Cannabis News
Hop Latent Viroid Pathogen Perspectives
Hop Latent Viroid Perspectives – Origins, Greed, and other perspectives
https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/13s19mo/comment/jloddmt/
For those who have been reading our work here at Cannabis.net – you should be “somewhat” savvy on “The Hop Latent Viroid” that has cost billions of dollars in losses to the cannabis industry.
If you haven’t heard of it, let me provide you with a quick introduction to the topic as the purpose of this article is to go beyond that and listen to what industry experts have to say about it. Well, people who work in the field.
Here’s a snippet from another article here on Cannabis.net by Joseph Billions;
The Hop Latent Viroid, also known as HpLVd is a single-stranded infection that depends on the metabolism of its host plant to replicate itself. This Viroid happens globally in “Hops” and can infect the hop’s relative, which is the cannabis plant.
The Viroid is also an infectious pathogen that causes diseases in the marijuana plant. It is often referred to as “Dudding disease,” and sometimes the infected plants are initially asymptomatic (doesn’t show symptoms). This infection can also be dormant in plants for an extended period, and eventually, the symptoms become evident. – Read more
The infection reduces the potency of THC which for the industry is a big deal. However, the purpose of this article is not to discuss the disease itself, but rather the origins, the theories and to tune into the conversation happening in the industry.
According to one Redditor, we can trace the problem of the viroid to greed.
It’s simply a result of an industry living on hype cycles. All those fancy strains are unstable hybrids, which gives more yield and potency, but comes at the cost of basically having to resort to cutlings from a carefully selected mother plant. Compare the root system of plants grown that way to ones grown from seed, and the difference becomes immediately obvious: that thing that looks like a little carrot missing on cutlings is incredibly important for the plant’s immune system. So, not only does the practice of propagating from a mother plant spread the virus, it spreads it to already weakened plants. Sorry, no sympathies there, it’s just the usual mix of greed and stupidity.
And it’s not only greed from growers, it starts with the seed producers. Maturing a strain to stability takes a lot longer than just banging something together for the next competition and slapping a fanciful name on it. Worse, a stable strain will not require people to buy seeds for their next mother again, you just can just produce seeds the old way yourself. Several thousands from a single run, easily. So no more selling seeds in packs of ten for vastly over-inflated prices, you’d actually have to compete on convenience.
The whole industry is after the quick buck and literally reaping what they sow. – Feliz Magnetus
According to this Redditor, the reason why the viroid spread so much, and why it even became such a problem in the first place is due to greed. By trying to optimize the natural cycles and to engage in pure cloning, you destabilize the genetics and create opportunities for pathogens to go ham.
However, not everyone agrees with opinion as illustrated here;
Liquid_At claims it’s CBD;
As a clone producer who successfully manages the viroid I have to partially disagree with the analysis.
Hop Latent Viroid primarily spread through seeds of CBD-Strains during the hype a few years ago. With a little help of pests like mites that spread to areas where they didn’t exist previously due to climate change, the viroid spread around the globe fast.
Since the viroid can easily be spread through seeds, having a clean environment with mother plants and a skilled team working them, is currently the best approach to combat it
There was a lot of greed and stupidity involved, but claiming that clone manufacturers were to blame is easy to debunk. The source of the outbreak is known to be the CBD-Seed-Scene and producers of clones are victims of that.
However, while this is the opinion of a “clone producer”, another redditor chimed in with a different assessment of the root cause of the origins of the viroid.
From what I have seen hop latent’s spread in the hydro industry is multifaceted. Part of it comes from the human vectors: cutting tools not being disinfected between plants. Another part comes from the communal “foot baths” used in many hydro settings: flood trays, drip systems, etc. in which the virus spreads at the root level, partly from the higher concentration found there.
moreover, the distribution of the viroid was tissue-specific, being lower in the stem apex and higher in roots, and showed a negative correlation with the nuclease activity (Matousek et al., 1995).
I have heard of entire grows being decimated by hop latent despite having been warned by consultants: a lead grower who says “no, that’s something else,” only to have their crop ruined because they’re growing more virus from their horticultural practices.
