Connect with us

Cannabis News

The US is Waging a Silent War on Cannabis Moms

Published

on


moms who use cannabis are under attack

The US’ silent war on Cannabis Mothers

The War on Drugs, that grand American experiment in prohibition and punishment, has left a trail of destruction in its wake that’s hard to fathom. For over half a century, this misguided crusade has torn families apart, filled prisons to bursting, and shattered countless lives. The numbers are staggering – millions incarcerated, families left in financial ruin, and communities decimated. And for what? A war that has failed to stem the tide of drug use or addiction, instead criminalizing health issues and personal choices.

But the casualties of this war aren’t spread evenly across society. Oh no, that would be too fair. Instead, it’s minority communities and the poor who’ve borne the brunt of this assault on personal freedom. The scales of justice, it seems, are tipped heavily against those with the wrong skin color or too little cash in their pockets.

Yet amidst all this well-documented carnage, there’s a silent battle being waged that few are talking about. It’s a war on mothers, fought through the insidious weaponization of Child Protective Services. Even in states where cannabis has been legalized, moms are finding themselves in the crosshairs, their children torn from their arms over a joint or an edible.

It’s a twisted irony – in a country where wine mom culture is celebrated and kids are medicated for ADHD at the drop of a hat, a mom who uses cannabis to unwind or manage chronic pain can lose everything. The same system that’s supposed to protect children is being used to traumatize them, all in the name of a plant that’s less harmful than alcohol.

In this article, we’re going to peel back the curtain on this hidden front of the War on Drugs. We’ll explore how overzealous policies and outdated stigmas are destroying families and harming the very children they claim to protect. It’s time to shine a light on this cruel and unnecessary aspect of cannabis prohibition – a reminder that even as legalization spreads, the tentacles of the War on Drugs continue to squeeze the life out of American families.

I recently dove into a deeply disturbing Rolling Stone article that shed light on a hidden front of the War on Drugs – the targeting of cannabis-using mothers. It’s a long, gut-wrenching piece, but I’ll try to distill some of the key points here. Fair warning, folks – this isn’t a feel-good story.

Let’s start with Doshia Givens, a single mom in Cleveland. After a horrific car accident left her in crippling pain, she opted for cannabis instead of addictive opioids to manage her suffering. Sounds reasonable, right? Well, Child Protective Services didn’t think so. When her daughter Selah tested positive for THC after a routine hospital visit, Doshia was deemed an “imminent risk” to her child. Within 24 hours, they were torn apart. All because a mother chose a safer pain management option in a state drowning in opioid deaths.

Then there’s Raneisha Hubbert in Los Angeles. Her crime? Testing positive for marijuana after her mischievous toddler kept escaping their new apartment. Despite no evidence of neglect or harm to her children, both kids were taken away. The system labeled her a “substance abuser” unfit to care for her own flesh and blood.

But surely this doesn’t happen in states where weed is legal, right? Wrong. Take Lindsay Ridgell from Arizona, where medical marijuana has been legal since 2010. She used cannabis during pregnancy to combat severe morning sickness, with her doctor’s blessing. Yet when her son was born, he was drug tested without her consent, and she found herself under investigation for neglect. This, despite Arizona’s laws specifically protecting medical marijuana users from such discrimination.

These aren’t isolated incidents. The article reveals that tens of thousands of mothers across the country are coming under scrutiny for cannabis use. Many lose custody entirely, labeled as dangers to their own children. They’re forced into drug treatment programs and subjected to humiliating surveillance, all for using a substance that’s legal in many states and less harmful than alcohol.

Which begs the question – how is this good for the children? Where’s the harm in a parent using cannabis responsibly, especially compared to the known dangers of separation trauma? We don’t see this kind of heavy-handed intervention when parents drink alcohol, or feed their kids a steady diet of processed junk food and sugar. Hell, we celebrate “wine mom” culture while demonizing cannabis-using mothers.

The hypocrisy is staggering. These policies aren’t protecting kids; they’re traumatizing them. Ripping a child from a loving home over a parent’s cannabis use isn’t child protection – it’s state-sanctioned child abuse. And it’s happening right under our noses, even as we pat ourselves on the back for progressing beyond the worst excesses of the War on Drugs.

It’s high time we faced this ugly truth: our child welfare system is being weaponized to continue the War on Drugs by other means. And it’s our kids who are paying the price.

 

 

Let’s cut through the bullshit and call this what it is: state-sanctioned child abuse masquerading as protection. The system labels cannabis-using mothers as “substance abusers” and “dangers” to their children. Their solution? Rip kids from their homes and toss them into a foster care system that’s about as nurturing as a cactus in winter.

Now, I’m not advocating for parents to blaze up 24/7 while neglecting their rugrats. But let’s get real about the trauma we’re inflicting on these kids in the name of “protecting” them. Being separated from your parents, especially during those crucial formative years, isn’t just a bummer – it’s potentially life-altering in the worst way possible.

The stats on kids who grow up without their parents or in foster care are downright depressing. Higher rates of mental health issues, substance abuse problems, and incarceration. Lower educational attainment and income levels. Increased risk of homelessness and early pregnancy. It’s a laundry list of societal ills that we’re essentially programming into these kids’ futures.

So, what’s worse? A mom who unwinds with a joint after the kids are in bed, or subjecting a child to a system that dramatically increases their chances of ending up depressed, addicted, or in prison?

Let’s flip the script for a second. Is a cannabis mom really such a horror show? We’re talking about people who love, nurture, and care for their kids. They clean scraped knees, cook meals, help with homework, and provide the emotional security that’s crucial for healthy development. Does the fact that they use cannabis suddenly negate all of that? Does it make them unfit for motherhood?

Hell no. In fact, recent research suggests that cannabis-using parents might actually be more engaged with their kids. They’re more likely to get down on the floor and play, to immerse themselves in their children’s worlds. That kind of interaction is gold for a developing brain.

But the law, in its infinite, scientifically illiterate wisdom, doesn’t see any of this nuance. It sees “drug user” and immediately equates that with “unfit parent.” Never mind the trauma inflicted on the child. Never mind the loving home destroyed. The War on Drugs demands its pound of flesh, and it’s our kids who are paying the price.

Is this really the society we want to live in? One where the state can snatch your children because you chose to consume a plant that’s less harmful than alcohol? Where families are torn apart not because of abuse or neglect, but because of outdated, hysterical drug policies?

We need to ask ourselves: Is the cost of this aspect of the War on Drugs higher than any perceived harm from cannabis use? Are we okay with traumatizing children to punish parents for a victimless crime? Because make no mistake, that’s exactly what we’re doing.

It’s time to wake up and smell the cannabis, folks. This isn’t about protecting kids. It’s about perpetuating a failed war that’s destroying lives and families. We need to demand better. We need policies based on science and compassion, not fear and stigma. Because right now, we’re not protecting children – we’re sacrificing them on the altar of prohibition. And that’s a cost that’s far too high to bear.

Alright, folks, it’s time to cut through the haze and face some hard truths. The War on Drugs has been ravaging our society for over half a century now. Isn’t it about damn time we admit this experiment in prohibition has failed spectacularly? We’re supposed to be living in an age of big data and evidence-based policy, yet here we are, still clinging to these draconian, uninformed drug laws like they’re some kind of security blanket.

Let’s talk hypocrisy for a second. We’ve got politicians and policymakers waxing poetic about protecting the children, using them as rhetorical shields in their crusade against drugs. But when it comes down to it, they’re more than happy to rip kids away from loving homes over a parent’s cannabis use. Tell me, how exactly is traumatizing a child by separating them from their family protecting them? It’s like trying to fireproof a house by burning it to the ground.

I don’t know about you, but I think it’s high time (pun fully intended) that we renegotiate our relationship with drugs from a policy perspective. We’re not the same society we were back in 1971 when Nixon kicked off this ill-fated war. We’ve evolved, we’ve learned, and we’ve seen firsthand the catastrophic consequences of treating a public health issue like a criminal one.

Using the full force of the law, including the child welfare system, to crack down on cannabis use is like using a sledgehammer to hang a picture frame. It’s excessive, it’s destructive, and it completely misses the point. We need policies that actually help families, not tear them apart. Policies based on science and compassion, not outdated moral panics and political posturing.

So here’s the sticky bottom line: It’s time to end this senseless war. It’s time to stop punishing parents for using a substance that’s legal in many states and less harmful than alcohol. It’s time to prioritize the real well-being of children over some misguided notion of drug-free purity.

Because let’s face it, the real danger to these kids isn’t a parent who uses cannabis responsibly. It’s a system that’s willing to traumatize them in the name of a failed ideology. And that’s a habit we need to kick, once and for all.

 

SOCCER MOMS AND WEED, READ ON…

CONFESSION OF A STONED SOCCER MOM

CONFESSIONS OF A STONED SUBURBAN SOCCER MOM!



Source link

Cannabis News

Latest Trump Weed Rumor – Trump Will Federally Deschedule and Decriminalize Cannabis, but Not Legalize It

Published

on

By


trump on marijuana reform

In a recent interview, former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie made headlines by asserting that President-elect Donald Trump will pursue significant reforms in federal policies regarding marijuana and cryptocurrency. As the nation grapples with evolving attitudes toward cannabis and the burgeoning digital currency market, Christie’s predictions have ignited discussions about the potential implications of such changes on both industries. This article delves into Christie’s insights, the current state of marijuana and cryptocurrency regulations, and the broader implications of these anticipated reforms.

 

The Current Landscape of Marijuana Legislation

 

Federal vs. State Laws

Marijuana remains classified as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which places it in the same category as heroin and LSD. This classification has created a complex legal landscape where states have moved to legalize cannabis for medical and recreational use, while federal law continues to impose strict prohibitions. As of now, over 30 states have legalized marijuana in some form, leading to a burgeoning industry that generates billions in revenue.

 

Challenges Faced by the Cannabis Industry

 

Despite its legality in many states, the cannabis industry faces significant hurdles due to federal restrictions. These challenges include:

  • Banking Access: Many banks are hesitant to work with cannabis businesses due to fear of federal repercussions, forcing these businesses to operate largely in cash.

  • Taxation Issues: The IRS enforces Section 280E of the tax code, which prohibits businesses engaged in illegal activities from deducting normal business expenses, leading to disproportionately high tax burdens for cannabis companies.

  • Interstate Commerce: The lack of federal legalization prevents cannabis businesses from operating across state lines, limiting their growth potential.

 

Chris Christie’s Perspective on Marijuana Reform

 

Christie, a former presidential candidate known for his tough stance on drugs during his tenure as governor, has evolved his views on marijuana over the years. In his recent statements, he emphasized that Trump is likely to pursue descheduling cannabis, which would remove it from the Schedule I classification. This move would not only provide clarity for businesses operating in legal markets but also open avenues for banking and investment.

 

Christie highlighted that descheduling would allow for a more regulated market where safety standards could be established, thus protecting consumers. He believes that this approach aligns with a growing consensus among Americans who support legalization and recognize the potential benefits of cannabis use for both medical and recreational purposes.

 

The Future of Cryptocurrency Regulation = The Rise of Cryptocurrencies

 

Cryptocurrencies have surged in popularity over the past decade, with Bitcoin leading the charge as the first decentralized digital currency. The market has expanded to include thousands of alternative coins (altcoins), each with unique features and use cases. As cryptocurrencies gain traction among investors and consumers alike, regulatory scrutiny has intensified.

 

Current Regulatory Challenges

 

The cryptocurrency market faces several regulatory challenges that hinder its growth and adoption:

 

  • Lack of Clarity: Regulatory frameworks vary significantly across states and countries, creating confusion for investors and businesses.

  • Fraud and Scams: The rapid growth of cryptocurrencies has led to an increase in fraudulent schemes targeting unsuspecting investors.

  • Consumer Protection: Without clear regulations, consumers are often left vulnerable to risks associated with volatile markets.

 

Christie’s Vision for Crypto Regulation

 

Christie believes that under Trump’s leadership, there will be an effort to find a “sweet spot” for cryptocurrency regulation balancing innovation with consumer protection. He argues that overly stringent regulations could stifle growth in this emerging sector while too little oversight could expose consumers to significant risks.

 

In his view, a balanced regulatory framework would include:

 

1. Clear Definitions: Establishing clear definitions for different types of cryptocurrencies and tokens to differentiate between securities and utility tokens.

2. Consumer Protections: Implementing measures to protect investors from fraud while promoting transparency within the market.

3. Encouraging Innovation: Creating an environment conducive to innovation by allowing startups to thrive without excessive regulatory burdens.

 

Christie’s insights reflect a growing recognition among policymakers that cryptocurrencies are here to stay and that appropriate regulations are necessary to foster growth while safeguarding consumers.

 

Implications of Proposed Reforms

 

Economic Impact

 

The potential reforms proposed by Christie could have far-reaching economic implications:

 

  • Job Creation: Legalizing marijuana at the federal level could lead to significant job creation within the cannabis industry—from cultivation and production to retail sales.

  • Investment Opportunities: Descheduling cannabis would open up investment opportunities for institutional investors who have been hesitant due to federal restrictions.

  • Boosting Local Economies: Legal cannabis markets have proven beneficial for local economies through increased tax revenues and job creation.

 

Similarly, clear regulations around cryptocurrencies could stimulate investment in blockchain technology and related industries, fostering innovation and economic growth.

 

Social Justice Considerations

 

Both marijuana legalization and sensible cryptocurrency regulations have social justice implications:

 

  • Addressing Past Injustices: Legalizing marijuana could help rectify past injustices related to drug enforcement policies that disproportionately affected marginalized communities.

