The Australian prime minister marching in the Sydney Mardi Gras this year marked a stark shift in societal values as compared with the first time the event was staged in 1978, which saw the NSW police violently set upon the criminalised participants taking part in what was a queer rights protest.
But the gloss of Albanese’s appearance served to overshadow the strong opposition to the NSW Police Force presence at Saturday night’s event. This was in terms of the 1978 attack, the four decades of gay hate crimes that prevailed in this city and the saturation drug policing this year.
“This is the side of Sydney that the government should hang its head in shame over,” said NSW Greens MLC Cate Faehrmann on posting the above photoof police questioning a partygoer, “particularly at a time when we are supposedly showing our best to the world for WorldPride.”
As the drug law reforming politician points out, this year’s parade being part of the broader WorldPride festival meant thousands of international visitors were subjected to a heavy police patrolling with drug dogs, while some individuals were taken away to be strip searched.
A life-threatening approach
“I sat and watched with disgust as dozens of police with dogs walked up and down the long line of people waiting to be let into the party, taking away members of our queer community and strip searching them,” Faehrmann continued in her Sunday post.
The Greens drug law reform spokesperson underscored that as WorldPride is a global event, attendees from abroad will be reporting on the heightened way in which state law enforcement officers police such events in NSW on a regular basis.
Indeed, since the turn of the century, NSW police has been hounding the public with sniffer dogs, and over the last decade, this has been accompanied by strip searches. And this practice locates nothing illegal two-thirds of the time and when it does, it’s usually a small amount of cannabis.
But the traumatisation of the public that this authoritarian approach results inis not the worst of it. The NSW coroner and countless medical experts have made clear that this excessive police presence leads people to partake in risky drug-taking behaviours that sometimes leads to death.
A lifesaving approach
However, there is a nonpunitive method to prevent recreational drug harms and deaths at events like Mardi Gras and that’s pill testing. This evidence-based harm reduction intervention has been operating in certain enlightened European nations since the 1990s to the benefit of many.
Faehrmann has been calling on NSW premier Dominic Perrottet to implement pill testing in the lead up to the Mardi Gras parade, which has been all the more vital due to the drug-related death of a young person at a Sydney music festival just a week beforeWorldPride kicked off.
Sydney Criminal Lawyersspoke to Faehrmann on the day prior to Mardi Gras about greeting international visitors with walls of officers, drug dogs and strip searches, the recent festival tragedy and the drug law reform agenda she has set for the next NSW parliament after the March election.
NSW Greens MLC Cate Faehrmann
Cate, you’ll be attending the annual Mardi Gras Parade tomorrow night, which, this year, is a part of WorldPride.
Thousands of people from across the planet are set to be in attendance, and many festivalgoers will be confronted with numerous police officers with drug dogs and accompanying strip searches.
What sort of statement is this sending to the international community?
Tens of thousands of LGBTIQA+ people and their allies from all across the world are descending on Sydney to celebrate and party over the next two weeks.
Many will never have experienced the sort of harassment and humiliation that NSW police like to subject people to who are simply waiting in line to attend a dance party or club.
Any visitor attending any of the fabulous WorldPride events and who witnesses this state’s over-the-top police and sniffer dog presence or, god forbid, is subjected to a strip search will be telling not only their friends and family back home but probably the world via social media too.
I’ve called on the government to instruct the police to respect WorldPride and allow people to party safely and without harassment but it’s fair to say I’m not hopeful they will do this.
Another young person recently died in drug-related circumstances at a NSW music festival. You’ve called for the implementation of pill testing services.
Perrottet has ruled this out, which is his party’s regular line. But a clear difference between when Berejiklian ruled out this evidence-based approach and the present is that Canberra now has a state-sanctioned fixed site pill testing service operating.
How viable is it for the Liberal Nationals to deny pill testing when a jurisdiction within NSW has accepted it as a vital health intervention?
We know pill testing works. There have been zero deaths at festivals in the ACT where pill testing has been present and now people are able to get their drugs checked at a community clinic in the Canberra CBD.
We know that this means that potentially deadly substances can be identified, and that people are provided information by health professionals about how to reduce harm.
We also know that once people are told what’s in the drug they were intending to consume, some choose to dispose of the drug safely at the clinic.
When defending his decision to reject pill testing, the premier said “the safest thing is to just don’t take drugs”.
This is not only extremely frustrating, it’s reckless.
The coronial inquest into those six tragic deaths at music festivals four years ago, specifically highlighted that telling young people “just say no” not only doesn’t work but actually puts them at greater risk.
There have been calls for pill testing services in this country since early this century, but the current campaign really picked up in this state in 2015 at the time of the Baird government, following a spate of six-drug related festival deathsnationally.
Similar calls were made under Berejiklian as another six such deaths took place at NSW music festivals over late 2017 to early 2019, as you’ve just noted.
There’s been ample time for the Coalition to implement the public health intervention prior to WorldPride. So, how do you consider the global event going ahead without it?
Pill testing would have allowed people to test their drugs for strength and/or deadly substances and speak to people about how to stay as safe as possible if they do choose to use drugs.
This latest death is terribly sad and may have been avoided if it weren’t for our zero-tolerance approach to drug use where we push it underground.
The government has a wealth of expert evidence about how to prevent deaths at dance parties and music festivals, but many have been wilfully ignored.
Harm Reduction Australiahas given an open offer to the NSW government to provide pill testing services for free that could have been taken up for WorldPride.
Instead, the government is recklessly pursuing its dangerous drug policies which do not work. It’s infuriating.
Underlying these issues are calls for drug decriminalisation, which the NSW Coalition continues to refuse to properly consider, while the ACT is about to implement such a policy under a Labor-Greens government.
With NSW Labor likely voted into parliament next month, do you consider it will be more open to decriminalisation considering the same party has greenlighted it in the capital?
We know from 12 years of the Liberal Nationals that there is no hope for serious drug law reform with them in charge.
However, we’ve seen nothing positive from Labor in this area either. The major parties seem to be lockstep in continuing the failed war on drugs.
If Labor does win government, they have promised a drug summit which is something.
Whether or not they have the courage to do what the experts are saying is needed in terms of drug law reform – particularly decriminalising all drugs and treating drug use as a health issue not a criminal one – my hopes aren’t high.
Having said that, it’s my hope that the Greens will hold the balance of power in the next parliament so that we can make Labor, if they do form government, act on drug law reform and save lives.
And lastly, Cate, what can the state expect from the NSW Greens post-election in terms of seeing drug law reform being implemented?
Drug law reform will be one of my top priorities in the next term of parliament. The Greens are committed to pushing serious drug law reform in the next parliament.
I’ll be introducing legislation to legalise cannabis, protect medicinal cannabis users from unfair drug driving laws, decriminalise the personal use of drugs and provide pill testing at festivals.
Veterans targeted by medicinal cannabis businesses on social media spruiking free products and subscriptions.
In short:
Veterans are being targeted by social media ads offering access to “free” medicinal cannabis, funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA).
VeteranCann supplied medicinal cannabis to a man with a record of cannabis addiction, who ended up in “borderline psychosis” and kept sending it even after he told them he was addicted.
Another patient was bombarded with texts to book an appointment, as the DVA confirms it funded $35.99 million of medicinal cannabis in 2023/2024.
The Report
At 4:16am a Brisbane navy veteran is desperately messaging the company which prescribes and sends him medicinal cannabis.
“I am addicted to THC and I shouldn’t be using it. I feel like I am having a mental health crisis and breakdown,” he pleads, hoping to put an end to the shipments.
It had been a swift downward spiral for 35-year-old Bill*, after he was targeted with a Facebook advertisement by the company VeteranCann.
The ads offered free access to “natural therapies” and claimed it was “backed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA)”.
Despite his history of cannabis addiction being well-documented with the DVA, Bill was sent more than $1,700 worth of medicinal cannabis in less than a month after just one call with a VeteranCann doctor.
The 14 bottles — six containing the psychoactive ingredient tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) — were paid for by the DVA.
“That was when I thought, ‘wow, these guys … might be a bit dodgy here. I can’t believe they’re sending me it so quickly’,” he said.
Struggling with his mental health, chronic pain and life with a newborn baby, some days Bill would drink entire bottles of the oil — bottles which should have lasted almost a month.
Within weeks he was in a “borderline drug-induced psychosis”, had taken sick leave from work and told his wife, who was caring for their baby, he felt like a “zombie”.
Despite informing VeteranCann he was addicted, he received another two shipments of the drugs.
“What is wrong with this system? Why should addictive medication be sent three times to a drug-addicted veteran?” he said.
Veterans big business for medicinal cannabis telehealth companies
Veterans represent a lucrative market for medicinal cannabis companies.
The DVA fully funds medicinal cannabis for veterans with specific conditions when other treatments have failed, and where there is evidence of a clinical benefit.
In the 2023-2024 financial year, it spent $35.99 million to fund medicinal cannabis for 8,455 veterans.
A DVA spokesperson confirmed 6 per cent of applications to fund medicinal cannabis products for veterans were rejected.
The ABC has spoken to veterans accusing major industry players of exploitative behaviour, including questionable marketing tactics, late night texts, offers of “free” medicinal cannabis, and ads targeting them through veteran support groups.
Army veteran Sandra* started the process to access medicinal cannabis for chronic pain through VeteranCann this year.
She said she had a 20-minute consultation with a nurse before being prescribed cannabis oil containing THC by a doctor she never spoke to.
The Royal Australian College of Psychiatrists warns products which contain high potency THC — the ingredient which gives users a “high” — should be avoided due to the risk of psychosis and weak evidence of efficacy in most conditions.
The DVA requires a written application from a veteran’s specialist before approving funding for higher doses of THC, or for multiple cannabis products.
VeteranCann invites veterans to use its “in-house advocate program” to get chronic pain or injury officially accepted by the DVA, as well as access to “partnered pain specialists” to unlock fully-funded treatment — including higher dose THC.
Sandra’s regular GP, Dr Kerry Summerscales, is a veteran herself.
She specialises in treating other veterans, and was shocked to see some of the high strength products her patients had been prescribed by online telehealth companies.
“I was really quite horrified on a few levels,” Dr Summerscales said.
“It’s like going straight in. ‘Oh yeah, here’s your fentanyl patch. Oh yeah, we won’t bother trying the Panadol first’.”
VeteranCann booked appointments for both Bill and Sandra with a “pain specialist” doctor, to help get DVA funding for higher doses of THC.
When Sandra didn’t follow up, she started receiving texts from a man called Geoff from VeteranCann offering to help gain free access to medicinal cannabis including “oil, flower and gummy bears”.
“The texts were a bit weird, because they just kept coming,” Sandra, who also lives with PTSD and ADHD, said.
Dr Summerscales said she was stunned when she saw the messages.
“I saw it as downright badgering, especially when you look at the times, at 9 o’clock at night there were texts,” she said.
Eventually Sandra replied to Geoff, noting VeteranCann hadn’t consulted with her GP.
Geoff responded, “normally VeteranCann doctors don’t liaise with GPs”, before texting again to offer a follow-up call.
“Therein lies the issue,” Dr Summerscales said.
“(Veterans) do have chronic pain and some of them do have mental health issues and they are vulnerable in that way.
“If you’re not treating the patient holistically and you’re just prescribing the one medication in a five-minute consult, that’s not medicine. And that is what needs to be clamped down on.”
In a statement, VeteranCann told the ABC Geoff was a “trained and experienced veteran advocate” paid for “onboarding veterans”, but apologised for the messages which it said “should not have been sent”.
Geoff’s number was also featured in online veteran support groups, advertising VeteranCann including several run by registered charity Young Veterans
Read more including this
VeteranCann consultant terminated after misogynistic posts
VeteranCann is owned by Dispensed, a telehealth company under fire after patients with a history of psychosis were prescribed medicinal cannabis by the company. One was hospitalised and the other took his own life.
Reforms to current hemp licence regulations are set to be introduced, making it easier for regulated farmers to grow the crop and maximise its economic potential.
“Hemp” is a variety of cannabis with “low-THC” levels, which is currently defined as a maximum of 0.2%.
The plant is grown for strictly lawful purposes, such as for use in the construction and textiles industries, and only farmers with a licence are allowed to plant it.
The government has agreed to several reforms, developed in collaboration with experienced growers, to the licensing system which will help boost the industry.
Under the changes, licence holders will now be able to grow hemp anywhere on a licensed farm, reducing the unnecessary burden on farmers who currently have to set out the exact field where they will grow the plants within a farm. This change is expected to come into effect for the 2025 growing season.
Ahead of the 2026 growing season, two further changes to the regulations are planned. The first will see an extension of the maximum period for a licence from 3 to 6 years, subject to compliance with the licence terms.
The second change will allow those applying for a licence to defer its start date by up to one year, helping farmers to make business planning easier.
Minister for Crime and Policing, Dame Diana Johnson said:
These reforms will bring an important boost to this industry and cut down the unnecessary burdens that have been placed on businesses.
This government will always listen and engage with industry experts, and we want to make it easier for licence holders to capitalise on the economic potential of legally growing hemp.
Minister for Food Security and Rural Affairs, Daniel Zeichner said:
These improvements to the licensing regime for industrial hemp are a positive step for farmers.
Recognising that industrial hemp is a field-grown agricultural crop, these reforms will simplify the license application process and provide greater flexibility within the crop rotation, enabling farmers to fully realise the economic and environmental benefits of the crop.
The government recognises cannabis is a harmful substance and expects police to take action against its misuse and supply. As a Class B substance, being caught possessing cannabis carries a maximum sentence of 5 years in prison, a fine or both.
Supplying the drug is also a serious criminal offence and carries a maximum sentence of up to 14 years in prison, an unlimited fine or both.
1906 sells two different “drops,” or pills, with low doses of THC and higher amounts of caffeine marketed as “Go” and “Genius” in small cylinder containers.
The firm’s “Go” drops contain 80 milligrams of caffeine and 2 mgs of THC-extract and 5 mgs of cannabidiol [CBD]/ weed extract and other plant-based or herbal ingredients. Go is marketed as an energy stimulant.
Its Genius pills contain 20 mgs of caffeine mixed with 2.5 mgs of TCH and 5 mgs combined of CBD and Cannabigerol (CBG), also found in the marijuana plant, and other herbal or plant extracts. It’s touted as a “brain power” supplement to boost focus and memory and calmness.
The 1906 cannabis pills have been marketed in New York since February of last year.
But OCM regulators issued a “quarantine,” or stop order, for the 1906 tablet July 24 after inspecting the 1906 combined cannabis-caffeine mix products at the Hudson Cannabis facility.
“Evidence supports that ingredients used in product are not allowed to be used in cannabis products,” said the quarantine order signed by inspectors Natalie DeLong and Matthew Hinken.
The order said the mixed ingredients “may jeopardize public health or safety.”
The company marketing 1906, which has been sold in seven states including New York, is appealing the ruling banning the sale of $1 million of its inventory in New York.
“Hudson Cannabis and our production facilities fully follow New York State’s cannabis regulations,” said Melany Dobson, co-founder of Hudson Cannabis, in a statement to The Post on Sunday.
“We are surprised by this decision from the State to quarantine products that have been on the market for over 18 months, are sold legally in States across the nation, and as far as we know have had zero reported adverse effects.
“This type of arbitrary and capricious behavior, preventing the sale of safe and tested products readily available across the country, only serves to benefit the illicit market Governor Hochul claims to care about shutting down,” Dobson said.
A lawyer for 1906’s parent firm Nuka Enterprises, Matthew Schweber, said OCM cited what he described as a wacky decaffeination rule that forbids infusing pure caffeine into cannabis products but allows “naturally occurring caffeine.”
The rule states, “A processor is prohibited from processing any products which… contain any non-phytocannabinoid ingredient that would increase potency, toxicity, or addictive potential, or that would create an unsafe combination, known or unknown, with other psychoactive substances. This prohibition shall not apply to products containing naturally occurring caffeine, such as coffee, tea, or chocolate.”
OCM claims that caffeine increases “potency, toxicity, or addictive potential or… create(s) an unsafe combination [with cannabinoids],” Schweber said.
“But OCM can’t say which prohibition exactly caffeine triggers? Does caffeine increase cannabis’ ‘potency?’ Does it increase its ‘toxicity’ or its ‘addictive potential?’ Does it create ‘an unsafe combination?’ ” Schweber said.
“They can’t say. Do they have documented evidence of any of the dangers of combining caffeine and cannabis? No, of course not,” the lawyer said.
Schweber said the “crazy” part is that state regulators don’t explain why “naturally occurring caffeine” is OK but added caffeine is not.