Connect with us

Cannabis News

California Inches Towards Interstate Cannabis Agreements

Published

on


It’s no secret that state cannabis markets across the nation are suffering badly. Because of I.R.C. 280E, lack of access to financial institutions, massive operational expenses, plunging prices, and just gluts of production, it’s not pretty out there. However, there’s a newish light at the end of the tunnel, at least for California and other states that are game: interstate cannabis agreements. If interstate cannabis agreements open up between cannabis states, then maybe just maybe the cannabis industry can be pulled back from the brink of its hard landing in 2023.

Interstate cannabis agreements

Recall in September of last year, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 1326 into law (and it became effective on January 1 of this year), introducing the possibility of interstate cannabis agreements. California wasn’t the first state to do this. Oregon actually did it in 2019. Under SB 1326:

MAUCRSA specifies that its provisions shall not be construed to authorize or permit a licensee to transport or distribute, or cause to be transported or distributed, cannabis or cannabis products outside the state, unless authorized by federal law. This bill would make an exception to the above-described prohibition and would authorize the Governor to enter into an agreement with another state or states authorizing medicinal or adult-use commercial cannabis activity, or both, between entities licensed under the laws of the other state or states and entities operating with a state license pursuant to MAUCRSA, provided that the commercial cannabis activities are lawful and subject to licensure under the laws of the other state or states.

Pursuant to SB 1326, these interstate cannabis agreements would be between states. Not licensees. Licensees would still need to engage in contracts with each other for the actual import, export, and distribution of cannabis across state borders. Governor Newsom would be able to enter into these interstate cannabis agreements with governors from other states so long as:

  1. The commercial cannabis activities are lawful and subject to licensure under the laws of the contracting state; and
  2. With respect to the interstate transportation of cannabis or cannabis products, the agreement prohibits both of the following: (a) The transportation of cannabis and cannabis products by any means other than those authorized under both the laws of the contracting state and the regulations of the [California Department of Cannabis Control (“DCC”)]. (b) The transportation of cannabis and cannabis products through the jurisdiction of a state, district, commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States that does not authorize that transportation.

Under SB 1326, the interstate cannabis agreement also requires that the contracting state agree that its cannabis licensees be bound by California’s requirements around public health and safety, track and trace, testing, inspection, packaging and labeling, and adulterated and misbranded cannabis. The contracting state must also impose “restrictions upon advertising, marketing, labeling, or sale within the contracting state that meet or exceed the restrictions” in California for the same. And all California taxes apply, too.

Further, out of state licensees (“foreign licensees”) cannot engage in commercial cannabis activity in California “without a state license, or engage in commercial cannabis activity within a local jurisdiction without a license, permit, or other authorization issued by the local jurisdiction.” So, foreign licensees will also be plagued by California’s local control issues if they seek to do business in one of our cities or counties that allows for commercial cannabis activity.

The federal contingency for interstate cannabis agreements

Interstate cannabis commerce would be a dream for many licensees, and especially this kind of interstate commerce which would only: (a) be between cannabis states; and (b) involve existing state licensees (and not, let’s say, Costco or Amazon (yet)). But the passage of SB 1326 didn’t automatically create interstate cannabis commerce for California licensees. In fact, it’s creation is dependent upon:

  1. Federal law changing to allow for the interstate transfer of cannabis or cannabis products between authorized commercial cannabis businesses, i.e., legalization.
  2. Federal law enacted that specifically prohibits the expenditure of federal funds to prevent the interstate transfer of cannabis or cannabis products between authorized commercial cannabis businesses.
  3. The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) issuing an opinion or memorandum allowing or tolerating the interstate transfer of cannabis or cannabis products between authorized commercial cannabis businesses.
  4. The California Attorney General issuing a written opinion through the process . . . that implementation of interstate cannabis agreements will not result in “significant legal risk” to the State of California based on review of federal judicial decisions and administrative actions.

DCC and the California Attorney General

As reported by Politico last week, the DCC is going for option 4, which is really the only realistic choice right now. In an eight-page request and de facto legal brief, the DCC asks the State Attorney General’s office for an opinion in regards to whether interstate cannabis agreements will result in “significant legal risk” to the state, given that cannabis remains an illegal Schedule I controlled substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”).

