Connect with us

Cannabis News

Top Veterans Group Warns Congress That Hemp Ban Could ‘Slam The Door Shut’ On Medical Research

Published

on

A leading veterans’ organization has warned congressional leaders that a newly approved blanket ban on consumable hemp products could inadvertently “close the door” on critical research.

In a letter to House and Senate leaders on Wednesday, American Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) executives stressed the importance of “supporting robust scientific research into hemp-derived cannabinoids,” which they said could be at risk. President Donald Trump has signed provisions of a spending bill into law.

Hemp-based cannabinoid products “can offer a real alternative to heavy prescription drugs, so many of our veterans prescribe them for PTSD, anxiety, pain and sleep problems,” wrote the VFW’s Carol Whitmore and Dan West.

“Every day, doctors dispense powerful sedatives and psychoactive drugs to help veterans cope. They work for some, but they’re too hooked, numb, or dealing with brutal side effects,” they wrote. “We’ve all seen good men and women get caught in a cycle of pills that dull the pain but don’t fix the problem.”

“It’s time to explore safer options. Early research on certain hemp compounds suggests they can manage symptoms and reduce physical pain without the risk of addiction,” the letter says, citing recent research showing that hemp-derived cannabinoids improve PTSD symptoms and may be an effective alternative treatment for pain and anxiety.

“This is not evidence of a miracle cure, just clear signs that we should continue to study. But broad movements to ‘close the hemp loophole’ could close the door. A blanket ban on hemp cannabinoids would make it nearly impossible for researchers and (US Department of Veterans Affairs) hospitals to examine the rules by which even small businesses that have legally acquired these compounds are acting legally. Seriously, it would drive veterans seeking relief into black market junk, making things more dangerous. making it not safer.”

The VFW said it is not promoting “wild, unregulated products or recreational use,” but instead “is calling for smart policy: protect the public, but don’t kill research.”

“Let science do its job, regulate what’s proven safe, and give veterans every legitimate tool available to reclaim their lives,” the letter says. “Our veterans have earned the best care we can give them. We urge Congress to take a balanced approach that protects consumers, promotes research, and gives veterans hope for safer alternatives.”

In the last month, The VFW announced that it has entered into a first-of-its-kind partnership with hemp THC beverage company Torch Drinkswith a licensed branding agreement to support various veterans services and promote cannabis beverages as a potential alternative to alcohol. In addition to the brand licensing agreement, the cannabis beverages will be available at VFW posts across the country in jurisdictions where they are locally legal.

Debate over the current appropriations bill’s hemp ban has been fueled by some who believe recriminalizing cannabis products will alleviate public health concerns, particularly regarding youth access to unregulated markets, and others who insist Congress should address the challenges by enacting regulations, including age requirements and testing requirements.

Many hemp participants argue that a ban would effectively wipe out the industry, even if enforced Non-toxic CBD products that people use for medical reasons— There is a hidden hope that they can reach an agreement with the legislators before the ban is implemented next year.

Lawmakers like Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) also say the window could allow them to advance legislation to create an alternative regulatory model for consumer hemp products.

There were Attempts by GOP lawmakers in both chambers to kill the hemp ban provision. But amendments proposed by Senators Rand Paul (R-KY) and Thomas Massie (R-KY) were not included in the final package.

On the Senate side, Paul was joined by 22 Democrats, and especially Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) anti-marijuana: voting against the motion to introduce the amendment to avoid the ban, but was eventually overturned by the majority.

Massie tried to revive momentum in the House with an amendment mirroring Paul’s, but its chances of passage were dubious at best, as there was general agreement within the Republican caucus that the spending bill could return to the Senate without further changes.


It’s Marijuana Time tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters by pledging at least $25/month, you’ll get access to our interactive maps, charts, and audio calendars so you never miss a development.


Learn more about our marijuana bill tracking and become a Patreon supporter to gain access

Since 2018, cannabis products have been considered legal hemp if they contain less than 0.3 percent delta-9 THC by dry weight.

The new legislation specifies that, within a year of taking effect, the weight will be applied to total THC—including delta-8 and other isomers. Also, “as tetrahydrocannabinol (or any other marketed cannabinoid) with similar effects in humans or animals (as determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services).”

The new definition of legal hemp will also prohibit “any hemp-derived cannabinoid intermediate product marketed or sold as an end product or directly to an end consumer for personal or home use” as well as products containing cannabinoids that are synthesized or manufactured outside of the cannabis plant or are unable to produce it naturally.

