Connect with us

business

Michigan Lawmakers Want to Work With Tribal Dispensaries

Published

on


Two new laws passed in Michigan that will allow legal cannabis businesses in the state, to work with Indian tribal dispensaries. They are awaiting the governor’s signature.

New Michigan laws to work with tribal dispensaries

Last week, Michigan’s House of Representatives passed two bills. The two bills, SB 180 and SB 179, passed through the Senate earlier in June. The meat of the story is around SB 180; although the two bills work together, and neither can go into effect, without the other. This makes them two parts of the same general law.

These new laws, should they get signed off on, would make it legal for approved operators in Michigan to make deals with Indian tribal dispensaries. Without the bill, the two function as separate entities due to Native American sovereignty. Though it certainly hasn’t always been respected, the US does afford Native American populations a certain amount of sovereignty due to the extensive century-long slaughter that occurred when European settlers colonized the Americas.

In Michigan, the legal cannabis trade is governed by the CRA – Cannabis Regulatory Authority. SB 180 would allow this agency to legally deal with the tribal dispensaries in terms of regulatory issues; as well as to allow the transport of cannabis products, to and from tribal locations. The second part, SB 179, would allow some of the collected tax money from cannabis, to go back to the tribes based on sales. This last line is important, because it involves a very big catch.

Michigan wants tribal dispensaries to institute sin tax
Michigan wants tribal dispensaries to institute sin tax

Michigan has a high 10% excise sin tax on legal cannabis products, which is imposed under the idea that cannabis is dangerous; and which immediately makes for high and unnecessary tax rates on all cannabis products. This tax is added on despite other more standard taxes, like sales tax; even though it takes away the ability to be competitive with lower-priced black markets. Under SB 180, if a tribe enters into an agreement with the CRA, its then required to also charge and collect at least 10% tax. As in, Michigan is telling the tribes they would have to charge more money for products.

This bill is seemingly designed to encourage the tribes to raise their prices. Of course, this would make them less competitive with both legal markets, and black markets; with no obvious upside for the tribes. The tribes don’t need help from the state of Michigan to sell their products, which makes it questionable why any would sign a deal with the CRA. It’s desirable for Michigan, on the other hand; because it would level the playing fields, and require higher pricing for Native American establishments. This would make them less competitive with state dispensaries.

Will it matter if the governor signs the laws or not? It’s hard to imagine this working, but then, people are certainly corruptible. Even with the ability for corruption, though, the entire reason the current model (without such a law) is so useful for tribes, is because it allows for a high level of competition. If any tribe makes a deal with the CRA, it’ll throw away its ability for this. It looks like a hail Mary move by Michigan to attempt to stop a tribal market, that it already knows it can’t compete with.

Native Americans and weed

Native American sovereignty is seen with Indian casinos; which were the first way the Native American population began using its separateness to its advantage. And it worked. But times changed; and the introduction of online casinos has cut into the sales of brick and mortar locations, rendering many obsolete. As a result of this shift, tribes have recently picked up on their ability to enter the cannabis industry; without the heavy regulatory laws and taxes of the legal US markets.

This, like gambling, was not an immediate win. Despite the US talking out of one side of its mouth about Native American sovereignty since the signing of the constitution; it isn’t really upheld universally. In fact, casinos stand as an example both of this sovereignty, as well as the push-back to it. Native American tribes, despite this supposed sovereignty, must share profits with states, and submit to regulation under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act; which indicates a lack of total sovereignty in the end.

When it comes to cannabis, US governments can still get in the way of tribal businesses; but its very much frowned on. In 2013, the Cole Memo, along with growing attention on the situation; more solidified the idea publicly that US governments shouldn’t tell Indian populations what they can do, without consultation. Although it also does not take away the federal government’s ability to intervene. This was repealed in 2018, but there is strong hesitance by US governments to go after tribes. Likely because it looks really bad; and because the constitution technically protects their rights of sovereignty.

Tribes can legalize cannabis using their sovereignty
Tribes can legalize cannabis using their sovereignty

In the last few years, more and more tribal dispensaries have opened in different states. Tribes can quickly legalize and update laws, which is a huge advantage over the slow-moving governmental systems of America. Therefore, they can institute and change pricing schemes overnight, and remain competitive with any other cannabis market. They are also not beholden to the expensive regulatory measures that US governments continue to institute; despite this leading to producers going broke, and not enough dispensaries to sell products.

Beyond this, Native American tribes don’t need to include unnecessary taxes like sin taxes; which drive up prices even more, and put a huge burden on producers. Without these extra costs, or slow systems; a tribe can legalize overnight, have a business up and running in days or weeks, and can adapt it quickly to changing conditions. Best part of all, because of the extreme abuse of these populations historically, and the growing awareness and disapproval of this; federal and state governments have a hard time complaining; or using the same fear-tactic lines against them, that they use against black markets.

Where else we see this happen

Though several tribal operations opened within the last few years, the last several months has seen an explosion in the general story; and a pick-up in the rate at which the tribes are entering the business. This has spurred different moves by different states. It should be remembered every state is currently having issues reigning in black markets, dealing with overproduction, and opening enough dispensaries; which are all issues related to poorly constructed regulation.

Stories out of Minnesota show a possibility of states and tribes working together; which exemplifies the lack of state power. This was evidenced when the Chippewa’s White Earth reservation legalized cannabis in August, and then nearly immediately opened dispensaries. A tobacco store on the reservation called Asema Tobacco and Pipe, advertised on social media it would sell weed; though it was not authorized by tribal law to do so.

The act was met by a raid performed by tribal police and state police in conjunction. What exactly this means, is hard to say. But it does show Minnesota law enforcement had to play ball with tribal rights, and could not act on its own; or at the very least, didn’t want the public scrutiny of attempting to do so. It could not tear anything down, or make arrests, or show any violence. This is a new concept. In the past, this could have led to massive bloodshed.

In New York, a more direct move was made, that shows the state is grappling with the issue of competition. Last month, about a third of New York’s total legislature signed an open letter to the governor, to support a bill entitled the Cannabis Crop Rescue Act. This is actually two companion bills; one from the Senate and one from the Assembly. They would allow legal New York producers to sell their product to tribal dispensaries.

Michigan law would allow state to transport cannabis to tribal dispensaries
Michigan law would allow state to transport cannabis to tribal dispensaries

Much like with Michigan, there is a logical discrepancy, however. Michigan’s law would require tribal dispensaries to limit their competitiveness by raising prices. The New York law depends on tribal dispensaries willing to pay for US-grown weed. While the implication is that the tribes would pay a break-even amount; they can logically grow weed way more inexpensively, which makes this a pretty bad deal.

It’s hard to know if there’s pressure put on tribes to submit to deals. The reality is that US governments have never been fair to them in the past; and public scrutiny might be the impetus for backhanded moves. My thought is that any tribe that makes a deal with a US government, that specifically limits its own business; is likely doing so out of some kind of pressure, or a deal meant for personal gain over tribal gain. As of right now, however, its difficult to know if the tribes will play ball; or if states like New York and Michigan, are simply flailing around, and hoping for a good response.

Conclusion

Indian tribal dispensaries are quickly showing an ability to rise to the top of legal weed markets, and Michigan is a great example. It’s hard to say how this will affect current legal and black markets going forward; but it makes for one of the most interesting stories to follow in today’s world of weed. Plus, the biggest positive of all, is that tribal dispensaries give buyers a new way to buy legal weed products, and to do so at generally lower prices.

Hey readers! You’ve arrived at Cannadelics.com; an independent publication geared toward covering the weed markets, and the drug world at large. Hang out with us regularly to keep up to date; and head over to the Cannadelics Weekly Newsletter; so you’re always on top of what’s going down.



Source link

Continue Reading

business

Marijuana rescheduling leaves regulators and sellers cautiously optimistic

Published

on

By



A move by the Biden Administration to change how marijuana is treated by federal authorities was met with cautious approval by Massachusetts state regulators, cannabis sellers, and national marijuana advocates alike.

The Drug Enforcement Agency will drop marijuana from the list of banned substances found under Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, where it currently sits alongside heroin and LSD. It will instead move it to Schedule III, among the likes of Tylenol with codeine and anabolic steroids. This follows the recommendation of the Department of Health and Human Services

“Rescheduling cannabis is a monumental step forward for the federal government, one that can open new avenues to research, medical use, and banking for the regulated industries states like Massachusetts have built across the country,” said Ava Callender Concepcion, the acting chair of the Bay State’s Cannabis Control Commission.

Read the rest of this story on BostonHerald.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

business

Thailand Considers Relisting Cannabis as a Narcotic

Published

on

By


The Thai government is contemplating the relisting of cannabis as a narcotic due to concerns over its recreational use and potential societal harms. This reconsideration comes after cannabis was decriminalized in June 2022, which led to a surge in its availability and use.

Cannabis Conundrum: Thailand Reconsiders Legal Status Amidst Rising Concerns

The recent decriminalization of cannabis in Thailand has ignited a complex debate over its legal status and societal impact. While the policy aimed to boost the medical marijuana industry and provide economic opportunities, the unintended rise in recreational use has sparked discussions about a potential reclassification.

Public Health Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, a key advocate for the decriminalization, emphasized that the policy was intended to promote medical use, not recreational. However, the current legal framework lacks clear regulations governing recreational use, leading to widespread availability and potential misuse.

The Bhumjaithai Party, led by Anutin, initially pushed for the delisting of cannabis to benefit the medical industry and provide economic opportunities for Thai citizens. However, the subsequent surge in recreational use, particularly among youths, has raised concerns about potential health and social consequences.

Opposition parties have criticized the government for inadequate regulations and are advocating for cannabis to be relisted as a narcotic under the Narcotics Act. They argue that the current situation exposes young people to potential harm and lacks sufficient safeguards.

A recent poll revealed that a majority of Thais support stricter regulations on cannabis use. Concerns have been raised about the potential impact on public health, particularly regarding mental health issues and addiction, especially among youths. Additionally, there are worries about the potential for increased crime and social disorder.

The government now faces the challenge of balancing the economic benefits of a burgeoning cannabis industry with the need to protect public health and safety. Finding a solution that addresses the concerns of both advocates and critics will be crucial in determining the future of cannabis in Thailand

Why It Matters

Thailand’s shift in cannabis policy has garnered international attention, serving as a case study for the complexities of drug policy reform. The potential reclassification of cannabis underscores the challenges of balancing economic opportunities with public health and safety considerations. The outcome of this debate will have significant implications for Thailand’s legal landscape, public health policies, and the future of its cannabis industry.

Potential Implications of Relisting Cannabis as a Narcotic

If cannabis is relisted as a narcotic, it could lead to stricter regulations on its cultivation, distribution, and use. This may impact the growth of the medical marijuana industry and limit access for patients who rely on cannabis for therapeutic purposes. Additionally, it could result in increased criminal penalties for possession and use, potentially leading to a rise in incarceration rates.

Alternatively, if the government opts to maintain the decriminalized status, it will need to implement robust regulations and public health campaigns to mitigate the risks associated with recreational use. This includes age restrictions, educational initiatives, and support systems for individuals struggling with cannabis dependence.

The Bigger Picture

The debate surrounding cannabis legalization and regulation is a global phenomenon, with countries around the world grappling with similar challenges. The Thai government’s decision regarding cannabis will likely be influenced by international trends and best practices in drug policy reform. It is crucial to consider the experiences of other nations that have legalized or decriminalized cannabis, examining both the successes and challenges they have encountered.

Source: Thai PBS World



Source link

Continue Reading

banking

“A big deal”: What the feds’ move to reclassify marijuana means for Colorado cannabis

Published

on

By



Cannabis advocates in Colorado cheered the Biden Administration’s reported move to reclassify marijuana and said the decision likely would reduce businesses’ tax burden significantly.

Industry leaders cautioned that such a move — if finalized — would not resolve some major challenges facing the industry, such as limited access to banking. But they pointed to the symbolic importance of preparations by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration to downgrade the substance’s drug classification.

A man pours cannabis into rolling papers as he prepares to roll a joint the Mile High 420 Festival in Civic Center Park in Denver, April 20, 2024. (Photo by Kevin Mohatt/Special to The Denver Post)

Read the rest of this story on DenverPost.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media