Connect with us

Cannabis News

The Stealth Movement to Legalize Cocaine is Gaining Traction

Published

on


legalize cocaine

Why aren’t we leveraging our weaknesses in our favor?

 

Whenever I read headlines boasting about record drug seizures at sea, I don’t feel our society is winning anything. Rather, I see us gleefully throwing away millions that could benefit the public good.

 

Take for instance the recent interdiction of $500 million worth of cocaine and marijuana seized across 13 operations in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific. Over 45,000 pounds confiscated, prevented from reaching consumer markets.

 

On the surface, authorities frame this as victory, keeping dangerous contraband off the streets. But consider the deeper implications.

 

That’s half a billion in potential tax revenue destroyed, enough to transform many lives through social programs. Instead, it’s sent literally up in smoke by prohibitionist ideology.

 

Even more ironically, the money will be wasted prosecuting and jailing the smugglers who were simply responding to customer demand. This endless game of cops and robbers squanders public funds.

Meanwhile, the cartels happily absorb the losses, comforted their immense profits remain intact. They even benefit from reduced market supply driving up prices.

 

So who really wins from this street value headline spree? Because it sure isn’t harm reduction or public interest.

 

Just imagine if we exploited our vices intelligently, regulating and taxing drugs to fund communities instead of criminals.

 

Those massive piles of seized powder could finance schools, rehabilitation, housing, healthcare, and youth programs. Addiction could be treated holistically.

 

We could even explore reparations for marginalized communities devastated by the war on drugs. The possibilities are immense.

 

But under prohibition, that utopian potential gets torpedoed and sent literally down the drain. When will we stop burning money and wasting human lives to target our own shadow? The system makes no sense.

 

Our weakness is ignorance of history, clinging to puritan myths about human nature.

 

Cannabis.net uncovered this movement at the Benzinga Cannabis Conference in Miami with an article entitled, “Cash Is King, Use Your Data, and Go Sell Legal Cocaine in Canada”.

 

 

Let’s break down what positive purposes $500 million in taxed drug revenue could serve our society, instead of literally going down the drain through seizures. That massive stack of contraband cash equates to immense potential public good.

 

For starters, it could provide 10,000 affordable housing units across the country, helping address chronic homelessness. No more veterans sleeping under highways or families on the edge of eviction. Stability for thousands.

 

Or we could fully revitalize multiple impoverished neighborhoods by investing in new infrastructure, schools, healthcare clinics, youth programs, green spaces and local businesses. Communities would transform from desperation to prosperity.

 

Imagine too if those funds went directly into drug rehabilitation, abuse prevention and mental health resources. We could support thousands getting clean while researching holistic alternatives to incarceration and empowering healthy communities.

 

That $500 million could also cover free community college tuition for 50,000 students. Imagine how many more would pursue higher education and well-paying careers without the burden of student debt. Knowledge shouldn’t be exclusive.

 

We could even dedicate $100 million towards direct monthly payments to single parents or caregivers to ease financial stresses. Parents already work harder than anyone. Let’s give them a hand up, not judgment.

 

Or consider medical applications. Half a billion could provide cancer treatment for 50,000 patients unable to afford it otherwise. The most vulnerable shouldn’t face death because of income. We have the resources in abundance.

 

The list is endless. Infrastructure, hospitals, green energy projects, small business grants, you name it. Almost any public need could be better served by regulated drug taxes than what the DEA is doing.

Clearly our society suffers not from a lack of funds but of imagination and compassion around using it wisely. We keep digging the hole of drug war waste deeper wondering why things don’t improve.

But the solutions are right there in front of us, if we muster the courage. End the charade of zero-tolerance. Embrace pragmatic harm reduction. Let human needs guide policy, not puritanical myths about eradicating desire.

 

The choice comes down to wasting more money destroying lives, or using that wealth intelligently to lift up lives. Our shared wellbeing hangs in the balance. 50 years of drug war has only bred more suffering. Isn’t it time we tried a society based on healing not punishment?

 

 

It’s true, drugs definitely have the potential to ruin lives when misused. But our policies around permitted substances versus banned ones reveals glaring hypocrisies.

Alcohol, for instance, kills over 95,000 Americans annually through health complications and drunk driving accidents. Tobacco claims over 400,000 lives a year via cancer, lung disease and other ailments.

Yet these two legal drugs account for more deaths than all illicit drugs combined – including notorious “hard drugs” like heroin and cocaine. Alcohol causes more societal harm through violence and addiction than any illegal substance.

 

The numbers don’t lie. CDC data shows alcohol contributes to around 11 million violent crimes annually, including murder, rape and domestic abuse. Meanwhile FDA-approved pharmaceutical opioids claim tens of thousands of lives in the overdose epidemic.

 

Clearly legality is no measure of a drug’s potential for harm. In many cases, the most dangerous substances on both a personal and societal level are sold over the counter.

 

So why do we accept such glaring double standards around certain drugs? What makes alcohol and tobacco intrinsically safer than cannabis, LSD or psilocybin – which have never caused a lethal overdose?

The answer lies less in pharmacology than morality. Our drug prohibitions derive more from political agendas and ingrained cultural bias than any scientific risk assessment.

 

Critics argue banning drugs is necessary because some individuals may ruin their lives. But this blanket justification could apply equally to cheeseburgers or skydiving or any number of potentially harmful but legally permitted activities we sensibly regulate for public safety.

 

A health-first approach recognizes adult freedoms while mitigating harm through education and support resources. It funds rehabilitation through reasonable vice taxes rather than jailing non-violent users.

We don’t have to ban peanuts outright because some children are allergic. Nor should we undermine civil liberties over puritanical notions of eliminating consensual adult activity with some potential downsides.

 

In a truly just society, policies arise from compassion not fear or judgment. We can deter harmful drug use through pragmatic health policies while respecting liberties. It simply requires shedding lingering prohibitive mentalities not grounded in facts.

 

Because the evidence shows virtually all drugs, like any substance, carry some risks and benefits depending on context. Blanket bans based on outdated cultural bias make no sense. A nuanced public health framework allows maximizing benefits while providing help to those who need it.

 

 

That $500 million drug seizure was just a fraction of the total US illicit drug profits we allow cartels to keep every year. The combined domestic market across all illegal drugs rakes in around $100-150 billion annually.

 

Let’s take the lowest estimate of $100 billion. Here’s just some of what we could fund if that black market operated above board and paid reasonable vice taxes:

 

  • 20 billion towards drug rehabilitation programs, sober living facilities, mental health services, and community support. Helping those who need it most.

  • 20 billion to community colleges and trade schools for free vocational training and higher education access. Investing in the next generation.

  • 10 billion in grants for community projects like youth programs, food banks, battered women shelters, art spaces and more. Supporting vibrant, nurturing neighborhoods.

  • 10 billion to house every homeless veteran and low-income family currently on the streets, because no one should face such indignity in a wealthy nation.

  • 10 billion in small business grants for entrepreneurs from marginalized communities to spur economic mobility. Expanding opportunities.

  • 10 billion for infrastructure upgrades to roads, broadband internet, green energy projects and public transit. Building toward the future.

  • 5 billion in direct aid to single parents and caregivers struggling with childcare costs and unpaid labor. Recognizing their value.

  • 5 billion for universal healthcare programs and subsidies for life-saving medications like insulin. Health is a fundamental right.

 

And this is just a fraction of what we could accomplish by regulating instead of prohibiting. We haven’t even touched large investments in schools, hospitals, nutrition programs, parks, conservation, scientific research and more. The possibilities are endless.

 

Yet we currently forfeit all this social potential by clinging to a failed criminalization model that causes more harm than any drug. Our choice fuels violent cartels when it could uplift our own communities.

 

Over $50 billion gets spent annually on drug law enforcement with little effect on supply or demand. But just a fraction of the overall market’s tax revenues could transform millions of lives for the better.

 

At a certain point we must confront reality – prohibition is an irrational policy failing by any metric.

 

 

The tide is clearly turning towards cannabis legalization in America, as evidenced by successive states adopting more enlightened policies even amidst federal foot-dragging. This momentum is encouraging.

However, the bigger issue remains dismantling prohibition across the board. As long as any consensual substances remain arbitrarily criminalized, excessive harms and wasted opportunity will persist.

 

Cannabis legalization is an important first step. But policy reform must not stop there. Entheogens, cocaine, opioids, and other demonized chemicals should be guided by humane pragmatism, not the antiquated absolutism of the drug war.

 

Because the core calculus remains – we currently forfeit at least $100 billion in potential annual revenue from regulated adult drug markets. Money that could uplift our communities through schools, healthcare, housing and more.

 

Yet we cling to a puritanical “zero-tolerance” ideology that only worsens problems. Over $50 billion gets spent annually on drug law enforcement, for negligible impact on supply or demand. Our own shadow remains unaddressed.

 

Does it make sense to keep wasting billions disrupting consenting adult activities that will never disappear? Especially when we could be generating wealth to help people and repair the damage from systemic oppression?

 

The drug war serves to prop up the corporate monopolies of Big Pharma, for-profit prisons, corrupt police unions, and the shadowy DEA itself. It must end for society’s greater good.

But change begins in our minds. We must shed the remnants of Reefer Madness propaganda and perceive drug regulation through the lens of pragmatic humanism, not dogma and fear.

 

Addiction and abuse can be better addressed through healthcare and education than handcuffs and intolerance. And responsible adult freedoms need not be constrained because some statistically will misuse them. Such is the nature of liberty.

 

The sticky bottom line is that prohibition is philosophically and economically irrational. Its cruelties serve only to divide society against itself. But pragmatic harm reduction fosters compassion, community, and optimal outcomes based on human needs.

 

The money and solutions are there when we muster courage. All that’s missing is the awakening to evolve past our own hypocrisies. But as old ways crumble, a more beautiful world unfolds.

 

THE MOVEMENT TO LEGALIZE COCAINE, READ ON…

legalize cocaine in america and canada

IS THE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE WAR ON DRUGS LEGALIZING COKE?



Source link

Cannabis News

What Do Christian Conservatives Have Against Cannabis?

Published

on

By


christian conservatives on weed

The green wave continues to sweep across America, folks. This year, we’re set to see even more states embrace the sweet leaf of liberty. But for some, this isn’t cause for celebration – it’s a reason to clutch their pearls and sound the alarm bells.

Now, I’ll be the first to admit that cannabis legalization isn’t all sunshine and rainbows. Like any major policy shift, it comes with its fair share of challenges. But here’s the kicker: those doomsday scenarios that prohibitionists love to paint? They rarely, if ever, come to pass.

In my years of covering cannabis culture and policy, I’ve seen more Reefer Madness redux than I care to count. But I’ve also witnessed the transformative power of legalization – from economic boosts to criminal justice reform. So today, I’m going to lay it all out for you, the good, the bad, and the dank.

I’ve dug up an op-ed from our friends over at the Christian Post. It’s a veritable greatest hits album of anti-cannabis talking points. We’re talking highway carnage, brain-damaged youth, and even Chinese communist pot farms! It’s like they’re playing prohibition bingo, and they’ve got a full card.

But for every point they raise, there’s a counterpoint they conveniently ignore. The hidden benefits of legalization are numerous, from tax revenue that funds schools to reduced racial disparities in arrests. It’s high time we put these arguments side by side and see which ones hold water.

So, strap in, dear readers. We’re about to embark on a journey through the pros and cons of cannabis legalization. My aim? To show you that when we weigh the evidence, the scales tip decisively in favor of legalization. It’s not about creating a perfect world – it’s about crafting better policies based on facts, not fear.

Let’s light this joint and get to it!

Alright, let’s dive into the murky waters of prohibition propaganda and unpack this Christian Post op-ed. Grab your waders, folks – it’s about to get deep.

  1. Highway Havoc: Our fearmongers-in-chief kick things off with the classic “stoned drivers will turn our roads into demolition derbies” argument. They cite increased accidents and fatalities in states that have legalized. It’s a concern that plays on our natural fear for safety, especially when it comes to our roads. They’re banking on the image of glassy-eyed potheads weaving through traffic to scare voters.

  2. ER Overload: Next up, they’re painting a picture of emergency rooms overflowing with overdosed kids and adults. The specter of children accidentally munching on cannabis edibles is a powerful one. It taps into our protective instincts and makes legalization seem irresponsible. They’re conveniently ignoring the fact that many household items pose similar risks.

  3. Crime Wave: Ah, the old “legalization will attract drug lords” chestnut. They argue that the black market will undercut legal prices, leading to more serious crime. It’s a clever twist – admit that petty possession arrests will decrease, but claim violent crime will rise. This plays on fears of community degradation and public safety.

  4. Think of the Children: The “brain damage to developing minds” argument is a potent one. It leverages our societal commitment to protecting youth and education. By framing cannabis as a threat to our children’s future, they’re attempting to create a moral imperative against legalization.

  5. Farewell, Farms: The claim that cannabis will replace food crops is an interesting one. It taps into anxieties about food security and changing rural landscapes. There’s a hint of nostalgia here – a longing for a simpler, pre-legalization America.

  6. Tax Trap: They argue that increased tax revenue will mainly fund new government programs dealing with addiction and safety issues. This is a classic conservative argument against expansion of government services. It’s meant to appeal to small-government advocates.

  7. Gateway Ganja: The old gateway drug theory makes an appearance. They’re suggesting that legal cannabis will lead to increased use of harder drugs. This argument has been around since the Reefer Madness days, playing on fears of a slippery slope to harder drug use.

  8. Impaired Workforce: There’s mention of employees showing up to work high, tapping into concerns about productivity and workplace safety. It’s an appeal to business owners and those worried about economic impacts.

  9. Homelessness Surge: They paint a picture of beautiful cities overrun by homeless drug addicts. This plays on fears of urban decay and social disorder. It’s a powerful image that taps into class anxieties and concerns about community aesthetics.

  10. Foreign Influence: The specter of Chinese-funded pot farms is raised, combining drug fears with xenophobia and national security concerns. It’s a clever way to tie cannabis to broader geopolitical anxieties.

  11. Youth at Risk: There’s heavy emphasis on how cannabis affects developing brains, citing addiction risks and cognitive impairments. This is perhaps their strongest emotional appeal, leveraging our collective desire to protect the next generation.

  12. Globalist Conspiracy: They even throw in a dash of conspiracy theory, suggesting that “globalist elites” want a drugged-up populace that’s easier to control. This appeals to those who distrust big government and international organizations.

  13. Misused Tax Dollars: Finally, they argue that cannabis tax revenue doesn’t benefit the general public, but instead goes to managing the problems created by legalization. This is meant to undercut one of the strongest pro-legalization arguments.

Throughout the piece, the authors are painting a dystopian picture of post-legalization America. They’re leveraging every fear and anxiety they can to make cannabis seem like an existential threat to our way of life. It’s a masterclass in prohibitionist propaganda, designed to appeal to conservative values and parental concerns.

But here’s the kicker – most of these arguments fall apart under scrutiny or are based on cherry-picked data. They’re relying on fear rather than facts, emotion rather than evidence. It’s high time we puff, puff, passed on these outdated arguments and looked at the real impacts of legalization.

When we peel back the layers of fear-mongering and look at the cold, hard facts, the benefits of cannabis legalization become as clear as a freshly cleaned bong. Let’s break it down, shall we?

First off, let’s address the elephant in the room – or should I say, the stoned driver behind the wheel? While some studies claim a spike in traffic fatalities post-legalization, they’re missing a crucial element: context. As our friends at NORML pointed out, when you compare legalization states to control states, the picture changes dramatically. In fact, traffic deaths fell by an average of 12% in the three years following legalization in states like California and Massachusetts. Meanwhile, control states saw a 2% increase. It seems the only thing going up in smoke is this particular prohibitionist argument.

Now, let’s talk about who really loses when we legalize – and it ain’t the average Joe. It’s the cartels, baby! In Mexico, the price per kilo of cannabis dropped by a whopping 90% after legalization efforts in the U.S. That’s not just a dent in their profits; it’s a gaping hole. We’re literally stealing money from the bad guys and putting it into legitimate businesses. Speaking of which, employment is up in the cannabis industry. We’re creating jobs, not joint-rolling vagrants.

But wait, there’s more! Opioid deaths are down in states with medical cannabis markets. Big Pharma is losing about $10 billion a year in these states. Forgive me if I don’t shed a tear for the poor pharmaceutical executives who can’t afford a third yacht this year.

Let’s not forget the human cost of prohibition. Fewer people are being jailed for cannabis offenses, saving states millions in incarceration costs. And those who do partake? They’re taking fewer sick days, boosting productivity. They’re also generally slimmer than non-users, with lower BMIs. In a country where obesity-related illnesses cost billions, that’s nothing to sneeze at.

Worried about the kids? Don’t be. There’s a general trend of youth consuming less cannabis in legal states. It turns out, taking away the forbidden fruit appeal makes it less tempting. Who knew?

And let’s talk money, honey. States are generating revenue from something that used to be a total loss. Even if the numbers aren’t sky-high, it’s infinitely better than the net loss from prohibition enforcement and missed tax opportunities.

