Connect with us

Cannabis Law News

Alaska Courts Clear Past Cannabis Convictions From State Database

Published

on


Cannabis Now reports

The Alaska Supreme Court will clear the records of about 750 cannabis convictions from a state database in a move to help protect past offenders from the negative impact of a criminal record for conduct that’s no longer against the law. Under an order signed by the court’s five justices in January, records of past marijuana offenses will be removed from Courtview, the state’s online database of court cases, on May 1.

The court’s action continues the push to expunge convictions for cannabis-related offenses in states that have legalized marijuana in an attempt to mitigate the harms caused by years of cannabis prohibition and the War on Drugs. The order applies to cases in which the defendant was at least 21 years old, and possession of up to one ounce of cannabis was the only charge.

Legislative attempts by lawmakers to remove cannabis convictions from Courtview have so far been unsuccessful, although bills are pending for the current legislative session. The action by the Supreme Court largely accomplishes the goal, but the new policy doesn’t remove the records of cannabis-related convictions from all state databases. Attorney Jana Weltzin said the move is a positive development for cannabis policy reform efforts in Alaska.

“If you’re older than 21 and you violated simple marijuana possession—meaning marijuana under an ounce—and you had it on your person, and it’s not connected with any other crime, then the Supreme Court of Alaska says we’re removing those from Courtview,” Weltzin told local media.

Nancy Meade, general counsel for the Alaska Court System, said that the change originated with administrative staff and was considered by the justices through the Supreme Court’s normal procedures.

“Given that (cannabis) has been legal for eight years, it appeared to the Supreme Court that this was an appropriate time not to have people, as I say, suffer the negative consequences that can stem from having your name posted on Courtview,” Meade said in a statement quoted by the Alaska Beacon. “Because the conduct is considered legal right now,” she said.

Court’s Order Doesn’t Affect All Conviction Records

The decision by the Supreme Court doesn’t expunge past cannabis convictions from the state’s criminal records, which are maintained by the Alaska Department of Public Safety (DPS). Officials clarified that information on such convictions would still be available at courthouses for inspection by members of the public and through formal background checks.

“The court system isn’t the official criminal record repository for the state of Alaska,” Meade said.

Records of arrests and convictions can have an impact on the ability of past offenders to secure employment and housing. But past legislative efforts to remove cannabis conviction records from Courtview haven’t been approved by lawmakers.

“A lot of folks in my district, they have these barriers that are put in place, and a simple rule change, policy change, legislation, could change it for their entire lives,” said Republican state Rep. Stanley Wright.

Last year, the Alaska House of Representatives approved a bill to conceal cannabis convictions from Courtview and criminal background searches by a vote of 30-8. The state Senate, however, failed to pass the bill before the end of the 2022 legislative session. A similar bill to shield cannabis convictions was pre-filed for the 2023 session by Wright on January 19, less than two weeks before the Supreme Court’s decision to remove the records from Courtview. Forrest Wolfe, Wright’s chief of staff, said that shielding the records of cannabis convictions can help mitigate the exodus of working-age people in Alaska that has in part led to a labor shortage in the state.

“It’s all about reducing barriers to entry, especially for employment,” Wolfe said. “In Alaska, we have a huge workforce shortage. If you were 21 years old or older, and it was some sort of a nonviolent crime, you were charged with and convicted of, now that cannabis is legal in the state, we don’t think it should be reflected negatively on your record,” Wolfe added.

Wright is reportedly considering whether his bill, which already has bipartisan support from three Democrats and two independent lawmakers, is still needed after the Supreme Court order to remove cannabis convictions from Courtview, while Democratic Sen. Löki Tobin is reportedly considering introducing a similar bill. Unlike the Supreme Court’s policy, which only covers court records, more comprehensive legislation could also protect information on cannabis convictions from being released through criminal background checks. If Wright’s bill is passed, up to 8,500 past cannabis convictions could be affected and hidden from view, according to information from the DPS.

The Alaska Supreme Court has a history of handing down decisions that have protected the rights of cannabis users. In 1975, the court ruled that the right to privacy guaranteed in the Alaska Constitution protects the possession and use of small amounts of marijuana in private residences, effectively legalizing cannabis for personal use.

