Cannabis News
The First Brick in the Wall?
Can you imagine what it felt like to be the first person chipping at the Berlin Wall with a sledgehammer? Swinging with all your might to puncture that first hole in the ideological barrier dividing a nation.
The war on cannabis in America has felt similar for decades. The DEA serves as border patrol, enforcing prohibition despite the damage inflicted on communities.
Like with Cold War Berlin, we’ve only glimpsed legalization through cracks, while they aim to fortify the status quo. But maintaining this division has caused as much harm as any totalitarian regime.
The DEA justifies it as “public safety” even as drugs pervade max security prisons. You can’t restrain human nature with handcuffs. People want what people want.
But the DEA is strategically clinging to outdated mandates, stalling as the tides of history pass them by. They know nationwide legalization is inevitable, so they’re angling to shape-shift into the new enforcers.
Now Congress has challenged their legitimacy by demanding full descheduling. That first true sledgehammer blow to start dismantling their wall.
The DEA feels its footing tremble as public opinion sways. They can’t suppress this awakening forever.
This could be the first rupture signaling impending policy change. Or the DEA may fortify in defiance a bit longer. Either way, prohibition’s days now seem numbered as reform momentum builds.
The letter reflects the people’s will, not rogue politicians. Americans are rightly questioning cannabis’s Schedule 1 status and deserve transparency, not redacted reports.
Only time will tell if the wall crumbles rapidly or through drawn out siege. But eventually the divide must collapse to free this plant and restore civil liberties. With enough voices united, the old mentality buckles.
Unlike other wars, cannabis proved that legalization is possible. It’s no longer “if”, but “yes” it certainly can be done effectively. Colorado dispensaries have a 99% compliance with their age requirements, whereas under prohibition – street dealers don’t care. Well, perhaps some of them care, but you get the picture…they don’t card on the streets!
Nonetheless, it’s refreshing to see some parts of Congress lobbying and swinging hammers until the whole wall comes down. The DEA’s days as ideological border patrol are numbered. However, this makes them all the more dangerous. They are increasing research, sending redacted reports as if it’s some top secret shit no one knows about….but before I get too far ahead of myself, let’s go back to the beginning….
If you haven’t heard…a coalition of 31 bipartisan House lawmakers recently sent a historic letter to DEA Administrator Anne Milgram regarding federal cannabis policy.
The core message? That the DEA should go beyond simply rescheduling cannabis to fully removing it from the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) altogether.
The letter argues the DEA’s ongoing review of cannabis scheduling “represents a necessary step in the work to end the federal government’s failed and discriminatory prohibition of cannabis.”
However, it notes that rescheduling alone has significant limitations:
“Additionally, ending the unjust scheduling of marijuana and normalizing federal cannabis regulation go hand-in-hand. The federal government must correct this prohibition and the continued criminalization of otherwise legal marijuana—creating legal job opportunities, promoting public safety not unjust incarceration, and upholding established state regulation of cannabis production, taxation, and sales.”
The lawmakers urge the DEA to recognize that full descheduling, not just rescheduling, is needed:
“The administration and relevant agencies such as yours should recognize the merits of full descheduling and work with congressional leaders to ensure this happens.”
They argue descheduling would help law enforcement priorities and support state-legal cannabis businesses:
“Descheduling is necessary to end the harmful federal marijuana prohibition and help our law enforcement officers appropriately prioritize public safety. Descheduling also provides the clearest path to address the legal uncertainty facing small businesses in states with regulated cannabis markets by creating opportunities for regulating and taxing commercial marijuana activities.”
Additionally, the letter notes the public opinion trends and state policy shifts that make maintaining cannabis prohibition untenable:
“The vast majority of states have enacted some form of legalization, and members from both sides of the aisle have introduced legislation to follow suit at the federal level. Additionally, the House has twice passed comprehensive legalization legislation.”
It concludes the DEA must update its stance to reflect political and social realities:
“It is time that [DEA’s] work fully reflects this reality as well. Marijuana’s continued inappropriate scheduling is both arcane and out-of-touch with the will of the American people.”
This historic letter signals growing Congressional momentum to end federal prohibition. It directly presses the DEA to cooperate with descheduling or risk being overruled legislatively.
The DEA just pulled a seriously “shady move” in response to calls for cannabis rescheduling. Rather than show its work, they sent Congress a highly redacted letter that concealed their process and positions.
