Health Canada is cracking down on cannabis drinks with the word “soda,” “cola,” “root beer,” and “ginger ale.”
In a letter sent to licensed producers, bureaucrats with too much time on their hands write,
It is Health Canada’s position that the use of certain terms commonly referring to a sweetened soft drink, such as ‘soda’, ‘cola’, ‘root beer’ or ‘ginger ale’ may result in the sale of cannabis with packaging/labelling that is prohibited.
If required, Health Canada may take enforcement measures to address non-compliance or mitigate risks to public health or public safety.
Of course, this is for “the children” since fizzy soda drinks may appeal to them.
Never mind that children aren’t allowed in cannabis shops where these are sold. Or that cannabis soda cans come with child-resistant packaging.
Or the obvious fact that soda – whether it contains cannabis or not – is not a beverage children should drink.
Health Canada just provided another example of how Canada is broken.
Cannabis Soda Accounts for Over 50% of Beverage Sales
Source: Headset
According to the cannabis analytics firm Headset, cannabis sodas account for nearly 60% of all cannabis beverage sales.
We’re not sure who’s buying these weak 10mg sugary drinks. Why not take a cannabis tincture of higher potency and wash it down with a regular can of soda at a fraction of the cost?
Regardless, the move is another example of Canada’s anti-consumer cannabis industry. Where appeals to “young people” trump the free choices of adults.
Last week, Ottawa Public Health suggested Health Canada bans words like “gummies” and “candies” from appearing on cannabis products. They also want graphic images on every product, like cigarettes.
CLN e-mailed Ottawa Public Health for a response. In particular, we wanted to know why they’re not concerned with “gummies” and “candies” in general. After all, refined sugar is far more relevant and dangerous to children than a few accidental cannabis ingestions.
“We invite you to reach out directly to the Government of Canada,” was their non-answer.
In Trudeau’s Canada, self-serving bureaucrats are clearly drunk on their own power. These people wouldn’t last a minute in the private sector.
You know it’s bad when you’ve got George Smitherman – no friend to B.C. Bud – telling MjBizdaily, that these prohibitions “are not rooted in science.”
The lesson here is that you can’t satisfy Health Canada. They are like the woke-Twitter mob. It’s never enough for them.
Ergo, Canada’s “illicit” cannabis market is justified in forgoing this vacuous regulatory system.
Cannabis Sodas? What About Alcohol?
If cannabis sodas are appealing to children, then what about alcohol?
Walk into any Canadian liquor store, and you can find pre-mixed Jack & Cokes. Vodka drinks that look like Kool-Aid. Rum-infused root beer. Even the name “root beer” is problematic.
What about glass bottles designed to look like beer bottles? As a kid, I remember drinking the brand Dad’s Root Beer, thinking how cool it was to drink from a bottle.
And what about graphic images on cases of beer? Alcohol is a literal poison.
Of course, we’re not advocating for any of that. Consumers should have free choice. Producers should have free expression.
The only issue would be if there were fraud involved. Like selling a product labelled “Cannabis Root Beer” only to realize it’s not root beer at all. Or that it has no cannabis in it.
Cannabis or No Cannabis: Soda is Not for Young People
One of the worst things you can give your kid is a can of pop. If anything, adding cannabis to the soda may be an improvement in nutritional value.
Consider,
Tooth Decay: Soda is basically liquid sugar, with some 355ml cans containing 50 grams. (It makes the 10mg THC cap look silly in comparison, no?) Soda is also acidic, contributing to tooth decay and cavities. When you combine sugar with the bacteria in your mouth, you form an acid that attacks tooth enamel.
Obesity: Soda is a significant source of empty calories. It provides no nutritional value and contributes to weight gain. It’s not correlation; it’s causation. Regular consumption of sodas increases the risk of obesity.
Reduced Hydration: Soda is not a hydrating beverage. It contributes to dehydration due to its diuretic effect. Children who regularly choose soda over water or milk may not be adequately hydrating their developing bodies.
