Cannabis News

What are Entheogens? – The Billion Dollar Bet on the Psychedelics Market

Published

7 months ago

June 4, 2024

admin

enthegoens psychedelics

What are Entheogens and why are they a human right?

Human rights are the basic rights and freedoms that belong to every person, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status.

The concept of human rights was formally enshrined into the global system with the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948. This historic document outlined 30 articles that represent the foundational rights all human beings are inherently entitled to.

However, despite the UDHR’s recognition of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, current international drug laws appear to violate these fundamental human rights. The criminalization and prohibition of certain substances, including those used in entheogenic practices, overrides an individual’s bodily autonomy and sovereignty over their own consciousness.

These subjective laws are often not based on scientific evidence of harm, but rather on political, social and cultural factors.

Entheogens are psychoactive substances, typically derived from plants or fungi, that are used in spiritual, religious or shamanic contexts to induce altered states of consciousness.

Examples include psilocybin mushrooms, ayahuasca, peyote, and iboga. Many indigenous cultures have used these substances in sacred medicinal and spiritual rituals for thousands of years. The word “entheogen” itself means “generating the divine within.”

The criminalization of entheogens and the plants/fungi they are derived from has not only violated the right to freedom of thought and religion, but has also led to the erosion of many indigenous cultural practices. Furthermore, the so-called “War on Drugs” has had devastating consequences, including mass incarceration, racial disparities in enforcement, and a failure to address addiction as a public health issue.

In this article, we will explore the history and cultural significance of entheogenic practices, the current state of drug laws, and how these laws conflict with the fundamental human rights outlined in the UDHR.

We will argue that cognitive liberty – the right to sovereignty over one’s own consciousness – is a basic human right, and that drug laws must be reformed to respect this. It is time to shift away from the criminalization paradigm and towards a rational, science-based, and compassionate approach to drug use and addiction that respects human rights.

The term “entheogen” is derived from two ancient Greek words: “entheos,” which means “full of the god, inspired, possessed,” and “genesthai,” which means “to come into being.” Put together, an entheogen is a substance that causes one to become inspired or to experience feelings of inspiration, often in a religious or “spiritual” context.

Entheogens have been used in virtually every culture and religion known to humankind. From the ancient Hindu Vedic texts describing the use of soma, to the Eleusinian Mysteries of ancient Greece, to the shamanic practices of indigenous peoples across the globe, these substances have played a profound role in human spirituality and culture.

In the modern Western context, entheogens are often associated with psychedelic substances like LSD, psilocybin mushrooms, and DMT.

However, the term entheogen is preferred by many who use these substances in a spiritual or religious context, as it emphasizes their potential for inducing mystical or transcendent experiences, rather than simply being used recreationally.

Despite their long history of cultural and religious use, many entheogens are currently illegal under international drug laws. This is a relatively recent phenomenon, with many of these substances only becoming illegal in the mid-20th century.

The reasons for their prohibition are complex and often political, rather than being based on any scientific assessment of their potential harms.

The idea that certain plants or fungi can be made illegal is, when you think about it, quite bizarre. If we accept the mainstream scientific view that humans evolved on this planet alongside these species, then we have coexisted with them for millennia. Many of the plants and fungi containing entheogenic compounds have been consumed by humans for thousands of years with no major detriment to society.

Furthermore, it’s important to note that it is not the plants or fungi themselves that are illegal, but rather the human act of possessing, cultivating, or consuming them.

The notion that a government can prohibit an individual from altering their own consciousness, especially in a spiritual or religious context, seems to fly in the face of basic human rights and cognitive liberty.

This is why the term “entheogen” is so important. By using this word, we acknowledge that these substances are not merely “drugs” used for recreation, but rather tools that have been used for millennia for spiritual and religious purposes. When we frame them in this context, it becomes clear that their prohibition is not only illogical but also an infringement on religious freedom and personal autonomy.

One of the key arguments put forth by those in favor of drug prohibition is that if we were to legalize cannabis and other entheogens, society would collapse. They paint a picture of widespread addiction, decreased productivity, and moral decay.

However, the recent legalization of cannabis in many jurisdictions has proven this narrative to be false. Society continues to function normally in these areas. In fact, some evidence suggests that there are positive outcomes associated with legalization, such as people reducing their use of pharmaceuticals and becoming more active and healthier.

It’s important to note that not all entheogens are the same. For example, the experience of consuming psilocybin mushrooms is vastly different from that of cannabis. However, this distinction is largely irrelevant when it comes to the question of legalization.

This is because the use of entheogens, regardless of their specific effects, is typically guided by the principle of “Set and Setting.”

“Set and Setting” is a term coined by psychedelic researcher Timothy Leary in the 1960s. It refers to the psychological, social, and cultural parameters that shape the response to psychedelic drugs. “Set” is the mental state a person brings to the experience, including their thoughts, mood and expectations.

“Setting” is the physical and social environment in which the drug is consumed. The idea is that the effects of a psychedelic drug are largely determined by these factors, rather than by the drug itself.

Those who choose to consume entheogens, whether in a spiritual, therapeutic, or recreational context, generally understand the importance of Set and Setting.

They recognize that these are powerful substances that should be used with intention, preparation, and care. This understanding mitigates many of the potential risks associated with entheogen use.

Moreover, even if entheogens were legal, it’s likely that many, if not most, people would still choose not to consume them. Personal beliefs, cultural norms, and individual preferences all play a role in shaping behavior.

We can see this with the legalization of cannabis – while some people felt more free to experiment, the majority of the population did not suddenly become regular cannabis users.

Historical and contemporary evidence suggests that those who wish to consume entheogens will find ways to do so regardless of their legal status. Conversely, those who have no interest in consuming these substances are unlikely to start simply because they are legal.

Therefore it’s safe to assume that even though legalization of entheogens might be “scary” for some, the truth is that the world won’t end and in fact, it might revolutionize society to become something better.

Those who engage in entheogenic practices often describe their experiences as “holistic,” reporting a profound sense of connection to all things on the planet. They speak of experiencing “universal love” and a deep sense of unity with all of existence.

This perspective shift, often referred to as the “entheogenic experience,” has the potential to dramatically alter the way individuals relate to themselves, others, and the world around them.

Imagine if just 10% of the global population adopted this concept of universal connectedness. It could lead to a significant reduction in violence, exploitation, and divisiveness.

After all, how can you harm or cheat that which you feel a deep, intrinsic connection to? Empathy, it seems, is a natural byproduct of entheogenic practices.

While highly subjective, many individuals who regularly engage in entheogenic practices report becoming less attached to political ideologies. They find themselves challenging their own prejudices and thinking outside of the rigid mental structures that often define our worldviews.

In neurological terms, these structures are literally hardwired into our brains as we strengthen certain neural networks through repetition and reinforcement.

Entheogens, on the other hand, seem to induce a state of heightened neuroplasticity, allowing individuals to break free from these “neural boxes” constructed by culture, habit, and conditioning. This flexibility of thought could be key in addressing many of the complex, systemic issues we face as a species.

Imagine a world where empathy, adaptability, and nuanced thinking are the norm. A world where political tribalism takes a backseat to universal human welfare. Where the needs and perspectives of all individuals, regardless of their background, are considered and incorporated into the fabric of society.

This is the kind of paradigm shift that widespread entheogenic practices could potentially catalyze.

A society built on these principles would be primed for unprecedented growth and evolution. It would be a society rooted in love, freedom, and the understanding that we are all interconnected.

While the widespread adoption of entheogenic practices is not a panacea, it could be a powerful tool in facilitating the kind of global consciousness shift that our species so desperately needs.

Of course, this vision is speculative and optimistic. Realizing it would require significant changes in our current legal, social, and cultural frameworks. But in a world increasingly fractured by division, inequality, and environmental destruction, it’s a vision worth considering.

Perhaps, by embracing the wisdom and potential of entheogenic practices, we can take a collective step towards a more empathetic, connected, and enlightened human future.

My goal with this article is to show you the insanity of drug laws. To show you that your use of LSD, Psilocybin and yes…cannabis…is a protected human right. I want to show you that despite legalization, most people will still not use it and finally, that perhaps, this path of entheogens could be the first domino to save humanity from greed, corruption, and hate.

You’re not a drug users – you’re a psychospiritual practitioner. Remember that always.

