Connect with us

Cannabis News

Ohio House Passes Bill To Remove Voter-Approved Marijuana Legalization Protections And Restrict Hemp Market

Published

6 months ago

on

The Ohio House of Representatives has passed a bill that would do just that make significant changes to the state’s voter-approved marijuana legalization law removing several protections for consumers, while also adding some new restrictions on hemp products intended to align the two sectors of the cannabis industry.

After passing through several House committees this week, with major amendments, the House approved Sen. Stephen Huffman’s (R) legislation on a vote of 87-8 on Wednesday.

Although the measure was previously approved by the Senate, it will have to return to that chamber for concurrence, or go to a bicameral conference committee, before going to the governor’s desk.

The House watered down some controversial provisions of the Senate-passed bill, but advocates are concerned that it would still make major changes to the marijuana law voters approve in 2023.

Rep. Brian Stewart (R), who has led the legislation through the House, argued before the vote that the legislation effectively achieves “carefully crafted compromise” among lawmakers with differing views on cannabis issues.

“It’s been very difficult to debate this bill, but most of our important bills usually are. Instead of being some kind of weak-sauce tie-breaker mash-up, this bill does what we claim we want to come to Columbus,” he said. “It tackles the issue head-on. It makes tough decisions. It respects and implements the views of residents and advocates from affected industries. This bill strikes a good balance between Ohioans’ individual liberties, their safety, the financial well-being of our local communities, and the need to protect the health and safety of Ohio’s children.”

Rep. Jamie Callender (R), who sponsored legislation to legalize marijuana before voters passed the reform on the ballot, said the bill is “not perfect,” but argued that lawmakers “must take action” to address intoxicating hemp and other pending issues.

“This is the revised code we’re writing,” he said. “I anticipate that there will be many more bills on these issues in the near and long term, as there should be … I will continue to work with all of them to make it better.”

While its supporters have described it as a less hands-off approach than the original Senate bill, the measure would make significant changes to existing legalization law, with several provisions that advocates say are in direct conflict with the will of voters and represent legislative overreach.

For example, the proposal would eliminate language in the current statute that provides anti-discrimination protections for people who legally use cannabis. It includes safeguards against adverse action in the context of child custody rights, the ability to perform organ transplants, and professional licensing.

It would also recriminalize possession of marijuana from any source other than a state-licensed Ohio dispensary or possession of marijuana from a legal household. Because of this, people can be charged with a felony for carrying cannabis purchased from a legal Michigan store in the Michigan area.

It would also ban the smoking of cannabis in outdoor public places, such as bar patios, and ban landlords from vaping marijuana in rental properties. Violation of this latter policy, even if it involves vaping in a person’s backyard in a rental property, would be a misdemeanor offense.

Karen O’Keefe, director of state policy for the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), said in a letter to House lawmakers on Wednesday that SB 56 today “eliminates key protections of the law enacted by voters and re-criminalizes harmless behaviors that voters legalized.”

“Please reject this erosion of the liberties established by the voters,” he said.

Unlike the Senate-passed version of the bill, the House alternative would send cannabis sales tax revenue to local governments.

The legislation, amended by the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, also adds new restrictions on the hemp market. With the exception of beverages, hemp products would only be allowed to be sold in licensed hemp dispensaries.

Stores and breweries would be allowed to sell hemp-derived THC drinks, with new advertising restrictions to avoid appealing to youth. Products for on-premise consumption would be limited to 5 mg of THC, but adults could buy drinks of up to 10 mg to take home. Stronger drinks could also be manufactured in Ohio, but only for sale to people outside the state.

The bill would also include a new $1.20 per liter tax on hemp beverages.

The measure Earlier on Wednesday, the Treasury Board also amended it to clarify that people seeking to have their marijuana possession charges dropped would not have to prove the exact amount of cannabis they possessed. The amendment would also allow for dismissal of dismissed marijuana charges, not just convictions.

