Cannabis News

Why Heavy Cannabis Taxation is Essentially Stealth Prohibition

Published

2 years ago

April 7, 2023

admin

taxation leads to new prohibition

How Heavy Taxation is essentially “Stealth Prohibition”

Prohibition has long been a scourge on society, casting a dark shadow over the freedoms we hold dear. By stifling the civil liberties of its citizens, drug prohibition has fed the monstrous appetite of the state, allowing it to reach further into our lives and erode the very foundations of liberty.

Legalization emerged as the beacon of hope that would dismantle this oppressive regime, taking the wind from the sails of the black market, and restoring balance.

However, we failed to foresee the devious resilience of prohibition, its insidious ability to transform and adapt.

As it turns out, heavy taxation has become the new, more cunning form of prohibition. Rather than eradicating the black market, excessive taxes have breathed life into it, allowing it to persist and thrive in the shadows.

This is the cautionary tale of how even the most well-intentioned efforts to bring about change can be subverted by the stealthy persistence of prohibition’s sinister grasp.

The treacherous tale of prohibition and heavy taxation and regulation is one of eerie parallels, as if the two were long-lost siblings separated at birth, only to converge upon a path of destruction. Both stem from the same misguided belief that the state knows best and can wield its power to control the choices and behaviors of its citizens. Just as the iron fist of prohibition sought to smother the sale and consumption of illicit substances, heavy taxation and regulation stifle the budding potential of legal markets, suffocating their growth beneath a crushing weight.

Consider the ill-fated era of alcohol prohibition in the United States. In the 1920s, the government’s zealous crusade against alcohol led to a surge in organized crime, underground speakeasies, and tainted, dangerous beverages. Fast forward to the present day, and we witness a strikingly similar situation unfolding in the realm of cannabis. Exorbitant taxes and byzantine regulations have driven consumers into the welcoming arms of the black market, where shadowy figures peddle their wares, unconcerned with quality control or the safety of their customers.

California’s cannabis market stands as a prime example of this phenomenon. Despite the state’s efforts to legalize and regulate the industry, illegal sales continue to dwarf their legal counterparts, reaching a staggering $8 billion annually. The culprit? A complex web of taxes and fees, driving the cost of legal products to two or three times that of their illicit counterparts.

A chilling parallel can be drawn to the cigarette market in New York, where high taxes have led to a booming smuggling trade, accounting for over 53% of all cigarettes sold. The lesson is clear: when the state clamps down on a market with heavy taxation and regulation, it inadvertently breathes life into the very black markets it seeks to eliminate.

Like an ominous echo reverberating through history, the consequences of prohibition and heavy taxation and regulation share a dark, twisted commonality. They both serve to empower the state, restrict individual freedom, and fuel the growth of underground markets. These grim similarities serve as a stark reminder that the battle for personal liberty is far from over, and that vigilance is needed to prevent the resurrection of prohibition in a new, insidious form.

As the old adage goes, “if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.” But when it comes to black markets, the best approach is not to join them, but to outsmart and outprice them. Creating a peer-to-peer marketplace that is accessible, affordable, and operates with minimal regulation can be the key to dismantling the stronghold of black markets on the cannabis industry.

In an ideal world, individuals over the age of 21 would be free to grow, gift, and even sell cannabis in small, “farmer’s market” type establishments, without being burdened by onerous regulations. A $1,000 per year license, coupled with a cap on individual profit, could help nurture a thriving, grassroots marketplace that keeps the black market at bay.

Under this proposed “individual license,” sales to dispensaries or authorized retailers would be prohibited, and no transactions could take place with organizations or businesses. This would ensure a 100% peer-to-peer marketplace, where cannabis enthusiasts could support one another and cultivate a sense of community.

For larger operations, a second, more heavily regulated marketplace could exist, catering to those who generate income beyond the maximum allowed under the first license. The second license would encompass all the heavy tax burdens and provide larger corporations access to the mass retail market. This two-tier licensing system would create a balanced environment in which small, individual sellers could coexist alongside larger, corporate entities.

I have written about this idea before, but I cannot stress enough the importance of bringing it to the forefront of public discourse. By presenting it as a viable, realistic option, we can help reshape the way people think about cannabis regulation and encourage them to embrace alternative approaches.