  • Financial Inclusion: Cryptocurrencies offer opportunities for financial inclusion for those underserved by traditional banking systems, particularly in low-income communities.

 

Political Landscape

 

The political landscape surrounding these issues is complex. While there is bipartisan support for marijuana reform among certain lawmakers, challenges remain in overcoming entrenched opposition. Similarly, cryptocurrency regulation has garnered attention from both sides of the aisle but requires collaboration to establish effective frameworks.

 

Conclusion

 

Chris Christie’s predictions about President-elect Donald Trump’s approach to federal marijuana descheduling and cryptocurrency regulation suggest a potential shift in U.S. policy that could significantly reshape both industries. As public opinion evolves on these issues, lawmakers have an opportunity to enact meaningful reforms that promote economic growth while ensuring consumer protection. The anticipated changes could foster a more robust cannabis industry that contributes positively to the economy and addresses social justice concerns, while clear regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies could encourage innovation and protect consumers in the digital economy. Stakeholders in both sectors are closely watching these developments, eager to see how potential reforms might impact their futures. While the realization of Christie’s predictions remains uncertain, it’s clear that the conversation around marijuana and cryptocurrency regulation is ongoing and far from settled.

 

TRUMP 2.0 ON CANNABIS REFORM, READ ON…

TRUMP ON MARIJUANA REFORM

TRUMP 2.0 ON FEDERAL CANNABIS REFORM – WHAT DO WE KNOW?

 



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Webinar Replay: Post-Election Cannabis Wrap – Smoke ’em if You’ve Got ’em

Published

on

By


On Thursday, November 7th, Vince Sliwoski, Aaron Pelley and Fred Rocafort held a post election discussion “Post-Election Cannabis Wrap – Smoke ’em if You’ve Got ’em”. Watch the replay!

Key Takeaways from the “Smoke ’em if You’ve Got ’em – 2024 Post Election Cannabis Wrap” Webinar:

  1. Panelists:
    • Vince Sliwoski: Oregon Business lawyer specializing in cannabis and commercial real estate.
    • Aaron Pelley: Experienced in cannabis law since Washington’s legalization in 2012.
    • Fred Rocafort: Trademark attorney working closely with the cannabis team.
  2. Election Results Overview:
    • Most 2024 cannabis ballot measures did not pass.
    • Florida, South Dakota, and North Dakota saw failures.
    • Nebraska became the 39th state to legalize cannabis for medical use when it passed two cannabis initiatives, Initiatives 437 and 438.
  3. Federal and State-Level Developments:
    • Medical use is currently legal in 38 states, and 24 states allow recreational use.
    • Republican support for marijuana legalization is growing.
  4. Federal Policy Implications:
    • Schedule III Rescheduling: The process to move cannabis to Schedule III is ongoing, which could significantly impact the industry.
    • Importance of Federal Appointments: The future of cannabis policy depends heavily on who is appointed to key positions in the administration.
  5. International and Domestic Trade:
    • Schedule III status could ease import/export restrictions on cannabis.
    • Unified control of House, Senate, and presidency might expedite legislative progress.
  6. Economic and Industry Impact:
    • Cannabis stocks experienced volatility post-election, reflecting investor uncertainty.
    • Federal legalization and banking reforms are crucial for industry stability and growth.
  7. Future Outlook:
    • The potential for federal rescheduling remains strong, with hearings scheduled for early 2025.
    • State-level initiatives and regulatory developments will continue to shape the industry.

Watch the replay!



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

I Had Just One Puff

Published

on

By


one puff of a joint a drug test

“How Long Does One Puff of Weed Stay in Your System?”… This topic can be difficult to answer since it is dependent on elements such as the size of the hit and what constitutes a “one hit.” If you take a large bong pull then cough, it might linger in your system for 5-7 days. A moderate dose from a joint can last 3-5 days, whereas a few hits from a vaporizer may last 1-3 days.

 

The length of time that marijuana stays in the body varies based on a number of factors, including metabolism, THC levels, frequency of use, and hydration.

 

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, is the primary psychoactive component of cannabis. THC and its metabolites, which remain in your body long after the effects have subsided, are detected by drug tests.

 

Since these metabolites are fat-soluble, they cling to bodily fat molecules. They could thus take a while to fully pass through your system, particularly if your body fat percentage is higher.

 

THC is absorbed by tissues and organs (including the brain, heart, and fat) and converted by the liver into chemicals such as 11-hydroxy-THC and carboxy-THC. Cannabis is eliminated in feces at a rate of around 65%, while urine accounts for 20%. The leftover amount might be kept within the body.

