Connect with us

Cannabis News

Supreme Court Denies One Case On Gun Rights For Marijuana Consumers, But Justices Will Discuss Several Others This Week

Published

3 weeks ago

on

The US Supreme Court has reduced the lists of the federal ban ownership of people using marijuana, decreases in the decrease in about half a dozen to discuss justifications in a closed door meeting on Friday.

On Tuesday, the Court requested a request USA v. Baxter922 (g) (g) (3) includes the challenge of the federal statute known. This is not particularly surprising, however, when the Department of Justice and Kesizio Daveon Baxter had a prosecuted case, due to the illegal user of a substance controlled by a substance controlled by the court. That came case It was back from the U.S. Appeal Court for the eighth circuit.

But the advocates have a close connection against the constitutional of the banner of cannabis consumer.

DOJ specifically asked justice while holding a case on the subject especially on the subject. He case, Us v. Hemanani, While they use cannabis and cocaine a person who is convicted of having firearms and took part in the drug without sales. The beneficial government will be seen in view of the involvement of drugs beyond Marijuana.

Last week there were many cases waiting for a closed door meeting. This is not clear when that happened, but the rest of the case holes were updated on Tuesday to indicate that they intend to consider this Friday.

Along with Hemano, this week the private conference should be discussed in other cases waiting for gun rights to marijuana consumers US v. Cooper, US v. Daniels and By v. Sam.

Meanwhile, in the last interviews with Marijuana Master, several Republicans shared their opinions Federal property of people using marijuana-Is say that alcohol drinkers can legally buy and buy firearms and use firearms, the same standard should be applied to cannabis consumers.

One by one, US Appeal Court for the tenth circuit With a district federal court, Jared Michael Harrison ruled out, after charging in 2022, in 2022, the police found cannabis and hand in his hand in the traffic stop.

The case has been directed to this lower court, which determined that the current statute prohibits the “illegal” marijuana that violates the second change in the Constitution.

The lower court has a large extent Interpretation of a judgment of the Supreme Court Justifications generally created a greater standard for policies that seek to establish restrictions on gun rights.

The judge stated that such restrictions must come in line with the historical context of the second correction 1791.

Historical analogic analogy based on the Department of Justice, the ban, to prevent Catholics, Loyalists, slaves and Indians to prevent guns to be consistent.

The Circuit Court, for his part, “Government said that Marijuana used marijuana used to risk future risk” to support today’s policy. “This query that can find this event is best for range.”

Meanwhile, in the U.S. Appeal Court for the eleventh district, The judges did the medical side of cannabis patients Having firearms who want to use their second correction rights.

Like a The latest reports of the Congress Research Service (CRS) explained the current legal landscapeThe growing Court is growing “to find constitutional problems for banning firearms.”

In the last command, the Three US Judge Panel for the eighth circuit The convent of a defendant left blank and the lawsuit returned to courtWhether the jury could be necessary for the jury, whether the defendant was dangerous or was a compelling threat to others.

A The third circuit distinguished in a published view of the district courts must be “individualized judgments” to determine whether 922 (3) is constitutional as applied to individual defendants.

–
Marijuana is a moment Monitoring of hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy invoices This year’s state legislatures and congresses. Patreon supporters At least $ 25 / monthly enter our interactive maps, graphs and listening to the listening calendar, so they do not lose development.

Learn more about us Marihuana Bill Tracker and become Assistant Patreon to get access.
–

This year before, the federal Judge of Rhode Island banned that the prohibition was constitutional applied to two defendantsThe government indicated that Marijuana users have not established the ban on gun property ban in the historical background.

The government ruled by a federal judge of El Paso was constantly governed by the government Marijuana is a constitutional ban owner of regular users’ guns He gave the crime earlier in the case of a defendant. The court gave a man to retire the claim and ordered the accusation against him.

