Connect with us

Federal Policy

Medicare Coverage for Some Hemp-Derived Products Now Available

Published

on

Medicare Coverage for Some Hemp-Derived Products Now Available

Medicare’s pilot program covering hemp-derived products has officially launched. Under the plan, Medicare providers can be reimbursed up to $500 per patient each year for discussing and offering certain CBD products.

CBD products covered under the plan cannot exceed concentrations of 0.3% delta-9 THC, or more than 3 milligrams of THC per serving. Products must also be third-party tested and meet state and local standards. It excludes patients who have certain medical conditions, including substance use disorder and COPD.

In an April 1 statement, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Mehmet Oz said the agency “is committed to innovation that meets patients’ needs while maintaining strong safeguards and clinical oversight.”

“Under (President Donald Trump’s) leadership, we are expanding the tools available to improve patient health while generating important insights into how providers can use these tools safely and effectively in real-world care settings.” – Oz in one press release

CMS Innovation Center Director Abe Sutton added that “the initiative gives providers in certain models another tool — with necessary safeguards — to support their patients’ needs by consulting on whether the potential use of hemp products could help improve symptoms.”

The program is subject to ia suit brought by a coalition of health advocacy organizations and anti-cannabis groups that argues it violates the Social Security Act, which “does not permit CMS to sanction the possession and use of illegal and dangerous Schedule I substances by Medicare patients without express authorization from Congress.”

TG joined Ganjapreneur in 2014 as a news writer and began hosting the Ganjapreneur podcast in 2016. He is based in upstate New York, where he also teaches media at a local university.

Continue Reading

adult use

Supreme Court Rules Cannabis Consumers Have Right to Own Guns

Published

on

By

Supreme Court Rules Cannabis Consumers Have Right to Own Guns

The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday that cannabis users can legally own firearms under the Second Amendment.

The ruling stems from United States v. Hemani, in which prosecutors pursued criminal charges against Texas man Ali Hemani, who admitted to regularly using cannabis while in possession of a firearm.

In their reasoning, the justices cited a 2022 Supreme Court ruling that requires gun restrictions to be “consistent with this nation’s historic tradition of regulating firearms.”

National Rifle Association (NRA) and National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) submitted amicus briefs for the case earlier this year.

Joseph A. Bondy, chairman of the board for NORML and the organization’s co-counsel on its amicus brief, called the decision “a measured but important vindication of personal liberty and constitutional principle.”

“The Court accepted what NORML sought: that responsible adults not lose their Second Amendment rights simply because they consume cannabis, absent any individualized showing of dangerousness. Our Constitution protects people, not stereotypes, and does not allow the government to turn cannabis use alone into a categorical mark of civic worthlessness.” – Bondy, in a statement

Based in Portland, Oregon, Graham is the editor-in-chief of Ganjapreneur. He has been writing about the legalization landscape since 2012 and has contributed to Ganjapreneur since our official launch in…

Continue Reading

advocacy

ASA Outlines Patient Rights After Medical Cannabis Rescheduling

Published

on

By

ASA Outlines Patient Rights After Medical Cannabis Rescheduling

Cannabis advocacy organization Americans for Safe Access (ASA) released a new guide for cannabis patients and caregivers on Tuesday, designed to help individuals understand and exercise their rights under federal reclassification of medical cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act.

The guide, “Medical Cannabis Patients: Claiming Your Federal Protections and Privileges,” seeks to explain what the federal moves mean for patients, caregivers, providers, advocates and institutions.

In a statement, Steph Sherer, ASA founder and executive director, said patients “have waited decades for federal recognition, but recognition alone does not protect someone from losing housing, employment, health care, benefits or custody.”

“Patients now have new federal protections and privileges, but they must be willing to ask for them. The ASA created this guide because rights are not self-enforcing, and stigma will not disappear just because the law has changed.” – Sherer in one press release

The guide describes the rights and protections now available to medical cannabis patients under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fair Housing Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act; however, he cautions that “agencies, employers, landlords, health care facilities and public programs will not automatically update their policies just because the law has changed.”

“Federal medical cannabis laws have changed. Stigma will delay enforcement,” Sherer said in a statement. “Some systems will move slowly. Some will resist. Some may try to ignore this change altogether. That’s why patients, caregivers, providers, advocates and allies need to act now.”

The guide provides tools that patients and caregivers can use to protect their rights, request written explanations, document discrimination, and request individualized review.

The ASA also launched a campaign to end discrimination against medical cannabis patients and is collection of reports from patients, caregivers, veterans, workers, tenants, parents, service members and others who have experienced discrimination because of their medical use of cannabis.

“Documentation is not just paperwork,” Sherer said in a statement. “This is how individual experiences become evidence for policy change. Every denial letter, drug testing policy, housing notice or denial of care helps show federal agencies and lawmakers where outdated systems are still harming patients.”

The campaign is also calling on the administration of President Donald Trump (R) to immediately issue guidelines for medical cannabis patients under the new rules.

Continue Reading

cannabis policy

Republican Attorneys General Sue to Block Trump’s Cannabis Rescheduling Order

Published

on

By

Republican Attorneys General Sue to Block Trump’s Cannabis Rescheduling Order

State attorneys general from Nebraska, Indiana and Louisiana last week filed a lawsuit challenging the Justice Department’s recent order to reschedule medical cannabis. Nebraska Examiner reports.

Nebraska AG Mike Hilgers, Louisiana AG Liz Murrill and Indiana AG Todd Rokita, all Republicans, argue in the lawsuit that the rescheduling move will make it easier to push adult legalization policies. The lawsuit also challenges the expanded production of medical cannabis and tax changes under the law the new federal regime.

AG Hilgers opposed Nebraska’s campaign to legalize medical cannabis in 2024, but about 7 in 10 voters approved the reforms. Hilgers is up for re-election this year and will face Democrat Jocelyn Brasher, a former Nebraska assistant attorney general.

“Nebraskans should be outraged that taxpayer resources are being spent to challenge the Trump administration’s medical cannabis reform on an issue overwhelmingly approved by voters at the ballot box. Mike Hilgers is … interfering with decisions that families, patients and doctors have already made clear they support.” – Brasher, in a statement

In Louisiana, lawmakers created a program to make medical cannabis accessible to patients with specific debilitating conditions, while in Indiana, cannabis is not legally available for any purpose.

Meanwhile, last December, President Trump issued an executive order calling for the rescheduling of cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act. The Justice Department issued a follow-up order last month, officially making state-regulated medical cannabis products Schedule III. The latest order, however, does not affect other forms of cannabis, meaning that state-licensed adult-use operators are still violating federal law.

The DEA is planning hearings to consider the full rescheduling of cannabis out of Schedule I, which is supposed to be reserved for drugs with “no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media