Connect with us

Cannabis News

Chair Of Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission Steps Down

Published

on

“Nebraska should take the opportunity to be slow and deliberate in deciding how to designate the appropriate conditions for medical cannabis.”

Zach Wendling, Nebraska Examiner

The chairman of the Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission resigned Monday, about nine months after being appointed to the position by Gov. Jim Pillen (R).

Pillen appointed Dr. Monica Oldenburg of Lincoln, an anesthesiologist, to the board on April 24, as one of two members. They serve with three members of the Nebraska Liquor Control Commission. Beyond a brief statement announcing his resignation, commissioners did not address Oldenburg’s tenure.

Members of Parliament confirmed Oldenburg’s position on May 30, in a 34-11 vote. He told MPs that he was not a “prohibitionist” of cannabis, but was “pro-research”. Oldenburg also said cannabis has “a place in pain management” for certain ailments that cause suffering.

“Nebraska needs to seize the opportunity to be slow and deliberate in the way it decides what the appropriate conditions are for medical cannabis and how it regulates the entities that will provide medical cannabis in our state,” Oldenburg said last May. “I look forward to working with multiple parties to make sure we get this right in the state of Nebraska.”

At the same hearing last year, Oldenburg said he was encouraged to apply by state Sen. Jared Storm of David City, a member of the Legislature’s General Affairs Committee, which considered his nomination.

Oldenburg was not present at his board’s monthly meetings in December or January.

Pillen’s office had no immediate comment and did not immediately make a copy of Oldenburg’s resignation available.

Oldenburg’s leadership guided commissioners through strict regulations to prevent future licensed dispensaries from selling medical cannabis that could be smoked or vaporized. The regulations would also require that patients be able to access licensed dispensaries if they obtain referrals from health care professionals who enroll in the program.

Patients and advocates have criticized the regulations, saying the 2024 ballot measure specifically allows for the smoking and vaping of cannabis and does not give the commission authority over patients.

In Oldenburg’s absence, the remaining four members voted unanimously to name commissioner Lorelle Mueting of Gretna as “interim” president. Mueting, director of prevention at Heartland Family Service in Omaha, was confirmed along with Oldenburg in a 27-16 vote.

Oldenburg and Mueting faced fierce opposition to their nominations, as both advocates opposed the 2018-25 medical cannabis bill.

Pillen last year described the women as “experienced and qualified individuals” who would ensure strong rules “under the law established by the people of Nebraska.”

Since July, Pillen has appointed all three members of the Liquor Control Commission. They will face legislative confirmation this spring, as will Oldenburg’s successor, if Pillen appoints him.

This story was first published by the Nebraska Examiner.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Maximizing cannabis yields with intercanopy and subcanopy lighting

Published

on

By







Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Transportation Groups Warn Feds Of Marijuana Rescheduling’s ‘Consequences’ For Drug Testing Of Truck Drivers And Pilots

Published

on

By

A coalition of transportation and safety organizations said they have “serious safety concerns” about the Trump administration’s move to federally regulate marijuana.

Led by the American Trucking Association, the groups sent a letter to federal officials Monday asking them to take steps to ensure truck drivers, pilots, transit operators and other safety-sensitive workers continue to be tested for cannabis.

“If employers do not take the necessary steps to preserve the ability of security-sensitive transportation workers to test for marijuana, this change could have significant consequences for the safety of passengers and the entire transportation industry,” wrote Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, and Transportation Secretary J.

The organizations said they understand that federal officials are being “urgently” reorganized under an executive order from President Donald Trump, that they are “deeply concerned that the current process does not adequately take into account agencies responsible for transportation safety or protecting the traveling public” and that they want the agencies to “work together.” ongoing cannabis redistricting hearings and rulemaking process to address these concerns.

In May, the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued new guidelines saying just that Truck drivers, airline pilots and other safety-sensitive workers still cannot use medical marijuana without penalty despite the Trump administration’s move to reschedule.

“Marijuana use is incompatible with safety-sensitive functions,” the department said.

Medical review officers (MROs) who receive drug test results indicating cannabis use cannot rule them out as negative for illegal substance use, even if an employee claims it was a result of state-licensed medical marijuana.

“Currently, there is no way for an MRO to verify that a laboratory-confirmed marijuana drug test result is positive when an employee claims the positive was caused by a state-licensed marijuana product,” the DOT said, explaining that after the reprogramming, medical marijuana dispensed under state law “does not” constitute a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The transportation groups said in the new letter that the DOT’s drug-testing program “is in accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs and HHS-certified laboratories.”

“While DOT has expressed its intention to continue testing marijuana, a commitment we greatly appreciate, it is unclear whether DOT will retain its ability to rely on HHS procedures and certifications after the rescheduling,” they wrote. “Without this alignment, DOT may retain the authority to conduct testing, but lack the scientific and procedural infrastructure to do so.”

“Practically, this would mean that truck and bus drivers, pilots, flight attendants, air traffic controllers, air mechanics, railroad workers, dispatchers and signal workers, transit operators and pipeline workers could continue to perform high-risk safety roles without a reliable means of verifying that they are not actively using marijuana. It relies on controlled substance testing to identify end use and prevent potentially impaired individuals from fulfilling their safety-related obligations. While the planning could create legal or regulatory loopholes, the regulated employer-based drug testing agency warned that the final rules should not jeopardize marijuana testing for safety-sensitive transportation workers.”

“Regardless of the broader policy goals of the review, the federal government should not move forward to preserve transportation drug testing programs and mitigate the risks of increased and unchecked deterioration of our roads, railroads, public transportation systems, pipelines, airspace, and maritime corridors,” the letter says.

The organizations specifically ask federal officials to:

  • Support long-term marijuana testing for all safety-sensitive transportation workers;
  • Confirm the authority of DOT-regulated employers to perform such tests;
  • Ensure HHS laboratory certification and testing guidelines remain available and aligned with DOT’s safety mission; and
  • Establish a coordinated federal strategy to address the transportation security implications of rescheduling.

“The public and the workers who keep our transportation system running safely deserve a process that ensures these safeguards are firmly in place before any final action is taken,” he said. the letter he says

Earlier this month, the House Appropriations Committee approved a provision to allow federal officials to continue requiring government employees and security-sensitive employees, such as truck drivers and airline pilots must be drug tested for marijuana, “regardless of any future change in legal status or schedule.”

This was followed by a press conference organized by prohibitionist groups and a drug-testing industry association, where both Republican lawmakers joined the proclamation. “Cut” to marijuana rescheduling by asserting that safety-sensitive transportation workers can still be punished for testing positive for THC.

Legislators and abolitionist activists argued that moving marijuana to Schedule III would lead to a 1986 executive order signed by President Ronald Reagan defining illegal drugs under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in relation to the use of cannabis by truck drivers and other airline employees.

Last October, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy suggested that President Donald Trump was “putting pressure” on rescheduling cannabis.arguing that marijuana is “truly addictive” and that policy reform on the issue sends a “dangerous” message.

“At a time when the culture is encouraging and celebrating the use of marijuana, we’re not talking about risk,” Duffy said.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Experts say THC percentage is the wrong way to shop for cannabis

Published

on

By


Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media