The amendment also aligns the beverage cannabinoid policy with the beverage laws and clarifies that the penalties for selling marijuana, hemp beverages or cannabinoid products to a minor would be the same regardless of the type of product.

Wednesday’s House vote comes weeks after the governor issued emergency regulations banning the sale of hemp products for 90 dayswith instructions to the legislature to consider permanent regulations. Last week, however, a county judge ordered the state to enforce that policy in response to a legal challenge.

“Quite frankly, the legislature didn’t take action,” Gov. Mike DeWine (R) said in an interview published this week. “I’m still hopeful that the legislature will step in and take action.”

House Speaker Matt Huffman (R) recently commented on the relative lack of progress on marijuana and hemp legislation since voters approved legalization on the ballot in 2023, highlighting the stark divisions within the Republican caucus.

There are “people who think marijuana should be legalized and regulated,” others who “think hemp products should be on par with everything that happened in the statute that started and then “people, like me, who are prohibitionists, don’t think it should be legalized at all and should be rare,” he said.

“I would say the prohibitionists have lost this debate.”

—
It’s Marijuana Time tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters by pledging at least $25/month, you’ll get access to our interactive maps, charts, and audio calendars so you never miss a development.

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracking and become a Patreon supporter to gain access
—

Meanwhile, last month, the Ohio Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) introduced new proposed rules to underpin the state’s marijuana legalization law. establishing plans to update regulations on labeling and packaging requirements.

The proposal arrived a few weeks later Medical and adult marijuana sales in Ohio officially surpassed $3 billionData from the state Department of Commerce (DOC) shows.

the state About $703 million worth of recreational cannabis was sold in the first year the law was enactedAccording to data from DCC.

In March, a survey of 38 municipalities by the Ohio State University (OSU) Moritz School of Law found local leaders were “unequivocally opposed” to earlier proposals which would have cut planned funding..

Meanwhile, in Ohio, adults can buy more than double the amount of marijuana starting in June than were under previous limits, state officials determined that the market could sustainably supply patients and adult users of medical cannabis.

The governor announced his desire individually in March Marijuana tax revenue to support police training, local jails and behavioral health services. He said funding for police training was a top priority, even if it wasn’t approved by voters in 2023.

Ohio’s Senate President also pushed back against criticism of the Senate bill, claiming that the legislation does not respect the will of the electorate and it would have little effect on the products available in stores.

user photo Philip Steffan.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron on Patreon!

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Lighting science and advanced cultivation to take center stage at Dutch cannabis research tour

Published

10 hours ago

on

April 11, 2026

By











The joint MCPIR and Cultivation for Compounds research tour is returning to its regular position on the calendar. On June 8, before GreenTech Amsterdam opens at RAI, two cannabis research consortia from the Netherlands will host a one-day medicinal cannabis event at their research sites.

The morning program runs at MCPIR in Bleiswijk, and in the afternoon it moves to CfC’s Honselersdijk facility. Lunch is provided, and RAI Amsterdam bus transportation is available for participants traveling from the city.

Sonny Moerenhout, founder of Cultivators consultancy, has been organizing the event and will be one of the guest speakers. “MCPIR and CfC do the same kind of work, and to outsiders they might look like competitors,” he says. “But this event is about showing what Dutch horticulture is doing for cannabis. It’s better to do it together than separately.” Cultivators have also recently launched the Leafy Hydroponics Consortium, where infrastructure is being upgraded. LED lights, screens and high-pressure fog are being integrated into the setup. Sonny noted that the consortium had conducted tests with the existing configuration before switching to the new one, and that the improvement of the climate system was continuing as part of a multi-year program.

