Connect with us

Cannabis News

Rhode Island Officials Support Ban On Serving Hemp THC Drinks In Bars And Restaurants With Liquor Licenses

Published

on

“All retailers selling intoxicating hemp products must be held to the same high safety standards as cannabis sellers.”

By Christopher Shea, Rhode Island Currant

For a year, bars and restaurants in Rhode Island were able to obtain a license from the state’s former Office of Cannabis Regulation to sell THC-infused alcoholic beverages, despite state regulations that prohibit combining them with alcohol, tobacco or nicotine.

More than 100 licensed retailers obtained their licenses between August 2024 and July 2025, when the Cannabis Control Commission suspended issuing a new license to establishments that allow alcohol consumption on the premises “in the interest of public health and safety”.

Now, as regulators race to codify rules to match the market, the association representing the state’s hospitality industry is voicing strong opposition to a commission recommendation by lawmakers to codify a ban on selling THC beverages at liquor-licensed premises.

“They’re assuming we’re not going to follow the law,” Farouk Rajab, president and CEO of the Rhode Island Hospitality Association, said in an interview Monday.

Rajab said he was disappointed that the commission recommends a ban in its latest report presented to the General Assembly on March 1. But he wasn’t surprised that cuts had yet to be made.

“I think decisions are made even before the listening sessions,” he said. “This is aimed at an industry, that’s all.”

11 page report details Rules governing hemp-derived beverages in Rhode Islandalong with recommendations on product labelling, testing and taxation.

Carla Aveledo, head of policy for the committee, said that no single industry was targeted.

“All retailers selling intoxicating hemp products must be held to the same high safety standards as those selling cannabis,” he said.

Hemp became legal at the federal level after the passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, when the beverage hit the Rhode Island market as regulators were working on licensing rules for retail cannabis establishments. The rules allowing the sale of the beverage were adopted by the former Office of Cannabis Regulation in 2024, and the rules have since been adopted by the state Office of Cannabis.

But the proliferation of hemp-derived THC drinks has led to debate over whether they should be legal at all in Rhode Island. Members of the state’s recreational cannabis industry have opposed the possibility of selling THC products outside of the few existing pot shops.

That’s why last year the General Assembly tasked the Cannabis Control Commission with making recommendations to combat hemp-derived beverages, most of which are produced outside the state.

Rajab said the association had created “training modules that enable safe handling” of the drinks. The online course explains how receptors in the brain react to cannabis, onset times, and how to avoid THC overdose.

The association’s module also mandates catering staff to never serve THC beverages with alcohol.

“Mixing THC-infused drinks with alcohol can lead to unpredictable and dangerous situations,” he says. “As a server, it is your responsibility to discourage customers from consuming THC beverages alongside alcoholic beverages. Educate them about the risks and encourage safer consumption practices to ensure their well-being.”

Drinks are often sold in four-can packs at liquor stores. State regulations limit 1 milligram of THC per drink and no more than 5 milligrams of THC “per pack.”

Rajab said instead of banning restaurants from selling drinks, the state should codify rules to guide the hospitality industry. He pointed to Minnesota, which has allowed liquor stores, grocery stores and bars to sell liquor since 2023.

“It’s safe to serve there,” he said.

of the committee the report it also highlights how “low-potency edible hemp” is regulated in the 10,000 Lakes lands. In order for a Minnesota bar to serve hemp-derived products, it must obtain an on-site consumption endorsement, which is selected when filling out the license application.

But even Minnesota regulators admit there is a big question mark over whether they will continue to sell the drinks when federal restrictions governing the potency of hemp take effect in November.

“This threw the whole industry out of business across the nation,” Jim Walker, a spokesman for the Minnesota Office of Cannabis Management, told the Rhode Island Current. “If we get to November and there’s no safety net, we as an office would help eliminate a lot of these businesses.”

Congress is still considering legislation that would delay enforcement of the ban for two years allow the sale of THC-derived beverages.

Aveledo said the Rhode Island Cannabis Control Commission continues to monitor federal hemp policy and acknowledged that it could affect regulators’ plans to update the state’s hemp regulations.

“The commission intends to make updates to the hemp regulations in 2026,” he said. “However, recent federal activity and future actions are uncertain, which may delay regulatory writing until early 2027 to ensure our framework is fully informed and strategically aligned.”

This story was first published by the Rhode Island Currant.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Maximizing cannabis yields with intercanopy and subcanopy lighting

Published

on

By







Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Transportation Groups Warn Feds Of Marijuana Rescheduling’s ‘Consequences’ For Drug Testing Of Truck Drivers And Pilots

Published

on

By

A coalition of transportation and safety organizations said they have “serious safety concerns” about the Trump administration’s move to federally regulate marijuana.

Led by the American Trucking Association, the groups sent a letter to federal officials Monday asking them to take steps to ensure truck drivers, pilots, transit operators and other safety-sensitive workers continue to be tested for cannabis.

“If employers do not take the necessary steps to preserve the ability of security-sensitive transportation workers to test for marijuana, this change could have significant consequences for the safety of passengers and the entire transportation industry,” wrote Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, and Transportation Secretary J.

The organizations said they understand that federal officials are being “urgently” reorganized under an executive order from President Donald Trump, that they are “deeply concerned that the current process does not adequately take into account agencies responsible for transportation safety or protecting the traveling public” and that they want the agencies to “work together.” ongoing cannabis redistricting hearings and rulemaking process to address these concerns.

In May, the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued new guidelines saying just that Truck drivers, airline pilots and other safety-sensitive workers still cannot use medical marijuana without penalty despite the Trump administration’s move to reschedule.

“Marijuana use is incompatible with safety-sensitive functions,” the department said.

Medical review officers (MROs) who receive drug test results indicating cannabis use cannot rule them out as negative for illegal substance use, even if an employee claims it was a result of state-licensed medical marijuana.

“Currently, there is no way for an MRO to verify that a laboratory-confirmed marijuana drug test result is positive when an employee claims the positive was caused by a state-licensed marijuana product,” the DOT said, explaining that after the reprogramming, medical marijuana dispensed under state law “does not” constitute a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The transportation groups said in the new letter that the DOT’s drug-testing program “is in accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs and HHS-certified laboratories.”

“While DOT has expressed its intention to continue testing marijuana, a commitment we greatly appreciate, it is unclear whether DOT will retain its ability to rely on HHS procedures and certifications after the rescheduling,” they wrote. “Without this alignment, DOT may retain the authority to conduct testing, but lack the scientific and procedural infrastructure to do so.”

“Practically, this would mean that truck and bus drivers, pilots, flight attendants, air traffic controllers, air mechanics, railroad workers, dispatchers and signal workers, transit operators and pipeline workers could continue to perform high-risk safety roles without a reliable means of verifying that they are not actively using marijuana. It relies on controlled substance testing to identify end use and prevent potentially impaired individuals from fulfilling their safety-related obligations. While the planning could create legal or regulatory loopholes, the regulated employer-based drug testing agency warned that the final rules should not jeopardize marijuana testing for safety-sensitive transportation workers.”

“Regardless of the broader policy goals of the review, the federal government should not move forward to preserve transportation drug testing programs and mitigate the risks of increased and unchecked deterioration of our roads, railroads, public transportation systems, pipelines, airspace, and maritime corridors,” the letter says.

The organizations specifically ask federal officials to:

  • Support long-term marijuana testing for all safety-sensitive transportation workers;
  • Confirm the authority of DOT-regulated employers to perform such tests;
  • Ensure HHS laboratory certification and testing guidelines remain available and aligned with DOT’s safety mission; and
  • Establish a coordinated federal strategy to address the transportation security implications of rescheduling.

“The public and the workers who keep our transportation system running safely deserve a process that ensures these safeguards are firmly in place before any final action is taken,” he said. the letter he says

Earlier this month, the House Appropriations Committee approved a provision to allow federal officials to continue requiring government employees and security-sensitive employees, such as truck drivers and airline pilots must be drug tested for marijuana, “regardless of any future change in legal status or schedule.”

This was followed by a press conference organized by prohibitionist groups and a drug-testing industry association, where both Republican lawmakers joined the proclamation. “Cut” to marijuana rescheduling by asserting that safety-sensitive transportation workers can still be punished for testing positive for THC.

Legislators and abolitionist activists argued that moving marijuana to Schedule III would lead to a 1986 executive order signed by President Ronald Reagan defining illegal drugs under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in relation to the use of cannabis by truck drivers and other airline employees.

Last October, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy suggested that President Donald Trump was “putting pressure” on rescheduling cannabis.arguing that marijuana is “truly addictive” and that policy reform on the issue sends a “dangerous” message.

“At a time when the culture is encouraging and celebrating the use of marijuana, we’re not talking about risk,” Duffy said.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Experts say THC percentage is the wrong way to shop for cannabis

Published

on

By


Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media