For medical patients, cannabis is a godsend. From pain management to PTSD treatment, it’s improving lives daily. And let’s not overlook the fundamental issue of bodily autonomy. By legalizing cannabis, we’re giving adults back control over their own bodies and minds.

This is just scratching the surface, folks. The benefits of legalization are as numerous as the strains at your local dispensary. When we weigh the pros and cons, it’s clear that the scales tip heavily in favor of legalization.

It’s high time we embraced a more rational, evidence-based approach to cannabis policy. The war on drugs has been a costly failure. Legalization, on the other hand, is proving to be a win-win situation for public health, safety, and the economy.

So let’s put aside the reefer madness and focus on the reefer gladness. The grass is indeed greener on the legal side!

 

CONSERVATIVES ON CANNABIS, READ ON…

CONSERVATIVES REGULATE CANNABIS

WHEN CONSERVATIVES REGULATE CANNABIS, 10% CAPS ON PRODUCTS!



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Creatine for Muscle Growth, But What About Creatine for Your Cannabis Plants and Soil?

Published

on

By


creatine for cannabis plants

Introduction

The question of whether to use creatine as a supplement for cannabis plants has piqued the interest of many growers, as creatine is primarily known for enhancing muscle performance and recovery in athletes. However, its potential application in horticulture, particularly for cannabis cultivation, warrants a deeper exploration. While some growers speculate that creatine’s nutrient composition, which includes nitrogen essential for plant growth, could benefit cannabis plants by promoting better growth and overall health, and that it may help plants cope with stress by enhancing their metabolic processes, leading to increased resilience and improved growth under challenging conditions, there is a significant lack of scientific research specifically addressing the effects of creatine on cannabis plants. Most claims regarding its efficacy are anecdotal and lack empirical support, and using creatine in excessive amounts could lead to negative consequences, such as disrupting soil chemistry, leading to nutrient imbalances and potentially harming plant health. If experimenting with creatine, it is crucial to start with a diluted solution, monitor plant health closely, and ensure that it complements a balanced nutrient regimen, as personal experience and careful observation will be key to determining its effectiveness in cannabis cultivation.Understanding Creatine…

 

 What is Creatine?

Creatine is a naturally occurring compound classified as a nitrogenous organic acid that plays a crucial role in energy metabolism, particularly in muscle cells. Its primary function is to facilitate the regeneration of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which serves as the primary energy currency within cells. While creatine is predominantly found in animal-based food sources such as red meat and fish, it can also be synthesized endogenously in the human body from a combination of amino acids, including arginine, glycine, and methionine. This ability to be produced internally, along with its presence in certain dietary sources, contributes to creatine’s importance in maintaining cellular energy levels and supporting overall physiological functions, especially in tissues with high energy demands like skeletal muscles.

Forms of Creatine

 

Creatine is available in several forms, including:

  • Creatine Monohydrate: The most common and researched form, known for its effectiveness and affordability.

  • Creatine Ethyl Ester: A form that is claimed to be more easily absorbed but lacks substantial research backing.

  • Buffered Creatine: Designed to reduce the acidity of creatine, potentially improving its stability and absorption.

 

Potential Benefits of Using Creatine for Cannabis Plants

 

 1. Enhanced Energy Production

 

One of the primary functions of creatine is to facilitate energy production. In plants, energy is crucial for various processes, including photosynthesis, nutrient uptake, and growth. Some growers hypothesize that introducing creatine could enhance these energy-dependent processes, leading to more vigorous growth.

 

2. Nutrient Absorption

 

Creatine contains nitrogen, a vital nutrient for plants. Nitrogen is essential for the synthesis of amino acids, proteins, and chlorophyll, all of which are critical for healthy plant development. Some anecdotal evidence suggests that creatine may improve nutrient absorption in cannabis plants, potentially leading to better growth and yields.

 

 3. Stress Resistance

 

Cannabis plants can experience various forms of stress, including drought, nutrient deficiency, and pest attacks. Some proponents of creatine use argue that it may help plants cope with stress by enhancing their overall vitality and resilience. This could be particularly beneficial during critical growth phases or when plants are exposed to challenging environmental conditions.

 

 4. Improved Root Development

 

Healthy root systems are crucial for nutrient and water uptake. Some growers believe that creatine may promote root growth and development, leading to a stronger foundation for the plant. A robust root system can enhance the plant’s ability to absorb nutrients and water, ultimately contributing to better overall health.

 

 Concerns and Limitations

 

 1. Lack of Scientific Research

 

While there are numerous anecdotal reports regarding the benefits of using creatine for cannabis plants, scientific research on this topic is limited. Most claims are based on personal experiences rather than controlled studies. As a result, the effectiveness and safety of using creatine in cannabis cultivation remain largely unverified.

 

2. Potential Risks of Overuse

 

Using creatine in excessive amounts could lead to negative effects on cannabis plants. Over-saturation may cause water retention, potentially leading to root rot or other issues associated with overwatering. It is essential to approach any supplementation cautiously and monitor plant health closely.

 

3. Soil pH Concerns

 

Creatine may affect soil pH levels, which can impact nutrient availability and uptake. Cannabis plants thrive in a specific pH range (typically between 6.0 and 7.0 for soil). If creatine alters the pH significantly, it could lead to nutrient lockout or deficiencies, adversely affecting plant health.

 

4. Compatibility with Other Nutrients

 

Creatine’s interaction with other nutrients and fertilizers is not well understood. When introducing any new supplement, it is essential to consider how it might affect the overall nutrient balance in the soil. Compatibility issues could lead to nutrient imbalances, negatively impacting plant health and growth.

 

 Practical Considerations for Using Creatine

 

 1. Dosage and Application

 

If you decide to experiment with creatine, start with a diluted solution. A common approach is to mix a small amount of creatine monohydrate with water and apply it as a foliar spray or soil drench. Begin with a low concentration to observe how the plants respond before increasing the dosage.

 2. Monitoring Plant Health

 

Closely monitor your plants after introducing creatine. Look for signs of improvement, such as increased growth rates, healthier leaves, and robust root systems. Conversely, be vigilant for any negative effects, such as wilting, yellowing leaves, or signs of stress.

 

 3. Combining with Other Nutrients

 

Consider using creatine in conjunction with a balanced nutrient regimen. Ensure that your plants receive adequate macronutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium) and micronutrients (calcium, magnesium, iron) to support overall health. Creatine should not replace essential nutrients but rather complement them.

 

4. Timing of Application

 

Timing is crucial when applying any supplement. Consider using creatine during the vegetative stage when plants are actively growing and require more energy and nutrients. Avoid using it during flowering, as this stage has different nutrient needs and may be more sensitive to changes in the growing environment.

 

Conclusion

 

While the idea of using creatine as a supplement for cannabis plants is intriguing, it is essential to approach this practice with caution. The potential benefits, such as enhanced energy production, improved nutrient absorption, and stress resistance, are largely based on anecdotal evidence rather than scientific research. If you choose to experiment with creatine, start with small doses, monitor plant health closely, and ensure that it complements a balanced nutrient regimen. As with any cultivation practice, what works for one grower may not work for another, so personal experience and careful observation will be key to determining the effectiveness of creatine in your cannabis growing endeavors.

 

GROWING AT HOME, READ ON…

HOME GROW CHECKLIST

HOME GROW CANNABIS CHECLIST BEFORE YOU PLANT A SEED!



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

AARP Dipsensary Discounts? – Cannabis Use by Older Americans Has Doubled in Just the Last 36 Months Alone

Published

on

By


aarp on cannabis

Marijuana usage among older persons in the United States has nearly quadrupled over the past three years, according to a new research supported by AARP. Numerous users claim benefiting from cannabis use in pain management, sleep enhancement, mental health enhancement, and other areas.

 

More than one in five Americans 50 years of age and older reported using marijuana at least once in the previous year, according to a University of Michigan poll. Over one-tenth said they used it on a monthly basis. According to research, the number of older persons using cannabis will continue to rise as more states legalize it.

 

Of those who had used marijuana in the previous year, 81% stated they did so to relax, 68% to assist sleep, and 64% because they loved the experience. Furthermore, 63% utilized cannabis for pain treatment, with 53% using it to improve their mental wellness.

 

According to the AARP, 21% of Americans over the age of 50 currently use marijuana, nearly double the 12% reported in the previous 2021 poll.

 

According to the most recent data, 12% reported using cannabis at least monthly, 9% weekly, and 5% daily.

 

The poll also discovered that those aged 50 to 64, those in poorer health, and those from lower-income families were more likely to consume cannabis on a regular basis. In Michigan, where adult cannabis usage became legal in December 2019, consumption rates were even higher: 27% reported using it in the previous year, 14% weekly, and 9% daily or almost daily.

 

The Michigan Poll on Healthy Aging, which surveyed 1,079 Michigan residents and 3,012 people from other states, focused specifically on THC-containing products. The report’s authors emphasize the importance of further cannabis education.

 

Motivations Behind Cannabis Use Among Older Adults: A Growing Trend

 

According to the survey, adults aged 50 and older are turning to cannabis for various reasons, including:

– Relaxation (81%)

– Help with sleep (68%)

– Enjoying the effects/feeling good (64%)

– Pain relief (63%)

– Mental health or mood support (53%)

– Treating a medical condition (40%)

– Enhancing social gatherings/connecting with others (31%)

– Celebrating (26%)

– Experimenting (18%)

 

“As cannabis becomes legal, more people are using it, but we don’t yet have enough information to address crucial issues like, are there safe methods to consume it? Are there any suggested guidelines?” Bonar is a psychiatry professor at Michigan Medicine. “So, seeing these numbers rise without solid scientific data to guide people’s decisions is a bit concerning.”

 

The AARP-funded study concentrated on cannabis products containing THC, the psychoactive component that produces the “high.” This varies from CBD products, which are popular among older folks but contain just minimal quantities of THC.

 

Among regular cannabis users—those consuming at least monthly—56% said they had discussed their cannabis use with a healthcare provider, and nearly 79% believed that today’s marijuana is stronger than in previous decades.

 

However, Bonar pointed out that this means 21% of older adults might not realize THC levels have increased since the 1990s. She also noted that while 72% of people believe cannabis can be addictive, over a quarter remain skeptical.

 

The poll’s lead researcher, Jeffrey Kullgren, an internal medicine professor at the University of Michigan and a doctor at the Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, emphasized the significance of addressing cannabis usage with healthcare practitioners. He noted that these discussions can aid in detecting potential medication interactions or symptoms of problematic use.

 

Cannabis as a Rising Alternative to Alcohol: Impact on Consumer Choices

 

According to a Bloomberg report earlier this month, the continued legalization of cannabis poses a “significant threat” to the alcohol industry as more people choose to use it instead of alcohol. The report predicted that this could “indefinitely” prolong the decline in wine and spirits sales.

 

In a research published late last year, a global investment bank mirrored these views, claiming that marijuana had developed into a “formidable competitor” with alcohol. Over the following five years, they predicted that the number of regular cannabis users will increase by roughly 20 million, while the number of alcohol users may decline by a few million. According to the research, as additional states legalize marijuana, sales of the drug might reach $37 billion in the United States by 2027.

 

Another research from Canada, where marijuana is allowed on a federal level, indicated a correlation between legalization and a decline in beer sales, suggesting that cannabis and alcohol are substituting for one another.

 

These results are consistent with recent polls regarding Americans’ perceptions of marijuana in relation to alcohol. According to a Gallup poll conducted last month, people believe cannabis to be less dangerous than nicotine-containing vape pens, alcohol, and tobacco. In addition, adult cannabis users have surpassed cigarette users in number.

 

According to a different survey conducted in June of last year by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and Morning Consult, Americans view marijuana as much less harmful than alcohol, cigarettes, and opioids, and they also think it’s less addictive than technology.

 

A different survey conducted in July found that more Americans use marijuana daily than consume alcohol. Additionally, compared to cannabis users, alcohol users are more likely to think that cutting back on their usage would be beneficial.

 

Comparably, a May research that appeared in the journal *Addiction* discovered that more American adults now use marijuana on a regular basis than do people who use alcohol.

 

Bottom Line

 

According to a new AARP research, marijuana usage among older Americans has nearly quadrupled in the last three years, with more than 21% of persons aged 50 and over currently smoking cannabis. Key benefits include pain reduction, sleep help, relaxation, and mental health support. As additional states legalize marijuana, this tendency is projected to continue, particularly among individuals aged 50 to 64. Furthermore, cannabis is widely perceived as an alternative to alcohol, with many users preferring it to drinking, potentially impacting alcohol sales. With marijuana becoming more socially acceptable, healthcare practitioners and regulators must address the absence of clear rules for safe usage, especially as cannabis products become stronger and more readily available.

 

MARIJUANA PUSHES OFF RETIREMENT? READ ON…

MARIJUANA KEEPS SENIORS WORKING

MARIJUANA IS KEEPING SENIORS IN THE WORKFORCE LONGER?



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media