This dual marketplace model not only fosters a sense of community and camaraderie among cannabis enthusiasts, but also helps combat the black market by offering consumers a safer, more affordable, and more legitimate alternative. When the legal market can compete with the black market on price, quality, and accessibility, consumers will have little incentive to venture into the shadows for their cannabis needs.

As history has shown time and time again, heavy-handed regulation and exorbitant taxes only serve to drive consumers toward black markets, where prices are lower and the allure of illicit transactions is too tempting to resist. By implementing a two-tier licensing system that caters to both small-scale, peer-to-peer transactions and larger, corporate sales, we can create a more inclusive and equitable cannabis market that leaves the black market struggling to survive.

The path to defeating the black market lies not in the iron grip of regulation or the crushing weight of taxation but in the power of a fair and open marketplace that empowers individuals and communities. By promoting a dual marketplace model, we can cultivate a thriving cannabis culture that not only undercuts the black market but also fosters creativity, innovation, and connection among cannabis enthusiasts.

The key to dismantling the black market’s dominance over the cannabis industry is to beat them at their own game by offering consumers a legal, safe, and affordable alternative.

The two-tier licensing system proposed here, with a focus on peer-to-peer transactions and a balanced approach to regulation and taxation, can help to create an inclusive and vibrant cannabis marketplace that leaves the black market in the dust.

By championing this idea and bringing it to the forefront of public discourse, we can pave the way for a more equitable and prosperous future for the cannabis community.

As a seasoned cannabis blogger and psychonaut, I have seen the landscape of the cannabis industry change dramatically over the past two decades. While there is a growing push for legalization and a shift in public perception, the reality is that the greed of politics, lobbying, and powerful interests continues to shape the laws and regulations that govern this industry. Despite my idealistic vision of a two-tiered marketplace that can effectively undercut the black market, I must admit that the prospect of such a system coming to fruition anytime soon seems unlikely.

The unfortunate truth is that the power dynamics within the cannabis industry are deeply entrenched, and the financial interests of politicians, lobbyists, and big businesses often eclipse the desires of the grassroots cannabis community. Unless there is a strong, sustained movement from the ground up, it is difficult to imagine the kind of sweeping change that would be necessary to implement a more equitable and inclusive marketplace.

That being said, the anarchist within me recognizes that there is a certain degree of subversion and defiance already at play in the current cannabis landscape. The so-called “grey market” – that nebulous space between the legal and illegal spheres – is home to countless individuals and small collectives who are already operating under the principles of the two-tiered marketplace I propose. They grow, share, and sell cannabis in a way that emphasizes community and cooperation, rather than profit and power.

By bringing these grey market operators into the legal fold, my proposed system would not only give them a legitimate space to compete with the black market but also help to divert money away from criminal cartels and into the hands of conscientious, community-minded individuals. While this may seem like a pipe dream in the current political climate, the very existence of the grey market – and the passion and commitment of those who operate within it – is evidence that the seeds of change have already been sown.

As we look to the future of the cannabis industry, it is essential that we remain vigilant and outspoken in our advocacy for a more equitable and just system. While the two-tiered marketplace I propose may not be on the horizon just yet, it is important to keep this ideal alive in our collective consciousness and use it as a guiding star as we continue to navigate the murky waters of cannabis politics.

In the meantime, the best we can do is to support grassroots movements, educate ourselves and others about the complexities of the cannabis industry, and continue to push for change at every level. By keeping the dream of a fair and open marketplace alive, we can help to shape the discourse surrounding cannabis and ensure that our voices are not drowned out by the cacophony of greed and power that currently dominates the industry.

In conclusion, while I do not believe that the two-tiered marketplace I propose will become a reality in the immediate future, I remain optimistic that the tides of change are shifting, albeit slowly. By continuing to advocate for a more inclusive and equitable cannabis industry, we can keep the flame of hope alive and work towards a future in which the black market is a relic of the past, and the cannabis community thrives in a fair and just marketplace.

GUESS HOW MUCH CHEAPER THE BLACK MARKET IS? READ ON…

THE BLACK MARKET IS 94% CHEAPER ON EDIBLES, WHAT???