BIG PHARMA GETS ENTHEOGENS, READ ON…

THE BIG PHARMA ENTHOEGENS REVOLUTION IS NOW HERE!

Source link

Cannabis News

The Grinch Stole SAFE Banking from the Cannabis Industry This Christmas, Yet Again!

Published

17 hours ago

December 22, 2024

admin

no safe banking in 2024

The landscape of cannabis legislation in the United States has been a complex and evolving issue, particularly concerning banking regulations. As of December 2024, it has become official: the current Congress will not provide any protections for banks that serve state-legal marijuana businesses. This decision has significant implications for the cannabis industry, which continues to grow rapidly despite the lack of federal support. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this decision, the implications for cannabis businesses, and the broader context of cannabis legalization in America.

The State of Cannabis Legalization

A Growing Industry

The cannabis industry has seen remarkable growth over the past decade. As of late 2024, 23 states and Washington D.C. have legalized recreational marijuana use, while 38 states allow medical marijuana. According to recent estimates, the legal cannabis market in the U.S. is projected to reach over $40 billion by 2025. This growth has been fueled by changing public perceptions of marijuana, increased advocacy for legalization, and significant tax revenues generated by state-legal cannabis sales.

The Banking Dilemma

Despite this rapid expansion, cannabis businesses face unique challenges, primarily due to their inability to access traditional banking services. Federal law classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act. This classification creates a significant barrier for banks and financial institutions that wish to work with cannabis businesses, as they risk federal penalties for facilitating transactions related to an illegal substance.

As a result, many cannabis companies operate on a cash-only basis. This situation not only poses safety risks—such as increased theft and violence—but also limits these businesses’ ability to manage finances effectively, pay taxes electronically, and build credit histories.

Legislative Attempts at Reform

One of the most prominent legislative efforts aimed at addressing these banking issues is the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act. First introduced in 2019, the SAFE Banking Act sought to provide protections for banks that serve legal cannabis businesses by preventing federal regulators from penalizing them for doing so.

The act garnered significant bipartisan support in both the House and Senate. In previous sessions of Congress, it passed multiple times in the House but faced hurdles in the Senate due to opposition from certain lawmakers who were concerned about broader implications of marijuana legalization.

In light of ongoing discussions about federal spending and budgetary priorities, advocates had hoped that some version of the SAFE Banking Act would be included in recent spending bills. However, during negotiations leading up to December 2024, a House committee led by Republicans removed any provisions related to marijuana banking protections from key spending legislation.

This decision reflects a broader trend within Congress where discussions around cannabis reform have become increasingly contentious. While there is still bipartisan support for certain aspects of cannabis legislation—particularly when it comes to medical use—more comprehensive reforms like banking protections have struggled to gain traction.

Implications for Cannabis Businesses

Continued Cash-Only Operations

The removal of banking protections means that many cannabis businesses will continue to operate primarily on a cash basis. This situation presents several challenges:

Safety Risks: Cash-only operations make cannabis dispensaries and cultivation facilities prime targets for theft and robber Employees often have to handle large amounts of cash daily, increasing their risk of violence.

Operational Inefficiencies: Without access to banking services, businesses cannot easily manage payroll or pay bills electronically. This inefficiency can lead to operational delays and increased costs.

Impact on Public Safety

Advocates argue that providing banking access would enhance public safety by reducing the amount of cash circulating within the community. By allowing cannabis businesses to deposit their earnings into banks, it would minimize the risks associated with cash transactions, making both employees and customers safer.

Moreover, having a transparent financial system would help law enforcement track illicit activities more effectively. Currently, without proper banking oversight, there are concerns that some cash-only operations may be involved in money laundering or other illegal activities.

Politics and Public Opinion

Changing Attitudes Toward Cannabis

Public opinion on marijuana legalization has shifted dramatically over recent years. According to various polls, a significant majority of Americans now support legalizing marijuana for both medical and recreational use. This shift has put pressure on lawmakers to address outdated federal policies regarding cannabis.

Despite this growing acceptance among the public, political divisions remain strong within Congress regarding how best to approach cannabis reform. Some lawmakers advocate for full legalization at the federal level, while others prefer a more cautious approach that prioritizes regulation over outright legalization.

The Role of Advocacy Groups

Advocacy groups play a crucial role in pushing for legislative change regarding cannabis banking protections. Organizations such as the National Cannabis Industry Association (NCIA) and Americans for Safe Access (ASA) have been vocal proponents of reforming banking laws to support state-legal cannabis businesses.

These groups have mobilized public support through campaigns highlighting the safety risks associated with cash-only operations and advocating for policies that promote financial inclusion for cannabis entrepreneurs.

Future Prospects for Cannabis Banking Reform

While current congressional efforts have stalled regarding marijuana banking protections, there are still potential avenues for reform:

Incremental Reforms: Rather than pursuing comprehensive federal legislation like the SAFE Banking Act all at once, lawmakers may consider incremental reforms that address specific issues related to banking access without fully legalizing marijuana at the federal level.

The Role of Public Awareness

As public awareness about the challenges faced by cannabis businesses grows, there may be increased pressure on lawmakers to act decisively on this issue. Continued advocacy efforts can help ensure that banking reform remains a priority on Congress’s agenda.

Conclusion

The decision by Congress not to include marijuana banking protections in its current spending bill underscores ongoing tensions surrounding cannabis legislation in America. While public opinion increasingly favors legalization and reform, political divisions continue to hinder progress on critical issues such as banking access for state-legal marijuana businesses.

As the industry continues to grow despite these challenges, stakeholders must remain vigilant in advocating for change while exploring alternative solutions at both state and federal levels. The future of cannabis banking reform remains uncertain; however, with continued advocacy and public support, there is hope that meaningful progress can be made in addressing these pressing issues facing one of America’s fastest-growing industries.

SAFE BANKING SINCE 2018, WHAT A FAILURE, READ ON…

SAFER BANKING ACT FAILS AGAINS, SAME OF BANANA IN THE TAILPIPE!

Source link

Cannabis News

HHC vs. Delta 9: Differences & Similarities

Published

2 days ago

December 20, 2024

admin

Cannabis has so many compounds, and two that have been making the rounds lately are HHC and Delta 9 THC. They’re not the same thing, even though they’re both cannabinoids that interact with the body’s endocannabinoid system. Some people want a mild, steady experience, while others might be looking for something more intense. Understanding these two can help you figure out what’s right for you.

What Is HHC?

HHC, short for hexahydrocannabinol, is a hydrogenated version of THC. It’s not something you’d find naturally in large amounts in cannabis plants. Instead, it’s made through a process that adds hydrogen molecules to THC. The result? A more stable compound that’s less prone to breaking down when exposed to heat or UV light.

How HHC Is Made

Think of it like a science experiment. HHC is usually created in a lab by taking Delta 9 or Delta 8 THC and using hydrogenation—basically, combining it with hydrogen under pressure and in the presence of a catalyst. This process changes its structure while keeping its effects somewhat similar to THC.

Common Uses and Effects of HHC

People who use HHC say it’s somewhere between Delta 8 and Delta 9 in terms of effects. It’s often described as relaxing but without being overly sedative. You might feel a light buzz, reduced stress, or mild euphoria. Some even claim it helps with discomfort or improving sleep, but solid research is still catching up. Since it’s less potent than Delta 9, it’s often favored by those who want a manageable experience without the strong psychoactive punch.

If you’re interested in trying HHC and Delta 9 for yourself, check out their wide range of products at trycandycloud.com. They’ve got everything from gummies to disposable vapes, all crafted for a smooth experience.

What Is Delta 9 THC?

Delta 9 THC is the main psychoactive compound in cannabis. It’s the reason you feel “high” when you use weed. Chemically speaking, Delta 9 has a double bond in its ninth carbon chain, which plays a big role in how it interacts with your brain.

Natural Occurrence in Cannabis

This one is straightforward: Delta 9 is found in high concentrations in marijuana plants. It’s what most people think of when they hear “THC.” Unlike HHC, there’s no need for a lab process—it’s already there. Hemp plants, however, contain much lower levels of Delta 9 THC, which is why it’s primarily extracted from marijuana.

Common Uses and Effects of Delta 9 THC

The effects of Delta 9 are well-documented. Depending on the dose, you might feel euphoria, increased appetite, or deep relaxation. For medical users, it’s often used to manage chronic pain, nausea, and other conditions. It’s also been studied for its potential benefits in anxiety relief, though higher doses might have the opposite effect, causing paranoia. Delta 9 THC is versatile, but it’s not without its risks, particularly for new users or those sensitive to its psychoactive effects.

Key Differences Between HHC and Delta 9 THC

Chemical Structure and Composition

The main difference is in their structure. Delta 9 THC has that iconic double bond, while HHC’s hydrogenation makes it more stable. This difference might not mean much to the average person, but it’s why HHC is less likely to degrade over time.

Potency Levels

Delta 9 THC is generally more potent. HHC might require a higher dose to get a comparable effect, but some people prefer its lighter touch. Potency differences can also depend on the method of consumption, with edibles typically providing a stronger, longer-lasting effect compared to vaping or smoking.

Duration of Effects

Both last a few hours, but some users report that HHC’s effects fade more gradually. Delta 9, on the other hand, can have a sharper comedown. HHC’s gradual fade makes it appealing for those who want a smooth end to their experience.

Benefits and Drawbacks of HHC and Delta 9 THC

HHC: Pros and Cons

Pros:

More stable, so it lasts longer on the shelf.
Effects are milder, making it less overwhelming for beginners.
Can be a functional option for daytime use.

Cons:

Limited research, so we don’t know its full impact yet.
Availability can be hit or miss depending on where you live.
Legal gray area in many regions.

Delta 9 THC: Pros and Cons

Pros:

Well-studied with established medical uses.
Widely available in areas where cannabis is legal.
Stronger effects make it ideal for experienced users or those with high tolerance.

Cons:

Higher chance of side effects like anxiety.
More likely to show up on drug tests.
Shorter shelf life compared to HHC.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q. Is HHC safer than Delta 9 THC?

Not enough research exists to say definitively, but HHC’s milder effects might make it feel safer to some users.

Q. Will HHC or Delta 9 THC show up on a drug test?

Yes, both can potentially show up on a drug test, so use with caution if that’s a concern.

Q. Which one is better for recreational use?

That depends on your preferences. HHC is great for a mellow time, while Delta 9 is better if you’re looking for something more intense.

HHC vs. Delta 9: Choosing the Right One for You

The choice comes down to what you’re after. If you want a milder, more laid-back experience, HHC might be a good option. On the other hand, if you’re looking for something stronger or need it for medical reasons, Delta 9 is the way to go. It also depends on what’s legal and available where you are. And always consider your tolerance levels and experience before diving in. If you’re unsure, consult with a knowledgeable dispensary staff.

Resources:

Source link

Cannabis News

What Federally Illegal Drug Has Created Almost $10 Billion in Sales Tax Revenue for States in the Last 40 Months?

Published

3 days ago

December 20, 2024

admin

sales tax revenue with marijuana

In a significant development for the burgeoning cannabis industry, the U.S. Census Bureau has reported that states across the nation have collectively amassed over **$9.7 billion** in tax revenue from marijuana sales since mid-2021. This figure underscores the economic impact of legalized cannabis and highlights the growing acceptance of marijuana as both a recreational and medicinal substance in various states. As more states move toward legalization, the financial implications both positive and negative are becoming increasingly evident.

The Landscape of Cannabis Legalization

The journey toward cannabis legalization in the United States has been long and complex. Initially criminalized in the early 20th century, cannabis began to regain acceptance in the late 20th century, particularly for medical use. The first state to legalize medical marijuana was California in 1996, setting a precedent that many states would follow.

By 2012, Colorado and Washington became the first states to legalize recreational cannabis, paving the way for a wave of legalization efforts across the country. As of now, more than 20 states have legalized recreational marijuana, while over 30 states allow medical use. This shift reflects changing public attitudes toward cannabis and recognition of its potential benefits.

Economic Implications of Legalization

The legalization of cannabis has not only transformed social norms but has also created a substantial economic impact. States that have embraced legalization have seen significant increases in tax revenue, job creation, and investment opportunities.

According to the latest Census Bureau report, states like California, Colorado, Illinois, and Michigan have emerged as leaders in cannabis tax revenue generation. These states have implemented various tax structures on marijuana sales, including excise taxes, sales taxes, and local taxes. The revenue generated is often earmarked for essential public services such as education, healthcare, infrastructure improvements, and drug rehabilitation programs.

Breakdown of Tax Revenue by State

As the largest legal cannabis market in the United States, California has been at the forefront of marijuana tax revenue generation. Since mid-2021, California has contributed approximately $2.5 billion to state coffers from cannabis taxes. This revenue is derived from both recreational and medical marijuana sales.

California’s tax structure includes a 15% excise tax on retail sales, along with local taxes that can vary significantly by city and county. The state has allocated a portion of these funds to various programs aimed at addressing issues related to drug abuse and public health.

Colorado was one of the pioneers in cannabis legalization and continues to serve as a model for other states. Since mid-2021, Colorado has generated around $1.8 billion in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state imposes a 15% excise tax on wholesale marijuana transactions and a 2.9% sales tax on retail sales.

The revenue generated from cannabis taxes has been instrumental in funding education initiatives through the Public School Fund, as well as supporting mental health programs and substance abuse treatment services.

Illinois has seen remarkable growth in its cannabis market since legalizing recreational use in January 2020. In just two years, Illinois has collected approximately $1 billion in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state imposes a tiered excise tax based on the potency of the product, ranging from 10% to 25%.

The funds collected are allocated to various initiatives, including community reinvestment programs aimed at addressing social equity issues related to past drug enforcement practices.

Michigan’s cannabis market has also flourished since legalization. Since mid-2021, Michigan has generated about $700 million in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state’s tax structure includes a 10% excise tax on recreational marijuana and a 6% sales tax.

The revenue is utilized for various purposes, including education funding and support for local governments impacted by legalization.

Broader Economic Impact

The legalization of cannabis has led to significant job creation across various sectors. According to industry reports, the legal cannabis market supports hundreds of thousands of jobs nationwide—from cultivation and processing to retail and distribution. As more states legalize marijuana, this trend is expected to continue.

With the growth of the legal cannabis industry comes increased investment opportunities. Entrepreneurs are entering the market at an unprecedented rate, leading to innovations in product development, marketing strategies, and distribution channels. This influx of investment not only benefits individual businesses but also stimulates local economies.

Social Equity Considerations

While the financial benefits of cannabis legalization are clear, it is essential to address social equity issues that arise alongside this new industry. Many states have recognized that communities disproportionately affected by past drug enforcement policies should benefit from legalization efforts.

States like Illinois have implemented community reinvestment programs that allocate a portion of cannabis tax revenues to support communities impacted by previous drug laws. These funds can be used for education initiatives, job training programs, and mental health services—aiming to rectify historical injustices associated with cannabis prohibition.

In addition to financial support for communities affected by past policies, some states are also working to create equitable licensing opportunities for individuals from those communities. By prioritizing applications from minority-owned businesses or those directly impacted by previous drug laws, states can foster a more inclusive cannabis industry.

Challenges Ahead

Despite the significant progress made through legalization efforts, challenges remain on both state and federal levels.

Federal Legalization Uncertainty

One major hurdle is the ongoing conflict between state and federal laws regarding cannabis. While many states have legalized marijuana for recreational or medical use, it remains classified as a Schedule I substance under federal law. This discrepancy creates complications for businesses operating legally at the state level but facing potential federal prosecution.

Efforts toward federal legalization or decriminalization have gained traction recently; however, progress remains slow due to political divisions and differing opinions on drug policy reform.

Regulatory Hurdles

As more states enter the legal cannabis market, regulatory frameworks must evolve to ensure consumer safety while promoting fair competition among businesses. States face challenges related to product testing standards, labeling requirements, advertising restrictions, and taxation policies that can impact market dynamics.

Conclusion

The U.S. Census Bureau reports that states have collected over $9.7 billion in marijuana tax revenue since mid-2021, highlighting the significant economic impact of cannabis legalization. As public acceptance grows, more states are likely to pursue legalization. Despite ongoing challenges, including federal regulations and social equity issues, legalized cannabis is poised to remain a vital part of state economies. Collaboration among government officials, business leaders, and community advocates will be essential for fostering an equitable and sustainable cannabis industry. This evolving landscape not only presents economic growth opportunities but also addresses historical injustices tied to drug policy enforcement, shaping the future of cannabis legislation in the U.S.