Cannabis News

Banned from Smoking Weed in His Own Home

Published

1 year ago

June 19, 2023

admin

banned from smoking in his own home

This is the story of Tom. Tom suffered from chronic pain for years, enduring countless surgeries and seeking relief in various forms. Finally, he gathered the courage to pursue a medical marijuana license, and it changed his life. He found solace in cannabis, as it alleviated his pain and allowed him to regain a sense of normalcy. For the first time in years, Tom experienced a life without constant suffering.

However, as Tom went about his daily life, embracing the newfound relief provided by medical marijuana, a knock on his door brought his world crashing down. He had been served with a lawsuit, filed by his neighbor who claimed that the years of breathing in Tom’s marijuana smoke had harmed her health. Unbeknownst to him, his own home had become a battleground, pitting his medical needs against his neighbor’s concerns.

This isn’t fiction – this really happened, and should concern every cannabis smoker in the US.

In a recent case in Washington D.C., a court ruled that a man, Thomas Cackett, is forbidden from smoking cannabis inside his home after his neighbor, Josefa Ippolito-Shepherd, sued him. Ippolito-Shepherd argued that the marijuana smoke from Cackett’s residence seeped into her home, causing severe health issues. The court ordered Cackett to refrain from smoking cannabis inside his home, under the risk of being held in contempt of court.

While Cackett testified that he relied on cannabis for pain relief and expressed empathy for his neighbor, the judge ruled in favor of Ippolito-Shepherd, citing the need to protect a neighboring homeowner’s right to the full use and enjoyment of their property. The court decision could still be appealed.

The case raises important questions about the rights of cannabis users and their neighbors, as well as the challenges that arise when conflicting interests clash.

“Experts in secondhand smoke” emphasized the porous nature of shared walls, floors, and ceilings in multi-unit dwellings, stating that cannabis smoke can permeate more extensively than tobacco smoke. They noted that while tobacco smoke may cause headaches and irritations, marijuana smoke can also result in getting high for non-smokers.

Advocates for cannabis legalization, such as Adam Eidinger, see this case as a call to action to establish outdoor public smoking areas, where individuals can consume cannabis without impacting their neighbors. However, critics argue that finding a balance between individual freedoms and the well-being of others is essential.

As with these kinds of stories, I’m going to provide the old “Reginald Perspective” that will highlight some of the absurdities of the claims by these so called “secondhand smoke experts”, and why this case needs to be appealed – and if Tom doesn’t have the money, the cannabis community needs to reach out and pitch in.

Before we continue to discuss the importance of this case – we must first talk about the alleged claims that were made by “secondhand smoke experts” regarding the permeability of cannabis smoke through shared walls, floors, and ceilings in multi-unit dwellings. Additionally, it was suggested that non-smokers exposed to secondhand cannabis smoke can get high. It is essential to critically evaluate these assertions and rely on scientific evidence to provide accurate information on these topics.

And that’s precisely what we’re going to do.

Evaluating Permeability of Cannabis Smoke:

The claim that cannabis smoke can permeate extensively through porous materials such as walls, floors, and ceilings requires careful examination. One cannot simply say things to win court cases, it must be founded in science and reason.

Several scientific studies have investigated the behavior of smoke particles, including those from cannabis, in indoor environments. Notably, the permeability of cannabis smoke is influenced by factors such as particle size, ventilation, and filtration systems.

A study published in the Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association in 2019 examined the transport of particulate matter, including cannabis smoke, in residential buildings. The researchers concluded that while particles from tobacco smoke can travel through shared ventilation systems, the extent of particle migration is limited and does not necessarily result in significant exposure in neighboring units. This study challenges the notion of extensive permeation of cannabis smoke through shared structures.

Furthermore, a study published in the journal Aerosol Science and Technology in 2013 investigated the penetration of smoke particles through materials commonly found in homes, such as gypsum wallboard and plywood. The researchers found that larger particles, such as those present in cannabis smoke, exhibited limited penetration through these materials. These findings suggest that the claim of extensive permeability is not supported by scientific evidence.

