Connect with us

Cannabis News

The Clash of Cannabis Advocates

Published

on


marijuana moms vs daddy downer

Few appreciate that both enacting and ultimately dismantling alcohol Prohibition pivoted on organized motherly outrage. 1920’s dry crusaders like the Women’s Christian Temperance Union pushed banning brews as protecting families. But the Great Depression’s violence and despair stirred maternal calls to regain reason.

 

Pauline Sabin, a Republican aristocrat and founder of the Women’s Organization for National Prohibition Reform, led rallies of 10,000 fed-up women demanding change. “In pre-prohibition days, mothers had little fear in allowing their children to go to ice cream parlors or soda fountains, places where soft drinks were served,” she wrote Congress.

 

But now children easily accessed hard liquors like bathtub gin in Speakeasies amidst booming gangsterism and corruption. Lawlessness became the greater threat to American households.

 

Sabin’s movement eroded dry political dominance by appealing to parents pragmatic about human desire. Their pressure ushered FDR ending federal Prohibition in 1933. But state bans persisted until 1966 when another women’s group lobbied Michigan’s legislature incisively.

 

“We learned our lesson that coercively banning human vices only worsens outcomes and surrendering reasonable oversight makes things potentially more dangerous, not less,” they effectively argued. Lawmakers concurred.

 

The rest is history – Michigan initiated regulating alcohol sensibly, other states followed embracing regulation over fantasy prohibition. And the model endures today thanks to mom-driven common sense balancing moral realism with compassion.

 

Now in Illinois, echoes of this timeless tension reverberate over cannabis. Ironically, the protagonists still seem familiar – outraged mothers seeking freedom versus heavy-handed authorities pushing eliminationism ideology over pragmatism.

 

When will we ever learn? Let’s explore this latest skirmish to uncover enduring truths…

 

 

In Illinois, a coalition of female legislators and activists who spearheaded legalizing recreational cannabis now face public attacks by a district attorney irrationally blaming the plant for fueling violent crimes and mental health crises.

 

These influential “Marijuana Moms” helped pass the state’s pioneering 2019 adult-use bill after years building public and political momentum. The law mandated strict safety regulations while allowing access for consenting adult use and expanding medical access.

 

By multiple measures, the policy’s outcomes proved positive – hundreds of millions in new tax revenue improved marginalized communities and funded social programs while youth use declined despite the fearmongering predictions of prohibitionists.

 

Overall the rollout demonstrated Colorado-style legalization working as intended when blending individual liberty for adults with pragmatic oversight ensuring public wellbeing. Leaders termed it “Equity Focused and Responsibly Regulated”.

 

But one holdout continues invoking hysterical ‘Reefer Madness’ talking points demonizing cannabis. McHenry County’s State Attorney Patrick Kenneally bizarrely blames legalization for recent homicides, substance abuse, and suicide with no substantive evidence.

 

Kenneally forced county dispensaries to post factually dubious warnings about cannabis psychosis leading to depression and violence absent scientific consensus. He admonished medical efficacy as “elaborate quackery” directly contradicting current federal analysis. And he dismissed $500 million in social reinvestment funds as “soft corruption”.

 

In response, the Marijuana Moms penned an open letter chiding this retrograde rhetoric as reviving Anslinger’s 1930’s propaganda. They cited updated research confirming unique therapeutic benefits and moderate dependence risks relative to alternatives like alcohol or pharmaceuticals.

 

Kenneally’s rebuttal then attacked them personally as industry shills, further politicizing legitimate science. He failed addressing mammoth gaps in logic causally linking regulated access with complex systemic societal issues.

 

Essentially the exchange crystallizes enduring tensions around cannabis legalization – a flawed criminalization paradigm clinging to power versus pragmatic calls for health-centered reform. One side leans on fear and control, the other public education and freedom.

 

While broader cultural preferences trend clearly away from prohibitionist strong-arming, some pockets of stubborn resistance remain fighting the inevitable rather than focusing efforts more constructively on transitioning to legalization’s realities. Continued false propaganda only postpones progress.

 

But eventually truth prevails, and the Marijuana Moms stand firmly on the right side of science and history in this pivotal struggle. When even usually law-and-order Chicago Tribune concedes regulation’s sensibility, the once formidable prohibition fortress groans under its own contradictions.

 

The future lies not in reflexive blame and doubled-down denial but acknowledging complex nuance and shepherding necessary change with care, courage and community. Mothers know such wisdom well instinctively – may we follow their lead once more against tired tyrannies.

 

A key irony of prohibitionists invoking science exists in their glaringly anti-scientific worldview. Banning research and open inquiry contradicts academia’s core tenets. Yet the drug war embargoed whole realms of study, stymying knowledge of unique remedies emerging from nature’s pharmacy.

 

The imperial DEA still prohibits exploring profound healing modalities like psychedelic psychotherapy despite overwhelming evidence of breakthroughs treating depression, addiction and PTSD. Their denialism ignores reams of trials abroad that regulators call “transformational”.

 

So while prohibitionists eagerly cite isolated cannabis studies suggesting some societal harm, they ignore opposing findings on unique benefits or mountains of data showing wider damage from alcohol and pharmaceuticals. Selectivity belies objectivity.

 

Equally, they dismiss logical extrapolations about how legal access allows balancing rights, risks and safeguards instead of forfeiting control to chaotic black markets ruled by poverty and violence. Reason gets sacrificed to maintain Manichean simplicity – all illegal drugs wholly evil, total abstinence wholly virtuous.

 

Of course, this worldview requires ignoring history itself as well – for instance, God’s own failed prohibition efforts in Eden’s garden intended preventing suffering, not realizing alternatives exceeded imagining. Sometimes insight arises by encountering deepest shadows firsthand.

 

So not even divine foreknowledge accomplishes modifying free will for “the greater good” without breeding other dysfunction. By definition, coercion cannot dictate consciousness or conscience. Yet this never stops earthly impulses toward commandments and body sovereignty violations “for your own benefit”.

 

But the sticky truth remains, as Eden and the disastrous drug war both demonstrate – prohibition contradicts soul growth by inhibiting self-discovery and personal responsibility. Banning choices only inflates their appeal through forbidden mystique, especially among youth.

 

The endeavor itself seems doomed, forcing disingenuous rhetoric rationalizing oppression. Hence we suffer absurd alchemy transmuting therapeutic plant synergies into violent scourges while transforming literal poisons like alcohol and tobacco into permitted pleasures. Madness.

 

Prohibition warps reason itself around sustaining irrational policies ultimately fueling the problems they aim stopping. It represents human law’s intrinsic limits rather than any moral revelation. The flowers bloom in their season regardless, awaiting our awakening.

 

In the end, bloviating arguments invoking fear prove no match for personal testimony or common sense. And the masses tire of sophistry aimed limiting adults’ sovereignty over their minds and bodies.

 

 

Once more we witness aggrieved mothers banding together, lending their immense heart power towards transforming unjust systems laid bare. And when galvanized thusly, no force proves mightier reshaping society and policy.

 

For the intrinsic wisdom intertwined with shepherding new life through constant nurturing sacrifice makes the maternal perspective uniquely disruption-proof. Having created worlds gives vision beyond fear-based control. Death holds no sway over life’s guardian angels.

 

Hence almost no group shifts cultural tides as impactfully as fed-up moms, forcing the hand of hardened institutions. And now the Marijuana Moms invoke this eternal font, wielding its nonviolent influence against tired tyrannies on humanity’s behalf.

 

In many ways still fighting the same battles against the same forces as their iron-willed temperance ancestors. But with more savvy around actual outcomes beyond ideals when regulating adult behaviors with wide appeals. They understand good intentions proving hell’s pavement.

 

And so these mothers push us closer toward redemption and resurrection of ethics – returning healing plants unjustly demonized and restoring reason in place of profitable propaganda thriving through decades of Reefer Madness falsehoods.

 

They appeal to our sensibilities with truth and heart, not pedestals of hypocritical moral superiority leveraged forcibly against dissent. For coercion reveals philosophical failure before different choices emerge.

 

In response the lingering dinosaurs retreat into personal attacks and cynical bleating about “Big Cannabis” rather than addressing crises of credibility birthed from broken systems crumbling. It is easier making enemies than making change.

 

The plants spring eternal, the work of freedom ongoing. But when mothers unite behind a cause, preamble to power’s surrender comes quickly. The milk of human kindness flows on the wings of women wedding compassion to conscience.

 

May we join then today in celebration of these intrepid Marijuana Moms moving mountains through spoken truths our institutions and laws cannot withstand. For the greatest monuments still construct through vision and values – like families, like communities – not courts and coats of arms. And love always conquers above might.

 

Let mothers lead us then into healed tomorrows where freedom rings from sea to shining sea, fear dims to curiosity’s bright dawn. The doors of perception open, the obstacles of old fear stories dissolving like mirages no longer useful. Just milk and honey remain ahead.

 

Hark now, victory awaits heralded by merry matriarchal laughter…

 

MARIJUANA MOMS, A NATIONAL FORCE, READ ON…

MARIJUANA MOM DEANA MARTIN TELLS HER SIDE

MARIJUANA MOM SENTENCES TO 4 YEARS TELLS HER STORY LIVE!



Source link

Cannabis News

Maintaining The Highest Level of Quality and Freshness for THCa Products

Published

on

By


 

thca products

When looking for food, the freshness and quality of the product are essential to the customer. Care must be taken with every product to keep its original qualities. This makes sure that customers have the best experience possible with every buy. Brands ensure their products stay potent and fresh, so to maintain they put them in airtight containers. This gives customers a premium experience that stands out in the market even if they are bought from thca flower clearance. This is especially important when it comes to cannabis goods. Keeping THC-rich flowers fresh ensures every person has a good experience that meets their needs.

The practice of storing things in air-tight containers is very helpful for maintaining their quality. These containers help keep out air, light, and wetness, which can all make the product fresh and effective over time. For people who use cannabis, how fresh the product is can have a big effect on how strong and how long the benefits last. When THC flowers are stored properly, users can expect a better experience that keeps all of the product’s benefits.

The chemicals that give weed its unique tastes and smells, don’t break down when it is stored in an airtight container. Terpenes are very important for improving the taste and making each type unique. The natural qualities of these terpenes can be kept safe by storing them in the right way. This way, every user can enjoy the full range of tastes and smells that the product has to offer.

Why airtight containers are important

Containers that don’t let air in are not only useful, they are necessary for storing things. Over the time, oxygen can break down the product’s cannabinoids and oils. When you use airtight cases, the product stays protected from the outside world. This keeps its chemical structure and makes sure it stays strong.

The users will trust the products only if they feel good about quality. Whether they are used for fun or medical reasons, THC flowers if not stored correctly may have less effect, giving a bad experience for users. To keep the level of quality, it is important to spend money on good storage methods like using airtight containers.

Make sure you have a great time

When a product has been carefully stored in the best possible ways, the experience is more powerful. Whether you are buying flowers to help you feel better or just for fun, they should always be live. With this care, users can get a product that works well like they bought the day it was packaged.

Freshness is at the heart of this process. By making sure that goods are kept in containers that keep air out, businesses can keep up the quality of the goods and make sure that customers can get the best items. Customers are happier and more likely to trust the brand to always provide better goods.

In the end, keeping the product fresh and high-quality isn’t just about keeping it safe, it is also about giving the customer a regular, good experience. Making sure that a product stays fresh and effective from the time it is packed until it gets to the customer is very important. One easy and very effective way to reach this goal is to store things in containers that keep air out. Looking at good storage methods will continue to be important for keeping the quality of THC products even as the cannabis business grows. Customers can be sure that this way of keeping things fresh and effective will make their experience better, whether they are looking for new types or taking advantage of thca flower clearance deals.



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Cannabis Code Enforcement Fines Must be Remedial, Not Punitive, Federal Court of Appeal Holds

Published

on

By


The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal has reinstated a civil rights lawsuit against Humboldt County, California, that challenges the county’s practices in imposing punitive daily fines. It is the first time a federal appellate court has weighed in on local government’s enforcement of code violations involving cannabis farms.

The Court of Appeal decision

The decision, in Thomas v. County of Humboldt, comes after years of complaints by cannabis cultivators that local governments impose unfair fines for technical violations at licensed farms. That counties and municipalities have adopted and are enforcing large fines involving licensed properties is one of many reasons why increasing numbers of farms have given up their licenses and shut down completely or returned to the illicit market. This is hurting state efforts to bolster the legal market and suppress the illicit market for cannabis.

Lessons for industry and regulators

A takeaway from the decision is that local governments need to keep the goal of remediation in mind in establishing penalties, must be more reasonable in allowing cultivators to fix violations, and more flexible in decisions to impose fines and settling disputes. The decision should motivate county and city attorneys, and cannabis licensees and applicants, seek assistance from a mediator with expertise in the cannabis market and regulation. The courthouse might not now be as friendly a venue for local government as it has been in the past.

Most cannabis businesses that run afoul of local codes pay the penalties, no matter how unfair they might seem, because they can’t afford a long legal battle and the administrative and court processes are tilted against the property owner. Administrative hearing officers routinely uphold notices of violations and the penalties imposed by code enforcement officers. Writs of mandate brought against local government in state court, particularly in smaller counties, are extremely difficult to win.

Background on the Thomas case

What has made the Thomas case viable is that several plaintiffs banded together in a civil rights class action in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Humboldt County’s penalties for cannabis abatement violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause.

Humboldt County established a schedule of daily fines for illegal cannabis cultivation of up to $10,000, with a minimum of $6,000. Upon receiving a notice of violation from the county, the party has 10 days to abate all violations, subject to an appeals process, during which penalties continue to accrue. Violations included not just the illegal cultivation of cannabis itself, but also any other violation that facilitates illegal cultivation of cannabis. The Thomas plaintiffs contended that the county issues violation notices with hefty fines based on imprecise data (such as satellite and drone photos) and for code violations that originated with previous property owners.

The lower District Court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the plaintiffs lack legal standing, because they had not, at the time of suit, paid any penalties. But the Ninth Circuit held that the plaintiffs had concrete injuries, providing standing, because they suffered emotional distress and had incurred expenses with engineers and attorneys as they attempted to abate the alleged violations and defended themselves in hearings.

Getting to the merits of the lawsuit, the Ninth Circuit held that the plaintiffs had plausible claims under the Excessive Fines Clause because the penalties were punitive, not remedial. The Ninth Circuit agreed with the plaintiffs that the fines were unconstitutionally excessive because (1) the notices were vague, often inaccurate, or involved violations that pre-dated the plaintiffs’ occupation of their properties; (2) lesser penalties could accomplish the same health and safety goals; and (3) the alleged offenses caused no harm beyond a technical lack of compliance with the county’s permitting regulations.

Humboldt provides for an administrative appeal before a hearing officer who determines whether a violation has occurred or continues to exist. The hearing officer can only reduce the penalty for a violation in limited circumstances and cannot reduce it to less than $6,000 per day. Although the Ninth Circuit did not explicitly address it in the Thomas decision, a property owner in most circumstances also can be forced to pay the county or municipality’s abatement costs and legal expenses — including those incurred in a subsequent writ of mandate proceeding in state court. The Ninth Circuit agreed that the Thomas plaintiffs had come under:

“immense pressure to settle due to the County’s issuance of ruinous fines, . . . its undue delay in providing hearings, its denial of permits while abatements are pending, and the cost the County imposes to prove one’s innocence.”

The Ninth Circuit found that Humboldt County’s fines were “clearly punitive, not remedial as argued by the County.” The fines could reach millions of dollars, and, in the case of one plaintiff, the fines dwarfed the value of her property. The appellate court was untroubled by the involvement of cannabis, which remains unlawful under the federal Controlled Substances Act:

“[I]t seems clear to us that lesser penalties could accomplish the same health and safety goals,” and “the offenses here have caused no harm beyond a technical lack of compliance with the County’s cannabis permitting regulations.”

The Thomas plaintiffs’ strategy pays off

The Thomas plaintiffs’ strategy of going to federal court was fraught, because the court could have just as easily declined to hear the matter under the illegality doctrine, but it paid off here; the Ninth Circuit not only considered the case but also disregarded the problem of whether the plaintiffs were entitled to any remedy under federal law.

The Ninth Circuit concluded by acknowledging that local government is “often at the forefront of addressing difficult and complex issues,” but it should use “flexibility” in decision making and “cannot overstep its authority and impose fines on its citizens without paying heed to the limits posed by the Eighth Amendment.”

Note: This post was first published January 6, 2025 on the Alger ADR Blog



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Are Americans Shifting to Cannabis and Saying Goodbye to Cigarettes for Good?

Published

on

By


no more cigarettes

Are Americans Shifting To Weed And Saying Goodbye To Cigarettes?

 

We live in a time when people are more health-conscious than ever.

 

For the first time in history, we’re seeing a downward trend in the consumption of cigarettes, especially among young adults and adolescents. Just a few decades ago, cigarettes were considered ‘cool’. The link between cancer and cigarettes were established by the 1950’s, though accepting that cigarette smoking was “bad” for you didn’t take root socially until around the late 1990’s.  

 

Now, we know that cigarette smoking is a dangerous, often fatal habit that leads to cancer, respiratory illnesses, and heart disease. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), over 8 million people die prematurely from tobacco use yearly.

 

In the results of a Gallup poll from early 2024, they found that more Americans are more likely to smoke weed than cigarettes, while young people are more than 5 times more likely to choose weed over tobacco. The poll found that 17% of Americans smoke weed, while 12% admitted to smoking cigarettes in the previous week. The more dramatic difference was observed among the 18-34 age range, where 26% admitted to consuming weed while only 5% of them still smoke cigarettes.

 

For the same poll, they also found that the older adults aged 55 and up were more likely to still smoke cigarettes compared to marijuana. “Americans’ reported marijuana smoking has more than doubled since 2013, when Gallup first added the question in its annual Consumption Habits survey,” explained Gallup. “That year, seven percent said they did,” they reported.

 

Improved Public Perceptions Leads To Healthier Choices

 

One can’t deny that there has been a massive shift in the increasing awareness of marijuana’s health benefits, as well as the dangers of cigarette smoking. This leads to changing public perceptions, better and more scientific research as well as clinical studies, and an improvement in the law.


The law, specifically, has been instrumental in mitigating the spread of cigarette use. For example, many governments worldwide have established strict no-smoking policies and placed a massive tax on cigarettes. Tobacco manufacturers are no longer allowed to freely advertise their product. All these have led to a downward trend in cigarette smoking habits and purchasing.

 

The proliferation of legal cannabis throughout North America, not just for medical use but also for recreational use has also contributed to a widespread cultural acceptance of cannabis, which has also improved the public perception of the drug. As we speak, it’s already become a part of society not just in North America but also in countries such as Thailand, several European nations, Uruguay, and Mexico to name a few.

 

In addition, people are also becoming more educated about the use of alcohol. While it may still be the most widely used intoxicant, its days me be numbered: there is a small yet growing number of people who are choosing to replace alcohol with weed, because of the sheer number of studies proving the dangerous link between fatal illnesses and alcohol. Not to mention that alcohol is linked to drunk driving and road fatalities, multiple different types of cancers, horrible hangovers, and so much more.

 

Even Gallup polls from as far back as 2022 revealed that people in the United States have already begun to smoke more weed than cigarettes. Gallup conducted the survey from July 5 through 26 of 2022. The results reveal that 11% of the population smoke cigarettes, while back in the mid-1950’s, 45% of Americans smoked them. Meanwhile, 16% of Americans reported that they smoke weed, and 48% tried it in the past. Back in 1969, just 4% of Americans smoked weed!

 

It’s clear that societal and cultural perceptions around both have changed dramatically. “Smoking cigarettes is on the decline and is most likely to become even more of a rarity in the years ahead,” explains Gallup Senior Scientist Dr. Frank Newport. “This reflects both public awareness of its negative effects and continuing government efforts at all levels to curtail its use,” he said.

 

Unfortunately, the Gallup poll also found that alcohol remains a popular substance for Americans. Despite the increasing studies being published right now that alcohol is a proven carcinogen, one can’t blame the population: it’s legal, easily accessible, and affordable for many.

 

Overall, it seems that the demand for wellness is slowly taking over. Wellness is no longer just a buzzword or a trend; it’s a real pursuit that more, especially young people, are seeking. And cannabis fits very well into that picture: whether CBD or THC, the components of marijuana have proven beneficial for the mental and physical health of people, across a wide age group. From pediatric CBD applications to therapeutic uses for the elderly, cannabis can be beneficial for many people.

It’s so easy to see why thousands of young adults commonly include cannabis as part of their everyday wellness regimen – the same generation that have shunned cigarette smoking for good.

 

Conclusion

 

If you really must have a smoking habit, choose weed over cigarettes. Even then, any type of weed is much healthier than tobacco. Marijuana is so much healthier for your mind and body, and it can function as a medicine and supplement as well.

 

For individuals who are struggling to quit smoking cigarettes, you might even want to consider using cannabis as a cessation aid. Many have found success using cannabis to quit cigarettes, with longer-lasting success rates.

 

CAN CANNABIS HELP YOU QUIT CIGARETTES? READ BELOW…

CAN WEED HELP YOU QUIT CIGARETTES

CAN WEED HELP YOU QUIT CIGARETTES? WE ASKED THE PROS!



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media