cannabis policy

Republican Congressman Plans to Reintroduce Bill to Reschedule Cannabis

Published

5 days ago

August 17, 2025

admin

Republican Congressman Plans to Reintroduce Bill to Reschedule Cannabis

Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) has shown plans to restore a 1-in-3 marijuana-3 mass-to move cannabis from the federal act of controlled substances (CSA) in Program III. In a post on X, Steube called the proposal “a change of common sense that will finally allow true scientific research in its medicinal value and ensure that our drug laws reflect reality.”

“It makes sense that federal law treats marijuana just like heroin and LSD. It is even more ridiculous that cocaine is technically classified as less restrictive than marijuana.” – Steube in a post on x

Steube first proposed legislation in 2023. According to Bill’s compilation, it would direct the drug implementation administration (DEA) to make the transfer. The move never made it from neither the Energy and Trade Committee nor the Judicial Committee.

Steube’s announcement comes days after reporting that President Donald Trump (R) told attendees about a private funding at his private club in Bedminster, New Jersey, that he is considering reconstruction of cannabis under CSA. During a press conference on Monday, Trump said the administration is “watching reclassification” and “would determine over the next few weeks”.

“Some people like it, some people hate it,” Trump said during the oppressor. “Some people hate the whole concept of marijuana because it does bad for children, it does bad for people who are older than children.”

A plan to renew cannabis under the CSA was first set up by President Joe Biden (d) last May, but stalled in January when DEA John Mulrooney Administrative Judge, who was chairing hearing, decided to allow the future Trump administration to decide whether to reunite the process. Mulrooney recently retired which leaves the issue only with the new Dea Terrance Cole administrator.

Steube’s bill has not yet been returned.

TG joined Ganjapreur in 2014 as a news writer and began waiting for Podcast Ganjapreurur in 2016. He is located at the Upsstate New York, where he also teaches media studies at a local university.
More by TG Branfalt

adult use

Ballot Initiative in Massachusetts Seeks to Repeal Adult-Use Cannabis Law

Published

5 days ago

August 17, 2025

admin

Ballot Initiative in Massachusetts Seeks to Repeal Adult-Use Cannabis Law

A voting initiative proposed in Massachusetts seeks to abolish cannabis law on the use of state adults approved by voters in 2016. Proposal by Caroline Cunningham comes in the form of two proposed laws, both entitled “An act to restore a sensitive marijuana policy”, and will finish the cannabis sales “and will end.” right from adults to cultivate cannabis at home.

Proposals are signed by 14 other voters of Massachusetts. Both laws will decriminalize the possession of more than one Once, but less than two ounces, and a violation of the law would be a civil offense with a $ 100 fine. Adults would still be able to donate cannabis to each other.

Medical cannabis will also remain legal under proposals but ”Version a“It would remove the flower with a concentration of thc higher than 30%, focuses on the power greater than 60%, and Edibles with more than 5 milligrams of thc for service.”Version b“Will the Cannabis Control Commission and the State Health Department obtain” ensuring that the production and distribution of medical use is effectively regulated “but does not describe the limits of Prodyct power.

To obtain a vote issue in Massachusetts, the Office of the Prosecutor General must first review whether the petitions meet some constitutional requirements to appear with the Secretary of Commonwealth, who will notify whether it has been approved for certification on September 3. If the registered initiative to register, registered initiatives, registrars, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered, registered. Commonwealth by December 3. Once the signatures are verified, the proposal is sent to the state legislature in January for its approval. If lawmakers do not approve the proposal, supporters then must collect an additional signatures from the voters registered until July 1, 2026, to establish the November 2026 voting initiative.

adult use

Federal Appeals Court Rules Some Provisions of New York’s Social Equity Rules are Unconstitutional

Published

5 days ago

August 17, 2025

admin

Federal Appeals Court Rules Some Provisions of New York’s Social Equity Rules are Unconstitutional

A Federal Court of Appeal in New York on Tuesday sanitted That some of the state’s social capital rules for cannabis licenses are likely to be unconstitutional. In Decision 2-1-1, judges in the Court of Appeal for the Second District in Manhattan said that rules, which exclude people with federal or abroad cannabis from taking precedence, seem to violate constitutional principles that prohibit states to favor their inhabitants over those from other states.

“According to the principles of the traditional dormant trade clause, the priority of the priority of New York applicants convincingly under New York’s law is a protectionist measure that cannot stand.” – Dennis Jacobs District Judge, Variscite NY Four, LLC, Variscite NY Five, LLC against New York State Cannabis Control Board, New York State Office for Cannabis Management, Tremaine Wright, Felicia Reid, FKA Christopher Alexander, 8/12/25

The matter was brought by two abroad applicants who were denied the status of priority. The decision will have no immediate effect on licensing or existing businesses in New York or other countries. The case returned to the trial court for further proceedings.

While the majority emphasized that “Congress has granted New York any clear permission to enforce the laws of protectionist marijuana licensing”, Court President Debra Ann Livingston, in its opposition, claimed that the majority mistakenly in determining the role that Congress should have in the policy of the state of cannabis while cannabis.

“Congress has the power to regulate some purely intrastate activities, this power is derived from its authority”

The ruling marks the first time that a federal district court has applied the doctrine of the dormant trade clause in the cannabis markets with adult use.