© Andrea Di Pastena | MMJDaily.com

With years of cannabis experience and knowledge, and now the consortium’s research expertise, Sonny says he brings the latest in advanced cultivation techniques. “Cannabis cultivation is moving incredibly fast, with price pressure on growers keeping pace with it. It’s critical to show growers how to meet the challenges with knowledge and information from the world’s horticultural hub.” Besides Sonny, at the MCPIR event, Mexx Holweg, PhD from Wageningen University, will also be coming up to talk about lighting. Sonny says the addition is aimed at bringing more breeders and licensed producers into the conversation. “With Mexx, we can bring even more breeders and LPs together for interactions with a focus on high-tech growth.”

The audience at the June 8 event typically includes medicinal cannabis producers, technology providers and scientific collaborators from across Europe and beyond. Registration is done directly through MCPIR and CfC; the organizers can be contacted at this address (email protected)

GreenTech Amsterdam will take place from June 9th to 11th at the RAI.

For more information:
Cultivators
(email protected)
crops.nl

Delphi










Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Rhode Island Marijuana Business License Lottery Blocked By Federal Judge Amid Challenge To Residency Rules

Published

10 hours ago

on

April 11, 2026

By

“Knowing that the Act faced legal challenges … the CCC went ahead with its plan to implement the Act and its licensing scheme. The resulting fallout will therefore be self-executing.”

By Christopher Shea, Rhode Island Currant

Almost 100 applicants competing 20 new cannabis retail licenses were to be issued by lottery May has been in limbo since a federal judge’s order this week halted the plan.

U.S. District Court Judge Melissa DuBose on Wednesday issued a preliminary injunction against the Rhode Island Cannabis Control Board. The commission is a defendant in three federal lawsuits filed by out-of-state employers over the state’s residency requirement for retail licenses.

DuBose’s order blocks regulators from holding a license lottery or even continuing to review and review retail license applications submitted to the commission until Dec. 29, 2025.

“It’s very frustrating right now,” Jason Calderon, a grower who applied for a retail license in North Kingstown, said in an interview. “This certainly could have been avoided. All we’ve done now is give existing monopolies more time to become monopolies.”

Commission spokeswoman Charon Rose said Friday that regulators were aware of the ruling and were reviewing the implications for the adult retail use licensing program.

“At this time, the commission is not in a position to provide a definitive timeline,” he said in an email to the Rhode Island Current. “Additional guidance will be provided as it becomes available.”

Legal challenges began in May 2024, California cannabis entrepreneur Justyna Jensen sue The Cannabis Control Commission in U.S. District Court in Providence argued that Rhode Island’s residency requirement violated the state’s commercial protections under the state’s Cannabis Act of 2022.

Jensen filed similar lawsuits in other states, including California and New York.

Jensen stated in his initial lawsuit that he intended to become a majority owner of a social equity business, a specialty license reserved for those affected by the war on drugs.

John Kenney, a Florida resident, filed a second federal lawsuit against the Cannabis Control Commission in May 2024 also challenging the residency requirement. Justin Palmore of California filed a third lawsuit on similar grounds on November 24, 2025.

None of the defendants were among the 97 companies vying for a Rhode Island license following the state’s call for applications late last year.

Passed by state lawmakers in 2022, the Rhode Island Cannabis Act called for 24 new retail stores across the state, with six licenses reserved for social equity applicants and another six for employee-owned cooperative stores.

Not all license types received applications in each of the six geographic areas, which allowed regulators to limit the maximum number of licenses to 20 statewide.

Out-of-state investors and ownership are permitted under the law, but a majority—51 percent—of a cannabis company must be owned by a Rhode Island resident.

DuBose dismissed Jensen and Kenney’s suits in February 2025, finding the complaints premature because state regulators had not finalized the rules governing Rhode Island’s retail licenses. The regulations were issued in May last year.

But the cases were revived last November by the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston, which ordered DuBose to issue rulings on the merits at least 45 days before the date the Cannabis Control Commission plans to issue retail licenses.

The deadline set by the Commission for the licenses planned in October would be granted in the second quarter of 2026, in May.

Did the state waste time?

The state argued in its legal filings that the residency requirement gives regulators power, jurisdiction and oversight over all retail licensees.