The industrialization of any crop is bound to have these sorts of things happen, and the approach taken within the cannabis industry has been conducive towards the spread of hop latent. Be thankful it’s not a tobamovirus like tobacco mosaic virus, which would make disinfection and starting over well nigh impossible without throwing out every article used in production. – TDZ12
This is an important point. Once a tobacco plant is infected with tobamovirus, it shows various symptoms. The most common symptom is the appearance of mosaic patterns on the leaves, which gives the virus its name “tobacco mosaic virus” (TMV). The leaves develop mottled or patchy discoloration, similar to a mosaic artwork. Other symptoms may include stunted growth, distortion of leaves, and reduced yield.
The impact of tobamovirus on tobacco crops is significant. The virus affects the quality and quantity of the harvested tobacco leaves. Infected plants may produce smaller leaves, and the overall yield can be reduced. Additionally, the virus affects the curing process, which is essential for developing the desired flavor and aroma of tobacco. Curing infected leaves can be challenging, and the final product may have a lower quality and value.
Fortunately, the Viroid isn’t as dangerous as TMV, yet this doesn’t meant that it can’t tank an industry that relies on shotty genetics to make it’s money.
In conclusion, the Hop Latent Viroid has had a significant impact on the cannabis industry, causing billions of dollars in losses. While there are different perspectives on the origins and causes of the viroid’s spread, there are a few educated guesses we can make based on the information provided.
One perspective suggests that the viroid’s spread can be attributed to greed within the industry. The focus on creating unstable hybrid strains and relying on cuttings from a selected mother plant, rather than stable seeds, has destabilized genetics and created opportunities for pathogens to thrive. This perspective places blame on both growers and seed producers who prioritize quick profits over long-term stability.
However, another viewpoint suggests that the viroid primarily spread through CBD seeds during a hype period a few years ago. Other vectors, and the introduction of pests like mites, aided by the spread of seeds, facilitated the rapid global spread of the viroid. According to this perspective, clone manufacturers are seen as victims rather than culprits, as they are not responsible for the initial outbreak but have been affected by it.
There is also a discussion on the role of human vectors in the viroid’s transmission, such as the lack of disinfection between plants and the use of communal systems like flood trays and drip systems. These practices in the hydroponic industry have contributed to the spread of the viroid, highlighting the consequences of industrialization and the need for better horticultural practices.
Overall, the exact origin and primary cause of the Hop Latent Viroid’s spread remain speculative, but it seems to be a combination of various factors including unstable genetics, seed distribution, and horticultural practices. It is clear that the industry’s focus on quick profits and inadequate measures to control the viroid have played a role in its widespread impact. To mitigate further damage, it is crucial for the cannabis industry to prioritize stable genetics, implement proper disinfection protocols, and adopt better cultivation practices.
MORE ON HLV PATHOGEN SPREADING, READ ON…
WHAT IS HOP LATENT VIROID AND WHY ARE CANNABIS PLANTS IN TROUBLE?
A cannabis store in Revelstoke, British Columbia, has been fined $1,000 for selling products at a 50% discount, violating provincial regulations. The Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch (LCRB) determined that the sale breached rules against selling cannabis below cost. The penalty was issued following a hearing in October, with the fine due by November 23, 2024. This incident highlights ongoing regulatory scrutiny in the cannabis industry as it navigates complex pricing laws.
The trouble began when Fresh Cannabis Co. Inc., operating as Cost Cannabis, advertised a massive sale on all products and accessories, slashing prices by half. This promotion caught the attention of the LCRB after a complaint was lodged on April 22, 2024. An inspector visited the store just days later to investigate whether the store was indeed selling cannabis below the minimum prices set by the government.
During the inspection on April 25, the inspector asked about four specific products, and staff confirmed that their sale prices were lower than their listed prices. However, when asked for documentation regarding their purchase prices, the store could not provide it at that moment. This lack of transparency raised further concerns.
After a thorough investigation that included requests for sales records and inventory lists, it became clear that Cost Cannabis was selling products below both the price they paid to the provincial distributor and the wholesale price. The LCRB’s ruling emphasized that such practices could lead to public safety issues, including over-consumption and loss of control among consumers.
Regulations surrounding cannabis sales in British Columbia
The regulations surrounding cannabis sales in British Columbia are designed to create a safe and stable market. The LCRB enforces rules that prevent retailers from selling cannabis at prices lower than what they paid to ensure fair competition and consumer safety. These measures aim to deter practices that could lead to over-service or over-consumption of cannabis products.
In this case, Dianne Flood, a delegate from the LCRB, noted that the store should have anticipated that a blanket promotion of 50% off would raise red flags for regulators. She pointed out that there was no evidence showing that Cost Cannabis had taken steps to prevent such violations from occurring.
Cost Cannabis Defense
Faced with the fine, Cost Cannabis admitted to violating minimum pricing rules but argued that these regulations do not effectively prevent over-service or over-consumption. They contended that the persistent presence of an illicit market—where cannabis can be purchased at significantly lower prices—poses a greater risk of unsafe consumption than licensed retailers selling below minimum prices.
The store highlighted that many consumers still turn to unregulated sources for their cannabis needs because of price disparities. They claimed this underground market is often more likely to contribute to public safety issues due to potentially tainted products.
Despite their arguments, Flood concluded that the violation had been proven and imposed a $1,000 fine—the minimum penalty for such an infraction. She stated that first-time violations could result in either a monetary penalty or a short suspension of the business’s license.
Broader Industry Implications
The incident involving Cost Cannabis in Revelstoke, British Columbia, raises significant questions about pricing strategies within the province’s legal cannabis market. As retailers navigate an increasingly competitive landscape, they must find a balance between competitive pricing and regulatory compliance while addressing consumer preferences influenced by a persistent illicit market.
-
The Challenge of Compliance
The fine imposed on Cost Cannabis for selling products at a 50% discount highlights the stringent regulations governing cannabis pricing in British Columbia. Retailers are prohibited from selling cannabis below the price they paid to the government or below the wholesale price. This regulation aims to prevent practices that could lead to over-consumption and protect public safety. However, it also creates challenges for retailers who want to attract customers in a crowded market.
-
Understanding Regulatory Frameworks: Retailers must have a clear understanding of the regulations that govern their pricing strategies. Compliance with minimum pricing laws is crucial not only to avoid penalties but also to maintain their licenses and reputations. Failure to comply can result in fines, as seen in this case, and can damage consumer trust.
-
Strategic Pricing Models: Developing a strategic pricing model that aligns with both regulatory requirements and market expectations is essential. Retailers should conduct thorough market analyses to understand competitor pricing and consumer behavior. This understanding can help them position their products effectively while adhering to legal standards.
-
The Impact of the Illicit Market
The ongoing presence of the illicit cannabis market complicates pricing strategies for legal retailers. Many consumers still turn to unregulated sources for cheaper products, which can undermine the efforts of licensed stores.
-
Consumer Education: Educating consumers about the benefits of purchasing from licensed retailers is vital. Legal products are subject to safety regulations and quality controls that illegal products do not adhere to. Retailers can leverage this information in their marketing strategies to encourage consumers to choose legal options over cheaper illicit alternatives.
-
Advocacy for Regulatory Change: Retailers may need to advocate for changes in regulations that could help level the playing field with the illicit market. This could include lobbying for adjustments in taxation or minimum pricing laws that allow licensed stores more flexibility in their pricing strategies.
-
Long-term Sustainability and Market Dynamics
The fine against Cost Cannabis underscores broader issues related to sustainability and competition within the cannabis industry.
-
Market Stability: Maintaining stable prices is essential for the long-term viability of the legal cannabis market. If retailers engage in aggressive discounting or undercutting each other, it could lead to unsustainable business practices that harm overall profitability.
-
Innovation and Differentiation: To effectively compete against both legal and illegal markets, retailers must focus on innovation and differentiation rather than solely on price competition. Offering unique product lines, exceptional customer service, or creating engaging retail experiences can help draw consumers away from cheaper alternatives.
-
Building Brand Loyalty: Establishing strong brand loyalty can mitigate the impact of price competition. Retailers who cultivate relationships with their customers through loyalty programs, community involvement, and personalized service may find that consumers are willing to pay a premium for trusted products.
