Connect with us

Featured

Marijuana Retail Report

Published

on

Marijuana Retail Report




We continue to represent many buyers and sellers of OLCC marijuana licenses. At any given time, we run 10-12 such transactions, and sometimes more, as we have done over the years. There have been a few changes recently that are worth noting, especially regarding OLCC protocols. I will also briefly touch on other market dynamics.

OLCC Updates

a. Quick assignment of tasks

Gone are the days when buyers and sellers would wait months to hear back from an OLCC investigator after filing a change of ownership application. OLCC “processing dates” page. reports that applications for change of ownership are now being assigned and processed until September 3, 2025. This is not true. Over the past month or so, we have seen a number of applications set within a week or two of submission. They move fast.

b. Completed applications are required

OLCC Licensing Officers have begun pre-screening applications and are returning applications that lack the required documents. The old practice of applicants uploading filler documents will no longer be accepted. The idea here is to ensure that organized applicants are not forced to wait in line behind their unorganized counterparts, creating a bottleneck. In the future, incomplete applications will be delivered to the assignment queue only after all missing documents have been provided.

c. The 60-day appointment period expires

In case you missed it, the OLCC filed a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking September 25, 2025. The main aim was to comply with the 2025 legislation, but some technical updates were also made. These include OAR 845-025-1135(2)(A) and (B), which provide that applicants:

“…must complete the application process within 60 calendar days after the Commission notifies the applicant that the application has been designated,” and that “if the applicant does not complete the application process within 60 calendar days, the application will be canceled and suspended.”

Getting into such purgatory is a dangerous game. Most purchase agreements have cancellation periods, deposit forfeiture provisions, and other negative consequences for buyers, particularly those who fail to move forward properly. On the seller’s side, the downloaded program can be disruptive if there are problems with the landlord or if the seller has given the keys to management contract— something people still do regularly, often against advice.

d. Limited inspectors

We have recently experienced some delays with the availability of an OLCC inspector. There are probably not many of them. Several are also designed for large areas, making planning a challenge. Things tend to slow down around the end of the year holidays as well. When there is a change of ownership, final inspections are usually required by both the buyer and the seller, and the parties should be flexible.

Different market dynamics

a. Buyer’s market

Too many OLCC license and business sales these days are “fire sales”. Many sellers fail businesses that want to salvage some valuables under duress and leave in a hurry. This gives buyers significant leverage that should continue unabated even as the OLCC improves its processes and despite the ongoing moratorium on new licenses. These market dynamics are the new normal and have been for some time.

b. Brokers

Cannabis transactions in Oregon continue to suffer from unscrupulous or incompetent cannabis dealers brokerswith few exceptions. Every week, buyers and sellers come to us with confusing LOIs, dangerous purchase agreements, stupid leases and other contracts drawn up by brokers, some of whom also purport to act as escrow agents, application consultants and general counsel. We have spoken to these brokers and even filed malpractice complaints; but ultimately buyers and sellers should use common sense here.

c. Buyer profiles

We’ve been seeing a lot of Chinese buyers in the last year or so, following the Eastern European wave of buyers a few years ago. Existing network operators also continue to rake in licenses here and there. At the moment, there is very little action from multi-state operators (MSOs), and it would appear that Canadian public companies are not interested.

Stay tuned

I’ll touch on all of this again at the end of the year at my annual Oregon Cannabis “The state of the state“. In the meantime, take care and please give us a call if you need help getting or eliminating your Oregon cannabis license.

Source: Legal Canna Blog

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Conversations in Cannabis: Tiffany Chin, CEO of Death Row Cannabis

Published

on

By

Conversations in Cannabis: Tiffany Chin, CEO of Death Row Cannabis

*Audio has been fixed!*

Few figures in the cannabis space embody both cultural heritage and modern innovation Tiffany rank. As the CEO Cannabis deathChin stands at the intersection of heritage and evolution-one of the most iconic, guided by the famous brands in California, in a new era. With a background that combines a deep industry experience with a growing plants with her husband with a sharp understanding of the brand’s authenticity, she helps convert the deadly line from legendary recording ecosystem of lifestyle, rooted in cannabis, culture and creativity.

Under the guidance of the rank, Death Row Cannabis became not just a vehicle for the approval of celebrities – it is a platform that respects the West Coast’s heritage, setting new standards on quality, transparency and representation. It moved through the brands through the problems of normative shifts, fierce competition and public control, honoring the heritage of the death records and its powerful connection with the history of hip-hop.

But the role of the rank goes beyond the brand management. It plays an important role in demonstrating how authenticity provides success in the cannabis sector – especially when celebrities are involved. Instead of relying solely on the name, it focuses on the development of long -term stability and the development of real relationships with consumers who care about what in their product as much as it is.

I am proud to have the opportunity to talk to Tiffany to discuss the state of the industry and how celebrities play a role. This interview has been recorded further April 8, 2025.

We would like to thank Tiffany for her time in today’s episode. For more information about Death Row Cannabis, don’t forget to visit them online at the Internet www.deathrowcannabis.co. This will do this for us today, thank you again for listening and, as always, make sure you keep track of the next episode on the conversations in the cannabis

Message Talks in Cannabis: Tiffany Chin, CEO of Death Row Cannabis appeared first further Retail Marijuana Retail Report – News and Information for Cannabis sellers.

(Tagstotranslate) submitted

Continue Reading

Best Practices

Conversations in Cannabis: Martin Anker, CEO & Founder of SANlight

Published

on

By

Conversations in Cannabis: Martin Anker, CEO & Founder of SANlight

Martin Anker is the main executive director A sanitial lightA leading Austrian company specializing in high -performance LED lanterns for gardening and growing indoors. San Svetlo, founded in Sruna, Vorarlberg became a global innovator under the guidance of anchor, known for combining advanced lighting technologies with sustainability and science of plants. With the basis of engineering and admiration for both technologies and gardening, Anker managed the company to develop advanced LED solutions, which maximize the minimization of energy consumption and the trusted partner for both professional cultivators and producers around the world.

In addition to supervision of products, Anker posted Sanlight as a caregiver and lawyer in the agricultural space, which is controlled by the environment. It regularly participates in industry conferences, exhibitions and expert panels, where it emphasizes the importance of efficiency, quality and design, which is managed by research, in the field of cultivation. His vision helped Sanlis earn recognition not only as a leading manufacturer of Red systems, but also as a leader of thought that forms the future of sustainable agriculture and plant lighting technology.

I sat down with Martin to discuss the recent Sanlight extension in the US and A2Z what the Pop plant does. All this and much more in this episode of talking on the cannabis.

We would like to thank Martin for the time he was in today’s episode. You can find out more about Sanlight by visiting them online at www.sanlight.com. This will do this for us today, as always, thank you for listening and make sure you keep track of the next episode here about the conversations in the cannabis.

Message Talks in Cannabis: Martin Anker, CEO and Founder Sanlight appeared first further Retail Marijuana Retail Report – News and Information for Cannabis sellers.

(Tagstotranslate) Talking in Cannabis (T) provided podcast (T)

Continue Reading

Best Practices

Marijuana Retail Report

Published

on

By

Marijuana Retail Report



This can happen in the “next few weeks”

Last week President Trump – told reporters What his administration considered the opportunity to transfer marijuana and will be determined within the next few weeks. It was good to hear the update on this issue because everything stopped since Trump took office in January. Of course, the cannabis industry used to work in a suspended state; But losing the momentum is difficult.

I do not predict whether the marijuana will be reorienting on the III schedule, according to HHS’s recommendations And Biden’s plan, whether we get the worst or best result. Instead, I’m going to explain how it should work. There are four basic paths:

  1. restore the process of delaying norms to accept the proposal of the last year by place marijuana in schedule III;
  2. Start a new process of development of norms, presumably with the new proposed rule;
  3. Hearing of the Novokny norms Jettison in general, and Doj simply publishes the final rule by placing marijuana on schedule III (or anywhere); or
  4. Do nothing. Say: “We like marijuana where she is, science and The contracts will be cursed

I will give some high -level thoughts about each of these paths below. However, one thing to apply to the beginning is often a re-fiction that Trump could simply re-re-decide marijuana through the executive order. He can’t. However, he could send the process, like Biden, when Biden issued an executive order 2022, sending HHS to revise marijuana control status. Essentially, Trump could say what he wanted to see, and this would probably happen, especially given the strict loyalty that DOJ showed.

Option 1: Restore Development Development process

Trump could manage Doj and Dea to restore A scary competition redevelopment of marijuana. There are several questions with this. For the first time, the application of the norms was configured from the route, to a large extent with the bad behavior of DEA. Secondly, the judge who oversees the process has retired, and Doj now holds the post that the judges of administrative law are unconstitutional. Third, this process, which is essentially a lawsuit, can pull further and further. If Trump’s administration decides what he wants marijuana somewhere except the schedule and I don’t think they will like it.

Option 2: Start a new process development process

Trump can send Doj to issue a new message proposed by placement of marijuana on III or some other schedule. Doj may claim that the previous process has been improved and/or spoiled, and lost any legitimacy veneer. This justification is likely to resist control, but I’m not sure it can be obtained from another circus involved, especially depending on the recent HHS recommendations. And again, Doj Trump is declining from administrative judges.

Option 3: No more hearings; straight to the final rule

I explained in the previous message that:

CSA “Welsh” General Prosecutor Has Powers “Schedule, Post or Deconerol” (21 USC 811 (A)). The Attorney General traditionally delegated this power to the DEA administrator (28 CFR 0.100). However, the Prosecutor General also retains the powers to plan drugs within CSA in “first instance” (28 USC 509. 510).

(Merick) Garlend had to do so. Instead – noted On the day when HHS made a recommendation to overpay. Garland’s decision is also excited Nest of the Horos of Tired Legal Arguments Around the delegation, whether Dea should be a fan here, etc.

If Trump’s administration decides to move marijuana, Doj must simply write the final rule. The marijuana can then go to the III schedule (either anywhere) within 30 or 60 days of publication. People could consider this rule confident. Considering the power of HHS, however, the clear authorized authority that stands for Doj seems like a heavy battle.

Option 4: Do nothing; marijuana stays on the schedule I

To me, this seems more likely than 1 or 2 options; and less likely than option 3. I say that with low confidence, remember you. I don’t know what’s going on behind the scenes.

If the Trump administration decides to leave marijuana where it is, then the ball returned to Congress. CSA leads to Congress the possibility of re -drug re -executives, of course, in parallel to the executive power. Congressman Greg Steb (R-FL) again filed his “Marijuana law from 1 to 3” Last weekIt will require the Prosecutor General to transfer marijuana to the III schedule within 60 days after passing. This is one potential bill.

If the Doj is not instructed to write the final rule, I would like Trump administration to demand Congress to take this and Congress to do it. As my colleague Jason AdeLston explained recently“Unlike the executive power, Congress can create a solid legal base for marijuana that protects the industry from regulation.”

As said Jake BarnesDon’t it think really?

Source: Blog Law Canna

(Tagstotranslate) Donald Trump (T) Attached (T) Federal (T) redevelopment

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media