Cannabis News
Smoking a Fatty Doesn’t Make You a Fatty!
Published
3 months agoon
By
admin
Cannabis users are less likely to be obese than non-tokers!
For decades, cannabis users have been unfairly stereotyped as lazy, unproductive individuals with an insatiable appetite for junk food. The image of the “stoner” with a bag of chips permanently attached to their hand has been perpetuated by popular culture, leading many to assume that regular cannabis use inevitably leads to weight gain and obesity. You’d think that everyone who lights up would eventually develop a set of D-cup “moobs” and a waistline to match.
However, reality paints a very different picture. As someone who has been around cannabis users for years, I’ve noticed that the vast majority of people I know who enjoy a toke are far from the couch-locked, overweight caricatures often portrayed in the media. In fact, many of them lead incredibly active lifestyles, hitting the gym, hiking trails, and engaging in various physical activities with enthusiasm.
It turns out that my personal observations aren’t just anecdotal. A recent scientific study has found a fascinating correlation between cannabis use and lower Body Mass Index (BMI). This research challenges long-held assumptions about the relationship between marijuana consumption and weight, suggesting that lighting up might actually be associated with staying lean rather than packing on the pounds.
In this article, we’ll dive deep into this intriguing study, exploring its findings and implications. We’ll examine the potential reasons behind this unexpected connection between cannabis use and lower BMI, considering both physiological and behavioral factors that might contribute to this phenomenon. Finally, we’ll address the burning question on everyone’s mind: Should you start smoking weed to lose weight? Join us as we separate fact from fiction and uncover the truth about cannabis and body composition.
A Deep Dive on the Study
The groundbreaking study reported by Marijuana Moment, set to be published in the journal Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, offers compelling evidence that challenges the stereotype of the overweight cannabis user. Led by Ray Merrill, a professor in Brigham Young University’s public health department, this comprehensive analysis drew from a vast dataset of 735,921 individuals who participated in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System between 2016 and 2022.
The findings are nothing short of remarkable. According to the study, people who had used cannabis within the past month were “31% less likely to be obese than non-users, after adjustment.” Even more striking, the research revealed that “daily marijuana users are 32% less likely to be obese than non-users.” These statistics paint a clear picture: regular cannabis use is associated with a significantly lower likelihood of obesity.
The study didn’t stop at simple comparisons. It uncovered a “dose-response relationship between marijuana use and [body mass index],” meaning that as cannabis use increased, BMI tended to decrease. This relationship held true across various demographic variables, employment statuses, and even certain medical conditions such as asthma, arthritis, and depression.
Interestingly, the prevalence of cannabis use among obese individuals was 35% lower than among non-obese respondents. This consistent pattern suggests a robust correlation between cannabis use and lower body weight that transcends various lifestyle factors.
Professor Merrill’s conclusions are cautiously optimistic. He states, “Marijuana use is correlated with lower BMI,” and even goes so far as to suggest that “As legalization and prevalence of the drug in the U.S. increases, the prevalence of obesity may decline.” However, he also emphasizes the need for healthcare providers to consider both the potential benefits and risks associated with cannabis use.
While the study doesn’t delve deeply into the mechanisms behind this relationship, it does acknowledge that cannabis “may be useful in managing nausea and, as supported by the results of this and other studies, weight loss.” This hints at potential physiological effects that could contribute to lower BMI among cannabis users.
It’s worth noting that the study also found an increase in cannabis use over the 2016-2022 period, particularly in states with legalized recreational markets. Past-month use in these areas saw an 89% increase compared to regions where cannabis remained illegal. Despite this rise in consumption, the inverse relationship with obesity rates held steady.
The research team is careful to point out that while the correlation between cannabis use and lower BMI is clear, causation hasn’t been established. As Professor Merrill advises, “Clinicians should identify patients using marijuana and discuss the potential risks and benefits from the drug for their medical conditions and overall health.”
This study adds to a growing body of research challenging long-held assumptions about cannabis use. It suggests that the relationship between marijuana consumption and body weight is far more complex than previously thought. As legalization continues to spread and more data becomes available, we may need to fundamentally reconsider our understanding of how cannabis affects the human body and metabolism.