Conclusion
The $1,000 fine imposed on Cost Cannabis serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by retailers operating within British Columbia’s legal cannabis framework. As they navigate competitive pressures and regulatory requirements, incidents like this underscore the importance of compliance with provincial laws designed to protect public health and safety.
As British Columbia continues refining its approach to cannabis regulation, ongoing dialogue among regulators, retailers, and consumers will be essential in fostering a sustainable marketplace. This incident not only highlights the complexities of operating within this industry but also emphasizes the need for all stakeholders to work collaboratively toward a safer and more equitable cannabis market in Canada.
FINES FOR PHARMA RUN BIG, READ ON…
Cannabis News
Latest Trump Weed Rumor – Trump Will Federally Deschedule and Decriminalize Cannabis, but Not Legalize It
In a recent interview, former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie made headlines by asserting that President-elect Donald Trump will pursue significant reforms in federal policies regarding marijuana and cryptocurrency. As the nation grapples with evolving attitudes toward cannabis and the burgeoning digital currency market, Christie’s predictions have ignited discussions about the potential implications of such changes on both industries. This article delves into Christie’s insights, the current state of marijuana and cryptocurrency regulations, and the broader implications of these anticipated reforms.
The Current Landscape of Marijuana Legislation
Federal vs. State Laws
Marijuana remains classified as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which places it in the same category as heroin and LSD. This classification has created a complex legal landscape where states have moved to legalize cannabis for medical and recreational use, while federal law continues to impose strict prohibitions. As of now, over 30 states have legalized marijuana in some form, leading to a burgeoning industry that generates billions in revenue.
Challenges Faced by the Cannabis Industry
Despite its legality in many states, the cannabis industry faces significant hurdles due to federal restrictions. These challenges include:
-
Banking Access: Many banks are hesitant to work with cannabis businesses due to fear of federal repercussions, forcing these businesses to operate largely in cash.
-
Taxation Issues: The IRS enforces Section 280E of the tax code, which prohibits businesses engaged in illegal activities from deducting normal business expenses, leading to disproportionately high tax burdens for cannabis companies.
-
Interstate Commerce: The lack of federal legalization prevents cannabis businesses from operating across state lines, limiting their growth potential.
Chris Christie’s Perspective on Marijuana Reform
Christie, a former presidential candidate known for his tough stance on drugs during his tenure as governor, has evolved his views on marijuana over the years. In his recent statements, he emphasized that Trump is likely to pursue descheduling cannabis, which would remove it from the Schedule I classification. This move would not only provide clarity for businesses operating in legal markets but also open avenues for banking and investment.
Christie highlighted that descheduling would allow for a more regulated market where safety standards could be established, thus protecting consumers. He believes that this approach aligns with a growing consensus among Americans who support legalization and recognize the potential benefits of cannabis use for both medical and recreational purposes.
The Future of Cryptocurrency Regulation = The Rise of Cryptocurrencies
Cryptocurrencies have surged in popularity over the past decade, with Bitcoin leading the charge as the first decentralized digital currency. The market has expanded to include thousands of alternative coins (altcoins), each with unique features and use cases. As cryptocurrencies gain traction among investors and consumers alike, regulatory scrutiny has intensified.
Current Regulatory Challenges
The cryptocurrency market faces several regulatory challenges that hinder its growth and adoption:
-
Lack of Clarity: Regulatory frameworks vary significantly across states and countries, creating confusion for investors and businesses.
-
Fraud and Scams: The rapid growth of cryptocurrencies has led to an increase in fraudulent schemes targeting unsuspecting investors.
-
Consumer Protection: Without clear regulations, consumers are often left vulnerable to risks associated with volatile markets.
Christie’s Vision for Crypto Regulation
Christie believes that under Trump’s leadership, there will be an effort to find a “sweet spot” for cryptocurrency regulation balancing innovation with consumer protection. He argues that overly stringent regulations could stifle growth in this emerging sector while too little oversight could expose consumers to significant risks.
In his view, a balanced regulatory framework would include:
1. Clear Definitions: Establishing clear definitions for different types of cryptocurrencies and tokens to differentiate between securities and utility tokens.
2. Consumer Protections: Implementing measures to protect investors from fraud while promoting transparency within the market.
3. Encouraging Innovation: Creating an environment conducive to innovation by allowing startups to thrive without excessive regulatory burdens.
Christie’s insights reflect a growing recognition among policymakers that cryptocurrencies are here to stay and that appropriate regulations are necessary to foster growth while safeguarding consumers.
Implications of Proposed Reforms
Economic Impact
The potential reforms proposed by Christie could have far-reaching economic implications:
-
Job Creation: Legalizing marijuana at the federal level could lead to significant job creation within the cannabis industry—from cultivation and production to retail sales.
-
Investment Opportunities: Descheduling cannabis would open up investment opportunities for institutional investors who have been hesitant due to federal restrictions.
-
Boosting Local Economies: Legal cannabis markets have proven beneficial for local economies through increased tax revenues and job creation.
Similarly, clear regulations around cryptocurrencies could stimulate investment in blockchain technology and related industries, fostering innovation and economic growth.
Social Justice Considerations
Both marijuana legalization and sensible cryptocurrency regulations have social justice implications:
-
Addressing Past Injustices: Legalizing marijuana could help rectify past injustices related to drug enforcement policies that disproportionately affected marginalized communities.
-
Financial Inclusion: Cryptocurrencies offer opportunities for financial inclusion for those underserved by traditional banking systems, particularly in low-income communities.
Political Landscape
The political landscape surrounding these issues is complex. While there is bipartisan support for marijuana reform among certain lawmakers, challenges remain in overcoming entrenched opposition. Similarly, cryptocurrency regulation has garnered attention from both sides of the aisle but requires collaboration to establish effective frameworks.
Conclusion
Chris Christie’s predictions about President-elect Donald Trump’s approach to federal marijuana descheduling and cryptocurrency regulation suggest a potential shift in U.S. policy that could significantly reshape both industries. As public opinion evolves on these issues, lawmakers have an opportunity to enact meaningful reforms that promote economic growth while ensuring consumer protection. The anticipated changes could foster a more robust cannabis industry that contributes positively to the economy and addresses social justice concerns, while clear regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies could encourage innovation and protect consumers in the digital economy. Stakeholders in both sectors are closely watching these developments, eager to see how potential reforms might impact their futures. While the realization of Christie’s predictions remains uncertain, it’s clear that the conversation around marijuana and cryptocurrency regulation is ongoing and far from settled.
TRUMP 2.0 ON CANNABIS REFORM, READ ON…
TRUMP 2.0 ON FEDERAL CANNABIS REFORM – WHAT DO WE KNOW?
Margin Compression Madness – $1,000 Fine for Selling Weed at Too Low of a Price?
Driving Under The Influence of THC In Vermont
Long shot adult-use legalization effort launches in anti-marijuana Idaho
Latest Trump Weed Rumor – Trump Will Federally Deschedule and Decriminalize Cannabis, but Not Legalize It
Webinar Replay: Post-Election Cannabis Wrap – Smoke ’em if You’ve Got ’em
I Had Just One Puff
Marijuana firms Eaze, Green Dragon find new life after $10 million capital infusion
Get some rest on Modified Grapes—November’s Leafly HighLight
Is Kratom Addictive? Understanding Dependence, Risks, and Safe Usage
New Rule, December 5: Oregon Cannabis Retailers, Processors and Labor Peace Agreements
Distressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™
United States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)
What you Need to Know
Drug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog
NCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program
It has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax
Cannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022
A new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse
Your Go-To Source for Cannabis Logos and Designs
UArizona launches online cannabis compliance online course
-
Cannabis News2 years agoDistressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™
-
One-Hit Wonders2 years agoUnited States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)
-
Cannabis 1012 years agoWhat you Need to Know
-
drug testing11 months agoDrug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog
-
Education2 years agoNCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program
-
Cannabis2 years agoIt has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax
-
Marijuana Business Daily2 years agoCannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022
-
California2 years agoA new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse