Cannabis News

High Tide to open two new locations in Ontario

Published

10 months ago

August 27, 2025

admin

Cannabon Cannabis Cannabis Cannabis Cannabis, 29, 2025, Cannabis Cannabis, Cannabis Cannabis will begin to sell adult use and additional consumer supplements on 4 September 2025. These openings are a total of seafarers in Canna Canna Canna Canna and 86 ontario province.

“New openings in Burlington and London reflect our national footprints at carefully selected sites, the ability to pay attention to the members of our Cabana Club.

“Beyond Canada, it will be the start of our coming closing closing chapter. It will be located as a global cannabis company with a significant retail and distribution scale. It is the best option for home and abroad, added,” Grover.

The company’s new Burlington location is anchored by a national hardware store and has completed a strong mix of fast service restaurants. Located at the northern end of the city, the location provides access to nearly 41,000 inhabitants in radius of three kilometers. The store also comes from a nearby competition, including destination retailers, including main food and drugs, to improve long-location potential.

The company’s new London location is strategically located in a field that does not overlap with Canna Cabana stores and a very limited competition around it. This site provides access to future residential development, which will become one of the city’s growth and the highest income neighborhood. Part of a new retail hub anchored by national schools, drugs and fast service restaurants, the location is ready for the benefit of strong daily traffic. With more than 25,000 inhabitants, two competitors located in five minutes and the south, this new store is a strong opportunity to implement the premature presence of Canna Cabana and implement long-term growth in this promising region of London.

For more information:
Tower
(Protected by email)
hightideyinc.com

Related Topics:High locations Ontario open Tide

Up Next

Military To Start Testing Service Members For The Psychedelic Psilocin, Memo Shows

Don't Miss

More than doubled our drying capacity

Cannabis News

AWH files DEA registration applications

Published

13 hours ago

July 2, 2026

admin

Ascend Wellness has filed applications with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration to register certain state-licensed medical cannabis operations under Schedule III medical marijuana.

“This is an important first step for medical cannabis patients and the medical community, while laying the groundwork for broader standardization across the industry,” said Sam Brill, CEO of AWH. “We remain hopeful about what might come next as the DEA’s hearing on adult-use cannabis rescheduling continues. Further reforms will help establish a more level playing field for cannabis operators and align the industry with more economic opportunities and regulatory frameworks available to traditional businesses.”

Applications include dispensary operations to support medical cannabis patients in the Company’s core markets. AWH’s footprint spans 51 retail locations in seven states, including partner-owned and operated stores, and occupies more than 260,000 square feet in its six cultivation, processing and manufacturing facilities.

For more information:
Ascend Wellness Holdings
www.awholdings.com

Cannabis News

Arizona Bill To Punish People Over ‘Excessive’ Marijuana Odor Or Smoke Dies As Session Adjourns

Published

13 hours ago

July 2, 2026

admin

An Arizona bill that would have It has penalized people who produce “excessive” amounts of marijuana smoke or smell is dead, for advocates who have said it is to defeat a proposal that would have weakened the legalization law.

The legislation by Sen. JD Mesnard (R) passed the Senate in March, as well as the House Judiciary Committee, but stalled on the floor despite support from Republican and Democratic groups in the House, after an objection to the approval of the consensus schedule.

Members of Parliament adjourned the legislative session on June 13, before taking up the proposal on the regular schedule, officially killing it for the year.

Throughout the measure’s history, lawmakers have heard testimony from both sides of the debate, with advocates arguing that it is a necessary update to the state statute that would prevent unsolicited exposure to the smell of cannabis, and opponents, such as Arizona NORML and the ACLU of Arizona, arguing that it unnecessarily undermines the will of voters who voted to legalize the proposal.

Mesnard, the bill’s sponsor, addressed criticism of the proposal, including the possibility that it could be subject to political litigation if it eventually becomes law, at a House committee hearing in March.

“I don’t think we should feel paralyzed as politicians to advance the right policy that protects someone’s private property rights,” he said. “Anyone can challenge anything we do down here, and it’s often used to try to stop the way we make decisions. I don’t think it should be in this case.”

He also explained to a member of the House panel that the bill would not force local governments to adopt their own rules or take enforcement action.

“Some cities or towns can get something, some can’t. This is protection if they don’t have something,” the senator said. “Obviously, it’s something that’s easier at the local level – and usually the objections are faced at the local level – so it’s not trying to interfere with the most common approach.”

Another subsidiary resolution to put the issue up to voters failed in the Senate, but Mesnard later made a successful motion to reconsider that failure, although the measure was not brought up again.

As introduced, both measures would add broad criminalization provisions to state cannabis use laws. But most of that penalty language was revised Senate Committees of the Whole. For example, it was changed to provide a clearer definition of “excessive” smoking and to remove the reference to making the offense a “felony.”

The Senate-passed bill, however, would make it a public nuisance by making it punishable by up to four months in jail and a $750 fine for “excessive marijuana smoke or odor … if the person’s conduct willfully or knowingly and substantially interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property.”

The final definition of excess cannabis smoke or odor described it as “air emissions from smoking, heating, or vaporizing marijuana or marijuana products,” according to a summary of the approved amendment.