Decreased Bone Health: Research suggests that sodas negatively impact bone health. The phosphoric acid found in many sodas can interfere with the body’s ability to absorb calcium, which is crucial for developing strong bones.
More Ways Health Canada Does Not Care About Your Kids
Health Canada’s crackdown on cannabis sodas is pure politics. They’re a group of overpaid bureaucrats who impose their ideology on a population of once-free and prosperous adults.
Nowhere is this more obvious than appealing to “the children” when it comes to cannabis soda but disregarding the real damaging effects of soda in general.
Consider these additional ways soda destroys a child’s health.
Increased Risk of Chronic Diseases: Regular soda consumption increases the risk of chronic health conditions such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and metabolic syndrome. Unless your kid was born with a compromised immune system, if they’ve got these issues before they’re 18, you were unfit to raise children. And Health Canada’s selective propaganda does not help.
Addiction: Soda’s high sugar content creates a strong preference for more of the stuff. Children develop addict-like behaviour. They crave it and get moody when they can’t have it.
No Nutritional Value: Whether it’s cannabis soda or regular soda, there is no nutritional value. Soda is high in added sugars and lacks vitamins and minerals. When children consume soda, they’re forgoing healthier beverages like milk.
Of course, raw milk is illegal in Canada, and the pasteurized milk industry is a cartel that keeps prices artificially high. So the health of the nation’s children is clearly not Health Canada’s top priority.
What is Health Canada’s priority? It’s certainly not the health and well-being of Canadians. This latest crackdown on cannabis sodas is further proof of that fact.
Part of the cannabis industry supported the new president, betting he was going to move and move quickly on cannabis – the White House finally commented.
The cannabis industry has been a boon for consumers, medical patients, veterans and legal states, but for the thousands of mom and pop businesses is has been a roller coaster. With a huge demand, it would seem to be easy money, but the federal, tax, and banking restrictions have made it difficult to grow and expand. Part of the industry were all for the new administration assuming they would support positive change, but many in the new cabinet and the House Speaker Mike Johnson are foes. Now the White House finally comments on marijuana industry…and it doesn’t show a clear path.
The administration’s current stance on marijuana reform is marked by inaction, despite campaign promises and earlier signals of support for cannabis-related reforms. A White House official recently confirmed that “no action is being considered at this time” regarding marijuana policy, leaving advocates and industry stakeholders uncertain about the administration’s priorities.
During his campaign, the resident expressed support for rescheduling marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which would move it from Schedule I to Schedule III, easing restrictions on medical use and enabling cannabis businesses to access banking and tax benefits. However, since taking office, no concrete steps have been taken to advance this initiative. A DEA hearing on rescheduling, initially planned for January 2025, was postponed due to procedural appeals and remains unscheduled.
The president has also voiced support for state autonomy in cannabis policy and endorsed state-level legalization initiatives, such as Florida’s failed 2024 ballot measure for recreational marijuana. While this reflects a more favorable stance compared to his first term, his administration has yet to prioritize federal reforms like the SAFE Banking Act, which would facilitate banking services for cannabis businesses. Efforts to include such measures in a government funding bill late last year were unsuccessful.
The delay in federal action has significant implications for the cannabis industry. Rescheduling marijuana could alleviate financial burdens by eliminating restrictions under IRS Code Section 280E and promoting medical research. However, the stalled process leaves businesses navigating regulatory uncertainties and limited financial access.
While stakeholders continue lobbying for reform, the administration appears focused on other priorities such as immigration and foreign policy. Advocates hope the President will leverage his influence to advance cannabis reform, but for now, the issue remains sidelined. Until then the industry struggles and waits.
States are starting to scramble with looming budget deficients, but marijuana is a boon to some – especially one state.
The new federal administration is revamping how the government operates. With Doge, they are changing agencies and reducing services and support of states, which has left budget deficients in many. But some states have legal marijana and it has been a boon, for like alcohol…people are still consuming. States who are fully legal are making more money on weed than booze and this state’s cannabis revenue keeps pouring in. Missouri, the show me state, is being shown unexpected revenue.
“Due to a strong cannabis market and effective, efficient regulation of that market,” Amy Moore, director of the Missouri Division of Cannabis Regulation, told The Independent this week, “the funds available for the ultimate beneficiaries of the cannabis regulatory program continue to outpace expectations.”
Funds will help veterans and other key projects. The other benefit is as seen in data from legal states, teen use is down so it frees up some other funds. Legal states are seeing benefits from legal cannabis including lower teen use and crime reduction.
States with legal cannabis are experiencing a significant boost in tax revenue, surpassing those generated by alcohol sales. This trend highlights the economic benefits of marijuana legalization, as cannabis markets expand and mature.
In California, cannabis excise taxes have consistently outperformed alcohol-related taxes, bringing in over double the revenue. Colorado has seen even more striking results, with marijuana tax revenues totaling seven times those of alcohol. Similarly, Massachusetts has collected more tax revenue from marijuana than alcohol since fiscal year 2021, marking a notable shift in state finances.
Nationally, legal cannabis states generated nearly $3 billion in excise taxes on marijuana in 2021—20% more than alcohol taxes. By 2024, total adult-use cannabis tax revenue exceeded $20 billion, with states like Illinois and Washington reporting record-breaking contributions. Illinois alone collected $451.9 million from cannabis taxes in fiscal year 2022—one-and-a-half times the revenue from alcohol.
The funds are being put to good use. States like Illinois are channeling marijuana tax dollars into mental health services and community programs, while Colorado has invested nearly $500 million into public education. California has allocated millions to nonprofits addressing the impacts of the war on drugs.
This growing revenue stream underscores the potential of cannabis legalization to support vital public services and bolster state economies. As more states embrace regulated marijuana markets, the financial benefits are expected to continue flourishing.
The federal administration is all over the board around fed cannabis policy…and millions of patients are worried.
The industry employees over 440,000 workers at all lives and is driven in a large part by mom and pop businesses. Millions use medical marijuana for health issues ranging from chronic pain to sleep. But there are mixed messages from the feds about cannabis, and people are very worried. The federal government’s stance on marijuana has become increasingly complex, as recent developments show conflicting approaches to the drug’s potential benefits and risks. On one hand, there’s a push for research into medical marijuana for veterans, while on the other, a campaign against cannabis use is being launched.
The juxtaposition of initiatives highlights the federal government’s inconsistent approach to marijuana policy. While some departments are exploring the potential benefits of cannabis, others are actively working to discourage its use. This dichotomy is further exemplified by ongoing legislative efforts. For instance, Rep. Brian Mast (R-FL) has reintroduced the Veterans Equal Access Act, which would allow VA doctors to recommend medical marijuana to patients in states where it’s legal. Meanwhile, documents from an ongoing lawsuit suggest that the DEA may have weighted the marijuana rescheduling process to ensure rejection of moving the drug from Schedule 1 to Schedule 3.
Photo by yavdat/Getty Images
The Department of Defense (DOD) has allocated nearly $10 million in funding for research into the therapeutic potential of MDMA for active-duty military members. This initiative, driven by congressional efforts, aims to explore MDMA’s effectiveness in treating conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Rep. Morgan Luttrell (R-TX) expressed pride in this development, stating that it could be a “game-changer” for service members battling these combat-related injuries.
Additionally, a bipartisan effort in Congress has been pushing for VA research on medical marijuana for PTSD and other conditions affecting veterans. The VA Medicinal Cannabis Research Act, introduced in both the Senate and House, would mandate studies on how cannabis affects the use of addictive medications and impacts various health outcomes for veterans.
In stark contrast to these research initiatives, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has partnered with an anti-cannabis nonprofit to launch a social media campaign targeting young people. The campaign, set to run ahead of April 20 (4/20), aims to “flood” Instagram with anti-cannabis content. The DEA is offering monetary incentives to students for creating and posting anti-THC videos, with payments ranging from $25 to $50 depending on the type of content produced.
This approach has raised eyebrows, as it seems to contradict the growing acceptance and legalization of marijuana across the United States. Critics argue that such campaigns may be out of touch with current societal trends and scientific understanding of cannabis.