Connect with us

Cannabis News

Arkansas Supreme Court Ruling Could Let Lawmakers Roll Back Medical Marijuana Access

Published

4 weeks ago

on

“What bothers me the most is that it was applied retroactively, not prospectively. It reversed 115 years of work by the people of the state of Arkansas on these initiatives.”

Antointe Graje, Arkansas Attorney

After Emily Williams was diagnosed with cancer in 2010, she struggled to find medication that alleviated the side effects of chemotherapy, such as nausea and loss of appetite. Eventually, he tried marijuana and it gave him relief.

“I was grateful,” he said. “I felt grateful.”

That experience inspired the Fayetteville retiree to create Arkansas’ medical marijuana program in 2016 after voters approved a constitutional amendment in 2016.

That program has become a billion-dollar industry, with more than 115,000 patients using marijuana to treat conditions ranging from Crohn’s disease to post-traumatic stress disorder. But a murky legal battle over who can change citizen-directed amendments to the Arkansas Constitution cast doubt on the program’s future.

The court ruling is part of a nationwide battle over citizen-driven ballot measures in states like Missouri and Nebraska. Arkansas is one of 24 states that allows citizens to propose state laws, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Since the state’s first dispensary opened in 2019, thousands of Arkansans have joined the program, including Christopher Duffy, a 35-year-old Fayetteville resident who said medical marijuana helped his anxiety and sobriety. Duffy said he would be committed to sobriety if less marijuana is available, but he worries about others.

“I’m lucky to have a support system like that, where when things got tough or I started to struggle, I could reach out,” she said. “There are those who don’t have that and I fear for them.”

Williams, 69, fears losing access to medical marijuana, which she uses to manage the ongoing complications of her disease.

“If I’m not able to use this, my life would be completely and utterly negative,” he said.

Those concerns were sparked by the Arkansas Supreme Court’s 74-year-old precedent in December, with a ruling declaring that lawmakers can change citizen-led constitutional amendments with a two-thirds vote: 67 votes in the House and 24 votes in the Senate.

The decision stemmed from a case challenging the Legislature’s passage of laws amending the Arkansas Medical Marijuana Amendment. However, the authority recently confirmed by lawmakers extends beyond medical marijuana to other citizen-directed amendments, including those affecting casinos.

David Couch, a Little Rock attorney who helped write the medical-marijuana amendment, said the court’s decision “absolutely” adds more pressure for a new ballot measure it protects to succeed.

If the measure proposed by Save AR Democracy makes it to the 2026 ballot and is approved by voters, it would prohibit lawmakers from amending the Arkansas Constitution themselves and require voters to approve any new law that affects the initiative and referendum process.

While he understands how the court reached its conclusion, Couch said the justices erred in their application.

“What bothers me the most is that they applied it retroactively, not prospectively,” he said. “The people of the state of Arkansas overturned 115 years of work on these initiatives.”

Rep. Aaron Pilkington, R-Knoxville, said the court’s ruling confirmed what he had long believed to be true; however, he does not believe that the members of parliament are doing “little by little” to change the public corrections.

Pilkington took office in 2017 after 53 percent of voters approved medical marijuana. While Republicans were generally not in favor of it, Pilkington noted that party leaders were not standing in the way of what voters wanted.

“I think we’ve shown a track record that, even though the Legislature may not necessarily agree with it, they’re going to do what the voters want,” he said. “If we didn’t, then if we tried to force this issue or try to cause this and that, I think you would see the consequences in the next election.”

Pilkington has since championed medical marijuana legislation, including an unsuccessful effort to allow dispensaries to deliver. Pilkington said there may be some changes to the program, but he’s not entirely open to changing it because of growing sales revenue that funds certain programs.

Arkansans are expected to spend a record $291.1 million on medical marijuana in 2025, according to the state Department of Finance and Administration. Legislation passed last year allows tax revenue from those sales to support free breakfast for students.

While it may be used sparingly, the power to amend the state constitution can be useful to address policies that aren’t working as intended or to reflect a change in perspective since an amendment was passed, Pilkington said.

It also allows lawmakers to address issues that need immediate attention instead of waiting two years to present a measure to voters, Senate President Pro Tempore Bart Hester said.

The Arkansas Constitution can be amended when voters approve a measure proposed by legislators or citizens who must qualify for the ballot by circulating petitions. The proposed amendments can be examined every two years in general elections.

Republicans currently hold large majorities in both the House and Senate, but Hester said the two-thirds vote is a “tremendous and difficult bar to meet,” regardless of which party holds the majority.

The Cave Springs Republican said lawmakers will use that authority only “when absolutely necessary” and will likely wait until the 2027 legislative session to review citizen-led amendments, such as those that have received heavy funding from out-of-state interests. Hester also mentioned revising measures related to medical marijuana and casinos as “big fixes” with multiple provisions.

“I think it might be reasonable for the Legislature to look at it a little at a time as opposed to holistically, and I think that’s the responsible thing to do,” he said.

Hester noted that lawmakers can only amend the marijuana amendment, not repeal it. This leaves room for the program to roll back or expand without being completely finished.

While the Legislature has no plans to disenfranchise voters, Duffy said he believes there are some lawmakers willing to do so, so he hopes the Save AR Democracy ballot measure succeeds.

By July 3, the group must collect 90,704 signatures to enter the ballot.

“I don’t see any intention of the Legislature to override the will of the people, but I do think there are some who are willing to do that and that’s what worries me,” Duffy said.

If that measure fails and lawmakers go into the 2027 legislative session with the amendment’s authority upheld by the court, Duffy said he would see medical marijuana taxes increase.

That could encourage patients to buy from neighboring states like Missouri, where recreational marijuana is also legal, to siphon revenue out of Arkansas, he said.

Williams is skeptical of the lawmakers’ cutbacks, saying he believes they intend to “destroy it to the point where it’s almost impossible to use.”

“I’d like to ask one of those lawmakers if they know what it’s like to get up in the morning and wonder how sick you’re going to feel that day,” he said.

This story was first published by the Arkansas Advocate.

Photo elements courtesy of the user rawpixel and Philip Steffan.

Marihuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Cannabis News

A steel roof transforms the silo into a solid building instead of a container with a cover on it

Published

4 hours ago

on

March 4, 2026

By






The future of steel roofs in water silos






The demand for steel roofs on water silos in the Netherlands is increasing rapidly. According to Bas van der Elst of silo producer Hendic, this development reflects a structural change in the market rather than a temporary trend.

“Growers are increasingly choosing the safety of steel over traditional covers,” he says. “This is largely driven by safety concerns, but also by more stringent requirements from insurers and authorities.”

Van der Elst explains that structural reliability is a key factor behind the growing interest. “It’s about the reliability of the construction. A steel roof can withstand significant snow and wind loads, much more than a traditional roof. However, certification is often the deciding factor. At Hendic, we include the steel roof in the structural calculations and the CE certification of the entire silo. This is essential compared to PVC roofs.”

© Hendic

Why has CE certification become so important?
The importance of CE certification has increased, especially in export markets. “In Germany and other countries, many municipalities will not issue a permit without a structural calculation that complies with local regulations,” explains Van der Elst. “Insurers are also increasingly requiring the silo to be assessed and insured as a single unit. The steel roof effectively turns the silo into a solid building, rather than a basin with a sheet on top. This provides producers with legal certainty and operational peace of mind.”

Is safety a factor in addition to construction?
In addition to structural resistance, local security plays an important role. “With a steel cover, a silo is completely enclosed. We equip them with a lockable access gate, so the silo can literally be locked. Compared to a tented cover, it’s a significant improvement in yard security.”

© Hendic

Does this mean the end of the popular PVC covers?
According to Van der Elst, steel roofs do not mean the end of PVC-based systems. “The various systems we offer, from simple tension roofs to floating roofs and domes, have proven their worth and remain highly functional in most situations. However, for producers dealing with strict building regulations or extreme weather conditions, steel roofs offer the greatest added value today.”

© Hendic (gn)

For more information:
Bas van der Elst
Hendic bv
(email protected)
https://www.hendic.nl/



Publication date:













Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Florida Lawmakers Pass Bill To Provide Discounted Medical Marijuana Cards For Military Veterans

Published

4 hours ago

on

March 4, 2026

By

The Florida House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a bill to reduce the fee for military veterans to obtain medical marijuana registry identification cards.

The measure passed by Reps. Susan Valdés (R) and Michelle Salzman (R) unanimously on Wednesday in a 113-0 vote. The proposal comes after clearing three House panels and separate Senate legislation to reduce the cost of cannabis for veterans is also moving forward.

If enacted into law, HB 887 would require honorably discharged veterans to pay $15 to obtain a medical cannabis card, down from the current $75 rate for most eligible patients.

The $15 charge will also apply to replacement cards as well as annual renewals.

To receive the reduced fee, veterans must provide the state Department of Health (DOH) with a copy of the discharge form, a US Veterans Affairs (VA) identification card, or a Florida driver’s license with a “veteran designation.”

The law will come into effect on July 1 of this year.

“Medical cannabis has shown promise in relieving symptoms commonly experienced by military veterans, such as managing chronic pain, mitigating the effects of PTSD, improving sleep and reducing opioid addiction,” Valdés said on the House floor. “This bill greatly reduces veterans’ financial barriers to accessing medical marijuana, their health solution of choice.”

“Reducing the cost of access is not only a symbolic gesture to the veterans who serve us, it directly removes the often very high cost barrier that prevents already underserved veterans from participating in this program, and this is one way to show our veterans how grateful we are by turning that slate green,” he said. he saidas before notify By Florida Politics.

According to A invoice study, the reform “would have an unspecified negative fiscal impact on the DOH.” While there are currently 931,000 registered medical marijuana patients in Florida, “the number of veterans with an active medical marijuana use registry identification card is unknown” and thus “the amount of revenue reduction is unknown.”

That said, the analysis says the policy change “would have a positive fiscal impact on veterans who will see a $60 reduction in the cost of ID cards under the bill.”

Earlier this month, the Senate Health Policy Committee advanced a bill by Sen. Alexis Calatayud that would reduce medical cannabis registration fees for veterans to $15 and implement other reforms to expand access to medical marijuana.

Under that amended proposal, a physician would recommend a 70-day supply limit for cannabis, or a 35-day supply limit for marijuana smoking products for 10 supply limits. Under current law, they can recommend up to three 70-day supply limits for non-smoking cannabis and six 35-day supply limits for smoking marijuana.

The SB 1032 bill would also require doctors to evaluate patients to qualify for medical marijuana every 52 weeks, rather than the legal requirement of evaluations every 30 weeks.

Here’s an overview of some of the pending Florida marijuana bills:

—
It’s Marijuana Time tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters by pledging at least $25/month, you’ll get access to our interactive maps, charts, and audio calendars so you never miss a development.

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracking and become a Patreon supporter to gain access
—

Meanwhile, a Florida campaign seeking to put marijuana legalization on the ballot faces complications as the status of the 2026 signature drive remains in dispute. Lawyers are now asking the state Supreme Court to overturn the officials’ decision to quash the tens of thousands of applications submitted.

A new survey released this week shows that a A majority of Florida voters support the legalization of cannabis.

Max Jackson’s photo.

Marihuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron on Patreon!

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Cannabis products recalled due to “unreliable” tests

Published

1 day ago

on

March 3, 2026

By











New York State’s Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) has recalled several cannabis products after finding that reported results from a testing laboratory were “unreliable.”

OCM says it has found a total of 54 product lots that tested false positive for Aspergillus, the mold that causes disease. According to OCM, another batch of product had incorrect results for the heavy metal cadmium.

“When test results are inaccurate or unclear, product safety and, in turn, the safety of New York State consumers cannot be guaranteed,” said OCM Executive Deputy Director of Licensing, Enforcement and Laboratories Stephen Geskey. “It’s not a risk OCM is willing to take.”

This information comes from an audit of inspections and records conducted by Keystone State Testing New York between December 2025 and January 2026. According to OCM, there have been no reports of the effects of consuming any of the products.

Read more at News 10










Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media