Connect with us

Cannabis News

Texas Judge Allows Smokable Hemp And Other Products To Be Sold, Blocking State Ban From Being Enforced

Published

2 months ago

on

A Texas judge has issued a temporary injunction that continues to prevent state officials from enforcing the news Regulations restricting access to hemp-derived products such as THCA combustible flower. Meanwhile, the state Supreme Court in a separate case allows regulators to ban delta-8 THC.

Friday’s ruling by Judge Daniella DeSeta Lyttle follows another judge last month who issued a temporary restraining order on the ban on hemp products. According to the latest order, sales of hemp products can continue until at least July 27.

Decisions a a lawsuit filed by a coalition of hemp industry leaders and advocacy organizations The Department of State Health Services (DSHS) and the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) have accused lawmakers of effectively circumventing the law. ban the sale and manufacture of certain hemp consumable products.

Under state law passed by the legislature and governor in 2019, the suit says cannabis products are legal if they contain no more than 0.3 percent delta-9 THC. But regulators at DSHS and HHSC recently approved a “total delta-9 THC” limit using a post-decarboxylation formula that includes tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) in the calculation.

Texas lawmakers passed legislation to severely restrict hemp products in the 2025 session, but Gov. Greg Abbott (R) vetoed it and did not make it into law.

Lyttle said Friday that the plaintiffs have established “a possible right to relief on the merits of their claims.”

“In the absence of injunction, plaintiffs will suffer immediate and continuing harm to their business operations, legal rights and economic interests,” he said. he wrote. “These damages include disruption of established supply chains, loss of market access, impairment of goodwill and customer relationships, and the risk of significant compliance costs and enforcement consequences under the rules that plaintiffs have proven invalid.”

The hemp industry lawsuit, which also lists Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) as a defendant, also calls into question large increases in business license fees that were approved by regulators. Under the new rules, the cost of a manufacturer’s license increased from $250 to $10,000 per facility, while the retailer registration fee increased from $150 to $5,000 per location.

While the judge who issued a temporary restraining order on the product restrictions last month did not grant a stay on the new fees, Lyttle included them within the scope of his temporary injunction.

“These measures do not impose policy choices of the Legislature; they supersede them,” says the initial complaint filed by plaintiffs Texas Hemp Business Council (THBC) and Hemp Industry & Farmers of America (HIFA). “And they do so against the backdrop of a constitutional legislative process that ran its entire course — from the legislative passage of Senate Bill 3 to the governor’s veto, two failed special sessions — and produced an ambiguous result: no new law. Texas law does not allow agencies to override that result through rulemaking.”

“Texas has long promoted itself as a national leader in economic growth and regulatory stability. It is a state committed to fostering innovation, supporting legitimate businesses, and maintaining a predictable legal environment in which businesses can operate and invest,” he says. “Consistent with that vision, Texas has chosen to authorize and regulate the manufacture, distribution and sale of consumable hemp products (‘CHP’) through a comprehensive statutory framework enacted by the Legislature in 2019.”

“Plaintiffs acknowledge this framework and the State’s interest in ensuring that CHPs are produced and sold in a safe, responsible and lawful manner,” the lawsuit states.

In a state Supreme Court ruling Friday, the justices overturned a lower court’s order that prevented regulators from treating delta-8 THC as a controlled substance.

“The companies that developed these products claim that the legislature opened up the market to them in 2019,” the court’s opinion says. “So when the commissioner sought to clarify that, in fact, the legislature had not clarified the potent levels of delta-8 THC manufactured in consumable hemp products, a group of businesses and consumers asked a court to rewrite the controlled substance schedules for him and the department, especially since the legislature legalized delta-8 THC in 2019 making the commissioner’s actions impossible and ultra vires.”

“The trial court granted that relief by way of a temporary injunction, which was affirmed by the appeals court. We now conclude that the lower courts exceeded their jurisdiction,” the justices said. find. “If the legislature wants to legalize powerful drugs, it has all the tools it needs to do so, and that is inevitable, as we expect such a big change in social policy. The role of the courts is simply to evaluate the state of the law as it stands.”

