Connect with us

Cannabis News

Hemp sector at risk as last minute shutdown bill adds language targeting intoxicating products

Published

on

The bill passed by the United States Senate to reopen the federal government includes language that could effectively shut down the country’s current hemp sector. Buried in the 141-page funding package is a provision that would ban the sale of unregulated intoxicating hemp-derived products, including delta-8 THC, and would change the definition of hemp in a way that would make most existing products illegal.

The word came a day before the vote, after pressure from states and parts of the marijuana industry. Hemp operators have long argued that resistance to hemp has a lot to do with safety and market protection, noting that calls for restrictions are most organized where marijuana is legal.

According to the US Hemp Bureau, “If passed, this legislation would wipe out 95% of the industry, shut down small businesses, and shut down America’s farms at a cost of $1.5 billion in lost tax revenue to states.”

Under language now attached to the funding bill, any hemp-derived product would have to meet strict limits for human or animal consumption. It could not contain more than 0.3 percent total THC and no more than 0.4 milligrams total THC in the entire package. Cannabinoids should be naturally occurring in the plant. Compounds produced by chemical conversion or other manufacturing methods would be prohibited. In practice, this would remove most intoxicating hemp products from gas stations, online stores, and corner stores across the country.

Supporters say the measure would close a loophole that has allowed intoxicating hemp products to spread without oversight. Opponents say it would stifle the hemp economy by leaving CBD and industrial hemp uses alone.

The conflict came to a head in Kentucky, where the two state senators found themselves on opposite sides. Senator Rand Paul warned that the language would kill an entire industry and hurt farmers and small businesses. He summarized the bill, Sharing in X that the provision has nothing to do with reopening the government and would hurt Kentucky agriculture.

The voices of the industry line up behind this vision. Tilray Brands stated: “As a leader in the hemp industry, Tilray Brands strongly supports forward-thinking smart regulation, not bans that stifle innovation, threaten small businesses and reduce consumer choices. The hemp language buried in the government’s funding bill is misguided, misguided in consumer interests, and misplaced in law.

The company added that responsible operators already comply with state regulations and called on Congress to work with the industry instead of passing restrictions that would eliminate an entire product category.

© Tilray Marks

Others are putting data on the table. “The data shows that adults are using hemp beverages responsibly to relax, reduce alcohol consumption and feel better without high levels of intoxication,” said Kevin Provost, CEO of MoreBetter. Chief Operating Officer Tyler Dautrich added, “This is not a legalization debate, this is a data-driven public health issue.

“Our industry is being used as a pawn by leaders as they work to reopen the government. Recriminalizing hemp will force American farms and businesses to close and disrupt the well-being of countless Americans who depend on hemp,” said Jonathan Miller, General Counsel of the U.S. Hemp Roundtable.

The hemp-derived beverage segment alone represents $1 billion in annual sales, largely driven by small businesses and supporting farmers, processors and retailers. A recent national poll shows that more than 70 percent of Americans want hemp products to be legal and available.

The Senate passed the bill 60 to 40. The House has yet to vote. The stakes are clear. If the language doesn’t change, the government could reopen the market for hemp-cannabinoids while they disappear.

Cannabis News

Maximizing cannabis yields with intercanopy and subcanopy lighting

Published

on

By







Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Transportation Groups Warn Feds Of Marijuana Rescheduling’s ‘Consequences’ For Drug Testing Of Truck Drivers And Pilots

Published

on

By

A coalition of transportation and safety organizations said they have “serious safety concerns” about the Trump administration’s move to federally regulate marijuana.

Led by the American Trucking Association, the groups sent a letter to federal officials Monday asking them to take steps to ensure truck drivers, pilots, transit operators and other safety-sensitive workers continue to be tested for cannabis.

“If employers do not take the necessary steps to preserve the ability of security-sensitive transportation workers to test for marijuana, this change could have significant consequences for the safety of passengers and the entire transportation industry,” wrote Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, and Transportation Secretary J.

