Connect with us

Cannabis News

The Dark Side of Legalization vs. the Dark Side of Prohibition

Published

on


cost benefits cannabis

Dark side Vs Darkside – An in depth Risk/Benefit Analysis

 

Pitting the “Dark Side” of Legalization vs the “Dark Side” of Prohibition

 

As I got ready to do my research for my next batch of articles, I stumbled upon a cannabis opinion that spoke about the “dark side of legalization”. According to the author, the experimentation of legalization has failed on all fronts and argued that despite the general support for cannabis legalization – it’s a bad idea.

 

As one would expect, there has been a lot of pushback on this article trying to disprove some of the wild claims in the article.

 

In fact, I’m going to use it and compare it to the “Dark side” of prohibition. While the author might think that he’s “check mated” everyone, I’m going to show him that even if cannabis isn’t living up to the expectations – it’s infinitely better than the prohibition alternative.

 

This article is going to be a masterclass in dismantling Prohibitionist rhetoric and a staunch reminded that “prohibition= death” – in the hundreds of thousands.

 

As always, I’ll be quoting the Times Article and responding to each claim.

 

Here we go!

 

 

Of all the ways to win a culture war, the smoothest is to just make the other side seem hopelessly uncool. So it’s been with the march of marijuana legalization: There have been moral arguments about the excesses of the drug war and medical arguments about the potential benefits of pot, but the vibe of the whole debate has pitted the chill against the uptight, the cool against the square, the relaxed future against the Principal Skinners of the past. – Ross Douthat

 

While it’s true the uptightness of prohibitionists is evident – the debate surrounding cannabis legalization has never been about “cool vs uncool”. I’ve been writing on cannabis culture, events, etc for over 15-years and throughout this time have I never used this rhetoric to win arguments.

 

While Douthat wants to pit prohibitionists as just “old timey folk” who simply aren’t “cool enough” to understand legalization – the truth of the matter is that if you’re going to want to be a prohibitionist, you can’t just eat around the fecal matter in the middle of the “shit sandwich” that is prohibition.

 

It’s not about cool or uncool, it’s always been about power, control, human rights, and human health. It’s about policies that take non-crimes and turn them into crimes. It’s about police resources being wasted on prosecuting non-violent crimes. It’s about wasting taxpayer money. It’s about bodily autonomy.

 

“Cool” and “Uncool” is at the bottom of a very long list of other actually legitimate things that Douthat simply doesn’t want to look at – so while he is presenting his Darkside, I’ll present my own version of it – but reflecting the Darkside of prohibition.

 

But Lehman explains in detail why the second-order effects of marijuana legalization have mostly vindicated the pessimists and skeptics. First, on the criminal justice front, the expectation that legalizing pot would help reduce America’s prison population by clearing out nonviolent offenders was always overdrawn, since marijuana convictions made up a small share of the incarceration rate even at its height. But Lehman argues that there is also no good evidence so far that legalization reduces racially discriminatory patterns of policing and arrests. In his view, cops often use marijuana as a pretext to search someone they suspect of a more serious crime, and they simply substitute some other pretext when the law changes, leaving arrest rates basically unchanged.

 

In this section, Douthat simply echoes the sentiments of another “libertarian turned prohibitionist”. In this case, he argues that “legalizing would help reduce the prison population” and while there is a case for this – the impact of legalization would be better judged in “arrest rates”.

 

Many people who get busted for pot – especially these days – get cited for misdemeanors because there is already a great “decriminalization effect” in many places. Very few places will actually send you to prison for an ounce.

 

However, “arrests” and similar actions are far more common. In fact, cannabis was a “carte blanche” for law enforcement to arrest or search anyone they like. It would be a weapon in their hands to get people to cooperate, and it was used by Nixon to silence war protestors.

 

Cannabis was never meant to be on the Control Substance Act, according to Nixon’s own commission and, by the admission of one of his staffers – was purely motivated by political reasons to disrupt anti war protests.

 

Now, let’s start talking economics. How much does a marijuan arrest (NOT Imprisonment) cost the US tax payer?

 

The ACLU claims that every weed arrest costs the American taxpayer $750, and states spend more than $500 million per annum to arrest people for cannabis possession.

 

More importantly, every arrest occupies the time of a law enforcement officer. It jams up the criminal justice system and reduces law enforcement’s ability to focus on actual crimes.