It means that those experts are not what they claim because it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out how weak that argument really was.

Addressing the “Getting High” Claim:

Another assertion made was that non-smokers exposed to secondhand cannabis smoke can experience psychoactive effects and get high.

However, the psychoactive effects of cannabis are primarily attributed to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive compound in the plant. It is important to understand that the concentration of THC in secondhand cannabis smoke is significantly lower than in directly inhaled smoke. Especially if it was “filtered through a wall” as claimed by the experts.

A study published in the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence in 2010 examined the effects of secondhand cannabis smoke exposure in non-smokers.

The study found that exposure to realistic levels of secondhand cannabis smoke did not result in detectable levels of THC in the blood, suggesting that non-smokers are unlikely to experience psychoactive effects or get high from secondhand exposure. These findings contradict the claim that non-smokers can get high from secondhand cannabis smoke.

However, it’s important to note that people can get high from smoking a non-psychoactive material when they are deceived into believing that it is a psychoactive material. In other words, they can be “placebo-ed” into thinking they are high.

Now, I’m not claiming that the plaintiff in the afore mentioned case was not affected by the odor of her neighbor, but it’s hard to believe that she got the “dizziness” she claims she got from the plant. Rather, it seems like psychosomatic suggestion as a result of decades of programming by her pals “The US Government”.

To further explore why the plaintiff is self-suggesting her “health side effects” we’ll compare the smoke density and material density of buildings.

Comparing Smoke Density and Material Density:

To provide a better understanding of the physical properties involved, it is important to compare the density of cannabis smoke with that of typical building materials.

Cannabis smoke consists of tiny particles suspended in the air, while walls, floors, and ceilings are composed of dense materials. The density difference between smoke particles and building materials impedes the ability of smoke to permeate through solid surfaces significantly.

Additionally, the presence of smoke filtration systems, such as HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) systems equipped with appropriate filters, can further minimize the movement of smoke particles between different units. These systems effectively capture and remove airborne particles, reducing the potential for smoke migration.

We don’t know for sure if the defendant in the case had any of these elements on, however, this wasn’t even considered in the case. The mere fact that the logic of these alleged experts weren’t challenged makes me think that Tom nor his lawyers expected a court to rule against banning someone from smoking in their own home as this opens up a whole bag of constitutional issues.

The Possible implications of this ruling

Banning someone from smoking cannabis in their own home can have significant implications for cannabis consumers and potentially encroach upon their constitutional rights.

The case described in the article, where a court ordered a D.C. resident to cease smoking cannabis inside his home due to a neighbor’s complaint, raises concerns regarding individual privacy, personal autonomy, and the broader implications for cannabis legalization.

The right to privacy is a fundamental aspect of individual liberty protected by the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court has recognized this right as encompassing personal choices made within the confines of one’s home. By prohibiting individuals from consuming cannabis in their private residences, a precedent is set that potentially infringes upon this constitutional protection.

It sets a worrisome precedent where personal preferences and choices are subjected to the scrutiny and control of neighbors and the legal system.

Moreover, such bans can undermine the progress made in cannabis legalization efforts.

As more states and jurisdictions move towards decriminalization and legalization, it is essential to establish frameworks that respect individual rights and the autonomy of consumers. Imposing restrictions on the use of cannabis within private homes can undermine the intent and purpose of these laws, limiting the ability of individuals to fully exercise their rights within the confines of their own property.

Additionally, singling out cannabis consumers for restrictions not imposed on individuals who engage in legal activities raises questions about equity and fairness.

It creates a disproportionate burden on individuals who rely on cannabis for medical purposes or as a legal recreational substance. This selective targeting of cannabis users potentially violates principles of equal protection under the law, treating them differently from individuals engaged in other lawful activities within their homes. If there’s no ban on smoking tobacco, then this is singling out a specific group of people under the law…

To ensure a fair and balanced approach, regulations regarding cannabis consumption should be carefully crafted, respecting the rights of individuals while addressing valid concerns related to public health and nuisance. Striking a balance between individual rights and community interests is crucial in navigating the complexities of cannabis legalization and preventing the erosion of constitutional rights.

This is why this is an important story for cannabis consumers and I urge any lawyers or groups to rally together and fight this in the courts. We need to etch out our space within the community and while it might be inconvenient for some that people have a right to consume on their own homes/properties – then so be it.

The fact of the matter is that we’re talking about fundamental rights here…so let’s not let non-consumers shape the law according to their wills.

Cannabis News

Trump 2.0 Cannabis Reform? – What to Expect When Republicans Control Washington

Published

14 hours ago

November 9, 2024

admin

Trumps plans for marijuana legalization

In a turn of events that will reshape America’s cannabis policy landscape, Donald Trump has secured a second term as president, with Republicans gaining control of both chambers of Congress. This new political reality presents an unexpected opportunity for cannabis reform, albeit through a different lens than many advocates might have expected.

Trump’s evolution on cannabis policy has been remarkable. From his 1990s stance advocating for complete drug legalization to his recent endorsement of Florida’s cannabis initiative, his positions reflect a pragmatic adaptation to changing times. While his campaign rhetoric about drug dealers and cartels raised eyebrows, it’s crucial to understand that these comments targeted fentanyl traffickers, not the cannabis industry.

What makes this moment particularly intriguing is Trump’s recent cannabis policy declarations, coupled with his potential appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as health czar. This combination, along with unified Republican control of Congress, could create an unprecedented opportunity for federal cannabis reform – though perhaps not in the way many industry observers anticipated.

The landscape before us isn’t about aggressive federal legalization or social equity programs. Instead, we’re looking at the potential for a streamlined, business-friendly approach to cannabis reform that could actually succeed where previous attempts have failed. With Republicans controlling all levers of power, we might finally see a pragmatic path forward that prioritizes states’ rights, banking access, and basic federal frameworks over more controversial social programs.

As we unpack what cannabis reform might look like under Trump’s second term, it’s important to understand that the Republican Party of 2024 isn’t necessarily the anti-cannabis force it once was. In fact, with the right approach, this could be the breakthrough moment the industry has been waiting for.

Trump’s approach to cannabis policy has crystallized into something both pragmatic and distinctly Republican. His recent endorsement of Florida’s legalization initiative, though it ultimately fell short of the required 60% threshold, signals a significant shift in conservative cannabis politics. “Someone should not be a criminal in Florida, when this is legal in so many other States,” Trump declared, capturing the growing Republican sentiment that criminalization of cannabis may no longer serve conservative interests.

What’s particularly noteworthy about Trump’s current stance is his three-pronged approach to reform. First, he’s committed to continuing the Biden administration’s push to reschedule cannabis to Schedule III, but with a crucial difference – he’s indicated this would be part of a broader strategy to unlock medical research rather than an end goal. Second, he’s voiced strong support for banking reform, which could finally resolve the industry’s financial access problems. Third, and perhaps most importantly, he’s maintained his commitment to states’ rights, allowing local markets to develop organically without federal interference.

The potential appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as health czar could be a game-changer for cannabis policy. Kennedy has been a vocal critic of pharmaceutical industry influence and supports comprehensive drug policy reform. Having him oversee agencies like the FDA, NIH, and other health organizations could lead to significant changes in how these bodies approach cannabis research and regulation. His presence could help dismantle some of the institutional barriers that have historically limited cannabis research and development.

Trump’s administration has also indicated a willingness to work with Congress on “common sense laws” regarding cannabis. This suggests a shift away from executive action toward legislative solutions – a approach that could prove more durable than administrative rescheduling. While this might seem slower than executive action, it actually addresses the fundamental legal issues that have plagued cannabis reform efforts.

What’s particularly interesting about Trump’s current position is how it differs from his first term. While his previous administration included anti-cannabis figures like Jeff Sessions, Trump’s second term team appears to be stacked with more reform-friendly voices. This isn’t just about RFK Jr. – there are indications that other key appointments could favor a more progressive approach to cannabis policy, albeit through a conservative lens.

What many cannabis advocates fail to understand is that Republican opposition to cannabis reform has never been about the plant itself – it’s been about how legalization is implemented. The GOP’s resistance to previous reform efforts has largely centered on their rejection of social equity programs and heavy-handed federal oversight rather than opposition to legalization itself.

This Republican-controlled Congress presents a unique opportunity for what we might call “clean” cannabis reform – a barebones federal framework that addresses core business issues without the additional layers of social programming that have traditionally stalled legislation. Think of it as Cannabis Reform 2.0: streamlined, business-focused, and built on conservative principles of free market economics and states’ rights.

Such a framework could include several key elements that Republicans have historically supported. First, a straightforward licensing scheme that emphasizes merit-based approval rather than demographic quotas. Second, comprehensive banking reform that would allow cannabis businesses to access financial services without jumping through extraordinary hoops. Third, interstate commerce provisions that would allow states with legal markets to trade with each other, creating a more efficient national market.

What makes this approach particularly viable is its alignment with core Republican values. By focusing on reducing government interference, promoting business growth, and respecting state sovereignty, such legislation could attract broad GOP support. It’s worth noting that many Republican legislators who have opposed previous cannabis bills have specifically cited issues with equity provisions and federal overreach, not with legalization itself.

Moreover, the economic arguments for cannabis reform resonate strongly with Republican fiscal priorities. The potential tax revenue, job creation, and economic growth from a properly regulated cannabis industry align perfectly with conservative economic objectives. By framing cannabis reform as an economic opportunity rather than a social justice initiative, Republicans could actually move faster on legalization than their Democratic counterparts.

This reality creates an interesting paradox: under unified Republican control, we might actually see more substantive cannabis reform than under divided government, albeit in a different form than many advocates originally envisioned. The key is understanding that Republican support for cannabis reform exists – it just needs to be packaged in a way that aligns with conservative principles.

The path to cannabis reform under a Republican-controlled government might actually bypass the bureaucratic quagmire of DEA rescheduling altogether. While the DEA continues to delay hearings until 2025 and beyond, Congress could take direct action to create a new federal framework for cannabis regulation that renders the scheduling debate moot.

This isn’t just theoretical – there’s historical precedent for Congress creating separate regulatory frameworks for controlled substances. Take alcohol, for example. Rather than trying to reschedule or deschedule alcohol within the Controlled Substances Act, Congress established distinct regulations for its production, distribution, and sale. A similar approach could work for cannabis, creating a clean slate without the baggage of decades-old drug war policies.

Under Trump’s second term, with Republican control of Congress, we could see legislation that:

Removes cannabis from the Controlled Substances Act entirely

Creates a streamlined federal regulatory framework similar to alcohol

Establishes clear banking and financial service guidelines

Enables interstate commerce between legal states

Protects state-level markets from federal interference

Streamlines research permissions and protocols

The key players in making this happen extend beyond Trump himself. RFK Jr.’s potential oversight of health agencies could dramatically reshape how we approach cannabis research and medical applications. The appointment of business-friendly regulators could help create practical frameworks that promote industry growth while maintaining necessary safeguards.

States would continue to serve as laboratories of democracy, maintaining their own regulatory systems while operating within a permissive federal framework. This approach aligns perfectly with traditional Republican values of federalism and states’ rights.

The timing could actually be perfect. With 38 states having some form of legal cannabis market and more coming online each year, the pressure for federal reform has never been greater. The cannabis industry has also matured significantly, developing sophisticated business practices and safety protocols that could inform federal policy.

Republicans might also see this as an opportunity to put their stamp on cannabis policy before changing demographics potentially shift control back to Democrats in future elections. By acting now, they could shape the industry’s future in ways that align with conservative principles while claiming credit for ending federal prohibition.

The Sticky Bottom Line

As we look ahead to Trump’s second term, it’s clear that cannabis reform could take a dramatically different path than many expected. While some industry advocates might mourn the loss of social equity programs or comprehensive federal oversight, the reality is that a streamlined, Republican-led approach to legalization might actually achieve what years of progressive efforts couldn’t: ending federal cannabis prohibition.

The key to success will be embracing pragmatism over idealism. A “perfect” cannabis bill that includes everything on every advocate’s wishlist has repeatedly failed to gain traction. But a focused bill that addresses core business issues – banking, interstate commerce, and basic federal frameworks – while respecting state sovereignty could find broad Republican support.

Trump’s potential administration, particularly with RFK Jr. at the health policy helm, suggests a unique opportunity to reshape federal cannabis policy. By focusing on research, reducing pharmaceutical industry influence, and promoting business development, this approach could create a more sustainable and dynamic cannabis industry than heavy-handed federal regulation would allow.

For industry stakeholders, this means adapting strategies and expectations. Rather than pushing for comprehensive reform packages, success might come from supporting targeted legislation that addresses specific issues. The cannabis industry has matured enough to operate effectively within a basic federal framework, much like the alcohol industry does.

We’re potentially standing at the threshold of cannabis liberation, just not in the way many envisioned. Rather than top-down federal control, we might see a more organic, market-driven approach to industry development. While this might seem like a compromise to some advocates, it could ultimately prove more effective at achieving the core goal: ending federal cannabis prohibition and allowing the industry to flourish.

The next few years will be crucial. With Republicans controlling all branches of government and Trump showing unprecedented support for cannabis reform, we have a unique window of opportunity. Success will depend on the industry’s ability to work within this new political reality and support practical, achievable reforms rather than holding out for perfect but unattainable solutions.

The path to cannabis liberation might not look exactly as we imagined, but it’s becoming increasingly clear. Sometimes, the best way forward isn’t the most obvious one, and in this case, conservative pragmatism might accomplish what progressive idealism couldn’t: finally ending federal cannabis prohibition in America.

TRUMP PROMISED NEW JOBS, SO WHY NOT WEED, READ ON…

TRUMP PROMISED NEW JOBS, WHAT COULD LEGAL WEED DO?

Source link

Cannabis News

Wait, Can TSA Now Stop You for Cannabis in Your Luggage?

Published

2 days ago

November 8, 2024

admin

tsa weed checks in bags

Can TSA stop you if you have weed in your bag?

With the election over and Republicans getting a clean sweep across much of the board in America, is it safe to travel on an airplane with weed, now? Traveling with cannabis can be a daunting experience, especially given the complex web of state and federal laws governing its use and possession. As more states legalize marijuana for recreational and medicinal purposes, many travelers find themselves asking: **Can the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) stop you for cannabis in your luggage?** This comprehensive guide will explore TSA policies regarding cannabis, the implications of federal law, and practical advice for travelers to navigate this evolving landscape.

The Legal Landscape of Cannabis in the United States

Federal Law

At the federal level, cannabis is classified as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act. This classification indicates that marijuana is considered to have a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. Consequently, possession, distribution, or cultivation of marijuana remains illegal across the United States, regardless of state laws.

In December 2018, the U.S. Congress passed the **Farm Bill**, which legalized hemp-derived products containing less than 0.3% THC (the psychoactive component of cannabis). This legislation opened the door for the legal sale and transportation of certain hemp-derived products, such as CBD oil. However, it did not change the legal status of marijuana itself.

State Laws

In contrast to federal law, many states have enacted their own laws regarding cannabis use. As of now, over 30 states have legalized marijuana for medical use, and several have also legalized it for recreational use. Each state has its own regulations governing possession limits, usage locations, and age restrictions. Here are some key points to consider:

Recreational Use: States like California, Colorado, and Oregon allow adults over 21 to possess and use cannabis legally.

Medical Use: Many states require patients to obtain a medical marijuana card to access cannabis products legally.

Decriminalization: Some states have decriminalized possession of small amounts of cannabis, meaning that while it remains illegal, penalties are reduced.

The Patchwork of State Laws

The disparity between state and federal laws creates a patchwork legal environment that can be confusing for travelers. For instance:

A traveler may legally purchase cannabis in California but face legal repercussions if they attempt to bring it into a state where it remains illegal.

Even in states where cannabis is legal, local jurisdictions may impose additional restrictions or penalties.

TSA Policies Regarding Cannabis

TSA’s Primary Mission

The primary mission of the TSA is to ensure the safety and security of air travel. Their focus is on preventing dangerous items from being brought onto airplanes—such as weapons or explosives—rather than enforcing drug laws. This means that while TSA officers may encounter cannabis during security screenings, they are not actively searching for it.

What Happens If TSA Finds Cannabis?

If TSA officers discover cannabis during a security screening, they follow specific protocols:

1. Confiscation: The TSA will typically confiscate any cannabis products found in your luggage.

2. Notification of Law Enforcement: TSA officers may notify local law enforcement if they find marijuana in your luggage. What happens next depends on local laws regarding cannabis possession.

The Role of Local Law Enforcement

When local law enforcement gets involved after TSA confiscates cannabis:

Legal Consequences: Depending on the amount found and local laws, you may face fines or other penalties.

Discretionary Enforcement: In some areas where cannabis is legal or decriminalized, law enforcement may choose not to pursue charges against individuals found with small amounts.

What You Can Bring: Understanding Limits

Under the 2018 Farm Bill, hemp-derived products containing less than 0.3% THC are legal federally. This means that items such as CBD oil made from hemp can be transported legally through airports. However, it’s essential to carry documentation proving that the product contains less than 0.3% THC to avoid issues at security checkpoints.

Tips for Traveling with Hemp-Derived Products

1. Documentation: Always carry a certificate of analysis (COA) from a reputable lab showing that your product meets federal guidelines.

2. Proper Packaging: Keep hemp-derived products in their original packaging to avoid any confusion during security checks.

3. Know Your Product: Be aware of the THC content in your product; if it exceeds 0.3%, it could be considered illegal under federal law.

Medical Marijuana

If you are traveling with medical marijuana, understanding both your departure and arrival states’ laws is crucial:

1. Check Local Laws: Some states allow medical marijuana patients to carry their medication across state lines; others do not.

2. Documentation: Always carry your medical marijuana card and any prescriptions to avoid complications at security checkpoints.

Considerations for Medical Marijuana Users

Quantity Limits: Be aware of how much medical marijuana you are allowed to carry according to your home state’s regulations.

State Reciprocity: Some states recognize out-of-state medical marijuana cards; check if your destination state has this provision.

Traveling by Air: If flying from a legal state to another legal state but through a non-legal state, consider alternative routes or transportation methods.

Navigating Airports with Cannabis

Security Screening Procedures

When you arrive at an airport with cannabis or hemp-derived products:

1. Prepare for Screening: Place all items in your carry-on bag for easier inspection.

2. Be Honest: If questioned by TSA officers about any items in your bag, be honest about what you’re carrying.

3. Stay Calm: If TSA finds cannabis during screening, remain calm and cooperative; panicking can escalate the situation unnecessarily.

Airport Policies on Cannabis

While TSA is responsible for security screenings, individual airports may have their own policies regarding cannabis:

Some airports in legal states have designated areas where travelers can consume cannabis legally before boarding their flights.

Other airports may have strict policies against any form of cannabis possession due to local laws.

Tips for Travelers

To ensure a smooth travel experience when it comes to cannabis, consider these tips:

1. Know Your Destination’s Laws: Research both your departure and arrival locations’ laws regarding cannabis possession and use.

2. Local Regulations: Understand any local regulations that may differ from state laws; some cities have stricter rules than their respective states.

If possible, refrain from bringing cannabis on your travels altogether:

Purchase it legally at your destination if allowed.

Consider using delivery services available in some legal states that can bring products directly to your accommodation.

If you must travel with cannabis or hemp-derived products:

1. Keep It Discreetly Packed: Store products discreetly within your luggage to avoid drawing attention during screenings.

2. Stay Within Legal Limits: Adhere strictly to possession limits set by both your home state and destination state.

Understand Risks Involved

Be aware that even if you are traveling from a legal state to another legal state:

1. Federal Law Applies in Airports: Federal law governs airports; possessing marijuana can lead to serious consequences regardless of state legality.

2. Potential Legal Issues: Be prepared for potential legal issues if stopped by law enforcement.

Real-Life Scenarios and Experiences

Understanding how TSA policies play out in real-life scenarios can provide valuable insights for travelers:

Scenario 1: Traveling from California to Colorado

A traveler leaves California (a legal state) with an ounce of recreational marijuana intended for personal use while visiting Colorado (another legal state). At LAX airport security.

The traveler places their bag on the conveyor belt without any concern since both states allow recreational use. TSA discovers the marijuana during screening; they confiscate it but do not involve law enforcement due to California’s legalization status.

In this case, although both states allow recreational use, the traveler faced no penalties because they were compliant with California’s regulations when departing.

Scenario 2: Traveling from New York to Texas

A medical marijuana patient travels from New York (where medical use is permitted) to Texas (where possession remains illegal). The patient carries their prescribed quantity along with documentation Upon arriving at an airport in Texas, TSA discovers the medical marijuana during screening. Local authorities are notified due to Texas’s strict laws against possession; the traveler faces potential charges despite having valid documentation from New York.

This scenario illustrates how traveling between states with differing laws can lead to serious consequences despite having valid medical documentation.

Conclusion

TSA does not actively seek out cannabis during security screenings, they will confiscate any found and may report it to local authorities. The legality of traveling with cannabis depends heavily on state laws and federal regulations making it essential for travelers to stay informed about both sets of rules before embarking on their journey.

By understanding these guidelines and taking proactive steps such as researching destination laws and considering alternative options travelers can navigate their travel plans confidently and minimize risks associated with carrying cannabis through airports. As societal attitudes toward cannabis continue to evolve alongside changing legislation across various jurisdictions, staying informed will remain crucial for anyone looking to travel with this increasingly popular substance safely and legally.

TSA ALLOWES CANNABIS-BASED MEDICINES NOW? READ ON…

CANNABIS BASED MEDICINES ALLOWED ON PLANES NOW!

Source link

Cannabis News

Why Weed is the Best Thing That’s Happened to Endometrosis Patients in the Last 50 Years

Published

3 days ago

November 6, 2024

admin

cannabis for endometriosis

Endometriosis is one of the most pain conditions affecting women worldwide.

When endometriosis occurs, the endometrial tissue which normally grows inside the uterus, grows outside of it. As a result, it can attach itself to other reproductive organs in the area. In extreme cases, endometriosis can reach far beyond the reproductive area and cause serious pain and damage. The symptoms of endometriosis include sharp period pains, fatigue, pain during sex, infertility, heavy periods, and much more.

According to the World Health Organization, around 10% of women who are in reproductive age, have endometriosis. Unfortunately, there is no known cure, though several protocols can be integrated into a patient’s lifestyle to mitigate or reduce symptoms. Some common medications used for reducing the symptoms of endometriosis include birth control pills, hormonal injections, patches, and intra-uterine devices (IUD), to name a few. However, these may affect a woman’s chances of getting pregnant, or make infertility even worse since endometriosis can also affect fertility.

Thankfully, more women are finding success with lifestyle changes and integrating natural treatments to treat endometriosis. Along with regular exercise, weight loss among overweight women, and healthy habits, cannabis has been shown to be helpful treating this dreaded disease.

What Studies Are Saying

There are more studies than ever, too, proving the efficacy and benefits of cannabis for women suffering from endometriosis. In a recent study out of Germany, researchers analyzed survey data from more than 900 endometriosis patients to determine how, if any, the symptoms are impacted by cannabis.

A significant percentage of the 900 respondents acknowledged using marijuana, and most of them said that it was beneficial in helping with symptoms. “Seventeen percent of the respondents used cannabis flower strains or cannabis-related products as a self-management method,” said the researchers. “Cannabis was rated as the most effective self-management strategy to reduce symptom intensity (self-rated efficacy 7.6 out of 10). Additionally, ~90 percent of the participants were able to decrease the pain medication intake,” explained the researchers. They also noted that the participants observed the most significant benefits from cannabis in their sleep, menstrual pain, and non-cyclic pain in that order. Because of this, it’s become clear that cannabis can greatly help improve quality of life in these areas, which are otherwise affected by symptoms of endometriosis.

It’s important to note that the investigators also acknowledge that existing studies on cannabis for endometriosis is limited, yet there is an increasing quantity of studies pointing to a growing trend of women self-medicating with cannabis for this condition, and seeing success!

“The use of cannabis has a significant impact on the overall well-being and quality of life of women with endometriosis,” they concluded. “The study indicates that there is a significant interest and demand for additional therapeutic options, and cannabis can potentially become an important part of a multimodal therapy approach for treating endometriosis,” said the study.

Another study from Australia, whose results were published earlier this year, found similar results. The data, which was published in the journal, Obstetrics and Gynecology, were taken from 192 women who were polled by Australian researchers regarding their history of marijuana consumption and endometriosis symptoms.

According to the findings, 63% of the poll respondents were given doctor’s authorization letters for using cannabis-based medications. In Australia, physicians are legally allowed to recommend cannabis use for patients who have had no luck treating specific conditions using conventional prescription drugs. In the study, most women were using THC-dominant marijuana products and they reported improvements when it came to sleep, pain, nausea, and anxiety.

“This study found that THC-predominant CBMPs [cannabis-based medicinal products] are commonly prescribed to Australians with endometriosis,” said the authors. “Given major issues with symptom management and the self-reported reductions in pain and other symptoms, improving access to medicinal cannabis for this population is important and timely,” they said.

Why Cannabis Works So Well For Endometriosis

These studies and tons of anecdotal evidence available on the internet show that cannabis is indeed safe and effective for treating endometriosis. After all, cannabis interacts with the endocannabinoid system (ECS), which plays an important role in helping us regulate pain, inflammation, and our immune response – all of which are impacted by endometriosis.

While there are many symptoms that cannabis can help with, one of its greatest successes has been in reducing pain. Women have found success using both high-CBD and high-THC products to reduce the severe pain that accompanies endometriosis. Likewise, the pain, discomfort, and cramping can make it difficult to get some decent sleep; marijuana can help with that too!

In addition, marijuana can help women’s bodies balance out hormones, since the endocannabinoid system also plays a role in hormone regulation.

Furthermore, women can choose from a variety of products to help treat endometriosis. While smoking or vaping is always a popular choice, there ae also edibles, topical creams, oils, beverages, and tinctures.

Conclusion

When looking to treat endometriosis, remember that there is no miracle cure out there. Marijuana certainly helps, but it’s not a one-size fits-all approach. Please remember to consult with a medical professional, and keep in mind that you will always have the best results if you also address other lifestyle factors as mentioned earlier.

Maintaining a healthy weight, avoiding processed and sugary food, and regular exercise are all key factors to mitigating the symptoms of endometriosis. Add cannabis to the mix, and you can now look forward to regaining a better quality of life.