Separately, Texas officials conditionally approved more new medical marijuana business licenses As part of a law being implemented to significantly expand the state’s cannabis program.

A recent survey showed that Texas voters overwhelmingly support legalizing medical marijuana they still do not know, to a large extent, about the existing program.

in march Texas voters approved a question to legalize marijuana that showed up in the state’s Democratic primary voting.

Another statewide survey released in February found that Texas voters don’t like how state leaders and lawmakers have handled marijuana and THC policy issues. In the poll, many voters (40 percent) said they disapprove of how their elected officials have approached the issue, according to the poll. 29 percent said they approve of how cannabis issues have been handled, while 31 percent said they had no opinion either way.

A separate survey released last year proved this Many Texas voters want the state’s marijuana laws to be “less strict.” And among the issues examined by members of parliament in the last special sessions, the voters said that a proposal to deal with the regulation of hemp was one of the least important.

Meanwhile, the lieutenant governor and speaker of the House recently announced that the state will continue with their own ibogaine research program The drug companies did not submit proposals to meet the requirements and standards for receiving state funds under a recently passed law to begin clinical trials with the psychedelic.

Image courtesy of AnonMoos.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Village Farms International leads B.C. cannabis producers in global export push

Published

8 hours ago

on

June 27, 2026

By

Village Farms International, one of the world’s largest cannabis production facilities located in Delta, BC, increased its export volumes by more than 500 percent by the end of 2025, with international sales reaching US$37.9 million, or just over 20 percent of total cannabis revenue of US$188 million. The main export markets are Germany, Australia, the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Israel.

The company is also expanding, developing an additional 550,000 square feet of greenhouse space across the street from its main facility, designed to support both domestic and international cultivation. Orville Bovenschen, VFI’s global president of operations, points to the excise burden as a permanent strain on the domestic economy: “If you look at how much we paid in excise last year, it’s astronomical,” he says, although VFI declined to provide specific figures.

Walker Patton, one of the founders of the BC Cannabis Alliance, which represents about 50 licensed growers in the province, frames the domestic regulatory environment in stark terms: “With the rules that this industry was set up for, it’s like doing business right out of the gate.” Canada’s excise tax structure charges by weight instead of market price, meaning that since wholesale prices have fallen to roughly half of initial projections, effective tax rates for producers have risen.

© This is Holland

Sweetgrass Cannabis, a micro-farm located in the Kootenay region, now derives 60 to 70 percent of its sales from international markets after retreating from provinces such as Ontario and Alberta. Company CEO Gemma Hayes says: “Margins, as well as export opportunities, drove our decision.” Ontario’s wholesale markup of up to 25 per cent, layered with excise taxes, spurred what Hayes described as a “race to the bottom.”

Rubicon Organics, a Vancouver-based publicly traded company, entered international markets last year and recently opened a 47,500-square-foot facility in Hope in part to meet overseas demand. Speaking from the International Cannabis Conference in Berlin, Mathieu Aubin, director of marketing and new business, said: “Canada is very well positioned to access international markets for reliable and safe cannabis,” noting that reliability and product integrity are key to gaining access to the medical market.

Not all producers have equal access to these markets. Alex Rumi, founder of grower Good Buds out of Salt Spring Island, said established export markets are structured around an indoor pharmaceutical-style model that hurts sun-grown cannabis, and that Canada’s export system “works for big growers and doesn’t work for craft.” Julia Cameron, president of Cannabis Cultivators of BC and chair of communications and corporate affairs for the VFI, added that growers must secure permits for each shipment while navigating different rules across countries, creating a prohibitive barrier for small operators.

BC has more than 200 licensed growers and accounts for roughly a quarter of Canada’s legal cannabis production, but represents only 14 percent of national exports. Lana Popham, B.C.’s Minister of Agriculture and Food, points to the FIFA World Cup games in Vancouver as a near-term possibility: “It will be interesting to see how many people engage with what is a great product here in B.C.”

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Congressman And Other Media Outlets Join Marijuana Moment’s Push For DEA To Livestream Rescheduling Hearing

Published

8 hours ago

on

June 27, 2026

By

The momentum of the Marijuana Moment request for direct public and media access to historic federal cannabis rescheduling hearings they are being joined by a member of Congress and other reporters starting next week.

Representative Steve Cohen (D-TN) sent a letter to the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) on Friday, calling the ongoing marijuana rescheduling process “historic.”

“I am writing to request that the hearings be made available to the public in real time,” Cohen wrote to DEA Administrator Terrance Cole. “Live streaming technologies have become ubiquitous and a common way for Americans to interact with the government. In late 2024, in a similar effort, your agency authorized live streaming of proceedings ‘due to the public interest in this matter’ and continued your agency’s ‘commitment to procedural transparency.’

“I see no reason why that reason wouldn’t hold today, especially when it comes to such an important and impactful issue,” the congressman wrote. “I have long been an advocate for transparency in court proceedings and I believe this is a rare opportunity to inform the public about rulemaking and administrative litigation.”

Cohen’s letter follows a couple Marijuana Moment’s attorney presented the petitions to Cole and DEA Chief Administrative Law Judge Derek Julius. to request access to a live stream of the hearing on the proposal to move cannabis from Schedule I to Title III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) — which includes only opponents of the reform as participants.

Also on Friday, an attorney from Portfolio Media, Inc., which publishes Law360, sent Cole a letter saying it “agrees with Marijuana Moment’s request” for streaming access.

“This approach is consistent with DEA’s prior approach to this hearing and the compelling public interest in rescheduling marijuana under the CSA, a policy change with profound social, legal, and regulatory implications,” the letter states.

Requiring observers to attend in person “limits real-time information about a consequential policy development to the press and a small audience in attendance, and removes the ability of the press to report on that development,” he says. “Live streaming is a safe, continuous and fair way to ensure meaningful public access and advance the DEA’s stated commitment to transparency.”

Separately, an attorney representing the cannabis publication Cultivated Media and also on behalf of New York Times reporter Ashley Southall sent a letter to the DEA administrator saying they “want the ability to monitor the proceedings in real time, to provide readers with reports on the progress and perspective of testimony and evidence during the hearing.”

“Cultivated Media, Ashley Southall and Marijuana Moment and all the other media because of this access to the live stream can simultaneously report on issues of important public concern related to a historic hearing,” he said.

The DEA announced Thursday that it would make the transcript available at the end of the multi-day hearing, but Marijuana Moment attorney Joseph A. Bondy wrote in his letter Thursday that it would not help the public follow the proceedings in real time on a daily basis.

“The final transcript is useful, but not a substitute for access to a live broadcast. A live broadcast allows the public and the press to observe the hearing as it unfolds without contesting admissions, filling the courtroom, or disrupting the proceedings,” the letter to Cole says. “After reviewing, correcting and releasing the transcript weeks after the testimony, the opportunity for real-time observation, timely reporting and public information response has passed.”

“For a large public audience seeking serious coverage of federal cannabis policy, Marihuana Moment is an important channel through which the public can understand these proceedings.”

“To the extent that the DEA now believes that live streaming is inappropriate, despite the DEA’s prior directive in this rulemaking, Marijuana Moment respectfully requests a written explanation identifying the specific basis for that conclusion, including why the public interest and transparency that previously warranted live streaming are being overridden here,” Bondy wrote.

—
Marijuana Moment’s journalism is made possible by readers like you, who value this work enough to support us monthly pledges on Patreon. If you rely on our reports to stay informed of important developments in cannabis, please help us do this becoming a permanent subscriber today.

Backing us at the $25/month level, you’ll have access to our Bill Tracker so you don’t miss any important marijuana legislation in your state.
—

Separately, cannabis advocates sent a letter Thursday to Julius, the DEA judge, saying he would not consider submissions from outside parties, also requesting access to the live stream.

“Many of the patients most interested in this procedure cannot travel to Arlington, Virginia. Many are disabled, immunocompromised, elderly, financially limited, or managing serious medical conditions,” states the letter from Americans for Safe Access, Veterans Initiative-22, US Pain Foundation, Realm of Caring, Montel Williams and others.

“Patients and advocates who can travel will also be unable to physically wait in line for an uncertain chance of admission, only to be turned away when limited seats are filled,” they wrote. “So the audience may technically be open to the public, but virtually inaccessible to most.”

Meanwhile, the DEA said in a new filing that its witness list for the hearing includes a doctor. Testify on “How Medical Marijuana Provides Medical Benefit to Pain Patients.”

Separately, the opponents who are participating in the trial have presented their declarations this week anticipate the anti-marijuana arguments they intend to make during the procedure.

The hearing it will start on June 29 and end before July 15.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche in April He issued an order that immediately reclassified the state’s licensed medical cannabisas well as marijuana products approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under Schedule I through Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

According to a separate order signed by the acting attorney general, the upcoming hearing will include Class III marijuana.

Preliminary hearing process on the marijuana redistricting process initiated by the Biden administration It was halted last year amid allegations of improper communications and witness selection.

the current The marijuana redistricting process is being challenged in several ways which have been upheld by a federal Court of Appeals. those pieces of State attorneys general have filed lawsuits against cannabis reform, Opponents of marijuana legalization and a a cannabis-based biopharmaceutical corporation.

Meanwhile, the reorganization of state-licensed medical cannabis is already having a major impact.

The Congressional Research Service published a report on the current rescheduling of cannabis Certified patients with medical marijuana from state licensed dispensaries are now eligible for Class III. “The order appears to allow end users to use marijuana medically without a CSA prescription,” he says.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has published a Draft update to a gun purchase form to recognize the legal status of medical marijuana in the reprogramming. The revised section of the question states that only the “recreational use or possession of marijuana” is federally prohibited, omitting the prior form’s mention of medical cannabis.

The US Treasury and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) said they plan to issued new tax guidelines for the marijuana industry after reprogramming. The reform will benefit state-licensed marijuana businesses by allowing them to take federal tax deductions that are currently prohibited under IRS Code Section III, known as Section 280E.

Even the DEA, which has long opposed cannabis legalization and accused the Biden administration of stalling the initiative in the reorganization process, has done so. It launched a registration process for legal marijuana businesses in the state to take advantage of the federal benefits that come with the reform.

The Department of Transport, on the other hand, issued guidelines stating this use Legal medical cannabis in the state is still no excuse for truck drivers to test positive for drugspilots and other safety-sensitive personnel.

A congressional committee recently Federal officials voted to block further steps to reschedule cannabis.

read it the letters About DEA admin access to live streaming:

Marihuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

New access solution for cannabis facilities designed to address limitations of traditional gates

Published

1 day ago

on

June 26, 2026

By











SpaceGuard Products, a North American manufacturer of wire mesh security solutions and security protection systems, has released the BeastWire® Tunnel Door. This access solution is designed to overcome the limitations of traditional balanced doors and is aimed at cannabis cultivation, processing, packaging and distribution environments. The BeastWire Tunnel Door is designed for installations that require vertical clearance, reliable movement and floor space efficiency.

The BeastWire Tunnel Door provides top clearance with no tracks in the operating path of the door. It is suitable for spaces where overhead paths are not feasible, such as facilities that use high-mast forklifts, oversized pallet loads or specialized material handling equipment. Tall equipment can pass through the opening unhindered, allowing for continuous workflow and flexibility in equipment movement.

© SpaceGuard Products

The door uses a track system designed to create consistent movement. This addresses issues such as stuttering, binding, and misalignment that can occur with conventional sliding or counterbalanced designs. The track controls the path of the door so that the locking mechanism aligns with each cycle, allowing operators to close the door with relatively low force.

Unlike lower track systems that require a soil trench, the BeastWire Tunnel Door mounts above ground. This avoids cutting the installation slab, simplifies installation and reduces maintenance requirements. The system can be installed as a retrofit or in new construction, without changing the floor.

© SpaceGuard Products

The door frame and retractable design reduces the need for side supports and additional space on the side of the door. This results in a smaller footprint and more usable surface area. The gate has the same construction approach as other BeastWire systems.

The BeastWire Tunnel Door is a high-access door designed for strength and ease of use in cannabis industry facilities.

For more information:
SpaceGuard products
Email: (email protected)
spaceguardproducts.com/










Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media