To assist the State A/G with this request, the DCC articulates three legal arguments as to why California won’t ever feel the heat from the feds if Governor Newsom starts signing interstate cannabis agreements:

  1. The feds can’t dragoon the states into adopting or enforcing federal laws. Invoking the “anti-commandeering principle“, Congress can’t interfere with a state’s right to pass its own laws where Congress has not already legislated directly– even if interstate commerce is triggered. While the federal government can regulate private individuals, it cannot do the same to states. The DCC then requests that the state A/G forego a preemption analysis since it’s not relevant here and where no “positive conflict” with federal law exists anyway. After all, the feds can still prosecute individuals (and cannabis businesses) that choose to engage in interstate commerce.
  2. The CSA doesn’t criminalize states legalizing cannabis, and state officials are accordingly immune if they enforce and/or administer state cannabis laws and rules. The DCC also tells the State A/G not to sweat issues like aiding, abetting, and conspiracy for state officials and employees in this context because they’re not actually engaged in cannabis trafficking that violates the CSA. Lastly, the DCC cites to Gonzalez v. Raich to point out that the CSA doesn’t distinguish between interstate and intrastate commerce: both are equally as illegal under the CSA. In any case, California won’t suffer any greater liability than what already exists if interstate cannabis agreements are a go.
  3. As a throwaway argument, in regards to medical cannabis interstate commerce agreements, the DCC states that California is also safe from “significant risk” of federal enforcement because of the 2014 Rohrabacher-Farr-Blumenauer Amendment. The power of that Amendment to stop the feds from criminally prosecuting medical cannabis businesses (even though it doesn’t change the CSA) was tested in real time in California in the MAMM case in 2015, and then confirmed again in the McIntosh case in 2016 (at least for states in the Ninth Circuit).

States rights and DOJ enforcement

As I see it, the DCC is really hanging its hat on states’ rights and dual sovereignty in pushing the State A/G to opine that there’s no “significant legal risk” to California because of SB 1326. The anti-commandeering doctrine is not actually present in the Constitution, itself, though. The U.S. Supreme Court created the doctrine based on the 10th Amendment in two cases, New York v. United States in 1992, and Printz v. United States in 1997. The most recent application of the doctrine came in the 2018 decision in Murphy v. NCAA regarding New Jersey’s commencement of legal sports betting despite federal prohibition of the same. The U.S. Supreme Court sided with Jersey, ruling that “Congress may not simply ‘commandeer the legislative process of the States by directly compelling them to enact and enforce a federal regulatory program.”

I think the DCC is right about the anti-commandeering principle. I think the weakness though is around interstate commerce, and the DCC can’t ignore the 2005 Raich case, which holds that Congress’ Commerce Clause authority includes the power to prohibit the local cultivation and use of cannabis in compliance with California law.

The DCC likely rightly points out, however, that the foregoing doesn’t matter for the State. The State and its officials are highly unlikely to be prosecuted for anything at all. At most, the federal government might sue California to try to overturn SB 1326 (although I don’t see that happening under President Biden’s DOJ). Private citizens are the ones who will be on the line for enforcement because California wouldn’t act if the feds started punishing people for moving inventory under SB 1326 (that’s also why no positive conflict exists).

I think even if the DCC is successful in getting a positive opinion from the State A/G,  what really matters is what enforcement by the DOJ (which is essentially controlled by the U.S. Attorneys in each District) looks like for private cannabis enterprise. In all, interstate cannabis agreements may be a political win for California, they will mean nothing if the DOJ doesn’t also play ball when it comes to enforcement.

For more on cannabis interstate commerce legislation, check out the following posts:



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Cannabis and the Authoritarian State

Published

on

By


authoritarians and weed

Cannabis and the Authoritarian State

Cannabis has been legal for longer than it has been illegal. Let that sink in for a minute. For thousands of years, humans cultivated and consumed cannabis freely across civilizations and continents. It wasn’t until the early 1900s that we witnessed a massive push to drive hemp and cannabis into the black market, primarily due to industrial competition from petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, and other industrial applications.

