Connect with us

Cannabis News

Analyzing the Relationship Between Cannabis and Schizophrenia in 2023

Published

on


cannabis for schizophrenia

In recent times, mental health conditions like schizophrenia have become a go-to scapegoat for those pushing for tighter cannabis regulations. Proponents of stricter rules often lean on personal stories and anecdotal evidence to make their case, advocating for things like THC caps or limits on how much cannabis people can buy. On the surface, these restrictions might seem like a reasonable way to protect public health. But when you dig a little deeper, you’ll see that they’re actually a sneaky attempt to limit our choices and freedoms when it comes to legal cannabis use.

 

Now, let’s talk about the supposed link between schizophrenia and cannabis. Time and time again, researchers have tried to pin down a causal relationship between the two. But guess what? In pretty much every study published on the subject, they’ve only managed to come up with correlational data – no smoking gun that proves one causes the other. This gray area leaves plenty of room for misinformation and manipulation, allowing those who favor stricter cannabis laws to exploit people’s fears about mental health disorders.

 

So, let’s dive into a recent article that tells the heart-wrenching tale of Cat Mayberry, a young woman who battled schizophrenia and eventually lost her life after struggling with cannabis addiction– at least according to her parents.

Through this story, we want to expose the tactics used to control the narrative around drug legalization and show why basing policy decisions on emotion-driven anecdotes isn’t the best approach.

By taking a closer look at the information in the article, we hope to spark a more well-rounded, evidence-based conversation about the intricate relationship between cannabis and mental health.

Now, I want to make it clear that I don’t stand in opposition of the Mayberry’s. What they experienced is horrific. The loss of a child is something that will break a person.

Therefore, I share their idea of increasing awareness, education, etc – but I believe it should be expanded to mental health in general.

We’ll explore how Schizophrenia works, and unpack different perspectives to get a nuanced view on this subject. I’ll remain respectful of the life of Catherine since I believe that this is an important topic, and that should be taken with the utmost care.

 

The Story of Cat

Before we dive into a deeper analysis, let’s first summarize the article in question, which tells the story of Cat Mayberry, a young woman who struggled with schizophrenia and addiction. This is a brief overview of Cat’s life, her transformation, and her parents’ accounts, featuring direct quotes from the article.

Cat Mayberry had been diagnosed with ADHD since an early age, and her parents, Trent and Jane, claim that she was a typical teenager. It wasn’t until college that things took a dark turn. In her freshman year, she began smoking cannabis, which her parents believe triggered her schizophrenia. Cat’s mental health rapidly deteriorated, and she was soon admitted to inpatient care for her condition.

 

According to her parents, the antipsychotic medications did not improve Cat’s mental health but made her feel numb and gain weight. Throughout her struggle with schizophrenia, Cat also continued to use marijuana. Her parents recalled that at one point, she would walk around with headphones on, playing music loudly to try to drown out the voices in her head. “That one she played over and over and over,” Jane said.

Cat went in and out of inpatient and outpatient care, and her parents eventually got her placed in supportive housing for people with severe mental illness. However, she had lost her old friends and developed an interest in body art, including getting piercings and tattoos. While living at Rising Cedar, the best supportive-housing facility in the Twin Cities, Cat was introduced to methamphetamine.

Her parents found her in an alley living in a tent with a homeless person after she mistakenly believed she had been kicked out of her apartment. Trent and Jane came to the devastating realization that their daughter’s life would never return to normal. As Trent put it, “Her brain was ruined at this point. We sensed it.”

Tragically, Cat was found dead at the age of 24, with a glass pipe and a packet of meth laced with fentanyl nearby. Her father, Trent, said, “I look at it as, God answered our prayers. We knew it was going to happen. It was just a matter of time. It happened at a point where our family was as strong as it could possibly be.”