 

This has always been the core argument for cannabis legalization. Federally speaking, “simple possession” is almost never present but most people get charged with “intent to distribute”. This is a key difference.

 

When it comes to quantity it matters because you get charged for different crimes. If you have a pound, you’ll not get charged as a person who consumes a lot of weed – you’ll be charged as a dealer.

 

To overlook this fact within the argument of arrests/imprisonment is negligible. Which is why the argument that legalization had zero impact on incarceration rates is false.

 

The Dark Side of prohibition shows us that by keeping cannabis illegal, you give the police unprecedented power to seize your property and your person based on a non-lethal, non-violent act and can increase your jail time based on quantity.

REEFER MADNESS WASHINGTON EXAMINER

 

So legalization isn’t necessarily striking a great blow against mass incarceration or for racial justice. Nor is it doing great things for public health. There was hope, and some early evidence, that legal pot might substitute for opioid use, but some of the more recent data cuts the other way: A new paper published in The Journal of Health Economics found that “legal medical marijuana, particularly when available through retail dispensaries, is associated with higher opioid mortality.” There are therapeutic benefits to cannabis that justify its availability for prescription, but the evidence of its risks keeps increasing: This month brought a new paper strengthening the link between heavy pot use and the onset of schizophrenia in young men.

 

Firstly, when checking out study he cited claiming that marijuana had a higher opioid mortality within the abstract they have this sentence, “A likely mechanism for these effects is the emergence of illicit fentanyl…”

 

Meaning that, “illegally produced fentanyl” is likely to blame for the increased deaths. Furthermore, medical cannabis legalization and cannabis legalization in general has shown to decrease the use of opioids.

 

A recent study published in The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that patients having access to medical marijuana for a longer duration led to a decrease in prescription opioid use for chronic pain. Other studies have also linked legalization of medical marijuana to a decrease in opioid prescriptions. In states that have legalized medical marijuana, opioid prescriptions decreased by 2.11 million daily doses a year, which increased to 3.7 million when dispensaries opened up. Another study by the University of Kentucky found that states that had legalized medical marijuana saw a 5.9% drop in opioid prescriptions.

 

With a reduction of daily doses between 2.11 – 3.7 million post legalization, this indicates that there is a net positive in terms of public health. To claim otherwise is simply lazy.

 

When it comes to the “Darkside” of prohibition – people are forced to obtain unregulated product or choose a pharmaceutical option. Most cannabis patients opted out of pharmaceuticals due to the negative side effects.

 

But of course, Douthat could give two shits about those who suffer. For him “the smell” is annoying or “some people with mental health disorders could be at risk”. But how many more people are there with chronic illness, with PTSD, with anxiety disorders, with eating disorders – that utilize cannabis safely to treat their symptoms.

 

Do they not matter? Do we only talk about the adverse effects and ignore all the positives?

 

And the broad downside risks of marijuana, beyond extreme dangers like schizophrenia, remain as evident as ever: a form of personal degradation, of lost attention and performance and motivation, that isn’t mortally dangerous in the way of heroin but that can damage or derail an awful lot of human lives. Most casual pot smokers won’t have this experience, but the legalization era has seen a sharp increase in the number of noncasual users. Occasional use has risen substantially since 2008, but daily or near-daily use is up much more, with around 1‌‌6 million Americans, out of ‌more than 50 million users, now suffering from what ‌‌is termed marijuana use disorder.

 

“Personal degradation?” I know countless long term cannabis users who have no “personal degradation”. They are focused, disciplined, and high achievers. As you can note, this is pure prohibitionist rhetoric – attacking the character of a “stereotype” while ignoring the performance of the individual.

While the vast majority of the daily users aren’t “problematic” in their behavioral assessments according to the DSM-V – marijuana use disorder is incredibly subjective. Most people also tend to modulate their consumption over the years.

 

Yet, these behavioral norms are often ignored to support particular narratives. Furthermore, alcohol also has the “potential to derail”, so under Douthat’s reasoning we should outlaw this as well?

 

Video games? Social Media? Sports? Sex? All of these things has the potential to become problematic and if that is the metric to prohibit them – life is going to get boring quite quickly.