What makes cannabis so threatening to powerful interests? For starters, hemp and cannabis are highly versatile crops with over 50,000 different uses, from medicine to textiles to fuel. Even more remarkable is how this plant is hardwired to work with the human body through our endocannabinoid system—a biological network we didn’t even discover until the 1990s.

Perhaps most threatening of all is that cannabis is insanely easy to grow. This means that if the plant helps you with a particular physical ailment, you have the ability to grow your own medicine indefinitely. No insurance premiums, no wait lists, no pharmaceutical middlemen—just you cultivating your own healing directly from the earth.

Authoritarians do not like this, not one bit. When people can meet their own needs independently, power structures lose their grip. When citizens can think differently without permission, control systems begin to fail. So today, we’re going to look at the interesting relationship between authoritarianism and cannabis, and how this humble plant plays a key role in keeping you free.

We’ve already established the versatility of cannabis, but there’s another element that those old D.A.R.E. PSAs inadvertently reveal about what authoritarians think about cannabis. I’m talking, of course, about “behavior.” You see, in an authoritarian system, you and I are but cogs in the machine. We’re the expendables who should be proud to work ourselves to death for our “fearless leaders.”

This is precisely why certain ideas, philosophies, religions, movements, books, and substances are typically banned in authoritarian regimes. Take North Korea as an example: everything from the type of television citizens watch to the music they hear is a tightly spun spell designed to keep the populace in check. While they don’t have explicit laws against hemp (they actually grow it industrially), smoking psychoactive cannabis is strictly forbidden.

Contrast this with places like Malaysia, where you can get up to 5 years for possessing just 20 grams of cannabis, and even face the death penalty depending on the situation. These authoritarians don’t play around when it comes to cannabis because they know it affects the behavior of their populace in ways they can’t control.

The question becomes: what behavior do they fear so much that cannabis produces within the individual?

The answer is a critical mind. People who consume cannabis often begin to question their own belief systems. Most regular users undergo some transformation in their values and perspectives. Cannabis has a unique way of helping people see beyond cultural programming and think outside established paradigms. It can make the familiar strange and the strange familiar—a psychological state that’s antithetical to authoritarian control.

This independent thinking runs counter to the narrative of authoritarians who wish to maintain a tight grip on social consciousness. If even 10% of a population begins to pivot in their behavior within a regime, it can have massive ripple effects. Just look at cannabis in the US—it went from being demonized to being embraced by the majority in less than 80 years, despite massive propaganda efforts.

For authoritarians, psychoactive cannabis isn’t primarily a threat to public health and wellbeing—it’s a threat to the health and wellbeing of authoritarianism itself. When people start thinking differently, they start living differently. When they start living differently, they start demanding different. And that’s the beginning of the end for any system built on unquestioning obedience.

Beyond the threat to thought control, there’s another reason why drugs in general remain illegal: the state can use prohibition as a weapon against the populace. This isn’t conspiracy theory—it’s documented history.

Take Nixon’s war on drugs. His domestic policy chief, John Ehrlichman, later admitted: “We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities.” Nixon essentially placed cannabis on the Controlled Substances Act because he needed an excuse to shut down anti-war protests and target Black communities.

Since hippies and anti-war protesters were smoking “freedom grass,” making it illegal would circumvent their freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, and more importantly—turn free citizens into state property. It’s a win-win if you’re an authoritarian looking to silence dissent.

Then there’s the whole “boogeyman” complex that prohibition creates. We’re told “drug dealers” are roaming the streets preying on innocents, giving them “marihuanas” so they can do vile things. What the government conveniently leaves out is how the banks these “dealers” use to launder their money remain untouched. They don’t mention the shadier dealings of law enforcement either—like running guns into Mexico (eventually leading to the death of one of their own), or spraying poison on crops, killing and hospitalizing people because, you know…”Drugs are bad!”

Authoritarians cannot let go of the value that keeping the most widely used illicit substance in the world illegal provides them. This explains why the US hasn’t federally legalized cannabis despite nearly 80% of Americans supporting some form of legalization. It’s not because they don’t have enough research or that they’re genuinely concerned about public health—it’s because prohibition gives them all the privileges of violating constitutional rights while siphoning money into their coffers.

Drug prohibition creates a perpetual enemy that can never be defeated, allowing endless justification for surveillance, militarized police, asset forfeiture, and expansion of state power. What authoritarian could resist such a convenient tool?

Cannabis is a plant. You can’t make nature illegal—it’s counter to the human experience. When governments attempt to criminalize a naturally occurring organism that humans have cultivated and used for thousands of years, they reveal the absurdity of their position and the limits of their authority.

While the United States isn’t a full-on authoritarian state (yet), the truth is that many authoritarian elements have played out over the years. You only need to look as far as the war on drugs to see how the state utilizes prohibition as a weapon to their advantage. From no-knock raids to civil asset forfeiture to mass incarceration, drug laws have erected a parallel legal system where constitutional protections often don’t apply.

The fundamental truth is that cannabis is not only versatile and medicinal, it gives you back your autonomy in multiple ways. It helps you think for yourself. It allows you to grow your own medicine. It connects you with a plant that humans have used ceremonially, medicinally, and industrially throughout our history. And this autonomy is something authoritarians cannot stand—free individuals who know how to think beyond the narratives they’re fed.

Cannabis doesn’t just get you high—it offers a perspective from which the absurdities of prohibition become glaringly obvious. Perhaps this is why, as state after state legalizes, we’re witnessing the slow but steady unraveling of one of the most enduring authoritarian policies in American history.

So if you count yourself among those who value freedom of thought and bodily autonomy, who believe that nature doesn’t require government permission, and who understand that true liberty includes the right to explore your own consciousness—well, maybe it’s time to toke one up for freedom!

 

LEGALIZING CANNABIS IS NOT ENOUGH, READ ON..

LEAGLIZATION OF CANNABIS

WHY LEGALIZING CANNABIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING…



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Stop Using Bat Poop to Fertilize Your Weed Plants Immediately, Here is Why…

Published

on

By


bat poop for weed

Don’t Fertilize Your Weed with Bat Poop

 

Fertilization is a critical step for growing healthy marijuana plants.

They help provide essential nutrients for marijuana in various stages of growth, while promoting plant growth. There are dozens of different fertilizers to choose from in the market; growers can choose based on budget, nutrients needed, location, season, and much more. But not all fertilizers are made equally – of course, some are of better quality than others.

That said, there are some rather unusual fertilizers that can be used on plants. These may include, but are not limited to: coffee, milk, grass clippings, banana peels, fish tank water, potato water, and even urine! Yes, it does sound strange, but to gardening enthusiasts, there is nutritional value to be found in each of these things, which can make them suitable fertilizers depending on the circumstances.

For example, grass clippings make excellent mulch and can provide potassium, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Urine is a potent source of nitrogen as well as phosphorus. Banana peels are rich in calcium, which is excellent for promoting root growth while helping supply oxygen to the soil.

But what about bat poop? Also known as guano, bat poop has been said to work as a plant fertilizer because it’s rich in nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, and other nutrients. Unfortunately, using bat poop as a plant fertilizer can also be dangerous. So if you don’t really know what you are doing, bat poop as a fertilizer can be extremely risky.

Bat Poop Fertilizer Kills 2 NY Men

On December 2024, news of two men hailing from Rochester, New York, dying went viral.

The cause of death was dangerous fungus, in the bat poop that they were using to fertilize their marijuana plants. Both men grew their own marijuana plants for medical consumption, but unfortunately developed histoplasmosis after breathing toxic fungal spores from the guano.

One of the men was aged 59 years old; he bought bat poop online to use as fertilizer for his plants. Meanwhile, the other was a 64-year-old male who found guano in his attic, then decided to use it to fertilize his cannabis plants. They both developed similar symptoms, including chronic coughs, fever, severe weight loss, and respiratory failure. The case was also discussed in the Open Forum Infectious Diseases medical journal.

Is there a safe way to use bat poop as fertilizer? If you ask me, I truly can’t understand why one would use guano as fertilizer when there are so many other proven safe alternatives out there that are simply not as risky. According to the University of Washington, one must always wear a dust mask each time you open a bag containing soil amendments. That’s because a mask will greatly decrease the chances of breathing in fungal spores, which could be potentially dangerous. They also go on to explain that yes, guano is indeed used as fertilizer for its valuable nitrogen content but it still isn’t without its own risks, particularly of developing Histoplasma – the same condition that killed the two men.

Make Your Own Safe Fertilizers At Home

There are many other safe, affordable – and even free – fertilizers you can feed your marijuana plants with. It doesn’t have to cost a fortune nor does it have to be risky to your health.

Check out these easy, low-cost, DIY fertilizers for weed:

 

  • Coffee grounds are abundant in nitrogen, which makes it perfect for the vegetative stage of marijuana plants. They are also a fantastic source of organic materials and green waste, which contain other vital nutrients. When the coffee grounds decompose, they create soil aggregates that improve soil aeration and its water retention capabilities.

 

Mix around 2 grams of coffee ground for every liter of soil. Measuring its pH levels is also helpful, since you want it to be between 6 to 6.5

 

  • Crushed eggshells are a great way to ensure no eggshells go to waste. It’s rich in calcium plus other minerals that are effective in improving overall plant structure, health, and growth. In fact, so many gardeners and farmers commonly use crushed eggshells to help boost plant growth – and it will work just as well for marijuana plants.

 

They’re really easy to use, too! Just mix eggshells into the soil, or steep them into water then pour into the soil for a calcium-packed feed.

 

  • Banana tea or water is rich in potassium and magnesium, making it perfect as a feed during the marijuana plant’s flowering stage. You can use banana peels differently: with 3 to 5 banana peels, soak it in water for 2 days. Then you can use the water on your plants, and even leave the banana peels as compost for your garden.

 

  • Wood ash from your fireplace or other sources is a great source of phosphorus and potassium. Simply sprinkle some wood ash over marijuana during the final flower phase. Just use 1 or 2 grams of ash for every liter of substrate. Be careful not to use too much wood ash, or it can make the soil too alkaline.

 

  • Animal manure, such as those from cows, rabbits, or horses, make excellent organic fertilizers. Just be sure that they’re composed properly so that you avoid introducing weed seeds, or pathogens.

 

These low-cost fertilizers are also natural and effective. There’s no reason for you to turn to bat poop as fertilizer, even if you’re in a bind.


Conclusion

Guano or bat poop is a poor choice of fertilizer if you don’t know what you are doing. It’s risky and potentially dangerous – just not worth it. Instead, fertilize your marijuana plants with these options mentioned.

 

BEST POOP FOR CANNABIS PLANTS, KEEP READING…

BEST POOP FOR CANNABIS PLANTS

WHAT IS THE BEST POOP FOR USING ON CANNABIS PLANTS?



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Getting THC Edibles in Your Edible Arrangement?

Published

on

By


edible arragements with hemp thc products

Edible Arrangements Leans into Intoxicating Hemp Products: A Strategic Expansion

 

Edible Arrangements, a brand renowned for its vibrant fruit bouquets and sweet treats, is embarking on a bold new venture into the hemp and THC-infused edibles market. Through its parent company, Edible Brands, the company has launched Edibles.com, an e-commerce platform offering a variety of hemp-based products such as THC-infused beverages, gummies, and snacks. This strategic move taps into the burgeoning demand for cannabis-related wellness products and reflects a deliberate expansion beyond traditional offerings.

 

Introduction to Edible Arrangements and Its New Venture

 

Edible Arrangements was founded in 1999 by Tariq Farid, who envisioned a unique way to gift fresh fruit arrangements that were both visually appealing and delicious. Over the years, the company has grown to become a global brand with hundreds of locations across the United States and internationally. However, the company’s latest initiative marks a significant departure from its traditional fruit-based offerings, signaling a broader strategic shift towards becoming a comprehensive food, health, and wellness company.

 

The New Venture: Edibles.com

 

Edibles.com debuted on March 20, 2025, starting operations in Texas with ambitious plans to expand rapidly across Southeastern states like Florida and Georgia. The platform is designed to cater to consumers aged 21 and older, providing low-dose THC products that comply with the 2018 Farm Bill, which legalized hemp containing less than 0.3% THC by dry weight. Select products will also be available for nationwide shipping where legally permitted, leveraging the company’s existing logistics infrastructure.

 

Product Lineup

 

The initial product lineup includes a range of THC-infused beverages, gummies, and snacks. These products are designed to appeal to both seasoned cannabis users and newcomers looking for low-dose, accessible options. The company emphasizes the importance of quality and safety, ensuring that all products undergo rigorous testing to meet high standards of purity and potency.

 

Strategic Alignment and Market Potential

 

The move into the infused edibles market aligns with Edible Brands’ vision of becoming a broader food, health, and wellness company. CEO Somia Farid Silber highlighted that the infused edibles market is a fast-growing sector with high consumer demand for safe and reliable products. The company is leveraging its extensive franchise network to deliver these items while planning to open brick-and-mortar stores under the Incredible Edibles brand.

 

Market Trends and Consumer Demand

 

The cannabis industry, particularly the segment focused on hemp and THC-infused products, has seen exponential growth in recent years. This growth is driven by increasing consumer interest in wellness and recreational products, as well as evolving legal landscapes that have opened up new markets. Edible Arrangements is positioning itself to capitalize on this trend by offering products that cater to both health-conscious consumers and those seeking unique gifting options.

 

Challenges and Opportunities

 

While this expansion offers significant growth potential, it also comes with challenges such as navigating varying state regulations and ensuring product safety and quality. The company aims to address these issues through robust infrastructure and consumer advocacy. Thomas Winstanley, a cannabis industry veteran leading Edibles.com, emphasized the company’s unique position to drive innovation in this emerging market.

 

Regulatory Challenges

 

One of the primary challenges facing Edible Arrangements is the complex regulatory environment surrounding cannabis products. Laws regarding the sale and distribution of THC-infused products vary significantly from state to state, requiring the company to adapt its operations to comply with local regulations. This includes ensuring that products meet specific THC content limits and are marketed responsibly.

 

Quality Control and Safety

 

Another critical challenge is maintaining high standards of quality and safety across all products. Edible Arrangements is investing heavily in testing and quality assurance processes to ensure that all products meet stringent safety standards. This includes partnering with reputable suppliers and implementing rigorous testing protocols to verify the potency and purity of all THC-infused items.

 

Consumer Education and Advocacy

 

As part of its strategy, Edible Arrangements is also focusing on consumer education and advocacy. The company recognizes that many consumers are new to cannabis products and may have questions about usage, dosage, and safety. To address this, Edibles.com will provide comprehensive product information, dosage guidelines, and resources for consumers to learn more about the benefits and risks associated with THC-infused products.

 

Marketing Strategy

 

Edible Arrangements plans to leverage its existing brand recognition and customer loyalty to promote its new line of hemp-based products. The company will utilize social media, email marketing, and targeted advertising to reach its target audience. Additionally, partnerships with influencers and cannabis industry experts will help build credibility and drive awareness about the brand’s entry into this new market.

 

Future Expansion Plans

 

In the coming months, Edible Arrangements plans to expand its operations beyond Texas, targeting key markets in the Southeast. The company is also exploring opportunities to open physical stores under the Incredible Edibles brand, which will offer a curated selection of THC-infused products alongside traditional Edible Arrangements items.

 

Incredible Edibles Stores

 

The Incredible Edibles stores will serve as a unique retail experience, combining the company’s traditional fruit arrangements with its new line of hemp-based products. This format will allow customers to explore and purchase THC-infused items in a welcoming and educational environment. The stores will also host workshops and events focused on cannabis education and wellness, further enhancing the brand’s position as a leader in this emerging market.

 

Conclusion

Edible Arrangements’ foray into the hemp and THC-infused edibles market marks a significant strategic shift for the company. By leveraging its brand recognition and logistical capabilities, Edible Arrangements is poised to become a major player in this rapidly growing sector. While challenges exist, the company’s commitment to quality, safety, and consumer education positions it well for success in this new venture.

As the cannabis industry continues to evolve, Edible Arrangements’ entry into this market underscores the broader trend of mainstream brands embracing cannabis-related products. This move not only expands the company’s offerings but also reflects a broader cultural shift towards greater acceptance and normalization of cannabis use.

 

HEMP-DERIVED THC DELIVERIES ARE HERE, READ ON…

DOOR DASH DELIVERS WEED

DOOR DASH JUMPS IN TO THE HEMP-DERIVED THC GAME!



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media