DOJ has claimed in many cases in recent years Statute prohibits cannabis consumer to possess or possess guns It is constitutional because the “dangerous” individual is in line with the history of the nation to disarm.

In 2023, for example, the Department of Justice said the U.S. Appeal Court told the third circuit for the third circuit that supports historical historical predictions. Consumers with cannabis guns have a special danger to society, claimed by the Bid Administration, partly “Unlikely” to save his weapon properly.

Meanwhile, some states have passed their laws, while both relating to Marihuana to take care of or attempt to take care of the gun rights.

Legislative Pennsylvania recently presented an invoice Remove state barriers to marijuana patients who carry firearms.

Colorado entrepreneurs also tried to classify an initiative for November to vote, which should protect the secondary correction rights of marijuana consumers, but The campaign signature collection unit was shortly shortened.

As you approach 2024, ATF gave a warning to Kentucky’s neighbors that, if they choose to participate State Marijuana Medical Program for Starting Starting StartingUnder the federal law, buying firearms will be prohibited.

The officer had already said people who are not firearms “expected, if they become patients in legal status,” those who want to follow the federal law “and not to be decisive of the distribution of these firearms”.

Since then, Bipartisan State legislators entered Kentucky will require legislation law legislation law To clarify that medical marijuana users can legally have firearms, it has not taken any action in this invoice.

Kentucky Gov Andy Beshear (D) said he had protected legislative effort in January to request a representation of the State Congress Call federal reform medical marijuana patients to protect secondary correction rightsBut the governor added that the change in the federal level wanted to see even more.

Marijuana is possible with the help of readers. If you are based on journalism to defend cannabis, consider the commitment to Patreon every month.

Become patreon guard!

(Tagstotranslate) highlighted

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Report reveals California cannabis cultivation and regulatory process puts Tribal cultural resources at risk

Published

14 hours ago

on

November 3, 2025

By

A comprehensive new report by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, and Northeastern University reveals that California’s cannabis cultivation threatens Tribal cultural resources. As in other fields of development, however, protecting these resources faces systemic challenges.

Based on the findings of a two-year survey of tribal and agency representatives across the state, the survey found that the state’s current consultation policies, while stronger than in many other states, are inadequate and inconsistently applied, leading to significant risks of irreparable damage to tribal cultural heritage.

“Our research shows a significant disconnect between state policy and the experiences of California’s indigenous tribes. The current cannabis permitting system, while well-intentioned, does not adequately protect ancestral lands and cultural resources,” said Jennifer Sowerwine, the project’s principal investigator and a UC Cooperative Extension specialist in UC Berkeley’s Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management. “It’s not just about historic preservation; it’s about respecting tribal sovereignty and perpetuating old damage by this new industry. These findings provide a clear roadmap for the state to move beyond performative consultation to a process that is truly meaningful and just.”

Jeremy Sorgen, principal investigator of the project and research faculty at Northeastern University’s Oakland campus, said, “One of the first things we’ve heard from Tribal Historic Preservation Officers and county officials involved in cultural resource protection efforts is that cannabis cultivation occurs on lands that are highly likely to be sensitive to Tribes.”

A good place to grow cannabis can be a Tribal cultural resource
“If it’s relatively flat, near a water source and facing south, it can be not only a good place to grow cannabis, but also a ceremony or a village site or some other place of cultural significance to the tribes,” said Sorgen, who is also a researcher at the UC Berkeley Cannabis Research Center. “What this means is that cannabis producers, historically and today, are actively selecting Tribal cultural resources.”

In 2014, California Assembly Bill 52 amended the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, to include statutory requirements for the protection of tribal cultural resources. This law was enacted shortly before Proposition 64 legalized the use of cannabis in 2016. The study “Examining Tribal Sovereignty over Cannabis Permitting on Native Ancestral Lands” investigated the intersection of these two laws and found that AB 52, while strengthening Tribal consultation at the local level, retains the same problems as previous state and federal cultural resources laws.

The study was designed, conducted and analyzed in collaboration with the seven-member Tribal Advisory Committee, and included comprehensive surveys of 46 Tribal representatives and 56 agency officials, along with 61 in-depth interviews conducted across the state.

The report offers several recommendations for the Department of Cannabis Control and other state agencies to address these systemic problems. Key recommendations include: Working directly with tribal governments to develop fairer consultation processes and accurate maps of ancestral lands. Other recommendations include starting consultations as soon as a permit application is received, providing specific funding and training to Tribes and agency staff involved in consultations, and promoting stronger data sharing agreements between state, local, and Tribal governments.

The new tools support Tribal sovereignty in the consultation
Based on the research findings, the research team and Tribal consultants have developed two sets of tools to support tribal controls in the consultation process.

“California has some of the strongest cultural resource protection laws in the US, but meaningful consultation is undermined by structural problems in the consultation process,” said Shasta Gaughen, environmental director and historic preservation officer for the Pala Band of Mission Indians and a member of the Tribal Advisory Board. “We brought together Tribal historic preservation officials from across the state to develop a toolkit that reflects Tribal consultation experiences, is concise and easy to use, and empowers Tribes, not agencies, to set consultation requirements.”

The By Tribes, For Tribes Consultation Policy Toolkit provides a customizable Consultation Policy template and additional materials for Tribes looking to create their own consultation policies or ordinances. The “by Tribes, for Tribes” approach allows Tribes to proactively guide government agencies in consultative processes based on Tribal preferences, rather than reacting to agency interpretations as required by law.

The UC Berkeley Cannabis Site Mapping Tool provides Tribes with a means to assess the extent of cannabis cultivation on their ancestral or aboriginal land. It can be used to determine possible threats to tribal cultural resources and sensitive sites.

Source: Mavens Notebook

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Nebraska Tribe Says State Officials Are Punishing It For Legalizing Marijuana By Suspending Talks On Separate Tobacco Tax Deal

Published

14 hours ago

on

November 3, 2025

By

“People need to understand that this issue is still going to be fought hard to the end, even though I think the voters of Nebraska have spoken.”

Zach Wendling, Nebraska Examiner

The The Omaha tribe in Nebraska is moving forward with legalizing marijuanathe tribe’s attorney general says Nebraska officials used them to disrupt negotiations over an unrelated state-tribal tobacco tax deal.

The tribe called the move “just retaliation.”

Omaha Tribe Attorney General John Cartier said an assistant state attorney general called him Monday, an hour before the tribe’s first cannabis commission meeting. Cartier learned that state officials would no longer negotiate a tobacco tax deal because of the tribe’s more permissive stance on marijuana.

The Omaha Tribal Council voted unanimously in July legalize medical cannabis and recreational marijuana for adults. The initial focus of the tribe’s cannabis commission is “strictly” medical cannabis.

“It gave me pause for about 30 seconds there because I didn’t really anticipate that level of obstruction,” Cartier told the Nebraska Examiner on Thursday. “At least I appreciated the honesty and the honesty of it.”

If a tobacco tax deal gets the green light, states and tribes could split revenue from tobacco sales on the reservation. It could be a new potential hundreds of thousands of dollars for the tribe.

The Omaha Tribe’s reservation is located in northeastern Nebraska, more than 300 square miles, primarily in Thurston County and parts of neighboring Burt and Cuming Counties.

‘Direct retaliation’

In a follow-up interview with Attorney General Mike Hilgers (R) this week, Cartier said Hilgers indicated his office would confirm the state’s official position and how Gov. Jim Pillen (R) wanted to proceed.

Pillen asked Hilgers this summer to negotiate the contract on behalf of the State of Nebraska. The AG’s Office declined to comment on the intense negotiations. Pill’s office did not respond to questions about the dispute this week.

