Connect with us

Cannabis News

The US is Waging a Silent War on Cannabis Moms

Published

on


moms who use cannabis are under attack

The US’ silent war on Cannabis Mothers

The War on Drugs, that grand American experiment in prohibition and punishment, has left a trail of destruction in its wake that’s hard to fathom. For over half a century, this misguided crusade has torn families apart, filled prisons to bursting, and shattered countless lives. The numbers are staggering – millions incarcerated, families left in financial ruin, and communities decimated. And for what? A war that has failed to stem the tide of drug use or addiction, instead criminalizing health issues and personal choices.

But the casualties of this war aren’t spread evenly across society. Oh no, that would be too fair. Instead, it’s minority communities and the poor who’ve borne the brunt of this assault on personal freedom. The scales of justice, it seems, are tipped heavily against those with the wrong skin color or too little cash in their pockets.

Yet amidst all this well-documented carnage, there’s a silent battle being waged that few are talking about. It’s a war on mothers, fought through the insidious weaponization of Child Protective Services. Even in states where cannabis has been legalized, moms are finding themselves in the crosshairs, their children torn from their arms over a joint or an edible.

It’s a twisted irony – in a country where wine mom culture is celebrated and kids are medicated for ADHD at the drop of a hat, a mom who uses cannabis to unwind or manage chronic pain can lose everything. The same system that’s supposed to protect children is being used to traumatize them, all in the name of a plant that’s less harmful than alcohol.

In this article, we’re going to peel back the curtain on this hidden front of the War on Drugs. We’ll explore how overzealous policies and outdated stigmas are destroying families and harming the very children they claim to protect. It’s time to shine a light on this cruel and unnecessary aspect of cannabis prohibition – a reminder that even as legalization spreads, the tentacles of the War on Drugs continue to squeeze the life out of American families.

I recently dove into a deeply disturbing Rolling Stone article that shed light on a hidden front of the War on Drugs – the targeting of cannabis-using mothers. It’s a long, gut-wrenching piece, but I’ll try to distill some of the key points here. Fair warning, folks – this isn’t a feel-good story.

Let’s start with Doshia Givens, a single mom in Cleveland. After a horrific car accident left her in crippling pain, she opted for cannabis instead of addictive opioids to manage her suffering. Sounds reasonable, right? Well, Child Protective Services didn’t think so. When her daughter Selah tested positive for THC after a routine hospital visit, Doshia was deemed an “imminent risk” to her child. Within 24 hours, they were torn apart. All because a mother chose a safer pain management option in a state drowning in opioid deaths.

Then there’s Raneisha Hubbert in Los Angeles. Her crime? Testing positive for marijuana after her mischievous toddler kept escaping their new apartment. Despite no evidence of neglect or harm to her children, both kids were taken away. The system labeled her a “substance abuser” unfit to care for her own flesh and blood.

But surely this doesn’t happen in states where weed is legal, right? Wrong. Take Lindsay Ridgell from Arizona, where medical marijuana has been legal since 2010. She used cannabis during pregnancy to combat severe morning sickness, with her doctor’s blessing. Yet when her son was born, he was drug tested without her consent, and she found herself under investigation for neglect. This, despite Arizona’s laws specifically protecting medical marijuana users from such discrimination.

These aren’t isolated incidents. The article reveals that tens of thousands of mothers across the country are coming under scrutiny for cannabis use. Many lose custody entirely, labeled as dangers to their own children. They’re forced into drug treatment programs and subjected to humiliating surveillance, all for using a substance that’s legal in many states and less harmful than alcohol.

Which begs the question – how is this good for the children? Where’s the harm in a parent using cannabis responsibly, especially compared to the known dangers of separation trauma? We don’t see this kind of heavy-handed intervention when parents drink alcohol, or feed their kids a steady diet of processed junk food and sugar. Hell, we celebrate “wine mom” culture while demonizing cannabis-using mothers.

The hypocrisy is staggering. These policies aren’t protecting kids; they’re traumatizing them. Ripping a child from a loving home over a parent’s cannabis use isn’t child protection – it’s state-sanctioned child abuse. And it’s happening right under our noses, even as we pat ourselves on the back for progressing beyond the worst excesses of the War on Drugs.

It’s high time we faced this ugly truth: our child welfare system is being weaponized to continue the War on Drugs by other means. And it’s our kids who are paying the price.