 

 

In practice, it hasn’t worked that way. Because of all the years of prohibition, a mature and supple illegal marketplace already exists, ready to undercut whatever prices the legal market charges. So to make the legal marketplace successful and amenable to regulation, you would probably need much more enforcement against the illegal marketplace — which is difficult and expensive and, again, obviously uncool, in conflict with the good-vibrations spirit of the legalizers.

 

While this is somewhat true, the reasons why the black market continues to thrive are two fold. Partial legalization coupled with over-regulation. You can’t simply legalize cannabis and tax the hell out of it to compete with the black market.

 

I have written on this extensively and proposed a 2-Tier system which would effectively make the “public tier” compete with the black market and have the “private tier” be reserved for national/international commerce which would require heavier regulation.

 

You can read about that here.

 

While Douthat argues that you would need more regulation, the truth of the matter is that you need to decentralize cannabis production in such a way that the black market cannot compete  with the public market, and the private sector aims at providing avenues of mass distribution.

 

I expect legalization to advance much further before either of these alternatives builds significant support. But eventually the culture will recognize that under the banner of personal choice, we’re running a general experiment in exploitation — addicting our more vulnerable neighbors to myriad pleasant-seeming vices, handing our children over to the social media dopamine machine and spreading degradation wherever casinos spring up and weed shops flourish.

 

With that realization, and only with that realization, will the squares get the hearing they deserve.

 

Once again, we’re seeing the word “degradation” being used. An assumption that the majority of cannabis users are “suffering” or “stupid”. Even within Douthat’s own words – the majority of users won’t suffer these consequences.

 

Yet, because a minority “could be affected” – he would rather opt in for harsher policies that strip the individual from their own faculties. They no longer become “owners of their own bodies” but rather need to follow the rules set forth by others.

 

The word you’re looking for is “slavery”. I wrote about that here.

 

I don’t know what Douthat’s views on life is, but by reading his other material one could assume that he’s in favor of “women’s right to choose”. You know, abortion rights and all that jazz.

 

Yet, women only have rights when it comes to abortion. If a woman chooses to smoke weed or do any other drug – Douthat would much rather see her in jail as with anyone else.

 

For someone who speaks of “wokeness” – it seems to me that he is in fact more aligned with his “conservative counterparts” than he claims to be.

 

Society isn’t exploiting anyone. Certain corporations are. Social Media, games, alcohol, entertainment…hell, the very publication that he writes for utilizes their clout to sway political opinion. Running Op Eds that favor a particular political ideology.

 

The point is, there is a disconnect between these alleged “progressives” that talk about equity and rights, but then want Uncle Sam to violently rape the rights and liberties of those who don’t align with their own internalized view of the world.

 

Does cannabis legalization come with flaws? Yes! The way we are legalizing it is not the best. I wrote about the answer, and it’s far simpler than one would think.

 

The problem is “how” it’s being done and understanding that government is interested in money over the rights of people – is why the problems of the black market persist.

 

The fact of the matter is that there is a whole aspect of prohibition Douthat ignores which is the countless dead bodies that results from drug prohibition. You see, all the drugs being produced by illegal cartels and sold under prohibition makes them problematic.

 

In Mexico, during 2006-2011, there were hundreds of thousands of dead bodies as a result of the drug war. In the 1980s, Colombia saw tens of thousands of dead bodies as a result of prohibition.

 

HSBC and many other major banks were caught  laundering money for cartels.Dirty drugs were sold for profits, people were ODing and left  to die due to punitive drug laws. The police stole billions of dollars without convicting anyone for a crime – and the list goes on.

 

Prohibition is far more sinister than legalization. In every metric, for every argument…legalization simply is the better option. If you’re worried about the negatives, work on creating policies of education – invest in empowering people, instead of trying to limit their freedom through draconian “right leaning” laws that was literally founded on deception and racism…but hey Douthat the “progressive liberal” seems to be totally okay with that.

 

HEALTH BENEFITS AND SAVING LIVES, READ ON…

SAVING LIVES WITH LEGALIZATION

47,000 LIVES A YEAR SAVED WITH CANNABIS LEGALIZATION?



Source link

Cannabis News

How Do You Tell Your Kids You Smoked Weed at Their Age, But They Should Not?

Published

on

By


talking to your kids about your weed use

Modern Parenting: Talking to your kids about weed…our use not theirs!