Alaska Courts Clear Past Cannabis Convictions From State Database



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis Law News

The Oregonian: Naked Oregon man wounded by exploding weed pen, lawsuit claims

Published

on

By


Thanks to Vince Sliwoski for tipping us off to this only in Oregon story !

A man who was getting baked while bare of any clothes was seriously injured when his weed pen exploded, a lawsuit filed Friday claims.

Gustavo Mendes now seeks $230,000 from the manufacturer of the malfunctioning marijuana vaporizer and the Eugene pot shop where he bought it, according to allegations in the Lane County Circuit Court suit.

The incident happened Feb. 13, 2023 as the 28-year-old was standing in his bathroom “in a state of undress,” according to the lawsuit.

Mendes took a puff or two and realized the pen was superheating in his hands, the lawsuit says; in a flash, it exploded — spraying burning chemicals onto his eyes, torso and below his waist.

The subsequent fire on the bathroom counter and floor cost $20,000 to repair, while Mendes’ medical bills at a Springfield hospital and Gresham eye care center topped $3,500, the suit says.

After previously earning $68,000 a year as a welder, Mendes is now sensitive to light and must apply eye drops regularly, necessitating a change in careers, according to his attorney.

He had purchased the pen, branded under the name Quantum Alchemy, three days prior at Hwy 99 Cannabis Co. Both the retailer and manufacturer are named as defendants in court papers.

Quantum Alchemy’s website has expired and an email inquiry bounced back.

https://www.oregonlive.com/marijuana/2025/02/naked-oregon-man-wounded-by-exploding-weed-pen-lawsuit-claims.html

 

Quantam has been getting recall notices as far back as 2022 as this OLCC alert testifies.

nr120222-Cannabis-Product-Recall-Pesticide-Bobsled-QuantumAlchemy



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis Law News

EWeb Page / SEC Docs – SEC Charges Acreage Holdings, Inc. For Accounting Violations

Published

on

By


ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING
File No. 3-22389

January 10, 2025 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced settled charges against Acreage Holdings, Inc. for violating the books and records provision of the federal securities laws when it created false records regarding a transfer of approximately $4 million that was temporarily moved into the company’s bank account a few days before the end of Acreage’s 2019 fiscal year.

According to the SEC’s order, Acreage caused an affiliated entity to transfer approximately $4.2 million into Acreage’s bank account on December 26, 2019, with the express understanding that Acreage would return the full amount at the beginning of the new year, which it did on January 3, 2020.  Acreage then allegedly created journal entries and other records that mischaracterized the round-trip transfer, first as a repayment of debt owed by the affiliate and later as a short-term loan to Acreage.  The SEC’s order further finds that after certain employees’ concerns about the round-trip nature of the transaction were escalated to a member of Acreage’s board of directors, Acreage recorded an additional journal entry that effectively reversed the transaction.

The SEC’s order also finds that during the audit of Acreage’s fiscal year 2019 financial statements, Acreage created and provided written documents to the accounting firm conducting the audit that misrepresented and omitted material facts about the round-trip cash transfer.  As a result, the SEC’s order finds that Acreage violated Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by failing to make and keep books, records, and accounts that accurately and fairly reflected the round-trip cash transfer.

Without admitting or denying the findings in the SEC’s order, Acreage agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing violations or future violations of Section 13(b)(2)(A), and to pay a civil penalty of $225,000.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Kiran Patel, Nandy Celamy, Russel Feldman and George N. Stepaniuk, and was supervised by Thomas P. Smith, Jr., all of the New York Regional Office.



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis Law News

Homberg Leaves Dentons For New Post At Gunnercooke

Published

on

By


Peter Homberg writes on Linked In Today

After more than 12 exciting years at Dentons, I’m delighted to share that I have joined the international law firm gunnercooke.

I’m excited to offer my clients truly exceptional service, leveraging gunnercooke’s flexibility, innovation, and collaborative culture to support them closely through their legal challenges, while also shaping and expanding my practice in a direction I’m passionate about.

I look forward to the many exciting projects and cases to come, please reach out if you’d like to know more.

 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media