But DuBose eventually found that Rhode Island’s residency requirement was not well suited to advance the state’s interests. It also found that the plaintiffs would suffer irreparable harm because the commission agreed it would not authorize the 24 additional licenses allowed under state law.

The state also tried to get the plaintiffs’ licenses to be considered at the 11th hour. DuBose said the state had plenty of time to make changes to its rules.

“Knowing that the Act faced legal challenges in this Court, the CCC proceeded with its plan to implement the Act and its licensing scheme,” DuBose. he wrote. “The resulting fall will be purely self-inflicted.”

It’s the same line that has attorney Allan Fung, a former Republican Cranston mayor and congressional and gubernatorial candidate representing several retail applicants, questioning why the state didn’t act sooner to avoid the license freeze.

“It’s disappointing that the state didn’t fix the statute and fix these issues sooner, or find a compromise with these three plaintiffs, before people put their life savings at risk,” Fung said in a text message to the Rhode Island Current. “The industry cannot wait any longer.”

Licensing has certainly been slow for cannabis retailers.

It was more than a year after the state legalized recreational cannabis before a three-member commission charged with regulating the industry was unveiled in June 2023. The commission had to hire staff to write proposals and review rules adopted in other states. Rhode Island’s rules governing retail cannabis were finally approved in May 2025. Chairman Kim Ahern stepped down last October to become attorney general, and Gov. Dan McKee (D) has yet to name a successor.

In recent months, the remaining two commissioners considered slowing down the process further Staggering the draw of 20 licenses, instead of giving them all at once. No final decision was made at the last meeting held on March 13.

“It’s always been something the whole time,” Calderon said. “Now it’s this new hurdle.”

That hurdle means many applicants have been paying rent in their storefronts for months waiting to see if they’ll be selected for the license lottery.

“My very frustrated clients have invested tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars to follow a complicated set of rules at the state and local level only to be swept under the rug at the eleventh hour,” Fung said.

Calderon is a little better off financially, as he said the deal in place for the proposed store in North Kingstown doesn’t require rent to be paid until June.

“Obviously that’s going to come and go without a store,” he said. “I’ll probably lose the location because I won’t be able to cover and hold while the state figures out what the next plan is going to be.”

The regulations require that each application secure a location, including zoning approval from the city or town where the store is to be located. Andre Dev, founder of the Community Cannabis Network of Rhode Island, rules that acts as an incubator for many future working cooperatives.

“A lot of other states only require a fee and you don’t have to have your business ready,” he said in an interview. “Most of these applicants could not open the doors because there was no ready test.”

Dev applauded the fact that applicants were able to get those approvals on time after a three-month application window, which left the court dismayed that they never even filed in Rhode Island.

“Somehow their rights are more important than those of us who have put in the time and effort to do all this,” Dev said. “It’s up to the board to sort this out in a way that causes the least harm to people.”

DuBose suggested in his ruling that the state could refund applicants who decide it’s not worth the wait or transfer current applications to a hypothetical new process.

Both houses of the Rhode Island General Assembly have pending bills to remove the residency requirement. Legislation Sponsored by Representative Scott Slater, a Providence Democrat, the House Committee on Corporations heard it on March 12, where it was held for further scrutiny, standard practice for the bill’s first review.

“Obviously we’re going to have to go through something to fix that,” Slater said in an interview. “We need to make sure this doesn’t happen again. We definitely need to open more stores.”

Dev asked the commission to issue emergency rules within 30 days, removing the mandated language and establishing temporary application procedures consistent with the court’s ruling, noting that the state’s cannabis law declares all provisions severable.

“They have the power to deal with it,” he said.

The Cannabis Control Board is scheduled to meet on Friday, April 17 at 2:00 p.m.

This story was first published by the Rhode Island Currant.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

How a trafficking scheme triggered price compression in Germany

Published

1 day ago

on

April 10, 2026

By

The thread connecting the Erva Daninha operation to the current price compression in the Portuguese cannabis export market does not begin in Lisbon or Berlin.

According to an industry source with direct knowledge of the scheme, the criminal network that would eventually lead to a sector-wide regulatory crackdown allegedly operated through a mechanism that exploited the loosest link in Portugal’s export chain. Some non-EU countries are said to have issued import permits, which were used by European operators with export permits on the Portuguese side, who sent these documents to Infarmed for approval and shipment of the product. The Portuguese authorities finally called their counterparts from the countries in question to verify the documentation, the paperwork was not completed. The main actors, the source says, cashed in and left. “The worst thing is that Portugal was seen as the epicenter of pharmaceutical production in the world. They lost their reputation.”

Investigators determined that the criminal organization, aware of flaws and weaknesses in Portugal’s cannabis export inspection and control system, bought pharmaceutical companies and created authorized wholesale and export entities, then used false documentation and certificates to ship thousands of kilos to illegal markets. Europe and Africa.On May 20, 2025, the National Anti-Drug Trafficking Unit of the Judicial Police carried out 64 search and seizure orders from the north to the south of the country and on the island of Madeira, arresting several suspects. The operation was called Erva Daninha.

Legitimate operators were careful to distinguish themselves from the actors they were investigating. Nuno Martens from Takodana He said he welcomed the attack. “I don’t understand why people are afraid of this. It’s a good thing that the PJ is doing these raids. If there are things that need to be investigated, that’s good.” The real challenges of the market were soon to materialize.

the conclusion
In the months that followed, several licenses were revoked. Infarmed tightened oversight and added new paperwork requirements, creating an ever-changing regulatory framework that made scaling, exports, and day-to-day operations significantly more difficult. It all startedAs one Portuguese producer said, when Infarmed began to inspect the company more closely May police raid.

One processor’s journey shows how the frozen product eventually became a pricing weapon. According to the source, the companies whose licenses were revoked had between 10 and 14 tons in inventory. Initially written off as a loss, the tide quickly turned when Infarmed reinstated those licenses and lots were released. According to the source, the operators did not want that product anymore, it was already registered as a loss, so the logical conclusion was to remove it as soon as possible. This is how significant amounts of cannabis flowed into Germany at one euro per gram, forcing prices down.

According to market data, by autumn 2025, GACP-certified high-THC flower in Germany was already between €0.75 and €2.30 per gram, while EU-GMP-certified material commanded a clear premium of €2.15 to €3.55 per gram. By the spring of 2026, prices had fallen further. High-THC GACP flower ranged from €0.60 to €2.50 per gram, while EU-GMP high-THC flower softened to €2.00 to €3.48.

Reclaiming reputation
The reputational damage had already spread beyond the prices. Grower active in Portugal said MMJ Daily The trust issues created by the raid exacerbated everything that followed. “They had certain certificates, but they thought they were authorized and they made movements that were not there.” Now when operators want to structure deals through Portugal, the answer from international partners is: Except for Portugal. Malta’s medical cannabis business grew by 1,000% last year.

In early April 2026, at least eight more cannabis operators were removed from Infarmed’s listings, in what analysts described as an unprecedented drop in all. license categories. Whether these departures reflect non-renewal of administration, business failure or the ongoing effects of the 2024 freeze is not yet entirely clear.

A sign of recovery is emerging, however. Another source familiar with the sector points to a new digital UN verification system for import and export documentation, which will be rolled out by the end of April 2026, as a potential turning point. The system is already receiving positive early reviews from operators who have seen it in action. If he delivers on that promise, the source believes Portugal’s reputation could begin to recover within the next three months.

A trafficking ring that allegedly used fake import permits and European export licenses led to the police operation. The police operation resulted in a regulatory crackdown. The crackdown froze tens of tons of legitimate products at Portuguese facilities. The frozen product, once launched, hit the German market at a price that reset everyone else’s expectations. The main actors, according to the source, are still at large.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media