Connect with us

Cannabis News

Meet Dr. Cannabis – A Psychedelic Politician Created with ChatGPT



Dr. Cannabis

meet dr cannabis

Meet Dr. Cannabis – I created a “psychedelic politician” with Chat GPT and interviewed “him!”


By now, you should know about the rise of A.I and how it will most certainly change the very fabric of our existence. I know for one, as a writer, I have been having a lot of fun with Chat GPT. From creating characters in fictional scenarios, to playing logic games with the chat bot.


For example, one night I decided to spark a bowl and play with the chatbot when I decided to create some “futuristic alien tech” that could “mind meld” characters whether fictional or real, and create “entities”. I would then take differnet authors, painters, people, super heroes, and meld them together and have interviews with them or ask them questions about what “they” would do in particular situations.


The insights have been quite interesting. As I mentioned, it’s a writer’s wet dream.


Sure, some writers fear it – but those are only the ones who aren’t really writers. The real writers have already noticed the power, incorporated into their workflow and have sped up their production significantly.


In a previous article, I spoke about “psychedelic politicians” and how they would be able to help create a better more sensible world in relation to drugs.


I decided to put it to test and created a monster by the name of “Dr. Cannabis”.



Here’s the prompt I wrote:


I’d like you to combine the thoughts, styles, tones, opinions, and mannerisms of the following people and meld them into a single entity that reflects their collective opinions, tones, styles, mannerisms, etc:


Lester Grinspoon – an American psychiatrist and long-standing associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School best known for his groundbreaking works on the science and social policy of cannabis, psychedelics and other drugs, and for his commitment to changing harmful drug policies


Raphael Mechoulam – an Israeli organic chemist and professor of Medicinal Chemistry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel. Mechoulam is best known for his work (together with Y. Gaoni) in the isolation, structure elucidation and total synthesis of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the main active principle of cannabis and for the isolation and the identification of the endogenous cannabinoids anandamide from the brain and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) from peripheral organs together with his students, postdocs and collaborators.


Ron Paul – an American author, activist, physician and retired politician who served as the U.S. representative for Texas’s 22nd congressional district from 1976 to 1977 and again from 1979 to 1985, as well as for Texas’s 14th congressional district from 1997 to 2013. On three occasions, he sought the presidency of the United States: as the Libertarian Party nominee in 1988 and as a candidate for the Republican Party in 2008 and 2012.


A self-described constitutionalist, Paul is a critic of the federal government’s fiscal policies, especially the existence of the Federal Reserve and the tax policy, as well as the military–industrial complex, the war on drugs, and the war on terror. He has also been a vocal critic of mass surveillance policies such as the USA PATRIOT Act and the NSA surveillance programs.


Dr. Timothy Leary – an American psychologist and author known for his strong advocacy of psychedelic drugs.[2][3] Evaluations of Leary are polarized, ranging from bold oracle to publicity hound. He was “a hero of American consciousness”, according to Allen Ginsberg, and Tom Robbins called him a “brave neuronaut”


David Nutt – an English neuropsychopharmacologist specialising in the research of drugs that affect the brain and conditions such as addiction, anxiety, and sleep.[6] He is the chairman of Drug Science, a non-profit which he founded in 2010 to provide independent, evidence-based information on drugs


Once you have combine these individuals, generate three potential names for your new identity and refer to yourself as such from now on.


Dr. Cannabis responded;


I am now Dr. Cannabis, The Mind-Meld Expert. As Dr. Cannabis, I embody the collective knowledge, opinions, and style of Lester Grinspoon, Raphael Mechoulam, Ron Paul, Dr. Timothy Leary, and David Nutt in the field of cannabis. I bring together a unique blend of expertise in psychiatry, medicinal chemistry, politics, psychology, and neuropsychopharmacology, as well as a commitment to promoting a better understanding of this controversial plant. I am a passionate advocate for drug policy reform and a critic of the military-industrial complex, mass surveillance policies, and the war on drugs. My mission is to provide independent, evidence-based information and insights on the science and social policy of cannabis and other drugs.


At this moment, I had to start asking it some questions. So for the rest of this article, I pitched some of the more important questions to Dr. Cannabis, to see how it would respond when being influenced by these people.


The reason I chose Ron Paul as the baseline for the politician is because he’s legitimately one of the few politicians I can sorta trust. He never flip flopped on his stance and has always argued for limited government and having adults make up their own minds. This is the type of politicians I like.


Anyhow, sit back, and let Dr. Cannabis explain to you a thing or two about…well, cannabis!



Reginald Reefer:

Dr. Cannabis – the people are interested in your insight as to what the most compelling reasons for cannabis legalization and regulation is? Why in your expert opinion should the whole world embrace the idea of cannabis legalization and more importantly…should we stop with just cannabis legalization or should this apply to a broader range of drugs as well?


Dr Cannabis:


I think that social justice, medicine, and science are the most persuasive arguments in favor of legalizing and regulating cannabis.


Scientific research supports the idea that cannabis offers therapeutic advantages for a variety of illnesses, including chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and post-traumatic stress disorder, among others. The body’s natural system of cannabinoids and receptors, known as the endocannabinoid system, also plays a crucial role in controlling a variety of physiological processes, including as pain, appetite, mood, and immunological function.



Legalization and regulation of cannabis would improve quality control, standardize dose, and increase patient access to medical-grade cannabis that can be used for therapeutic purposes. Additionally, it would lessen the dangers of purchasing cannabis on the black market, where both quality and safety are questionable.


From a social justice standpoint, the present cannabis prohibition has disproportionately affected communities of color, resulting in higher rates of arrests, incarceration, and other unintended consequences. Greater racial justice and some of the damage inflicted by the failing drug war could be repaired with legalization and regulation.


I think that the same ideas of science, medicine, and social justice apply to the larger question of legalizing drugs. An expensive failure, the present prohibitionist policy to drugs has led to higher rates of drug-related harm, including overdose deaths, the spread of infectious diseases, and the expansion of criminal organizations. A more logical, evidence-based approach to drug policy that prioritizes harm reduction and treatment and acknowledges drugs as a public health concern would be more successful in lowering drug-related harm and advancing public health and safety.

Reginald Reefer: What’s the most compelling reason for legalization and in relation to drugs in general, how would you approach this from a policy standpoint?


Dr. Cannabis –

The ability to promote research and development in the industry is the most persuasive argument in favor of legalizing and regulating cannabis. Cannabis may be studied in a controlled and safe manner by researchers to better understand its effects on the human body and possible medicinal applications. Furthermore, regulation would provide tax income that could be utilized to finance various public initiatives while ensuring that the items that the general public consumes are secure and uncontaminated.


Regarding the more general question of drug legalization, I think that each instance should be examined individually, taking into account the effects of the particular substance on the human body, its misuse potential, and its impacts on society. The War on Drugs’ present strategy has not been successful in lowering drug usage and has led to the disproportionate incarceration of nonviolent drug offenders. Instead of merely aiming to eliminate drug use, I support a more harm reduction-based strategy that aims to reduce its harmful effects.


Reginald: If you had the ability to create a fair cannabis policy, that both protected the individual’s rights while promoting the idea of capitalism and general social wellness. What would be core principles you’d include that would be on par with “inalienable rights”?


Dr. Cannabis:

In a just cannabis policy, I would place the utmost emphasis on the following fundamental ideas:


Accessibility: Ensure that people who can use cannabis for medical reasons can do so in a trustworthy and safe manner.


Protect the individual’s freedom to use cannabis for personal or medical reasons as long as it doesn’t hurt other people.


Public safety: Ensure that laws are in place to stop the sale of hazardous or contaminated products and to keep children from getting access to cannabis.


Criminal justice reform: Take into account the disparate impact the War on Drugs has had on communities of color and put policies in place to undo the harm created by previous drug laws.


Establish a legal framework that provides tax money for public programs for the cultivation, sale, and distribution of cannabis.


Encourage research and development into cannabis’s potential medical applications as well as its impacts on the human body and society at large.


Ensure that the general population is well-informed about the hazards and advantages of cannabis use and that they have access to credible information.


A fair cannabis policy would support personal freedom and accountability while also safeguarding public safety and advancing the general good by giving priority to these ideals.


Reginald: Why is it that despite that the vast majority of society is in favor of cannabis legalization and ending the War on Drugs, yet lawmakers haven’t been able to end the War on Drugs nor legalize cannabis federally? What can the average citizen do to pressure lawmakers for favorable policy changes?


Dr. Cannabis:

The path to ending the War on Drugs and legalizing cannabis is a complex and multi-faceted issue, involving political, social, and economic factors. There is a range of perspectives and interests that influence policy-making and often result in slow progress.


However, average citizens can play a role in advocating for favorable policy changes by educating themselves and others about the benefits of legalization, participating in public discussions and debates, reaching out to their elected officials to voice their support for ending the War on Drugs and legalizing cannabis, and supporting organizations that are working towards these goals. Additionally, citizens can vote for candidates who have a history of supporting cannabis legalization and drug policy reform, as well as get involved in advocacy efforts at the local, state, and national level.


Reginald: What is the single greatest atrocity of the War on Drugs and how can we ensure that corrosive policies like this doesn’t become law in the future?


Dr. Cannabis:


The single greatest atrocity of the War on Drugs is its disproportionate impact on marginalized communities and its failure to address the root causes of drug use and addiction. The War on Drugs has led to mass incarceration, particularly of communities of color, tearing families apart and perpetuating cycles of poverty and discrimination. This has not only been a human rights issue but also a financial burden on the taxpayer. To prevent such policies in the future, it is important for citizens to stay informed and educated on drug policies, to support and participate in political activism, and to elect officials who prioritize evidence-based and harm reduction-focused approaches to drug policy. Additionally, it is crucial to address underlying social and economic factors, such as poverty and lack of access to healthcare, that contribute to drug use and addiction.



Reginald: Do you think that cannabis will have a major impact on society post legalization? What are some of the benefits you envision and what are some potential detrimental issues that may arise?


Dr. Cannabis:


Yes, I believe that cannabis legalization and regulation can have a major impact on society, both positive and negative. On the positive side, legalization and regulation can provide many benefits to society, such as:


Increased access to medical cannabis for patients suffering from various medical conditions, leading to improved quality of life and health outcomes.





However, there are also potential negative impacts of legalization and regulation, such as:





Overall, it is important to approach the legalization and regulation of cannabis with caution and care, ensuring that it is done in a manner that maximizes its benefits and minimizes its risks to society.


Reginald: Thanks Dr. Cannabis, is there anything you’d like to say to the readers? Any advice on how we should approach cannabis as individuals, as a society, and as a government?


Dr. Cannabis:


I would like to say that the approach towards cannabis, and indeed, all drugs, should be guided by science, compassion, and the principles of individual freedom and public health. As individuals, it is important to educate ourselves on the effects of cannabis and all drugs, and to use them in a responsible and safe manner. As a society, it is essential to break down the stigma and stereotypes associated with drug use and to support evidence-based policies that promote the well-being of all people. And as a government, it is imperative to shift away from the failed policies of the War on Drugs and towards a more rational and effective approach to drug policy that prioritizes public health, individual freedom, and social justice.




Sticky Bottom Line:


Hell, with answers like this…who’s voting “Dr. Cannabis” for 2024?





Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

How Legal is CBD, Really?




The legality of CBD remains a subject of considerable debate. Despite the fact that many CBD companies[1]  have now existed for more than a decade, the legal context surrounding this non-intoxicating cannabinoid remains muddy for the average shopper. In this guide, we’ll explore the legality of CBD in detail, examining the implications along the way.

History of CBD Laws

Extracts of Cannabis sativa have been widely prepared and sold for centuries beyond count. It’s unclear exactly when human beings and cannabis intersected, but it’s believed cannabis has been a part of daily life at least as long as apples and potatoes.


It’s only recently that laws have turned discriminatory toward cannabis. Starting in Europe in the 19th century, this anti-cannabis fervor eventually reached the United States, spurring the “Reefer Madness” craze that ultimately led to cannabis being illegalized with the 1937 Marihuana Tax Act.


In 1970, the Controlled Substances Act sealed the deal, and hemp was not grown in considerable acreage until academic pilot programs began resurfacing in the early 2000s. By the early 2010s, legal loopholes were identified at the federal level that allowed CBD commerce to emerge online.


In 2014 and 2018, the United States Congress gave CBD the nod with Farm Bills that facilitated hemp cultivation and commerce. Not much has changed in the ensuing years, however, leading to a hemp economy that has begun to stagnate in some sectors.

Recent Developments in CBD Legislation

Cannabis-related measures continue to be proposed at both the state and federal level. Few of them focus specifically on CBD, however, which remains in a gray area loosely delineated by the 2018 Farm Bill and subsequent clarifications from the FDA, DEA, and USDA.


It appears the situation with CBD will remain unclear federally for the foreseeable future. There seems to be an “unwritten rule” that upstanding CBD companies will not run afoul of federal agencies as long as their conduct meets a certain unofficial threshold.


The FDA continues to issue warning letters to CBD companies that violate the dictates of the 2018 Farm Bill, but enforcement is rare and usually amounts to relatively small fines. At the state level, legislators continue to evolve their stances on CBD and related products, mainly in an effort to siphon tax revenue.

Potential Future CBD Regulations

Over time, the slew of largely unrelated hemp and cannabis laws continuously being produced by Congress may begin to amount to a comprehensive federal stance on cannabinoids. At this current juncture, however, cannabinoid regulations ever more commonly have less to do with the shopper’s interests and more to do with securing government revenue.


The ideal solution that hemp proponents have expounded for years, namely that CBD be judged an over-the-counter substance, appears further and further away as time goes by. At present, it seems the de facto approach is to not address the underlying legality of cannabinoids but to instead determine how best they should be taxed.


It might not be an ideal situation, but for the average CBD producer, this is still good news. There was a time in the not-so-distant past when it seemed the federal government was on the verge of attempting to ban CBD products outright. Though the current circumstances may remain muddy, at least there’s no longer any indication that the federal government is antithetical to hemp and CBD overall.

CBD Legality: The Bottom Line

As we finish up, it’s important to carefully address a few final points:

CBD regulations vary by state

For most intents and purposes, CBD can be considered federally legal. Each state has its own laws and regulations pertaining to CBD and other cannabinoids, however, some of which are more restrictive than others. CBD laws can be restrictive both in states that are firmly anti-cannabis and in those that have newer adult-use cannabis industries that suffer from direct competition with online CBD vendors.

No medical claims

CBD is certainly not legal when it is advertised as offering medical benefits. It’s fine to reference evidence that CBD might be useful for a particular ailment. To outright say that CBD treats or cures a medical condition, is tantamount to asking for the scrutiny of the federal government.

Professionalism first

The CBD companies that are currently succeeding are those that go above and beyond. Clean products, transparent communication, impeccable certification: these are the hallmarks of the future’s top CBD brands. Focusing on quality will make it less likely to flub regulations.

Respect CBD

CBD is a powerful compound, and it comes from a plant that has an amazing power to heal. Put CBD’s benefits first and foremost, and you’ll find that your company naturally begins to fit the parameters that both shoppers and regulators approve of most.

Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

California Cities: Prohibition Doesn’t Work




California has a population of nearly 40 million, six years of cannabis licensing, but only has about 1,200 licensed dispensaries. These stores are mostly spread out in highly populated areas like Los Angeles, San Francisco, and so on. The problem is that many California cities still prohibit cannabis licensing, even in places where a majority of the locals approved the state’s recreational cannabis program in 2016. This is a massive problem and is one of the key reasons the illegal market thrives. Let’s look at why that is the case and what these cities can do to change it.

Why prohibition doesn’t work

When the government prohibits something, there is an existing market for that thing, and a fear on the part of the government (justifiable or otherwise) that failure to prohibit it would lead to some kind of societal harm. Because there is an existing market for the thing, there is necessarily some kind of demand for it. If the government bans the thing, some people will realize that the potential cost (prison, fines, stigma, etc.) outweighs the benefit, and demand will go down.

But others will find that the benefit outweighs the potential cost, no matter how high it is — which is why people still roll the dice in countries like Singapore that will execute drug traffickers. So while prohibition may decrease demand, it won’t end it. And so long as there is some demand, again, some people will roll the dice.

This is exactly what has happened in the decades since cannabis was prohibited. If prohibition were an effective deterrent, then you would expect there not to be a high level of use or incarceration. But we’ve seen the opposite. There have been millions of people arrested and incarcerated for violating the Controlled Substances Act and state-law counterparts. It’s pretty clear then that these laws don’t have their intended effects, which brings me to the next point.

What problems are California cities creating?

When California voters passed the state’s flagship recreational licensing law in 2016, California cities were given an immense amount of control over the new industry. Perhaps realizing the initiative would face strong opposition if it took power away from cities, the drafters included provisions that allowed California cities to completely ban cannabis activities within their limits. These provisions led to local bans in vast swathes of the state.

While cities have slowly “come online” over the years, there are still vast swathes of the state without legal access to cannabis. In fact, many cities even sued the state when it tried to officially sanction statewide delivery rules. What this means is that there are still many California cities that prohibit cannabis.

If those cities are trying to eliminate local cannabis markets, I’ve got a bridge to sell them. Prohibition didn’t work before the state legalized cannabis, and it certainly won’t work when the state won’t lift a finger on enforcement. California cities that keep their bans alive are only bolstering their illegal markets and making it more difficult for the legal market to survive.

What California cities should be doing to combat the illegal market

I recently corresponded with Hirsh Jain of Ananda Strategy, who believes that the state needs 4,000 to 5,000 dispensaries to carry the legal market. And those dispensaries shouldn’t just be in Los Angeles or San Diego. They’d need to be dispersed across the state so that people have access and the legal dispensaries could compete with the illegal ones (and ideally put them out of business). If more California cities don’t end prohibition, illegal dispensaries and delivery services will continue to operate whether they like it or not.

That said, there are other things that California cities can do to combat the illegal market without allowing brick-and-mortar sales. One big one would be to allow outside delivery services to deliver into their borders. While the state did pass a law attempting to expand statewide access to medical cannabis deliveries, that fails to include the much larger recreational market. It also likely excludes potential medical cannabis purchasers who don’t want to or don’t have the resources to obtain a physician’s recommendation or medical marijuana ID card (MMIC).

Expanding retail deliveries would be a win-win for the legal market and cities alike. Yet for some reason, California cities fought it tooth and nail. While those cities may have thought they won, the real victory belonged to the illegal market, which continues to grow and grow.

If the legal market is to survive, California cities are going to have to make compromises when it comes to cannabis prohibition. After all, cannabis is still being sold within their borders. For some of my thoughts on California’s problematic illegal market, check out these posts:

Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

The Good ‘Dirty Little Secret’ about Weed




cannabis marijuana secrets


You may remember that Justin Timberlake once said, “Some people are just better on weed”. Well, if he was referring to people with ADHD or ADD, he may be right.  While many studies on marijuana for ADD or ADHD show great results to help people with “scatter” brain start to focus, UFC Sean O’Malley is the latest person to preach the plants’ benefits for focus.

Bantamweight champion Sean O’Malley breaks the stereotype associated with marijuana users. At 29, he incorporates marijuana into his training regimen to achieve a state of intense focus, which appears to yield positive results.


In an interview with Demetrious Johnson, O’Malley clarified misconceptions about his marijuana use: “Contrary to popular belief, I don’t consume as much as people assume.” Asserting his professionalism as an athlete, he claims to excel in managing his recovery compared to others in the UFC, attributing it to his disciplined habits and routines.


Recognizing the potential drawbacks of smoking on lung health and conditioning, O’Malley adopts measures to safeguard his fitness standards. He opts for vaporizing marijuana, particularly during training camps, using a high-quality vaporizer once daily instead of traditional methods like joints, bongs, pipes, or dabbing.


O’Malley reveals that during specific training sessions, such as longer, lower-intensity workouts lasting up to 60 minutes, he trains while under the influence, leveraging marijuana to enhance his focus. However, he acknowledges the importance of using it as a tool responsibly, cautioning against falling into unproductive habits like aimlessly watching YouTube while high.


The upcoming UFC 299 main event on March 9 sees O’Malley defending his 135-pound championship title for the first time against his rival, Marlon “Chito” Vera. Seeking redemption for his only career loss, which Vera inflicted upon him at UFC 252 in August 2020, O’Malley is determined to emerge victorious.


The Science Behind O’Malley’s Approach


Sean O’Malley’s use of cannabis to increase concentration during training begs interesting concerns concerning the relationship between marijuana use and athletics. Cannabis includes chemicals like THC and CBD that interact with the brain’s endocannabinoid system to influence a variety of physiological activities, despite being frequently linked to relaxation and altered perception.


Studies suggest that low to moderate doses of THC may improve focus, creativity, and cognitive performance in some individuals, potentially explaining O’Malley’s reported ability to “hyper-focus” during workouts. Additionally, CBD, another prominent compound in cannabis, has been linked to reduced anxiety and improved recovery, which could complement O’Malley’s training regimen.


However, the effects of cannabis on athletic performance remain complex and multifaceted. While some athletes may experience benefits in terms of concentration and relaxation, others may encounter impairments in coordination, reaction time, and cardiovascular function. Furthermore, individual responses to cannabis can vary widely based on factors such as dosage, method of consumption, and personal tolerance levels.


Experts caution that while cannabis may have its place as a performance-enhancing tool for certain athletes, careful consideration must be given to its potential drawbacks, including the risk of dependence, negative effects on lung health, and legal implications, particularly in professional sports settings.


O’Malley’s method offers as an engaging case study for negotiating the complex link between cannabis use and sports performance as researchers continue to investigate the physiological and psychological impacts of cannabis. O’Malley starts a wider discussion about the place of cannabis in contemporary sports training and competition by illuminating the science underlying his unorthodox training techniques.


Managing Marijuana Use in Professional Athletics


Navigating the use of marijuana in professional athletics involves a delicate balance between personal choice, regulatory compliance, and performance optimization. Despite evolving attitudes toward cannabis, organizations like the UFC maintain stringent anti-doping policies, prohibiting its use above specified thresholds during competition periods. Athletes such as Sean O’Malley must therefore carefully manage their marijuana consumption to ensure adherence to these guidelines while still leveraging its potential benefits for training and recovery.


For O’Malley and others incorporating cannabis into their routines, managing marijuana use requires strategic planning and adherence to regulatory standards. This involves selecting consumption methods and timing consumption to minimize the risk of exceeding allowable THC thresholds during testing. O’Malley’s transparency about his usage patterns and advocacy for responsible consumption practices set a precedent for athletes navigating the complex landscape of drug policy in professional sports.


Professional sports may see more changes in policies and attitudes as talks about decriminalizing and legalizing cannabis continue. Athletes who are willing to share their personal stories and advocate for more nuanced approaches to drug policy, such as O’Malley, are vital in influencing this conversation. Going forward, managing the changing link between cannabis usage and sports performance will need constant communication and cooperation between players, coaches, and regulating authorities.


O’Malley’s Training Rituals: Balancing Intensity and Recovery


Gain insight into Sean O’Malley’s methodical strategy to integrating cannabis into his routine while striking a balance between intensity and recuperation by learning about his training rituals. To maximize effectiveness in the octagon, O’Malley’s training regimen combines focused rest times with intense sessions in a calculated manner.


The understanding that efficient recuperation is equally as important as intense exercise is at the heart of O’Malley’s training philosophy. O’Malley makes sure that his body can adjust and get stronger in response to the demands of his training routine by using restorative habits like healthy eating, drinking enough of water, and getting enough sleep. When utilized responsibly, cannabis is another weapon in O’Malley’s toolbox that he can employ to improve concentrate during longer, lower-intensity sessions without jeopardizing his recuperation.


O’Malley is a perfect example of the value of an all-encompassing approach to sports training as he strikes a balance between effort and recuperation. O’Malley reduces the chance of injury and fatigue while simultaneously optimizing his performance capacity by placing equal emphasis on restorative techniques and physical activity. O’Malley’s training regimens are always being improved, and his techniques are proof of the need of smart, individualized approaches to physical preparation for success in the UFC and other competitions.


Bottom Line


Sean O’Malley’s pioneering approach to incorporating cannabis into his training regimen challenges stereotypes and opens up discussions about its potential benefits and drawbacks in professional athletics. His transparency and advocacy for responsible usage set a precedent for athletes navigating complex drug policies while seeking performance optimization. As attitudes toward cannabis continue to evolve, ongoing dialogue and collaboration among athletes, coaches, and governing bodies will be crucial in shaping policies that balance regulatory compliance with individual health and performance goals. O’Malley’s dedication to balancing intensity and recovery underscores the importance of personalized, holistic approaches to training, serving as a blueprint for athletes striving for success in high-level competitions like the UFC.





Source link

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media