The obesity epidemic in the United States has been a growing concern for decades, with rates steadily climbing since the 1980s. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the prevalence of obesity among adults has increased dramatically over the years. In the early 1980s, the obesity rate was around 15%. By 2000, it had climbed to 30.5%, and as of 2022, a staggering 41.9% of American adults are classified as obese.
This rise in obesity rates has had profound implications for public health and the economy. Obesity is linked to a myriad of serious health conditions, including heart disease, type 2 diabetes, certain cancers, and stroke. The financial burden of obesity on society is equally alarming. A 2021 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association estimated the annual medical cost of obesity in the United States at nearly $173 billion. When factoring in lost productivity, the total economic impact soars even higher.
While recent years have seen a cultural shift towards body positivity and acceptance, with slogans like “Fat is beautiful” gaining traction, it’s crucial to distinguish between combating discrimination and ignoring health risks. Critics argue that this movement, while well-intentioned in promoting self-esteem, may inadvertently downplay the serious health consequences associated with obesity. Addressing obesity isn’t about shame or aesthetics; it’s about promoting overall health and longevity.
Given these stark realities, the findings of the recent cannabis study take on a new significance. With cannabis users showing a nearly 30% reduction in the likelihood of obesity, could marijuana legalization offer an unexpected tool in the fight against this public health crisis?
It’s a provocative idea, but not without merit. If the correlation between cannabis use and lower BMI holds true on a larger scale, widespread legalization could potentially contribute to slowing or even reversing obesity trends. Of course, this is speculative and would require much more research to confirm any causal relationship. However, the possibility is intriguing enough to warrant serious consideration and further study.
Imagine a scenario where legal cannabis use, combined with proper education and responsible consumption practices, becomes part of a multifaceted approach to combating obesity. While it’s unlikely to be a silver bullet, even a modest reduction in obesity rates could translate to significant improvements in public health and substantial economic savings.
It’s important to note that advocating for cannabis legalization as an obesity intervention would be a radical departure from current public health strategies. However, as our understanding of cannabis and its effects on the body continues to evolve, we may need to reassess our approach to both drug policy and public health initiatives.
The potential for cannabis to play a role in addressing obesity adds another layer to the ongoing debate surrounding legalization. While arguments for legalization often focus on personal freedom, medical benefits, and economic opportunities, the possibility of positive impacts on obesity rates could provide yet another compelling reason to reconsider prohibition.
As we continue to grapple with the obesity epidemic, it’s crucial that we explore all possible solutions, even those that may seem unconventional at first glance. If there’s even a chance that cannabis legalization could contribute to healthier body weights among the population, it’s a avenue worth exploring. After all, in the face of a public health crisis of this magnitude, we can’t afford to leave any stone unturned.
When it comes to the relationship between cannabis use and lower BMI, there are several factors at play that might explain this counterintuitive connection. First, it’s worth considering that many non-cannabis users often turn to other forms of recreational escape, such as overeating, excessive alcohol consumption, or sedentary activities like gaming. These alternatives can contribute significantly to weight gain.
Contrary to the stereotype of the couch-locked stoner, most cannabis users I know tend to be quite active and creative with their time. They’re often out socializing, skateboarding, painting, making music, or simply enjoying nature walks. Cannabis seems to spark a desire for engagement and experience rather than passive consumption.
Furthermore, cannabis can transform one’s relationship with food. Many users, myself included, develop a newfound appreciation for flavors and textures. This often leads to exploring cooking as a hobby and can result in healthier eating habits. Suddenly, a crisp, vibrant salad becomes an adventure for the taste buds rather than a chore.
There’s also a trend among cannabis users towards greater body consciousness and a desire for overall health. While this doesn’t automatically translate to healthier lifestyles, it does create a mindset more conducive to making positive changes.
Regardless of the exact mechanisms at work, the potential for cannabis to play a role in addressing obesity is an exciting prospect. As we continue to battle this widespread health issue, perhaps it’s time to consider the unexpected allies we might find in the world of cannabis.