This evasive non-transparency perfectly captures why the DEA can’t be trusted as an objective agency – they serve themselves and pharma paymasters, not the public.
Let’s examine how sketchy this is. Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recommended the DEA reschedule cannabis to Schedule III. This reflects accumulated evidence it has medical value while simultaneously paying homage to their pharma overlords.
But rather than share the full scientific report outlining this rationale, the DEA’s 2-page response to Congress blacks out everything substantive – the date, author, and review contents are literally redacted.
All we can see is the agency stalling and shielding itself from accountability. This is governance by opacity and obstruction.
It’s appalling that an agency empowered to deprive citizens of liberty operates completely in the shadows. They act as ideological enforcers, not public servants.
This latest evasion comes amidst unprecedented pressure to reform prohibition. With untenable status quo crumbling, the DEA is in face-saving self-preservation mode.
Rather than have an honest dialogue around cannabis, they hide behind smokescreens. Because open transparency would reveal the façade of “safety” propping up prohibition.
Unlike other agencies, the DEA clings to a militarized, anti-science posture as democracy passes it by. It fears the light because it knows its power relies on shadow governance backed by fear, not facts.
A just authority would welcome open public scrutiny of its processes. It would demonstrate commitment to “following the science” with full transparency.
But the DEA inverts such democratic norms. They evade and obfuscate because full disclosure would undermine their agenda and legitimacy.
This mentality emanates directly from the agency’s roots in oppressing minorities and anti-war activists. It’s never been about humane governance.
The DEA’s secretive behavior begs some troubling questions:
-
Why does a tax-funded agency feel entitled to redact science from public view? Whose interests does this secrecy serve?
-
How can they claim authority while avoiding scrutiny? What are they hiding in these reports?
-
Why does an unelected agency wield such unilateral power over health policy against public opinion?
-
Why won’t they engage in good faith dialogue around cannabis? What fears make them retreat into the shadows?
-
How much influence does pharmaceutical lobbying have over DEA policy? Follow the money trail.
-
Can we trust scientific conclusions shaped entirely behind closed doors by entrenched ideologues? Blind trust in authority invites abuse.
The time has come to shed light on this shadowy agency and restore legitimacy. Operating clandestinely, the DEA invites zero confidence in its impartiality. They must now choose either transparency or irrelevance. Because democracy demands public agencies answer to those they govern, not special interests.
The days when an elite cabal could shape public consciousness from smoke-filled rooms are coming to an end. We can see it in all sectors of society. I don’t know how, I don’t know exactly when – they will all come tumbling down and as a result the DEA will become obsolete over time, consumed by other agencies or simply replaced by something that actually works to serve the people.
Prohibition arose from propaganda and racism, not reason or care. We who have suffered under its abuses will no longer tolerate governance without consent or accountability. If the DEA redacting its findings isn’t enough to make you question their motives – then you’re probably a fed.
As the first brick gets hammered from the Berlin Wall of prohibition, louder tremors rumble through the halls of shadow governance. The DEA and their globalist puppeteers feel their power eroding in this new age of transparency.
For decades, elite cabals shaped public policy behind a veneer of democracy. But now the veil lifts, exposing how agencies like the DEA act not as neutral arbiters of science but enforcers of special interest agendas.
This reflects the larger decline of trust in institutions built not on reason but suppression and propaganda. The facade crumbles away, and the people begin reclaiming their sovereignty.
Make no mistake, those drunk on power cling desperately to control as it slips through their fingers. The DEA tries obscuring truth to fortify the walls, hoping to ride out this swell of public awakening and scrutiny.
But the tide of history tolerates no masters, no matter their wealth or weapons. The divine clock brings all to justice in the end. The more the DEA retreats into unaccountable shadow governance, the faster their legitimacy dies. Their refusal to engage openly reveals the bankruptcy of lies underpinning prohibition. Only for those who are willing to see of course. And fortunately, there are more and more of us every single day.
Rather than evolve – because it is against their very nature – they vainly fortify a status quo already buckling under its own lies. But eventually, the monolith fractures from inner decay. No barrier survives the people united.
The globalists miscalculated badly, thinking cannabis prohibition could be upheld indefinitely through force and propaganda. Or maybe they knew this day would come as even Berlin’s edifice came tumbling down before a wave of truth.
Now the cracks in their dividing wall widen as we keep chipping away in solidarity. Soon, the final barricades must collapse before the swelling tides of reform.
Let the clumsy machinations of obsolescent orders flail and resist. No rulers can maintain the grip of oppression for too long as they awaken a slumbering giant, ready to eradicate the parasite class.
The sticky bottom line is this: we the people write the final chapter. No policy can reign without public consent or complacency. And the light of conscience shines into even the deepest cellars of corruption.
One of these days, the giant will awaken…and this wall will come crumbling down. Stay vigilant fellow stoners!
THE DEA IS CRUMBLING, READ ON…
SMOKING A JOINT WHILE THE DEA EMPIRE CRUMBLES?
Cannabis has so many compounds, and two that have been making the rounds lately are HHC and Delta 9 THC. They’re not the same thing, even though they’re both cannabinoids that interact with the body’s endocannabinoid system. Some people want a mild, steady experience, while others might be looking for something more intense. Understanding these two can help you figure out what’s right for you.
What Is HHC?
HHC, short for hexahydrocannabinol, is a hydrogenated version of THC. It’s not something you’d find naturally in large amounts in cannabis plants. Instead, it’s made through a process that adds hydrogen molecules to THC. The result? A more stable compound that’s less prone to breaking down when exposed to heat or UV light.
How HHC Is Made
Think of it like a science experiment. HHC is usually created in a lab by taking Delta 9 or Delta 8 THC and using hydrogenation—basically, combining it with hydrogen under pressure and in the presence of a catalyst. This process changes its structure while keeping its effects somewhat similar to THC.
Common Uses and Effects of HHC
People who use HHC say it’s somewhere between Delta 8 and Delta 9 in terms of effects. It’s often described as relaxing but without being overly sedative. You might feel a light buzz, reduced stress, or mild euphoria. Some even claim it helps with discomfort or improving sleep, but solid research is still catching up. Since it’s less potent than Delta 9, it’s often favored by those who want a manageable experience without the strong psychoactive punch.
If you’re interested in trying HHC and Delta 9 for yourself, check out their wide range of products at trycandycloud.com. They’ve got everything from gummies to disposable vapes, all crafted for a smooth experience.
What Is Delta 9 THC?
Delta 9 THC is the main psychoactive compound in cannabis. It’s the reason you feel “high” when you use weed. Chemically speaking, Delta 9 has a double bond in its ninth carbon chain, which plays a big role in how it interacts with your brain.
Natural Occurrence in Cannabis
This one is straightforward: Delta 9 is found in high concentrations in marijuana plants. It’s what most people think of when they hear “THC.” Unlike HHC, there’s no need for a lab process—it’s already there. Hemp plants, however, contain much lower levels of Delta 9 THC, which is why it’s primarily extracted from marijuana.
Common Uses and Effects of Delta 9 THC
The effects of Delta 9 are well-documented. Depending on the dose, you might feel euphoria, increased appetite, or deep relaxation. For medical users, it’s often used to manage chronic pain, nausea, and other conditions. It’s also been studied for its potential benefits in anxiety relief, though higher doses might have the opposite effect, causing paranoia. Delta 9 THC is versatile, but it’s not without its risks, particularly for new users or those sensitive to its psychoactive effects.
Key Differences Between HHC and Delta 9 THC
Chemical Structure and Composition
The main difference is in their structure. Delta 9 THC has that iconic double bond, while HHC’s hydrogenation makes it more stable. This difference might not mean much to the average person, but it’s why HHC is less likely to degrade over time.
Potency Levels
Delta 9 THC is generally more potent. HHC might require a higher dose to get a comparable effect, but some people prefer its lighter touch. Potency differences can also depend on the method of consumption, with edibles typically providing a stronger, longer-lasting effect compared to vaping or smoking.
Duration of Effects
Both last a few hours, but some users report that HHC’s effects fade more gradually. Delta 9, on the other hand, can have a sharper comedown. HHC’s gradual fade makes it appealing for those who want a smooth end to their experience.
Benefits and Drawbacks of HHC and Delta 9 THC
HHC: Pros and Cons
Pros:
- More stable, so it lasts longer on the shelf.
- Effects are milder, making it less overwhelming for beginners.
- Can be a functional option for daytime use.
Cons:
- Limited research, so we don’t know its full impact yet.
- Availability can be hit or miss depending on where you live.
- Legal gray area in many regions.
Delta 9 THC: Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Well-studied with established medical uses.
- Widely available in areas where cannabis is legal.
- Stronger effects make it ideal for experienced users or those with high tolerance.
Cons:
- Higher chance of side effects like anxiety.
- More likely to show up on drug tests.
- Shorter shelf life compared to HHC.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q. Is HHC safer than Delta 9 THC?
Not enough research exists to say definitively, but HHC’s milder effects might make it feel safer to some users.
Q. Will HHC or Delta 9 THC show up on a drug test?
Yes, both can potentially show up on a drug test, so use with caution if that’s a concern.
Q. Which one is better for recreational use?
That depends on your preferences. HHC is great for a mellow time, while Delta 9 is better if you’re looking for something more intense.
HHC vs. Delta 9: Choosing the Right One for You
The choice comes down to what you’re after. If you want a milder, more laid-back experience, HHC might be a good option. On the other hand, if you’re looking for something stronger or need it for medical reasons, Delta 9 is the way to go. It also depends on what’s legal and available where you are. And always consider your tolerance levels and experience before diving in. If you’re unsure, consult with a knowledgeable dispensary staff.
Resources:
Cannabis News
What Federally Illegal Drug Has Created Almost $10 Billion in Sales Tax Revenue for States in the Last 40 Months?
In a significant development for the burgeoning cannabis industry, the U.S. Census Bureau has reported that states across the nation have collectively amassed over **$9.7 billion** in tax revenue from marijuana sales since mid-2021. This figure underscores the economic impact of legalized cannabis and highlights the growing acceptance of marijuana as both a recreational and medicinal substance in various states. As more states move toward legalization, the financial implications both positive and negative are becoming increasingly evident.
The Landscape of Cannabis Legalization
The journey toward cannabis legalization in the United States has been long and complex. Initially criminalized in the early 20th century, cannabis began to regain acceptance in the late 20th century, particularly for medical use. The first state to legalize medical marijuana was California in 1996, setting a precedent that many states would follow.
By 2012, Colorado and Washington became the first states to legalize recreational cannabis, paving the way for a wave of legalization efforts across the country. As of now, more than 20 states have legalized recreational marijuana, while over 30 states allow medical use. This shift reflects changing public attitudes toward cannabis and recognition of its potential benefits.
Economic Implications of Legalization
The legalization of cannabis has not only transformed social norms but has also created a substantial economic impact. States that have embraced legalization have seen significant increases in tax revenue, job creation, and investment opportunities.
According to the latest Census Bureau report, states like California, Colorado, Illinois, and Michigan have emerged as leaders in cannabis tax revenue generation. These states have implemented various tax structures on marijuana sales, including excise taxes, sales taxes, and local taxes. The revenue generated is often earmarked for essential public services such as education, healthcare, infrastructure improvements, and drug rehabilitation programs.
Breakdown of Tax Revenue by State
As the largest legal cannabis market in the United States, California has been at the forefront of marijuana tax revenue generation. Since mid-2021, California has contributed approximately $2.5 billion to state coffers from cannabis taxes. This revenue is derived from both recreational and medical marijuana sales.
California’s tax structure includes a 15% excise tax on retail sales, along with local taxes that can vary significantly by city and county. The state has allocated a portion of these funds to various programs aimed at addressing issues related to drug abuse and public health.
Colorado was one of the pioneers in cannabis legalization and continues to serve as a model for other states. Since mid-2021, Colorado has generated around $1.8 billion in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state imposes a 15% excise tax on wholesale marijuana transactions and a 2.9% sales tax on retail sales.
The revenue generated from cannabis taxes has been instrumental in funding education initiatives through the Public School Fund, as well as supporting mental health programs and substance abuse treatment services.
Illinois has seen remarkable growth in its cannabis market since legalizing recreational use in January 2020. In just two years, Illinois has collected approximately $1 billion in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state imposes a tiered excise tax based on the potency of the product, ranging from 10% to 25%.
The funds collected are allocated to various initiatives, including community reinvestment programs aimed at addressing social equity issues related to past drug enforcement practices.
Michigan’s cannabis market has also flourished since legalization. Since mid-2021, Michigan has generated about $700 million in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state’s tax structure includes a 10% excise tax on recreational marijuana and a 6% sales tax.
The revenue is utilized for various purposes, including education funding and support for local governments impacted by legalization.
Broader Economic Impact
The legalization of cannabis has led to significant job creation across various sectors. According to industry reports, the legal cannabis market supports hundreds of thousands of jobs nationwide—from cultivation and processing to retail and distribution. As more states legalize marijuana, this trend is expected to continue.
With the growth of the legal cannabis industry comes increased investment opportunities. Entrepreneurs are entering the market at an unprecedented rate, leading to innovations in product development, marketing strategies, and distribution channels. This influx of investment not only benefits individual businesses but also stimulates local economies.
Social Equity Considerations
While the financial benefits of cannabis legalization are clear, it is essential to address social equity issues that arise alongside this new industry. Many states have recognized that communities disproportionately affected by past drug enforcement policies should benefit from legalization efforts.
States like Illinois have implemented community reinvestment programs that allocate a portion of cannabis tax revenues to support communities impacted by previous drug laws. These funds can be used for education initiatives, job training programs, and mental health services—aiming to rectify historical injustices associated with cannabis prohibition.
In addition to financial support for communities affected by past policies, some states are also working to create equitable licensing opportunities for individuals from those communities. By prioritizing applications from minority-owned businesses or those directly impacted by previous drug laws, states can foster a more inclusive cannabis industry.
Challenges Ahead
Despite the significant progress made through legalization efforts, challenges remain on both state and federal levels.
Federal Legalization Uncertainty
One major hurdle is the ongoing conflict between state and federal laws regarding cannabis. While many states have legalized marijuana for recreational or medical use, it remains classified as a Schedule I substance under federal law. This discrepancy creates complications for businesses operating legally at the state level but facing potential federal prosecution.
Efforts toward federal legalization or decriminalization have gained traction recently; however, progress remains slow due to political divisions and differing opinions on drug policy reform.
Regulatory Hurdles
As more states enter the legal cannabis market, regulatory frameworks must evolve to ensure consumer safety while promoting fair competition among businesses. States face challenges related to product testing standards, labeling requirements, advertising restrictions, and taxation policies that can impact market dynamics.
Conclusion
The U.S. Census Bureau reports that states have collected over $9.7 billion in marijuana tax revenue since mid-2021, highlighting the significant economic impact of cannabis legalization. As public acceptance grows, more states are likely to pursue legalization. Despite ongoing challenges, including federal regulations and social equity issues, legalized cannabis is poised to remain a vital part of state economies. Collaboration among government officials, business leaders, and community advocates will be essential for fostering an equitable and sustainable cannabis industry. This evolving landscape not only presents economic growth opportunities but also addresses historical injustices tied to drug policy enforcement, shaping the future of cannabis legislation in the U.S.
WHAT STATES HAVE THE HIGHEST WEED TAXES? READ ON…
HHC vs. Delta 9: Differences & Similarities
DOJ Asks Federal Court To Deny Doctors’ Lawsuit Over Marijuana Rescheduling Hearing To Avoid ‘Undue Delay’
What Federally Illegal Drug Has Created Almost $10 Billion in Sales Tax Revenue for States in the Last 40 Months?
Three Wise Men Give Marijuana Strain Gift Suggestions
Tasmanian Hemp Assoc Bids Goodbye To Australian Hemp Council
Teen Marijuana Use Continues To Drop With Legalization
The Best Cocktails To Make You Feel Festive
Cannabis predictions for 2025: Low prices, high taxes, and hash
Oregon Cannabis: State of the State (2024)
Are MSOs Just Big Pharma on Steriods?
Distressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™
United States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)
What you Need to Know
Drug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog
NCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program
It has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax
Cannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022
A new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse
Your Go-To Source for Cannabis Logos and Designs
UArizona launches online cannabis compliance online course
-
Cannabis News2 years agoDistressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™
-
One-Hit Wonders2 years agoUnited States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)
-
Cannabis 1012 years agoWhat you Need to Know
-
drug testing1 year agoDrug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog
-
Education2 years agoNCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program
-
Cannabis2 years agoIt has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax
-
Marijuana Business Daily2 years agoCannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022
-
California2 years agoA new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse