Connect with us

Cannabis News

Indiana Won’t Ban Hemp THC Products This Year After Last-Minute Legislative Push Fails

Published

on

A backer of the ban on THC products complained that lawmakers would end the session “without doing anything” about hemp.

By Leslie Bonilla Muniz, Indiana Capital Chronicle

Indiana bans synthetic and intoxicating drugs derived from hemp he was dead for less than a week before he was resurrected and died again—this time, at least until the next year.

Indiana will go another year without a 21-plus age limit on intoxicating hemp products, Sen. Aaron Freeman, R-Indianapolis, complained Friday.

Lawmakers have tried time and time again regulate delta-8, TCHA and other powerful cannabinoid productswho have been in a legal gray area for eight years. THC is the active ingredient in marijuana, which remains banned at the federal level and in the Hoosier State.

Indiana’s efforts have consistently failed amid House and Senate gridlock over how expansive or restrictive the state’s vision should be.

Freeman’s Senate Bill 250 took a tougher tone, reflecting Congress’ closing of a so-called loophole in the 2018 Farm Bill. That law defined legal hemp as any part of the plant containing less than 0.3 percent delta-9 THC by dry weight, sparking a booming industry of other intoxicating cannabinoids.

A federal funding law passed in November specifies that all types of THC count. It also limits THC products to just 0.4 milligrams per container, and completely bans those made in labs. It will come into effect next November.

Freeman said lawmakers would end the legislative session “doing nothing” about hemp, leaving the state statute inconsistent with the federal one. The Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution says that federal law wins over conflicting state codes, but Freeman was still concerned.

“Right now, marijuana is illegal, (but) tell that to any state that has legalized it. Don’t tell that to California; they don’t care,” he said. “So they’re saying we’re not following federal law. Now, I think that’s a really dangerous precedent. … And by the way, Indiana is going to be in that category in November, and that’s scary to me.”

The Indiana bill also established a regulatory scheme for any low-wattage product on the market, notably with a long-standing age requirement.

Industry representatives previously testified that customers would not want THC products that do not produce the drug. The legislation would not affect CBD, which is not intoxicating.

It cleared the committee stage and then passed the Senate on a 35-15 vote. The bill reached the House floor but was not called for second reading before a key deadline on Monday.

“Another example of what we need to have a unicameral Legislature,” he told the Capital Chronicle at the time.

Legislators from the four groups met in conference committee on Thursday to unveil plans for the divestment. Senate Bill 144 incorporating its provisions and the Senate-passed version of Freeman’s bill. But he was not on the conference committee the report He was released on Friday afternoon.

Rep. Elizabeth Rowray, R-Yorktown, said it was the third version of the CCR and acknowledged that the hemp drug ban was “added” and “was later removed.”

Indiana is among 10 states that do not allow the sale of medicinal and recreational herbs. The state has stubbornly resisted efforts to legalize marijuana—even the Republicans.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order in December to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug, but that hasn’t been finalized yet.

This story was first published by the Indiana Capital Chronicle.

Marihuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Maximizing cannabis yields with intercanopy and subcanopy lighting

Published

on

By







Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Transportation Groups Warn Feds Of Marijuana Rescheduling’s ‘Consequences’ For Drug Testing Of Truck Drivers And Pilots

Published

on

By

A coalition of transportation and safety organizations said they have “serious safety concerns” about the Trump administration’s move to federally regulate marijuana.

Led by the American Trucking Association, the groups sent a letter to federal officials Monday asking them to take steps to ensure truck drivers, pilots, transit operators and other safety-sensitive workers continue to be tested for cannabis.

“If employers do not take the necessary steps to preserve the ability of security-sensitive transportation workers to test for marijuana, this change could have significant consequences for the safety of passengers and the entire transportation industry,” wrote Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, and Transportation Secretary J.

The organizations said they understand that federal officials are being “urgently” reorganized under an executive order from President Donald Trump, that they are “deeply concerned that the current process does not adequately take into account agencies responsible for transportation safety or protecting the traveling public” and that they want the agencies to “work together.” ongoing cannabis redistricting hearings and rulemaking process to address these concerns.

In May, the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued new guidelines saying just that Truck drivers, airline pilots and other safety-sensitive workers still cannot use medical marijuana without penalty despite the Trump administration’s move to reschedule.

“Marijuana use is incompatible with safety-sensitive functions,” the department said.

Medical review officers (MROs) who receive drug test results indicating cannabis use cannot rule them out as negative for illegal substance use, even if an employee claims it was a result of state-licensed medical marijuana.

“Currently, there is no way for an MRO to verify that a laboratory-confirmed marijuana drug test result is positive when an employee claims the positive was caused by a state-licensed marijuana product,” the DOT said, explaining that after the reprogramming, medical marijuana dispensed under state law “does not” constitute a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The transportation groups said in the new letter that the DOT’s drug-testing program “is in accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs and HHS-certified laboratories.”

“While DOT has expressed its intention to continue testing marijuana, a commitment we greatly appreciate, it is unclear whether DOT will retain its ability to rely on HHS procedures and certifications after the rescheduling,” they wrote. “Without this alignment, DOT may retain the authority to conduct testing, but lack the scientific and procedural infrastructure to do so.”

“Practically, this would mean that truck and bus drivers, pilots, flight attendants, air traffic controllers, air mechanics, railroad workers, dispatchers and signal workers, transit operators and pipeline workers could continue to perform high-risk safety roles without a reliable means of verifying that they are not actively using marijuana. It relies on controlled substance testing to identify end use and prevent potentially impaired individuals from fulfilling their safety-related obligations. While the planning could create legal or regulatory loopholes, the regulated employer-based drug testing agency warned that the final rules should not jeopardize marijuana testing for safety-sensitive transportation workers.”

“Regardless of the broader policy goals of the review, the federal government should not move forward to preserve transportation drug testing programs and mitigate the risks of increased and unchecked deterioration of our roads, railroads, public transportation systems, pipelines, airspace, and maritime corridors,” the letter says.

The organizations specifically ask federal officials to:

  • Support long-term marijuana testing for all safety-sensitive transportation workers;
  • Confirm the authority of DOT-regulated employers to perform such tests;
  • Ensure HHS laboratory certification and testing guidelines remain available and aligned with DOT’s safety mission; and
  • Establish a coordinated federal strategy to address the transportation security implications of rescheduling.

“The public and the workers who keep our transportation system running safely deserve a process that ensures these safeguards are firmly in place before any final action is taken,” he said. the letter he says

Earlier this month, the House Appropriations Committee approved a provision to allow federal officials to continue requiring government employees and security-sensitive employees, such as truck drivers and airline pilots must be drug tested for marijuana, “regardless of any future change in legal status or schedule.”

This was followed by a press conference organized by prohibitionist groups and a drug-testing industry association, where both Republican lawmakers joined the proclamation. “Cut” to marijuana rescheduling by asserting that safety-sensitive transportation workers can still be punished for testing positive for THC.

Legislators and abolitionist activists argued that moving marijuana to Schedule III would lead to a 1986 executive order signed by President Ronald Reagan defining illegal drugs under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in relation to the use of cannabis by truck drivers and other airline employees.

Last October, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy suggested that President Donald Trump was “putting pressure” on rescheduling cannabis.arguing that marijuana is “truly addictive” and that policy reform on the issue sends a “dangerous” message.

“At a time when the culture is encouraging and celebrating the use of marijuana, we’re not talking about risk,” Duffy said.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Experts say THC percentage is the wrong way to shop for cannabis

Published

on

By


Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media