Legal hemp products will be limited to a total of 0.4 milligrams of total THC or any other cannabinoid with similar effects per container.

Within 90 days of the bill’s passage, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other agencies must “publish a list of all cannabinoids known to the FDA to be naturally produced by a Cannabis sativa L. plant, as reflected in the peer-reviewed literature,” which include “all tetrahydrocannabinol classes known” in natural plants and “known cannabinoids.” cannabinoids that have or are marketed as having effects similar to cannabinoids of the tetrahydrocannabinol class.

The language differs slightly from provisions in legislation advanced out of the House and Senate Appropriations panels, which would have banned products with “quantifiable” amounts of THC, to be determined by the HHS secretary and the agriculture secretary.

Meanwhile, advocates are strongly criticizing congressional leaders for advancing a spending bill ahead of Veterans Day on Tuesday, which also omits bipartisan provisions. Allowing the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to prescribe medical cannabis to doctors to patients in states where it is legal—although the policy was approved by the full Senate and House earlier this year.

Read about the VFWs the letter To Congress on the hemp ban below:

Brendan Cleak’s photo.

Marihuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron on Patreon!

Cannabis News

Ora Pharm affirms uninterrupted access to Helius products

Published

on

By

Ora Pharm has confirmed that New Zealand patients, prescribers and pharmacies continue to have uninterrupted access to Helius Therapeutics products following the successful acquisition of the business and its key assets, directly challenging the misinformation being circulated to patients and prescribers by cannabis importer MW Pharma Limited (trading as NUBU).

Industry monitoring was highlighted on Monday, July 20th, when Helius Therapeutics announced that NZ Grow Co. As he inaugurated Growers Day. The event demonstrated the full operational strength, advanced capabilities and integrated supply chain now fully operational under Ora Pharm’s leadership to support the growth of the NZ sector.

At the event, CEO Zoë Reece addressed concerns stemming from a July 9 industry bulletin distributed by NUBU, which stated that “Helius Therapeutics has ceased production and all products are now discontinued.”

© Ora Pharm

Ora Pharm said the statement was incorrect and had the potential to create unnecessary uncertainty in a highly regulated healthcare sector.

“Inaccurate information about the availability of medicines can cause unnecessary worry for patients, prescribers and pharmacies, interfere with treatment decisions and undermine confidence in the New Zealand cannabis industry.”

Ora Pharm completed the business and acquisition of key assets of Helius Therapeutics on June 18, 2026, resuming manufacturing, packaging and nationwide distribution the following day. All Helius brand formulated products and locally grown products remain approved and available for patient supply.

CEO Zoë Reece said the company’s focus is on ensuring continuity of care while strengthening New Zealand’s medicinal cannabis industry.

“The Helius facility gives New Zealand growers direct access to world-class pharmaceutical drying, extraction and manufacturing capabilities. Combined with NZ Grow Co., we are creating a secure and integrated pathway from cultivation to finished products and international markets. Our focus is on clinical continuity, quality assurance and confidence in patients and prescribing physicians every day.”

© Ora Pharm

The integration of the GMP-certified Auckland manufacturing facility with NZ Grow Co.’s cultivation network creates New Zealand’s largest medicinal cannabis supply chain. This unified network insulates domestic patients from volatile international import dependencies while providing independent local growers with a transparent, high-standard route to export markets.

Ora Pharm remains committed to working collaboratively across the sector to support patient access, strengthen confidence in the New Zealand cannabis industry and continue to invest in New Zealand’s pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity.

For more information:
Ora Pharm
(email protected)
www.orapharm.co.nz

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

California Treasurer Announces Hearing On Marijuana Business Banking Access Issues

Published

on

By

California’s state treasurer has announced he will convene a hearing next week to highlight the marijuana industry’s banking access “challenges” and its impact on businesses, workers and communities.

The hearing, organized by Treasurer Fiona Ma (D), comes ten years after her predecessor launched a Cannabis Bank Task Force to look into the issue.

Titled “Continuing the Conversation: Advancing Safe and Legal Banking for California’s Cannabis Industry,” Wednesday’s hearing will feature state and local officials, financial institutions and representatives of marijuana companies. The plan is to “review progress made, discuss remaining obstacles, and consider practical steps California can take to support a safe, transparent and well-regulated legal cannabis market,” Ma’s office said in a press release.

“Nearly a decade after the launch of the Cannabis Banking Working Group, California’s legal cannabis industry continues to face barriers to access to affordable and reliable financial services due to state-federal conflict,” Ma. he said. “This hearing it will help us assess what has changed, identify challenges that remain, and continue the conversation about practical solutions that support public safety, transparency, and responsible business operations.”

Last month, bipartisan members of the US House and Senate reintroduced the legislation protect banks from being penalized for providing financial services to marijuana businesses.

Previous iterations of the banking legislation have been introduced in previous sessions of Congress, and while the House of Representatives has passed versions on several occasions, the reform has never become law.

While some banks serve marijuana businesses, the continued federal illegalization of the plant has made many reluctant to work with the industry.

“Limited access may increase operating costs, complicate routine financial transactions, and require some businesses to handle larger amounts of money, creating additional security and administrative concerns,” Ma’s office said.

Marihuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Peat is a lot more sustainable than we think

Published

on

By

Increasing public scrutiny has questioned whether the use of peat is environmentally sustainable. A new review According to Dr. James Altland, research director of the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service, and Dr. Bruce Bugbee of Utah State University, they present a more nuanced picture than much of the current evidence portrays.

“Much of the debate in the popular press suggests that the use of peat in horticulture is unsustainable because it causes global warming and other environmental impacts,” shares James. “We have seen that agriculture is much more sustainable than some parties in the media want us to believe.”

© USDA

Differences between regions matter
The review states that assessments of peatland sustainability should differentiate between regions. While European peatlands have been heavily impacted by centuries of drainage and peat extraction, most Canadian peatlands remain undisturbed, with only a small proportion used for horticulture. According to the authors, this distinction is important when assessing the environmental impact of peat production.

“Currently, Canadian peatlands are sequestering carbon faster than the rate of extraction from container crop production. At current rates of extraction and with appropriate restoration, peatland use in North America is environmentally sustainable.”

The authors note that horticultural peat extraction in Canada accounts for only a small fraction of the total peatland area and that harvested sites are routinely restored after production.

© USDA

Restoration supports long-term recovery
The paper highlights the role of restoration practices, particularly the Moss Layer Transfer Technique (MLTT), in restoring peat-forming ecosystems.

“Restoration techniques, such as the moss layer transfer technique, can turn harvested peatlands into carbon sinks over decades,” he added. The review found that restored peatlands can restore vegetation, biodiversity and carbon sequestration functions over time, while improvements in water storage and hydrological performance are also documented.

© USDA

Alternatives also have environmental impacts
The researchers also looked at published life cycle assessments comparing them to substrates such as peat, korea, wood fiber, perlite and rock wool. “Life cycle assessments show that alternative substrates often have environmental impacts comparable to or greater than peat, especially when considering water use, transport and fertilizer inputs.”

The review concludes that comparisons depend on system limitations and assumptions, and that broad claims that alternatives are inherently more sustainable than peat are not consistently supported by published analyses.

© USDA
Figure A: Global carbon storage in natural systems (Gt, gigatons)
(Hirschler and Osterburg, 2022; Cleary et al, 2005; IPCC, 2023)

Performance remains an important consideration
Beyond sustainability, the paper reviews the functional characteristics that have made peat the reference substrate for container production.

“Soil’s high cation exchange capacity, water retention and stability support optimal plant growth and nutrient uptake,” shares James. The authors point out that these properties contribute to efficient irrigation and fertilizer management, maintaining good root zone conditions.

Although wood fibers, coir, and other materials can reduce peat use in mixes, each introduces its own management considerations, such as nutrient immobilization, water use, or processing requirements.

© USDA
Figure B: Annual carbon flux from human activities and sequestration through natural processes (Gt CO2-eq per year)
(Hirschler and Osterburg, 2022; Cleary et al, 2005; IPCC, 2023)

Managing future demand
As the global demand for soilless growth media is expected to increase significantly in the coming decades, the authors believe that a variety of substrate materials will be required.

“At current rates of extraction and with appropriate restoration, peat use in North America is environmentally sustainable and remains essential for horticulture and urban greening.”

For more information:
US Department of Agriculture
James Altland, Head of Research
Application Technologies Research Unit
(email protected)
www.usda.gov

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media