Connect with us

Featured

Which World Leaders have Consumed Recreational Drugs?

Published

on


Whilst many politicians present themselves as god-like, innocent figures, that are above any use of substances or wrong-doing, the reality is actually from that. Drug use is a controversial issue that affects people from all walks of life, including politicians. While some politicians are open about their drug use, others choose to hide their habits from the public eye.

It’s becoming more and more common now for important figures to be honest about their pasts, although some still think it better to keep that part of themselves hidden, in case of it deterring voters. In addition, some politicians are simply so out-of-touch that they genuinely have never even heard of recreational drugs. In this article, we will explore the reasons why world leaders may or may not hide their use of drugs, and give some examples of those that have been found to have dabbled in the world of recreational substances. Let’s go. 

Drugs & Politics

Throughout history, many famous politicians have been known to experiment with recreational drugs. They are human after all, despite many of their attempts to look like something other than that. With around 5.5% of the population having tried recreational substances, it is highly likely that many politicians will have also dabbled. In addition, when it comes to wealthy circles, there’s never an abundance of high class cocaine lying around. LBC writes:

“Drugs are so commonplace in Westminster that MPs have been known to snort cocaine from their desks.”

Drug use happens every day, and every single person is sure to know someone who has taken substances – if they haven’t themselves. Thus, it isn’t surprising or controversial to consider that world leaders have also taken them. But every politician who has taken recreational drugs has a choice. Be honest about their substance use, hope that this makes them more down to earth, but risk being seen as too hippie. Or, alternatively, keep it a secret, hope that this makes them look respectable, but risk being seen as out of touch. Let’s see which method is better.

Why Lie?

Fear of Public Backlash

One of the main reasons why politicians may choose to hide their drug habits is the fear of public backlash. Drug use remains a stigmatised and controversial topic, and politicians who are open about their drug use may face criticism and scrutiny from the media and the public. This can damage their reputation and make it difficult for them to be taken seriously as leaders. They may be seen as unfit for office by some members of the public.

Fear of Legal Consequences

Drug use is often illegal, and politicians who are caught using drugs can face legal consequences, including fines, jail time, and the loss of their political careers. This can be particularly damaging for politicians who are in high-profile positions, as they may face greater scrutiny and harsher punishments. 


Thank you for stopping in. Head over to the Cannadelics Weekly Newsletter for direct updates; and get access to awesome deals on cannabis buds, vapes, edibles, smoking devices and equipment, cannabinoid compounds, and some psychedelic products! Go get high responsibly!


Why be Honest?

Transparent Leader

Some politicians choose to be open about their drug use in order to be transparent with the public. They believe that honesty is the best policy, and that being open about their drug use can help to build trust with their constituents. This can be particularly important for politicians who are advocating for drug policy reform, as they may feel that they have a personal responsibility to be open about their own drug use. It also brings the individual down to earth, highlighting that they understand what it is like to live a normal life – with joys and temptations. 

Reduce Stigma

Drug use remains a stigmatized and controversial topic, and some politicians choose to be open about their drug use in order to reduce the stigma surrounding it. They believe that being open can help to show that recreational drugs are a complex and nuanced issue that affects people from all walks of life. This is especially helpful if world leaders believe that the current drug laws are outdated and ineffective, and that a more compassionate and evidence-based approach to drug policy is needed. 

World Leaders 

Of course, for many politicians, their personal life can be published without their intent. In this case, it doesn’t matter which method they want to use, because the news is already out there. We’re going to take a look at some of the most popular nation leaders who have been found to consume recreational drugs. 

Barack Obama

Barack Obama, the 44th President of the United States, has admitted to using cocaine and marijuana in his youth. In his memoir, “Dreams From My Father,” Obama wrote about his experiences experimenting with drugs as a young man, including his use of cocaine in high school and college. The New York Times writes:

“He indulged in marijuana, alcohol and sometimes cocaine as a high school student in Hawaii, according to the book. He made “some bad decisions” as a teenager involving drugs and drinking, Senator Obama, now a presidential candidate, told high school students in New Hampshire last November… Mr. Obama’s admissions are rare for a politician”

While Obama has been candid about his past drug use, he has also been a vocal advocate for drug policy reform and had worked to decriminalize marijuana during his presidency. The USA is now one of the world leaders for cannabis drug reform. 

Bill Clinton

Another former U.S. President, Bill Clinton, has also been open about his past drug use. In a 1992 interview, Clinton admitted to having smoked cannabis. Time writes:

“I’ve never broken a state law… But when I was in England I experimented with marijuana a time or two, and I didn’t like it. I didn’t inhale it, and never tried it again.”

Clinton’s drug use was a source of controversy throughout his political career, with critics accusing him of hypocrisy for advocating for tough drug policies while admitting to having used drugs himself. However, his admission of marijuana use did not seem to significantly impact his political career, and he went on to serve two terms as President of the United States. The idea of taking a drag of a joint and not inhaling feels seriously low stakes. In fact, if this really is the only experience Clinton had with drugs, then it highlights his sheltered life, and also suggests he probably should not be making decisions based around drug laws due to his huge lack of experience. 

Boris Johnson

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has also been open about his past drug use, which reportedly included cannabis and cocaine. In a 2007 interview, Johnson admitted to having used cocaine while he was a journalist in the 1990s. However, he opened up in a very defensive manner. He said that cocaine…

“achieved no pharmacological, psychotropic or any other effect on me whatsoever”. Two years earlier, appearing on the BBC’s Have I Got News for You, Johnson had tried to divert the question with a joke, saying: “I think I was once given cocaine, but I sneezed and so it did not go up my nose. In fact, I may have been doing icing sugar.”

Again, Johnson – when in power – continued the usual status-quo of the hardline drug policy. The way in which he deflected the question of consuming cocaine highlights that his aim was to always keep that part of himself hidden from the public. For a Conservative politician who aims to continue the War on Drugs agenda, there is little benefit in opening up about personal substance use. However, maybe by admitting to it even slightly, it might win him some ‘relatable’ points. 

Justin Trudeau

Current Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been open about his past drug use, which mainly included cannabis consumption. In 2013, he admitted to having smoked marijuana as recently as three years prior, when he was a Member of Parliament. The BBC writes:

“One of our friends lit a joint and passed it around,” he said. “I had a puff.” He said he had used marijuana five or six times in his life but had never purchased the drug.”

In 2018, Canada became one of the first nations to legalise the recreational use of cannabis. This was a great deal thanks to Justin Trudeau. It seems his honesty around the use of weed was also a political decision. Normalising the act, made it easier for him to push for its legality. If people really believe that taking a puff of a mate’s joint that’s being passed around at a dinner party is a horrific act, then it’s hard to see how there’s ever going to be consensus in drug opinion. Nonetheless, Trudeau highlighted how it was possible for a world leader to use his own honesty to then push for legal change. 

Conclusion

There are many other world leaders who have been found to have taken drugs, and I imagine there’s a lot more than you may think. That’s not to say that Queen Elizbeth took recreational drugs, but, then again, who knows? What it really highlights is how many political figures hide their personal lives for fear of losing voters respect. It seems, on the whole, the image of a politician as a ‘perfect person’ is more popular than seeing them as an ‘actual person’. This is a shame, if it is the case. However, as time changes, and drug laws around the world shift, perhaps future world leaders will be heralded for being honest about their own drug use. 

Thanks for making your way over! We appreciate you stopping in at Cannadelics.com; where we work to bring you the best in independent news coverage for the cannabis and psychedelics spaces. Visit us regularly for daily news, and sign up to the Cannadelics Weekly Newsletter, so you’re always on top of what’s going on.



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis

White House Finally Comments On Marijuana Industry

Published

on

By


Part of the cannabis industry supported the new president, betting he was going to move and move quickly on cannabis – the White House finally commented.

The cannabis industry has been a boon for consumers, medical patients, veterans and legal states, but for the thousands of mom and pop businesses is has been a roller coaster.  With a huge demand, it would seem to be easy money, but the federal, tax, and banking restrictions have made it difficult to grow and expand. Part of the industry were all for the new administration assuming they would support positive change, but many in the new cabinet and the House Speaker Mike Johnson are foes.  Now the White House finally comments on marijuana industry…and it doesn’t show a clear path.

RELATED: Music Is A Turn On Like Sex And Marijuana

The administration’s current stance on marijuana reform is marked by inaction, despite campaign promises and earlier signals of support for cannabis-related reforms. A White House official recently confirmed that “no action is being considered at this time” regarding marijuana policy, leaving advocates and industry stakeholders uncertain about the administration’s priorities.

During his campaign, the resident expressed support for rescheduling marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which would move it from Schedule I to Schedule III, easing restrictions on medical use and enabling cannabis businesses to access banking and tax benefits. However, since taking office, no concrete steps have been taken to advance this initiative. A DEA hearing on rescheduling, initially planned for January 2025, was postponed due to procedural appeals and remains unscheduled.

The president has also voiced support for state autonomy in cannabis policy and endorsed state-level legalization initiatives, such as Florida’s failed 2024 ballot measure for recreational marijuana. While this reflects a more favorable stance compared to his first term, his administration has yet to prioritize federal reforms like the SAFE Banking Act, which would facilitate banking services for cannabis businesses. Efforts to include such measures in a government funding bill late last year were unsuccessful.

The delay in federal action has significant implications for the cannabis industry. Rescheduling marijuana could alleviate financial burdens by eliminating restrictions under IRS Code Section 280E and promoting medical research. However, the stalled process leaves businesses navigating regulatory uncertainties and limited financial access.

RELATED: The Science Behind Why Music Sounds So Much Better When You’re High

While stakeholders continue lobbying for reform, the administration appears focused on other priorities such as immigration and foreign policy. Advocates hope the President will leverage his influence to advance cannabis reform, but for now, the issue remains sidelined. Until then the industry struggles and waits.



Source link

Continue Reading

april fools

The History Behind April Fool’s Day

Published

on

By


Love it or hate it – April Fool’s Day is here to stay…and here is the history behind this unique tradition

From Britain to India, it is a popular day of pranks, laughs and silliness. From Google to Burger King has participated and some people spend endless hours planning the perfect joke.  But what is the history behind April Fool’s Day? It is celebrated annually on April 1, is a global tradition marked by pranks and jokes. Despite its widespread popularity, the origins of this playful holiday remain uncertain, with several theories tracing its roots to different historical events and cultural practices.

RELATED: Why Do Whales Keep Swallowing People

Both April Fools’ Day and Día de Los Inocentes mark days when people play practical jokes on one another. April Fools’ Day is primarily celebrated in English-speaking countries, while Día de Los Inocentes is more widely marked in Spanish-speaking countries. A key way Día de Los Inocentes differs from April Fools’ Day is it celebrated on December 28th every year 

Some of the most famous April Fool’s pranks include The Swiss Spaghetti Harvest, where the BBC broadcast a segment showing peasants harvesting spaghetti from trees in Switzerland. Another notable prank was when radio station KGB-FM in San Diego announced that the Space Shuttle was landing at a local airport, drawing over 1,000 people. Google has also been known for its annual April Fool’s jokes, such as the “Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol”. Additionally, brands like Pornhub have participated with humorous site name changes, such as “Cornhub” and “Hornhub”

One popular theory links April Fool’s Day to the adoption of the Gregorian calendar in 1582, initiated by Pope Gregory XIII. Before this change, many European countries followed the Julian calendar, where the new year began around late March or early April. Those who continued celebrating the old New Year date were mocked as “April fools,” giving rise to the holiday’s name and customs.

A Burger Kind April Fool's prank....

Another theory suggests that April Fool’s Day may have originated from ancient spring festivals such as Rome’s Hilaria or India’s Holi. Hilaria, celebrated in late March, involved games, disguises, and mockery of neighbors, while Holi featured playful pranks and joyous festivities marking the arrival of spring.

The first definitive reference to April Fool’s Day comes from a 1561 Flemish poem by Eduard de Dene. In this humorous tale, a nobleman sends his servant on absurd errands for nonexistent items, a prank still known as a “fool’s errand.” This poem solidifies April Fool’s Day as an established tradition by the late Middle Ages.

In France, the day became known as poisson d’avril (“April fish”), where children would pin paper fish on unsuspecting friends’ backs. This tradition symbolizes gullibility, likening victims to young fish easily caught.

RELATED: Fun Life Lessons Learned From Spaghetti Westerns

By the 18th century, April Fool’s Day had spread across Europe and North America. In Scotland, it evolved into “Gowkie Day,” where people were sent on wild goose chases. The following day, “Tailie Day,” involved pranks like pinning “kick me” signs on others. Media outlets also began participating in the holiday by publishing fake headlines and stories—a tradition that continues today.

While the exact origin remains debated, April Fool’s Day thrives as an opportunity for lighthearted fun worldwide. Its enduring appeal lies in its ability to bring laughter and mischief into everyday life, transcending cultural boundaries and historical uncertainties.



Source link

Continue Reading

comfort food

Does Comfort Food Actually Help

Published

on

By


When sick or sad, people gravitate to comfort food – but does it make a difference?

Everyone gets down, stressed or just in a mood, and a number of people wants something to make them feel good. Comfort food is a go to indulgence which lifts the spirts. In North America, some top comfort foods include pot roast, lasagna, chocolate, ice cream and cookies….around the world it includes rice, yogurt, pizza, ramen, and boeuf bourguignon. It is an excuse to enjoy favorite flavors, but does comfort food actually help?

RELATED: Tips To Develop A Better Morning Routine

The answer is nuanced, as comfort foods can provide both emotional relief and potential drawbacks depending on the individual and circumstances. Comfort food has been shown to improve mood temporarily, especially for emotional eaters. Studies suggest that the palatability of food plays a significant role in mood enhancement, with tastier foods providing greater comfort during moments of sadness or stress. Emotional eaters often experience satisfaction and mood improvement after consuming comfort food, while non-emotional eaters may not derive the same benefit, particularly under stress. Additionally, comfort foods can evoke nostalgia and positive memories, acting as social surrogates that remind individuals of meaningful connections and moments of belonging.

vanilla flavor ice cream with chocolate syrup

From a physiological perspective, consuming sweet and fatty comfort foods can release dopamine and serotonin, chemicals linked to pleasure and mood elevation. This process can dampen stress responses in the body by reducing cortisol levels and activating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. However, these effects are often short-lived and may lead to unhealthy eating habits if relied upon excessively.

While comfort foods can provide immediate emotional relief, they may also contribute to negative health outcomes if consumed excessively. High-calorie comfort foods rich in sugar and fat are associated with weight gain, metabolic risks, and increased likelihood of depression over time. This creates a feedback loop where individuals turn to unhealthy food to combat stress but experience worsening mental health as a result.

RELATED: The Science Behind Why Music Sounds So Much Better When You’re High

Interestingly, studies show that healthy alternatives like fruits and vegetables can offer similar mood-boosting benefits without the health risks associated with traditional comfort foods. Incorporating omega-3 fatty acids or dark chocolate in moderation can also enhance mood while supporting overall health. Social aspects of eating—such as sharing meals with loved ones—can amplify the emotional benefits of food without overindulgence.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media