Cartier said he doesn’t foresee any change because “none of them fundamentally believe in the cannabis industry.” He said the AG’s Office also plans to spend additional tax dollars on more policing of the Omaha Tribe’s border because of the new tribal law.

“If that’s their official position, in our opinion, that’s direct retaliation, to potentially shirk their responsibilities legally and use this as leverage,” Cartier said.

Cartier added, “People need to understand that this issue is still being fought to the hilt, although I think the voters of Nebraska have spoken, and they should honor that.”

“two plus two is four”

In November 2024, voters overwhelmingly voted to allow someone to possess 5 ounces of medical cannabis with a doctor’s prescription. Voters also created a new state commission to regulate the new drug. The state board’s rules would eventually allow the purchase of medical cannabis in the state, a milestone not expected until at least mid-2026.

Hilgers has argued that cannabis should remain illegal because federal law classifies marijuana as a Schedule I drug; The federal government says the drug has a high potential for abuse and has not approved it for medical use. A bipartisan group of advocates has called for drug rescheduling for decades.

Congress has repeatedly prohibited the US Department of Justice from interfering with state medical cannabis programs. Advocates, including from Nebraska, have pointed to the Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution to protect states’ rights to legalize marijuana.

“I think two plus two is four, even though everyone else says two plus two is five,” Hilgers said in May.

Pillen says he has always supported medical marijuana, but wants it strictly regulated to prevent a slide into legalizing recreational use. In September 2023, as advocates prepared for a third and ultimately successful petition campaign, Pillen said access to medical cannabis should only come with the approval of the US Food and Drug Administration. That hasn’t happened yet.

Nebraska followed dozens of other states in passing medical cannabis laws in 2024, a nationwide push Hilgers acknowledges is part of voter frustrations. He called the failure to enforce the laws created by the federal government “a colossal failure.”

“I’m a big guy. It doesn’t bother me,” Hilgers, a former state lawmaker, said of opponents of his policy stance. “I’ve been through wars. What people mean, they mean.”

Hilgers’ office has not publicly commented on the tribe’s position on marijuana.

Negotiations began in July

Cartier said the Omaha tribe contacted Pillen in July to begin discussing the tobacco tax deal. The Santee Sioux Nation has that agreement, which allows the Santee Sioux to retain 75 percent of tobacco tax revenue. The Omaha tribe says it wants to keep 90 percent of the tobacco tax revenue from the state’s additional regulatory obligations, subject to negotiations.

State and tribal officials met in August on a tobacco tax contract, a meeting Cartier said was “very productive” and left “hopeful for real progress.” The state promised to offer suggestions or a counter proposal within weeks.

“After months and months of promises and negotiations that they have to take away from us at the last minute, it really makes no sense to me,” Cartier said.

Cartier said it’s easy to get emotional or moved by such a response, which he described as a continuation of the government’s punishment of Native Americans “for just existing.” He said the Omaha Tribe is working to support its members and has adopted a policy that could provide millions in economic development and job opportunities without relying on the federal government.

A contrasting tribal committee

Cheyenne Robinson, secretary of the Omaha Tribal Council, said Monday she was excited about the “historic day” for the people of Omaha.

“We are moving forward to commit to our sovereignty, responsible regulation and economic diversification,” Robinson said. “Looking forward to what’s to come.”

Jason Sheridan, chairman of the Omaha Tribe Council, said Monday that every member of the council knew someone who could benefit from medical marijuana. He said he was glad the tribe was moving forward.

“I just trust all of you,” Sheridan told the committee.

The Omaha Tribe on Monday swore in four members to its cannabis commission: Jayzon Hundley, Amanda Hallowell, Arthur Isagholian and Allison Stockman. Cartier is also on the board as a non-voting member. The tribe can add one more member.

Hundley, the tribe’s grant accountant, and Hallowell, a registered nurse, are members of the Omaha Tribe. Isagholian, who has experience in agriculture, and Stockman, who has experience in public safety and public health, bring about 40 years of experience in the cannabis sector in other states.

The initial meeting included a discussion of future board rules and regulations, with a focus on testing marijuana products for safety and how to navigate a potentially hostile situation beyond its borders. One solution may be to try out the reserve products.

“Even if we think we have a legal right … they’re probably more than willing to fight it in court,” Cartier told commissioners Monday, referring to the Nebraska AG’s Office.

Cartier said the tribe will defend its sovereignty and laws if necessary. The committee will meet next November 19, and then it can approve its rules.

‘Driver’s Seat’

The Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission’s state regulations regarding final approval have been criticized by many as overly burdensome. The restrictions include allowing 12 dispensaries statewide.

Nebraskans must receive a medical cannabis-specific recommendation from a physician registered with the state’s medical cannabis program to enter a licensed state dispensary. Dispensaries could not sell combustible products, vapes, edibles or raw flowers. Couldn’t buy more than 5 grams of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) every 90 days the part associated with most cannabis.

The state board could finalize its regulations and seek final approval of Hilgers and Pill as soon as Monday.

Cartier said the tribe hopes to provide “significant opposition” to state regulations and promote access to medical cannabis, an issue he said would have “nothing to do” with tobacco taxes.

“We decided now is a good point to take this to the public, without waiting for a response from the attorney general and the governor Hilgers, because from our point of view we are not in this,” Cartier said. “We are in the driver’s seat, and we want to maintain that attitude.”

This story was first published by the Nebraska Examiner.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Demand for high-quality substrates is strong worldwide

Published

2 days ago

on

November 2, 2025

By






Ziegler Erden has opened a new production site in Latvia






© Ziegler Erden

German soil and substrate producer Ziegler Erden has officially opened a new production facility for professional horticultural substrates in Talsi, Latvia. The family company invested around 5 million euros in its subsidiary ZIBU Ventspils SIA. The installation was completed in just under five months and is now fully operational.

“The demand for high-quality substrates is high worldwide, as more and more countries plan to grow healthy food inland. A good peat-based substrate is the foundation of this and remains an essential raw material for global food security,” says Managing Director Matthias Ziegler.

Gregor Ziegler GmbH, headquartered in Stein near Plößberg (Upper Palatinate, Germany) is an internationally active second generation family business. The decision to invest in Latvia was due to the increase in demand for professional gardening substrates and the decrease in demand for peat in the hobby sector as a raw material. “With this step, we have set the path to continue marketing our Latvian peat resources in the best possible way,” added Matthias.

© Ziegler Erden

Weak peat crop
Although this year’s peat harvest has been historically weak due to poor weather conditions, the company remains positive about the overall evolution of the market. As one of Germany’s largest independent soil manufacturers, Ziegler is considered a pioneer in peat-free substrates, a valuable strength in difficult years. “We have decades of experience in developing and producing low-peat substrates at our German site. Especially this year, this expertise allows us to incorporate peat alternatives to compensate for limited peat availability,” says Matthias.

© Ziegler Erden

© Ziegler Erden

Ziegler Erden has been active in Latvia for more than 20 years and currently employs around 60 people, managing around 1,000 hectares of peatland and substrate production areas. Ninety-nine percent of products manufactured in Latvia are exported worldwide.

Sales are mainly handled through distributors, either under their own label or under Ziegler’s PLANTOP brand. “We want to focus completely on production and invest all our know-how to achieve the highest quality and productivity,” explains Matthias.

© Ziegler Erden

The company produces substrates with a wide range of formulations tailored to the needs of the client. Peat is screened into various fractions (eg 0-5mm, 0-10mm, 10-30mm or 20-40mm) and compressed into large bales for export to customers around the world. The company has also invested in a hood extension system to provide weatherproof protection to its substrates. Container sizes from 20 to 250 liters are filled on two fully automated packaging lines. Label-specific printing is standard.










Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media