The Rescheduling Ruse: Why I Told You So

In a move that surprised absolutely no one who’s been paying attention, the White House recently announced it has “no action planned” on marijuana reform. Yes, the same marijuana reform that President Trump enthusiastically backed on the campaign trail just weeks before Election Day.

The writing was on the wall all along, folks. I’ve been telling you for months that the much-hyped rescheduling of cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III was nothing more than political theater – a carefully choreographed dance designed to generate headlines without delivering substantive change. And here we are, with yet another administration putting cannabis reform on the back burner while millions of Americans continue to live under the shadow of failed prohibition policies.

Don’t get me wrong – I’m not here to play political favorites. This isn’t a red versus blue issue. The Biden administration dangled the same carrot, initiating a rescheduling process that conveniently stalled due to “complications” with DEA hearings. Different players, same game.

Let’s take a step back and examine what’s really happening here, because the truth about cannabis reform in America is both simpler and more complex than most people realize.

Trump’s pre-election cannabis conversion was quite the spectacle, wasn’t it? Suddenly, the man who selected Jeff “Good People Don’t Smoke Marijuana” Sessions as his first Attorney General was voicing support for rescheduling, banking access, and even Florida’s legalization initiative.

But as CNN recently reported, “no action is being considered at this time.” The honeymoon didn’t even last through the first dance. The administration’s priorities lie elsewhere – immigration, government spending, foreign policy – while cannabis reform gets shelved alongside countless other campaign promises.

Interestingly, CNN did note that Trump and his transition team attempted to include cannabis banking protections in December’s government funding resolution. This behind-the-scenes effort suggests at least some genuine interest in the issue, but hardly qualifies as the bold reform millions of voters were led to expect.

This pattern should feel familiar. The Biden administration made similar overtures, with the president announcing pardons for federal marijuana possession offenses and directing an administrative review of cannabis scheduling. That process dragged on for over a year, with the DEA repeatedly delaying final action. Biden got the headlines; cannabis users got nothing.

The harsh reality? Cannabis reform makes for good campaign fodder, but terrible governance priorities. Once elected, the political calculus changes dramatically. The motivation to deliver evaporates when the votes are already counted and the special interests start calling in their favors.

At the heart of this perpetual delay lies the Drug Enforcement Administration – an agency whose very existence depends on the continuation of the drug war. Expecting the DEA to facilitate cannabis reform is like asking a turkey to vote for Thanksgiving.

The DEA has mastered the art of procedural obstruction. Under Biden, they scheduled hearings, requested extensions, and effectively ran out the clock. Under Trump, they appear poised to do absolutely nothing, perhaps not even bothering with the pretense of consideration.

The pattern becomes clearer when you look at Trump’s cabinet picks. His nominee to lead the DEA, Terrance Cole, has previously voiced serious concerns about marijuana dangers and linked its use to higher suicide risk among youth. His HHS general counsel nominee, Mike Stuart, is so staunchly anti-cannabis that prohibitionist groups openly celebrated his selection.

Even Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who previously supported legalization, has walked back his stance since being confirmed as HHS Secretary, stating he’s “worried about” high-potency marijuana and deferring to the DEA on rescheduling.

When you stack the regulatory deck with cannabis skeptics, you’ve telegraphed your true intentions no matter what you said on the campaign trail.

Here’s what I’ve been saying all along: meaningful cannabis reform was never going to come from the White House, regardless of who occupied it. The DEA will never willingly relinquish its power, and politicians will always prioritize easier wins over controversial reforms.

The only real path forward is through Congress completely removing cannabis from the Controlled Substances Act. Full stop. No rescheduling, no administrative reviews, no half-measures. Cannabis needs to be descheduled entirely, returning regulatory authority to the states where it belongs.

But while we push for that goal, the real revolution continues on two fronts.

First, state-by-state legalization marches forward. Despite federal inaction, 38 states have medical marijuana programs, and 24 states plus DC have legalized adult use. Each new state that joins the ranks weakens prohibition’s grip and demonstrates the failure of federal policy.

Second, and perhaps more powerful, is what I call “mass defiance of an unjust law.” Every day, millions of Americans peacefully consume cannabis in direct violation of federal law. They grow it in their homes, share it with friends, and build communities around it. This civil disobedience at scale is perhaps the most effective weapon against prohibition.

The federal government simply doesn’t have the resources to enforce cannabis prohibition against a population that increasingly rejects it. When enough people break an unjust law, the law itself becomes unenforceable.

I hate to say I told you so, but… I told you so. The rescheduling promise was never going to materialize, regardless of who won the White House. It was a political mirage, designed to attract voters while requiring minimal commitment.

But don’t mistake my cynicism about federal action for pessimism about our cause. Cannabis reform is happening – it’s just happening from the ground up rather than the top down. Every state that legalizes, every municipality that decriminalizes, every voter who demands change, and yes, every person who peacefully consumes despite prohibition is part of this unstoppable movement.

The lesson here is simple: Don’t put your faith in presidential promises or administrative processes. Put it in your local ballot initiatives, your state legislators, and your own power to reject unjust laws through peaceful non-compliance.

Cannabis prohibition is dying, not because presidents commanded it, but because we the people have decided it must end. That’s the real power in our democracy – not the fleeting promises of politicians, but the sustained will of the citizens.

So next time a candidate promises to fix cannabis laws, remember this moment. Then go out and fix them yourself, one vote, one state, and one act of principled defiance at a time. That’s how real change happens in America, and that’s how we’ll finally end cannabis prohibition once and for all.

CANNABIS UNDER TRUMP 2.0, READ ON…

WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO CANNABIS UNDER TRUMP 2.0?

Quitting Won’t Fill the Hole

There’s a pervasive notion that floats around recovery circles—this idea that once you kick your habit, everything will magically fall into place. The clouds will part, the birds will sing, and suddenly life will be worth living again. While it’s true that being addicted to a “thing,” whether substance or act, eventually tallies up consequences that weigh heavy on our souls, the math isn’t quite as simple as “remove addiction, add happiness.”

I’ve watched countless cannabis enthusiasts (and addicts of all stripes) fall into this trap. They sit in circles, eyes gleaming with hope as they declare, “If I could only quit, then everything would be better…” But they’re missing something crucial—their addiction isn’t the source of their discontent; it’s merely a symptom of something deeper.

Addiction, at its core, is a means of dealing with something we cannot name or are desperately trying to avoid. It’s the bandage we slap over a wound without cleaning it first. The cannabis, the alcohol, the gambling, the endless scrolling—these aren’t the disease itself but rather the body’s misguided attempt at self-medication.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth that most recovery programs don’t emphasize enough: if you don’t do the real healing, even if you manage to white-knuckle your way through quitting one addiction, you’ll inevitably find something else to cover that gaping wound. Maybe you’ll trade joints for junk food, or bongs for binge-watching. The face of the addiction changes, but the role it plays remains constant.

Let’s take a deeper dive into this cycle and why simply quitting isn’t enough to truly heal.

First, we must acknowledge that when it comes to pain and addiction, everyone’s journey is unique. What feels like an insurmountable mountain to you might be a speed bump to someone else, and vice versa. There’s no universal scale for suffering, which makes navigating these waters all the more complex.

However, across all these varied experiences, there’s a common trap I’ve seen ensnare countless individuals—what I call the “If/Then Fallacy.” It’s the belief that one singular thing is the root cause of all our discomfort. This is where addicts often say, “If I can only kick this addiction, then my whole life would be better.” While this may seem logical on paper, it’s a deeply flawed perspective.

The real issue rarely lies with the substance or behavior itself but with something deeper—something the addiction is helping us avoid or cope with. Whether it’s trauma, depression, anxiety, or simply the existential weight of being human in an increasingly disconnected world, there’s usually a wound beneath the bandage.

Furthermore, the “If/Then” scenario places your healing, joy, and accomplishments in a fictional future state. “If I stop smoking weed, then I’ll finally have the motivation to start that business.” “If I quit drinking, then my relationship will improve.” These statements create a dangerous binary—because when the “if” is satisfied but the “then” doesn’t materialize, where does that leave you? Often, it leads to “If that didn’t work, then what’s the point of trying anything?”

This thinking creates a perfect setup for relapse or substituting one addiction for another. After all, if quitting didn’t magically transform your life as promised, why continue to deny yourself that temporary relief?

If you’ve been considering quitting cannabis or any other addiction, and you believe it to be the sole source of your unhappiness, I strongly urge you to reconsider your framework. The cannabis, or your relationship with it, is likely just a mask for your real pain. If you want to truly liberate yourself from the burden of addiction, you need to develop the capacity to sit with your pain, examine it, and cultivate joy despite it—not because it disappeared.

This article was inspired by a post I came across while scrolling through Reddit the other day—one of those moments where someone’s raw honesty stops you mid-scroll. A 32-year-old man shared that after smoking cannabis and drinking 4-6 beers daily for nearly his entire 20s, he had finally managed to quit both. No cannabis for almost six months, no alcohol for three. A significant achievement by any measure.

Yet instead of the transformation he expected, he felt “MISERABLE.” Despite taking medication for ADHD and anxiety, and despite removing substances that conventional wisdom says should improve his mental health, he felt no positive change. In fact, he felt worse, as if he’d “stopped doing things that were fun for me, or at least making life bearable.”

His post ended with a plea that broke my heart: “Is this just how I’m going to feel now? Does this go away eventually?”

This redditor’s experience perfectly illustrates the point—even when you manage to power through the physical and psychological challenges of quitting an addiction, your mental and spiritual state doesn’t necessarily transform as a result. His baseline remained exactly the same, perhaps even dipping lower without the chemical crutches he’d relied on for so long.

When you’re changing habits but not experiencing the promised benefits, it’s a clear sign that your discomfort or pain isn’t primarily coming from the substance. The cannabis or alcohol wasn’t creating your misery—it was masking it, providing temporary relief from a deeper issue that remains unaddressed.

This is something we all must consider when facing our compulsions. If you find yourself in a situation where you want to stop a behavior but simply can’t, it might be time to look deeper. Ask yourself, “Why do I do this activity?” And then ask “why” five more times, each answer digging a layer deeper toward the root cause.

Why do I smoke cannabis every night? Because it helps me relax. Why do I need help relaxing? Because my mind races with anxiety. Why does my mind race with anxiety? Because I’m worried about my future. Why am I worried about my future? Because I don’t feel secure in my career path. Why don’t I feel secure in my career path? Because I never really chose it—I fell into it. Why does that bother me? Because I feel like I’m not living authentically or pursuing my true passions.

Once you’ve excavated to this deeper level, you can begin to address the root causes directly. Perhaps the issue isn’t the cannabis at all, but rather that you need to reassess your career path or find meaning outside of work. Without this deeper work, quitting the substance becomes an exercise in willpower rather than healing.

Your addiction isn’t necessarily the root cause of your issues—it’s often just the most visible symptom. If you’re depressed, anxious, or feeling lost, it’s not primarily because of the substance; it’s because of something deeper that the substance helps you manage or forget temporarily.

Unless you actually do the internal work on these matters—examining your pain, seeking appropriate mental health support, rebuilding healthy relationships, finding meaning and purpose—no matter what you quit or how long you stay “clean,” you’ll likely find yourself seeking new ways to shield yourself from the pain. The prison isn’t cannabis or alcohol; it’s the unhealed wound those substances help you endure.

If you’re struggling right now, it’s absolutely important to seek help. That might mean therapy, support groups, or speaking with a healthcare provider about potential underlying mental health conditions that need treatment. But alongside that external support, commit to the honest and difficult work of looking inward. Ask yourself what you’re truly trying to avoid when you reach for that joint or that drink.

At the end of the day, we all have our struggles. If yours involves cannabis at this point in your life, there’s no judgment here. I’ve been there myself. But I’ve also learned that true healing rarely comes from simply removing something from your life—it comes from adding understanding, self-compassion, and addressing the real gaps in your heart and mind that the substance was never capable of filling in the first place.

The void can’t be filled by quitting. But quitting might just give you the clarity to finally see what the void truly needs.

QUITTING CANNABIS, READ ON…

THE STONER’S GUIDE TO QUITTING WEED – WAIT, WHAT…WHY?

DOWNLOAD THE PODCAST FOR FREE AT PODOMATIC

https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/karmakoalapodcast/episodes/2025-04-04T03_45_51-07_00

Stumbling around the latest legal publishing lists for my other  legal information website that I publish Practicesource.com I was very pleasantly surprised to learn that Edward Elgar  are to publish a standalone title on cannabis and intellectual property next month.

Well researched and written cannabis legal titles are as rare as hen’s teeth and this will be the first title that I’m aware of that has taken a detailed look at the topic.

A quick email to the publishers put me in touch with author – editors, Professor Enrico Bonadio and Dr. Natalie Corthésy who guide us through the why, what and wherefores of the book.

This episode makes especially pleasurable listening as the English language never sounds better than when given to us by an Italian and a Jamaican.

I hope to get them both back sooner rather than later to dig into a bit more detail about specific IP issues popping up around the planet

In the meantime do buy the book and support the publishing house. We need them, now, more than ever.

The Book

This pioneering book explores the relationship between intellectual property (IP) and cannabis. Expert scholars from across the globe reflect on the legal, cultural, and socio-economic significance of cannabis, addressing the difficulties of adapting legal frameworks to this unique and multifaceted product.

Chapters delve into key issues at the intersection of IP and cannabis, from branding and packaging to social equity concerns surrounding the rapid growth of the market. Contributing authors demonstrate the intricate contradictions between positive IP protection and cannabis regulation, drawing on case studies from jurisdictions where the product is legalised to varying degrees, including Canada, Jamaica, Uruguay, and the Netherlands. Covering different plant varieties, moral rights, and links between cannabis and traditional knowledge, this incisive book highlights the challenges of harmonising global cannabis laws while balancing innovation and tradition.

Providing novel interdisciplinary insights into the controversies and complexities of the law surrounding cannabis, this book is an essential read for students and academics in intellectual property law, pharmaceutical law, innovation and economics. It is also an invaluable toolkit for policymakers in governments and tribunals, as well as commercial entrepreneurs.

Edited by Natalie Corthésy, Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Law, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica, Enrico Bonadio, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, The City Law School, City St George’s, University of London, UK and Yentyl Williams, Research Assistant to the Dean, Faculty of Law, The University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica

Publication Date: May 2025 ISBN: 978 1 03532 938 0 Extent: c 384 pp

Learn more and place your order at