and not looking at the results holistically. This is why we are here to help you find the best way to analyze and present the data.

The first standout impact of the NYTS was in 2018 when the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration Scott Gottlieb, responded to it. He stated then that there was an epidemic of youth vaping which sent the entire industry into a frenzy. The pronouncement resorted in youth vaping being at the tip of many people’s lips. Tabloids and headlines jumped on it and many quickly saw youth vaping as a reenactment of the war on drugs and panic spread. As it is with such things, restrictions and bans came along and the public was being swayed.

It was sad to see that when this frenzy was going around about the purported bad influence of youth vaping, many avoided the other side of the story. Nicotine vapes had been the saving grace that made many addicts quit smoking. Very little was being said about this since the FDA stated that it was an epidemic. This aspect of the data was given less airplay and so got swept under the noise of the “epidemic”. It is therefore important that the data from the survey is properly scrutinized and interpreted.

Four years on, the same level of misunderstanding is still being applied to the reports of the NYTS data. This is largely due to the misrepresentation being given by the media, health professionals, lawmakers, and the general public by extension. The release for 2022 will go down as the worst of the lot with inaccuracies being glorified as quality content. This has led to inaccurate reporting from different media outlets on the matter. The worst of it was a report that “more than 1 in 4 teenagers used electronic cigarettes daily”. The actual data for what this outlet was reporting is that 2.5% of youths used cigarettes daily and not 25%.

It is easy to lay the blame solely on the feed of these media outlets for gross incompetency. However, when you pay close attention to how the information is being presented by the CDC, we see a bigger problem in play. The report by the CDC stated that over one in four teenagers who reported using e-cigarettes used them daily. The removal of the clause that this statistic belongs to teens who already use e-cigarettes gives a picture of how the problem occurred.

This mistake of reporting statistics in percentages the wrong way didn’t just start here, instead, it has been a problem for quite some time. While it is common among academics and researchers to use such ratios and percentages, it does not quite appear as the same for average Americans. This means it is best to stay clear of the complicated math and tell it as it is on a flat rate. If that is not done, then there might be a need for us all to do our math of the available info to get a clear picture. These problems can be avoided though if the CDC will simplify the data it puts out to the public.

The only standing reason the CDC has given through its spokesperson for these complications is that prevalence is a ratio and not a rate. This is why its results are being presented as proportions and not necessarily percentages of percentages. Prevalence deals with the proportion of persons with a condition at a time with respect to those who are at risk of that condition as a denominator. While this may the true, the reports of the CDC are still confusing the public. The spokesperson while addressing this stated that the body is always ready to provide clarity and corrections to the public whenever the need arises or inaccuracies are spotted.   

While the CDC has explained its reasons for reporting the way it does, it still does not tick all the inquiry boxes. This view has been echoed by the former director of Action on Smoking and Heath (UK) Clive Bates in his interview with Filter. He was quick to question the way the CDC was defining prevalence as it is the duty of the writer to be as clear as possible to avoid confusion.

He further went on to question if the CDC is focusing its inquiries and objectives towards the right goals. If teenage vaping is to be shown as a societal problem, Bates believes that the emphasis should first be on how many kids are vaping daily. This is the first place to start before we make the jump to start talking about how frequently those who vape do vape. This will help clear the confusion that already exists between the media and the public and help us from taking drastic decisions on inaccurate data.

While it is important that we are clearing the air on some of the mistakes that have come out with the NYTS reports, there is still more to do. It is important that the public pressures the CDC to correct these mistakes and look within to see how they can be avoided. We have stated here already that presenting the data in a clearer and more comprehensible manner will be instrumental in curbing these issues. It is therefore left for the CDC to take to this advice and save us all from being led astray.   

 

CDC ON MARIJUANA RESEARCH, READ ON…

CDC ON MARIJUANA USE

CDC FINDS THAT EVERYONE IS USING CANNABIS, CAN’T FIND ANY PROBLEMS



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cannabis News

What Can Other Countries Learn from First-Mover Canada’s Shrinking Medical Marijuana Industry?

Published

on

By


Canadian medical market shrinking

Since its peak, the regulated medical cannabis industry in Canada has declined a bigger rate than most people thought would happen with recreational legalization. This decline began even before the legalization of recreational marijuana in October 2018 to be precise, and has continued as adult-use sales have replaced controlled medical cannabis purchases.

 

According to experts, the ease of purchasing from adult-use retailers, difficulties for doctors in approving medical cannabis, a lack of tax benefits for medical cannabis consumers and producers, and the fact that THC potency thresholds apply to both medicinal and recreational cannabis products are all contributing factors to the medical market’s decline.

 

Those problems could serve as lessons for other countries and regions that approve medical marijuana first before legalizing it for adult usage.

 

THE SITUATION IN CANADA

 

According to data from Statistics Canada, medical cannabis spending in Canada peaked in the fourth quarter of 2017, at 161 million Canadian dollars, nearly a year before recreational marijuana sales started.

 

The most current statistics indicate that medicinal marijuana sales increased to CA$109 million during the second quarter of 2022 from a low of CA$104 million in the first. According to Brett Zettl, president and CEO of Zyus Life Sciences, a medical marijuana business based in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, which is getting ready to go public through a reverse takeover, patients are currently just giving up and buying stuff from an adult-use store.

 

Canada was the first significant economy in the world to federally legalize recreational marijuana use. But established marijuana markets in the US, like Colorado, have shown a similar tendency, with medical markets contracting after recreational legalization.

 

If Germany implements its proposal to legalize adult use, these tendencies make it uncertain if the country’s largest cannabis market in Europe will experience a similar medicinal market drop.

 

According to Deepak Anand, a top executive of the charitable advocacy group Medical Cannabis Canada and a consultant on cannabis laws for several international governments, some Germans purchase medical marijuana out of their own pockets, and that segment of the market stands to be impacted by the legalization of adult use.

 

Anand said that the public health system reimburses about 40% of all German medicinal marijuana prescriptions.

 

“I don’t think the pattern that we’ve seen in legal markets—where, basically, after recreational legalization, we see medicinal sales have declined—will necessarily continue in Germany,” Anand added.

 

THE INCONVENIENCE FACTOR

 

To obtain dried marijuana, oils, edibles, or topicals through the government’s system, Canadians need a prescription from a doctor or nurse practitioner. This allows people to purchase marijuana straight from licensed dealers for mail delivery.

 

Both growing medical marijuana at home and purchasing it from a certified grower are acceptable.

 

As of the end of 2021, just 42,000 people were producing medical marijuana for personal use or others, according to Health Canada.

 

Comparatively, over 257,000 people registered to purchase cannabis from a commercial grower.

 

Zettl, a veteran participant in Canada’s regulated MMJ market, suggests that several causes could account for the market’s fall since its 2017 peak.  Zettl stated that the Canadian medical cannabis patient group contained both “genuine medicinal users” and some casual users before the legalization of recreational use in October 2018.  They would attempt to obtain it legally while continuing to take it recreationally, according to Zettl.

 

Now, he claimed, purchasing marijuana at an adult-use store is easier than utilizing the legal medical marijuana system.

 

Zettl also thinks that doctors might be reluctant to waste hours filling out medical marijuana permission paperwork and that medical-certification agencies may audit doctors who approve cannabis for an excessive number of patients.

 

People simply don’t want the inconvenience element, according to Zettl. The hassle aspect is not desired by the doctors.

 

Following the legalization of cannabis for adult use, new cannabis products, such as edibles, entered the market. However, medical cannabis products are still subject to the same laws as recreational cannabis, including THC limitations on goods like edibles.

 

Anand said that it would be incorrect to hold recreational and medical marijuana to equal standards, concerning imposing limitations for high THC, for example.

 

He contends that due to Canada’s preoccupation with legalizing marijuana for recreational use, not just have patients been overlooked, but also regulating policy has been disregarded to a significant degree.”

 

The patient is going to the illegal market to be able to acquire their products, as we observed and are still experiencing, he continued.

 

Another historical obstacle for the medical market was the cost of cannabis, according to Anand.  That has improved since recreational use was legalized.

 

Although it does allow registered patients to deduct medical marijuana costs on their yearly tax returns, Canada does not provide registered medical cannabis users with any special tax treatment.

 

Patients who purchase medical marijuana pay retail taxes, just like they would at a store selling recreational goods, and growers pay the same excise taxes as those on cannabis for adult use.

 

Anand stated that it simply doesn’t make sense since, in Canada, there is no tax on any other medicinal products.

 

GAINING GROUND ONCE MORE

 

To get Canada’s medical marijuana business thriving once more, Anand advocated for legislative changes.

 

It should be done right away, he argued, to permit pharmacists to administer medical cannabis.  We should also immediately remove taxes and potency restrictions.

 

The Canadian cannabis sector is hoping for changes to the federal Cannabis Act, which is presently being reviewed.

 

One of the key subjects for the review, according to the government, is the effect of regulation and legalization of cannabis on accessibility to marijuana for medical purposes.

 

According to Zyus’ Zettl, the government is utilizing “this recreational-style statute to control and regulate the medical side – and it’s coming at a great disservice for the medicinal usage, on both the doctors’ side and the patient side.

 

Zettl stated that Zyus is creating three cannabis drug-product candidates to expand the country’s medicinal marijuana industry and anticipates eventually obtaining official Drug Identification Numbers (DINs) from Health Canada.

 

Because they could be included in insurance companies’ formularies for prescription drugs and doctors could recommend them without worrying about being scrutinized by regulators.

 

Zettl acknowledged the long-term nature of obtaining DINs for herbal cannabis products.

 

Therefore, medical marijuana must, in the interim, find methods to appeal to those who are really, honestly utilizing it for medical purposes and offer them a reason to continue using it rather than giving up and only purchasing it (from recreational businesses).

 

BOTTOM LINE

Other countries looking to make recreational cannabis legal at the federal level can take a look at what the move did to the Canadian cannabis market and work on policies and regulations that will be better for the country before legalization takes place.

 

COUNTRIES LEGALIZING WEED, READ ON…

COUNTRIES LEGALIZING MARIJUANA

COUNTRIES LEGALIZING CANNABIS BEFORE THE USA? CLICK HERE!



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Religious Dogma is Anti-Cannabis Legalization?

Published

on

By


religious marijuana myths

Reginald bong-rips religious dogma to shreds…

 

It’s been a while since I’ve put on my “thinking gloves” and had a few rounds with some random internet “opinion”. You see, I don’t mind it if people tear into my arguments. I’ve had some hate in the past due to the things I write, but for the most part I staple together a pretty coherent thought.

 

At least I have some highly entertaining lines that people seem to enjoy.

 

Therefore, I believe that if anyone feels like “ripping me a new one” on anything I have written in the past – more power to them! I think opinions or ideas are supposed to be discussed, disintegrated, challenged, and strengthened in the art of mental combat.

 

This is why I dedicate some of my writing energy to writing responses to assumptions, accusations, and outright lies by people who wish to enforce a state of prohibition.

 

To be fair, I don’t care if you smoke or don’t – my main principle is that you are an autonomous being that should have autonomous decision making about what you can and cannot consume. No state should have the power to tell you, “Don’t eat that!” or “Don’t drink that!”

 

If I truly am free, I should be able to drink a bottle of rattlesnake poison if I choose to do so…however, for a long time in places like the US “suicide was a crime”. This is no longer the case federally, but many places still list “attempted suicide” as a criminal offense within their statutes.

 

A crime against who?

 

This is the big question…who owns the individual?

 

Well – that depends on who you ask and that is the perfect opening to introduce our “virtual contender” for today’s bout.

Father Dogma

Stoners and Stonettes – I present to you – “The Dogma Father” who argues that the state enforce God’s law (but not directly) and thinks that cannabis legalization is “bad mmm-kay”.

 

I don’t really know this dude’s real name – and in all likeliness he’s probably not a bad guy if you get to know him in real life.

 

However, the opinion that is dwelling inside his grey head is a treacherous beast that needs to be slayed. It’s rooted in a “satanic principle” which I’ll explain later on, and that goes in direct contrast to his true beliefs. In fact, I wrote about that at length here. Today however, I’ll apply the same ideals in contrast to his dogmatic and highly religious beliefs.

 

So let’s get ready!

 

ROUND 1: Marijuana is a Dangerous Drug!

 

DOGMA FATHER TAKES FIRST SWING:

 

Despite such broad acceptance, marijuana remains a dangerous drug that undermines both good civic order and public health. It decreases the ability to control emotions, leading to improper and anti-social behavior. It’s a recognized cause of crime and violence, as well as auto accidents and other mishaps.

It’s also profoundly self-destructive. Marijuana users commit suicide at three times the rate of the general population. And marijuana is commonly acknowledged as a “gateway drug,” leading to the use of other, more potent and addictive substances. Research suggests it even increases alcohol consumption.

SOURCE: NewsPress

REGINALD RESPONDS:

 

HOLY SHIT DID WE TRAVEL IN TIME? All we’re missing now is “it makes darkies think they’re as good as white people” as was attributed to Harry J. Anslinger.

 

There is absolutely no evidence to support any of the claims being spouted by Dogma Father. In fact, every place that has legalized has seen a general decrease in crime as suggested by THIS STUDY. Secondly, there is no evidence that it “decreases the ability to control emotions”.

 

I’ve been smoking cannabis for twenty-years and despite certain moments of my life when under extreme pressure – I’m as Zen as they get. Now some might argue that it’s “anecdotal evidence” which is true, however, his statement is a blanket statement that assumes that “everyone can’t control their emotions under the influence of cannabis” and the mere existence of myself destroys that claim.

 

While I haven’t seen the alleged study claiming that cannabis increases the likeliness of suicide…which I doubt highly…we can play the devil’s advocate with this one.

 

Let’s say that it’s true that people who commit suicide also smoke cannabis. However, could the cannabis not merely be a coping mechanism for the crippling depression they are carrying? Could it not be them trying to numb the pain and cannabis is an available substance?

 

Perhaps it’s not that cannabis leads to more suicide…perhaps it’s suicidal people who use cannabis to escape their thoughts. I know a few people who had suicidal tendencies and have helped them cope with these thoughts – it’s never the substance causing the thoughts…it’s usually some internal underlying trauma hidden from the conscious mind.

 

If anything, you can use cannabis to heal these broken parts – but once more, anecdotal!

 

 

DOGMA FATHER TAKES ANOTHER SWING

 

 A proposal to legalize pot shops is expected to come before the Collier County Board of Commissioners early next year. This is unfortunate, because even the public debate of legal sales will draw added attention to the drug, making it a common topic of conversation. This will reinforce the false impression that open availability is a legitimate public policy option.

If the measure should pass, the aggressive advertising that will inevitably follow can only amplify the message that marijuana is just fine.

It is not fine.

 

REGINALD DODGES AND JABS

 

God forbid anyone actually talk about the problems or issues in their lives. It’s far more polite to burry your problems deep in your unconscious, put on a fake smile and pretend everything is honky-dory.

 

What’s unfortunate is not that people will make cannabis a common topic of conversation, but rather that the blatant refusal of acknowledgement that “some people smoke cannabis”. The “leper strategy” – in where you ostracize or downplay a group of people who contradict your narrative doesn’t work.

 

You called us stoners and we took your word and made it ours, built a culture around it, and influenced the masses.

 

The false impression is that prohibition works. But all prohibition does is criminalizes your ability to choose what you can and cannot consume, gives unchecked powers to the government, and basically enslaves the world.

 

DOGMA  FATHER’S FINAL ATTACK!

 

Legalization is an extremely unwise policy. We must insist that our county commissioners approach this proposal with the utmost caution.

They have only to look at the consequences of unrestricted marijuana sales in cities like San Francisco, Denver, and others that have gone the legalization route. Increased crime, increased traffic hazard, increased illness, increased homelessness and panhandling — these and other deteriorated civic conditions are all too evident.

Marijuana is both a threat and a hazard. We don’t want the quality of life in Collier County going to pot.

 

REGINALD BOBS AND WEAVES

 

All of these “consequences” aren’t backed. They are merely perceptions from an indoctrinated religious scholar who believes that “the way things were” is the right way. Sorry to say, but no – all of that was based on lies, power grabs, and actually made drugs more dangerous.

 

Your entire philosophy is actually kind of satanic if you think about it.

 

 

REGINALD COMES WITH A QUICK ONE TWO

 

The other day I was thinking about the Garden of Eden (and the type of weed they might have had)….jk

 

I was thinking about the concept of creation and under the Christian myth, God is the creator of all. This includes cannabis. God made it for human consumption – He said so in the bible.

 

All of the warnings about lewd behavior in the bible almost always relates to drunkenness. The times that the Bible does mention weed, it’s as an ingredient in the Holy Anointing oils.

 

Therefore, to deny people access to cannabis is literally saying “God fucked up!” He didn’t mean cannabis!

 

I also specially remember parts of the Bible talking about “adding words to God’s word” and how that’s a big “no” within the whole God Almighty ethos.

 

But let’s say that you want to apply the reasoning of the “drunkenness” to cannabis, seeing that it “gets you high”. Of course, cannabis doesn’t get you “high” in the same way that alcohol gets you “drunk”. The effects are completely different.

 

Nonetheless, for the sake of argument – if God “warned” you about weed – he didn’t enforce his warning. Let me put it this way, you have “Free Will” under the ethos of God, meaning you have the freedom to sin.

 

However, for some reason, Father Dogma believes that God’s got it wrong again. You can’t just “allow people to be”, you must “enforce your law”.

 

Except, God doesn’t enforce his laws. If you get shit faced drunk or fuck your neighbor’s wife – you won’t drop dead because you broke God’s law.

 

Perhaps you “risk” the chance of eternal damnation in the fiery pits of hell, but while you’re living you’re allowed to sin as much as your wretched heart desires.

 

My question is; “If God doesn’t enforce his celestial laws on humans…if Christ didn’t intervene in earthly affairs – why is the Dogma Father sucking so hard on gubernatorial cock?”

 

I think the answer lies in the function of “organized religion” within the fabric of society. It’s not a coincidence that the Dogma Father spewed out similar points as Anslinger…they are cut from the same cloth.

 

There’s a song that has a line in it that says,

 

“The government wants to own your skin, religion your soul within, but all they seek is gold to put you under their control…”

SOURCE: (SONG)

 

And this is exactly correct. The truth of the matter is that these commands do not come from a “loving god” but rather the authoritarian hooks of Satan (according to their mythos).

 

Think about it, God says, “Live by these rules and life is awesome” but then doesn’t enforce the rules, they are more like guidelines.

 

However, within the Bible, Satan is painted as someone who wants to “bind and deceive you”, to “control your will”.

 

Then how is enforcing prohibition a thing of “God”? Sounds more like the devil’s work to me…

 

DOGMA FATHER GOES DOWN FOR THE COUNT…IT’S OVER!!!

 

THE BIBLE ON WEED, READ ON…

BIBLE ON MARIJUANA

WHAT DOES THE HOLY BIBLE SAY ABOUT MARIJUANA, READ THIS!



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Don’t Miss! New York Retail Dispensary Guidelines: What Every CAURD Applicant Needs to Know

Published

on

By


Register Here

Date: December 7th, 2022

Time: 2 – 3pm EST


New York recently released its adult-use cannabis retail dispensary guidelines and there is a lot to unpack. We will likely see additional changes to New York’s rules and regulations, but the released guidelines provide a robust initial framework for applicants (past and future) to follow.

Join Harris Bricken’s lead New York cannabis attorneys, Simon Malinowski and Matthew Schwartz as they analyze the recently released regulations.

Simon and Matt will cover operating requirements, employee training, and marketing rules, among many other topics covered in New York’s retail dispensary guidelines.


Check out some of our past Canna Law Blog posts on New York’s cannabis regulation updates:

  1. BREAKING: NY Federal Judge Blocks CAURD Licensing in Five Regions
  2. New York’s Cannabis Retail Dispensary Regulations Are Here!
  3. New York’s Cannabis Retail Dispensary Regulations, Part 1: Dispensary Operations



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media