Connect with us

Cannabis News

Texas Supreme Court Refuses To Take Up Marijuana Case Challenging State’s Rejection Of Local Decriminalization Law

Published

on

The Supreme Court of Texas has declined to appeal on the issue on a lawsuit about the state.

About five months after the statement of the fifteenth-state appeal He rejected a lower judge who refused temporary order To prevent law enforcement, the case was the case for the State Supreme Court on Friday.

“The Supreme Court of Texas did not listen to the hand of the hand, and 82 percent of the San Marcos voters do not care,” Catina Voellinger was behind the Earth’s Executive Director of Texas and other reforms.

“This is not only about marijuana. Whether it should be work to make our decisions, as the Constitution of Texas said, Voellinger said.

The judgment of the lower court, and marks the delays of the following Supreme Court-prison delays to vote for activists that have promoted loads. Many of them competed with the main Texas lawyers Ken Paxton (R).

“Texas has the most employee of the country, most of them to win 15 hours or less. Politicians like Millionaire politicians twisted Politicians like Ken Paxton to protect themselves and his rich donors,” said Voellinger. “We think we see what’s going on, but we know how difficult they did to survive here. We try to spend all the time because they know the truth: power is happening to us. And we are building a movement that cannot be stopped.”

Eric Martinez, Mano Amiga’s executive director of Mano Amiga collaborated with the Earth Game. celurbill The decisions of the High Court “worked for a better job of local democracy and San Marcos, brown, white, immigrant and poor work.”

“The Supreme Court of Texas had to stand for the will of the voters and our communities were unintentionally. We will let us not take away all of us. This combat will be stronger than the move here.”

According to the court’s court, the Judiciary decided that he denied a constitutional right to the city’s government “, the State statutes” prohibits the non-existence of the Local Government to enforce the laws of the drug “.

“Texas laws provide local governments and law enforcement authorities, such as the authority to enforce the drug laws. The 370,003 section provides a policy that takes the city of San Mark to the table,” he said.

“It was not necessary to avoid the order to remove unless legislature for legislature to prevent the legislature,” the court has continued. “The ordinary reading of the ordinance presents the perfect inconsistency 370,003. Section.”

St. Marcos was a November 2022 in November elections, the voters accepted similar decline initiatives after the earth game and Mano Amiga defend after the action.

Ordinances Police could not be given a reference to Maryhuana marijuana for A and B, with limited exceptions, such as connecting to a research case in a national research violation in a narcotic case.

The measurement also said that police could not give a references to waste or paraphernal instead of a property charge. And they could not use the only smell of cannabis as a cause for search or seizure.

Despite the state resistance and the latest developments in St. Mark, the defenders have seen several courts in the face of the law.

For example, in February, the Texas judge has decided that last year can be implemented by cannabis disengage law approved by Dallas votersDenying the demand for the State Lawyers He wanted to temporarily block the reform as a lawsuit.

This does not mean that Paxton’s dispute is completely dead. But, at least for now, the referee determined that the minimum policy may follow the case as it expands the issue.

The Dallas Police Department ordered the agents Leave to arrest or mention people to get Marijuana four ouncesvoter by approved voting initiative.

The Government has been opposed to the efforts of the Greg Abbott (R) Municipal Canadian reform.

“Local communities, such as people, cities and county, have no authority to overwrite the state law” Governor said in the last May “If they want to see another law, they have to work with their legislators. Let’s work the law, as a state that will pass a part of the law.”

He said he would bring “chaos” and to create a “impossible system”, to “select and choose the laws for the individual cities,” to meet the state.

ABBOTT Before he said he Doesn’t believe people must be in the prison of marijuana ownership-The most often suggested that Texas had already gave a policy of dismissal to that end.

In 2023, the Earth Games report released Marijuana examined the effects of reform law. The measure found hundreds of people out of prison, as they have been aimed at the enforcement of the law in several cities. Initiatives have also promoted the search for voters, reporting the report.

As The measure of the decline in cannabis went before the voters of San Antonio It was a complete defeated that year, but this proposal does not have the unrelated provisions to avoid enforcing abortion restrictions.

Meanwhile, in Texas, a debating discussion in the legislature has occurred in the legislature of Texas Hemp Policy, some Thc to obtain a ban on cannabis products. But these efforts have fallen short in conventional and special sessions this year.

Governor, in response, signed an executive command last week Institute’s age and labeling conditions for hemp products.


Marijuana is a moment Monitoring of hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy invoices This year’s state legislatures and congresses. Patreon supporters At least $ 25 / monthly enter our interactive maps, graphs and listening to the listening calendar, so they do not lose development.


Learn more about us Marihuana Bill Tracker and become Assistant Patreon to get access.

One by one, Texas officials took another step to set the law significantly expand the state marijuana medical program-Proposing rules, doctors recommend new Qualifications of cannabis and create standards for authorized devices for inhallation, legislators and governors according to the legislation.

Last month, the Department of Public Safety (DPS) published many additional rules in the register Increasing the number of Medical Medical Medical Medical Medical Marijuana Under the legislation below recently.

Dps After all, it will be the issue of 12 new licenses in the state. There are only three today. Additional licenses will be passed to a competitiveness process, with officials to optimize access to public regions of Texas public health.

The first round of licenses will be screened at 139 applicants in 2023. DPS in 20023. Will select nine licensed licenses that have not received a license.

The group 2023 can still revise their requests until September 15th. News will also be presented by the owners to present the applications.

Courtesy of the image item Anonmos.

Marijuana is possible with the help of readers. If you are based on journalism to defend cannabis, consider the commitment to Patreon every month.

Become patreon guard!

(Tagstotranslate) highlighted

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Opening the doors to standardized cannabis propagation

Published

on

By

Twenty cannabis growers from all over Europe and the world recently gathered in Austria for another industry event: a one-day invitation-only masterclass on cannabis propagation, hosted by Fluence, one of Europe’s largest cannabis clone producers, at the Flowery Field in Vienna.

The day included lectures, live demonstrations and a rare guided tour through a facility that is usually closed to outsiders. “It was a good mix of practice and theory,” says Fluence’s Theo Tekstra. “In the morning we had a theoretical block, then we had an in-depth tour of the tissue culture laboratory and the mother plant and reproduction areas, and in the afternoon a practical workshop. Everyone saw and participated in the whole process.”

© Fluence BioengineeringA cannabis tissue culture clone in the early rooting hardening phase was demonstrated at the Flowery Field hands-on session, demonstrating propagation techniques with Fluence LED lighting.

Historical installation
Flowery Field was founded by Alexander Klima, a former law student who noticed that Austrian regulations discriminated between plants and their uses. In practice, this means that cannabis can be sold as an ornamental plant, as long as it is not harvested for consumption.

What started as a small shop selling houseplants along with cannabis cuttings, has since become a major production site, with a hundreds of square meters of mother plant and tissue culture laboratory where eight technicians work every day. The company now focuses entirely on cannabis clones, supplying customers in Austria and neighboring countries, often with same-day delivery to selected locations.

Standardized expansion
For Franz Joseph Sima, Fluence’s long-time propagation specialist, the masterclass aimed to show how standard procedures transform the mother and clone phases of cannabis production. “Many producers still have challenges in the expansion phase,” he said. “At Flory Field, these processes have been refined over twenty years. We wanted participants to see how a consistent and commercially viable system works in practice.”

The workshop covered everything from mother plant maintenance and replacement schedules, to light intensity, watering and pest management. The attendees received the full procedure afterwards. “The only condition,” says Franz, “was to be there.”

© Fluence BioengineeringFranz Josef Sima, Cannabis Research & Plant Specialist at Fluence, guiding participants through best practices in mother plant maintenance and clone cutting.

From tissue culture to mother plant
Participants followed the entire production chain, from tissue culture and virus testing in the laboratory, to cutting and preparation of clones. Flowery uses PCR testing to ensure cultivar stability and purity, a practice more common in pharmaceutical or ornamental horticulture than cannabis.

“The contrast was striking,” says Theo. “You have this sterile white lab on one side, and on the other a fully commercial clone factory based on the mother plants. Seeing both under one roof gave people a real sense of scale.”

Opening the doors
One of the main takeaways from the day was the atmosphere of openness. “In the Dutch horticulture industry, growers thrived by visiting each other and sharing knowledge,” says Theo. “In cannabis, everyone tends to close their doors. Events like this are a step to change that.”

The small group format helped. What began as quiet observation soon turned into a back-and-forth of ideas, with growers comparing notes, solving problems, and sharing their methods.

© Fluence BioengineeringAttendees of the Fluence Propagation Masterclass at Flowery Field in Vienna, a meeting of cannabis cultivation professionals from all over Europe.

Interest in the event exceeded expectations, Franz and Theo both say, and Fluence is already considering repeating the format. “We can do another show in the same place, and maybe even one in the US. It’s something that people can clearly see. In cannabis, very few cloning procedures have been proven for a decade or more, so showing something that has stood the test of time makes a big difference.”

For one day, Flowery Field opened its doors, its laboratories and its mother rooms to a small but focused group of professionals. “In a sector where practical knowledge tends to be kept close to the box, that alone was worth a visit,” concludes Theo.

If you are interested in participating in Fluence Masterclass events across Europe, please get in touch (email protected)

For more information:
fluency
https://fluence-led.com/

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Oregon Officials Seek To Dismiss Psilocybin Access Lawsuit From Homebound Patients

Published

on

By

“Delays in enabling access mean that patients who achieved relief from debilitating anxiety and depression will die in unrelieved suffering.”

Author: Jack Gorsline, Filter

A The legal battle between the state of Oregon and a group of psilocybin boosters has intensified after the state asked for a second time to throw out their lawsuit.

The group originally sued the Oregon Health Authority in 2024 to prevent disabled and dying Oregonians from accessing psilocybin under the state’s Psilocybin Services Act. At the heart of their complaint is that by limiting services to licensed centers and excluding those who cannot travel, the state is violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The plaintiffs, a group of specialty psilocybin suppliers, filed their brief in a federal District Court in Oregon on October 10, challenging the state’s second attempt to dismiss the case.

The Oregon Health Authority (OHA) filed a motion for judgment on the allegations that the plaintiffs lacked standing to state a claim under the ADA. terminally ill and disabled customers.

That motion was followed by a similar motion filed by OHA and a motion to dismiss the case on similar grounds. it was denied in June

Attorneys for the plaintiffs argue that the OHA is trying to avoid reviewing the merits of the case, thereby perpetuating the illegal exclusion of a vulnerable population.

“Plaintiffs’ promoters have complained enough on their behalf and on behalf of their disabled and dying clients,” said Kathryn Tucker of the National Psychedelic Association, one of the attorneys representing them.

He said the state’s position attempts to sidestep the ADA compliance requirement in the operation of the Psilocybin Services Act.

“OHA seeks to avoid compliance with the ADA in the operation of the PSA, as it unlawfully discriminates against Oregonians,” Tucker said. The filter. “Delays in enabling access mean that patients who achieved relief from debilitating anxiety and depression will die in unrelieved suffering.”

The Psilocybin Services Act, passed by Oregon voters in 2020 to establish a legal and regulatory framework to oversee the use of psilocybin, includes legislative findings and detailed statements of goals that indicate the intent to serve populations such as the terminally ill. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit say that the existing rules, which mandate only service at authorized centers, directly contradict that goal.

The plaintiffs are seeking a court order to require OHA to develop a process for domestic service as a reasonable accommodation, and to notify all licensed facilitators that such accommodations are permitted without fear of disciplinary action.

The ongoing litigation highlights the tension between the state’s innovative regulatory framework and the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, which requires public entities to provide reasonable accommodations to ensure services are accessible to people with disabilities. A previous ruling denying OHA’s motion to dismiss suggested that requiring compliance with the ADA—such as access accommodations—would not necessarily compel the state to violate federal law against the distribution of a Schedule I controlled substance.

However, OHA says that current state law, as written, does not provide a legal means to consume psilocybin outside of a licensed service center, and that accommodating home use would violate the statute. This attitude leaves facilitators who want to serve domestic clients in a precarious situation, at risk of losing their licenses or worse if they provide services outside of regulated centers.

Oregon Health Authority officials did not immediately respond The filterrequests for comments.

Meanwhile, the Psilocybin Services Act was intended to help prevent access to a key population in Oregon. The plaintiffs say the delay in providing accessible services has had far-reaching consequences, especially for terminally ill patients who have limited time to potentially transform the rest of their lives.

If the federal court once again denies OHA’s motion to dismiss the case, it will move closer to deciding whether the state must make accommodations for those clients to perform psilocybin services at home. The result could significantly expand access to the state’s pioneering psilocybin program. It may also affect how other states design their programs.

“We hope the Court will decline to avoid merits review, move the case forward, and ensure access to disabled and dying Oregonians, who are among those most likely to benefit from psilocybin services,” Tucker concluded.

This the article Originally published by the author The filteran online magazine that deals with drug use, drug policy and human rights from a harm reduction perspective. Keep the filter on Bluesky, X or Facebookand sign up for their newsletter.

user photo Wikimedia/Staff.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Local startup expands to 32,000-square-foot cannabis processing facility

Published

on

By











Founded in 2018 by six Greek graduates as a CBD company, NOWAVE’s products can be found in 90 percent of New York state’s legal cannabis dispensaries.

“We started with a 300-square-foot space behind a retail store — actually a vape shop,” recalls founder Brian Lane. “((We) started perfecting our gummies, sending them out to vape shops all over the country. The next thing you know, we found ourselves making quite a few gummies. We were self-taught in all of our product types, and now we’ve grown from that 300 square foot space to where we are right now.”

Approximately 100 people work at the Chili facility, producing hemp and CBD products and processing cannabis into edibles, vaping products, and even carbonated beverages containing THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana.

NOWAVE manufactures products for brands including Off Hours, Eaton Botanicals and Weed Water. The company also makes some of the only vegan gummies on the market.

Read more at 13 Yes










Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media