Connect with us

Cannabis News

Should States Run Cannabis Testing Labs to Avoid THC Lab Shopping and Other Marijuana Testing Lab Problems?

Published

on


state run cannabis testing labs

Michigan is considering establishing a specialized lab dedicated to testing marijuana. The primary goal is to ensure the accuracy of information provided by existing testing labs.

 

Termed a ” reference lab,” its responsibilities would include scrutinizing results from other labs, investigating the potential entry of illegal marijuana into the legal market, and assisting in product recalls if necessary.

 

Brian Hanna, the director, estimates the construction and equipping of the lab would cost around $2.8 million, with an additional $1.6 million allocated for ongoing staffing.

Why Michigan Wants a Marijuana Testing Lab

First, the lab would double-check the accuracy of results obtained from other testing facilities. This would ensure that the information provided regarding the strength and composition of marijuana is reliable.

 

Additionally, the cannabis lab would play a crucial role in investigating the presence of illegal marijuana within the legal market, addressing concerns related to the integrity of the marijuana supply chain.

 

Governor Gretchen Whitmer has proposed allocating $4.4 million for this lab in her budget, which would become effective October 1 if approved. While Brian Hanna hopes to initiate the project as soon as possible, a specific timeline for implementation has yet to be provided.

California and Colorado have reference labs with similar functions, and Michigan aims to be a leader in this area.

 

Hanna emphasizes the need for the lab to operate independently, free from external influences, to ensure fairness and a foundation in scientific principles. The proposal arises amid declining trust in the current system for testing marijuana safety.

Why People Want This Lab

One of the primary concerns prompting the establishment of the lab is the potential for false results. There is apprehension that some labs may exaggerate marijuana’s potency to increase its perceived value.

 

 Additionally, worries persist regarding the accuracy of safety tests designed to identify harmful contaminants in marijuana products. A significant recall in November 2021 by the Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) highlighted the unreliability of results from one of the state’s largest testing labs.

 

Lev Spivak-Birndorf, founder and chief science officer for Ann Arbor-based PSI Labs, acknowledges that a state-run lab may not be a cure-all but suggests that an unbiased, state-controlled lab could substantially improve the resolution of disputes over the accuracy of testing results.

 

Currently, labs responsible for testing marijuana are hired by the growers and manufacturers. If the results are unfavorable, these businesses may seek out different labs. The proposed state-run lab aims to ensure the proficiency of all testing labs through regular and surprise tests without prior notice.

 

Governor Whitmer’s budget also earmarks $33.8 million for the Cannabis Regulatory Agency, tasked with overseeing Michigan’s hemp and marijuana industries. The budget anticipates generating nearly $240 million from recreational marijuana excise taxes, with portions allocated to participating counties, local municipalities, the School Aid fund, and road funds.

 

In addition to the proposal for a state-operated marijuana testing lab in Michigan, legislators are currently deliberating a bill to grant the Cannabis Regulatory Agency (CRA) more explicit authority. The CRA considers this legislative move essential to bolster its oversight capabilities over cannabis companies operating within the state.

 

However, the actualization of the laboratory project faces a certain degree of uncertainty, hinging on the bill’s ability to secure three-fourths of support from both the state Senate and House of Representatives. This is particularly crucial as the proposed amendments seek to modify the 2018 voter-approved measure that initially legalized recreational marijuana in Michigan.

 

Legislative Challenges and Subsequent Approval

As the bill’s fate hangs in the balance, awaiting a vote by the House Regulatory Reform Committee, the CRA contends that the lab’s establishment is pivotal for creating objective standards within licensed safety compliance facilities. Currently, no unbiased third-party testing lab exists in Michigan, necessitating an independent reference lab.

 

According to David Harns, a spokesperson for the CRA, the proposed reference lab will play a crucial role in industry standardization. It aims to optimize and verify standard testing methods, thereby enhancing the overall oversight of the cannabis industry through improved audit and investigative capabilities.

 

While the CRA has taken preliminary steps in procuring some lab equipment, the actual construction of the facility has yet to commence. Suppose the legislative and regulatory processes align favorably. In that case, the proposed lab will be built in Lansing, Michigan’s state capital, where the CRA is headquartered.

 

A dedicated team of five staff members will manage the operational aspect, working collaboratively to ensure the lab’s efficacy and adherence to established standards.

Industry Dynamics and Divergent Perspectives

Within the Michigan cannabis industry, the proposal for a state-run testing lab has ignited a polarized debate. Greg Michaud, the CEO of Viridis, a private testing lab, emerges as a vocal opponent of the state-operated lab concept.

 

Michaud questions the state’s ability to execute its duties in a “fair, impartial, and transparent manner.” This skepticism is heightened by Viridis’Viridis’ involvement in litigation against the CRA, stemming from a substantial product recall in 2021.

 

In stark contrast, the Michigan Cannabis Industry Association, representing a robust network of 400 marijuana companies, stands firmly in support of the state-run lab initiative. Members of this trade group are “adamant” that establishing such a lab would significantly improve enforcement measures and contribute to maintaining a level playing field within the industry.

 

Their endorsement emphasizes the belief that a state-controlled facility would serve as an unbiased and authoritative entity, ensuring the reliability and accuracy of testing procedures.

 

Potential Implications and the Road Ahead

As Michigan navigates this complex terrain of legislative, regulatory, and industry dynamics, the proposed state-operated marijuana testing lab holds the potential to reshape the cannabis landscape within the state.

 

If the bill successfully overcomes legislative hurdles and gains widespread support, establishing the reference lab could signify a milestone. It will ensure the integrity and transparency of safety compliance testing in the burgeoning cannabis industry.

 

In the meantime, the CRA’s proactive steps in acquiring the necessary equipment indicate a commitment to the vision of an independent and standardized testing facility. The choice of Lansing as the lab’s location underscores the agency’s commitment to centralizing its operations, aligning the lab with the CRA’s headquarters for efficient coordination.

 

While uncertainties persist, the evolving narrative around the proposed lab showcases the intricacies and divergent perspectives within the Michigan cannabis industry. The ongoing discourse will undoubtedly shape the trajectory of marijuana regulation and testing practices in the state, influencing the standards and protocols that govern the burgeoning cannabis sector in Michigan.

 

As stakeholders continue to express their viewpoints, the eventual outcome will carry implications for Michigan and potentially set precedents for other states grappling with similar challenges in the ever-evolving landscape of legalized marijuana.

 

WHAT IS THC LAB SHOPPING, READ ON…

CANNABIS INDUSTRY DIRTY SECRET LAB SHOPPING

THE WEED INDUSTRY’S DIRTY SECRET – THC LAB SHOPPING!



Source link

Cannabis News

Latest Trump Weed Rumor – Trump Will Federally Deschedule and Decriminalize Cannabis, but Not Legalize It

Published

on

By


trump on marijuana reform

In a recent interview, former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie made headlines by asserting that President-elect Donald Trump will pursue significant reforms in federal policies regarding marijuana and cryptocurrency. As the nation grapples with evolving attitudes toward cannabis and the burgeoning digital currency market, Christie’s predictions have ignited discussions about the potential implications of such changes on both industries. This article delves into Christie’s insights, the current state of marijuana and cryptocurrency regulations, and the broader implications of these anticipated reforms.

 

The Current Landscape of Marijuana Legislation

 

Federal vs. State Laws

Marijuana remains classified as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which places it in the same category as heroin and LSD. This classification has created a complex legal landscape where states have moved to legalize cannabis for medical and recreational use, while federal law continues to impose strict prohibitions. As of now, over 30 states have legalized marijuana in some form, leading to a burgeoning industry that generates billions in revenue.

 

Challenges Faced by the Cannabis Industry

 

Despite its legality in many states, the cannabis industry faces significant hurdles due to federal restrictions. These challenges include:

  • Banking Access: Many banks are hesitant to work with cannabis businesses due to fear of federal repercussions, forcing these businesses to operate largely in cash.

  • Taxation Issues: The IRS enforces Section 280E of the tax code, which prohibits businesses engaged in illegal activities from deducting normal business expenses, leading to disproportionately high tax burdens for cannabis companies.

  • Interstate Commerce: The lack of federal legalization prevents cannabis businesses from operating across state lines, limiting their growth potential.

 

Chris Christie’s Perspective on Marijuana Reform

 

Christie, a former presidential candidate known for his tough stance on drugs during his tenure as governor, has evolved his views on marijuana over the years. In his recent statements, he emphasized that Trump is likely to pursue descheduling cannabis, which would remove it from the Schedule I classification. This move would not only provide clarity for businesses operating in legal markets but also open avenues for banking and investment.

 

Christie highlighted that descheduling would allow for a more regulated market where safety standards could be established, thus protecting consumers. He believes that this approach aligns with a growing consensus among Americans who support legalization and recognize the potential benefits of cannabis use for both medical and recreational purposes.

 

The Future of Cryptocurrency Regulation = The Rise of Cryptocurrencies

 

Cryptocurrencies have surged in popularity over the past decade, with Bitcoin leading the charge as the first decentralized digital currency. The market has expanded to include thousands of alternative coins (altcoins), each with unique features and use cases. As cryptocurrencies gain traction among investors and consumers alike, regulatory scrutiny has intensified.

 

Current Regulatory Challenges

 

The cryptocurrency market faces several regulatory challenges that hinder its growth and adoption:

 

  • Lack of Clarity: Regulatory frameworks vary significantly across states and countries, creating confusion for investors and businesses.

  • Fraud and Scams: The rapid growth of cryptocurrencies has led to an increase in fraudulent schemes targeting unsuspecting investors.

  • Consumer Protection: Without clear regulations, consumers are often left vulnerable to risks associated with volatile markets.

 

Christie’s Vision for Crypto Regulation

 

Christie believes that under Trump’s leadership, there will be an effort to find a “sweet spot” for cryptocurrency regulation balancing innovation with consumer protection. He argues that overly stringent regulations could stifle growth in this emerging sector while too little oversight could expose consumers to significant risks.

 

In his view, a balanced regulatory framework would include:

 

1. Clear Definitions: Establishing clear definitions for different types of cryptocurrencies and tokens to differentiate between securities and utility tokens.

2. Consumer Protections: Implementing measures to protect investors from fraud while promoting transparency within the market.

3. Encouraging Innovation: Creating an environment conducive to innovation by allowing startups to thrive without excessive regulatory burdens.

 

Christie’s insights reflect a growing recognition among policymakers that cryptocurrencies are here to stay and that appropriate regulations are necessary to foster growth while safeguarding consumers.

 

Implications of Proposed Reforms

 

Economic Impact

 

The potential reforms proposed by Christie could have far-reaching economic implications:

 

  • Job Creation: Legalizing marijuana at the federal level could lead to significant job creation within the cannabis industry—from cultivation and production to retail sales.

  • Investment Opportunities: Descheduling cannabis would open up investment opportunities for institutional investors who have been hesitant due to federal restrictions.

  • Boosting Local Economies: Legal cannabis markets have proven beneficial for local economies through increased tax revenues and job creation.

 

Similarly, clear regulations around cryptocurrencies could stimulate investment in blockchain technology and related industries, fostering innovation and economic growth.

 

Social Justice Considerations

 

Both marijuana legalization and sensible cryptocurrency regulations have social justice implications:

 

  • Addressing Past Injustices: Legalizing marijuana could help rectify past injustices related to drug enforcement policies that disproportionately affected marginalized communities.

  • Financial Inclusion: Cryptocurrencies offer opportunities for financial inclusion for those underserved by traditional banking systems, particularly in low-income communities.

 

Political Landscape

 

The political landscape surrounding these issues is complex. While there is bipartisan support for marijuana reform among certain lawmakers, challenges remain in overcoming entrenched opposition. Similarly, cryptocurrency regulation has garnered attention from both sides of the aisle but requires collaboration to establish effective frameworks.

 

Conclusion

 

Chris Christie’s predictions about President-elect Donald Trump’s approach to federal marijuana descheduling and cryptocurrency regulation suggest a potential shift in U.S. policy that could significantly reshape both industries. As public opinion evolves on these issues, lawmakers have an opportunity to enact meaningful reforms that promote economic growth while ensuring consumer protection. The anticipated changes could foster a more robust cannabis industry that contributes positively to the economy and addresses social justice concerns, while clear regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies could encourage innovation and protect consumers in the digital economy. Stakeholders in both sectors are closely watching these developments, eager to see how potential reforms might impact their futures. While the realization of Christie’s predictions remains uncertain, it’s clear that the conversation around marijuana and cryptocurrency regulation is ongoing and far from settled.

 

TRUMP 2.0 ON CANNABIS REFORM, READ ON…

TRUMP ON MARIJUANA REFORM

TRUMP 2.0 ON FEDERAL CANNABIS REFORM – WHAT DO WE KNOW?

 



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Webinar Replay: Post-Election Cannabis Wrap – Smoke ’em if You’ve Got ’em

Published

on

By


On Thursday, November 7th, Vince Sliwoski, Aaron Pelley and Fred Rocafort held a post election discussion “Post-Election Cannabis Wrap – Smoke ’em if You’ve Got ’em”. Watch the replay!

Key Takeaways from the “Smoke ’em if You’ve Got ’em – 2024 Post Election Cannabis Wrap” Webinar:

  1. Panelists:
    • Vince Sliwoski: Oregon Business lawyer specializing in cannabis and commercial real estate.
    • Aaron Pelley: Experienced in cannabis law since Washington’s legalization in 2012.
    • Fred Rocafort: Trademark attorney working closely with the cannabis team.
  2. Election Results Overview:
    • Most 2024 cannabis ballot measures did not pass.
    • Florida, South Dakota, and North Dakota saw failures.
    • Nebraska became the 39th state to legalize cannabis for medical use when it passed two cannabis initiatives, Initiatives 437 and 438.
  3. Federal and State-Level Developments:
    • Medical use is currently legal in 38 states, and 24 states allow recreational use.
    • Republican support for marijuana legalization is growing.
  4. Federal Policy Implications:
    • Schedule III Rescheduling: The process to move cannabis to Schedule III is ongoing, which could significantly impact the industry.
    • Importance of Federal Appointments: The future of cannabis policy depends heavily on who is appointed to key positions in the administration.
  5. International and Domestic Trade:
    • Schedule III status could ease import/export restrictions on cannabis.
    • Unified control of House, Senate, and presidency might expedite legislative progress.
  6. Economic and Industry Impact:
    • Cannabis stocks experienced volatility post-election, reflecting investor uncertainty.
    • Federal legalization and banking reforms are crucial for industry stability and growth.
  7. Future Outlook:
    • The potential for federal rescheduling remains strong, with hearings scheduled for early 2025.
    • State-level initiatives and regulatory developments will continue to shape the industry.

Watch the replay!



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

I Had Just One Puff

Published

on

By


one puff of a joint a drug test

“How Long Does One Puff of Weed Stay in Your System?”… This topic can be difficult to answer since it is dependent on elements such as the size of the hit and what constitutes a “one hit.” If you take a large bong pull then cough, it might linger in your system for 5-7 days. A moderate dose from a joint can last 3-5 days, whereas a few hits from a vaporizer may last 1-3 days.

 

The length of time that marijuana stays in the body varies based on a number of factors, including metabolism, THC levels, frequency of use, and hydration.

 

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, is the primary psychoactive component of cannabis. THC and its metabolites, which remain in your body long after the effects have subsided, are detected by drug tests.

 

Since these metabolites are fat-soluble, they cling to bodily fat molecules. They could thus take a while to fully pass through your system, particularly if your body fat percentage is higher.

 

THC is absorbed by tissues and organs (including the brain, heart, and fat) and converted by the liver into chemicals such as 11-hydroxy-THC and carboxy-THC. Cannabis is eliminated in feces at a rate of around 65%, while urine accounts for 20%. The leftover amount might be kept within the body.

 

THC deposited in bodily tissues ultimately re-enters the circulation and is processed by the liver. For frequent users, THC accumulates in fatty tissues quicker than it can be removed, thus it may be detectable in drug tests for days or weeks following consumption.

 

The detection time varies according to the amount and frequency of cannabis usage. Higher dosages and regular usage result in longer detection times.

 

The type of drug test also affects detection windows. Blood and saliva tests typically detect cannabis metabolites for shorter periods, while urine and hair samples can reveal use for weeks or even months. In some cases, hair tests have detected cannabis use over 90 days after consumption.

 

Detection Windows for Various Cannabis Drug Tests

 

Urine Tests

Among all drug tests, urine testing is the most commonly used method for screening for drug use in an individual.

 

Detection times vary, but a 2017 review suggests the following windows for cannabis in urine after last use:

 

– Single-use (e.g., one joint): up to 3 days

– Moderate use (around 4 times a week): 5–7 days

– Chronic use (daily): 10–15 days

– Chronic heavy use (multiple times daily): over 30 days

 

Blood Tests

Blood tests generally detect recent cannabis use, typically within 2–12 hours after consumption. However, in cases of heavy use, cannabis has been detected up to 30 days later. Chronic heavy use can extend the detection period in the bloodstream.

 

Saliva Tests

THC can enter saliva through secondhand cannabis smoke, but THC metabolites are only present if you’ve personally smoked or ingested cannabis.

 

Saliva testing has a short detection window and can sometimes identify cannabis use on the same day. A 2020 review found that THC was detectable in the saliva of frequent users for up to 72 hours after use, and it may remain in saliva longer than in blood following recent use.

 

In areas where cannabis is illegal, saliva testing is often used for roadside screenings.

 

Hair Tests

Hair follicle tests can detect cannabis use for up to 90 days. After use, cannabinoids reach the hair follicles through small blood vessels and from sebum and sweat surrounding the hair.

 

Hair grows at approximately 0.5 inches per month, so a 1.5-inch segment of hair close to the scalp can reveal cannabis use over the past three months.

 

Factors Affecting THC and Metabolite Retention

 

The length of time THC and its metabolites stay in your system depends on various factors. Some, like body mass index (BMI) and metabolic rate, relate to individual body processing, not the drug itself.

 

Other factors are specific to cannabis use, including:

 

– Dosage: How much you consume

– Frequency: How often you use cannabis

– Method of consumption: Smoking, dabbing, edibles, or sublingual

– THC potency: Higher potency can extend detection time

 

Higher doses and more frequent use generally extend THC retention. Cannabis consumed orally may remain in the system slightly longer than smoked cannabis, and stronger cannabis strains, higher in THC, may also stay detectable for a longer period.

 

How Quickly Do the Effects of Cannabis Set In?

 

When smoking cannabis, effects appear almost immediately, while ingested cannabis may take 1–3 hours to peak.

 

The psychoactive component THC produces a “high” with common effects such as:

 

– Altered senses, including perception of time

– Mood changes

– Difficulty with thinking and problem-solving

– Impaired memory

 

Other short-term effects can include:

– Anxiety and confusion

– Decreased coordination

– Dry mouth and eyes

– Nausea or lightheadedness

– Trouble focusing

– Increased appetite

– Rapid heart rate

– Restlessness and sleepiness

 

In rare cases, high doses may lead to hallucinations, delusions, or acute psychosis.

 

Regular cannabis use may have additional mental and physical effects. While research is ongoing, cannabis use may increase the risk of:

 

– Cognitive issues like memory loss

– Cardiovascular problems including heart disease and stroke

– Respiratory illnesses such as bronchitis or lung infections

– Mood disorders like depression and anxiety

 

Cannabis use during pregnancy can negatively impact fetal growth and development.

 

Duration of Effects

Short-term effects generally taper off within 1–3 hours, but for chronic users, some long-term effects may last days, weeks, or even months. Certain effects may even be permanent.

 

Bottom Line

The amount of time that cannabis remains in your system following a single use varies greatly depending on individual characteristics such as body fat, metabolism, frequency of use, and mode of intake. Frequent users may maintain traces of THC for weeks, whereas infrequent users may test positive for as little as a few days. Hair tests can disclose usage for up to 90 days, while blood and saliva tests identify more recent use. Urine tests are the most popular and have varying detection durations. The duration that THC and its metabolites are detectable will ultimately depend on a number of factors, including dose, strength, and individual body chemistry.

 

PEE IN A CUP COMING UP, READ ON..

how long does weed stay in your urine

HOW LONG DOES WEED STAY IN YOUR URINE FOR A DRUG TEST?



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media