Connect with us

business

I’m Telling! Canada Tattle-Tale Cannabis Complaints

Published

on


The weed industry is not the pot of gold it was predicted to be. While plenty of money is made, it falls terribly short of predictions, and the industry is painfully competitive. Canada operations are certainly feeling the burn of competition, and this has led to a series of complaints by cannabis operators, who are calling each other out in tattle tale fashion, in a bid to get the upper hand.

Competition in Canada cannabis industry leads to tattle tale complaints

Sometimes a story is a little bit funny, but also at the same time, a depressing reminder of a difficult situation. This is the case with the current and developing story out of Canada concerning the competition within the industry; which has resulted in industry operators calling each other out with tattle tale complaints, as each tries to survive in this difficult landscape.

In this case, its not the regulated industry complaining about the black market competition; but legal operators making complaints about other legal operators. These complaints are to call out other companies for bad behavior of some kind, or to let authorities know about their concerns.

In 2022, according to MJBizDaily, there were 706 complaints filed from legal cannabis operators in Canada, about other legal operators. This information comes from Canada’s federal cannabis regulator. How much of an increase are we talking about? According to data from Health Canada, in 2021 there were 214 complaints from cannabis operators, and the year before that, only 182.

In Canada, cannabis operators file complaints about each other
In Canada, cannabis operators file complaints about each other

In Canada, filing a complaint is easy to do. Health Canada provides an online form for this purpose, and does invite those who see problems, to report them. The government agency did not give detailed information for the complaints that were made or their purpose, nor did it give information on the companies which filed them.

Why all these complaints?

When we’re little kids, the act of ‘telling’ on another is met with a certain amount of disdain. This doesn’t necessarily stop the truth-tellers from imparting their truth about others, to some overseeing body; but it does teach us early that this behavior is not desired, or welcomed by our peers. Other people don’t like being told on; and realistically, none of us like someone else sticking their nose in our business, either.

Yet, that’s exactly what’s going on here, and we’re not talking about little kids. Everyone in Canada’s cannabis industry has their nose in everyone else’s business, in an attempt to win out in an incredibly competitive market. So as companies cut corners, sometimes in mild ways; other companies are there to point a big old finger in their direction. Even if they’re experiencing similar problems.

David Hyde, the CEO of Toronto company Hyde Advisory & Investments, put it this way, via MJBizDaily “It’s become real difficult as more people enter the market. It’s become virtually impossible (to survive) for LPs that aren’t dialed in. Many of them have to do things like skirt advertising rules, skirting restrictions on sampling, paying off retailers – whatever it is, a lot of them realized they have to really push the boat out and take risks.”

He explains how this environment leads to snitching by competitors, who aren’t doing whatever it is that they’re specifically snitching about. He continued, “There’s much more bad-actor activity going on, and LPs are more prone to (snitch) on each other because it helps level the playing field. Right now, it’s desperate times.”

Canada cannabis issues

Canada was the first large market to open; apart from, Uruguay, which is entirely government run. As such, it provides a great way to track the industry in general. And all the problems that come up in today’s cannabis world, are relevant to Canada. This includes intense black-market competition, complaints of high prices, company restructuring and closures, companies getting kicked off stock exchanges, layoffs, and issues with tax collection.

Canada is sending out the taxman to collect unpaid marijuana taxes
Canada is sending out the taxman to collect unpaid marijuana taxes

The latter is such an intense issue, that the Canadian government started sending out tax collectors to collect the excise taxes that companies haven’t paid. Excise taxes are paid between operators in a supply chain, and the cost of the tax is absorbed into the price of the product. The customer pays it with the product price, but the actual tax is paid to the government, by whoever collects it. They usually get implemented between producers and suppliers.

The reality of the cannabis industry is that these are sin taxes; which means they’re very high taxes that are technically meant to dissuade use of what is considered a dangerous product, by the government. Of course, we know things don’t work like that, so what they actually are, is a way for governments to bring in more money, under the guise that cannabis is dangerous. It’s quite a contradiction considering how many people call cannabis a medicine, and the general lack of problems associated with it.

Considering all the issues mentioned above, there are many companies that haven’t paid their taxes; because they can’t. According to cannabis consulting firm Whitney Economics, only 24.4% of cannabis businesses reported making a profit in 2022, down from 42% in 2021. After all, if a company can barely survive, its probably not as likely to pay its taxes. That the Canadian government had to announce going after non-paying operators, is a good indication that something is not working out in this system.

How do deal with this?

This is a great question, and applies to more than Canada. As a similar example of governments seemingly not caring about reality; recently, Missouri passed a law to outlaw THCA in products if it comes from outside Missouri. The problem? It seems the ban was likely made because Missouri didn’t want to account for lower pricing in neighboring states. It’s tactic is to keep prices high, and consider it a crime to bring over/use products of another state, even if they’re regulated in that state. And even if they come from federally approved hemp, which is federally allowed to cross state lines. Its already being challenged.

This is the same backwards logic used throughout the industry. This weird idea that governments can keep prices high, and people will pay them without a thought; whether this applies to industry operators, or buyers. Yet we know this isn’t true, or there wouldn’t be constant talk of an impossible to beat black market. A market that exists in its current size, because there’s so much room to undercut the legal market; what with the legal market’s regulatory costs and sin taxes that keep prices high.

Since the black market can keep up with every new product and innovation of the legal market, and change prices immediately if necessary; this means a comparable products market for buyers, at lower prices. In fact, it’s often hard for a buyer to know when they’re in a legal vs illegal dispensary. Illicit shops don’t advertise their black market nature; so much of the time, purchasers assume that if its there and open, it must be legal. As long as the legal industry is set up to add on on these extra costs, it’ll always have issues keeping up with the black market.

Canada announced it wanted to restructure its industry
Canada announced it wanted to restructure its industry

All of this is to say that problems abound in this industry. As far as Canada, on March 25th of this year, Canada posted a notice of intent to restructure the current cannabis system, in order to make it more palatable for companies having major issues. And while the country did address expensive regulatory measures, it didn’t so much as bring up taxes once. And it doesn’t seem like anything was figured out yet.

As of yet, there have been no news stories of sweeping changes in regulation, or anything major to relieve the pressure. All updates thus far can be found here; but none seem directly related to the issues brought up in the notice of intent. Perhaps those issues require further consideration. Though it seems Canada has been skirting important issues in keeping its industry afloat; it did put out information recently pertaining to a possible amendment, which would restrict certain flavors for inhaled cannabis products.

Conclusion

Apparently every cannabis operator in Canada is like that kid in kindergarten that had to complain to the teacher every time you got out of line, or held a toy for five seconds too long. And let’s be honest about it, no one really liked that kid. Canada’s overly strict system seems to be resulting in a tattle tale industry of operators, all trying not to be the one to sink.

Welcome everyone. Thanks for joining in at Cannadelics.com; where we report on the most interesting stories in the cannabis and hallucinogen spectra. Visit us frequently to access updates; and get yourself signed up to the Cannadelics Weekly Newsletter; to ensure you’re always first to get the story.



Source link

Continue Reading

business

Marijuana rescheduling leaves regulators and sellers cautiously optimistic

Published

on

By



A move by the Biden Administration to change how marijuana is treated by federal authorities was met with cautious approval by Massachusetts state regulators, cannabis sellers, and national marijuana advocates alike.

The Drug Enforcement Agency will drop marijuana from the list of banned substances found under Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, where it currently sits alongside heroin and LSD. It will instead move it to Schedule III, among the likes of Tylenol with codeine and anabolic steroids. This follows the recommendation of the Department of Health and Human Services

“Rescheduling cannabis is a monumental step forward for the federal government, one that can open new avenues to research, medical use, and banking for the regulated industries states like Massachusetts have built across the country,” said Ava Callender Concepcion, the acting chair of the Bay State’s Cannabis Control Commission.

Read the rest of this story on BostonHerald.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

business

Thailand Considers Relisting Cannabis as a Narcotic

Published

on

By


The Thai government is contemplating the relisting of cannabis as a narcotic due to concerns over its recreational use and potential societal harms. This reconsideration comes after cannabis was decriminalized in June 2022, which led to a surge in its availability and use.

Cannabis Conundrum: Thailand Reconsiders Legal Status Amidst Rising Concerns

The recent decriminalization of cannabis in Thailand has ignited a complex debate over its legal status and societal impact. While the policy aimed to boost the medical marijuana industry and provide economic opportunities, the unintended rise in recreational use has sparked discussions about a potential reclassification.

Public Health Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, a key advocate for the decriminalization, emphasized that the policy was intended to promote medical use, not recreational. However, the current legal framework lacks clear regulations governing recreational use, leading to widespread availability and potential misuse.

The Bhumjaithai Party, led by Anutin, initially pushed for the delisting of cannabis to benefit the medical industry and provide economic opportunities for Thai citizens. However, the subsequent surge in recreational use, particularly among youths, has raised concerns about potential health and social consequences.

Opposition parties have criticized the government for inadequate regulations and are advocating for cannabis to be relisted as a narcotic under the Narcotics Act. They argue that the current situation exposes young people to potential harm and lacks sufficient safeguards.

A recent poll revealed that a majority of Thais support stricter regulations on cannabis use. Concerns have been raised about the potential impact on public health, particularly regarding mental health issues and addiction, especially among youths. Additionally, there are worries about the potential for increased crime and social disorder.

The government now faces the challenge of balancing the economic benefits of a burgeoning cannabis industry with the need to protect public health and safety. Finding a solution that addresses the concerns of both advocates and critics will be crucial in determining the future of cannabis in Thailand

Why It Matters

Thailand’s shift in cannabis policy has garnered international attention, serving as a case study for the complexities of drug policy reform. The potential reclassification of cannabis underscores the challenges of balancing economic opportunities with public health and safety considerations. The outcome of this debate will have significant implications for Thailand’s legal landscape, public health policies, and the future of its cannabis industry.

Potential Implications of Relisting Cannabis as a Narcotic

If cannabis is relisted as a narcotic, it could lead to stricter regulations on its cultivation, distribution, and use. This may impact the growth of the medical marijuana industry and limit access for patients who rely on cannabis for therapeutic purposes. Additionally, it could result in increased criminal penalties for possession and use, potentially leading to a rise in incarceration rates.

Alternatively, if the government opts to maintain the decriminalized status, it will need to implement robust regulations and public health campaigns to mitigate the risks associated with recreational use. This includes age restrictions, educational initiatives, and support systems for individuals struggling with cannabis dependence.

The Bigger Picture

The debate surrounding cannabis legalization and regulation is a global phenomenon, with countries around the world grappling with similar challenges. The Thai government’s decision regarding cannabis will likely be influenced by international trends and best practices in drug policy reform. It is crucial to consider the experiences of other nations that have legalized or decriminalized cannabis, examining both the successes and challenges they have encountered.

Source: Thai PBS World



Source link

Continue Reading

banking

“A big deal”: What the feds’ move to reclassify marijuana means for Colorado cannabis

Published

on

By



Cannabis advocates in Colorado cheered the Biden Administration’s reported move to reclassify marijuana and said the decision likely would reduce businesses’ tax burden significantly.

Industry leaders cautioned that such a move — if finalized — would not resolve some major challenges facing the industry, such as limited access to banking. But they pointed to the symbolic importance of preparations by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration to downgrade the substance’s drug classification.

A man pours cannabis into rolling papers as he prepares to roll a joint the Mile High 420 Festival in Civic Center Park in Denver, April 20, 2024. (Photo by Kevin Mohatt/Special to The Denver Post)

Read the rest of this story on DenverPost.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media