Approximately one month after state officials announced that the tax rate of cannabis taxes would increase from 15 to 19 percent on July 1, the assembly voted 74-0 to approve the legislation of the Matt Haney Assembly (D) to delay the change for five years.
The bill now goes to the Senate for consideration, but the defenders hope to see their language incorporated to a separate budget trailer that would enter into force with promulgation, unlike next year, as would be the case under Haney’s bill.
Although the legislation introduced would have directly repealed the proposed tax increase, since then it has been modified to delay its implementation until fiscal year 2030-2031.
United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) officials applauded the assembly vote.
Joe Duffle, president of Local UFCW 1167, said that increasing the tax rate “would only increase the number of failed legal cannabis” in the state.
“AB 564 Freezes the special cannabis tax at 15 percent and gives cannabis legal businesses an opportunity to fight to keep afloat in an industry that is all contracting saying. “Without this bill, the illegal cannabis industry will only bloom and will continue to put unseeded cannabis products, not turns and not regulated in the hands of consumers.”
https://www.instagram.com/p/dka13eonrwi
Under the legislation, The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA), Working With The Department of Finance, Would Be Require by a Cannabis retailer that the department estimates will generate an amount of renvenue equivalent to the amount what would Have Been Collected in the prior fiscal year year, ”The text by Bill says.
The department would need to “estimate the amount of income that would have been collected in the previous fiscal year in accordance with the weight -based cultivation tax” and “estimate this amount projecting the income of cultivation taxes based on the weight that would have been collected in the previous calendar year based on the information available for the department”.
“The specific objective of the reduction of the CANNABIS special tax rate is to provide immediate fiscal deduction to the cannabis industry,” says the measure. “The legislature can measure the effectiveness of this objective for the amount of gain or loss in the tax revenue of special cannabis taxes resulting from the reduction of the tax rate of special cannabis taxes allowed by this law.”
Also Mandates That CDTFA, on December 1, 2026, and every later year, California “presents a report to the Legislature … which details the amount of gain or loss in the tax revenues of special cannabis taxes resulting from the reduction of the tax rate of special cannabis taxes allowed by this law.”
The ruling of the Supreme Court of the State also arrived only weeks after California officials presented a Report on the current state and the future of the state marijuana marketWith independent analysts hired by regulators concluding that the federal prohibition of cannabis that prevents interest trade is significantly reinforcing the illicit market.
Governor Gavin Newsom (D) signed a bill in 2022 that would have He empowered him to enter Commerce Agreements of Interestatal Cannabis with other legal states, but that power was concerned with the federal orientation or an evaluation of the State Attorney General who sanctioned said activity.
4/20 is the much-loved Marijuana Culture Day, a topic California is very familiar with.
And, probably not coincidentally, California Governor Gavin Newsom published a statement on Monday, highlighting the Golden State’s cannabis industry and a decade of posthumous achievements Proposition 64which legalized the personal use and cultivation of marijuana for adults 21 years of age and older, reduced criminal penalties for certain marijuana-related offenses, and authorized the reinstatement or expungement and sealing of prior, relevant marijuana-related convictions.
“California has cleaned up the paperwork, seized the illegal product, and created a legal market that works,” Newsom said in a statement. “While our work continues, we are focused on strengthening this legal market so that it can compete and succeed.”
To read the rest of this article on KTLA, Click here
Tucked away among irrigation canals and orchards, a nondescript Central Valley building is home to what is likely the largest collection of cannabis ever assembled. Inside, there is a constant buzz of activity as dozens of workers in reflective jackets unload semi-trucks filled with cannabis and move box carts back and forth across the warehouse floor. It’s like someone took a Costco and swapped the toilet paper pallets for millions of joints, vapes, and cannabis flowers, all packaged and ready to go.
This is a shelter for Nabi, California’s Largest Distributorthrough which 30% of the legal market passes on its way from pot farms to retail. You’ve probably never heard of the company, but if you’ve bought legal marijuana in California, there’s a good chance Nabi has touched it.
While thousands of cannabis companies are dying in California a spectacular collapse of the state’s previous largest distributorNabis has quietly grown into one of the biggest winners in the California cannabis market. The company makes about $100 million a year and is profitable — a rare feat in the world of legal cannabis margins — and recently became the largest distributor in New York. according to CEO Vince Nino.
To read the rest of this article on SF Gate, Click here
It’s been nearly a decade since California voters legalized recreational cannabis, but production and sale remain illegal in much of the state — and the black market dominates.
In fact, eight times more marijuana is grown illegally than through legal channels. That’s a far cry from the vision of Proposition 64, the 2016 ballot initiative that promised to legitimize the lucrative cannabis industry and usher in an end to the war on drugs. Now it’s clear that a lot of that “didn’t happen,” said Keith Humphreys, a Stanford University behavioral sciences professor who studies drug policy.
“It was packaged as a free lunch,” he said. “There are no free lunches.”
That doesn’t mean the predictions of Proposition 64’s opponents have come true, either. On the campaign trail, school board members and alarmed parents predicted that marijuana would get into the hands of kids more often and that stoned drivers would cause more collisions. State data shows that neither happened.
To read the rest of this article on the Mercury News, Click here