Connect with us

Cannabis News

Scotland to Go the Way of Portugal and Calls for the Decriminalization of All Drugs

Published

on


scotland to decriminalize drugs

Last week, the Scottish government made a plea to decriminalize the possession of small quantities of drugs as an effort to address the alarming number of overdose deaths in the country, which ranks among the highest in Europe. In a policy proposal, the semi-autonomous government in Edinburgh, led by the Scottish National Party advocating for independence, stated that removing criminal penalties for drug possession would enable the implementation of safe and evidence-based harm reduction services.

 

During a press conference, Scottish drugs minister Elena Whitham, alongside drug policy reform advocates Helen Clark, the former Prime Minister of New Zealand, and Ruth Dreifuss, the former President of Switzerland, expressed their belief that the “war on drugs” had proven unsuccessful. Whitham emphasised that the current drug legislation not only fails to deter drug use, prevent associated harm, and ultimately save lives, but it also exacerbates the negative consequences experienced by individuals. Criminalisation contributes to fatalities and intensifies the harm caused by drug use.

 

Scotland’s Urgent Call for Drug Decriminalization Amidst Overwhelming Overdose Crisis

 

Scotland currently faces a devastating drug overdose crisis, with a death rate three times higher than the rest of the United Kingdom and the highest in Western Europe. Government data cited by the Associated Press revealed that in the previous year, Scotland, with a population of only 5.5 million, witnessed 1,330 fatal drug overdoses.

 

In response to this alarming situation, the Scottish government published a policy paper last Friday, expressing deep empathy for the families and communities affected by each drug-related death. They acknowledged the urgent need for comprehensive measures and emphasised their consistent stance on adopting a radical public health approach to combat the drug emergency.

 

Drawing inspiration from Portugal’s drug policy, where criminal penalties were replaced by health-oriented reforms in 2001, the Scottish government proposed a similar decriminalization strategy. They believe such a plan would eliminate the fear of seeking treatment and support, thereby reducing drug-related harm and ultimately improving lives.

 

Additionally, the government intends to advocate for the establishment of supervised drug consumption sites, which have proven to save lives and encourage individuals struggling with substance misuse to seek assistance. They also put forth the idea of introducing regulated drug supplies to ensure consistency and safety.

 

Scottish drugs minister Elena Whitham highlighted the urgency of implementing a radical shift in drug policy, expressing concern over the increasing prevalence of synthetic opioids and new street benzodiazepines. She emphasised that without adequate 21st-century drug laws, Scotland would be ill-prepared to face the potential consequences.

 

Whitham’s apprehension stemmed from the belief that the situation would only worsen unless significant changes were made. The Scottish government aims to confront the crisis head-on by adopting innovative drug policy approaches, ensuring their citizens’ well-being and preventing further harm.

 

UK Government Stands Firm Against Drug Decriminalization

 

However, conservatives in both Scotland and the national government of the United Kingdom opposed the proposal for drug decriminalization. In Scotland, the current policy allows individuals caught in possession of drugs to receive a police warning, but complete decriminalization would necessitate approval from the conservative government in London. Max Blain, spokesperson for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, stated that such approval would not be granted.

 

Blain asserted, “There are no intentions to modify our firm stance on drugs.” The U.K. Home Office echoed this sentiment in a statement following Scotland’s decriminalization plan, emphasising their commitment to preventing drug use through treatment and recovery support, as well as addressing the supply of illegal drugs as outlined in their 10-year drugs strategy. They firmly stated that there were no plans to decriminalize drugs due to the associated harms, including the risks posed by organised criminals who exploit and engage in violence to further their illicit businesses.

 

Russell Findlay, the justice spokesperson for the Scottish Conservative Party, criticised the decriminalization proposal, describing it as “madness” to address Scotland’s drug death crisis, the most severe in Europe, by effectively legalising class-A drugs such as heroin and crack. Findlay expressed concern that such a move would increase drug availability on the streets, ultimately jeopardising more lives.

 

Evaluating the Impact of Drug Decriminalization

 

The proposal to decriminalize drugs in Scotland has ignited a vigorous and polarising debate among experts, policymakers, and the general public. With passionate arguments on both sides, the potential implications of such a policy change are being closely examined and assessed.

 

Drug decriminalization supporters presented strong justifications for their position. They argue that eliminating criminal sanctions for drug possession would get rid of the stigma and obstacles that keep people from getting the care they need. According to supporters, decriminalization would lead to better access to support and treatment programs, reducing drug-related harm and advancing public health. Additionally, they contend that this change would free up law enforcement to concentrate on bringing down sophisticated drug trafficking operations and upending organised crime networks.

 

However, opponents raise valid concerns about the potential risks associated with drug decriminalization. They expressed apprehension that it could increase drug availability and usage, potentially exacerbating the existing drug crisis. Detractors worry that decriminalization might send a misleading message about drug use, normalising or even encouraging substance abuse. Additionally, they voice fears regarding public safety and the potential for an increase in drug-related offences such as theft or violence.

 

The ongoing discourse and examination of these potential consequences highlight the intricate nature of addressing the drug crisis. It emphasises the requirement for a thorough strategy that carefully balances public health issues, social issues, and the larger influence on society. As the discussion continues, it is essential to carefully weigh the potential advantages and disadvantages of drug decriminalization to choose the most sensible and successful course of action.

 

Bottom Line

 

The government’s plea for drug decriminalization in Scotland in an effort to tackle the devastating overdose crisis has ignited a heated debate. While proponents argue that decriminalization would promote public health and access to treatment, opponents express concerns about potential risks and the impact on public safety. The opposing views of the Scottish and UK conservative governments highlight the complexity of addressing the drug crisis. As the discussions continue, finding a balanced and effective solution that prioritises the well-being of individuals remains a crucial challenge.

 

SCOTLAND’S MOVE TO LEGALIZE, READ ON…

SCOTLAND CANNABIS WORKERS

SCOTLAND’S CANNABIS WORKS, WHAT WE NOW KNOW!



Source link

Cannabis News

Runners’ High or Get High to Run?

Published

on

By


running high on marijuana vs running sober

Running Sober vs. High on Marijuana: How Weed Affects Your Workout

 

As the cultural and legal landscape surrounding cannabis continues to shift, many fitness enthusiasts are exploring its potential role in exercise routines. A growing number of runners are experimenting with cannabis use before workouts, sparking debates about its impact on physical performance. Does it enhance the experience or hinder results? This article delves into the science behind running sober versus running high, examining how cannabis affects endurance, focus, and overall workout performance.

 

The Basics of Running Sober

 

Running sober has long been the standard approach for athletes and fitness enthusiasts. Without external substances, runners rely on their natural physical and mental capacities to perform. This approach offers several benefits:

 

 

When running sober, the mind remains clear, allowing athletes to concentrate fully on their pace, breathing, and surroundings. This mental clarity can be crucial for maintaining proper form and achieving peak performance.

 

 

Sober running promotes a strong connection between the mind and body. Runners can accurately gauge their exertion levels, recognize signs of fatigue, and adjust their intensity accordingly.

 

 

Without the influence of substances, sober runners experience consistent physical responses to training. This consistency makes it easier to track progress, set realistic goals, and develop effective workout plans.

 

 

The Basics of Running High

 

Running high involves consuming cannabis before a workout, typically through smoking, vaping, or ingesting edibles. Advocates claim that cannabis can enhance the running experience in various ways:

 

 

Cannabis is known for its analgesic properties, which can help reduce muscle soreness and joint pain. Some runners report that cannabis allows them to push through discomfort and extend their workouts.

 

 

Cannabis can create a sense of euphoria or relaxation, often referred to as a “runner’s high.” For some, this altered perception makes running feel more enjoyable and less monotonous.

 

 

Cannabis may enhance the brain’s ability to enter a state of flow, where the runner feels deeply immersed in the activity. This can lead to creative thinking and a stronger connection to the running experience.

 

 

The Science of Cannabis and Exercise

 

To understand the effects of cannabis on running, it’s essential to examine its active compounds and how they interact with the body.

 

 

Cannabis contains two primary compounds that affect physical and mental states which are:

  • THC (tetrahydrocannabinol): The psychoactive component responsible for the “high.” THC alters perception, mood, and coordination.

 

 

The ratio of THC to CBD in a cannabis product significantly influences its effects on a workout. Products high in THC may impair coordination, while CBD-dominant options can provide relief from pain and inflammation without causing a high.

 

 

The body’s endocannabinoid system plays a crucial role in regulating mood, pain, and inflammation. Cannabis interacts with this system, potentially enhancing its natural functions. For instance, the endocannabinoids released during exercise are thought to contribute to the “runner’s high.”

 

Benefits of Running High

 

Proponents of running high argue that cannabis offers unique benefits that can enhance the workout experience:

 

 

Cannabis’s analgesic properties make it an attractive option for runners dealing with chronic pain or soreness. By reducing discomfort, it allows athletes to train longer and recover faster.

 

 

For some, running high turns a mundane workout into an enjoyable experience. The euphoric effects of THC can make runners feel more motivated and engaged.

 

 

Cannabis’s calming effects can help reduce pre-run anxiety, particularly for individuals preparing for races or long-distance runs. This relaxation can improve performance by preventing tension and overexertion.

 

Should You Try Running High?

 

If you’re considering running high, it’s essential to approach it with caution. Start with a low dose of cannabis in a safe and familiar environment. Pay attention to how your body responds and avoid using cannabis before races or high-stakes training sessions.

 

Risks and Drawbacks of Running High

 

Despite its potential benefits, running high comes with significant risks that runners should consider:

 

 

THC can impair motor skills and reaction times, increasing the likelihood of injuries or accidents during a run. This is especially dangerous for outdoor runners navigating traffic or uneven terrain.

 

 

Cannabis may distort a runner’s perception of effort, leading them to overexert or underestimate their limits. This can result in fatigue, dehydration, or even injury.

 

 

Smoking or vaping cannabis before running can irritate the lungs and reduce oxygen intake, negatively affecting endurance and performance.

 

 

In regions where cannabis use is prohibited, running high may carry legal consequences. Additionally, athletes competing in regulated events risk disqualification if cannabis use violates anti-doping rules.

 

Comparing the Two (Running sober vs high)

 

Performance: Running sober often leads to more predictable performance, as cannabis can either enhance or hinder depending on tolerance and strain.

Safety: While weed may reduce pain, it can impair judgment, making it harder to gauge limits or react to sudden changes in the environment.

Mental State: Some runners find that cannabis helps them relax and overcome pre-run anxiety, while others feel it clouds their mental clarity.

 

Conclusion

The decision to run sober or high is deeply personal and depends on individual preferences, goals, and circumstances. Running sober offers consistency, clarity, and safety, making it ideal for competitive athletes and those focused on measurable progress. On the other hand, running high can enhance enjoyment, reduce pain, and provide a unique mental experience, making it appealing for recreational runners.

 

Ultimately, the key is to approach cannabis use thoughtfully and responsibly. Whether you choose to lace up your running shoes sober or high, prioritizing safety and listening to your body will help ensure a rewarding workout experience.

 

RUNNERS AND MARIJUANA, READ ON…

RUNNERS USING CANNABIS

HOW DOES A RUNNER’S HIGH REALLY WORK? CLICK HERE!

 



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Two Economic Forces That are Reshaping America

Published

on

By


cannabis ai forces

Two Sectors of Society that’s Not Going Away…

You know that feeling when you’re comfortably high and suddenly have an epiphany about how rapidly the world is changing? Well, that’s exactly what happened to me recently while scrolling through Reddit, watching two separate conversations unfold about AI and cannabis – perhaps the two most transformative forces reshaping our society today.

The pace of change is dizzying, isn’t it? We’re living in an era where technological advancement isn’t just rapid – it’s exponential. Before we can fully grasp one innovation, three more have already emerged. And while some folks are still debating whether to embrace these changes, the train has not only left the station, it’s broken the sound barrier.

I found myself in the middle of a heated debate about AI in publishing, with some traditionally-minded writers clutching their pearls at the mere mention of using artificial intelligence in the creative process. The irony wasn’t lost on me – here they were, arguing on a digital platform about the evils of digital progress. Meanwhile, in another corner of Reddit, I stumbled upon a discussion about cannabis stocks, with one astute observer noting, “Cannabis ain’t going anywhere…”

And you know what? Both these threads got me thinking. These two sectors – AI and cannabis – share something fascinating in common: they’re both unstoppable forces that are fundamentally altering how we live, think, and interact with the world. Whether you’re excited about it or terrified, both are here to stay. The only real question is how we choose to integrate them into our society.

So pack a bowl, fire up your neural networks (both biological and artificial), and join me as we explore these transformative forces reshaping our world. Trust me, this is going to be one hell of a trip through the intersection of technology, consciousness, and social change.

Let me tell you something about revolution – it doesn’t always come with a bang. Sometimes it creeps in slowly, one dispensary at a time, one changed mind at a time, until suddenly you look around and realize the world isn’t what it used to be. That’s exactly what’s happened with cannabis over the past two decades.

Remember when California was the lone wolf with its medical marijuana program? These days, you can walk into a dispensary in more than half of U.S. states and legally purchase cannabis. Hell, you can even light up legally in Germany now. The transformation has been nothing short of remarkable, even if 2024 saw a slight slowdown in the legalization momentum. But make no mistake – this train isn’t stopping. It might hit some speed bumps, but it’s still chugging along toward full legalization.

Now, I know what you’re thinking: “But Reg, what about the upcoming Trump administration? Won’t that put the brakes on everything?” Look, I’ve spent enough time analyzing cannabis policy to know that nothing’s certain in politics. But here’s the interesting part – there’s actually some reason for optimism. With RFK Jr. potentially heading up Health and Human Services, we might see some surprising moves. I’ve written before about how a well-crafted legalization plan could actually be a winner with a Republican-controlled government. Tax revenue, states’ rights, personal freedom – these are concepts that resonate across party lines.

But let’s be real for a minute. Whether it happens under Trump or the next administration or the one after that, cannabis legalization is inevitable. You can’t put this genie back in the bottle. We’re talking about an industry generating billions in legal revenue annually. The cannabis sector isn’t just some hippie dream anymore – it’s a serious economic force with real jobs, real tax revenue, and real political clout.

And here’s the kicker – demographics are destiny. The reefer madness generation is fading away, replaced by millennials and Gen X parents who’d rather spark a joint than open a bottle of wine after putting the kids to bed. Cannabis has been normalized to a degree that would have been unthinkable twenty years ago. When soccer moms are discussing their favorite strains at PTA meetings and grandma is using CBD for her arthritis, you know the cultural shift is complete.

The future is clear: federal legalization in the U.S. is coming, and international legalization will follow. It’s not a matter of if, but when. And when that day comes, we’ll look back at this period of transition and wonder why it took so long to embrace what humans have known for thousands of years – that this plant has the power to heal, to inspire, and to bring people together.

You know what’s wild? While I’ve been covering cannabis for years, watching it slowly transform from counterculture to mainstream, artificial intelligence swooped in like a technological tornado and turned everything upside down practically overnight. And I mean everything.

Let me get personal for a minute. As someone who’s made their living stringing words together, I’ve had a front-row seat to this revolution. Where I used to have editors throwing assignments my way like joints at a Cypress Hill concert, nowadays those gigs have become as rare as schwag weed in a Colorado dispensary. And I’m not alone – this disruption is hitting everyone from artists to lawyers, doctors to factory workers.

Recently, I found myself in the crosshairs of this debate when I mentioned my latest project – a 90,000-word fiction book I’m creating with AI assistance. You’d think I’d announced I was mixing oregano with my cannabis, the way some people reacted. The downvotes came faster than munchies after a dab session. But here’s the thing: I’m not just feeding prompts into a machine and calling it a day. I’m channeling my creativity through this new tool, directing it like a conductor leads an orchestra. Every plot point, every character arc, every emotional beat – that’s all coming from my creative vision.

But try explaining that to the traditionalists. They insist it’s not “real” writing if AI is involved. It’s like arguing with someone who still believes in Reefer Madness – they’re so caught up in their preconceptions that they can’t see the bigger picture. The reality is, this technology isn’t going away. Just like cannabis legalization, we’re past the point of no return.

And let’s be real – this is just the beginning. While I’m catching flak for using AI in writing, companies like Tesla and Boston Dynamics are developing robots that could replace entire workforces. Couple that with AI, and suddenly you don’t need human workers, floor managers, or even middle management. It’s enough to make anyone paranoid, and this time, it’s not the weed talking.

The question isn’t whether AI will transform society – it’s already happening. The real question is what happens to those who can’t or won’t adapt. I’ve chosen to lean into it because I see the writing on the wall. In a few years, companies won’t be hiring copywriters; they’ll be hiring “prompters” who know how to dance with the AI to get results. And they’ll do it for a fraction of what they’re paying now.

Here’s the kicker though – just like cannabis, AI has the potential to either enhance our lives or cause serious problems, depending on how we handle it. The genie’s out of the bottle, folks, and it’s smoking something a lot stronger than we ever imagined. The only choice we have is whether we learn to work with it or let it work us over.

Look, I’ve been around long enough to know when something’s here to stay. Cannabis and AI aren’t just trends – they’re transformative forces reshaping our world faster than you can clear a bong. And just like that friend who says they’ll “just take one hit,” there’s no going back once you start.

The writing isn’t just on the wall anymore; it’s being projected in 8K resolution by an AI while someone blazes a joint in the corner. These industries aren’t just growing; they’re intertwining with every aspect of our lives. Fighting against this reality is like trying to push smoke back into a bowl – pointless and probably going to give you a headache.

So here’s my advice, for what it’s worth: Find your place in this brave new world. Maybe that means developing cannabis-infused products that no one’s thought of yet. Maybe it means becoming the go-to AI prompt engineer for dispensaries looking to automate their marketing. Hell, maybe it means combining both – using AI to optimize grow operations or predict cannabis market trends.

The point is, you can either evolve or get left behind, reminiscing about the “good old days” like that one uncle who still thinks “pot needles” are a thing. And let me tell you, I’ve seen enough of those folks – bitter, resistant to change, watching the world pass them by while they clutch their outdated beliefs like a security blanket.

The future is coming, whether we’re ready or not, and it’s bringing both heavy tech and heavy hits with it. You can either grab your piece of the pie or watch others feast. Personally, I’d rather be at the table than watching through the window.

Remember this: the future is red-eyed and running on neural networks, and no amount of clutching pearls or crying about “the way things used to be” is going to change that. So spark up, power up, and get ready for the ride – it’s going to be one hell of a trip.

 

HUMANS AND AI, NOT THE FIRST GO-AROUND? READ ON…

HUMANS HAD AI BEFORE

HUMANS AND AI, NOT OUR FIRST GO-AROUND? READ THIS!



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

What to Expect for Global Cannabis Law Reform in 2025

Published

on

By


As the U.S. cannabis community awaits the resumption of the DEA’s administrative law hearing on rescheduling marijuana later this month, this blog will take a glimpse at the ever-dynamic global landscape of cannabis policy. While some countries may expand, retract, or maintain the progress seen in 2024, much attention will focus on the key developments that marked the past year. Notably, Europe saw significant movement in cannabis policy.

Key global cannabis law developments in 2024

  • Germany passed a quasi-legalization law with two phases. Phase I, implemented in 2023, legalized cannabis cultivation clubs, home cultivation, and personal possession. Phase II, still in the early planning stages, would introduce regulated marijuana sales through pilot programs. The most impactful change, however, has been the expansion of medical marijuana access, which has surged since the law’s enactment.
  • Poland’s Parliamentary Committee on Petition presented a proposal to decriminalize personal marijuana possession and home cultivation to the Prime Minister. While the proposal is not binding, it could pave the way for future progress, contingent on the outcome of Poland’s May presidential election.
  • The Netherlands, after multiple delays, is poised to meet demand for regulated marijuana through licensed cultivators supplying coffee shops participating in the trial, marking a significant step in its regulated cannabis market.
  • Switzerland expanded its pilot program for the regulated sale of marijuana to more jurisdictions.
  • Ukraine legalized medical marijuana for specific qualifying conditions, marking a major health policy milestone.
  • Thailand, under its new conservative government, opted to regulate rather than reschedule marijuana.
  • Australia held a vote to legalize marijuana at the end of 2024. The vote failed by a vote of 24-13, but this was a monumental step in the country’s shift away from the war on drugs.
  • Italy’s conservative leadership has pushed to ban hemp flower-based products, prompting hemp industry advocates to call for an immediate review of the law’s compatibility with EU regulations. The European Commission’s review could determine the future of Italy’s hemp industry.

What to expect for global cannabis law developments in 2025

Despite the promising advances in 2024, 2025 may see increased resistance from conservative governments opposed to cannabis liberalization. Several countries may face setbacks or even roll back their cannabis reforms:

  • Germany: While several municipalities, including Frankfurt, are moving forward with commercial cannabis pilot programs, the Christian Conservative Party, expected to gain control after February’s snap elections, has indicated opposition to further expansion, particularly Phase II. Despite this, a poll showing 59% support for marijuana legalization suggests that a full reversal of Phase I is unlikely. Even if the Christian Conservatives take power, recriminalizing cannabis would be difficult without forming a coalition that includes pro-cannabis parties, which is unlikely. Thus, while pilot programs may be at risk, the current system isn’t likely to be reversed.
  • The Netherlands: Despite a rightward shift in the 2023 elections, the governing coalition has confirmed it will not halt the regulated coffee shop trials. Delayed by supply issues, these trials are now set to fully implement regulated sales by April of this year.
  • Thailand: Following its election win in 2023, the Pheu Thai Party which initially campaigned on placing cannabis back on the controlled substances list, has softened its stance.  The Party’s initial plans to criminalize marijuana appear to be off the table. The government is now focused on regulating the cannabis market, which may include some form of regulated commercial sales. Restrictions will likely be placed on the current unregulated market, but the shift towards regulation suggests that prohibition is not on the horizon. This move could also position Thailand for entry into the global medical marijuana trade.
  • Czech Republic: Initially aiming for full legalization of commercial cannabis, the Czech Republic shifted focus in 2024 under pressure from the EU regarding UN treaty obligations. Chechia is seeking a framework similar to Germany’s, with provisions for personal cultivation and possession limits. Additionally, the government is working on a regulatory regime for low-THC hemp (not exceeding 1%), including HHC, as part of its “Psychomodulatory Substances” regime.
  • Ukraine: Ukraine’s medical marijuana program, which has faced delays, is set to roll out in early 2025. Initially, it will only serve patients with specific forms of cancer and war-related PTSD. While access will be highly restricted, there is hope that additional conditions may be included in the future. Currently there are no medical marijuana products available to patients, but that is expected to change in early 2025.

Big picture thoughts for cannabis law in 2025

In 2025, conservative governments may pose challenges to expanding cannabis reforms. However, the full repeal of existing cannabis laws seems unlikely.

Recently, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights underscored the failure of the War on Drugs and advocated for a shift toward regulatory frameworks that prioritize public health over punitive measures. These “alternative regulatory approaches” seek to reduce the influence of the black market and cartels, boost tax revenues, and fund social programs aimed at mitigating the impact of drugs on society.

Hopefully these principles will gain traction, and governments will continue moving away from the failed war on drugs in favor of common-sense cannabis regulation.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media