Connect with us

Cannabis News

Donald the Delusional and His Views on Genetically Engineered Cannabis Causing Violence in America

Published

on


Trump on weed violence

Donald the Delusional and his views on Genetically Engineered Cannabis

 

Donald Trump, aka “The Donald,” is the epitome of bizarreness in American politics. He’s the guy who singlehandedly flipped the switch on the level of crazy, forever unveiling the absurdity of the system.

 

He’s activated some sort of a “backdoor program” in the minds of millions, convincing them that he’s some sort of hero or savior against an evil government. Don’t get me wrong, the government is fucking evil, but Trump is not the guy to do anything about it. He’s a rogue agent, yes, but still a part of the system and gaming it like all the rest of them.

 

Now, let’s talk about the latest absurdity that is Donald Trump and his claims that genetically modified cannabis is responsible for the mass murders in the United States.

 

Yes, you read that right. Trump seems to think that weed, which has been used by humans for thousands of years, is suddenly the culprit behind the rise in violence. It’s as if he’s living in some sort of alternate universe where facts don’t matter, and his own personal beliefs reign supreme.

 

To support this claim, Trump pointed to a news article that reported on a man who allegedly smoked a joint laced with “super-strong stuff” before killing his family.

 

But here’s the thing: there’s no evidence to suggest that the weed he smoked was genetically modified or in any way different from what’s been available on the black market for decades.

 

In fact, most scientists agree that genetic engineering of cannabis is still in its infancy and there’s no evidence to suggest that it has any impact on human behavior.

 

Trump’s claims are not only unfounded, but also dangerous. It echoes a claim that was done by early prohibitionists such as Anslinger, DuPont and Heart. They wrote about sensationalist stories of people killing their families with an axe for smoking some doobies. Except, the person who actually killed their family with an axe was a psychotic mentally unstable person with delusional paranoia – similar to “The Donald”.

 

By spreading lies about the effects of marijuana, he’s fueling the stigma against it and contributing to the ongoing war on drugs. It’s time for our “leaders” , a term I use loosely –  to start basing their claims on facts and evidence, instead of fear-mongering and personal beliefs.

 

 

In a speech at a National Rifle Association (NRA) leadership forum on Friday, former President Donald Trump made several controversial and unproven claims. He suggested that psychiatric drugs, transgender hormone treatments and ideology, genetically engineered cannabis, and other narcotics may be causing mass shootings in the country by leading to psychotic breaks that result in gun violence.

 

Now don’t get me wrong, I too have theories about the effects of Psychiatric Medication on the formation of young and developing brains. As this is a claim often used to deter people from using cannabis or other drugs – yet when it comes to Ritalin, Clonapil, or these other psychiatric drugs – we don’t hear a peep.

 

Whether there’s a connection between transgender hormone treatments or other narcotics – I don’t think this is accurate.

 

While it’s true that psychotic breaks definitely plays a role in mass shootings, since no sane person will commit mass murder in such a blatantly insane manner. But these are not “causes”.

 

Trump stated that he would direct the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to investigate these factors as possible causes of mass shootings. He also mentioned that he would have the FDA convene an independent outside panel to investigate his theory. And that’s what it is, “his theory”.

 

Trump dismissed the idea that mass shootings are a gun problem and instead called it a mental health, social, cultural, and spiritual problem.

 

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think it’s a gun problem either. I do agree that it’s about mental health, social and cultural and even spiritual issues. Mass shootings is a symptom of a system that crushes the individual’s soul.

 

Back in the day, we used to call it “Going Postal” – because postal workers were having psychotic breaks as a result of the relentless grind of the system. These days, kids are being introduced to streams of infinite bullshit telling them that everyone else is better and happier than they are.

 

Mass Shootings is the “Going Postal of our times”.

 

While Trump did not pursue a full-scale crackdown of state-legal cannabis programs as president, he did make several hostile anti-marijuana actions. These included rescinding Obama-era guidance on cannabis prosecutions and implementing policies that made immigrants ineligible for citizenship if they consumed marijuana or worked in the cannabis industry.

 

At the NRA event, Trump’s perspective on marijuana took on a conspiratorial new tone, echoing points made by author Alex Berenson. However, it is not clear what he meant by “genetically engineered” marijuana. It is possible that he is referring to concerns about high-potency THC cannabis products. And high potency isn’t “genetically engineered”. It’s selectively bred. Like the way you get a Labradoodle.

 

I wouldn’t call it “genetic engineering” more as a form of eugenics – but in plants. This is not new, because if these “genetic alterations” were to be the reason – then all of the genetically engineered corn Americans eat is turning them into monsters. But of course, the Corn industry wouldn’t like you to think about that.

 

Trump’s comments are likely to alienate parts of his base that have held out hope he would lead the charge on ending cannabis prohibition. While Republicans are less likely to support cannabis legalization compared to Democrats and independents, the issue has become increasingly bipartisan.

 

The fact of the matter is that Trump is simply saying shit to please those who are listening, in this case the NRA.

 

 

In the world of cannabis cultivation, there are two terms that are often used interchangeably: “genetic engineering” and “selective breeding.” While both of these methods are used to produce desirable traits in cannabis plants, they are fundamentally different in nature.

 

Selective breeding is the process of intentionally breeding plants with desirable traits in order to produce offspring with those same traits. This is a practice that has been used in agriculture for centuries, and it involves selecting the best plants from a crop and breeding them with each other to create a new generation of plants that inherit those desirable traits.

 

For cannabis cultivators, selective breeding means carefully choosing which plants to breed based on traits like yield, potency, flavor, and aroma. This can involve selecting plants that are naturally resistant to pests or diseases, or choosing plants with a specific cannabinoid profile.

 

Genetic engineering, on the other hand, involves altering the genetic makeup of a plant using biotechnology. This can include introducing new genes into a plant’s DNA or altering existing genes in order to produce specific traits.

 

While genetic engineering has been used in other crops to create desirable traits like resistance to pests or drought, it is not currently used in the cannabis industry due to legal restrictions. In fact, most cannabis cultivators rely on selective breeding to produce the plants they want.

 

One of the main differences between selective breeding and genetic engineering is that selective breeding is a natural process that relies on the inherent variability of a plant’s genetic makeup, while genetic engineering is an artificial process that involves manipulating genes in a laboratory.

 

Another difference is that selective breeding allows for a degree of unpredictability in the resulting plants, as the combination of genes from two parent plants can create unexpected traits in their offspring. Genetic engineering, on the other hand, is a precise process that allows for more control over the resulting traits.

 

In the cannabis industry, there is often confusion around these two concepts, with some people mistakenly using the term “genetic engineering” to refer to selective breeding. However, it is important to understand the difference between these two methods in order to have a clear understanding of how cannabis plants are produced.

 

While both selective breeding and genetic engineering are used in agriculture to produce desirable traits in plants, they are fundamentally different methods.

 

Selective breeding is a natural process that relies on the inherent variability of a plant’s genetic makeup, while genetic engineering is an artificial process that involves manipulating genes in a laboratory. In the cannabis industry, selective breeding is the primary method used to produce desirable traits in plants, and genetic engineering is not currently used due to legal restrictions.

 

And it’s because of these differences that I know that Trump is full of shit. The fact of the matter is that he’s only using certain buzz words to get people to write about the stupid shit that comes out of his mouth.

 

My Plea to Americans

 

My plea to Americans is simple: don’t insult your own intelligence by electing either Biden or Trump in 2024. These two individuals are the epitome of what’s wrong with American politics. They are nothing but parasites who feed off of your hard work and sacrifice. They will take everything you hold dear – your freedom, your security, your money – and sell it to their corporate donors and sponsors.

 

The sad truth is that both Trump and Biden represent everyone but you. They are not leaders who care about the well-being of the American people. Instead, they care only about their own power and enrichment. They are not interested in creating a better America for all of us. They are interested in protecting their own interests and the interests of their cronies.

 

If you vote for either of these individuals, you are selling your own integrity. You are saying that you are okay with being used as a product by these politicians. You are saying that you are okay with them taking everything you have worked for and giving it away to their rich friends.

 

It’s time to wake up and realize that this is all a game rigged against you. Don’t follow the tribe in the upcoming election. Follow your heart. Don’t listen to the lies of the rich bastards who want to sell you a cheap story in exchange for all your power.

 

Psychopaths are ruling us all. We need to take back our power and start electing leaders who truly care about the American people. We need leaders who will fight for our freedom, our security, and our prosperity. We need leaders who will put the interests of the American people above their own.

 

So, my plea to Americans is this: don’t be fooled by the empty promises of politicians who don’t care about you. Don’t vote for Trump or Biden. Vote for someone who truly represents your values and your interests. Vote for someone who will fight for a better America – not just for the rich and powerful, but for all of us.

 

The future of America is in your hands. Don’t waste your vote on someone who will only take advantage of you. Vote for a leader who will truly make a difference in your life and the lives of your fellow Americans. It’s time to take back our power and create a brighter future for ourselves and for future generations.

 

WHY WE SHOULD LEGALIZE WEED EVEN IF TRUMP IS RIGHT, READ ON…

LEGALIZE MARIJUANA EVEN IF HE WASN'T

WHY WE SHOULD LEGALIZE WEED EVEN IF ANTI-POT GROUPS ARE RIGHT!



Source link

Cannabis News

Maintaining The Highest Level of Quality and Freshness for THCa Products

Published

on

By


 

thca products

When looking for food, the freshness and quality of the product are essential to the customer. Care must be taken with every product to keep its original qualities. This makes sure that customers have the best experience possible with every buy. Brands ensure their products stay potent and fresh, so to maintain they put them in airtight containers. This gives customers a premium experience that stands out in the market even if they are bought from thca flower clearance. This is especially important when it comes to cannabis goods. Keeping THC-rich flowers fresh ensures every person has a good experience that meets their needs.

The practice of storing things in air-tight containers is very helpful for maintaining their quality. These containers help keep out air, light, and wetness, which can all make the product fresh and effective over time. For people who use cannabis, how fresh the product is can have a big effect on how strong and how long the benefits last. When THC flowers are stored properly, users can expect a better experience that keeps all of the product’s benefits.

The chemicals that give weed its unique tastes and smells, don’t break down when it is stored in an airtight container. Terpenes are very important for improving the taste and making each type unique. The natural qualities of these terpenes can be kept safe by storing them in the right way. This way, every user can enjoy the full range of tastes and smells that the product has to offer.

Why airtight containers are important

Containers that don’t let air in are not only useful, they are necessary for storing things. Over the time, oxygen can break down the product’s cannabinoids and oils. When you use airtight cases, the product stays protected from the outside world. This keeps its chemical structure and makes sure it stays strong.

The users will trust the products only if they feel good about quality. Whether they are used for fun or medical reasons, THC flowers if not stored correctly may have less effect, giving a bad experience for users. To keep the level of quality, it is important to spend money on good storage methods like using airtight containers.

Make sure you have a great time

When a product has been carefully stored in the best possible ways, the experience is more powerful. Whether you are buying flowers to help you feel better or just for fun, they should always be live. With this care, users can get a product that works well like they bought the day it was packaged.

Freshness is at the heart of this process. By making sure that goods are kept in containers that keep air out, businesses can keep up the quality of the goods and make sure that customers can get the best items. Customers are happier and more likely to trust the brand to always provide better goods.

In the end, keeping the product fresh and high-quality isn’t just about keeping it safe, it is also about giving the customer a regular, good experience. Making sure that a product stays fresh and effective from the time it is packed until it gets to the customer is very important. One easy and very effective way to reach this goal is to store things in containers that keep air out. Looking at good storage methods will continue to be important for keeping the quality of THC products even as the cannabis business grows. Customers can be sure that this way of keeping things fresh and effective will make their experience better, whether they are looking for new types or taking advantage of thca flower clearance deals.



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Cannabis Code Enforcement Fines Must be Remedial, Not Punitive, Federal Court of Appeal Holds

Published

on

By


The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal has reinstated a civil rights lawsuit against Humboldt County, California, that challenges the county’s practices in imposing punitive daily fines. It is the first time a federal appellate court has weighed in on local government’s enforcement of code violations involving cannabis farms.

The Court of Appeal decision

The decision, in Thomas v. County of Humboldt, comes after years of complaints by cannabis cultivators that local governments impose unfair fines for technical violations at licensed farms. That counties and municipalities have adopted and are enforcing large fines involving licensed properties is one of many reasons why increasing numbers of farms have given up their licenses and shut down completely or returned to the illicit market. This is hurting state efforts to bolster the legal market and suppress the illicit market for cannabis.

Lessons for industry and regulators

A takeaway from the decision is that local governments need to keep the goal of remediation in mind in establishing penalties, must be more reasonable in allowing cultivators to fix violations, and more flexible in decisions to impose fines and settling disputes. The decision should motivate county and city attorneys, and cannabis licensees and applicants, seek assistance from a mediator with expertise in the cannabis market and regulation. The courthouse might not now be as friendly a venue for local government as it has been in the past.

Most cannabis businesses that run afoul of local codes pay the penalties, no matter how unfair they might seem, because they can’t afford a long legal battle and the administrative and court processes are tilted against the property owner. Administrative hearing officers routinely uphold notices of violations and the penalties imposed by code enforcement officers. Writs of mandate brought against local government in state court, particularly in smaller counties, are extremely difficult to win.

Background on the Thomas case

What has made the Thomas case viable is that several plaintiffs banded together in a civil rights class action in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Humboldt County’s penalties for cannabis abatement violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause.

Humboldt County established a schedule of daily fines for illegal cannabis cultivation of up to $10,000, with a minimum of $6,000. Upon receiving a notice of violation from the county, the party has 10 days to abate all violations, subject to an appeals process, during which penalties continue to accrue. Violations included not just the illegal cultivation of cannabis itself, but also any other violation that facilitates illegal cultivation of cannabis. The Thomas plaintiffs contended that the county issues violation notices with hefty fines based on imprecise data (such as satellite and drone photos) and for code violations that originated with previous property owners.

The lower District Court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the plaintiffs lack legal standing, because they had not, at the time of suit, paid any penalties. But the Ninth Circuit held that the plaintiffs had concrete injuries, providing standing, because they suffered emotional distress and had incurred expenses with engineers and attorneys as they attempted to abate the alleged violations and defended themselves in hearings.

Getting to the merits of the lawsuit, the Ninth Circuit held that the plaintiffs had plausible claims under the Excessive Fines Clause because the penalties were punitive, not remedial. The Ninth Circuit agreed with the plaintiffs that the fines were unconstitutionally excessive because (1) the notices were vague, often inaccurate, or involved violations that pre-dated the plaintiffs’ occupation of their properties; (2) lesser penalties could accomplish the same health and safety goals; and (3) the alleged offenses caused no harm beyond a technical lack of compliance with the county’s permitting regulations.

Humboldt provides for an administrative appeal before a hearing officer who determines whether a violation has occurred or continues to exist. The hearing officer can only reduce the penalty for a violation in limited circumstances and cannot reduce it to less than $6,000 per day. Although the Ninth Circuit did not explicitly address it in the Thomas decision, a property owner in most circumstances also can be forced to pay the county or municipality’s abatement costs and legal expenses — including those incurred in a subsequent writ of mandate proceeding in state court. The Ninth Circuit agreed that the Thomas plaintiffs had come under:

“immense pressure to settle due to the County’s issuance of ruinous fines, . . . its undue delay in providing hearings, its denial of permits while abatements are pending, and the cost the County imposes to prove one’s innocence.”

The Ninth Circuit found that Humboldt County’s fines were “clearly punitive, not remedial as argued by the County.” The fines could reach millions of dollars, and, in the case of one plaintiff, the fines dwarfed the value of her property. The appellate court was untroubled by the involvement of cannabis, which remains unlawful under the federal Controlled Substances Act:

“[I]t seems clear to us that lesser penalties could accomplish the same health and safety goals,” and “the offenses here have caused no harm beyond a technical lack of compliance with the County’s cannabis permitting regulations.”

The Thomas plaintiffs’ strategy pays off

The Thomas plaintiffs’ strategy of going to federal court was fraught, because the court could have just as easily declined to hear the matter under the illegality doctrine, but it paid off here; the Ninth Circuit not only considered the case but also disregarded the problem of whether the plaintiffs were entitled to any remedy under federal law.

The Ninth Circuit concluded by acknowledging that local government is “often at the forefront of addressing difficult and complex issues,” but it should use “flexibility” in decision making and “cannot overstep its authority and impose fines on its citizens without paying heed to the limits posed by the Eighth Amendment.”

Note: This post was first published January 6, 2025 on the Alger ADR Blog



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Are Americans Shifting to Cannabis and Saying Goodbye to Cigarettes for Good?

Published

on

By


no more cigarettes

Are Americans Shifting To Weed And Saying Goodbye To Cigarettes?

 

We live in a time when people are more health-conscious than ever.

 

For the first time in history, we’re seeing a downward trend in the consumption of cigarettes, especially among young adults and adolescents. Just a few decades ago, cigarettes were considered ‘cool’. The link between cancer and cigarettes were established by the 1950’s, though accepting that cigarette smoking was “bad” for you didn’t take root socially until around the late 1990’s.  

 

Now, we know that cigarette smoking is a dangerous, often fatal habit that leads to cancer, respiratory illnesses, and heart disease. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), over 8 million people die prematurely from tobacco use yearly.

 

In the results of a Gallup poll from early 2024, they found that more Americans are more likely to smoke weed than cigarettes, while young people are more than 5 times more likely to choose weed over tobacco. The poll found that 17% of Americans smoke weed, while 12% admitted to smoking cigarettes in the previous week. The more dramatic difference was observed among the 18-34 age range, where 26% admitted to consuming weed while only 5% of them still smoke cigarettes.

 

For the same poll, they also found that the older adults aged 55 and up were more likely to still smoke cigarettes compared to marijuana. “Americans’ reported marijuana smoking has more than doubled since 2013, when Gallup first added the question in its annual Consumption Habits survey,” explained Gallup. “That year, seven percent said they did,” they reported.

 

Improved Public Perceptions Leads To Healthier Choices

 

One can’t deny that there has been a massive shift in the increasing awareness of marijuana’s health benefits, as well as the dangers of cigarette smoking. This leads to changing public perceptions, better and more scientific research as well as clinical studies, and an improvement in the law.


The law, specifically, has been instrumental in mitigating the spread of cigarette use. For example, many governments worldwide have established strict no-smoking policies and placed a massive tax on cigarettes. Tobacco manufacturers are no longer allowed to freely advertise their product. All these have led to a downward trend in cigarette smoking habits and purchasing.

 

The proliferation of legal cannabis throughout North America, not just for medical use but also for recreational use has also contributed to a widespread cultural acceptance of cannabis, which has also improved the public perception of the drug. As we speak, it’s already become a part of society not just in North America but also in countries such as Thailand, several European nations, Uruguay, and Mexico to name a few.

 

In addition, people are also becoming more educated about the use of alcohol. While it may still be the most widely used intoxicant, its days me be numbered: there is a small yet growing number of people who are choosing to replace alcohol with weed, because of the sheer number of studies proving the dangerous link between fatal illnesses and alcohol. Not to mention that alcohol is linked to drunk driving and road fatalities, multiple different types of cancers, horrible hangovers, and so much more.

 

Even Gallup polls from as far back as 2022 revealed that people in the United States have already begun to smoke more weed than cigarettes. Gallup conducted the survey from July 5 through 26 of 2022. The results reveal that 11% of the population smoke cigarettes, while back in the mid-1950’s, 45% of Americans smoked them. Meanwhile, 16% of Americans reported that they smoke weed, and 48% tried it in the past. Back in 1969, just 4% of Americans smoked weed!

 

It’s clear that societal and cultural perceptions around both have changed dramatically. “Smoking cigarettes is on the decline and is most likely to become even more of a rarity in the years ahead,” explains Gallup Senior Scientist Dr. Frank Newport. “This reflects both public awareness of its negative effects and continuing government efforts at all levels to curtail its use,” he said.

 

Unfortunately, the Gallup poll also found that alcohol remains a popular substance for Americans. Despite the increasing studies being published right now that alcohol is a proven carcinogen, one can’t blame the population: it’s legal, easily accessible, and affordable for many.

 

Overall, it seems that the demand for wellness is slowly taking over. Wellness is no longer just a buzzword or a trend; it’s a real pursuit that more, especially young people, are seeking. And cannabis fits very well into that picture: whether CBD or THC, the components of marijuana have proven beneficial for the mental and physical health of people, across a wide age group. From pediatric CBD applications to therapeutic uses for the elderly, cannabis can be beneficial for many people.

It’s so easy to see why thousands of young adults commonly include cannabis as part of their everyday wellness regimen – the same generation that have shunned cigarette smoking for good.

 

Conclusion

 

If you really must have a smoking habit, choose weed over cigarettes. Even then, any type of weed is much healthier than tobacco. Marijuana is so much healthier for your mind and body, and it can function as a medicine and supplement as well.

 

For individuals who are struggling to quit smoking cigarettes, you might even want to consider using cannabis as a cessation aid. Many have found success using cannabis to quit cigarettes, with longer-lasting success rates.

 

CAN CANNABIS HELP YOU QUIT CIGARETTES? READ BELOW…

CAN WEED HELP YOU QUIT CIGARETTES

CAN WEED HELP YOU QUIT CIGARETTES? WE ASKED THE PROS!



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media