Connect with us

breaking news

Legalize Cannabis NSW In Hot Water After Discovery They’d Sourced Volunteers Via Centrelink

Published

on


After the great vote over the weekend in NSW it is somewhat worrying the party didn’t have internal checks before accessing volunteers in this manner.

This suggests to us that there needs to be some better rules written for the party, better management of party business and systems for candidates and party members to adhere to otherwise we have all wasted our vote.

The ABC has dug deep and it isn’t encouraging

Organisations wanting to use job seekers chasing mutual obligations points as volunteers will find it tougher to be approved, after the government agency responsible for Centrelink admitted to mistakenly allowing a political party onto a list of accepted bodies.

The ABC can reveal Legalise Cannabis NSW, which is on track to win a seat in the NSW parliament after last weekend’s election, was allowed to sign up to become an “approved voluntary work organisation” for the purposes of mutual obligations.

Following enquiries from the ABC, Services Australia confirmed the political party had now been removed from the list, an urgent investigation was underway and the approval process would be tightened.

Ahead of the state election, Legalise Cannabis NSW was promoting itself as a “Centrelink-approved voluntary organisation” on the Seek Volunteer website and on Facebook.

Questions from the ABC about the party’s approval were passed between government departments before finally being answered by Services Australia.

Legalise Cannabis NSW “should not have been approved” as a voluntary work organisation, a Services Australia spokesperson said, blaming “human error” for the mistake.

“We have taken immediate action to remove Legalise Cannabis NSW as an approved voluntary work organisation and have notified them,” the spokesperson said, adding the party was on the approval list for approximately three weeks.

“We are also strengthening the application and approval process going forward.”

The spokesperson said a “very small number” of job seekers ultimately ended up volunteering for points through the party.

Those volunteers would not be penalised while being moved to “alternative arrangements”, they added.

The ABC sent a list of questions to Legalise Cannabis NSW and attempted to further contact party officials multiple times — including its lead upper house candidate, Jeremy Buckingham, on Monday — but did not receive a response before publication.

Legalise Cannabis NSW was able to promote itself online as a “Centrelink-approved voluntary organisation”.(Screenshots)

Mr Buckingham acknowledged the situation when pressed during an ABC Radio Sydney interview on Wednesday morning, but denied having any extensive knowledge about what happened.

“I’m not across the details of how that occurred, who was responsible, all of that,” he said.

‘Absolutely no transparency’

Mutual obligations and programs like Work for the Dole have long been criticised by social services advocates.

They say the system allows organisations to benefit from the cheap labour of those living below the poverty line, while doing little to actually help them find real work.

The Legalise Cannabis NSW example has raised further concerns about the transparency and administration of mutual obligations.

Jess (whose last name has been withheld) was made redundant from her last job in insurance.

She has been receiving Centrelink parenting payments while looking for part-time work and raising her daughter as a single mum.

To keep receiving welfare support, the 37-year-old is required to apply for eight jobs per month and to prove she has not refused any reasonable opportunity.

“The jobs I’m applying for … I’m told often that my application will no longer progress because more than 100 other people applied for that same role,” she said.

Jess was sent the Legalise Cannabis NSW volunteer ad by a friend.

While she said she was intrigued by the ad, it also started “shooting up red flags”.

“I looked at it and thought, ‘That’s a weird thing to be offering … how did Centrelink sign off on a political party?’”

Jess said it was important to keep political bodies out of the mutual obligations system to avoid “muddying the waters”.

“It smells to me,” she said.

Antipoverty Centre spokesperson Kristin O’Connell said it was troubling that a political party had been approved.

“I think it is particularly insidious when political parties seem to be trying to manipulate people on the lowest incomes into working for them for free so that they can get power,” she said.

The ABC understands there is no publicly available list of approved voluntary work organisations.

Ms O’Connell said that raised questions about which other groups were on it.

“There is absolutely no transparency about [who is being approved],” Ms O’Connell said.

“If you are a person who wants to volunteer to get your points and you’re approaching an organisation that says it is approved … you’re having to trust that organisation [is] not lying about whether they are an approved host.

“So you put people at risk and provide no accountability for the public to understand and scrutinise what types of organisations are getting free labour from welfare recipients.”

Elise Klein, an associate professor at the Australian National University’s Crawford School of Public Policy, said it reflected the overall  “lack of care” built into the mutual obligations system.

“If you’re going to compel people to do these activities, it needs to be much more transparent, and include much more thoughtful thinking around the kinds of activities and the kinds of skills people are going to achieve [from those activities],” she said.

Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-03-29/mutual-obligations-centrelink-volunteer-organisations/102134262



Source link

Continue Reading

breaking news

Australian Broadcasting Corp Alleges Military Veterans Have Been Targeted By Medicinal Cannabis Companies Via Social Media & Offered Free “Product”

Published

on

By


Their Headline reads

Veterans targeted by medicinal cannabis businesses on social media spruiking free products and subscriptions.

In short:

Veterans are being targeted by social media ads offering access to “free” medicinal cannabis, funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA).

VeteranCann supplied medicinal cannabis to a man with a record of cannabis addiction, who ended up in “borderline psychosis” and kept sending it even after he told them he was addicted.

Another patient was bombarded with texts to book an appointment, as the DVA confirms it funded $35.99 million of medicinal cannabis in 2023/2024.

The Report

At 4:16am a Brisbane navy veteran is desperately messaging the company which prescribes and sends him medicinal cannabis.

“I am addicted to THC and I shouldn’t be using it. I feel like I am having a mental health crisis and breakdown,” he pleads, hoping to put an end to the shipments.

It had been a swift downward spiral for 35-year-old Bill*, after he was targeted with a Facebook advertisement by the company VeteranCann.

The ads offered free access to “natural therapies” and claimed it was “backed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA)”.

Despite his history of cannabis addiction being well-documented with the DVA, Bill was sent more than $1,700 worth of medicinal cannabis in less than a month after just one call with a VeteranCann doctor.

The 14 bottles — six containing the psychoactive ingredient tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) — were paid for by the DVA.

“That was when I thought, ‘wow, these guys … might be a bit dodgy here. I can’t believe they’re sending me it so quickly’,” he said.

Struggling with his mental health, chronic pain and life with a newborn baby, some days Bill would drink entire bottles of the oil — bottles which should have lasted almost a month.

Within weeks he was in a “borderline drug-induced psychosis”, had taken sick leave from work and told his wife, who was caring for their baby, he felt like a “zombie”.

Despite informing VeteranCann he was addicted, he received another two shipments of the drugs.

“What is wrong with this system? Why should addictive medication be sent three times to a drug-addicted veteran?” he said.

Veterans big business for medicinal cannabis telehealth companies

Veterans represent a lucrative market for medicinal cannabis companies.

The DVA fully funds medicinal cannabis for veterans with specific conditions when other treatments have failed, and where there is evidence of a clinical benefit.

In the 2023-2024 financial year, it spent $35.99 million to fund medicinal cannabis for 8,455 veterans.

A DVA spokesperson confirmed 6 per cent of applications to fund medicinal cannabis products for veterans were rejected.

The ABC has spoken to veterans accusing major industry players of exploitative behaviour, including questionable marketing tactics, late night texts, offers of “free” medicinal cannabis, and ads targeting them through veteran support groups.

A screenshot of messages between Bill and VeteranCann

Bill said he told VeteranCann he was addicted to THC. (Supplied)

Army veteran Sandra* started the process to access medicinal cannabis for chronic pain through VeteranCann this year.

She said she had a 20-minute consultation with a nurse before being prescribed cannabis oil containing THC by a doctor she never spoke to.

The Royal Australian College of Psychiatrists warns products which contain high potency THC — the ingredient which gives users a “high” — should be avoided due to the risk of psychosis and weak evidence of efficacy in most conditions.

The DVA requires a written application from a veteran’s specialist before approving funding for higher doses of THC, or for multiple cannabis products.

VeteranCann invites veterans to use its “in-house advocate program” to get chronic pain or injury officially accepted by the DVA, as well as access to “partnered pain specialists” to unlock fully-funded treatment — including higher dose THC.

Sandra’s regular GP, Dr Kerry Summerscales, is a veteran herself.

She specialises in treating other veterans, and was shocked to see some of the high strength products her patients had been prescribed by online telehealth companies.

“I was really quite horrified on a few levels,” Dr Summerscales said.

“It’s like going straight in. ‘Oh yeah, here’s your fentanyl patch. Oh yeah, we won’t bother trying the Panadol first’.”

VeteranCann booked appointments for both Bill and Sandra with a “pain specialist” doctor, to help get DVA funding for higher doses of THC.

When Sandra didn’t follow up, she started receiving texts from a man called Geoff from VeteranCann offering to help gain free access to medicinal cannabis including “oil, flower and gummy bears”.

“The texts were a bit weird, because they just kept coming,” Sandra, who also lives with PTSD and ADHD, said.

Dr Summerscales said she was stunned when she saw the messages.

“I saw it as downright badgering, especially when you look at the times, at 9 o’clock at night there were texts,” she said.

Text message reads Geoff from Veterancann here. I noticed you have previously reached out to us. I wanted to follow up...

A text message sent from Geoff to a customer asking if they would like another booking for medicinal cannabis “free for veterans”. (Supplied)

Eventually Sandra replied to Geoff, noting VeteranCann hadn’t consulted with her GP.

Geoff responded, “normally VeteranCann doctors don’t liaise with GPs”, before texting again to offer a follow-up call.

“Therein lies the issue,” Dr Summerscales said.

“(Veterans) do have chronic pain and some of them do have mental health issues and they are vulnerable in that way.

“If you’re not treating the patient holistically and you’re just prescribing the one medication in a five-minute consult, that’s not medicine. And that is what needs to be clamped down on.”

In a statement, VeteranCann told the ABC Geoff was a “trained and experienced veteran advocate” paid for “onboarding veterans”, but apologised for the messages which it said “should not have been sent”.

Geoff’s number was also featured in online veteran support groups, advertising VeteranCann including several run by registered charity Young Veterans

Read more including this

VeteranCann consultant terminated after misogynistic posts

VeteranCann is owned by Dispensed, a telehealth company under fire after patients with a history of psychosis were prescribed medicinal cannabis by the company. One was hospitalised and the other took his own life.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-11-11/veterans-targeted-medicinal-cannabis-businesses-veterancann/104563180



Source link

Continue Reading

breaking news

News story : UK Gov. – Hemp licence burdens to be cut back to help grow UK economy

Published

on

By


Reforms to current hemp licence regulations are set to be introduced, making it easier for regulated farmers to grow the crop and maximise its economic potential.

“Hemp” is a variety of cannabis with “low-THC” levels, which is currently defined as a maximum of 0.2%.

The plant is grown for strictly lawful purposes, such as for use in the construction and textiles industries, and only farmers with a licence are allowed to plant it.

The government has agreed to several reforms, developed in collaboration with experienced growers, to the licensing system which will help boost the industry.

Under the changes, licence holders will now be able to grow hemp anywhere on a licensed farm, reducing the unnecessary burden on farmers who currently have to set out the exact field where they will grow the plants within a farm. This change is expected to come into effect for the 2025 growing season.

Ahead of the 2026 growing season, two further changes to the regulations are planned. The first will see an extension of the maximum period for a licence from 3 to 6 years, subject to compliance with the licence terms.

The second change will allow those applying for a licence to defer its start date by up to one year, helping farmers to make business planning easier.

Minister for Crime and Policing, Dame Diana Johnson said:

These reforms will bring an important boost to this industry and cut down the unnecessary burdens that have been placed on businesses.

This government will always listen and engage with industry experts, and we want to make it easier for licence holders to capitalise on the economic potential of legally growing hemp.

Minister for Food Security and Rural Affairs, Daniel Zeichner said:

These improvements to the licensing regime for industrial hemp are a positive step for farmers.

Recognising that industrial hemp is a field-grown agricultural crop, these reforms will simplify the license application process and provide greater flexibility within the crop rotation, enabling farmers to fully realise the economic and environmental benefits of the crop.

The government recognises cannabis is a harmful substance and expects police to take action against its misuse and supply. As a Class B substance, being caught possessing cannabis carries a maximum sentence of 5 years in prison, a fine or both.

Supplying the drug is also a serious criminal offence and carries a maximum sentence of up to 14 years in prison, an unlimited fine or both.



Source link

Continue Reading

breaking news

NY bans sale of caffeine-infused cannabis – The New York Office of Cannabis Management issued a stop order to Hudson Cannabis

Published

on

By


1906 sells two different “drops,” or pills, with low doses of THC and higher amounts of caffeine marketed as “Go” and “Genius” in small cylinder containers.

The firm’s “Go” drops contain 80 milligrams of caffeine and 2 mgs of THC-extract and 5 mgs of cannabidiol [CBD]/ weed extract and other plant-based or herbal ingredients. Go is marketed as an energy stimulant.

Its Genius pills contain 20 mgs of caffeine mixed with 2.5 mgs of TCH and 5 mgs combined of CBD and Cannabigerol (CBG), also found in the marijuana plant, and other herbal or plant extracts. It’s touted as a “brain power” supplement to boost focus and memory and calmness.

The 1906 cannabis pills have been marketed in New York since February of last year.

But OCM regulators issued a “quarantine,” or stop order, for the 1906 tablet July 24 after inspecting the 1906 combined cannabis-caffeine mix products at the Hudson Cannabis facility.

“Evidence supports that ingredients used in product are not allowed to be used in cannabis products,” said the quarantine order signed by inspectors Natalie DeLong and Matthew Hinken.

The order said the mixed ingredients “may jeopardize public health or safety.”

The company marketing 1906, which has been sold in seven states including New York, is appealing the ruling banning the sale of $1 million of its inventory in New York.

“Hudson Cannabis and our production facilities fully follow New York State’s cannabis regulations,” said Melany Dobson, co-founder of Hudson Cannabis, in a statement to The Post on Sunday.

“We are surprised by this decision from the State to quarantine products that have been on the market for over 18 months, are sold legally in States across the nation, and as far as we know have had zero reported adverse effects.

“This type of arbitrary and capricious behavior, preventing the sale of safe and tested products readily available across the country, only serves to benefit the illicit market Governor Hochul claims to care about shutting down,” Dobson said.

A lawyer for 1906’s parent firm Nuka Enterprises, Matthew Schweber, said OCM cited what he described as a wacky decaffeination rule that forbids infusing pure caffeine into cannabis products but allows “naturally occurring caffeine.”

The rule states,  “A processor is prohibited from processing any products which… contain any non-phytocannabinoid ingredient that would increase potency, toxicity, or addictive potential, or that would create an unsafe combination, known or unknown, with other psychoactive substances. This prohibition shall not apply to products containing naturally occurring caffeine, such as coffee, tea, or chocolate.”

OCM claims that caffeine increases “potency, toxicity, or addictive potential or… create(s) an unsafe combination [with cannabinoids],” Schweber said.

“But OCM can’t say which prohibition exactly caffeine triggers? Does caffeine increase cannabis’ ‘potency?’ Does it increase its ‘toxicity’ or its ‘addictive potential?’  Does it create ‘an unsafe combination?’ ” Schweber said.

“They can’t say. Do they have documented evidence of any of the dangers of combining caffeine and cannabis? No, of course not,” the lawyer said.

Schweber said the “crazy” part is that state regulators don’t explain why “naturally occurring caffeine” is OK but added caffeine is not.

Read more https://nypost.com/2024/10/27/us-news/ny-bans-sale-of-caffeine-infused-cannabis/



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media