Bipartisan congressional lawmakers are making a potentially immediate decision President Donald Trump to move forward with federal marijuana overhaul—Democrats like Rep. Alex Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) call the reform a “no” and others like Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) have pushed back against the proposal.
It was first reported on Thursday that Trump plans to sign an executive order on the reorganization, possibly directing the attorney general to complete the process started by the Biden administration to reclassify cannabis under Title III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
Since then, several lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have weighed in on the plan in interviews with Marihuana Moment. While Democrats may disagree with the president on many policy issues, they have generally welcomed news of the restructuring’s development, though they would eventually like to see the federal ban end entirely rather than increase change.
Ocasio-Cortez said it was a “no brainer” to implement the policy change, which would legalize marijuana but remove some barriers to research and allow cannabis businesses to take a federal tax deduction, symbolically recognizing the plant’s medical value.
“I have honestly felt that it has been a race between the two major parties to get reform,” said the congressman. “I mean, it’s inevitable, so of course I’m all for that move.”
Asked about reports that House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) told Trump not to reschedule, Ocasio-Cortez said an executive order would bypass lawmakers who oppose it. The speaker “has no pen” in such orders, he said.
“If he wants to try to pass some legislation and push his entire Republican team to do that, I think that’s within his power,” the congressman said.
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), co-chair of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus, told Marihuana Moment that while it’s true that Trump plans to advance rescheduling, that would be a “game changer” and a “huge” accomplishment.
However, he said that it is difficult for any member of parliament to take his word seriously, “because the president has often changed his position on various policy issues in the past. “I hope (he will act on the rescheduling) and it will come true,” he said.
Rep. Dina Titus (D-NV), another co-chair of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus, told Marijuana Moment that “Trump’s proposal would be a positive step toward cannabis policy reform, but more work remains.”
Although @POTUS’s proposal would ease restrictions on medical cannabis research and ease some of the state’s tax burden on illegal cannabis businesses, classifying marijuana as a Schedule III substance still allows for the unfair and disproportionate incarceration of recreational users and… https://t.co/wx4J2X3q6F
“While it would ease restrictions on medical cannabis research and alleviate some of the tax burden on state illegal cannabis businesses, classifying marijuana as a Schedule III substance still allows for the unfair and disproportionate incarceration of recreational users and limits access to banking services for cannabis businesses,” he said. “We must continue to address the systemic inequality associated with scheduling cannabis as a dangerous drug.”
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA), for his part, did not weigh in on the merits of the reconsideration proposal, but told Marijuana Moment that he was with the president Thursday afternoon and “didn’t hear that” about plans to end the reform process.
One of the House’s most outspoken anti-marijuana lawmakers, Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD), insisted that he doesn’t “agree with everything the president does, and I don’t.” He also appears to question the veracity of recent reports about the imminence of a restructuring move, stating that he was told “for sure” it would happen on Thursday, which did not materialize.
There have been mixed reports on the timing of a possible reconsideration action, with some sources still hopeful it will happen on Friday, CNBC to report that the executive order would be issued on Monday of next week and as early as Axios to report that the reform is expected to come early next year.
Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC), chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), told Marihuana Moment that rescheduling is a “terrible idea” and noted that he had never discussed the issue with the House Speaker.
In a statement Friday, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) said she was “encouraged to see the first move by the Drug Enforcement Administration under President Biden to reorganize marijuana, and I urge President Trump to continue that effort.”
“Common sense tells us that marijuana should not be in the same category as deadly drugs like heroin, and reclassifying it is a small step forward in creating economic opportunity, supporting research into the medical benefits of marijuana, and increasing public safety,” he said. “However, much more work remains to be done. I will continue to advocate for the complete decriminalization of marijuana and the expungement of the records of Americans convicted of marijuana possession.”
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) reacted to the news by criticizing the Biden administration after it “failed” to complete marijuana rescheduling, and said he hopes the Trump administration doesn’t make the “same mistake.”
Meanwhile, Trump’s former White House press secretary, Sean Spicer, discussed the news development on an episode of his “The Huddle” podcast on Friday and said Trump’s potential reshuffle action, like other policy issues, “comes back to power and money.”
“There are a lot of people who instinctively think it’s a good play with young voters,” he said. “The bottom line, this whole reclassification, really comes down to the financial part of this.”
Spicer added that there is a “bank part” because cannabis companies have long faced a federal ban on accessing banking services, regardless of state laws. However, it inflated the impact of the reorganization on that issue, because placing marijuana in Schedule III of the CSA would not make it federally legal, so some banks would likely continue to avoid serving the marijuana industry even if this modest reform were enacted.
“It’s a big business with a lot of money, and I have to believe that’s what it really comes down to,” he said. “The president is not running for re-election … there are a lot of people who will not be happy about this. I am one of them.”
“You walk through downtown (Washington, DC) or any city, it smells like pot and piss,” he added. “I think, given where we are as a society, the last thing we need to do is make drugs more accessible. I don’t think it’s a good idea, but I’ll tell you, I think where people are missing the story is: Follow the money.”
Trump said this in mid-August he would make the reorganization decision in a week. But despite the growing timeline and rumors, a White House spokesperson told Marihuana Moments on Thursday that “no final decision has been made on rescheduling marijuana.”
The Washington Post reported Thursday afternoon that Trump planned to issue an executive order to federal agencies to move ahead with cannabis rescheduling.
The outlet also said the president met with marijuana industry executives Robert F. Kennedy Jr. earlier this week in the Oval Office. with Secretary of Health and Human Services and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz. During that meeting, Trump called Johnson, the House Speaker, who spoke out against the cannabis redistricting,
If the administration ultimately enacts the rescheduling, it would mark one of the most significant developments in federal marijuana policy since its prohibition half a century ago, when it was banned under Article III. With a reclassification, marijuana has medical value and a lower abuse potential compared to Schedule I drugs like heroin.
Trump endorsed the rescheduling — as well as an initiative to legalize access to industrial banking and adult use in Florida — on the campaign trail. The president had been silent on the issue since taking office for a second term, until a meeting in August where, in response to a reporter’s question, he announced that the administration would decide to reschedule in a few weeks.
Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.
A union and a marijuana justice nonprofit are fighting for worker protections and fairness for small operations as the multibillion-dollar industry moves closer to coming online in Virginia. Retail cannabis sales in Virginia could begin next November, but debate continues over how to set up the market in a way that’s fair to workers and small businesses.
A committee of state lawmakers met earlier this month to discuss the details of how to establish and regulate a retail cannabis market in Virginia. The debate has been going on for years and Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin after a deadline blocked Virginia’s entry into an industry that last year had more than $30 billion in sales.
Democratic Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger has said she supports the creation of a legalized retail market, so it’s likely to happen on her watch. Virginia already has medicinal cannabis and it is legal to possess an ounce for personal use. But unlike neighboring Maryland, it’s still illegal to buy and sell cannabis, for now.
Virginia lawmakers are developing legislation to establish a retail cannabis market in Virginia. They are balancing several goals, such as ensuring that small businesses are not pushed around by massive corporations; supporting local farmers in this ag-heavy situation; Righting wrongs perpetuated by racist accusations of the war on drugs and protecting public safety.
“It’s a bad situation for a lot of hemp growers and processors and retailers.”
Author: Charlotte Rene Woods, Virginia Mercury
Richmond-based Bingo Beer officially entered the growing national market for hemp-derived THC products when it introduced THC seltzers earlier this year.
The non-alcoholic beverage option is growing nationwide as an alternative for people looking to cut back on or eliminate alcohol altogether. A recent Gallup poll showed that the percentage of Americans who drink alcohol has dropped to 54 percent.
Analysts and farmers say, however, that the hemp-based THC industry could come to an abrupt halt by November of next year, as Congress voted to ban most hemp-derived THC products in a last-minute government spending bill that ended a last-minute government shutdown.
THC seltzers and other hemp-based products are a “large and growing segment of the economy,” Bingo Beer co-owner Jay Bayer told the Mercury earlier this year.
“I don’t think the solution is to put the genie back in the bottle,” Bayer said on a recent call. He added that offering THC products has been an “exception” for some in the alcoholic beverage industry, as long as they meet the needs of consumers.
“If we switched from marijuana to THC, consumers would come with us,” he said.
An uncertain future
Hemp businesses across the nation are trying to map out their next steps. In North Carolina, for example, hemp businesses are facing potential legal battles to defend their industry, as in other states where cannabis is not legal.
But Virginia is in a “privileged” space, Pure Shenandoah co-owner Tanner Johnson said on a recent call. He runs the company with his siblings, whose products run the gamut of industrial hemp’s uses, from a “hemp” research contract awarded in 2023 with the US Air Force to supplying Bingo Beer’s THC seltzer.
As Congress laid out the foundations for the industry in 2018, Johnson compared the hemp-restricted provision in the government spending bill to pulling the “rug” out from under people. But companies like his have diversified portfolios and may find it easier to do business in Virginia than in states where legal cannabis markets do not exist or are forthcoming. However, he said, he is taking care of things at the national level.
As a representative of the Virginia Cannabis Association, he will also provide legislators with insights and ideas to craft and pass legislation to enable the new market.
“It’s a bad situation for a lot of hemp growers and processors and retailers,” Johnson said. “But in Virginia, we almost feel like we’re threading a needle where this industry is closing as another industry is opening.”
Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.
Despite the initial boom and great promises of great opportunities, the hemp sector is struggling in many countries around the world. From the recent hemp ban in the US, to a similar ban in Italy, which has effectively halted the growth of this industry.
Effects of hemp prohibition Among the 3,000 companies associated with Canapa Sativa Italia (CSI) – the Italian hemp industry association – 10% closed after the hemp ban amendment was signed. Another 10% are preparing to go abroad. Numbers can be interpreted in many ways, one of these interpretations paints a space under pressure. The reality is that the Italian hemp market continues to expand despite a regulatory structure that struggles to treat it as agriculture.
Research commissioned by CSI and conducted by MPG Consulting in April 2025 shows a very detailed picture. The flower market is worth 1,960 million euros, with 22,379 full-time employees in the supply chain. The study of the economist Davide Fortin and the lawyer Maria Paola Liotti, presented in the Chamber of Deputies on April 2, portrays an area that already behaves like modern agriculture. “It creates value, it supports jobs, and it does so with a sustainability profile that many other crops would envy. What it still lacks is institutional recognition,” they say.
Mattia Cusani, one of the first members of CSI and now its president, farms legal hemp on the Sila plateau. For him, potential is not an abstraction. He describes the hemp chain as a ready-made model of the circular economy. “Production methods, crop variability, use of residues from crop lines. It all exists,” he says. “All that is missing is a technical desk for operation and the removal of several long-standing legal knots. At the center of this stalled system sit workers between the ages of 25 and 40. They form one of the few agricultural sectors that is expanding rapidly in the country. Moreover, they belong to the generation that has experienced the worst economic shocks in recent years.”
Along with other associations, the CSI also demands a basic alignment from Brussels. “The express inclusion of flowers among the plant parts authorized for use. Treating open field and greenhouse cultivation equally. Maintaining the full legality of industrial uses such as seeds and fibers. And unifying police controls through a single ministerial decree, because today’s practices vary a lot and create uncertainty and pressure on farms.”
Stories from the field Two entrepreneurs who built their businesses legally now face confiscations caused by changes to the hemp ban.
In Rome, Noemi closed her shop at the beginning of November. He is 34 years old, with a degree in archaeology. For years he worked paid shifts at restaurants to cover expenses. In 2017, he and a flatmate invested what little they had to enter the hemp market. They opened a small shop selling Carmagnola and Futura 75, two of the varieties allowed for cultivation. Over the years, that store became a reference in a difficult neighborhood without a real meeting place. They refused to expand the franchise of foreign chains and focused on a single local store. A few days of legal confusion erased all that.
In Sardinia, the agricultural company Orti Castello seized more than 8,000 plants at the end of October 2025. The intervention report lists 2,467 items, even counting already cut stems mislabeled as sprouts. Each plant was grown from certified seed and was low in THC. Now the company is waiting to release its crop. For Massimiliano Quai and his colleagues, the shock is not limited to the lost inventory. The farm has already had thefts in the field despite the presence of guards. All this within a company that has grown continuously since 2018, through biological methods and consistent demand.
Massimiliano repeats the same idea. “Our best year has always been the next,” he says. “The store moves about 500 euros a day. Tea and honey sell fast. Only since the beginning of 2025, purchases have reached 62,910 euros. In all these years, we have had 6 months of flat or negative results. Everything else has been a constant upward movement. The plan is simple. Stay in Sardinia and consolidate. We only have to be open once, we have chosen a second site abroad. In Italy, in 2018, the political climate seemed favorable.”
MPG Consulting research places these stories within two possible futures. “According to the current model, the diverse ecosystem of shops, e-commerce platforms and tobacco shops keeps the market close to 1,960 million euros. Employment remains high, the supply chain remains diverse. The alternative is a state monopoly controlled by tobacco shops, with a tax burden of 56.5. In this scenario, the market would have a direct and indirect impact of more than 144,000 million euros. evaporate, and employment would fall to around 6,000 workers.”
However, demand grows. “The lack of commercial communication is not slowing down the market. Many are choosing hemp flowers as a substitute for tobacco rather than a substitute. It becomes part of the process of moving away from one of the most harmful and addictive substances available.”
A bunch of growers MPG Consulting also maps the crop side. Small growers sell everything directly. Medium producers divided between retail and wholesale. Large growers rely on standardized varieties and volumes. Medium plants are the innovative key of the whole chain. They test varieties, refine phenotypes and drive the system forward. They are also the weakest link if a monopoly model becomes a reality, unlike large growers who can operate in a rigid centralized environment. “The Italian hemp sector grows anyway. The question hanging in the air is not whether it can grow, but whether the rules will ever grow with it.”