The organizations said they understand that federal officials are being “urgently” reorganized under an executive order from President Donald Trump, that they are “deeply concerned that the current process does not adequately take into account agencies responsible for transportation safety or protecting the traveling public” and that they want the agencies to “work together.” ongoing cannabis redistricting hearings and rulemaking process to address these concerns.

In May, the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued new guidelines saying just that Truck drivers, airline pilots and other safety-sensitive workers still cannot use medical marijuana without penalty despite the Trump administration’s move to reschedule.

“Marijuana use is incompatible with safety-sensitive functions,” the department said.

Medical review officers (MROs) who receive drug test results indicating cannabis use cannot rule them out as negative for illegal substance use, even if an employee claims it was a result of state-licensed medical marijuana.

“Currently, there is no way for an MRO to verify that a laboratory-confirmed marijuana drug test result is positive when an employee claims the positive was caused by a state-licensed marijuana product,” the DOT said, explaining that after the reprogramming, medical marijuana dispensed under state law “does not” constitute a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The transportation groups said in the new letter that the DOT’s drug-testing program “is in accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs and HHS-certified laboratories.”

“While DOT has expressed its intention to continue testing marijuana, a commitment we greatly appreciate, it is unclear whether DOT will retain its ability to rely on HHS procedures and certifications after the rescheduling,” they wrote. “Without this alignment, DOT may retain the authority to conduct testing, but lack the scientific and procedural infrastructure to do so.”

“Practically, this would mean that truck and bus drivers, pilots, flight attendants, air traffic controllers, air mechanics, railroad workers, dispatchers and signal workers, transit operators and pipeline workers could continue to perform high-risk safety roles without a reliable means of verifying that they are not actively using marijuana. It relies on controlled substance testing to identify end use and prevent potentially impaired individuals from fulfilling their safety-related obligations. While the planning could create legal or regulatory loopholes, the regulated employer-based drug testing agency warned that the final rules should not jeopardize marijuana testing for safety-sensitive transportation workers.”

“Regardless of the broader policy goals of the review, the federal government should not move forward to preserve transportation drug testing programs and mitigate the risks of increased and unchecked deterioration of our roads, railroads, public transportation systems, pipelines, airspace, and maritime corridors,” the letter says.

The organizations specifically ask federal officials to:

  • Support long-term marijuana testing for all safety-sensitive transportation workers;
  • Confirm the authority of DOT-regulated employers to perform such tests;
  • Ensure HHS laboratory certification and testing guidelines remain available and aligned with DOT’s safety mission; and
  • Establish a coordinated federal strategy to address the transportation security implications of rescheduling.

“The public and the workers who keep our transportation system running safely deserve a process that ensures these safeguards are firmly in place before any final action is taken,” he said. the letter he says

Earlier this month, the House Appropriations Committee approved a provision to allow federal officials to continue requiring government employees and security-sensitive employees, such as truck drivers and airline pilots must be drug tested for marijuana, “regardless of any future change in legal status or schedule.”

This was followed by a press conference organized by prohibitionist groups and a drug-testing industry association, where both Republican lawmakers joined the proclamation. “Cut” to marijuana rescheduling by asserting that safety-sensitive transportation workers can still be punished for testing positive for THC.

Legislators and abolitionist activists argued that moving marijuana to Schedule III would lead to a 1986 executive order signed by President Ronald Reagan defining illegal drugs under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in relation to the use of cannabis by truck drivers and other airline employees.

Last October, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy suggested that President Donald Trump was “putting pressure” on rescheduling cannabis.arguing that marijuana is “truly addictive” and that policy reform on the issue sends a “dangerous” message.

“At a time when the culture is encouraging and celebrating the use of marijuana, we’re not talking about risk,” Duffy said.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Experts say THC percentage is the wrong way to shop for cannabis

Published

on

By


Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media