Source link

Cannabis News

The Grinch Stole SAFE Banking from the Cannabis Industry This Christmas, Yet Again!

Published

9 hours ago

December 22, 2024

admin

no safe banking in 2024

The landscape of cannabis legislation in the United States has been a complex and evolving issue, particularly concerning banking regulations. As of December 2024, it has become official: the current Congress will not provide any protections for banks that serve state-legal marijuana businesses. This decision has significant implications for the cannabis industry, which continues to grow rapidly despite the lack of federal support. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this decision, the implications for cannabis businesses, and the broader context of cannabis legalization in America.

The State of Cannabis Legalization

A Growing Industry

The cannabis industry has seen remarkable growth over the past decade. As of late 2024, 23 states and Washington D.C. have legalized recreational marijuana use, while 38 states allow medical marijuana. According to recent estimates, the legal cannabis market in the U.S. is projected to reach over $40 billion by 2025. This growth has been fueled by changing public perceptions of marijuana, increased advocacy for legalization, and significant tax revenues generated by state-legal cannabis sales.

The Banking Dilemma

Despite this rapid expansion, cannabis businesses face unique challenges, primarily due to their inability to access traditional banking services. Federal law classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act. This classification creates a significant barrier for banks and financial institutions that wish to work with cannabis businesses, as they risk federal penalties for facilitating transactions related to an illegal substance.

As a result, many cannabis companies operate on a cash-only basis. This situation not only poses safety risks—such as increased theft and violence—but also limits these businesses’ ability to manage finances effectively, pay taxes electronically, and build credit histories.

Legislative Attempts at Reform

One of the most prominent legislative efforts aimed at addressing these banking issues is the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act. First introduced in 2019, the SAFE Banking Act sought to provide protections for banks that serve legal cannabis businesses by preventing federal regulators from penalizing them for doing so.

The act garnered significant bipartisan support in both the House and Senate. In previous sessions of Congress, it passed multiple times in the House but faced hurdles in the Senate due to opposition from certain lawmakers who were concerned about broader implications of marijuana legalization.

In light of ongoing discussions about federal spending and budgetary priorities, advocates had hoped that some version of the SAFE Banking Act would be included in recent spending bills. However, during negotiations leading up to December 2024, a House committee led by Republicans removed any provisions related to marijuana banking protections from key spending legislation.

This decision reflects a broader trend within Congress where discussions around cannabis reform have become increasingly contentious. While there is still bipartisan support for certain aspects of cannabis legislation—particularly when it comes to medical use—more comprehensive reforms like banking protections have struggled to gain traction.

Implications for Cannabis Businesses

Continued Cash-Only Operations

The removal of banking protections means that many cannabis businesses will continue to operate primarily on a cash basis. This situation presents several challenges:

Safety Risks: Cash-only operations make cannabis dispensaries and cultivation facilities prime targets for theft and robber Employees often have to handle large amounts of cash daily, increasing their risk of violence.

Operational Inefficiencies: Without access to banking services, businesses cannot easily manage payroll or pay bills electronically. This inefficiency can lead to operational delays and increased costs.

Impact on Public Safety

Advocates argue that providing banking access would enhance public safety by reducing the amount of cash circulating within the community. By allowing cannabis businesses to deposit their earnings into banks, it would minimize the risks associated with cash transactions, making both employees and customers safer.

Moreover, having a transparent financial system would help law enforcement track illicit activities more effectively. Currently, without proper banking oversight, there are concerns that some cash-only operations may be involved in money laundering or other illegal activities.

Politics and Public Opinion

Changing Attitudes Toward Cannabis

Public opinion on marijuana legalization has shifted dramatically over recent years. According to various polls, a significant majority of Americans now support legalizing marijuana for both medical and recreational use. This shift has put pressure on lawmakers to address outdated federal policies regarding cannabis.

Despite this growing acceptance among the public, political divisions remain strong within Congress regarding how best to approach cannabis reform. Some lawmakers advocate for full legalization at the federal level, while others prefer a more cautious approach that prioritizes regulation over outright legalization.

The Role of Advocacy Groups

Advocacy groups play a crucial role in pushing for legislative change regarding cannabis banking protections. Organizations such as the National Cannabis Industry Association (NCIA) and Americans for Safe Access (ASA) have been vocal proponents of reforming banking laws to support state-legal cannabis businesses.

These groups have mobilized public support through campaigns highlighting the safety risks associated with cash-only operations and advocating for policies that promote financial inclusion for cannabis entrepreneurs.

Future Prospects for Cannabis Banking Reform

While current congressional efforts have stalled regarding marijuana banking protections, there are still potential avenues for reform:

Incremental Reforms: Rather than pursuing comprehensive federal legislation like the SAFE Banking Act all at once, lawmakers may consider incremental reforms that address specific issues related to banking access without fully legalizing marijuana at the federal level.

The Role of Public Awareness

As public awareness about the challenges faced by cannabis businesses grows, there may be increased pressure on lawmakers to act decisively on this issue. Continued advocacy efforts can help ensure that banking reform remains a priority on Congress’s agenda.

Conclusion

The decision by Congress not to include marijuana banking protections in its current spending bill underscores ongoing tensions surrounding cannabis legislation in America. While public opinion increasingly favors legalization and reform, political divisions continue to hinder progress on critical issues such as banking access for state-legal marijuana businesses.

As the industry continues to grow despite these challenges, stakeholders must remain vigilant in advocating for change while exploring alternative solutions at both state and federal levels. The future of cannabis banking reform remains uncertain; however, with continued advocacy and public support, there is hope that meaningful progress can be made in addressing these pressing issues facing one of America’s fastest-growing industries.

SAFE BANKING SINCE 2018, WHAT A FAILURE, READ ON…

SAFER BANKING ACT FAILS AGAINS, SAME OF BANANA IN THE TAILPIPE!

Source link

Cannabis News

HHC vs. Delta 9: Differences & Similarities

Published

2 days ago

December 20, 2024

admin

Cannabis has so many compounds, and two that have been making the rounds lately are HHC and Delta 9 THC. They’re not the same thing, even though they’re both cannabinoids that interact with the body’s endocannabinoid system. Some people want a mild, steady experience, while others might be looking for something more intense. Understanding these two can help you figure out what’s right for you.

What Is HHC?

HHC, short for hexahydrocannabinol, is a hydrogenated version of THC. It’s not something you’d find naturally in large amounts in cannabis plants. Instead, it’s made through a process that adds hydrogen molecules to THC. The result? A more stable compound that’s less prone to breaking down when exposed to heat or UV light.

How HHC Is Made

Think of it like a science experiment. HHC is usually created in a lab by taking Delta 9 or Delta 8 THC and using hydrogenation—basically, combining it with hydrogen under pressure and in the presence of a catalyst. This process changes its structure while keeping its effects somewhat similar to THC.

Common Uses and Effects of HHC

People who use HHC say it’s somewhere between Delta 8 and Delta 9 in terms of effects. It’s often described as relaxing but without being overly sedative. You might feel a light buzz, reduced stress, or mild euphoria. Some even claim it helps with discomfort or improving sleep, but solid research is still catching up. Since it’s less potent than Delta 9, it’s often favored by those who want a manageable experience without the strong psychoactive punch.

If you’re interested in trying HHC and Delta 9 for yourself, check out their wide range of products at trycandycloud.com. They’ve got everything from gummies to disposable vapes, all crafted for a smooth experience.

What Is Delta 9 THC?

Delta 9 THC is the main psychoactive compound in cannabis. It’s the reason you feel “high” when you use weed. Chemically speaking, Delta 9 has a double bond in its ninth carbon chain, which plays a big role in how it interacts with your brain.

Natural Occurrence in Cannabis

This one is straightforward: Delta 9 is found in high concentrations in marijuana plants. It’s what most people think of when they hear “THC.” Unlike HHC, there’s no need for a lab process—it’s already there. Hemp plants, however, contain much lower levels of Delta 9 THC, which is why it’s primarily extracted from marijuana.

Common Uses and Effects of Delta 9 THC

The effects of Delta 9 are well-documented. Depending on the dose, you might feel euphoria, increased appetite, or deep relaxation. For medical users, it’s often used to manage chronic pain, nausea, and other conditions. It’s also been studied for its potential benefits in anxiety relief, though higher doses might have the opposite effect, causing paranoia. Delta 9 THC is versatile, but it’s not without its risks, particularly for new users or those sensitive to its psychoactive effects.

Key Differences Between HHC and Delta 9 THC

Chemical Structure and Composition

The main difference is in their structure. Delta 9 THC has that iconic double bond, while HHC’s hydrogenation makes it more stable. This difference might not mean much to the average person, but it’s why HHC is less likely to degrade over time.

Potency Levels

Delta 9 THC is generally more potent. HHC might require a higher dose to get a comparable effect, but some people prefer its lighter touch. Potency differences can also depend on the method of consumption, with edibles typically providing a stronger, longer-lasting effect compared to vaping or smoking.

Duration of Effects

Both last a few hours, but some users report that HHC’s effects fade more gradually. Delta 9, on the other hand, can have a sharper comedown. HHC’s gradual fade makes it appealing for those who want a smooth end to their experience.

Benefits and Drawbacks of HHC and Delta 9 THC

HHC: Pros and Cons

Pros:

More stable, so it lasts longer on the shelf.
Effects are milder, making it less overwhelming for beginners.
Can be a functional option for daytime use.

Cons:

Limited research, so we don’t know its full impact yet.
Availability can be hit or miss depending on where you live.
Legal gray area in many regions.

Delta 9 THC: Pros and Cons

Pros:

Well-studied with established medical uses.
Widely available in areas where cannabis is legal.
Stronger effects make it ideal for experienced users or those with high tolerance.

Cons:

Higher chance of side effects like anxiety.
More likely to show up on drug tests.
Shorter shelf life compared to HHC.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q. Is HHC safer than Delta 9 THC?

Not enough research exists to say definitively, but HHC’s milder effects might make it feel safer to some users.

Q. Will HHC or Delta 9 THC show up on a drug test?

Yes, both can potentially show up on a drug test, so use with caution if that’s a concern.

Q. Which one is better for recreational use?

That depends on your preferences. HHC is great for a mellow time, while Delta 9 is better if you’re looking for something more intense.

HHC vs. Delta 9: Choosing the Right One for You

The choice comes down to what you’re after. If you want a milder, more laid-back experience, HHC might be a good option. On the other hand, if you’re looking for something stronger or need it for medical reasons, Delta 9 is the way to go. It also depends on what’s legal and available where you are. And always consider your tolerance levels and experience before diving in. If you’re unsure, consult with a knowledgeable dispensary staff.

Resources:

Source link

Cannabis News

What Federally Illegal Drug Has Created Almost $10 Billion in Sales Tax Revenue for States in the Last 40 Months?

Published

2 days ago

December 20, 2024

admin

sales tax revenue with marijuana

In a significant development for the burgeoning cannabis industry, the U.S. Census Bureau has reported that states across the nation have collectively amassed over **$9.7 billion** in tax revenue from marijuana sales since mid-2021. This figure underscores the economic impact of legalized cannabis and highlights the growing acceptance of marijuana as both a recreational and medicinal substance in various states. As more states move toward legalization, the financial implications both positive and negative are becoming increasingly evident.

The Landscape of Cannabis Legalization

The journey toward cannabis legalization in the United States has been long and complex. Initially criminalized in the early 20th century, cannabis began to regain acceptance in the late 20th century, particularly for medical use. The first state to legalize medical marijuana was California in 1996, setting a precedent that many states would follow.

By 2012, Colorado and Washington became the first states to legalize recreational cannabis, paving the way for a wave of legalization efforts across the country. As of now, more than 20 states have legalized recreational marijuana, while over 30 states allow medical use. This shift reflects changing public attitudes toward cannabis and recognition of its potential benefits.

Economic Implications of Legalization

The legalization of cannabis has not only transformed social norms but has also created a substantial economic impact. States that have embraced legalization have seen significant increases in tax revenue, job creation, and investment opportunities.

According to the latest Census Bureau report, states like California, Colorado, Illinois, and Michigan have emerged as leaders in cannabis tax revenue generation. These states have implemented various tax structures on marijuana sales, including excise taxes, sales taxes, and local taxes. The revenue generated is often earmarked for essential public services such as education, healthcare, infrastructure improvements, and drug rehabilitation programs.

Breakdown of Tax Revenue by State

As the largest legal cannabis market in the United States, California has been at the forefront of marijuana tax revenue generation. Since mid-2021, California has contributed approximately $2.5 billion to state coffers from cannabis taxes. This revenue is derived from both recreational and medical marijuana sales.

California’s tax structure includes a 15% excise tax on retail sales, along with local taxes that can vary significantly by city and county. The state has allocated a portion of these funds to various programs aimed at addressing issues related to drug abuse and public health.

Colorado was one of the pioneers in cannabis legalization and continues to serve as a model for other states. Since mid-2021, Colorado has generated around $1.8 billion in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state imposes a 15% excise tax on wholesale marijuana transactions and a 2.9% sales tax on retail sales.

The revenue generated from cannabis taxes has been instrumental in funding education initiatives through the Public School Fund, as well as supporting mental health programs and substance abuse treatment services.

Illinois has seen remarkable growth in its cannabis market since legalizing recreational use in January 2020. In just two years, Illinois has collected approximately $1 billion in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state imposes a tiered excise tax based on the potency of the product, ranging from 10% to 25%.

The funds collected are allocated to various initiatives, including community reinvestment programs aimed at addressing social equity issues related to past drug enforcement practices.

Michigan’s cannabis market has also flourished since legalization. Since mid-2021, Michigan has generated about $700 million in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state’s tax structure includes a 10% excise tax on recreational marijuana and a 6% sales tax.

The revenue is utilized for various purposes, including education funding and support for local governments impacted by legalization.

Broader Economic Impact

The legalization of cannabis has led to significant job creation across various sectors. According to industry reports, the legal cannabis market supports hundreds of thousands of jobs nationwide—from cultivation and processing to retail and distribution. As more states legalize marijuana, this trend is expected to continue.

With the growth of the legal cannabis industry comes increased investment opportunities. Entrepreneurs are entering the market at an unprecedented rate, leading to innovations in product development, marketing strategies, and distribution channels. This influx of investment not only benefits individual businesses but also stimulates local economies.

Social Equity Considerations

While the financial benefits of cannabis legalization are clear, it is essential to address social equity issues that arise alongside this new industry. Many states have recognized that communities disproportionately affected by past drug enforcement policies should benefit from legalization efforts.

States like Illinois have implemented community reinvestment programs that allocate a portion of cannabis tax revenues to support communities impacted by previous drug laws. These funds can be used for education initiatives, job training programs, and mental health services—aiming to rectify historical injustices associated with cannabis prohibition.

In addition to financial support for communities affected by past policies, some states are also working to create equitable licensing opportunities for individuals from those communities. By prioritizing applications from minority-owned businesses or those directly impacted by previous drug laws, states can foster a more inclusive cannabis industry.

Challenges Ahead

Despite the significant progress made through legalization efforts, challenges remain on both state and federal levels.

Federal Legalization Uncertainty

One major hurdle is the ongoing conflict between state and federal laws regarding cannabis. While many states have legalized marijuana for recreational or medical use, it remains classified as a Schedule I substance under federal law. This discrepancy creates complications for businesses operating legally at the state level but facing potential federal prosecution.

Efforts toward federal legalization or decriminalization have gained traction recently; however, progress remains slow due to political divisions and differing opinions on drug policy reform.

Regulatory Hurdles

As more states enter the legal cannabis market, regulatory frameworks must evolve to ensure consumer safety while promoting fair competition among businesses. States face challenges related to product testing standards, labeling requirements, advertising restrictions, and taxation policies that can impact market dynamics.

Conclusion

The U.S. Census Bureau reports that states have collected over $9.7 billion in marijuana tax revenue since mid-2021, highlighting the significant economic impact of cannabis legalization. As public acceptance grows, more states are likely to pursue legalization. Despite ongoing challenges, including federal regulations and social equity issues, legalized cannabis is poised to remain a vital part of state economies. Collaboration among government officials, business leaders, and community advocates will be essential for fostering an equitable and sustainable cannabis industry. This evolving landscape not only presents economic growth opportunities but also addresses historical injustices tied to drug policy enforcement, shaping the future of cannabis legislation in the U.S.