Cat’s story has become a rallying cry for proponents of stricter cannabis regulations, as her parents believe that her marijuana use was the primary cause of her mental health issues. Trent said, “People can say, yeah, she died from a fentanyl overdose, but that’s not what really killed her. That’s what killed Cat. That’s not what killed Catherine. Catherine was killed by cannabis.”

This is the major sentiment from the article. The rest of the article provides “supporting evidence” in the form of studies, but as you’ll see later – these may not be the main area of concern.

 

Let’s begin breaking down what’s wrong with this perspective and how we can have a better approach to drug policy that will attempt to reduce the impact of addictive personalities, mental disorders, and how we as society deal with these issues.

 

Prohibition simply doesn’t work

 

Prohibition has been a historically ineffective method of regulating substances, and this holds true for cannabis as well.

As the tragic story of Cat Mayberry demonstrates, the answer to addressing cannabis-related issues is not through prohibition, but rather through education and understanding the risks associated with its use.

Even Cat’s parents recognize that prohibition was not the root of their daughter’s struggles, but rather a lack of education and awareness about the potential risks of using cannabis.

 

It’s crucial to remember that just like any other substance, cannabis can have different effects on individuals based on their unique biological makeup. For those with a predisposition to schizophrenia or other mental health issues, using high-potency cannabis products may exacerbate their conditions.

However, it’s unfair and unreasonable to limit the choices and rights of those who do not have such predispositions and can use cannabis products responsibly without negative consequences.

One possible approach to addressing this issue is to implement screening measures from a young age, which would help identify individuals who may be more susceptible to developing mental health issues when using cannabis. By doing so, families and individuals can be better prepared to navigate potential risks and make informed decisions about whether or not to use cannabis products.

Moreover, exploring alternative treatments for mental health conditions like schizophrenia can also contribute to a more comprehensive and compassionate approach to managing these issues.

For instance, holotropic breathwork, a technique that involves controlled breathing patterns, has shown promising results in helping individuals with schizophrenia (Garcia-Romeu, A., & Richards, W. A. (2017).

Current perspectives on psychedelic therapy: use of serotonergic hallucinogens in clinical interventions. International Review of Psychiatry, 29(4), 331-341.). This method, along with other evidence-based treatments, could offer additional options for individuals struggling with mental health conditions, reducing the reliance on substances like cannabis as a coping mechanism.

It’s essential to acknowledge the complex relationship between cannabis use and mental health issues, and to approach this topic with nuance and empathy.

 Rather than resorting to heavy-handed prohibition or restrictive regulation, we must focus on empowering individuals with the information and resources they need to make responsible choices about their cannabis use.

This includes increasing awareness about the potential risks associated with high-potency cannabis products for those predisposed to mental health issues, and supporting the development of alternative treatment options for those who need them.

The use of ADHD medications, particularly in children and adolescents, has been a topic of ongoing debate in the medical community. While these drugs have been proven to be effective in managing the symptoms of ADHD, there is still much to learn about the long-term effects of these medications on brain development. It’s worth noting that the conversation around the potential risks of these drugs is often overshadowed by the more prominent discussions surrounding cannabis.

ADHD medications, such as methylphenidate (Ritalin) and amphetamine (Adderall), are stimulants that work by increasing the levels of certain neurotransmitters in the brain. While these drugs can help improve focus and reduce impulsivity in individuals with ADHD, there are concerns about the potential impact of these medications on the developing brain.

A study by Andersen, S. L. (2005) published in the journal Neuropharmacology, raises concerns about the long-term consequences of using stimulant medications during critical periods of brain development. The study suggests that early exposure to these drugs may lead to alterations in the brain’s dopamine system, which could have implications for future vulnerability to substance abuse and other mental health issues. However, more research is needed to fully understand the implications of these findings.

Another area of concern is the potential link between ADHD medications and the development of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders. A study by Moran, L. V., Ongur, D., Hsu, J., & Castro, V. M. (2019) published in JAMA Psychiatry found that amphetamines (such as Adderall) were associated with a higher risk of psychosis compared to methylphenidate (Ritalin). While the absolute risk of developing psychosis was still relatively low, the findings underscore the importance of carefully considering the potential risks and benefits of these medications when prescribing them to young patients.