Remember that uncomfortable moment when your parents caught you smoking weed? That dreaded “Talk” that followed – where you sat squirming in your chair while they cycled through concern, disappointment, and those well-worn warnings about the dangers of marijuana. Even though you knew they meant well, it felt like an eternity of awkward silence punctuated by cautionary tales and stern looks.

For those of us who came of age in the 80s, 90s, and early 2000s, this was practically a rite of passage. Getting busted, enduring The Talk, making promises to “never do it again” (fingers firmly crossed behind our backs), and eventually being grounded or punished in some creative way. While our parents were right about waiting until our brains fully developed before experimenting with cannabis, the whole experience was about as pleasant as a bad case of cottonmouth.

But times, they are a-changin’. These days, many of those same kids who got The Talk are now parents themselves – and quite a few of them enjoy cannabis responsibly as adults. This creates an interesting role reversal. Instead of lecturing kids about their weed use, modern parents face the challenge of explaining their own cannabis consumption to their children.

How do you have that conversation? When is the right time? What do you say to a curious 5-year-old who spots your vape pen? How do you address a teenager’s pointed questions about your “hypocritical” stance on underage use?

Today, we’re going to tackle these thorny questions head-on, providing modern parents with age-appropriate strategies for discussing their cannabis use with their kids. Because in 2025, The Talk isn’t just about warning kids away from weed – it’s about modeling responsible adult consumption in an era of increasing acceptance and legalization.

Let’s dive into how to navigate these conversations at different stages of your child’s development.

When it comes to discussing cannabis use with your kids, we can essentially break it down into two major developmental stages. Sure, we could slice and dice age groups into smaller segments, but we’d just end up rehashing variations of the same conversation. For simplicity’s sake, let’s focus on “Pre-Teen” (ages 3-12) and “Teen” (13-19), though you’ll need to adjust these guidelines based on your child’s individual development.

During those early years, less is definitely more. Your five-year-old doesn’t need a detailed explanation of the endocannabinoid system or terpene profiles. A simple “It’s Mommy’s medicine” or “It helps Daddy’s back pain” usually suffices. Kids this age are generally satisfied with straightforward, matter-of-fact explanations that fit within their understanding of the world.

However – and this is crucial – don’t fool yourself into thinking they’re not paying attention. Kids are like tiny surveillance cameras with unlimited storage capacity. They notice everything, even when you think they’re absorbed in their LEGOs or favorite cartoon.

I’ll never forget a scene I witnessed in San Pancho, a laid-back surf town in Mexico. At some local’s gathering, I watched in amazement as toddlers perfectly mimicked their cannabis-consuming parents – right down to the characteristic head bob, half-lidded eyes, and that unmistakable “stoned” expression. They weren’t judging; they were just doing what kids do best: observing and imitating.

This brings me to the most critical point about handling cannabis use during your children’s early years: it’s less about what you say and more about how you behave. Your actions will shape their perceptions far more than any explanation you provide.

If you can consume cannabis while maintaining your role as a responsible, present, and reliable parent – if you’re still helping with homework, making dinner, playing games, and being their rock of stability – then you’re sending the right message. Kids don’t need you to be perfect, but they do need you to be consistent and dependable.

The goal isn’t to hide your cannabis use but to demonstrate that it doesn’t fundamentally change who you are or your ability to be their parent. If you can maintain your composure, fulfill your responsibilities, and avoid turning into a stereotype (looking at you, couch-locked snack attackers), your kids are likely to view cannabis as just another aspect of adult life – no more dramatic or concerning than having a glass of wine with dinner.

This approach, combined with age-appropriate explanations, should carry you through the pre-teen years fairly smoothly. But fair warning: once those teenage years hit and complex reasoning kicks in, you’re in for a whole new ballgame. But we’ll get to that particular joy in a moment.

“You don’t pay her!” (Sorry, couldn’t resist the dad joke.) But all humor aside, welcome to the psychological warzone known as “The Teen Years.” If you thought explaining cannabis to your pre-teen was tricky, buckle up – you’re in for a wild ride.

What makes teenagers so different? In a word: everything. By thirteen, your sweet, accepting child has morphed into a walking paradox of complex reasoning and questionable decision-making. They’re developing their own opinions, challenging social norms, and thanks to the hormone monster residing in their developing brains, experiencing emotions with the intensity of a Michael Bay explosion.

Let’s be real – teenagers aren’t exactly operating at peak cognitive efficiency. And I say this with love, having been a spectacularly dumb teenager myself. Between raging hormones, peer pressure, and the desperate need to seem “cool,” their decision-making abilities often resemble a game of darts played blindfolded.

Here’s the kicker – at some point, your teen will encounter cannabis in the wild. Maybe at a party, behind the school gym, or through that one friend whose older brother “totally knows what he’s talking about.” They’ll be exposed to various narratives about weed, many of them wildly inaccurate. This is precisely why you need to step up your game and establish clear guidelines about responsible drug use.

Your message should be straightforward: Cannabis, like alcohol, is primarily for adults. Yes, it has medical applications for some young people, but recreational use should wait until their brains are fully developed. I recommend taking it a step further – tell them you’d love to be their first smoking buddy… when they’re old enough. This might sound counterintuitive, but it accomplishes two things: it acknowledges their future autonomy while establishing a clear boundary about present use.

This is also the time to have broader conversations about drugs in general. Don’t just stop at cannabis – discuss the good, the bad, and the ugly. Talk about different substances, the people who use them, and the various situations they might encounter. Not to frighten them, but to prepare them for the real world they’re about to enter.

The goal isn’t to lecture but to equip them with knowledge and critical thinking skills. They’re going to face these situations without you present, and you want them prepared to make informed decisions.

However – and this is crucial – read the room. If your kid innocently asks why you use cannabis, maybe hold off on sharing that wild story about the time you ate an entire pizza while convinced your cat was plotting against you. Keep it age-appropriate and relevant to their level of curiosity.

Remember, you’re not just teaching them about cannabis – you’re modeling how to have mature, honest conversations about complex topics. And in the hormone-addled battlefield of adolescence, that’s worth its weight in gold.

Here’s a plot twist that might surprise you – today’s kids are actually more straight-edge than we were. They’re drinking less, experimenting with fewer drugs, and even putting off sex longer than previous generations. Who would’ve thought that unlimited access to TikTok and social media would make getting high seem less appealing?

The irony isn’t lost on me. Just as us former “rebellious stoners” have become responsible cannabis-consuming parents, our kids are more likely to be found coding an app than hotboxing behind the gym. And let’s be honest – that’s probably a good thing.

But this shift in youth behavior coincides with a massive transformation in how society views cannabis. The plant that once sparked nationwide panic is now as commonplace as craft beer in many states. The “devil’s lettuce” has gone mainstream, and with it, our need to have more nuanced, honest conversations with our kids about its use.

Being upfront about your cannabis consumption isn’t about promoting drug use – it’s about fostering trust and open dialogue with your children. By discussing your own use responsibly and age-appropriately, you’re not just explaining a plant; you’re teaching critical thinking, personal responsibility, and the importance of making informed decisions.

It’s time to ditch the old taboos and stop pretending our teenagers are living in a bubble of innocence. The world they’re growing up in is complex, often chaotic, and full of choices we never had to face. The best gift we can give them isn’t protection from these realities, but the knowledge and confidence to navigate them wisely.

Because ultimately, that’s what good parenting is about – not shielding our kids from the world, but preparing them to face it head-on, armed with understanding, wisdom, and the ability to make smart choices. Even if that means having some uncomfortable conversations about your own relationship with cannabis along the way.

 

Inspiration:

https://www.reddit.com/r/entwives/comments/1i4gtx7/

how_are_we_talking_to_our_kids_about_cannabis_use/

 

PARENTING IN THE LEGALIZATION ERA, READ ON…

PARENTING CANNABIS TIPS

PARENTING IN THE TIME OF LEGALIZATION – FORBID IT OR ALLOW IT?



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

What if the World’s Biggest Tobacco Company Entered the Cannabis Industry?

Published

on

By


philip morris marijuana

The World’s Biggest Tobacco Company Is Quietly Entering The Weed Industry

What Does This Mean For The Future Of Weed?

 

From the 1950’s to the 1990’s, cigarettes were considered to be a ‘cool’ habit and somewhat of a fashion accessory globally.

 

There was even a time when Hollywood celebrities were photographed smoking, which made them seem like the epitome of sophistication. Big names including Humphrey Bogart and James Dean were pictured smoking, but it was also so common and accepted around the world. That did not last long, as eventually evidence that cigarettes killed people from cancer and other fatal health conditions became impossible to ignore.


While there were many names in Big Tobacco that helped popularize the consumption of cigarettes, and made it easy for people to get access to it, Philip Morris International (PMI) were one of the biggest players – and they still are, to this day. They own some of the most common cigarette brands that are consumed around the world, including Marlboro, Chesterfield, and L&M. Surely, one can blame PMI’s products for tempting people to make poor health choices that may have taken them to the grave…

 

According to the World Health Organization, tobacco smoking is responsible for the deaths of around 8 million people globally.


Yet, with the rise of cannabis, PMI wanted a piece of the pie.

 

The History Of Philip Morris’ Interests In Cannabis


If you’re only hearing about Big Tobacco’s interest in cannabis right now, you might be shocked to learn that their interest in weed goes as far back as 1969. There are some internal documents that prove PMI was interested in learning about the potential of cannabis. However, they were considering weed a competitor as well as a potential product.

In fact, a 1970 memo even shows that PMI acknowledges the possibility of marijuana legalization.


Fast forward to 2016, when PMI made a significant investment worth $20 million to an Israeli biotech firm specializing in medical cannabis, called Syqe Medical. At the time, Syqe was working on developing a medical marijuana inhaler which would provide metered dosing of weed for medical patients. According to the deal, Syqe Medical will also work on developing certain technologies that would enable Philip Morris to minimize the health effects caused by smoking.

 

By 2023, Philip Morris made a deal to acquire Syqe Medical for a cool $650 million, as long as there were certain conditions met. In a report by Calcalist, the deal features a number of milestones, though the bottom line is that if the inhaler developed by Syqe passes the clinical trials, PMI will then go ahead to buy all shares of the company for the aforementioned amount.

 

Another Silent Move Into The Weed Space

 

More recently, in January 2025, a press release was published detailing Vectura Fertin Pharma’s (VFP), a subsidiary of Philip Morris International, joint venture with a Canadian biotech firm focusing on cannabinoid-based drugs – Avicanna.

 

According to the press release, the joint venture seeks to promote cannabis accessibility and research. Avicanna already has a stronghold in the wellness sector. However, the press release hardly makes any other mention about the involvement of Philip Morris International, but it’s clear that Big Tobacco has long had their eye in the cannabis industry. Back in 2016, when they first got involved with Syqe Medical, it highlighted the firm’s interest in wellness, but the partnership with Avicanna cements that.

 

Changes In Consumer Perception And Habits

 

It only makes sense for Big Tobacco to pivot to cannabis – or wellness, in general. After all, if you can’t beat em, join em!


And it’s clear: for several years now, there has been a decrease in cigarette smoking; young adults are now shifting from tobacco, as well as alcohol, and increasing their cannabis consumption instead.

 

And Philip Morris isn’t the only player in Big Tobacco who’s expressed an interest in a slice of the (weed) pie. Back in 2017, American holding company Altria Group began moving away from cigarettes, with their $1.8 billion investment into the Cronos Group, a large Canadian cannabis company. Altria owns several big American companies including Philip Morris; so much so, that even their website now declares the tagline: “Moving Beyond Smoking”.

 

However, Altria faced issues due to regulatory concerns.

 

British American Tobacco (BAT) has also been interested in cannabis. For some time now, they’ve been researching weed products, particularly infusing CBD and THC into their electronic cigarettes which are sold under the Vuse and Vype brand names. In 2021, BAT began a trial launch of CBD products in the United Kingdom.


RJ Reynolds, which is also now under British American Tobacco, has also considered joining the weed industry. According to internal documents, RJ Reynolds has considered cannabis both an opportunity and a competitor as far back as the 1970s.

 

Conclusion


At the end of the day, cannabis isn’t a real threat to the tobacco industry. The tobacco industry simply shot itself on the foot – all it needed was time, to prove that it does indeed cause cancer and kill people. On the other hand, cannabis was a friend more than a foe: legalization and a growing consumption of weed proved its ability to save lives.

 

That said, the relationship between tobacco and weed continues to evolve. Through cannabis legalization, Big Tobacco can learn from the challenges and opportunities that cannabis had to go through. It can be said that one thing is clear, though: the drop in tobacco consumption is a major opportunity for cannabis, with more people looking to substitute tobacco with a healthier alternative.

As a response, we may continue to see tobacco companies investing in Big Cannabis – just as we’ve seen in the examples mentioned above. This partnership is fantastic news for both industries, and we can only hope to see more!  

 

PHILIP MORRIS’ MOVES IN CANNABIS, READ ON…

PHILIP MORRIS BUYS MEDICAL MARIJUANA INHALER

WHY DID PHILIP MORRIS JUST BUY A MEDICAL MARIJUANA INHALER COMPANY?



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Who are the Next 5 States to Legalize Recreational or Medical Cannabis Starting in 2025?

Published

on

By


next states to legalize

As the landscape of marijuana legalization continues to evolve across the United States, 2025 is shaping up to be a pivotal year for states considering reforms. Advocacy groups are closely monitoring legislative developments and public sentiment, identifying specific states that are likely to make significant strides toward legalization. This article explores the states most likely to legalize marijuana in 2025, examining the political climate, public opinion, and advocacy efforts that may influence these changes.

 

The Current State of Marijuana Legalization in the U.S.

 

As of 2023, a growing number of states have legalized marijuana for both medical and recreational use. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), 21 states and Washington D.C. have legalized recreational marijuana, while 37 states allow medical marijuana use. This rapid expansion reflects changing public attitudes toward cannabis, which have shifted dramatically over the past two decades.

 

Public Opinion Trends

 

Public support for marijuana legalization has reached unprecedented levels. A Gallup poll conducted in late 2022 found that 68% of Americans support legalizing marijuana, a significant increase from just 25% in 1995. This shift in public opinion is crucial for lawmakers as they consider new legislation. Advocacy groups are leveraging this support to push for reforms in states where legalization has yet to occur.

 

 The Role of Advocacy Groups

 

Organizations such as the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) and the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) play a vital role in advocating for legalization. They provide research, mobilize grassroots campaigns, and lobby lawmakers to promote cannabis reform. Their insights into which states are most likely to legalize in 2025 are based on legislative trends, political dynamics, and public sentiment.

 

Key States Likely to Legalize Marijuana in 2025

 

Pennsylvania has emerged as a strong contender for marijuana legalization in 2025. The state has a robust medical marijuana program established in 2016 that has seen significant success, with over 600,000 registered patients. However, advocates argue that the time has come to expand access to adult-use cannabis.

 

Political Support

 

The recent election of Governor Josh Shapiro has energized legalization efforts. Shapiro has expressed support for legalizing recreational marijuana and has indicated a willingness to work with lawmakers across party lines. In early 2025, a bipartisan bill is expected to be introduced that aims to create a regulated market for adult-use cannabis.

 

 Advocacy Efforts

 

Advocacy groups are actively mobilizing support among residents and lawmakers alike. Campaigns highlighting the potential economic benefits—such as job creation and tax revenue—are gaining traction. Additionally, public polls indicate strong support among Pennsylvanians for legalization, further bolstering advocacy efforts.

 

Hawaii has long been known for its progressive stance on cannabis; it was one of the first states to legalize medical marijuana in 2000. However, efforts to legalize recreational use have stalled in previous legislative sessions.

 

 Current Developments

 

In 2025, advocates are optimistic about renewed efforts to pass comprehensive cannabis legislation. The Senate previously approved a bill aimed at legalizing recreational use, but it failed in the House due to opposition from conservative lawmakers.

 

 Political Dynamics

The political landscape appears more favorable this year with new leadership in the House that may be more open to discussing cannabis reform. Governor Josh Green has also expressed support for legalization, emphasizing its potential economic benefits for Hawaii’s tourism-driven economy.

 

 Advocacy Strategies

 

Advocacy groups are focusing on grassroots campaigns and community engagement to build momentum for legalization. Public forums and educational events aim to inform residents about the benefits of legalization while addressing concerns regarding regulation and safety.

 

South Carolina has made strides toward medical marijuana legalization but remains one of the few states without comprehensive access to cannabis products. In recent years, lawmakers have introduced several bills aimed at establishing a medical program; however, these efforts have faced significant hurdles.

 

 Legislative Prospects for 2025

 

In 2025, advocates are hopeful that a revived medical marijuana proposal will gain traction. The proposed legislation would allow patients with qualifying conditions access through licensed pharmacies under strict regulations.

 

 Political Climate

 

The political climate remains challenging, with resistance from conservative factions within the legislature. However, increasing public support—evidenced by recent polls showing over 70% approval for medical cannabis—may sway some lawmakers toward supporting reform.

 

 Advocacy Efforts

 

Advocacy organizations like SC Compassionate Care are working tirelessly to educate the public and legislators about the benefits of medical marijuana. They emphasize patient stories and health outcomes as part of their strategy to garner support.

 

Kansas is one of the few remaining states without any form of legalized marijuana use. Despite this restrictive environment, there is a growing movement advocating for medical cannabis legislation.

 

 Legislative Opportunities

 

In 2025, advocates believe there is a significant opportunity for progress on medical marijuana legislation. Several bills have been introduced in previous sessions that gained some bipartisan support but ultimately failed due to opposition from key lawmakers.

 

 Public Sentiment

 

Public opinion in Kansas is shifting; recent surveys indicate that nearly 60% of residents support legalizing medical marijuana. This growing acceptance may influence legislators who have previously opposed reform.

 

 Advocacy Strategies

 

Groups like Kansas Cannabis Coalition are actively campaigning for change by organizing rallies and educational events throughout the state. They aim to raise awareness about the therapeutic benefits of cannabis while pushing for legislative action.

 

North Carolina has been making headlines regarding potential cannabis reform. While it currently allows limited use of CBD oil for certain medical conditions, comprehensive medical or recreational legalization remains elusive.

 

 Political Dynamics

 

In recent years, there have been increased discussions among lawmakers about introducing medical marijuana legislation. The current governor supports reform efforts; however, opposition from conservative members poses challenges.

 

 Advocacy Efforts

 

Advocacy groups such as NC NORML are working diligently to build grassroots support for legalization initiatives. They focus on educating citizens about cannabis benefits while lobbying legislators directly.

 

Wisconsin’s approach toward cannabis remains conservative compared to neighboring states like Illinois and Michigan. While some local municipalities have decriminalized possession or implemented medicinal programs at their discretion, comprehensive statewide reform is still lacking.

 

 Legislative Prospects

Advocates believe that changing political dynamics could lead Wisconsin toward more progressive policies regarding both medical and adult-use legalization by 2025. Recent elections have resulted in a more favorable balance within state government regarding cannabis issues.

 

Public Support

 

Public opinion polls indicate strong support among Wisconsinites—over 60% favoring legalization efforts—creating an opportunity for advocates seeking legislative change.

 

Advocacy Strategies

 

Organizations like Wisconsin NORML are mobilizing citizens through educational campaigns aimed at dispelling myths surrounding cannabis while promoting its economic benefits through taxation and job creation associated with regulated markets.

 

New Hampshire has long been considered an outlier among New England states regarding cannabis laws; it legalized medical marijuana back in 2013 but has yet to pass adult-use legislation despite numerous attempts over recent years.

 

Current Developments

 

In early 2025, advocates anticipate renewed efforts aimed at legalizing recreational use through proposed bills introduced during legislative sessions scheduled throughout spring months ahead.

 

 Political Climate

 

While there is bipartisan interest among some legislators regarding potential reforms related specifically towards taxation structures associated with regulated markets—opposition remains strong from conservative factions within government bodies overall limiting chances significantly unless public pressure mounts significantly enough leading into future elections cycles ahead!

 

Virginia made headlines when it legalized recreational cannabis possession starting July 1st ,2021—but sales remain unregulated until further action occurs within state government bodies responsible overseeing these matters moving forward!

 

Legislative Prospects

 

Advocates believe that enhancing existing laws by adding regulated sales will be crucial steps towards creating an effective market structure benefiting consumers while generating tax revenue needed fund essential services statewide!

 

 Conclusion

 

As we look ahead into 2025—the landscape surrounding marijuana legalization continues evolving rapidly across various states nationwide! With growing public support coupled alongside advocacy group efforts pushing forward reforms—it’s clear many opportunities exist within multiple jurisdictions ripe opportunities await those willing engage actively participate shaping future policies governing this vital industry.

 

WHAT STATES MAY NEVER LEGALIZE WEED, READ ON…

STATES TO NEVER LEGALIZE WEED

WHAT STATES MAY NEVER LEGALIZE WEED, HERE ARE 4 IDEAS!



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media