Connect with us

lawsuit

Marijuana Retail Report

Published

8 months ago

on

Marijuana Retail Report



Ancient roots founded in Cleveland, fire rock rock, founded in Acron, and five more enterprises filed a lawsuit

Marijuana Ohio companies sued the regulators for the rules of the product and advertising, saying they are too strict and violate the law approved by voters.

Cleveland’s ancient roots, a fire rock based in the Akron The State Marijuana Program. The move took place almost two years after the election in November 2023 legalized recreational marijuana.

Sales of marijuana for adults It began in August 2024. The lawsuit states that Ohio requires companies to follow outdated recommendations from the medical cannabis program that does not comply with the new law.

“I thought we saw a little growth, and more and more people would find out and understand what was happening,” said Brian Wingfield, co-founder of “Kanabis”, one of the enterprises that sued. “It would be much more enjoyable if we feared in the recreational program.”

To read the rest of this article about Columbus Manager, Click here

(Tagstotranslate) trial (T) Ohio

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Federal

Marijuana Retail Report

Published

2 weeks ago

on

May 29, 2026

By

Marijuana Retail Report



Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers had no immediate comment

The Republican attorneys general of Nebraska, Indiana and Louisiana filed a lawsuit over the Memorial Day weekend to stop Trump’s Justice Department order to reclassify marijuana as a less harmful drug.

The lawsuit, which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has consolidated with a similar lawsuit by marijuana opponent Smart Approaches to Marijuana, alleges that the Trump administration bypassed its normal rulemaking process.

The AGs argue that the waiver of normal public notice and comment periods jeopardizes the validity of the changes and write that reclassifying marijuana could also violate the 1967 International Narcotics Control Treaty.

Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers had no immediate comment through a spokesman Wednesday, but he said many Nebraska law enforcement officials disagree with the president’s push to change how federal agencies classify marijuana.

The lawsuit challenges the federal government’s workaround, which essentially makes it a middleman that buys the drug from manufacturers, adds a nominal fee, and sells it back to meet the contract’s requirements.

Hilgers argued that loosening federal restrictions on marijuana as a Schedule I drug, like LSD and heroin, to a Schedule III drug, along with Tylenol with codeine, could make it easier to legalize recreational products.

To read the rest of this article on the Nebraska Examiner, Click here

Continue Reading

ascend wellness

Marijuana Retail Report

Published

4 months ago

on

February 9, 2026

By

Marijuana Retail Report



The lawsuit is based on an October 2024 tip filed with the AG’s office

In an antitrust lawsuit, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost accuses nine cannabis operators in various states of engaging in anti-competitive behavior designed to reduce product choices and artificially keep prices high, harming both consumers and smaller Ohio cannabis businesses.

The lawsuit stems from an October 2024 tip submitted to Yost’s office by an Ohio cannabis industry official alleging widespread “shelf sharing” by large vertically integrated cannabis companies operating in Ohio and across the country.

According to information later confirmed by the investigation, cannabis operators in various states entered into reciprocal purchasing agreements — coordinated at the national level — to favor each other’s products at Ohio dispensaries while reducing or eliminating purchases from Ohio’s independent growers and processors.

“Our investigation uncovered allegations of an industry-wide scheme designed to drive Ohio’s small businesses out of business,” Yost said. “Ohio’s antitrust laws protect competition and consumers, not backroom deals that rig the system for a select few.”

According to information, senior representatives of major operators operating in different states met in late 2022 and agreed to reduce purchases from independent companies to save shelf space for each other during a period of increased supply and lower prices. The tip also alleged that some companies have established apparent internal quotas, reserving a significant percentage of pharmacy shelves for products obtained through reciprocal agreements with other multi-state operators.

The defendants in the lawsuit are:

  • Ascend Wellness
  • Air health
  • The Cannabist Company
  • Cresco Laboratories
  • Kuralist
  • Green Thumb Industries
  • Jushi
  • Trulieve
  • summer

The lawsuit alleges that each defendant violated Ohio’s Valentine Act:

  • Conclusion of mutual trade agreements with competitors.
  • Sharing competitive confidential information.
  • Engaged in discriminatory distribution practices that disadvantaged independent cannabis operators in Ohio.

According to the complaint, these actions reduced product choice and quality for Ohio consumers, stifled innovation and allowed the defendants to maintain or increase hypercompetitive prices in the state’s cannabis market.

Attorney General Jost is seeking an injunction to stop the alleged wrongful conduct.

Source: Ohio Attorney General’s Office

Stay up to date!

Get all the news and information you need to grow your business straight to your inbox.



, , , , , , , , , ,




Continue Reading

advertising

Marijuana Retail Report

Published

8 months ago

on

September 29, 2025

By

Marijuana Retail Report



Last year, hemp Flora filed with a lawsuit against the State Council for the Fighting Cannabis

State regulators have reached a settlement with the Vermont company, which sued for restriction of retail advertising for cannabis products.

Last year, Cannabis Flora appealed against the State Council for the Cannabis control. Retail trade middlebury claimed that the Rules of Advertising Council were unreasonable and violation of free speech.

According to a settlement, which has not yet received permission in court, the cannabis stores will still be needed to sign all ads. But if the advice has not decided for five days, stores can continue with advertising.

In another shift, the store will now be able to promote their products on social media until photos are used. And they will no longer need the Council’s permit to engage in products in the store.

Read the rest of this article about Vermont Public, Click here

(Tagstotranslate) Advertising (T) Law (T) Left (T) Vermont

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media