Such emissions “can be detected by a reasonable person of ordinary sensibility on other private property” and “occur for no more than 30 consecutive minutes in a single period or on three or more days within a 30-day period.”

invoice (SB 1725) and resolution (SCR 1048) specified in their final form: “The legal possession or use of marijuana does not preclude a finding of nuisance, except that a court may consider the possession of a valid registration identification card as a mitigating factor,” and they provide that “a person is not liable for a private nuisance unless the person receives notice of the interference within five days.”

Under the revised legislation, an aggrieved party would first have to file a complaint with local officials before taking action with the state, but only if the city has passed an ordinance regulating the excessive smoke or smell of cannabis.

A person would be deemed to be in violation of the law if a local court orders them to “reduce the excessive smoke or odor of marijuana that causes a tint” and the person “knowingly violates or refuses to comply with the order.”

Each subsequent day of non-compliance with the order would be considered a separate offense, and non-compliance would be a minor offence.

—
It’s Marijuana Time tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters by pledging at least $25/month, you’ll get access to our interactive maps, charts, and audio calendars so you never miss a development.

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracking and become a Patreon supporter to gain access
—

Separately, Marijuana opponents introduced a ballot initiative to roll back legalization in Arizona this year, but that effort was abandoned after the local campaign leader said he has “adjusted my views on the threat to children” posed by the legal marijuana industry.

Sean Noble, president of the political strategy firm American Encore, told local media that as he began campaigning over concerns about the marketing of cannabis to children, he realized that marijuana businesses in Arizona “didn’t do some things that I thought they did.”

“I went in with a very deep belief that this was happening,” Noble said. “I relied on things I saw or read from other people.”

“I don’t think they’re marketing it the way I was led to believe they were doing gummies and candy and stuff like that,” he said. “Maybe they’re doing that in other states. But it’s not happening here in Arizona.”

A The 2024 poll found continued majority support From Arizona, it is likely to legalize medical cannabis (86 percent), legalize adult use (69 percent) and the industry for banking reform (78 percent).

Meanwhile, seniors in Arizona’s independent living communities may soon see another type of caregiving service available in their neighborhoods: Kiosks that allow you to view and purchase marijuana products at licensed dispensaries.

Retailer Life Is Chill and cannabis technology company LoveBud recently announced a partnership to launch the novel initiative, which will deploy kiosks in participating senior living communities that residents can use to deliver and order marijuana products.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Cannabis News

German state authority says cannabis flower must be dried where it’s grown, tightening the screws on EU GMP washing

Published

2 days ago

July 1, 2026

admin

In Hesse, medicinal cannabis flowers must be dried and cut where the plants are harvested, the Hessian State Office for Health and Care says in a June 8 guidance letter, unless a grower can prove beyond doubt that skipping or splitting the drying does not result in a loss of quality.

The document treats drying under controlled conditions as a critical manufacturing step that affects product quality, which places its parameters within GMP standards rather than the more lenient GACP standard that governs cultivation (source: HLfGP brochure). Annex 7 of the GMP guideline allows coarse cutting and possibly a primary drying step under GACP conditions, but only when the work actually falls within these limits and the quality of the drug is not compromised. The authority says it does not have a process that has allowed flowers that can be classified as GACP material to be transported over long distances, stored, imported and further processed without loss of quality. Either the requirements for GACP flower are not met because the handling goes beyond the initial drying and coarse cutting, or the flower cannot be shown to survive longer storage and transport without degrading before subsequent steps.

What a third country allows does not change that. According to the authority, if the cannabis flower is partially manufactured in a country where the GMP guideline does not apply, the guidelines must still be met for material released and sold as medicine in Germany. The responsibility lies with the Qualified Person under the German Medicinal Products Act who releases the flower for sale, and is responsible, even if partial manufacturing takes place in sites operating under different regulations in other EU states or third countries.

This is the mechanism behind EU GMP clearance, the practice of converting imported flowers through a European facility to obtain certification that the original material would not otherwise carry. The Hesse letter does not use that term. What it does is to close the interpretation loophole that allows a partial dry abroad to be finished and certified in Europe, by calling the dry finish a GMP step that cannot be cleared through a GACP origin.

The policy also restricts reprocessing. According to Chapter 5 of the EU GMP guideline, reprocessing is only possible in exceptional cases, under strictly defined conditions and a full risk assessment, which includes drying or reducing the microbial load. Batches undergoing such steps cannot be sold without proof of suitability and stability, and when rework is applied to most batches, it should become a validated part of the standard process.

A producer active in the supply chain, who asked not to be named, says the Hesse letter is one of two recent moves, covering the second-issued Darmstadt district, in line with the regions already taking a stand against EU GMP clearance in Cologne. In the accounts of this grower, the regions have closed the loophole that allowed partial drought in a country like Colombia to end in Germany, Darmstadt has refused to allow this conversion in its territory.

The most difficult case, according to this producer, is the multi-country chain. The flower partially processed in Colombia, sent to Portugal and converted there according to the EU GMP is still something that Germany completely rejects, although it should be caught by a qualified person who does the job properly, and a chain that goes to a third country, according to the producer’s estimates, approximately ninety percent is not allowed. Qualified people have more responsibility than before, and when they check the supply line and find the chain invalid, the Darmstadt regional authority would look into it.