 

 

Let’s cut through the bullshit and call this what it is: state-sanctioned child abuse masquerading as protection. The system labels cannabis-using mothers as “substance abusers” and “dangers” to their children. Their solution? Rip kids from their homes and toss them into a foster care system that’s about as nurturing as a cactus in winter.

Now, I’m not advocating for parents to blaze up 24/7 while neglecting their rugrats. But let’s get real about the trauma we’re inflicting on these kids in the name of “protecting” them. Being separated from your parents, especially during those crucial formative years, isn’t just a bummer – it’s potentially life-altering in the worst way possible.

The stats on kids who grow up without their parents or in foster care are downright depressing. Higher rates of mental health issues, substance abuse problems, and incarceration. Lower educational attainment and income levels. Increased risk of homelessness and early pregnancy. It’s a laundry list of societal ills that we’re essentially programming into these kids’ futures.

So, what’s worse? A mom who unwinds with a joint after the kids are in bed, or subjecting a child to a system that dramatically increases their chances of ending up depressed, addicted, or in prison?

Let’s flip the script for a second. Is a cannabis mom really such a horror show? We’re talking about people who love, nurture, and care for their kids. They clean scraped knees, cook meals, help with homework, and provide the emotional security that’s crucial for healthy development. Does the fact that they use cannabis suddenly negate all of that? Does it make them unfit for motherhood?

Hell no. In fact, recent research suggests that cannabis-using parents might actually be more engaged with their kids. They’re more likely to get down on the floor and play, to immerse themselves in their children’s worlds. That kind of interaction is gold for a developing brain.

But the law, in its infinite, scientifically illiterate wisdom, doesn’t see any of this nuance. It sees “drug user” and immediately equates that with “unfit parent.” Never mind the trauma inflicted on the child. Never mind the loving home destroyed. The War on Drugs demands its pound of flesh, and it’s our kids who are paying the price.

Is this really the society we want to live in? One where the state can snatch your children because you chose to consume a plant that’s less harmful than alcohol? Where families are torn apart not because of abuse or neglect, but because of outdated, hysterical drug policies?

We need to ask ourselves: Is the cost of this aspect of the War on Drugs higher than any perceived harm from cannabis use? Are we okay with traumatizing children to punish parents for a victimless crime? Because make no mistake, that’s exactly what we’re doing.

It’s time to wake up and smell the cannabis, folks. This isn’t about protecting kids. It’s about perpetuating a failed war that’s destroying lives and families. We need to demand better. We need policies based on science and compassion, not fear and stigma. Because right now, we’re not protecting children – we’re sacrificing them on the altar of prohibition. And that’s a cost that’s far too high to bear.

Alright, folks, it’s time to cut through the haze and face some hard truths. The War on Drugs has been ravaging our society for over half a century now. Isn’t it about damn time we admit this experiment in prohibition has failed spectacularly? We’re supposed to be living in an age of big data and evidence-based policy, yet here we are, still clinging to these draconian, uninformed drug laws like they’re some kind of security blanket.

Let’s talk hypocrisy for a second. We’ve got politicians and policymakers waxing poetic about protecting the children, using them as rhetorical shields in their crusade against drugs. But when it comes down to it, they’re more than happy to rip kids away from loving homes over a parent’s cannabis use. Tell me, how exactly is traumatizing a child by separating them from their family protecting them? It’s like trying to fireproof a house by burning it to the ground.

I don’t know about you, but I think it’s high time (pun fully intended) that we renegotiate our relationship with drugs from a policy perspective. We’re not the same society we were back in 1971 when Nixon kicked off this ill-fated war. We’ve evolved, we’ve learned, and we’ve seen firsthand the catastrophic consequences of treating a public health issue like a criminal one.

Using the full force of the law, including the child welfare system, to crack down on cannabis use is like using a sledgehammer to hang a picture frame. It’s excessive, it’s destructive, and it completely misses the point. We need policies that actually help families, not tear them apart. Policies based on science and compassion, not outdated moral panics and political posturing.

So here’s the sticky bottom line: It’s time to end this senseless war. It’s time to stop punishing parents for using a substance that’s legal in many states and less harmful than alcohol. It’s time to prioritize the real well-being of children over some misguided notion of drug-free purity.

Because let’s face it, the real danger to these kids isn’t a parent who uses cannabis responsibly. It’s a system that’s willing to traumatize them in the name of a failed ideology. And that’s a habit we need to kick, once and for all.

 

SOCCER MOMS AND WEED, READ ON…

CONFESSION OF A STONED SOCCER MOM

CONFESSIONS OF A STONED SUBURBAN SOCCER MOM!



Source link

Cannabis News

The Future King of Cannabis will be THC-Infused Beverages

Published

on

By


cannabis beverages are the future

As someone who’s been dancing with Mary Jane for over two decades, I’ve watched the cannabis industry evolve from simple flower into an endless array of innovative products. I’ve tried just about every form of cannabis imaginable – from traditional joints to high-tech dabs, from basic brownies to sophisticated gummies, and everything in between.

For most old-school stoners like myself, smoking flower still reigns supreme. Sure, concentrates have carved out their niche, and edibles have certainly found their place in the cannabis kingdom. But there’s one product category that remains tantalizingly out of reach, one holy grail that could revolutionize not just cannabis consumption, but potentially reshape the entire recreational substance industry.

I’m talking about cannabis beverages. Now, before you rush to tell me they already exist – trust me, I know. But what’s currently on the market isn’t even close to what it needs to be. The first company to crack this code – to create the perfect cannabis drink that rivals the ease and social experience of cracking open a beer – stands to make billions.

This isn’t just speculation. Recent market research suggests we’re on the cusp of a beverage revolution, and cannabis is perfectly positioned to lead the charge. Let’s explore why the future king of cannabis isn’t a product that you smoke, dab, or eat – it’s one you’ll drink.

The numbers don’t lie, and they’re telling us something extraordinary. According to a recent study published in the British Food Journal, roughly 53-56% of beer drinkers are open to trying cannabis-infused beverages. Let that sink in for a moment. We’re not talking about a small niche market here – we’re talking about potentially converting half of the beer-drinking population into cannabis beverage consumers.

To put this in perspective, the U.S. beer market generates approximately $100 billion annually. If even a quarter of those open to trying cannabis beverages became regular consumers, we’re looking at a potential market worth tens of billions of dollars. This isn’t just a business opportunity; it’s an industry-defining moment waiting to happen.

But here’s the catch – and it’s a big one. When someone cracks open a beer, they generally know what to expect. Whether it’s a light beer at 4% alcohol or a craft brew at 7%, drinkers understand their limits. Through years of social drinking, people have learned their “sweet spot” – maybe it’s two beers for a pleasant buzz, or three for a livelier evening. The standardization of alcohol content has created a predictable, manageable drinking experience.

Cannabis beverages, however, are still stuck in the Wild West phase. Sure, you might see “10mg THC” printed on the can, but that same dose can floor one person while barely affecting another. The inconsistency isn’t just about individual tolerance – it’s about the fundamental challenge of creating a standardized cannabis drinking experience. Absorption rates vary wildly, onset times are unpredictable, and the overall effects can be all over the map.

This inconsistency is the Achilles’ heel of the current cannabis beverage market. Until someone figures out how to create a product that delivers a consistent, predictable experience – something as reliable as cracking open a Bud Light or a Corona – cannabis beverages will remain a novelty rather than the industry titan they could become.

Major players have already dipped their toes into the cannabis beverage pool. Companies like Pabst Blue Ribbon have launched cannabis-infused seltzers, while Lagunitas offers their Hi-Fi Hops drinks. Even beverage giant Constellation Brands (the folks behind Corona) invested billions in Canopy Growth, signaling big alcohol’s serious interest in the space. Yet, despite these heavy hitters throwing their hats in the ring, we still haven’t seen the breakthrough product that could truly revolutionize the market.

The fundamental challenge lies in creating a standardized drinking experience. Currently, most cannabis beverages rely on traditional THC infusion methods, which leads to unpredictable absorption rates and that dreaded “wait and see” game that’s familiar to anyone who’s eaten an edible. Some companies are experimenting with nano-emulsification technology to make THC molecules more water-soluble, potentially leading to faster onset times and more consistent effects. But we’re not quite there yet.

Here’s where things get really tricky: when cannabis is processed through the liver (as it is with traditional edibles and current beverages), it gets converted into 11-Hydroxy-THC, which packs roughly four times the punch of regular THC. This is why you might feel fine after one cannabis beverage, then suddenly find yourself on Mars after the second one kicks in. Unlike alcohol, where you can generally gauge your level of intoxication as you drink, cannabis beverages can stack up in unexpected ways, leading to the dreaded “green out.”

What the industry needs is some sort of revolutionary chemistry – perhaps a form of THC that bypasses liver processing, or a formulation that caps the conversion to 11-Hydroxy-THC. Maybe it’s about developing a cannabis beverage that provides a short-lived buzz, similar to alcohol’s relatively predictable duration. Or perhaps it’s about creating a self-limiting effect that prevents overconsumption.

The solutions might seem elusive, but the potential reward is staggering. The first company to crack this code – to create a cannabis beverage that allows people to drink socially without fear of unexpected intensity or duration – will essentially be sitting on a gold mine. We’re talking about potentially billions in revenue, not to mention the distinction of creating an entirely new category of social consumption.

The challenge is complex, but the market is ready. With over half of beer drinkers expressing interest in cannabis beverages, the demand is clearly there. Now it’s just a matter of who will solve the chemistry puzzle first. As someone who’s watched this industry evolve for decades, I can tell you – that breakthrough is coming. And when it does, it will fundamentally change not just how we consume cannabis, but potentially how we socialize altogether.

 

THC-INFUSED BEVERAGES ARE HERE, READ ON…

THC BEVERAGES AT BARS

SORRY, NO BOOZE SERVED – MIAMI FESTIVAL ONLY SERVES THC DRINKS!



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

What You Need to Know about the Viral Medical Study Claiming Cannabis Causes Memory Loss

Published

on

By


viral cannabis study

What You Should Really Know About The Viral Study Claiming Cannabis Causes Memory Loss

 

Over the past week, we’ve been seeing the same viral news appear on almost every internet news or media outlet.


It’s news surrounding the results of a controversial study, claiming that cannabis use can cause memory loss, especially when consumption patterns are on the heavy side. Researchers from the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus conducted what is considered to be the biggest study of its kind, specifically analyzing the impact of both lifetime and recent cannabis use on the cognitive function of over 1,000 individuals whose ages ranged from 22 to 36.

 

For the purposes of the study, heavy users were defined as the young adults who consumed weed over a thousand times in their lifetime. On the other hand, moderate users were defined as those who used 10 to 999 times, whole nonusers were those who consumed nonusers. They used MRI tests to assess neural activity among participants, and they were all given a variety of cognitive tasks to complete; the tasks tested different functions in the brain including memory, motor skills, language, emotion, and reward.

Additionally, the investigators used brain imaging technology to measure working memory, which refers to the brain’s short-term storage of information. Humans use working memory in everyday problem solving, reasoning, and other activities.

 

They found that there was a statistically significant impact on the working memory tasks given to participants, which meant that it was not likely due to coincidence. The dramatic impact was observed among the lifetime and recent cannabis consumers, though it was less significant when compared to other tasks.

 

“We applied the highest standards to our research, setting rigorous thresholds for statistical significance across all seven cognitive function tests. To minimize the risk of false positives, we employed false discovery rate (FDR) correction. While some of the other tasks indicated potential cognitive impairment, only the working memory task showed a statistically significant impact,” explains Joshua Gowin, PhD, the paper’s first author and an assistant professor of radiology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine and the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus.  Specifically, the researchers discovered that the parts of the brain that are responsible for decision making, emotional processing, attention, and memory showed reduced activity among heavy cannabis users.


The Role of Abstaining

 

While this might come as a shock, it’s important to note that Gowin explains their findings suggest users can abstain from smoking cannabis before engaging in cognitive tasks, since this can help performance.


“People need to be aware of their relationship with cannabis since abstaining cold turkey could disrupt their cognition as well. For example, heavy users may need to be more cautious,” Gowin explains.

 

The effects of abstaining can depend on several factors, such as an individual’s history of cannabis use, the task at hand, and various biochemical individual differences. Adding to what Gowin said, there are certainly several potential benefits that users can expect when abstaining from weed, especially when they expect to do a mentally-burdensome task. These include an improvement in cognitive function, better concentration and focus, and sharper clarity as well as alertness.

 

But Can Cannabis Actually Improve Cognitive Function?

 

Studies have proven time and again that cannabis affects everyone differently. So while weed use can make some people sharper and more focused with cognitive tasks, it may not have the same effect for others – or even the majority of a population, as seen in this study.

 

There are also other studies proving that cannabis actually improves cognitive function in others, or doesn’t affect it at all. For example, Dr Staci Gruber’s Marijuana Investigations for Neuroscientific Discovery (MIND) program of the McLean Hospital discovered through longitudinal observational studies that medical marijuana patients showed improved performances in cognitive tasks that required them to use executive functioning.

“Rather than getting worse, they’re actually getting better,” explained Gruber. Gruber and her team are focused on analyzing the impact of cannabis and its impact on cognition, function, quality of life, and brain structure. According to her, this can be attributed to patients who can think more clearly since since their symptoms have been alleviated due to medical marijuana use. However, earlier cannabis use, or regular consumption before the age of 16, is still never recommended because this has been found to severely affect cognitive development and performance later on.

 

Another study, whose findings were presented at the 2018 annual Society for Neuroscience Meeting, found that animal subjects with Alzheimer’s disease, who were treated with THC, showed significant improvemnets in memory and even lost less brain cells compared to those that weren’t. This could be revolutionary if a breakthrough memory or Alzheimer’s medicine could be developed, which included THC.

 

 

Conclusion


In short, the viral study claiming that marijuana can affect your memory should be taken with a grain of salt. It’s just one of many studies backing up the fact that weed will always affect people differently, given that there are already several other studies backing up the use of cannabis to improve cognition – even among medical marijuana users who suffer from physical ailments.

 

Cannabis certainly does offer neuroprotective benefits for the brain, and it can aid with other cognitive functions including creativity, sleep, reduction in anxiety, and much more. We must still remember that even with studies proving this, cannabis use during adolescence should be prohibited and keep in mind that individual variability will always play a role in the outcome. 

 

MARIJUANA USE AND MEMORY FUNCTION, READ ON…

MARIJUANA AND BABY BOOMERS FOR MEMORY

WHY ARE BABY BOOMERS RUSHING TO CANNABIS TO IMPROVE THEIR MEMORY?



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Chairman of High Times Pleads Guilty to $20 Million in Securities Fraud, Then Decides to Change His Guilty Plea?

Published

on

By


plea agreement on adam levin

In a significant development within the cannabis industry, Adam Levin, the chairman of Hightimes Holding Corp., has agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy charges related to a scheme involving undisclosed payments made to an investment analyst. Or is he? Adam plans to change his guilty plea in a new court proceeding that is coming up. So what gives?

Th original scheme aimed to promote Hightimes’ securities offering, raising serious questions about transparency and ethical practices in the burgeoning cannabis market. As the industry continues to navigate regulatory challenges and public scrutiny, this case highlights the complexities and potential pitfalls that companies face as they seek to capitalize on the growing acceptance of cannabis.

 

Background on Hightimes Holding Corp.

 

Hightimes Holding Corp., the parent company of the iconic cannabis culture brand High Times, has been a prominent player in the cannabis industry since its inception. Founded in 1974, High Times has long been associated with cannabis advocacy, culture, and education. Over the years, it has evolved into a multimedia company encompassing print publications, events, and digital platforms focused on cannabis.

 

In recent years, as legalization efforts gained momentum across various states in the U.S., Hightimes sought to capitalize on this trend by transitioning into a publicly traded entity. In 2020, the company announced its intention to go public through a reverse merger with a publicly traded shell company. This move was seen as a way for Hightimes to access capital markets and fund its expansion initiatives.

 

However, the journey has not been without its challenges. The company has faced various legal and financial hurdles, including allegations of fraud and operational mismanagement that ultimately led to its receivership in 2024. These issues have raised concerns among investors regarding the company’s governance and financial practices.

 

The Scheme Uncovered

 

The recent developments surrounding Adam Levin center on allegations that he participated in a scheme to make undisclosed payments to an investment analyst who promoted Hightimes’ securities offering. According to court documents filed on December 20, 2024, Levin agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy charges related to this arrangement.

 

The scheme reportedly involved over $150,000 in payments made to the analyst as part of an effort to artificially inflate investor interest in Hightimes’ stock. By compensating the analyst for favorable coverage without disclosing these payments, Levin and others involved sought to create a misleading impression of demand for the company’s securities. This lack of transparency is particularly concerning given the regulatory environment surrounding securities offerings, which mandates full disclosure of any compensation arrangements that could influence an analyst’s recommendations.

 

The Investigation into this scheme was initiated by both the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), highlighting a broader scrutiny of practices within the cannabis industry. As more companies enter this rapidly evolving market, regulators are increasingly vigilant about ensuring compliance with securities laws and protecting investors from potential fraud.

 

## Legal Consequences

 

As part of his plea agreement, Adam Levin is set to appear in court on January 17, 2025. He faces a potential maximum sentence of five years in federal prison for his role in the conspiracy. The plea agreement indicates that Levin is cooperating with authorities as they continue their investigation into Hightimes and its business practices.

 

The legal ramifications extend beyond Levin himself; they also raise questions about corporate governance within Hightimes Holding Corp. The company’s board of directors will likely face increased scrutiny regarding their oversight responsibilities and whether they adequately monitored Levin’s actions.

 

In addition to potential criminal charges for individuals involved in such schemes, companies can also face civil penalties from regulatory agencies like the SEC. These penalties can include fines, disgorgement of profits obtained through fraudulent activities, and restrictions on future business operations.

 

 Implications for Hightimes Holding Corp.

 

The fallout from Levin’s plea agreement is likely to have significant implications for Hightimes Holding Corp. The company has already been grappling with various challenges related to its financial stability and reputation within the industry. The revelation of this scheme adds another layer of complexity to an already precarious situation.

 

 1. Investor Confidence

 

One immediate concern is how this development will affect investor confidence in Hightimes Holding Corp. Investors are increasingly cautious about putting their money into companies embroiled in legal controversies or allegations of fraud. Given that Hightimes has already faced scrutiny over its business practices, this latest revelation could deter potential investors from participating in future funding rounds or purchasing shares.

 

 2. Regulatory Scrutiny

 

The ongoing investigation by federal authorities is likely to result in heightened regulatory scrutiny for Hightimes Holding Corp. Companies operating within the cannabis space must navigate a complex web of federal and state regulations; any indication of wrongdoing can lead regulators to take a closer look at a company’s operations. This increased scrutiny may result in further investigations or audits that could disrupt business operations and hinder growth prospects.

 

3. Reputation Damage

 

Hightimes has built its brand around cannabis culture and advocacy; however, allegations of unethical practices can tarnish its reputation among consumers and advocates alike. As public perception plays a crucial role in the success of cannabis companies, any damage done to Hightimes’ reputation could have long-lasting effects on its market position and ability to attract customers.

 

 4. Operational Challenges

 

With Levin’s impending court appearance and potential sentencing looming over the company, operational challenges may arise as key leadership figures are embroiled in legal battles. Uncertainty regarding leadership stability can create internal disruptions that hinder decision-making processes essential for navigating an evolving market landscape.

 

Cannabis Industry Challenges

 

Levin’s case is not an isolated incident but rather part of broader challenges facing the cannabis industry as it matures. As more states legalize cannabis for medical or recreational use—leading some companies toward lucrative opportunities—regulatory compliance becomes increasingly critical.

 

 1. Regulatory Landscape

 

The regulatory landscape surrounding cannabis remains complex due largely to its classification as a Schedule I substance under federal law despite legalization efforts at state levels. Companies must navigate differing regulations across jurisdictions while ensuring compliance with federal securities laws when seeking investments or going public.

 

 2. Market Competition

 

As competition intensifies within the cannabis sector—both from established players like Hightimes and new entrants—companies face pressure not only regarding compliance but also profitability metrics that appeal directly toward investors seeking returns on their investments.

 

 3. Public Perception

 

Public perception plays an essential role in shaping consumer behavior within emerging markets like cannabis; negative headlines can quickly sway opinions against brands perceived as engaging in unethical practices or lacking transparency—further complicating efforts toward building trust among consumers who prioritize ethical sourcing methods when choosing products they consume.

 

Conclusion

 

The case involving Adam Levin, chairman of Hightimes Holding Corp., underscores critical issues of transparency and ethical conduct within the cannabis industry, highlighting the potential legal and reputational repercussions that can arise from undisclosed financial arrangements. As Levin prepares to plead guilty to conspiracy charges related to undisclosed payments aimed at promoting the company’s securities offering, this incident serves as a cautionary tale for cannabis companies navigating the complexities of regulatory compliance and investor relations. The fallout from this case not only threatens Hightimes’ financial stability and investor confidence but also reflects broader challenges facing the industry as it matures, emphasizing the need for robust corporate governance and ethical practices to foster trust among consumers and investors alike. Ultimately, the developments surrounding Hightimes and Levin illustrate the delicate balance that cannabis companies must maintain between pursuing growth opportunities and adhering to legal and ethical standards in an increasingly scrutinized market.

 

HIGH TIMES DRAMA GALORE, READ ON…

HIGH TIMES STORMY SIMON

WAS STORMY SIMON SET UP TO TALK THE FALL AT HIGH TIMES?



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media