 

THC deposited in bodily tissues ultimately re-enters the circulation and is processed by the liver. For frequent users, THC accumulates in fatty tissues quicker than it can be removed, thus it may be detectable in drug tests for days or weeks following consumption.

 

The detection time varies according to the amount and frequency of cannabis usage. Higher dosages and regular usage result in longer detection times.

 

The type of drug test also affects detection windows. Blood and saliva tests typically detect cannabis metabolites for shorter periods, while urine and hair samples can reveal use for weeks or even months. In some cases, hair tests have detected cannabis use over 90 days after consumption.

 

Detection Windows for Various Cannabis Drug Tests

 

Urine Tests

Among all drug tests, urine testing is the most commonly used method for screening for drug use in an individual.

 

Detection times vary, but a 2017 review suggests the following windows for cannabis in urine after last use:

 

– Single-use (e.g., one joint): up to 3 days

– Moderate use (around 4 times a week): 5–7 days

– Chronic use (daily): 10–15 days

– Chronic heavy use (multiple times daily): over 30 days

 

Blood Tests

Blood tests generally detect recent cannabis use, typically within 2–12 hours after consumption. However, in cases of heavy use, cannabis has been detected up to 30 days later. Chronic heavy use can extend the detection period in the bloodstream.

 

Saliva Tests

THC can enter saliva through secondhand cannabis smoke, but THC metabolites are only present if you’ve personally smoked or ingested cannabis.

 

Saliva testing has a short detection window and can sometimes identify cannabis use on the same day. A 2020 review found that THC was detectable in the saliva of frequent users for up to 72 hours after use, and it may remain in saliva longer than in blood following recent use.

 

In areas where cannabis is illegal, saliva testing is often used for roadside screenings.

 

Hair Tests

Hair follicle tests can detect cannabis use for up to 90 days. After use, cannabinoids reach the hair follicles through small blood vessels and from sebum and sweat surrounding the hair.

 

Hair grows at approximately 0.5 inches per month, so a 1.5-inch segment of hair close to the scalp can reveal cannabis use over the past three months.

 

Factors Affecting THC and Metabolite Retention

 

The length of time THC and its metabolites stay in your system depends on various factors. Some, like body mass index (BMI) and metabolic rate, relate to individual body processing, not the drug itself.

 

Other factors are specific to cannabis use, including:

 

– Dosage: How much you consume

– Frequency: How often you use cannabis

– Method of consumption: Smoking, dabbing, edibles, or sublingual

– THC potency: Higher potency can extend detection time

 

Higher doses and more frequent use generally extend THC retention. Cannabis consumed orally may remain in the system slightly longer than smoked cannabis, and stronger cannabis strains, higher in THC, may also stay detectable for a longer period.

 

How Quickly Do the Effects of Cannabis Set In?

 

When smoking cannabis, effects appear almost immediately, while ingested cannabis may take 1–3 hours to peak.

 

The psychoactive component THC produces a “high” with common effects such as:

 

– Altered senses, including perception of time

– Mood changes

– Difficulty with thinking and problem-solving

– Impaired memory

 

Other short-term effects can include:

– Anxiety and confusion

– Decreased coordination

– Dry mouth and eyes

– Nausea or lightheadedness

– Trouble focusing

– Increased appetite

– Rapid heart rate

– Restlessness and sleepiness

 

In rare cases, high doses may lead to hallucinations, delusions, or acute psychosis.

 

Regular cannabis use may have additional mental and physical effects. While research is ongoing, cannabis use may increase the risk of:

 

– Cognitive issues like memory loss

– Cardiovascular problems including heart disease and stroke

– Respiratory illnesses such as bronchitis or lung infections

– Mood disorders like depression and anxiety

 

Cannabis use during pregnancy can negatively impact fetal growth and development.

 

Duration of Effects

Short-term effects generally taper off within 1–3 hours, but for chronic users, some long-term effects may last days, weeks, or even months. Certain effects may even be permanent.

 

Bottom Line

The amount of time that cannabis remains in your system following a single use varies greatly depending on individual characteristics such as body fat, metabolism, frequency of use, and mode of intake. Frequent users may maintain traces of THC for weeks, whereas infrequent users may test positive for as little as a few days. Hair tests can disclose usage for up to 90 days, while blood and saliva tests identify more recent use. Urine tests are the most popular and have varying detection durations. The duration that THC and its metabolites are detectable will ultimately depend on a number of factors, including dose, strength, and individual body chemistry.

 

PEE IN A CUP COMING UP, READ ON..

how long does weed stay in your urine

HOW LONG DOES WEED STAY IN YOUR URINE FOR A DRUG TEST?



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media