HOW CANNABIS REDUCES OBESITY, READ ON…
You may like
-
California Appeals Court Rejects Marijuana Grow Permit, Citing Federal Illegality
-
Expert Lighting Tips For Successful Indoor Growing Weed
-
Acne And CBD: Exploring Alternative Dermatological Solutions
-
Can I Gift Marijuana This Holiday Season?
-
The Best Cocktails For An Easy Festive Thanksgiving
-
420 Vacations: Planning the Perfect Weed Vacation
Cannabis News
California Appeals Court Rejects Marijuana Grow Permit, Citing Federal Illegality
Published
2 hours agoon
November 22, 2024By
admin
In a landmark decision that highlights the tension between state and federal cannabis laws, a California appellate court ruled on October 29th that property owners can refuse to allow the transportation of cannabis across their land via easements, even when the cannabis operation is approved by local authorities.
The Second District Court of Appeal’s unanimous decision draws attention to private property rights in a context where cannabis remains federally illegal, but state law allows licensed cultivation, distribution and sale. Presiding Justice Albert Gilbert stated, “No matter how much California voters and the Legislature might try, cannabis cultivation and transportation are illegal in California as long as it remains illegal under federal law.” JCCrandall LLC v. County of Santa Barbara, Case No. B333201, 2024 WL 4599304, Oct. 29, 2024.
Unless the California Supreme Court grants review – which I would not rule out – the decision empowers private property owners to refuse to contract with cannabis businesses, and restricts local government from approving cannabis operations that implicate the property rights of neighbors who object.
The case at hand
The dispute centered around a cannabis cultivation operation in Santa Barbara County, where JCCrandall LLC challenged a conditional use permit granted by the County to its neighbor, Santa Rita Holdings Inc. The critical issue was that Santa Rita Holdings could only access its 2.5-acre cannabis farm via an unpaved road crossing JCCrandall’s property through a pre-existing easement. JCCrandall grows oats and barley.
JCCrandall’s primary concern? It raised a number of complaints with the Santa Barbara County Supervisors about truck traffic and night operations, which did not gain traction, but in the Court of Appeal JCCrandall focused on what it claimed was potential liability associated with having federally illegal substances transported across its property, even though County regulators found that the Santa Rita operation was fully compliant with state and local laws.
Key legal findings
The appellate court’s decision hinged on several crucial points:
- Property Rights: The court emphasized that “the right to exclude others is the essence of the right of property ownership” and classified it as a fundamental vested right.
- Federal Supremacy: The panel determined that allowing cannabis transportation across private property “defies the Supremacy Clause” of the U.S. Constitution.
- State vs. Federal Law: While cannabis might be legal under California law, the court ruled that federal law’s prohibition takes precedence in this context.
California cannabis industry implications
Legal experts suggest this ruling could have far-reaching consequences for California’s cannabis industry. Section 1550.5(b) of the California Civil Code makes contracts within California involving cannabis lawful and enforceable, and Santa Rita Holdings bet the ranch on that argument. But the Court of Appeal held that the statute could not compel a landowner to allow cannabis to travel across its property on a pre-existing easement. Licensed operators may find it harder to do business because neighbors who have property rights affected by a cannabis business can object, and, under the JCCrandall ruling, local government must yield to those objections.
An example might be a cannabis dispensary that depends on access to its parking lot via an easement or is located in a shopping center where other lessees have rights to object to tenants notwithstanding the approval of the landlord. In cultivation, many cannabis farms depend on vehicular access through easements because they are remote and do not always have direct access to public thoroughfares, or they depend on water sourced from other properties pursuant to agreements made by prior owners who grew traditional crops. These neighbors might not need to show any negative impact on their property, but can argue that they could be found complicit in federally illegal activities.
I think the most problematic language in the JCCrandall ruling is the following, which might draw the attention of the California Supreme Court and cause it to grant review: “For as long as an easement is enjoyed, its mode and manner of use shall remain substantially the same as it was at the time the easement was created. The County argues the easement was used for agricultural purposes. But there is a vast difference between legal and illegal agricultural purposes.” (Emphasis added.) If California has determined that cannabis cultivation is legal – as it has – and state courts routinely enforce contracts involving cannabis, it is a pretty bold step to declare the use of a lawful pre-existing easement illegal simply because the agricultural crop is cannabis and take away easement access from Santa Rita.
Looking ahead
This decision creates new challenges for cannabis businesses in California, and will result in more disputes among neighbors. While the Biden administration has shown signs of easing federal marijuana restrictions, this ruling demonstrates that the federal-state law conflict continues to create significant legal hurdles for the cannabis industry.
California court decisions also can be persuasive authority in other states, so we might see similar litigation (and decisions) elsewhere in the country where cannabis has been legalized.
The case serves as a reminder that despite California’s progressive stance on cannabis, federal prohibition continues to cast a long shadow over the industry’s operations and development. As the cannabis landscape continues to evolve, this ruling may prompt businesses to reassess their property arrangements and local governments will certainly have to reconsider their permitting processes to give more careful consideration to objections by neighbors who claim that their property rights are implicated by cannabis operations.
Note: This post was first published earlier this month on the Alger ADR Blog.
Cannabis News
Autoimmune Conditions Are Rising Fast in American Medicine, Can Cannabis Help?
Published
1 day agoon
November 21, 2024By
admin
Why Are Autoimmune Conditions On The Rise? And How Cannabis Can Help
Autoimmune diseases refer to a group of medical conditions that occur as a result of the immune system attacking your own tissues.
In a normal human body, the immune system is responsible for protecting the body by producing antibodies that prevent toxins, cancer cells, and viruses from harming the body. However, when one is struck by an autoimmune disorder, the immune system is no longer able to distinguish the difference between dangerous cells and healthy cells. As a result, the healthy cells are attacked, too.
Today, we know of around 100 different kinds of autoimmune conditions. Some of the most common examples of autoimmune conditions include rheumatoid arthritis (RA), lupus, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, Type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis (MS), and the Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) to name a few. Others include Graves’ disease, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, psoriasis, and vasculitis.
According to the National Health Council, around 50 million Americans are affected by autoimmune diseases today. This is a conservative estimate, considering that several autoimmune conditions are tricky to treat and so many people go undiagnosed for long periods of time. It’s worrisome to note that there are more people developing autoimmune diseases these days, many of which have reached levels comparable to epidemics.
But cannabis can help!
How Cannabis Can Help Curb And Manage Autoimmune Diseases
Not one single cause is responsible for the alarming growth of autoimmune diseases, though there are several factors at play. While there isn’t just one cause we can point at, it’s certain the reasons lie in our environment. After all, human genetics haven’t changed significantly yet the chemicals, toxins, and pollutants in our food and everyday items have risen dramatically.
In addition, people are getting less sleep than ever; stress rates are through the roof, and people are constantly worried. There is a clear link between psychological stress and physical health as well as immunity, which is why it isn’t unusual – it’s even common – to see many autoimmune disease cases flare up after people experience severe stress caused by grief, an accident, job loss, or the death of a loved one. These highly stressful and traumatic conditions wreak havoc on the body’s immune response, causing inflammation all over the body.
Conventional treatments prescribed to treat autoimmune conditions are focused on taming inflammation; these usually include steroids but also some non-steroidal drugs. These drugs often come with unwanted side effects, but research has shown that cannabis can work with the endocannabinoid system through THC and CBD, as well as other cannabinoids, to simulate similar results. In one study for example, we can see the clear association of the endocannabinoid system for neurodegenerative and inflammatory processes seen in Multiple Sclerosis and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
There has also been an increasing number of studies proving the efficacy of cannabis for treating several autoimmune conditions.
Cannabis For Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple sclerosis is one of the autoimmune conditions where a growing number of studies have come out supporting the therapeutic benefits of cannabis for. In a 2024 study, patients with multiple sclerosis reported several improvements in quality of life after using cannabis-based medical products (CBMPs). For the study, British investigators analyzed the impact of cannabis based medicinal products made from either oil or extracts in 141 patients who were enrolled in the UK Medical Cannabis Registry.
The researchers then analyzed the changes in patient outcomes after a month, then three and 6 months after. According to the patients themselves, they were able to sustain improvements in their mental and physical health after marijuana therapy.
“This case series demonstrates a potential association between the initiation of CBMPs and improved patient reported outcomes in sleep, anxiety, and general HRQoL [health-related quality of life] measures, over six months,” said the study authors. “Additional measures for HRQoL, including various physical and mental health subdomains, also exhibit improvements up to six months when compared to baseline,” the authors concluded.
In another study from 2023, patients with multiple sclerosis reported significant improvements in symptoms after cannabis use. For the study, researchers from the Dent Neurologic Institute in Buffalo, New York, analyzed the medical records of 141 patients with multiple sclerosis, who were also legally authorized to consume medical marijuana products. They then analyzed data from the patients after one up to 4 follow-up sessions after the initial session of cannabis therapy. Sixty-five percent of patients consumed 1:1 THC:CBD tinctures.
According to the authors: “The results of this study indicate that use of MC [medical cannabis] to alleviate symptoms of MS is largely efficacious, with improvement in pain (72 percent of patients), muscle spasticity (48 percent of patients), and sleep disturbance (40 percent of patients) frequently reported.”
“More than half of opioid users at baseline were able to either discontinue or decrease their opioid use after starting MC. The mean daily MME [morphine milligram equivalents] was significantly reduced from the initial visit (51 mg) to the last follow-up visit (40 mg). This is consistent with previous literature showing that MC legalization is associated with decreased opioid use and that MC use is associated with decreased opioid use in patients with chronic pain. These findings indicate that MC may represent an alternative analgesic to opioids for some patients,” they wrote.
Anecdotal Evidence
While more studies are needed to determine cannabis’ effect on other autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, we can rely on anecdotal evidence. In 2020, data from the medical journal, Rheumatology, revealed that patients who have this condition, along with those who have lupus and fibromyalgia, consume cannabis.
In fact, it was reported that marijuana was extremely common especially for patients with fibromyalgia. “In this meta-analysis, we found that one in six patients suffering from rheumatologic disease actively consumes cannabis, reducing pain reduction… A favorable effect of cannabis on pain in our meta-analysis reinforces the idea that cannabis could be used for analgesic purposes,” the authors concluded.
Conclusion
Cannabis is a safe and natural way to help prevent and treat the symptoms of autoimmune disease. It targets inflammation at its root, and is a proven natural way to help cope with stress, pain, insomnia, and inflammation all while protecting the brain. However, it’s important to ensure you medicate with clean, organic sources of marijuana.
AUTOIMMUNE AND CANNABIS, READ ON…
The U.S. Senate’s version of the Farm Bill finally landed this week. They’re calling it the Rural Prosperity and Food Security Act of 2024 (the “Senate bill”). The Senate bill follows on the House’s proposal, called the Farm, Food and National Security Act of 2024 (the “House bill”), offered in May. Neither the Senate bill nor the House bill would preempt state or Indian law regarding hemp or the regulation of hemp products. This means states and tribes will retain a lot of latitude in regulating hemp and hemp-derived products– which gets people fired up.
Aside from giving states some runway, the Senate bill and the House bill differ in key respects regarding hemp. Therefore, these august bodies must confer and reconcile their sundry proposals. That could happen in 2024, but seems more likely in 2025 when the new Congress convenes. As of this week, though, we finally have a framework.
The Senate Bill re-defines “hemp” and defines “industrial hemp”
Section 10016 of the Senate bill (“Hemp Production”) amends the definition of “hemp.” Hemp was defined in the 2018 Farm Bill and removed from the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA), taking us on a truly wild ride. See: What Happened to Hemp? (“What Happened”). The Senate bill also gives us a definition for “industrial hemp.” Here are those definitions, with points of emphasis in bold:
(1) Hemp. The term “hemp” means (A) the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 total tetrahydrocannabinol concentration (including tetrahydrocannabinolic acid) of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis; and (B) industrial hemp.
(3) Industrial Hemp. The term “industrial hemp” means the plant Cannabis sativa L. if the harvested material (A) is only (i) the stalks of that plant, fiber produced from those stalks, or any other manufactured product, derivative, mixture, or preparation of those stalks (except cannabinoid resin extracted from those stalks); (ii) whole grain, oil, cake, nut, hull, or any other compound, manufactured product, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the seeds of that plant (except cannabinoid resin extracted from the seeds of that plant); or (iii) viable seeds of that plant produced solely for production or manufacture of any material described in clause (i) or (ii); and (B) will not be used in the manufacturing or synthesis of natural or synthetic cannabinoid products.
The new regime
Again, the definitional stuff in bold is what I want to emphasize.
First, the Senate bill keeps the THC threshold at 0.3 percent, which is an arbitrary number we’ve been advocating against for years. The Senate bill mirrors the House bill in this respect, though, so we are stuck with this, unless Ron Paul gets his way.
Second, the Senate bill keeps the 2018 Farm Bill’s total THC standard, including THCA. The House bill does this too. This was fairly predictable: in What Happened, I wrote that we could “expect the total THC standard to remain, which means that actual Delta-9 THC won’t be the only metric for calculating THC content.”
We’ve also explained on this blog that the 2018 Farm Bill and USDA rules mandate total THC testing on pre-harvest hemp batches, but do not mandate such testing on post-harvest hemp or hemp products. The Senate bill doesn’t change this paradigm, which means the “loophole” for gas station weed remains open. This proposal is a big win for opponents of the House bill’s “Miller Amendment,” which would narrow the definition of “hemp” to exclude intoxicating hemp-derived substances.
Third, the Senate bill introduces a new definition and framework for industrial hemp. The House bill does this too, albeit slightly differently. The idea here is to invite farmers to grow hemp for fiber and grain purposes, while freeing them from regulatory burdens with the Department of Agriculture and criminal exposure with the Department of Justice. More specifically, for “industrial hemp” growers, the Senate bill:
- removes background check requirements;
- instates “relaxed regulatory requirements” for sampling and inspection methodologies (which will need to be adopted by rule); and
- develops a certified seed program.
The Senate bill also makes any hemp producer ineligible to grow hemp for five years if that producer, “with a culpable mental state greater than negligence, produces a crop of hemp that is inconsistent with that license.”(Hint: use the seed program.) The proof standard here seems like it could be an issue, and even if anyone has been adjudicated as growing marijuana under the guise of hemp, Farm Bill ineligibility seems like a far-off concern.
Bottom line
The big takeaway for me is that the Senate bill leaves the door open for intoxicating hemp products, whereas the Miller Amendment to the House bill does not. Something’s gotta give. And it needs to happen soon, because we’re already long overdue. As I explained in a webinar last week, the Farm Bill deals with the nation’s entire food supply, not just hemp. Therefore, this is not like with the SAFE Banking Act, where we have a proposed law specific to cannabis that may or may not ever pass. The Farm Bill must pass, and soon.
Stay tuned and we’ll keep you updated on any major happenings. For more on this topic, check out our massive hemp and CBD archive, or these specific, recent posts:
California Appeals Court Rejects Marijuana Grow Permit, Citing Federal Illegality
Expert Lighting Tips For Successful Indoor Growing Weed
Acne And CBD: Exploring Alternative Dermatological Solutions
Can I Gift Marijuana This Holiday Season?
The Best Cocktails For An Easy Festive Thanksgiving
420 Vacations: Planning the Perfect Weed Vacation
Can Microdosing Help Manage Holiday Family Anxiety
11 Weed Shows and Movies on Netflix Worth Watching
Lawsuit Says DEA Acting In Bad Faith Over Marijuana
Autoimmune Conditions Are Rising Fast in American Medicine, Can Cannabis Help?
Distressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™
United States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)
What you Need to Know
Drug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog
NCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program
It has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax
Cannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022
A new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse
Your Go-To Source for Cannabis Logos and Designs
UArizona launches online cannabis compliance online course
Trending
-
Cannabis News2 years ago
Distressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™
-
One-Hit Wonders2 years ago
United States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)
-
Cannabis 1012 years ago
What you Need to Know
-
drug testing11 months ago
Drug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog
-
Education2 years ago
NCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program
-
Cannabis2 years ago
It has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax
-
Marijuana Business Daily2 years ago
Cannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022
-
California2 years ago
A new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse