Cannabis News
The Kids Will All Be Getting High Turns Out to Be 100% Wrong and Another Reefer Madness Myth Debunked
Published
1 year agoon
By
admin
Turns out the kids were alright
As Cannabis.net covered the latest teen marijuana study here, turns out teen marijuana use does not go up with legalization.
For decades, prohibitionists have claimed that legalizing cannabis would send the wrong message to kids, leading to rampant increases in underage marijuana use. “We’d basically be telling our youth that it’s acceptable,” they argued, using the talking point to stir moral panic and block reform efforts. However, now that data is emerging from the growing number of states ending prohibition, those old arguments are crumbling.
New federal survey results continue to defy the notion that legalization enables youth access and promotes teen consumption. In fact, the trends seem to reveal quite the opposite – despite nearly a dozen more states opening recreational markets since 2020, underage marijuana use has remained completely stable according to the latest Monitoring the Future (MTF) study. So much for the theory that legal dispensaries on every corner would lead to our children blazing up with abandon.
It turns out all that rhetoric about sending the “wrong message” was just reefer madness without evidence. Teen marijuana use has not risen “even as state legalization has proliferated across the country,” according to federal health officials. If anything, perceptions of risk and lack of availability seem to have discouraged underage experimentation beyond pre-pandemic rates.
The data makes it clear – our long-held fears about how ending prohibition would influence kids were based on guesswork and stigma, not facts. Our drug policies led to the incarceration and marginalization of millions – and for what? The same groups we claimed to “protect” show no differences in use rates based on legality. It’s the latest evidence that this moral panic was overblown from the start.
So in today’s article, we’ll analyze the recent federal survey results and trends over time to explore why legalization seems to have so little influence on real teen behavior. We’ll discuss what it means for the outdated idea that prohibition somehow shields youth. And we’ll reflect on how biased drug war messaging ultimately caused far more harm to society than cannabis itself ever could. The facts require us to rethink everything we were taught about “sending messages” to the young. It’s time to have an honest discussion based in truth.
Taking a closer look at the latest federal data reveals stable trends in teen marijuana use that fail to support prohibitionist rhetoric. The Monitoring the Future (MTF) survey showed no statistically significant increases in adolescent cannabis consumption from 2020 to 2022, even as more states enacted legalization policies.
According to the survey results, past-month marijuana use for 8th, 10th and 12th graders has hovered between 6.6 – 8.3%, 16.5 – 17.8%, and 28.4 – 29% respectively over the past three years. These rates remain below pre-pandemic levels as well, despite historic highs in adult use. In other words, the data suggest that “whatever is happening with adult-use legalization across the country has not really impacted the younger people,” says Chief Marsha Lopez of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)’s epidemiology branch.
Even perceptions of cannabis access and availability are on the decline among adolescents, bucking expectations. “In fact, that has been trending downward over the years,” Lopez remarked. This reveals the flaw in arguments that more dispensaries automatically enable diversion to kids – if anything, regulated markets appear to reduce youth access. Lopez also highlighted the “steadier declines in the perception of harm without the corresponding increases in use” typically expected as stigma drops.
In essence, neither perceived harm nor availability seem correlated to actual teen consumption patterns amid continuing legalization efforts.
Additionally, the prevalence of daily adolescent marijuana use has held “remarkably steady for the last 10 years,” showing little fluctuation even as recreational markets started opening. This challenges rhetoric about the “normalization” of cannabis somehow promoting increased habitual use. In fact, Lopez shared that “there have been no substantial increases at all” in that daily use rate.
Comparisons between prohibition states and those with medical marijuana laws also showed no statistically significant differences in past-year consumption rates among teenagers of any grade. The slight variances that did appear followed no predictable pattern regarding policy outlook. For instance, 8th graders in medical states saw cannabis as less risky but weren’t more likely to use it. The evidence does not support clear associations between any given regulatory scheme and youth behavior changes.
Ultimately the survey data reveals stable equilibriums in adolescent marijuana use over time, regardless of broader legalization efforts. This fails to explain why teen behavior would somehow hinge more on criminalization policies that primarily affect adults. In essence, the data shows kids will be kids whether we end prohibition or not. The expectations that legalization would clearly influence youth were biased speculation without solid basis.
When prohibition ends, the expectation might be that sudden availability will lead to rampant youth access and use. Yet historically, illicit drugs have remained widely available to teens regardless of illegality. Meanwhile, no policy can fully prevent adolescent experimentation. So in many ways, stable youth usage despite legalization makes intrinsic sense.
Even under prohibition, underground markets thrive off demand from all ages. Minors who want to use cannabis have always been able to get it through peer connections, whether legal dispensaries exist or not. Perhaps the only real difference is removing criminal middlemen who once enabled thataccess.
With storefronts checking IDs and limiting diversion, many youth actually perceived decreasing availability post-legalization. So the assumption that simply having aboveboard retail options would automatically expand teen access appears flawed. If anything, regulation chokes off the supply chanels they relied upon.
And when policy changes fail to significantly impact access, use levels follow suit. Adolescents consume based more on developmental factors, peer pressure and perceived harms over mere availability. Since legalization didn’t drastically alter these core drivers, stability isn’t shocking.
Essentially, teens will be teens, whether cannabis sits behind the counter legally or gets slipped covertly. Usage rates reflect larger cultural influences beyond regulated sales. The same kids occasionaly smoking weed illegally are largely still doing so post-reform because external deterrents remain similar. Criminalization simply pushes activities underground without preventing them.
In that sense, bringing cannabis commerce into daylight may even provide opportunities to deter youth use through candid education over scare tactics. Where prohibition breeds mystery and allure, realistic guidance on moderation could help lead by example.
We see it with alcohol – despite legality and availability, less than 15% of U.S. teens drink weekly because acceptance coexists with transparency about risks. Perhaps the same balance can be struck over time regarding youth and cannabis as reform advances.
In states with established legal markets, generations are gradually growing up knowing cannabis exists openly in society, like alcohol. But thus far data doesn’t show that environment significantly increasing their likelihood to use it. Kids aren’t suddenly picking up new habits simply because local dispensaries start opening under a taxed and regulated model.
And even where experimentation occurs, the risks remain similar to legal substances. As with alcohol, only a small fraction go on to seriously problematic usage. Most reflect the moderate majority who exercise free choice responsibly regardless of policy. So whether modern youth live under prohibition or legalization, behaviors stay largely the same.
Perhaps these insights give hope that ending criminalization need not equate to condoning increased use – including for teens. Like alcohol, safe enjoyment in moderation needn’t be forfeited to prevent hazardous excess. And reasonable laws needn’t forfeit rights to curb abuses most wouldn’t consider exercising anyway.
With the myth of legalization enabling youth use scientifically shattered, we must rethink what example society should set. Does continuing a failing prohibition actually protect kids – or progress towards system that equips people of all ages to make wiser choices? The choice is ours to make policies based on facts over fears.
When we peel back the layers on teen marijuana use amid legalization, the bottom line remains quite sticky – both literally and figuratively. Not only have fears of increased youth consumption failed to materialize, but the assumptions behind prohibition have always clung to rhetoric over reason. They persist more from their addictive power to control than any scientific validity.
The data makes it clear – our policies have long been shaped more by bias than facts regarding cannabis and youth. We allowed the spread of misinformation to perpetuate a system that treated morality as reality. We sacrificed ethical considerations for generations based on little more than hazy speculation, vested interests and saccharine myths.
In the process, how many lives and families suffered collateral damage from excessive penalties over a relatively benign substance? How many youths endured lasting impacts from a criminal record over minor possession? The projections about sending “messages” to kids proved far less credible than the harms enacted upon them in the name of protection.
And behind it all lies the bigger ethical dilemma – by what right does any authority dictate what individuals can safely consume, or deny access without just cause? At what point is it not only impractical but immoral to limit personal freedoms preemptively based on puritanical notions of societal danger? The line between protection and oppression blurred long ago.
Perhaps it’s time we reassess the balance of responsibility regarding rights related to cannabis, its risks relative to legality, and our desire to control cohorts who never asked for protection. The data shows adolescent use changes little either way. But one choice inflicts less harm on those claimed to safeguard.
As legalization marches forward, bringing transparent cannabis commerce along, we must reflect on how many of our policies still stem from reactionary worry over reason. How much of our lives remain controlled by the whims of those in power? And how the myths they peddle frequently do more damage than the vices they supposedly protect us from?
The choice of what messages we send our youth remains sticky. But clear data helps cut through the muddy logic of prohibition. Beyond fear-based talking points lies a rational discussion worth having on complex comparisons of legality versus morality.
TEEN MARIJUANA USE DROPS AFTER LEGALIZATION, READ ON…
You may like
-
Colorado shut out of marijuana rescheduling hearings by ‘biased’ DEA, filing alleges
-
Karma Koala Podcast 218: Bethany Niebauer Axia Resolutions (CO) – Cannabis Mediation As The Sector Matures
-
Puerto Rico Marijuana Jobs and Cannabis Careers
-
How to Become a Budtender in Pennsylvania
-
5 Marijuana-Infused Food Recipes You Can Make at Home
-
How to Make No Bake Edibles With Cannabutter: Easy Recipes
Cannabis News
Maintaining The Highest Level of Quality and Freshness for THCa Products
Published
21 hours agoon
January 7, 2025By
admin
When looking for food, the freshness and quality of the product are essential to the customer. Care must be taken with every product to keep its original qualities. This makes sure that customers have the best experience possible with every buy. Brands ensure their products stay potent and fresh, so to maintain they put them in airtight containers. This gives customers a premium experience that stands out in the market even if they are bought from thca flower clearance. This is especially important when it comes to cannabis goods. Keeping THC-rich flowers fresh ensures every person has a good experience that meets their needs.
The practice of storing things in air-tight containers is very helpful for maintaining their quality. These containers help keep out air, light, and wetness, which can all make the product fresh and effective over time. For people who use cannabis, how fresh the product is can have a big effect on how strong and how long the benefits last. When THC flowers are stored properly, users can expect a better experience that keeps all of the product’s benefits.
The chemicals that give weed its unique tastes and smells, don’t break down when it is stored in an airtight container. Terpenes are very important for improving the taste and making each type unique. The natural qualities of these terpenes can be kept safe by storing them in the right way. This way, every user can enjoy the full range of tastes and smells that the product has to offer.
Why airtight containers are important
Containers that don’t let air in are not only useful, they are necessary for storing things. Over the time, oxygen can break down the product’s cannabinoids and oils. When you use airtight cases, the product stays protected from the outside world. This keeps its chemical structure and makes sure it stays strong.
The users will trust the products only if they feel good about quality. Whether they are used for fun or medical reasons, THC flowers if not stored correctly may have less effect, giving a bad experience for users. To keep the level of quality, it is important to spend money on good storage methods like using airtight containers.
Make sure you have a great time
When a product has been carefully stored in the best possible ways, the experience is more powerful. Whether you are buying flowers to help you feel better or just for fun, they should always be live. With this care, users can get a product that works well like they bought the day it was packaged.
Freshness is at the heart of this process. By making sure that goods are kept in containers that keep air out, businesses can keep up the quality of the goods and make sure that customers can get the best items. Customers are happier and more likely to trust the brand to always provide better goods.
In the end, keeping the product fresh and high-quality isn’t just about keeping it safe, it is also about giving the customer a regular, good experience. Making sure that a product stays fresh and effective from the time it is packed until it gets to the customer is very important. One easy and very effective way to reach this goal is to store things in containers that keep air out. Looking at good storage methods will continue to be important for keeping the quality of THC products even as the cannabis business grows. Customers can be sure that this way of keeping things fresh and effective will make their experience better, whether they are looking for new types or taking advantage of thca flower clearance deals.
Cannabis News
Cannabis Code Enforcement Fines Must be Remedial, Not Punitive, Federal Court of Appeal Holds
Published
22 hours agoon
January 7, 2025By
admin
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal has reinstated a civil rights lawsuit against Humboldt County, California, that challenges the county’s practices in imposing punitive daily fines. It is the first time a federal appellate court has weighed in on local government’s enforcement of code violations involving cannabis farms.
The Court of Appeal decision
The decision, in Thomas v. County of Humboldt, comes after years of complaints by cannabis cultivators that local governments impose unfair fines for technical violations at licensed farms. That counties and municipalities have adopted and are enforcing large fines involving licensed properties is one of many reasons why increasing numbers of farms have given up their licenses and shut down completely or returned to the illicit market. This is hurting state efforts to bolster the legal market and suppress the illicit market for cannabis.
Lessons for industry and regulators
A takeaway from the decision is that local governments need to keep the goal of remediation in mind in establishing penalties, must be more reasonable in allowing cultivators to fix violations, and more flexible in decisions to impose fines and settling disputes. The decision should motivate county and city attorneys, and cannabis licensees and applicants, seek assistance from a mediator with expertise in the cannabis market and regulation. The courthouse might not now be as friendly a venue for local government as it has been in the past.
Most cannabis businesses that run afoul of local codes pay the penalties, no matter how unfair they might seem, because they can’t afford a long legal battle and the administrative and court processes are tilted against the property owner. Administrative hearing officers routinely uphold notices of violations and the penalties imposed by code enforcement officers. Writs of mandate brought against local government in state court, particularly in smaller counties, are extremely difficult to win.
Background on the Thomas case
What has made the Thomas case viable is that several plaintiffs banded together in a civil rights class action in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Humboldt County’s penalties for cannabis abatement violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause.
Humboldt County established a schedule of daily fines for illegal cannabis cultivation of up to $10,000, with a minimum of $6,000. Upon receiving a notice of violation from the county, the party has 10 days to abate all violations, subject to an appeals process, during which penalties continue to accrue. Violations included not just the illegal cultivation of cannabis itself, but also any other violation that facilitates illegal cultivation of cannabis. The Thomas plaintiffs contended that the county issues violation notices with hefty fines based on imprecise data (such as satellite and drone photos) and for code violations that originated with previous property owners.
The lower District Court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the plaintiffs lack legal standing, because they had not, at the time of suit, paid any penalties. But the Ninth Circuit held that the plaintiffs had concrete injuries, providing standing, because they suffered emotional distress and had incurred expenses with engineers and attorneys as they attempted to abate the alleged violations and defended themselves in hearings.
Getting to the merits of the lawsuit, the Ninth Circuit held that the plaintiffs had plausible claims under the Excessive Fines Clause because the penalties were punitive, not remedial. The Ninth Circuit agreed with the plaintiffs that the fines were unconstitutionally excessive because (1) the notices were vague, often inaccurate, or involved violations that pre-dated the plaintiffs’ occupation of their properties; (2) lesser penalties could accomplish the same health and safety goals; and (3) the alleged offenses caused no harm beyond a technical lack of compliance with the county’s permitting regulations.
Humboldt provides for an administrative appeal before a hearing officer who determines whether a violation has occurred or continues to exist. The hearing officer can only reduce the penalty for a violation in limited circumstances and cannot reduce it to less than $6,000 per day. Although the Ninth Circuit did not explicitly address it in the Thomas decision, a property owner in most circumstances also can be forced to pay the county or municipality’s abatement costs and legal expenses — including those incurred in a subsequent writ of mandate proceeding in state court. The Ninth Circuit agreed that the Thomas plaintiffs had come under:
“immense pressure to settle due to the County’s issuance of ruinous fines, . . . its undue delay in providing hearings, its denial of permits while abatements are pending, and the cost the County imposes to prove one’s innocence.”
The Ninth Circuit found that Humboldt County’s fines were “clearly punitive, not remedial as argued by the County.” The fines could reach millions of dollars, and, in the case of one plaintiff, the fines dwarfed the value of her property. The appellate court was untroubled by the involvement of cannabis, which remains unlawful under the federal Controlled Substances Act:
“[I]t seems clear to us that lesser penalties could accomplish the same health and safety goals,” and “the offenses here have caused no harm beyond a technical lack of compliance with the County’s cannabis permitting regulations.”
The Thomas plaintiffs’ strategy pays off
The Thomas plaintiffs’ strategy of going to federal court was fraught, because the court could have just as easily declined to hear the matter under the illegality doctrine, but it paid off here; the Ninth Circuit not only considered the case but also disregarded the problem of whether the plaintiffs were entitled to any remedy under federal law.
The Ninth Circuit concluded by acknowledging that local government is “often at the forefront of addressing difficult and complex issues,” but it should use “flexibility” in decision making and “cannot overstep its authority and impose fines on its citizens without paying heed to the limits posed by the Eighth Amendment.”
Note: This post was first published January 6, 2025 on the Alger ADR Blog
Cannabis News
Are Americans Shifting to Cannabis and Saying Goodbye to Cigarettes for Good?
Published
23 hours agoon
January 7, 2025By
admin
Are Americans Shifting To Weed And Saying Goodbye To Cigarettes?
We live in a time when people are more health-conscious than ever.
For the first time in history, we’re seeing a downward trend in the consumption of cigarettes, especially among young adults and adolescents. Just a few decades ago, cigarettes were considered ‘cool’. The link between cancer and cigarettes were established by the 1950’s, though accepting that cigarette smoking was “bad” for you didn’t take root socially until around the late 1990’s.
Now, we know that cigarette smoking is a dangerous, often fatal habit that leads to cancer, respiratory illnesses, and heart disease. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), over 8 million people die prematurely from tobacco use yearly.
In the results of a Gallup poll from early 2024, they found that more Americans are more likely to smoke weed than cigarettes, while young people are more than 5 times more likely to choose weed over tobacco. The poll found that 17% of Americans smoke weed, while 12% admitted to smoking cigarettes in the previous week. The more dramatic difference was observed among the 18-34 age range, where 26% admitted to consuming weed while only 5% of them still smoke cigarettes.
For the same poll, they also found that the older adults aged 55 and up were more likely to still smoke cigarettes compared to marijuana. “Americans’ reported marijuana smoking has more than doubled since 2013, when Gallup first added the question in its annual Consumption Habits survey,” explained Gallup. “That year, seven percent said they did,” they reported.
Improved Public Perceptions Leads To Healthier Choices
One can’t deny that there has been a massive shift in the increasing awareness of marijuana’s health benefits, as well as the dangers of cigarette smoking. This leads to changing public perceptions, better and more scientific research as well as clinical studies, and an improvement in the law.
The law, specifically, has been instrumental in mitigating the spread of cigarette use. For example, many governments worldwide have established strict no-smoking policies and placed a massive tax on cigarettes. Tobacco manufacturers are no longer allowed to freely advertise their product. All these have led to a downward trend in cigarette smoking habits and purchasing.
The proliferation of legal cannabis throughout North America, not just for medical use but also for recreational use has also contributed to a widespread cultural acceptance of cannabis, which has also improved the public perception of the drug. As we speak, it’s already become a part of society not just in North America but also in countries such as Thailand, several European nations, Uruguay, and Mexico to name a few.
In addition, people are also becoming more educated about the use of alcohol. While it may still be the most widely used intoxicant, its days me be numbered: there is a small yet growing number of people who are choosing to replace alcohol with weed, because of the sheer number of studies proving the dangerous link between fatal illnesses and alcohol. Not to mention that alcohol is linked to drunk driving and road fatalities, multiple different types of cancers, horrible hangovers, and so much more.
Even Gallup polls from as far back as 2022 revealed that people in the United States have already begun to smoke more weed than cigarettes. Gallup conducted the survey from July 5 through 26 of 2022. The results reveal that 11% of the population smoke cigarettes, while back in the mid-1950’s, 45% of Americans smoked them. Meanwhile, 16% of Americans reported that they smoke weed, and 48% tried it in the past. Back in 1969, just 4% of Americans smoked weed!
It’s clear that societal and cultural perceptions around both have changed dramatically. “Smoking cigarettes is on the decline and is most likely to become even more of a rarity in the years ahead,” explains Gallup Senior Scientist Dr. Frank Newport. “This reflects both public awareness of its negative effects and continuing government efforts at all levels to curtail its use,” he said.
Unfortunately, the Gallup poll also found that alcohol remains a popular substance for Americans. Despite the increasing studies being published right now that alcohol is a proven carcinogen, one can’t blame the population: it’s legal, easily accessible, and affordable for many.
Overall, it seems that the demand for wellness is slowly taking over. Wellness is no longer just a buzzword or a trend; it’s a real pursuit that more, especially young people, are seeking. And cannabis fits very well into that picture: whether CBD or THC, the components of marijuana have proven beneficial for the mental and physical health of people, across a wide age group. From pediatric CBD applications to therapeutic uses for the elderly, cannabis can be beneficial for many people.
It’s so easy to see why thousands of young adults commonly include cannabis as part of their everyday wellness regimen – the same generation that have shunned cigarette smoking for good.
Conclusion
If you really must have a smoking habit, choose weed over cigarettes. Even then, any type of weed is much healthier than tobacco. Marijuana is so much healthier for your mind and body, and it can function as a medicine and supplement as well.
For individuals who are struggling to quit smoking cigarettes, you might even want to consider using cannabis as a cessation aid. Many have found success using cannabis to quit cigarettes, with longer-lasting success rates.
CAN CANNABIS HELP YOU QUIT CIGARETTES? READ BELOW…
Colorado shut out of marijuana rescheduling hearings by ‘biased’ DEA, filing alleges
Karma Koala Podcast 218: Bethany Niebauer Axia Resolutions (CO) – Cannabis Mediation As The Sector Matures
Puerto Rico Marijuana Jobs and Cannabis Careers
How to Become a Budtender in Pennsylvania
5 Marijuana-Infused Food Recipes You Can Make at Home
How to Make No Bake Edibles With Cannabutter: Easy Recipes
Dante’s Inferno Cannabis Strain Overview
Cannabis Jobs in Australia
Unlock California Dispensary Jobs: Insider Strategies
Our 5 Favorite Uses for Cannabis Butter
Distressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™
United States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)
What you Need to Know
Drug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog
NCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program
It has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax
Cannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022
A new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse
Your Go-To Source for Cannabis Logos and Designs
UArizona launches online cannabis compliance online course
Trending
-
Cannabis News2 years ago
Distressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™
-
One-Hit Wonders2 years ago
United States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)
-
Cannabis 1012 years ago
What you Need to Know
-
drug testing1 year ago
Drug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog
-
Education2 years ago
NCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program
-
Cannabis2 years ago
It has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax
-
Marijuana Business Daily2 years ago
Cannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022
-
California2 years ago
A new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse