Connect with us

News

Marijuana Retail Report

Published

on

Marijuana Retail Report



89% of buyers said they would buy again at a competitive price

Exclusive data from a new, commissioned survey Swedenprovides cannabis retailers with critical information on customer behavior at the height of the critical Q4 season. Evidence shows that AI-powered digital amenities combined with expert budtender recommendations lead to a more profitable and loyal customer experience.

A survey found that 86% of cannabis consumers would be loyal to a particular dispensary if it offered personalized recommendations. Across the cannabis industry, personalized recommendations are becoming more tailored and specific thanks to advances in AI-powered retail software – such as Sweed’s all-in-one intelligent platform – that connects both shopper and shopper with useful information for each individual customer.

The survey also shows that digital convenience is very important to consumers, with 71% of customers saying they enjoy shopping with in-store kiosks and screens, such as Sweed’s new AI-powered display. Other digital tools also play an important role, as the survey found that 75% prefer easy one-click order changes, 72% want the ability to pre-order online, and 67% say delivery options are very important.

Data from the Sweed Shopper Survey gives cannabis retailers a clear picture of what to think about heading into the holiday season.

A survey commissioned by c Swedenby the leading enterprise retail technology platform for the cannabis industry, was conducted to provide cannabis retailers with valuable data to consider and implement ahead of the industry’s important shopping holiday, Green Wednesday, which has historically been one of the most profitable and competitive times in the industry. The survey found that about half, 45% of cannabis users (or about 50 million adults) plan to stock up or make special trips to the dispensary on Green Wednesday.

The survey results underscore the growing trend toward personalization-driven cannabis consumer loyalty. This trend reflects the huge leaps that dispensaries have begun to offer AI-based tools, using customer information to offer product recommendations that most accurately reflect shoppers’ interests.

Sweed is considered a pioneer in cannabis retail in combining AI-powered customer insights with effective customer interactions, using data to personalize recommendations, promotions and ultimately better inform shoppers. Sweed bridging the gap between AI tools and the trusted expertise of local developers is important as AI does not completely replace the value of expert project developers. According to survey data, cannabis retailers must offer both best-in-class digital amenities and budtender experiences to win over customers:

  • Nearly 9 in 10 (88%) cannabis consumers purchase their products through dispensaries, and the budtender experience plays a key role in shaping both purchasing choices and brand loyalty.
  • 3 out of 4 (76%) dispensary shoppers say that the experience and advice of a specialist directly influences what they buy.
    • This is especially true of Gen Z and Millennials (78%), who are more likely than older generations to rely on these recommendations (versus 73% of Gen X and Boomers).
  • About 9 out of 10 (85%) dispensary shoppers would return to the same dispensary because of the experienced dispensaries.

Building customer loyalty and increasing customer value has historically been a challenge for cannabis retailers, but Sweed’s survey shows how promotions and pricing can help dispensaries retain customers and increase their lifetime value (LTV), especially during critical shopping moments (such as Green Wednesday):

  • 89% of cannabis customers said they would be more likely to be a repeat customer if the dispensary offered competitive prices.
  • 86% said loyalty or rewards programs would also motivate repeat visits.
  • When it comes to what drives purchases, the top motivators are promotions and deals:
    • 77% report that promotions influence their choice of dispensary.
    • 78% say they are encouraged to try new brands or products.
    • 75% indicate they increase their order size during sales.
    • 79% report that discounts even change when they shop, such as shopping early or shopping around a holiday.

“Green Wednesday is one of the biggest cannabis retail moments of the year, and the results of our survey make it clear that retailers who use smarter digital tools and know how to run effective promotions will benefit the most,” said Sweed co-founder Rocco del Prioro. “At Sweed, we’re proud to lead the way with an AI-powered platform that helps dispensaries activate every step of the cannabis revenue optimization flywheel, from increasing reach and enhancing the experience to accelerating sales and driving repeat business. Our mission is to help dispensaries turn moments like Green Wednesday into real growth and long-term customer loyalty.”

Exclusive survey data was commissioned by SWEED Wired researcha trusted third-party consulting firm specializing in one-on-one surveys to study the habits and opinions of average Americans.

More information about the survey can be found at: www.sweedpos.com/resources/help-updates/blog/the-modern-cannabis-retail-roadmap-how-to-win-every-step-of-the-customer-journey.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Marijuana Retail Report

Published

on

By

Marijuana Retail Report




We continue to represent many buyers and sellers of OLCC marijuana licenses. At any given time, we run 10-12 such transactions, and sometimes more, as we have done over the years. There have been a few changes recently that are worth noting, especially regarding OLCC protocols. I will also briefly touch on other market dynamics.

OLCC Updates

a. Quick assignment of tasks

Gone are the days when buyers and sellers would wait months to hear back from an OLCC investigator after filing a change of ownership application. OLCC “processing dates” page. reports that applications for change of ownership are now being assigned and processed until September 3, 2025. This is not true. Over the past month or so, we have seen a number of applications set within a week or two of submission. They move fast.

b. Completed applications are required

OLCC Licensing Officers have begun pre-screening applications and are returning applications that lack the required documents. The old practice of applicants uploading filler documents will no longer be accepted. The idea here is to ensure that organized applicants are not forced to wait in line behind their unorganized counterparts, creating a bottleneck. In the future, incomplete applications will be delivered to the assignment queue only after all missing documents have been provided.

c. The 60-day appointment period expires

In case you missed it, the OLCC filed a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking September 25, 2025. The main aim was to comply with the 2025 legislation, but some technical updates were also made. These include OAR 845-025-1135(2)(A) and (B), which provide that applicants:

“…must complete the application process within 60 calendar days after the Commission notifies the applicant that the application has been designated,” and that “if the applicant does not complete the application process within 60 calendar days, the application will be canceled and suspended.”

Getting into such purgatory is a dangerous game. Most purchase agreements have cancellation periods, deposit forfeiture provisions, and other negative consequences for buyers, particularly those who fail to move forward properly. On the seller’s side, the downloaded program can be disruptive if there are problems with the landlord or if the seller has given the keys to management contract— something people still do regularly, often against advice.

d. Limited inspectors

We have recently experienced some delays with the availability of an OLCC inspector. There are probably not many of them. Several are also designed for large areas, making planning a challenge. Things tend to slow down around the end of the year holidays as well. When there is a change of ownership, final inspections are usually required by both the buyer and the seller, and the parties should be flexible.

Different market dynamics

a. Buyer’s market

Too many OLCC license and business sales these days are “fire sales”. Many sellers fail businesses that want to salvage some valuables under duress and leave in a hurry. This gives buyers significant leverage that should continue unabated even as the OLCC improves its processes and despite the ongoing moratorium on new licenses. These market dynamics are the new normal and have been for some time.

b. Brokers

Cannabis transactions in Oregon continue to suffer from unscrupulous or incompetent cannabis dealers brokerswith few exceptions. Every week, buyers and sellers come to us with confusing LOIs, dangerous purchase agreements, stupid leases and other contracts drawn up by brokers, some of whom also purport to act as escrow agents, application consultants and general counsel. We have spoken to these brokers and even filed malpractice complaints; but ultimately buyers and sellers should use common sense here.

c. Buyer profiles

We’ve been seeing a lot of Chinese buyers in the last year or so, following the Eastern European wave of buyers a few years ago. Existing network operators also continue to rake in licenses here and there. At the moment, there is very little action from multi-state operators (MSOs), and it would appear that Canadian public companies are not interested.

Stay tuned

I’ll touch on all of this again at the end of the year at my annual Oregon Cannabis “The state of the state“. In the meantime, take care and please give us a call if you need help getting or eliminating your Oregon cannabis license.

Source: Legal Canna Blog

Continue Reading

interstate commerce

Marijuana Retail Report

Published

on

By

Marijuana Retail Report



Our friends at Harris Bricken are looking at interstate commerce on the West Coast

A cannabis wholesaler in Oregon late yesterday afternoon Jefferson Packing House Company (JPH) has filed another dormant commerce challenge (DCC) against the state’s protectionist cannabis laws. You can view the complaint here. I say “another” DCC challenge because JPH launched DCC litigation in late 2022; and also because several DCC cannabis lawsuits have been filed in recent years, with some successful recently.

What is the dormant commerce provision and how does it relate to government cannabis programs?

The DCC is an implicit constitutional principle derived from the Commerce Clause. It prohibits states from enacting laws that discriminate against or unduly burden interstate commerce. The DCC applies even where Congress has not enacted a law governing the trade area.

The policy here is to prohibit government protectionism and maintain the competitiveness of open markets. If a statute is discriminatory, the state has the legal burden to justify the local benefits that flow from the statute and to show that the state has no other means of promoting legitimate local goals. If the state fails to do so, if it is held accountable (sued by injured parties), its law will be struck down.

State marijuana programs uniformly prohibit the sale of hemp in and out of state. In many cases, they also contain other exclusionary rules. Chief among these are rules that prohibit non-residents from owning local cannabis businesses. But really the big kahuna is the interstate sale of marijuana.

Ultimately, the fundamental question is this: Does the DCC protect interstate commerce in controlled substances even though Congress prohibits the activity?

What have the courts done with the DCC cannabis lawsuits to date?

It was ambiguous. However, as I review the cases, I would hold that the DCC applies to state marijuana programs and that states cannot enact protectionist laws. Second Circuit Court of Appeals just said that in the case of New York, as does the First Circuit a few years agoas to Maine. Federal District Courts in Maryland and Michigan and Missouri also found that the DCC applies to state and local marijuana programs.

Other courts, such as the Western District of Washington, have ruled otherwise, writing in one case that “citizens have no legitimate interest in participating in the federal illegal market”; and explains in another that declaratory relief was not available for the same reason.

The latter category of cases is still pending: the most compelling here Peridot Tree Inc. against the city of Sacramento. In short, the plaintiffs lost in district court, but appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court in November 2024. The ruling there could have major implications for the JPH case filed last night.

How is the JPH case different in Oregon?

All of the cases mentioned above are a problem for state or local laws that require cannabis business owners to be residents. No one dared to challenge state regulations prohibiting the sale of marijuana outside the state. The JPH case does just that, both for marijuana and for hemp products, which fall under the definition of “articles of marijuana” under Oregon law.

JPH’s reasoning for overturning the ban on interstate sales is similar to DCC’s arguments in the cases discussed above. However, JPH is really going for it. A ruling that the interstate sale of legal marijuana must be authorized by the DCC would be extraordinary.

What happened to the first case of JPH in 2022?

The first JPH case was filed in late 2022 fired in early 2024. He was dismissed by JPH voluntarily and essentially for political reasons. I have a little more information, but I have to say less. Suffice it to say for now that JPH can file again, and I don’t anticipate any problems for procedural or standing reasons.

What happens if JPH wins?

This is a very interesting question, and I have not considered it fully. Oregon, of course, would have had the right to appeal, and probably would have; and it’s entirely possible that the Ninth Circuit will take over the case. The final stop will be the US Supreme Court, although a very small percentage of federal cases make it there.

If Oregon’s laws banning the interstate sale of cannabis are repealed, some important questions include:

  • Which state or states will also change their laws, voluntarily or otherwise, and accept cannabis from Oregon operators?
  • What impact will interstate sales have on the Oregon market? (Presumably, Oregon would also have to accept marijuana from other states.)
  • What upward pressure, if any, will the administration put on Congress to finally act?

Who is behind the JPH case?

As mentioned above, JPH is a licensed cannabis wholesaler in Oregon. The company’s lawyer is a talented judge, Andrew DeWeese. Andrei is a friend of the law firm and my former neighbor down the road. Many thanks to Andrew for sharing an advance copy of this well-written complaint with me last week. And good luck.

Source: Legal Canna Blog

Continue Reading

Featured

Conversations in Cannabis: Tiffany Chin, CEO of Death Row Cannabis

Published

on

By

Conversations in Cannabis: Tiffany Chin, CEO of Death Row Cannabis

*Audio has been fixed!*

Few figures in the cannabis space embody both cultural heritage and modern innovation Tiffany rank. As the CEO Cannabis deathChin stands at the intersection of heritage and evolution-one of the most iconic, guided by the famous brands in California, in a new era. With a background that combines a deep industry experience with a growing plants with her husband with a sharp understanding of the brand’s authenticity, she helps convert the deadly line from legendary recording ecosystem of lifestyle, rooted in cannabis, culture and creativity.

Under the guidance of the rank, Death Row Cannabis became not just a vehicle for the approval of celebrities – it is a platform that respects the West Coast’s heritage, setting new standards on quality, transparency and representation. It moved through the brands through the problems of normative shifts, fierce competition and public control, honoring the heritage of the death records and its powerful connection with the history of hip-hop.

But the role of the rank goes beyond the brand management. It plays an important role in demonstrating how authenticity provides success in the cannabis sector – especially when celebrities are involved. Instead of relying solely on the name, it focuses on the development of long -term stability and the development of real relationships with consumers who care about what in their product as much as it is.

I am proud to have the opportunity to talk to Tiffany to discuss the state of the industry and how celebrities play a role. This interview has been recorded further April 8, 2025.

We would like to thank Tiffany for her time in today’s episode. For more information about Death Row Cannabis, don’t forget to visit them online at the Internet www.deathrowcannabis.co. This will do this for us today, thank you again for listening and, as always, make sure you keep track of the next episode on the conversations in the cannabis

Message Talks in Cannabis: Tiffany Chin, CEO of Death Row Cannabis appeared first further Retail Marijuana Retail Report – News and Information for Cannabis sellers.

(Tagstotranslate) submitted

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media