Common side effects of ADHD medications include appetite suppression, sleep disturbances, headaches, and increased heart rate. These side effects can be concerning, especially when one considers that these drugs are being prescribed to children and adolescents whose brains are still developing.

It’s worth questioning why pharmaceutical drugs like ADHD medications are often “excluded” from the conversation when it comes to causality in the development of mental health issues, while cannabis takes center stage. Perhaps this is due to the fact that pharmaceutical drugs are heavily regulated and prescribed by medical professionals, whereas cannabis is still a controversial substance that is only recently gaining widespread acceptance for medicinal and recreational use.

Nonetheless, it’s essential to recognize that all substances, whether pharmaceutical or recreational, can carry risks and potential side effects, especially for those with pre-existing vulnerabilities or predispositions to mental health issues. A more balanced conversation that acknowledges the potential risks and benefits of all substances is necessary to make informed decisions about their use.

 

Mental illness is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of its various causes and triggers. In cases like Cat’s, it’s all too easy for parents and society to pin the blame on a single substance, such as cannabis. However, it’s crucial to recognize that there are numerous factors that can contribute to the development and progression of mental illnesses like schizophrenia.

 

Schizophrenia, a severe mental health disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized thinking, can be triggered by a variety of factors. These include genetic predisposition, environmental factors, brain chemistry imbalances, and substance abuse. Stressful life events, such as the death of a loved one, relationship issues, or the pressures of school and work, can also contribute to the onset of schizophrenia.

 

It’s essential to consider the broader context when examining the role of cannabis in cases like Cat’s. The suicide rate among individuals with schizophrenia is significantly higher than in the general population, and many people with the disorder turn to substances as a way of coping with their symptoms. Cat’s story, in which her struggles became more apparent during her college years, raises questions about the other potential factors that may have contributed to her mental health decline.

 

College can be a particularly challenging time for young adults as they navigate academic pressures, form new relationships, and experience a newfound sense of independence. These stressors, combined with a predisposition to mental illness, can act as triggers for the onset of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders. In Cat’s case, it’s essential to consider the various factors that may have contributed to her struggles, rather than placing the blame solely on cannabis.

 

Where the focus should be, as Cat’s parents rightly emphasize, is on education. By providing individuals, particularly those at risk, with accurate information about the potential dangers of substance use, we can help them make informed decisions about their consumption. This approach acknowledges the need to protect vulnerable individuals without limiting the choices of those who can safely and responsibly use high-potency cannabis products.

 

Comparing the situation to the sale of peanut butter, which can be deadly for some people with allergies, offers an interesting perspective. Just as we don’t ban peanut butter for everyone because of the risk it poses to a small minority, we shouldn’t limit the availability of high-potency cannabis solely based on the potential risks to a specific subset of the population. Instead, we should focus on education and awareness to help those at risk make informed choices about their consumption.

 

In conclusion, mental illness is a complex issue that cannot be solely attributed to the use of cannabis or any other single factor. It’s crucial to examine the various triggers and contributing factors in cases like Cat’s, rather than placing the blame on a single substance. By focusing on education and awareness, we can help those at risk make informed decisions about their consumption, without limiting the choices and rights of others who can safely and responsibly use high-potency cannabis products. This approach promotes a more balanced and compassionate understanding of the challenges faced by individuals with mental illness and their families.

 

MARIJUANA AND SCHIZOPRENIA, READ ON…

DOES CANNABIS CAUSE SCHIZOPHRENIA

DOES CANNABIS CAUSE SCHIZOPHRENIA IN PRE-DISPOSED PEOPLE?

 



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Federal Cannabis Roundup: Nixon, DEA, Tobacco-Hemp . . . and the DOOBIE Act (*sigh*)

Published

on

By


Last week, I wrote a round-up post on Oregon cannabis. This week, I thought I’d drop a line on the federal happenings. Which are quite a few.

The Nixon tapes

This was a fun piece of news, unearthed by Minnesota cannabis lobbyist Kurtis Hanna. Ernesto Londoño then broke the story on September 14th for the New York Times, which you can read here. In short, Nixon conceded that marijuana “is not particularly dangerous,” despite calling the plant “public enemy No. 1” only two years prior. And he opined that punishments ought not be so serious for possession of the plant.

I say this news is “fun” because it’s more interesting than surprising and I doubt it will have much impact. Nixon was a mean old liar, and one with an animus toward certain groups of people. I also don’t think this revelation will persuade the vocal, diminishing minority of prohibitionists to change their minds. I like it anyway, especially as cannabis history nerd. We were right!

DEA embraces two-step review for marijuana rescheduling

This one is important, in my opinion. It relates to the method of analysis DEA must undertake when determining whether a drug, including marijuana (and psilocybin, and any other verboten substance), has a “currently accepted medical use.” In April, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) put DEA in a box on this one, explaining that the old, five-part test was “impermissibly narrow.” OLC thus endorsed the two-part test. On September 17th, DEA assented to the test for Schedule I review.

The two-part test bodes well for DEA’s rulemaking, now underway, to move marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III of the federal Controlled Substances Act. How do we know? Well, the Schedule I stans don’t like it, for starters. This is because, under two-part review, a drug can have currently accepted medical use: a) even if that drug hasn’t been approved by FDA, and b) even if the drug wouldn’t pass DEA’s scrapped five-part test. So, more runway.

DOOBIE Act on the way?

I’m embarrassed even having to type that. But yes, some Congressperson named a federal cannabis bill the “DOOBIE Act,” unfortunately. With a press release and everything.

This proposal would prohibit federal agencies from denying security clearance and employment to people simply because they have used marijuana. In my reading of the actual bill, these agencies could still ding an applicant for past marijuana use, but they couldn’t “base a suitability determination . . . solely on the past use of marijuana by the individual.” The word “solely” needs to go.

Because this bill applies only to “Executive agencies” under 5 U.S. Code § 105, it also wouldn’t have prohibited, say, Joe Biden from doing his “doobie” staffers dirty, which he definitely did.

FDA gets the nod on tobacco-hemp

I like the Congressional Research Service (CRS) and often send people thataway. On September 16th, CRS published a new report titled “Legal Effect of Marijuana Rescheduling on FDA’s Regulation of Cannabis.” Here are my extremely condensed takeaways:

  1. FDA can authorize tobacco products containing hemp-derived cannabinoids (although it hasn’t yet). This is because hemp is not a controlled substance.
  2. Marijuana, even at Schedule III, would still be banned as a tobacco additive (and probably always will be). This is because FDA would need to approve specific cannabis medicines first, and it never does that for botanical drugs.

Here we have one of those cognitively dissonant outcomes often seen with the cannabis plant. As a reading of law it makes sense, but as to policy it’s nonsense. You can thank Richard Nixon and other cannabis heels for that.



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Does Hemp Have Cancer-Fighting Properties?

Published

on

By


hemp for fighting cancer

Does Hemp Have Cancer-Fighting Properties?

Hemp, Weed’s Cousin, May Have More Therapeutic Value Than We Thought

 

While both hemp and cannabis come from the same plant, they possess significant differences.

 

Hemp, in particular, has become the less popular cousin of weed because more people were interested in the psychoactive properties of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). And since hemp only contains less 0.3% or less of THC, recreational consumers weren’t keen on it.

 

Historically speaking, hemp has been famous for thousands of years across ancient civilizations around the world. It was cultivated for its reliable fibers, used in textiles, rope, clothing, and paper. Even back then, hemp’s nutritious properties were known. People ate its seeds and extracted oil, while it was used for treating many conditions in ancient China and ancient India.

 

However, hemp plants do contain a much higher amount of cannabidiol (CBD), and due to the sheer demand for CBD products lately for their medicinal benefits, hemp became better-known. Now, the global CBD market is estimated to be worth a cool US $7.71 billion, and it’s only expected to grow more. After all, the CBD in hemp has been found to be tremendously powerful especially for treating a wide range of diseases and afflictions, from anxiety to insomnia, and much more.

 

However, CBD isn’t the only therapeutic value found in hemp.

 

Can Hemp Help Fight Cancer?

A recent study by the Rowett Institute took a look into the potential value of specific fibers added to the diet of patients with prostate cancer, and its effect, if any, on tumors. The NHS Grampian Charity has invested £90,000 into this research, which has been led by Professor Anne Kiltie, who is a member of Friends of ANCHOR Clinical Chair in Oncology, at the University of Aberdeen.

The new study, which was conducted by Dr. Aliu Moomin, Dr. Sylvia Duncan, and Dr. Madi Neascu, focused on hemp fibers such as hemp hull, inulin, and pectin. They analyzed how these fibers affect gut bacteria in animal models, and its overall impact on tumor cells.

 

According to Professor Kiltie: “This funding will allow us to build on our previous work demonstrating a benefit to dietary fibre supplementation in terms of improved tumor control and protection of the bowel from radiotherapy damage, by looking at other types of fiber and how these interact with the gut microbiota,” she said. The idea is that if they notice improvements when cancer patients supplement with fiber, and it actually helps delay the progression of cancer, this would be instrumental improving patient outcomes.


We have long known that diet plays a critical role in cancer development and prevention, so it only makes sense to take advantage of the healing power of gut microbiome for cancer patients. There are several studies that show a strong link between gut microbiome and one’s cancer risk. One study in particular found that patients with melanoma, who possessed healthy gut bacteria, had much better responses to immunotherapy treatments compared to patients who had poorer gut bacteria.

 

“We hope that this work would lead to a large randomized clinical trial in the UK in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. If the fiber supplementation is found to delay progression of the disease and prevent the need for active treatments, this would significantly improve outcomes for these patients and their quality of life,” she added, shared by a release published by the University of Aberdeen.

According to Dr. Simon Dunmore, the NHS Grampian Charity research officer: “The importance of intestinal microbiome in a wide range of health areas, including the development of cancer, is becoming increasingly highlighted by numerous scientific studies,” he said. “This study will provide important evidence of the role of a beneficial gut microbiome composition in reducing the aggressiveness and development of prostate cancer and the positive effect of dietary fibre on the microbiome,” he added.

 

Studies On Hemp Oil For Cancer


There are other studies supporting the viability and potential of hemp compounds for treating cancer. In another recent study out of Shanghai in China, researchers found that hemp oil extracts which contain the terpenes humulene and caryophyllene were found to be effective in treating pain and fighting cancer.

 

For the study, Chinese researchers analyzed the tumor-fighting and painkilling properties of hemp oil on mice. They found that after administering the hemp oil extracts, it was found to significantly reduce tumor growth. “Thes results reveal that HEO [hemp essential oil] plays a role not only in tumor chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy treatment, but also in anti-tumor treatment which offers key information for new strategies in cancer treatment and provides reference for the medicinal development of hemp,” they said.


Additionally, since hemp contains abundant levels of cannabidiol (CBD), it can be used for alleviating the symptoms of cancer treatment. Studies have shown that CBD is effective for helping relieve pain, stimulate the appetite, and minimize nausea and vomiting – all of which are tremendously valuable for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. CBD can also be integrated into one’s lifestyle to reduce chronic inflammation and stress, which, when left untreated, can contribute to cancer progression.

 

Conclusion


These studies are promising: hemp is clearly not just important for its industrial benefits, but it can also help save lives. The compounds found in hemp plants may help fight and treat cancer, shrink tumors, and even enhance the effectiveness of traditional cancer therapies. If you or a loved one want to explore using hemp for wellness and cancer prevention, you may consult with healthcare professionals for tailored medical advice.

 

HEMP FOR FIGHTING CANCER, READ ON…

CBD FOR OVARIAN CANCER

CBD FROM HEMP HELPS FIGHT OVARIAN CANCER IN NEW STUDY?



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Why is Everyone But the Youth Smoking Weed?

Published

on

By


youth marijuana use drops

In recent years, the landscape of cannabis use has undergone a surprising transformation, defying long-held predictions and challenging conventional wisdom. For decades, opponents of marijuana legalization have wielded a powerful argument: legalizing cannabis would send the wrong message to youth, inevitably leading to increased consumption among teenagers and young adults. This fear has been a cornerstone of anti-legalization campaigns, painting a grim picture of a future where young minds are clouded by widespread drug use.

However, as more states and countries have embraced cannabis legalization, an unexpected trend has emerged. Contrary to dire predictions, youth cannabis use has not skyrocketed. In fact, in many places, it has remained stable or even declined. Meanwhile, it’s the older generations who are increasingly turning to cannabis, with one of the fastest-growing demographics of users being adults over 50.

This shift isn’t limited to cannabis alone. Across the board, today’s youth are showing less interest in various substances, including alcohol and tobacco. It’s a trend that has left researchers and social commentators puzzled. Are we witnessing the rise of a more health-conscious, drug-averse generation? Or, as some might cheekily suggest, are young people today simply less inclined towards experimentation and risk-taking than their predecessors?

The implications of this trend are far-reaching, challenging not only our assumptions about drug policy but also our understanding of generational behaviors and values. On one hand, we could interpret this as a positive development – a sign that education and awareness campaigns are working, producing a generation more informed about the risks of substance use. On the other hand, it raises questions about changing social dynamics and what drives young people’s choices in today’s world.

In this article, we’ll explore the factors behind this intriguing phenomenon. Why are fewer young people turning to cannabis and other substances, even as legal barriers fall? And what’s driving older adults, particularly those over 50, to embrace cannabis in growing numbers?

By examining these trends, we hope to gain insight into the complex interplay of social, legal, and cultural factors shaping attitudes towards substance use in our society.

 

As we delve into the statistics, a clear trend emerges: fewer young people are indulging in substances across the board. Whether it’s alcohol, tobacco, or cannabis, today’s youth are increasingly abstaining. This shift has left many scratching their heads, wondering what’s behind this sudden display of temperance among the younger generation.

At first glance, one might be tempted to chalk it up to the success of drug education programs. After all, today’s youth are bombarded with information about the risks and consequences of substance use from an early age. Gone are the days of simplistic “Just Say No” campaigns and exaggerated scare tactics. Modern drug education tends to be more nuanced, focusing on harm reduction and evidence-based information.

However, as someone who went through the gauntlet of ’90s drug education myself, I can attest that knowledge doesn’t always translate to abstinence. My generation was subjected to a barrage of anti-drug messaging, yet many of us still experimented with various substances in our youth. So while improved education may play a role, it’s unlikely to be the sole factor driving this trend.

Perhaps we need to look at what today’s youth are doing instead. Enter the elephant in the room: social media. In many ways, social platforms have become the drug of choice for the younger generation. The constant dopamine hits from likes, shares, and notifications create a neurological response eerily similar to that of traditional stimulants. As kids spend more time glued to their screens, they may be less inclined to seek out other forms of stimulation.

Moreover, the ubiquity of social media has changed the nature of rebellion. When I was young, smoking a joint or sneaking a beer felt like acts of defiance against adult authority. But in a world where parents and grandparents are posting selfies and sharing memes, how does one rebel? For some youth, abstaining from substances their parents use might be the ultimate act of generational differentiation.

The normalization and legalization of cannabis in many areas have also played a role. As weed becomes more mainstream and socially accepted, it loses its countercultural edge. The image of cannabis has shifted from a symbol of rebellion to something your cool aunt does to relax after work. This transformation may have inadvertently made it less appealing to youth seeking to establish their own identity.

Lastly, we can’t ignore the practical aspects. As more adults turn to legal dispensaries for their cannabis, the street market that traditionally supplied curious teens has faced stiff competition. Legal establishments with strict ID checks have made it harder for underage users to access cannabis, potentially contributing to the decline in youth use.

In essence, today’s youth aren’t necessarily more virtuous or health-conscious than previous generations. They’re simply products of their environment – an environment that offers myriad digital distractions, blurs the lines of generational rebellion, and increasingly restricts access to substances. As we continue to navigate this shifting landscape, it’s crucial to remember that while reduced substance use among youth is generally positive, it doesn’t tell the whole story of their well-being. The challenges and pressures faced by today’s young people are unique, and our understanding and support should evolve accordingly.

 

As we turn our attention to the other end of the age spectrum, an intriguing trend emerges. While youth cannabis use is on the decline, adults over 50 are blazing up in record numbers. This demographic has become one of the fastest-growing segments of cannabis consumers, leaving many to wonder: why are the “olds” suddenly embracing their inner stoner?

To understand this phenomenon, we need to dive into the fascinating world of the endocannabinoid system. This complex network of receptors in our bodies doesn’t fully mature until around age 25. As we age, our natural endocannabinoid production tends to decline, leading to what some researchers call “endocannabinoid deficiency.” This can manifest in various ways, from mood disturbances to physical discomfort.

Enter cannabis. When older adults consume marijuana, they’re essentially giving their endocannabinoid system a much-needed boost. It’s like adding oil to a squeaky machine – suddenly, things start running more smoothly. Many report improvements in sleep, mood, and general well-being. It’s not just about getting high; for many, it’s about feeling balanced and functional.

Moreover, as we age, our bodies become less resilient to the effects of alcohol. A night of heavy drinking in your 20s might result in a manageable hangover, but the same indulgence in your 50s or 60s can knock you out for days. Cannabis, on the other hand, offers a gentler experience. You can enjoy an evening toke and still be ready to face the day come morning. For many older adults juggling work, family, and other responsibilities, this is a significant advantage.

Accessibility is another crucial factor. As more states legalize cannabis, it’s becoming increasingly easy for adults to walk into a dispensary and purchase high-quality, regulated products. Gone are the days of relying on sketchy dealers or questionable sources. This ease of access, combined with the normalization of cannabis use, has made it a more appealing option for older adults who might have been hesitant in the past.

Let’s not forget the economic aspect. In many cases, cannabis can be a more cost-effective option than alcohol, especially when consumed in moderation. A single joint can provide an evening’s worth of relaxation, often at a lower cost than a night out drinking. For retirees or those on fixed incomes, this economic advantage can be particularly appealing.

The health benefits of cannabis, especially when compared to alcohol, can’t be overstated. While excessive use of any substance can be harmful, moderate cannabis consumption doesn’t carry the same risks of liver damage, addiction, or long-term health consequences associated with alcohol abuse. For older adults looking to unwind without compromising their health, cannabis presents an attractive alternative.

In essence, the rising popularity of cannabis among older adults is a perfect storm of biological, practical, and social factors. It offers a way to potentially improve health and well-being, provides a gentler recreational experience, and aligns with changing social norms. As more research emerges on the potential benefits of cannabis for age-related issues, we may see this trend continue to grow.

Of course, it’s important to note that cannabis use, like any substance, should be approached responsibly and with an understanding of potential risks and interactions with medications. But for many in the over-50 crowd, it seems that cannabis is proving to be a welcome addition to their golden years.

Who would have thought that the “reefer madness” generation would end up being the ones to fully embrace the green revolution?

 

CANNABIS USE DROPS AMONG YOUTH, READ MORE..

WHY TEEN MARIJUANA USE DROPS AFTER LEGALIZATION

WHY CANNABIS USE DROPS 9% IN TEENS AFTER LEGALIZATION!

 

 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media