Entomotic distributors are standardizing and streamlining the introduction of beneficial organisms into crops, helping to optimize biological performance. By using tank mixing, one or more beneficials can be applied simultaneously, thereby increasing operational efficiency.

With the Entomatic dispenser, growers can standardize and industrialize the introduction of beneficial organisms into their crops. Tank mixes can apply one or more beneficials at the same time, improving biological performance, increasing operational efficiency.

The success of biological control programs depends not only on the quality of the beneficial organisms, but also on how accurately and evenly they are introduced into the crop. Traditional manual application methods often result in uneven distribution, inconsistent release rates and significant labor requirements – limiting implementation and reducing overall control effectiveness.

Effective detailed entry of beneficiaries
“Entomotic digesters offer a mechanized and scalable alternative,” says Sam Gui, Biobest’s market development manager at High Tech IPM. “Using a tank mix allows for controlled and uniform delivery of one or more biological control agents at the same time, through multiple points. The result is more accurate and efficient introduction of beneficial mites and insects throughout the crop.”

“Generally, growers add the beneficials in the hopper, allowing for mixing in the workflow. Alternatively, they pre-mix in containers, measured per bay or section, facilitating quick and accurate refilling during the distribution operation.”

© BIOBEST

Gentle hands promote high survival rates
“While highly effective, the system is also designed to handle organisms gently,” says Sam. “Controlled airflow and low mechanical stress helps maintain high survival rates and vitality, ensuring beneficials reach the crop alive and active. This supports faster establishment and more effective pest control.”

“Entomal applications can be precisely adjusted to suit different species, carriers and crop conditions. Rotational speed, airflow and distribution points are configurable, allowing growers to achieve repeatable and predictable dosing tailored to specific IPM programs.”

Highly flexible
Compatible with a wide range of beneficial organisms and carrier materials, the flexible Entomatic range is suitable for different cropping systems and IPM strategies.

“By combining multiple beneficial species in a single reservoir, Entomatic™ can target multiple pests in one workflow. By reducing the need for separate applications, it further reduces labor requirements.”

“Entomatic uses tank mixing to deliver consistent uniform coverage, higher survival rates and smarter multi-species propagation. The end result is improved biological performance along with greater operational efficiency.”

For more information:

Biobest Group NV

Tel.: +32 14 25 79 80

An An Idaho campaign says it has gathered enough signatures for an initiative to legalize medical cannabis exceeding the statewide threshold for voting qualification.

But because it’s unclear how much they’re worth and whether the petitions have met another requirement for regional distribution, the Natural Medicine Alliance of Idaho (NMAI) continues to hold signature gathering events across the state to expand its coalition of supporters ahead of the May 1 submission deadline.

As of Friday, NMAI has collected more than 73,000 total signatures — surpassing the statewide requirement of 70,725 for valid petitions — according to the campaign’s website.

To be certified on the ballot, the group must also submit the signatures of at least 6 percent of registered voters in at least 18 of the state’s 35 legislatures. Marihuana Moment reached out to NMAI for a status update on progress toward that goal, but a representative was not immediately available.

Meanwhile, groups of paid and volunteer applicants they are expanding across the state to high-traffic areas to collect signatures, and the NMAI website has a map showing where registered voters can go to sign.

The Idaho Medical Cannabis Act, introduced by NMAI last October, would provide patients with access to marijuana from a limited number of dispensaries and provide a regulatory framework for the market.

Here are the main provisions Idaho Medical Cannabis Law:

• Healthcare practitioners may recommend medical cannabis to patients with conditions including cancer, anxiety and acute pain.
• Medical marijuana patients or designated caregivers can purchase up to 113 grams of cannabis for smoking or 20 grams of THC extract for vaporization per month.
• The state would issue three vertically-integrated cannabis business licenses, and then potentially six licenses in total.
• Marijuana would be reclassified under state law, Title II.
• State and local law enforcement would be prohibited from assisting in drug enforcement activities related to the state’s illegal cannabis program.
• There would be anti-discrimination protections for those who use or sell marijuana in compliance with state laws, preventing adverse actions by employers, landlords and educational institutions.
• There does not seem to be any equity-based reform, nor will the initiative be given the opportunity to grow at home.

“We believe Idahoans deserve access to legal, compassionate and natural care right at home,” NMAI’s website states. “Our mission is to provide patients with a legal path to natural medicine to relieve suffering and restore dignity without the fear of addiction.”

“The Idaho Medical Cannabis Act is our first step. It creates a safe and strictly regulated medical program that allows qualified Idahoans to seek medical treatment for cannabis with a valid diagnosis from a health care provider.” he says. “It supports Idaho agriculture, generates tax revenue to reinvest locally and ensures patients can find natural relief.”

Last month, the campaign also released the results of a statewide poll shows that 83 percent of likely voters support the legalization of medical cannabisincluding 74% of Republicans, 95% of Democrats and 92% of independents.

When asked how they would vote if the current legalization of cannabis appears on the November ballot, 76% of respondents said “yes”. Of that cohort, 50 percent said they would “definitely” vote yes, while only 21 percent said they would vote “no.”

After introducing the medical cannabis initiative last year, a separate 2024 campaign, Kind Idaho, told supporters it would cancel its signature drive. ballot initiative to legalize the personal possession and cultivation of marijuana the adults

Pleasant Idaho previously put medical marijuana ballot measures before voters Both in the 2022 and 2024 elections, but the efforts were unsuccessful.

Meanwhile, this year voters will see a different type of proposal on the ballot: the constitutional amendment approved by the legislature to make it so. only members of the legislature can legalize marijuana or other controlled substances.

—
It’s Marijuana Time tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters by pledging at least $25/month, you’ll get access to our interactive maps, charts, and audio calendars so you never miss a development.

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracking and become a Patreon supporter to gain access
—

Lawmakers held a separate hearing last March to discuss it bill to legalize medical cannabisbut in the following months there has been no significant action on the matter.

Separately, it would be a bill from last year by Rep. Bruce Skaug (R). set a mandatory minimum fine of $420 for possession of cannabisremoving judges’ discretion to apply lower sentences. Skaug said the bill, which ultimately stalled in committee, would send a message that Idaho is tough on marijuana.

Members of the House of Representatives were also admitted bill to ban marijuana adsalthough the Senate later defeated the measure.

Many greenhouse operations are based on structures built decades ago. While these facilities can sustain production for years, rising energy costs, evolving crop demands and advances in climate control are prompting growers to reassess whether they need to renovate existing structures or invest in new construction. The decision depends on balancing performance, cost and long-term operational goals.

© Ceres Greenhouse Solutions

Start with the structure: Is your greenhouse still functional?
The first step is to assess the integrity of the structure. A sound frame and foundation often supports modern upgrades, making upgrading a viable option. Plants should check for corrosion, aging materials and structural damage, as well as whether the building can handle newer systems such as energy curtains or lighting. Design factors, including roof height and truss spacing, also affect airflow and system integration. If the structure remains strong and adaptable, remodeling can significantly improve performance without completely replacing it.

© Ceres Greenhouse Solutions

Common problems that greenhouse construction can solve
Older greenhouses often struggle with consistent climate control, resulting in erratic temperatures, moisture issues, and reduced crop yields. Aging heating, ventilation and insulation systems can also increase energy costs. Renovations can address these issues through better ventilation, improved heating, modern environmental controls and improved glazing. These changes can improve crop consistency while reducing operating expenses.

Case study: a real greenhouse renovation project
A 30-year-old greenhouse in Germany had problems with damaged glass panes and high wind exposure. Instead of rebuilding, a retrofit solution replaced the glazing with ETFE film using a custom track system. This improved light transmission, durability and plant performance, extending the lifespan of the structure. The staggered installation allowed production to continue with minimal disruption, meaning that targeted upgrades could provide significant benefits without a complete rebuild.

© Ceres Greenhouse Solutions

Signs it may be time to rebuild
Reconstruction becomes more appropriate when structural deterioration is severe or design limitations prevent effective improvements. Older greenhouses may have low roof heights, poor airflow, or limited capacity for modern systems, limiting climate control. Changes in crop type can also create the need for new construction, especially when moving to crops with different environmental requirements. In such cases, reconstruction can offer better long-term efficiency and flexibility.

Cost considerations
Upgrades typically involve lower upfront costs and shorter timeframes, often allowing for phased upgrades with minimal disruption. However, it may be limited by design limitations. Retrofitting requires a higher initial investment and longer construction time, but offers full design flexibility, improved energy efficiency and better scalability. Evaluating the return on investment requires consideration of both immediate costs and long-term operating profits.

When the hybrid approach works best
Many operations benefit from a combination of remodeling and reconstruction strategies. Renovating existing structures by adding new greenhouse spaces allows growers to gradually modernize. This approach can optimize capital expenditure, maintain production continuity and support expansion without completely replacing existing infrastructure.

© Ceres Greenhouse Solutions

Questions growers should ask before deciding
Key considerations include the condition of the current structure, the ability to support modern systems, the impact of energy costs and whether environmental conditions limit crop yield. Growers must also assess changes in crop requirements, future expansion plans and expected return on investment. These factors help determine if improvements are sufficient or if new construction is warranted.

Every greenhouse is different
There is no single solution for all operations. Each decision must be based on a careful assessment of the structural situation, production needs and long-term goals. A strategic approach ensures that investments—in retrofitting, rebuilding, or both—result in lasting improvements.

For more information:
Ceres Greenhouse Solutions
(email protected)
www.ceresgs.com